“Hey everythings great!” *Said some guy who seems to be getting very popular who then instead gets arrested and killed for being to popular which only makes him more popular*
@@Mrkabrat well, that’s the way it was historically. After Pyrrhus was defeated, only Hannibal came close to beating Rome. Its rise was, unfortunately for all the other civilizations, inexorable
Have been thinking about installing the mod. Will I still be able to play the DLC campaigns with the mod installed? I absolutely loved Rise of the Republic
@@Defferleffer Crusader Kings 2 is better than total war, Rome 2 is stupid, they limit the maximum number of their Governor, their Legionaire, and the time to move army so stupid
when those who try to be innovative and start a new style will always be critized by those goddamn conservative just because their ice cube brain can never turn around to think openly
The date for the capture of Massalia (Eastern Provincia) is off. Though the city was a loyal Roman ally starting with the Second Punic War in 218 BC, the city sided with the Senate in Caesar's Civil War and was subsequently taken by Caesar's forces in 49 BC. Following this it effectively lost its autonomy.
Crazy to see how much the empire grew with Scipio, Sulla, Pompey, Caesar and Trajan. Then of course the reconquests by the vastly underrated Belisarius. Caesar in particular wanted to cover this entire map, which would have broken the empire like it did the Mongols.
I think they'd explode in a more Chinese style than the mongols with factions constantly trying to regroup instead of going outward to conquer the states that popped out of Rome irl ended up colonizing the world, I can see the pieces having constant wars to reunite Rome and never wanting to expand elsewhere just like china did
The peak came under Emperor Trajan,after that Hadrian built defences including the Hadrian's wall which took 14 years to build and still stands today in Britain.
They wiped the floor with the Scots but then decided that their desolate barbarian lands were not worth taking anyway. As for the Irish, they didnt even consider invading. Besides, whats this about "unbreakable spirits"? Scotland literally gave away its Independence to England like a bitch when they went broke after failing to colonize Panama, and the Irish got conquered the hard way 🤡
yeah this is pretty cool but it doesn't give you exact dates of when a settlement was taken just roughly that all these settlements were taken in one year
Giancarlo Giovannetti not really, just takes a whole damn lot of research. You basically have to know the entire history of Rome to make a video like that.
I love this map but also trajan loose armenia and Mesopotamia at 117 ad Arsacid dynasty at armenia never could replaced by any force because it was political power greater than any military power.after all i love romans as true parthian💎🏹💜✌🏻
The east are hard to subdue and the jewish revolt of 115-117 forced to recall most of the legions in trajans expansion of the east. Hadrian then decided to abandon the new provinces as they are not defensible and there are threats north of armenia so he decided to comprise as to not drain the treasury of military upkeeps and to use the funds instead to pacify the huge roman empire.
Eden Valencia well this is actually what I told in more eastern view not roman point of view,political power is greater than military power if it wasn’t then Rome was capable to keep trajan parthian conquest and next of it it was impossible but imagine enslave my home land and subjects of Parthian empire...after all romans always love to had control Silk Road even if they were not capable and completely unhope to be Alexander the great and captured empires of Iran because of their first crushing defeats at carrhae and praspa...rome always be jealous because of the Silk Road,the parthians gave citizen ship and local policies to their subjects as federalism united states ,rome which based on slavery never could be superior in parthian lands,in general this two empires were equals and superiority was something temporary but parthians crushed Romans when rome was victorious evey where but romans defeated parthians when they were at unresting civil wars and so damn weak in military positions and lost so many territories to the eastern nomadic factions and young great kushanid empire under rule of kanishka the great in the eastern borders of parthian empire ....finally parthians replaced by another Iranian tribe Sassanids and they kept still in power under Sassanids rule ,the battle of nisbis is something proved the equality if not superiority of the parthians in front of romans in 217 ad before parthians overthrown at 226 ad.
@@aradsstates9584 Even if rome can conquer the states they cont hold them the parthians have local, army and terrain superiority. The roman legions arent designed for the eastern campaigns tbh. Also rome is already overstretched as it is
Eden Valencia indeed,i hope the empires of Rome and Iran had more peaceful relations ,its tragic that their wars led to the dominance of Arabs and Islam in 7 century...
DEI the best. Disappointed coz of the unit cards limit to 20. I can't re create the manipular system good enough. Cant balance all hastati principes and triarii
@@bobbyjoe1111 historically accurate, this gets the seal of approval 👍 Although in game it would be more economical to replace all the hastati with principes
We brought down the Romans and persians, and we now conpuered Andalusia to spsin and France, and we opened China, lndia and the text of Africa, and we opened Turkey and we defe ated Europe for years and we opened Malaysia and what follows it. ln the past, people came from Europe to study with us(we Muslims)
And you were conquer later by the French, British, Spanish and Italian. Ha! you never learn, SandNi Also, What about Jerusalem? Oh I'm sorry what did you say? I can't hear you when you're crying ;)
@@Felix-xi3wo You don't have Jerusalem either. Your crusaders were thrown out, less than 200 years after they came. And today your Pope openly supports LGBT, no one goes to church and people openly mock religion in the streets in western countries. Spain, which used to be the most zealous catholic state is now the wokest in Europe. You guys are finished!
Ehm you do know that Rome actually conquered Germania but then abandoned it because the Rhine was a better border? If they wanted they could have taken out all Germanic tribes but they had no reason to do so.
@@freyrds8870 Thats not right. In the year 9 after Christi a germanic coalition whiped out the total roman army, 3 legions, which where protecting the roman colony germania. For years not a singel roman soldier entered the land. The campaign to get germania back under emperor Tiberius caused at least 50.000 killed roman soldiers. The war was a clear draw, no side could win. Since the germanic coalition used guerilla warfare it was impossible to beat the germanic tribes descisive, if they dont wanted too. Germania or Germany was covered mainly with dense forests, where you would even miss people camping 2 miles near to you,
@@321AlterSchwede Germanicus defeated the Germanic tribes which is why he gained the nickname. Gaul had many forests but Rome conquered it. The Iberian tribes used guerilla warfare but they were conquered. The Germans were great warriors but you can't deny that if Rome REALLY wanted to conquer Germania they could have done it. They didn't waste anymore legions becasue they knew that it would have been useless to occupy it since the Germans would always revolt and the land was pretty much worthless.
@@freyrds8870 That is one possible theory, but every sentence you say is doubtful, without offending you. It is thinkable, that rome could have conquered germania magna to the Elbe if they have wanted. It is also thinkable, that roman couldnt conquer germania magna, EVEN if they wanted. In fact Tiberius campaigned 3 years in germania, without any effect. Two battles where undescisive with heavy losses for both sides, tow battles where clearly won by Tiberius. But this 4 battles are only one part. I assume the germans have used permanent guerilla warfare to cut off the roman supplys. So the roman armys always had to stay connected to places with fortresses, which they Build on Weser and Lahn. With this logistic limitations it was clearly impossible to beat the german warriors, which where light armoured, highly mobile and especially good in guerilla warfare. The romans could have campaigned for 20 or 50 years without getting a descisive victory, since the germans could avoid battle.
@@321AlterSchwede look at this barbarian lol, dude you are typing in latin characters so in some way rome did conquered you and all that we call western civilization.
@@scarversek6419 the main genre is strategy though in contradiction with the games you propose to compare. Turn based, grand strategy, rts all these genres address to the same market
“Heeeyyy said the Romans eating the entire meditteranian for breakfast”
"Thanks for invading my homeland" said the Jews who were getting tired of people invading their homeland.
“Hey everythings great!” *Said some guy who seems to be getting very popular who then instead gets arrested and killed for being to popular which only makes him more popular*
can we just agree how bill's idea is nihilistic and religious at the same time that no one fights in his comment section?
@@mohamedfouda8181 i see the algorithim has united us here to discuss how bill's stuff is so good it makes people more friendly
@@14thbattlegroupcommander I certainly agree bro
This game is underrated, as it’s pretty good now
I think it has improved from a 5.5 to a solid 8 out of 10
Divide et impera adds a lot more
@@otavio8566 The problem I see with that mod is that if you get stuck in a war with Rome youre in a lot of trouble
@@Mrkabrat well, that’s the way it was historically. After Pyrrhus was defeated, only Hannibal came close to beating Rome. Its rise was, unfortunately for all the other civilizations, inexorable
Have been thinking about installing the mod. Will I still be able to play the DLC campaigns with the mod installed? I absolutely loved Rise of the Republic
Don't forget that one village in armorica that the Romans never conquered...
The village full of indomitable gauls?
Wasn't it gaul?
@@MyUsersDark armorica is the province
Technically not a province, it was part of Lugdunensis.
Yeah yeah I heard that one before..
*New campaigns in hispania intensify*
Even though most people hate this game I still like it.
Some Guy I think it’s the best in the series.
@@Defferleffer Crusader Kings 2 is better than total war, Rome 2 is stupid, they limit the maximum number of their Governor, their Legionaire, and the time to move army so stupid
TheBECK321 hahaha uhm I said “the best in the series” (total war) sooo... why don’t you just fuck off plz
when those who try to be innovative and start a new style will always be critized by those goddamn conservative just because their ice cube brain can never turn around to think openly
@@lotrlmao1648 lol new Style
So completly chopping down well established Features is now a nee Style which always make a game better?
hahaha awesome. was looking for a Roman expansion timeline to play Rome to in TW:Rome2, then this popped up. cheers man
Yer feels strange when the game tries to make you conquer Gaul like 100 years before Caeser was born
The date for the capture of Massalia (Eastern Provincia) is off. Though the city was a loyal Roman ally starting with the Second Punic War in 218 BC, the city sided with the Senate in Caesar's Civil War and was subsequently taken by Caesar's forces in 49 BC. Following this it effectively lost its autonomy.
Still blows my mind that Caesar had to reconquer half the territory of Rome and did it in about the same time Aurelian did his thing.
Crazy to see how much the empire grew with Scipio, Sulla, Pompey, Caesar and Trajan. Then of course the reconquests by the vastly underrated Belisarius. Caesar in particular wanted to cover this entire map, which would have broken the empire like it did the Mongols.
I think they'd explode in a more Chinese style than the mongols with factions constantly trying to regroup instead of going outward to conquer
the states that popped out of Rome irl ended up colonizing the world, I can see the pieces having constant wars to reunite Rome and never wanting to expand elsewhere just like china did
new campaigns in Hispania
One of these for each of the expansion maps would be interesting. Maybe also for other empires evolving like Carthage or the Alexander Kingdoms
Still one of my favorite total wars. They’re not even trying nowadays.
3KTW is good though
should of kept going up to the spliting of the empire rather than just a territorial peak
i rather enjoy the good parts instead of crying
The peak came under Emperor Trajan,after that Hadrian built defences including the Hadrian's wall which took 14 years to build and still stands today in Britain.
Man everyone would click off by then
We don’t do that here
love the video.
Missed out the part where Rome took the southern half of Scotland at one point.
Thanks for the info :)
That's awesome dud e
1:30 а в следующем кадре он её потеряет)
А потом Месопотамию захватит
@@user-sk4cy6vz4k А потом Месопотамию захватит
What tool was used for this? Could it be used for Imperaotr Augusuts/Empire Divided and possibly Attila Total War?
Beautiful
It's weird to see this on youtube. I made it a while ago and almost forgot about it.
Rome was like a player playing a nation on Ck2, winning all battles against AI
@Belagerungsmörser the Sheep Carthage: _why Is It getting so hot in here?_
Would be cool if you included the other factions in this map!
Loved it
Total war Attila after???
А потом Месопотамию захватит
Yo this is actually cool
And it will all go down from here..
Awkward when you use the 4 turns per year mod and have already expanded beyond the accurate years.
If you have more turns in less years is easier to expand faster than how romans did
glorious.
Que recuerdos!
Rome OP, plz nerf.
History: Okay. *Proceeds to third century Rome*
i already conquered the full map before 60bc
Cool, but who asked?
@@thecatfather857 I
I love how they just stopped at Scotland and Ireland 😂They knew our spirits are unbreakable even at the hands of empires...
They wiped the floor with the Scots but then decided that their desolate barbarian lands were not worth taking anyway.
As for the Irish, they didnt even consider invading.
Besides, whats this about "unbreakable spirits"?
Scotland literally gave away its Independence to England like a bitch when they went broke after failing to colonize Panama, and the Irish got conquered the hard way 🤡
'Battle of teutoburg forest' *poof* that hurts
Maure ❤️
liked the video.
yeah this is pretty cool but it doesn't give you exact dates of when a settlement was taken just roughly that all these settlements were taken in one year
Madlad Junoir because with the in-game map is impossible duh.
Giancarlo Giovannetti not really, just takes a whole damn lot of research. You basically have to know the entire history of Rome to make a video like that.
ua-cam.com/video/w5zYpWcz1-E/v-deo.html YOUR WELCOME
if i may how do u edit the video using what software
AD ASPERA AD ASTRA,
AD ARDUA AD ASTRA,
EXURGE MARS, MARS ULTOR,
ROMA ET IMPERATOR
Their societal model was based on expansion and domination, without expansion the model failed.
👍🏻
Britain wasnt invaded that late...
dardania you forgot to present this is a funny map, dardania has founded roman paris londren etc. Illyrian 👑
Now the fall of the empire in TW Attila
This
I bet they don't do it to me though
Until 1212
🔨🥜
in reality the Veneti remained autonomous until the end of the 1st century BC when they obtained Roman citizenship from Julius Caesar
They weren't autonomous, they were subjects of the Roman Republic under Ius Latii instead of Ius Romanii.
got game file?
I love this map but also trajan loose armenia and Mesopotamia at 117 ad
Arsacid dynasty at armenia never could replaced by any force because it was political power greater than any military power.after all i love romans as true parthian💎🏹💜✌🏻
The east are hard to subdue and the jewish revolt of 115-117 forced to recall most of the legions in trajans expansion of the east. Hadrian then decided to abandon the new provinces as they are not defensible and there are threats north of armenia so he decided to comprise as to not drain the treasury of military upkeeps and to use the funds instead to pacify the huge roman empire.
Eden Valencia well this is actually what I told in more eastern view not roman point of view,political power is greater than military power if it wasn’t then Rome was capable to keep trajan parthian conquest and next of it it was impossible but imagine enslave my home land and subjects of Parthian empire...after all romans always love to had control Silk Road even if they were not capable and completely unhope to be Alexander the great and captured empires of Iran because of their first crushing defeats at carrhae and praspa...rome always be jealous because of the Silk Road,the parthians gave citizen ship and local policies to their subjects as federalism united states ,rome which based on slavery never could be superior in parthian lands,in general this two empires were equals and superiority was something temporary but parthians crushed Romans when rome was victorious evey where but romans defeated parthians when they were at unresting civil wars and so damn weak in military positions and lost so many territories to the eastern nomadic factions and young great kushanid empire under rule of kanishka the great in the eastern borders of parthian empire ....finally parthians replaced by another Iranian tribe Sassanids and they kept still in power under Sassanids rule ,the battle of nisbis is something proved the equality if not superiority of the parthians in front of romans in 217 ad before parthians overthrown at 226 ad.
@@aradsstates9584 Even if rome can conquer the states they cont hold them the parthians have local, army and terrain superiority. The roman legions arent designed for the eastern campaigns tbh. Also rome is already overstretched as it is
Eden Valencia indeed,i hope the empires of Rome and Iran had more peaceful relations ,its tragic that their wars led to the dominance of Arabs and Islam in 7 century...
Soooooo,
115 AD is the last turn in the game , I'm assuming?
Depends on the campaing you are playing.
bien ahora seguire el ejemplo en el juego
I hate that they got rid of this thing.
A pity that such a successful empire collapsed due to-- well too much to think of 🤔
Rome in Crimea
Ok the only thing left is parthian iranian empire.sounds good
germania, russia, scythia, afghanistan, china.
where still there
@@RustingPeace adfqanistan(bakteria)was part of Parthian empire
DEI the best. Disappointed coz of the unit cards limit to 20. I can't re create the manipular system good enough. Cant balance all hastati principes and triarii
1 general
2 equites
5 hastati
5 principes
3 triari
4 velites
@@bobbyjoe1111 historically accurate, this gets the seal of approval 👍
Although in game it would be more economical to replace all the hastati with principes
It was at this moment he knew...
He fucked up.
Crym
We brought down the Romans and persians, and we now conpuered Andalusia to spsin and France, and we opened China, lndia and the text of Africa, and we opened Turkey and we defe ated Europe for years and we opened Malaysia and what follows it. ln the past, people came from Europe to study with us(we Muslims)
And you were conquer later by the French, British, Spanish and Italian. Ha! you never learn, SandNi
Also, What about Jerusalem? Oh I'm sorry what did you say? I can't hear you when you're crying ;)
@@Felix-xi3wo You don't have Jerusalem either. Your crusaders were thrown out, less than 200 years after they came.
And today your Pope openly supports LGBT, no one goes to church and people openly mock religion in the streets in western countries.
Spain, which used to be the most zealous catholic state is now the wokest in Europe.
You guys are finished!
The germanic tribes were the only culture who stopped roman expansion in Europe.
Ehm you do know that Rome actually conquered Germania but then abandoned it because the Rhine was a better border? If they wanted they could have taken out all Germanic tribes but they had no reason to do so.
@@freyrds8870 Thats not right. In the year 9 after Christi a germanic coalition whiped out the total roman army, 3 legions, which where protecting the roman colony germania. For years not a singel roman soldier entered the land. The campaign to get germania back under emperor Tiberius caused at least 50.000 killed roman soldiers. The war was a clear draw, no side could win. Since the germanic coalition used guerilla warfare it was impossible to beat the germanic tribes descisive, if they dont wanted too. Germania or Germany was covered mainly with dense forests, where you would even miss people camping 2 miles near to you,
@@321AlterSchwede Germanicus defeated the Germanic tribes which is why he gained the nickname. Gaul had many forests but Rome conquered it. The Iberian tribes used guerilla warfare but they were conquered. The Germans were great warriors but you can't deny that if Rome REALLY wanted to conquer Germania they could have done it. They didn't waste anymore legions becasue they knew that it would have been useless to occupy it since the Germans would always revolt and the land was pretty much worthless.
@@freyrds8870 That is one possible theory, but every sentence you say is doubtful, without offending you. It is thinkable, that rome could have conquered germania magna to the Elbe if they have wanted. It is also thinkable, that roman couldnt conquer germania magna, EVEN if they wanted. In fact Tiberius campaigned 3 years in germania, without any effect. Two battles where undescisive with heavy losses for both sides, tow battles where clearly won by Tiberius. But this 4 battles are only one part. I assume the germans have used permanent guerilla warfare to cut off the roman supplys. So the roman armys always had to stay connected to places with fortresses, which they Build on Weser and Lahn. With this logistic limitations it was clearly impossible to beat the german warriors, which where light armoured, highly mobile and especially good in guerilla warfare. The romans could have campaigned for 20 or 50 years without getting a descisive victory, since the germans could avoid battle.
@@321AlterSchwede look at this barbarian lol, dude you are typing in latin characters so in some way rome did conquered you and all that we call western civilization.
Про Крым забыл
Why Bosforus in the f*cking Crimea??
Huh
Only WARHAMMER!
warhammer sucks
Easy mode
20 turns for one city?
*pathetic*
armenia???🤦♂️
This game sucks compared to every paradox game separately. Name one paradox title that this game is better than it. I will wait
Two different styles and genres. Want me to compare COD to skyrim too?
@@scarversek6419 the main genre is strategy though in contradiction with the games you propose to compare. Turn based, grand strategy, rts all these genres address to the same market
Gotta go Rome 1 Total War
Armenia🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲🇦🇲