Thanks.. I was in turmoil about this video because it's so hard to test and know what works, even on just one system nevermind everyone else's. But hopefully there's something in there for everyone to try or at least learn about!
@@Gigabeef With the info you gave us in this video it became way easier to trial and error our own graphics settings. Now I know which setting does what and which settings are most likely to have an effect on fps.
A good portion of why this video is so useful is because you’ve very concisely explained each element with visual demonstrations. Now not only can I copy your well researched settings, should I choose I have the knowledge on how to modify them to best fit my needs. Well done as always
It’s always a pleasure go listen to GigaBeef. Videos are extremely informative, straight to the point, and idk what’s with his voice but I just find it really soothing. Thanks for the years of high quality tarkov content, keep it up man.
I had my settings for quite a while now but I always had the feeling "it's not optimal yet". I'm definitely looking over my settings again now with the new gained info from your video! :) Thanks @Gigabeef! 🙂👍
I have an Intel i7 12700f and rtx3060.. for me I get the same FPS on 1080 and 1440 p the only thing that changes is my GPU load which is very low for both and so the best thing that I found for this game is using DSR to scale from 4K down to 1440p on my 27-inch monitor and with dlss on either performance which is what Nvidia recommends for 4K for balanced the game looks incredible and my GPU load is finally around 80%
your game runs amazing man, reminds me of how this game runs on every single map like this but not on streets, very sad but i quit playing it until its actually playable. very nice video lad thanks for trying, its the though that counts !
Another thing I’ve noticed is that Streets tends to have memory leaks that persist between raids AND maps. Went from running Streets all day to customs, just for it to run at 30 FPS with the occasional 90FPS smoothness
what's funny is I basically have half of your specs ( like literally cut down the middle in terms of vram, ram, procession power,) And I run tarkov on high settings, never get a hitch
Also as of now theres a huge memory leak. So if you start up tark and get on streets and its 60 to 70 fps but after a few raids its around 20 to 30 you need to restart the game
I am excited to test some of this on my machine using your video as a baseline I hope that some of my observations will be helpful but you know, youtube comment Thanks for the video!
No problem! I went a bit crazy because even testing just on my machine is wildly inconsistent between offline and real raids, if I'm streaming vs when not... Its a total minefield to the point that I nearly didn't release this as I was so unsure of myself at one point 😅
I used a vega 64 8gb with hbcc to make my system think the card had 64gb of VRAM(on a 256gb system). Streets pulled 22gb of vram and used 38gb of total system ram with lowest settings and high textures.
How much RAM did you have? I was able to get the map to a playable state (90+ fps) by upgrading to 32 GB of RAM using a 9600k and a 2070 super. Streets devours a boatload of RAM when loading, and the memory leaks don't make the matters any better.
I have a 3090, 7950x3d, and 64gb of DDR5 6000 and this map still runs terrible in 1440p. I checked my task manager trying to figure out why, but nothing was near to maxed out. 😞
Ok, i have a Rtx 3060, 12Gb YET on the fps 2/3 i cant recall, it only shows its using 3gb. if this is teh case i would be aswell go back to using my ATI R9 280. (This was posted as soon as beef stated the "VRAM" on the screen, Just had to get it out there). The rest of the pc, was an upgrade from a MSI z87 g45, 4770K, 32gb 2666 & the ATI saphirre R9 280 (this was in xfire as when i got the system i got 2) New spec - MSI B550 A pro, Ryzen 5600x not OC, 32gb corsair 3200, Zotac rtx 3060 12gb.
Something that I believe has been confirmed is that shadows on anything under High, will be using the CPU rather than the GPU. Which will make a difference depending on your system. If you have a good GPU and meh CPU, then High Shadows is best.
It's not... That is a myth. Pull up MSI Afterburner and monitor your CPU usage and FPS in game. Cranking shadows does not lower CPU usage and your FPS drop in game when shadows are raised, unless you have a pretty damn good PC build.
@@bozojoe197 I know it used to be true. So it will have been fixed at some point, if what you are saying is accurate. I don't want to do the testing and I don't have frame rate concerns. So I'll just take your word for it and assume they fixed it.
DLSS and the quality of life features are the biggest ups to this wipe. But unfornately the CPU bottlenecking still needs optimisation. I found my settings and it doesn't get better than this at 50-70fps
A few years ago i did a video comparing ram speed in tarkov, to this day the video get comments that testing in offline raids is useless etc But these people don't understand that it's impossible to get reliable results in online raids Hope you don't get these comments 👍
Ive seen my 3090 hit 16gb of Vram usage in task manager on lighthouse @1440p. Also for CPU if you see low percentage usage in task manger that’s because that number is the overall usage of all the cores but if you use a software that can show per core usage you’ll notice tarkov will probably be maxing out 1-2 cores. Wish the game just ran better for people who don’t have access to expensive builds. Hope they actually make some good improvements like promised in the coming updates
Ram cleaner doesn’t work either other than 1st raid. I use a ram cleaner program with lasso with my new 7800x3D and 7900XTX & get over 200 fps in 1440p on high settings new mip streaming
Me struggling to make the game run on lowest seettings with reduced resolution on my gtx 1050 with 2gb vram and crap internet that dc's me one in every 10 raids
you should mention you play at 1440p because most people are at 1080p which is less gpu bound than 1440p. On 1080p i would get 50-70% gpu usage but at 1440p i get 80-95% on streets (lower on easier to run maps). The game will also use more VRAM at 1440p but at 1080p even just 6gb is enough. Should've done a guide for 1440 and 1080 instead
Also, I found a lot of the top streamers of tarkov like -NoGeneral Is running a old ish computer. I would think this being your profession/ career you would want to provide the best quality. Putting money back in to your business is important, but to each there own. Opinions are like ass holes everyone has one…
Nvidia really has screwed over gamers this gen with the insultingly low amount of Vram on the majority of their cards: 16GB should have been the *minimum* for any card allegedly aimed at 1440p gaming.
Something interesting is that SSR set to any quality will also brighten up foliage, and make spotting inside of them easier. Definitely use it if you can spare the slight fps cost.
Has anyone confirmed that upgrading to 32 gigs of ram helps? On streets my 16 gigs are usually around 91% utilization and runs horribly while the other maps hover around 60% and run beautifully.
Absolutely helped me. Before upgrading my RAM I literally couldn’t play Streets. It’d just crash at 100% every time. Now it actually runs decently, still laggier than other maps though.
just to point out something as far as CPU goes, the reason you can see low utilization % and still be CPU bottlenecked or limited is because tarkov probably isn't using all your cores. It's rare to see a game use more then about 4-6 cores on the CPU on even the most demanding games. However core count usage is not the only limit to your cpu performance. This is where the clock speed AKA the GHZ part of the cpu matters, basically the higher the clock speed the faster the individual cpu cores can process information. Think of this like running water through a pipe. Too small of a pipe (AKA not enough cores like a dual core or even most quad core CPUs) and the water is limited because of restriction in the flow, Too big of a pipe (aka a cpu with like 8 or more cores) and you wont have flow restriction, but realistically it wont use up the whole pipe it'll just be like a river flowing leaving the pipe half full. The GHZ or clock speed on the other hand is equated to how fast the water is flowing to begin with. Even in a smaller pipe a faster flow will increase pressure and allow you to basically force more water through the pipe albeit at a lesser efficiency due to the resistance basically capping you at a certain flow no matter how fast you push it. However lets say you have a big pipe AKA more cores, in this case you can basically increase the flow infinitely and it will go as fast as the water wants to go as there is no restriction in the flow based on the pipes size. TLDR basically a cpu with 16 cores will actually probably perform worse than say an 8 core CPU if the 8 Core CPU has a faster clock speed because Tarkov is not actually using the extra 8 cores that you get with the higher end CPU. That being said usually a CPU with more cores will come with higher clock speeds. It is however something to keep in mind if you are looking to upgrade your cpu. Task manager isn't the best at telling the full story basically so the utilization % is not a good metric of performance in game.
You keep saying "this doesn't seem to impact fps" but have you made sure your GPU is maxed out first? A setting might not make a difference because you have plenty of GPU to spare so enabling it doesn't max it out. But if your GPU is already maxed out, that setting could suddenly start impacting your FPS when you enable it cause you don't have GPU performance to spare for it. Advice will differ for users with a GPU bottleneck vs users with a CPU bottleneck. For example, on the MIP streaming one, this puts more load on your CPU and disk drive. So only recommended for GPU/VRAM bottlenecked systems. CPU bottlenecked systems should keep this off at all times. Also, for the sharpening, the one from the "Graphics" tab rather than Adaptive Sharpening seems to not stack with the painkiller sharpening effect. So I find that using the sharpening from the "Graphics" tab at around ~2.2 almost matches the painkiller effect and then when I take painkillers, I experience absolutely no difference cause I already have that much sharpness on and they don't seem to stack. Not so with the sharpening from the PostFX, which seems to stack on top of the sharpening from the painkillers and it makes things look absolutely awful and oversharpened when both are active.... unless this is what you were referring to when you mentioned the the bug around sharpness at 0?
So what should we do?(as a person who has a CPU Bottleneck, I have RTX 3080, 32 Gb 3200Mhz DDR4 Ram and i9-9900k, I use DLDSR to upscale my resolution from 1080p to 2k with DLSS, all of my in-game settings are maxed out(expect shadows, Object LOD Quality, Overall Visibility and other stuff like mip streaming, high quality color etc.). But still, my performance is not good on Streets.
Very good video and highly informative, as expected from you! However, I must admit I was a bit disappointed that you glossed over CPU usage when discussing FPS issues. You briefly showed CPU usage in Task Manager, then dismissed it as poor optimization, stating that it's "as good as Tarkov can do." This issue is often overlooked and should not be taken lightly. Most people simply say, "Tarkov has poor multi-threaded performance," yet rarely explain what that means. The FPS limit you can reach is largely dictated by your CPU's single-core performance. Many complain about low FPS while CPU usage remains low in Task Manager. If you right-click the CPU graph and change it to "Logical processors," you'll see one core is 100% utilized, while about 40-60% of the other cores are used (depending on your CPU), provided your GPU isn't the bottleneck. This leftover usage on the cores averages out to a lower overall usage on the graph, practically deceiving you about where your FPS issues stems from. Tarkov's optimization isn't good in general, but this specific issue has plagued the game for a long time without much attention. I have a decent computer: a 9700k with 8 cores running at 4.7 GHz, 32GB of RAM, and an RTX 3070. Yet on streets, I can only manage an unstable 50-60 FPS, which too often dips down to the low 30s, making it practically unplayable for me with a high refresh rate monitor. Functions like DLSS and FSR offer no boost to frame rate because I am bottlenecked by my CPU's single-core performance (as those options aim to decrease GPU usage, not CPU). The overall CPU usage might indicate something like 70%, while the GPU usage remains in the 30-40% range. Even at 1440p, it doesn't get enough frames to even lightly tax the GPU. Streets is the worst-case scenario; on Factory, I can average around 100 FPS with occasional dips, while on Customs, I'm bottlenecked by my GPU around 80 FPS at 1440p with dips to the 60-70s during intense fights. Even then, I'm leaving CPU usage on the table, as even with DLSS and FSR, I'll still be bottlenecked by my single-core performance and stuck at the same FPS but with lower GPU usage. I feel like I'm rambling a bit now, and I've just now noticed this video is 5 months old. The UA-cam algorithm made me think this was a new video. So I'll end on this note: BSG really needs to work on optimizing their multi-thread performance to more effectively increase FPS for all users in Tarkov. As it stands, 4-year-old processors are apparently too old to run Tarkov at a decent FPS. The game relies too heavily on single-core performance for the heavy lifting and doesn't do a good job distributing the load onto all cores. If you're looking to increase your FPS, please make sure you're not bottlenecked by your CPU first, because changing any of the options in the Graphics tab in Tarkov will mostly affect your GPU usage, not CPU. (MIP streaming and High-Quality Color do affect your CPU usage.)
Most notably, if I understand how it works correctly, MIP streaming effectively transfers load away from the GPU and over to the CPU (Because the CPU has to keep track of both high and low quality models, detect when they should be swapped, and swap them out) - So unless you're actually 100% maxing out your graphics card/VRAM regularly, there is no reason to ever turn it on, as chances are it will cost you more performance than it gives.
@@BackwardsPancake Exactly! And this is why all guides related to 'better fps' on Tarkov are mostly "wrong". I was really hoping Gigabeef would delve more into this but alas. I don't fault him though, as he went in to solve his GPU issues, not CPU - as he has the 'best Tarkov cpu' lol. But for others who don't have such budgets or simply don't want to upgrade to solve poor optimization issues for one game, it's a bit sad to see the lack of exposure on this. I guess I may have to write feedback on this on the BSG forums, but I feel like it won't really help much, outside of more widespread exposure. But glad to see others take their time to understand what settings does before saying to use things! Information like this needs to be more accessible for people. As CPU imbalance are likely the more prominent issue people have with performance over gpu.
I had 16 GB RAM and whenever I loaded into streets I got kicked out of the game. The support gave me a guide on how to use my ssd to get more performance. That and the low prices on DDR4 were the reason I upgraded on 32 GB. Still… it shouldn’t be a necessity to have more than 16 Gb RAM just for being able to play one map.
With mip streaming this issue gets completely solved, but end of raid screens takes from 1/2 to 5 minutes to appear, sometimes it crashes and you can't see who killed you, why and the healing screen that bothered me a lot. I think assigning the mip adjustments such as memory and usage to max solves that issue. But without it I can't load to streets or lighthouse without a blue screen
It makes me angry that I pay hundreds of dollars and I have to play the game on low settings, meanwhile I can play games like metro exodus on ultra with no problems. They should optimise the fucking game, it doesn't even look that good compared to other games...
Probably the worst guide i have ever seen on performance, shame as I like most of your other stuff. First of you should go into game and use fps 3 and actually watch the GPU ram use and see what is in use and what is in reserve,(not task manager) you don't hit the 8gb limit, your argument for this is you will have to swap textures/Data from RAM into you GPU, you then go onto talk about MIP streaming, that Caches Textures to you HDD that is even slower and uses even more CPU power this is why you see them swap, even tells you in game, I'd rather swap from RAM thanks.. Then you want people to use DLSS on top of switching there Textures to low, DLSS at quality is 960p, taking even more load from the GPU, then you want to apply post FX in game after turning everything else down or off, These settings make your game run trash and look even worse, push most of the load on the CPU and away from the GPU, The basis of Tarkovs issues... Edit, Also, please dont take this as talking down on any of your work as you put alot of time into it, Just this guide dose not work.
This guide isn't even useful for most people since most people play at 1080p. You aren't gonna use 8gb vram at 1080p unless maybe you turned on literally every setting
As far as I can tell FPS3 is extremely misleading as it says Tarkov is only using 3GB VRAM no matter what my settings are, which makes no sense. Whereas MSI tells me that on "High Textures" I'm literally at the 8GB limit and my 32GB of actual ram is nearly full
If you don't have a pc that is near your specs, it's still going to be crap frames for ya. I run EVERY map on lowest graphics settings, all extra crap turned off, stretched aspect ratio, and barebones (only necessary services, apps, tasks) PC and still get crap frames on that map. What you are doing is cool and all, but it's basically like trying to help us polish a turd... We need to hold BSG more accountable and demand a better performing game. The maps themselves actually run fine when they are completely empty, but when you introduce AI and Players into the equation, we go from maxed out FPS to lag, desync, stutter, and low FPS hell. They need to put some of that money they are lining their pockets with, and toss it into their game already. Nobody wants to buy a game for $150.00 and then build a PC for $3000.00+ and get 45-75 FPS on a game.
I like to use MSI afterburner + RTss that's built in to monitor in some cases it helps you show evektual bottlenecks. It's really easy to see especially if RAM or VRAM are an issue, and if GPU isn't 100% it's likely CPU bottleneck
gigabeef, your explanation videos are truly something else. You are easy to follow, listen to and overall you just provide a nice listening and viewing experience. Thank you.
not struggling to run streets, i run streets just fine. however, Nikita fucking hates his customers and therefore has made his game unplayable, by introducing some ridiculous bug that disconnects you from the game before you even join, but after your character and equipment have been committed, meaning you lose everything, every time.
Not only were your tips insanely good, and way better then almost all of the cookie cutter settings videos I've watched. But it was even better because I have the same exact cpu and gpu as you. You've finally made the game run for me like how people say it's supposed to with my specs. Thank you so much, another great video as always. 🍻
Hey GigaBeef ! Could you do a performance Update video once Patch 14.0 comes out ? ^^ maybe prepare some Before Scenes to Test the same Scenarios on the new unity update !. love your videos and Keep up the good work ! :Edit: Could you please Include the Scope Performance as well ? ^^
Good idea, I need to do more work on consistent testing because its actually really tough lol. Need to think about the methodology more before doing another :)
@@Gigabeef Offline no bots is defintly the best way to test FPS, i.e; if 1 settings gives more FPS than other on the same fps without bots, then its better. Maybe you could do a 30 seconds run on a specific path on streets that has dfferentes views and stuff to have an ''exact'' benchmark.
if a memory bottleneck is occuring then it will cause major stutters and or low fps because of waiting for textures to stream into gpu. if no memory bottleneck exist then texture resolution largley does not affect fps
they render the game twice unless it's a true 1x like iron sights or like the delta point, you will always lose frames because tarkov is rendering a secondary world that's zoomed in x times depending on your scope. bonus points if it's a valday or a vortex which has 2 different magnifications and they're always loaded in.. so you lose even more frames. they would have to completely change how scopes work, making them *not* render a completely different game inside the scope
In their first game (I forget the name but it’s a shooter on steam) they have an option to render the game twice in the scope like in Tarkov or just use what’s already being rendered on screen, it looks like ass but it works so much better
It is pretty much impossible to fix that. Maybe they could optimize it a little bit but I'd rather just give an option to turn PIP scopes off and zoom the whole screen in (maybe it turns PIP back on when you freelook)
the reason why is because when i look at my monitoring software on my left monitor my CPU is at 15% usage and my GPU is at 35% usage. god forbid i dont upgrade to the super special ryzen 5800x3d which only runs tarkov better and no other game.
Laughs in 20fps in FHD and 6gb vram and no DLSS available :D Anisotropic filtering mattered in times before Crysis... Nowdays it really doesn't matter and I don't understand why some games still offer different settings of that filtering (bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic x2-x16). And in short what it does, it handles proper look of textures that are on surfaces that are at low angle (like 10* between directly where you look and the wall 100m ahead) that's why stuff looks good all around with it on. HBAO imitates shadows of indirect light and in era of more and more raytracing capable games and gpu's it becomes irrelevant and to be fair? HBAO looks nice... On screenshots... Or when you camp in one spot and have nothing to do so you start to notice it (or lack of it if it's off).
It's so strange. I did in some random tests but it depended what was open - part of the struggle is it's different when recording too haha but no other way to get the footage!
Hmmm ... I wonder how much VRAM do you need for 4k High ... I have 3080 (10GB) and I was thinking I needed better CPU and RAM (I have i7 9th gen + 32GB DDR4) .... I guess I need to go streets to test my VRAM Well ... 10/10 GB used .... so yeah ... and my CPU is 100% too :D .... I guess my PC is weak -_- (and its not even true 4k but DLSS quality 4k ..)
just for any1 who said this didnt help im running on a GTX 1650 with a ryzen 5 2600 six core and i can deffo feel the difference strrets is playable to some degree im getting 40 frames instead of 20 :D
i have i7 12700kf, 32gb 3600mhz ddr4 ram, and a gtx3080 with 10gb VRAM and only get 40 frames on streets. ive tried everything in your video and others but cannot achieve playable frames on streets
man i need help > my videocard rtx 4080 working only on 30-45 % and fps 90-110 , when i go offline mode without scavs its going on 80-90% and fps 250+ . i cant understand why this shit game working like this
I am running the same setup…. Rtx3070 ryzen 7 5800x3d but I have 32ram…. Don’t sacrifice any of that stuff you do on here I just run dlss on quality and average about 130 fps… DM me I’ll send you my settings… I have been running streets since this wipe released while my friends were not able to play without issues
I love how this game looks like crap compared to current AAA titles, but the system requirement is at least double of them because of bad optimization, and with a 4500$ HAS TO BE SET to medium settings on streets because u cant keep a stable fps over 60-70. Why do we have 144 hz tho? Wish the original release of 1.0 we are waiting for is worth it, because this game is sometimes just feels bad to play even tho how great all the mechanics and gameplay elements are.
While EFT looks good, it really shouldnt run as bad as it does considering other games by big studios run better, and look better while also being theoritically more intensive on the CPU because they are singleplayer games and AI etc has to run on your own machine. (RDR2 for example) its fucking ridiculous that i need 32gigs of ram to run streets of tarkov.
3:50 I have AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and "only physical cores" kills my FPS. It drops by 10-15 frames and adds some freezes. My guess its performance depends on CPU type or some advanced CPU settings
the game seems to be more optimized in the gpu department, i run the game on mostly max settingS and only use about 25-40% of my gpu while using 100% of my cpu. But i do have a mean bottle neck so that probably isnt helping
All these nvidia cards with 8GB, 12GB of VRAM are such a trap. You're then forced to use low texture settings after spending all that money on the hardware.
(FPS) is Not all, The fact is many people steers blindly on having the highest FPS. For me I can sacrifice a couple frames for looks any day of the week, I don't wanna play in a freaking mud bath !
Isn't a single game that uses 100% cpu. Not about optimization, you can just never multithread everything for 8, 12 core, 16 core cpus. Lucky if it uses some of 4
I have the same hardware as you, but run everything on high, DLSS quality on 1440p ultra wide and get 100fps on most maps and 70+ on streets and light house?
I tried low texture quality and all items in the game look like they aren’t rendered entirely. No way I could play like that. I was having a hard time even discerning where lootable items were, they just look like blobs of texture
I have 32 gigs of ram. 3200mhz and streets as well as other maps use all 32gb since 13.1. They broke something I swear. I have to restart my game after every raid again to get back to my normal fps. auto ram cleaner makes my game hitch and lag badly.
I dont know if its just me, but i have an average of 60 70 fps with a 4070 and a ryzen 9 5900x with all in ultra, and i tried yout settings, and i got an average of 35 fps so i dont know what to think.
************UPDATED VERSION HERE: ua-cam.com/video/ZPlCf8e0p9g/v-deo.html
IMPORTANT CHANGES TO SETTINGS IN THAT VIDEO*****************
You explained every graphics setting better than 90% of 'visula overhaul' guides!
Thanks.. I was in turmoil about this video because it's so hard to test and know what works, even on just one system nevermind everyone else's. But hopefully there's something in there for everyone to try or at least learn about!
@@Gigabeef With the info you gave us in this video it became way easier to trial and error our own graphics settings. Now I know which setting does what and which settings are most likely to have an effect on fps.
A good portion of why this video is so useful is because you’ve very concisely explained each element with visual demonstrations. Now not only can I copy your well researched settings, should I choose I have the knowledge on how to modify them to best fit my needs. Well done as always
Thanks guys :) means a lot actually!
It’s always a pleasure go listen to GigaBeef. Videos are extremely informative, straight to the point, and idk what’s with his voice but I just find it really soothing.
Thanks for the years of high quality tarkov content, keep it up man.
Thanks so much!
I had my settings for quite a while now but I always had the feeling "it's not optimal yet".
I'm definitely looking over my settings again now with the new gained info from your video! :)
Thanks @Gigabeef! 🙂👍
Tarkov even managed to fill my 3060's 12 GB of VRAM, so lowering the texture quality gave an instant ~40% frame boost on streets offline
thx for this video man ! couldn´t even run maps like lighthouse cos my pc is a bit outdated. the tutorial helped a lot and now I can play all maps.
Oh my god, thank you so much Gigabeef. If I ever run into you IRL I'm buying you a beer
Haha thanks!
Oh my god this is what I’ve been needing lol, thank you so much
I have an Intel i7 12700f and rtx3060.. for me I get the same FPS on 1080 and 1440 p the only thing that changes is my GPU load which is very low for both and so the best thing that I found for this game is using DSR to scale from 4K down to 1440p on my 27-inch monitor and with dlss on either performance which is what Nvidia recommends for 4K for balanced the game looks incredible and my GPU load is finally around 80%
your game runs amazing man, reminds me of how this game runs on every single map like this but not on streets, very sad but i quit playing it until its actually playable. very nice video lad thanks for trying, its the though that counts !
Another thing I’ve noticed is that Streets tends to have memory leaks that persist between raids AND maps. Went from running Streets all day to customs, just for it to run at 30 FPS with the occasional 90FPS smoothness
that's a bug that came recently, it's not because of streets
@@nick9115 memory leaks being an issue "recently" lol glad I dropped this game a while ago
how new are you? this game has multiple memory leak bugs every wipe@@nick9115
what's funny is I basically have half of your specs ( like literally cut down the middle in terms of vram, ram, procession power,) And I run tarkov on high settings, never get a hitch
Damn, this even improved visibility, the only video that actually works, thank you!
Finally someone who actually explains this well thank you.
i have same specs you have fixed my fps ,I Had no clue about textures and vram being a problem , thanks
Great video Giga! I was always afraid of Mip Streaming until now
It causes some problems it seems with loading for some systems, but it's worth a shot
@@Gigabeef yeah, I tried it but my PC did NOT like it haha. I did adjust my PostFx a bit and the game looks much better
I was wondering why my GTX 1060 woke me up today to watch Gigabeef's new video... 😅
Instead of ingame postfx I use reshade - with smaa, adaptive sharpen and technicolor 2 enabled and EFT is spectacular.
Also as of now theres a huge memory leak. So if you start up tark and get on streets and its 60 to 70 fps but after a few raids its around 20 to 30 you need to restart the game
A game that came out so long ago has no business not running on an 8gig card properly they need to sort their shit out asap..
12gb vram is not enough for streets on 1440p high textures so if anyone is in the same situtation drop it to medium it fixes it instantly.
that's crazy, 12gb is a ton of memory
Even with 32 gigs it can be upwards of 28 gigs used on the new expansion
The reason is cause bsg doesnt give a fuck if the game works or not 😂
The fix-all is a recent generation CPU...
I am excited to test some of this on my machine using your video as a baseline
I hope that some of my observations will be helpful
but you know, youtube comment
Thanks for the video!
No problem! I went a bit crazy because even testing just on my machine is wildly inconsistent between offline and real raids, if I'm streaming vs when not... Its a total minefield to the point that I nearly didn't release this as I was so unsure of myself at one point 😅
Great vid
I used a vega 64 8gb with hbcc to make my system think the card had 64gb of VRAM(on a 256gb system). Streets pulled 22gb of vram and used 38gb of total system ram with lowest settings and high textures.
I was able to play streets finally after upgrading from a 9900k to a 12900k@5.2 all core. Even with a 3090 the 9900k could not keep up.
I also have i9 9900k with 3080 and my CPU just can't keep up with my GPU
How much RAM did you have? I was able to get the map to a playable state (90+ fps) by upgrading to 32 GB of RAM using a 9600k and a 2070 super. Streets devours a boatload of RAM when loading, and the memory leaks don't make the matters any better.
@@Laggiter97 I had 32 and now have 32 of DDR5. I also play on 2560x1440.
If youre at 1080p all you need to get 100+ fps is a really good x3d cpu and a decent gpu like 3070
I have a 3090, 7950x3d, and 64gb of DDR5 6000 and this map still runs terrible in 1440p. I checked my task manager trying to figure out why, but nothing was near to maxed out. 😞
Ok, i have a Rtx 3060, 12Gb YET on the fps 2/3 i cant recall, it only shows its using 3gb. if this is teh case i would be aswell go back to using my ATI R9 280. (This was posted as soon as beef stated the "VRAM" on the screen, Just had to get it out there).
The rest of the pc, was an upgrade from a MSI z87 g45, 4770K, 32gb 2666 & the ATI saphirre R9 280 (this was in xfire as when i got the system i got 2)
New spec - MSI B550 A pro, Ryzen 5600x not OC, 32gb corsair 3200, Zotac rtx 3060 12gb.
Something that I believe has been confirmed is that shadows on anything under High, will be using the CPU rather than the GPU. Which will make a difference depending on your system.
If you have a good GPU and meh CPU, then High Shadows is best.
if i was rich i would buy a ferrarri not a honda cevic
It's not... That is a myth. Pull up MSI Afterburner and monitor your CPU usage and FPS in game. Cranking shadows does not lower CPU usage and your FPS drop in game when shadows are raised, unless you have a pretty damn good PC build.
@@bozojoe197 I know it used to be true. So it will have been fixed at some point, if what you are saying is accurate.
I don't want to do the testing and I don't have frame rate concerns. So I'll just take your word for it and assume they fixed it.
DLSS and the quality of life features are the biggest ups to this wipe. But unfornately the CPU bottlenecking still needs optimisation. I found my settings and it doesn't get better than this at 50-70fps
postfx test with "clarity" and "adaptive sharpness" both points eat fps, I play without them and everything is ok
A few years ago i did a video comparing ram speed in tarkov, to this day the video get comments that testing in offline raids is useless etc
But these people don't understand that it's impossible to get reliable results in online raids
Hope you don't get these comments 👍
Haha damned in offline, damned in online... sure is tough to figure stuff out!
Bravo!
Ive seen my 3090 hit 16gb of Vram usage in task manager on lighthouse @1440p. Also for CPU if you see low percentage usage in task manger that’s because that number is the overall usage of all the cores but if you use a software that can show per core usage you’ll notice tarkov will probably be maxing out 1-2 cores. Wish the game just ran better for people who don’t have access to expensive builds. Hope they actually make some good improvements like promised in the coming updates
It's allocated, not used
Ram cleaner doesn’t work either other than 1st raid. I use a ram cleaner program with lasso with my new 7800x3D and 7900XTX & get over 200 fps in 1440p on high settings new mip streaming
Would you mind sharing your nvidia control panel settings as well?
Sure i.imgur.com/dQI1tjj.png
Best graphics run down for your average tarkov gamer that I've ever seen.
Also, Streets is now playable for me. Thank you.
Glad to hear it!
Me struggling to make the game run on lowest seettings with reduced resolution on my gtx 1050 with 2gb vram and crap internet that dc's me one in every 10 raids
Bro why you run low graphic with qhd ? lower resolutiion thats it and you can run medium or low without mip streaming
you should mention you play at 1440p because most people are at 1080p which is less gpu bound than 1440p. On 1080p i would get 50-70% gpu usage but at 1440p i get 80-95% on streets (lower on easier to run maps). The game will also use more VRAM at 1440p but at 1080p even just 6gb is enough. Should've done a guide for 1440 and 1080 instead
He did. You can also see the resolution in the settings menu... Which this video is a lot about.
Are you ok?
@@Od4n are you stupid? i said to make a guide with both
LOD Quality tanks cpu performance like crazy
Nice one bro
mate, my pc bluescreens when i startup streets. it bluescreens in the loading screen 😭😭.
I have 12 GB of Vram 32 GB of reg Ram and still noly have 60 fps on streets and sometimes it drops to 40
What should my nvidia reflex setting be on?
I went from 80fps to 130+. Ty giga
What specs u got?
Im running 32gb ram and rtx 2070 super, this could help alot, gotta try changing up settings. thx!
Also, I found a lot of the top streamers of tarkov like -NoGeneral
Is running a old ish computer.
I would think this being your profession/ career you would want to provide the best quality. Putting money back in to your business is important, but to each there own.
Opinions are like ass holes everyone has one…
Nvidia really has screwed over gamers this gen with the insultingly low amount of Vram on the majority of their cards: 16GB should have been the *minimum* for any card allegedly aimed at 1440p gaming.
you struggle because of PC issues
I struggle because I am terrible at the game
we are not the same
Probably the best Tarkov performance video I've seen in years, especially due to your consideration for the game's atmosphere and fidelity.
Hey thanks!
Something interesting is that SSR set to any quality will also brighten up foliage, and make spotting inside of them easier. Definitely use it if you can spare the slight fps cost.
Has anyone confirmed that upgrading to 32 gigs of ram helps? On streets my 16 gigs are usually around 91% utilization and runs horribly while the other maps hover around 60% and run beautifully.
Absolutely helped me. Before upgrading my RAM I literally couldn’t play Streets. It’d just crash at 100% every time. Now it actually runs decently, still laggier than other maps though.
meanwhile my 3GB vram 1050 💀💀💀💀💀
I hope you have a chance to upgrade soon. Gpu prices are dropping making it "easier" to get a decent card.
just to point out something as far as CPU goes, the reason you can see low utilization % and still be CPU bottlenecked or limited is because tarkov probably isn't using all your cores. It's rare to see a game use more then about 4-6 cores on the CPU on even the most demanding games. However core count usage is not the only limit to your cpu performance. This is where the clock speed AKA the GHZ part of the cpu matters, basically the higher the clock speed the faster the individual cpu cores can process information. Think of this like running water through a pipe. Too small of a pipe (AKA not enough cores like a dual core or even most quad core CPUs) and the water is limited because of restriction in the flow, Too big of a pipe (aka a cpu with like 8 or more cores) and you wont have flow restriction, but realistically it wont use up the whole pipe it'll just be like a river flowing leaving the pipe half full. The GHZ or clock speed on the other hand is equated to how fast the water is flowing to begin with. Even in a smaller pipe a faster flow will increase pressure and allow you to basically force more water through the pipe albeit at a lesser efficiency due to the resistance basically capping you at a certain flow no matter how fast you push it. However lets say you have a big pipe AKA more cores, in this case you can basically increase the flow infinitely and it will go as fast as the water wants to go as there is no restriction in the flow based on the pipes size. TLDR basically a cpu with 16 cores will actually probably perform worse than say an 8 core CPU if the 8 Core CPU has a faster clock speed because Tarkov is not actually using the extra 8 cores that you get with the higher end CPU. That being said usually a CPU with more cores will come with higher clock speeds. It is however something to keep in mind if you are looking to upgrade your cpu. Task manager isn't the best at telling the full story basically so the utilization % is not a good metric of performance in game.
I feel like this is a myth because tarkov uses all the cores on my CPU the only thing is it only uses like 25 to 30 percent of each core 😅
You keep saying "this doesn't seem to impact fps" but have you made sure your GPU is maxed out first? A setting might not make a difference because you have plenty of GPU to spare so enabling it doesn't max it out. But if your GPU is already maxed out, that setting could suddenly start impacting your FPS when you enable it cause you don't have GPU performance to spare for it. Advice will differ for users with a GPU bottleneck vs users with a CPU bottleneck. For example, on the MIP streaming one, this puts more load on your CPU and disk drive. So only recommended for GPU/VRAM bottlenecked systems. CPU bottlenecked systems should keep this off at all times.
Also, for the sharpening, the one from the "Graphics" tab rather than Adaptive Sharpening seems to not stack with the painkiller sharpening effect. So I find that using the sharpening from the "Graphics" tab at around ~2.2 almost matches the painkiller effect and then when I take painkillers, I experience absolutely no difference cause I already have that much sharpness on and they don't seem to stack. Not so with the sharpening from the PostFX, which seems to stack on top of the sharpening from the painkillers and it makes things look absolutely awful and oversharpened when both are active.... unless this is what you were referring to when you mentioned the the bug around sharpness at 0?
So what should we do?(as a person who has a CPU Bottleneck, I have RTX 3080, 32 Gb 3200Mhz DDR4 Ram and i9-9900k, I use DLDSR to upscale my resolution from 1080p to 2k with DLSS, all of my in-game settings are maxed out(expect shadows, Object LOD Quality, Overall Visibility and other stuff like mip streaming, high quality color etc.). But still, my performance is not good on Streets.
Very good video and highly informative, as expected from you! However, I must admit I was a bit disappointed that you glossed over CPU usage when discussing FPS issues. You briefly showed CPU usage in Task Manager, then dismissed it as poor optimization, stating that it's "as good as Tarkov can do." This issue is often overlooked and should not be taken lightly. Most people simply say, "Tarkov has poor multi-threaded performance," yet rarely explain what that means. The FPS limit you can reach is largely dictated by your CPU's single-core performance. Many complain about low FPS while CPU usage remains low in Task Manager. If you right-click the CPU graph and change it to "Logical processors," you'll see one core is 100% utilized, while about 40-60% of the other cores are used (depending on your CPU), provided your GPU isn't the bottleneck. This leftover usage on the cores averages out to a lower overall usage on the graph, practically deceiving you about where your FPS issues stems from. Tarkov's optimization isn't good in general, but this specific issue has plagued the game for a long time without much attention.
I have a decent computer: a 9700k with 8 cores running at 4.7 GHz, 32GB of RAM, and an RTX 3070. Yet on streets, I can only manage an unstable 50-60 FPS, which too often dips down to the low 30s, making it practically unplayable for me with a high refresh rate monitor. Functions like DLSS and FSR offer no boost to frame rate because I am bottlenecked by my CPU's single-core performance (as those options aim to decrease GPU usage, not CPU). The overall CPU usage might indicate something like 70%, while the GPU usage remains in the 30-40% range. Even at 1440p, it doesn't get enough frames to even lightly tax the GPU. Streets is the worst-case scenario; on Factory, I can average around 100 FPS with occasional dips, while on Customs, I'm bottlenecked by my GPU around 80 FPS at 1440p with dips to the 60-70s during intense fights. Even then, I'm leaving CPU usage on the table, as even with DLSS and FSR, I'll still be bottlenecked by my single-core performance and stuck at the same FPS but with lower GPU usage.
I feel like I'm rambling a bit now, and I've just now noticed this video is 5 months old. The UA-cam algorithm made me think this was a new video. So I'll end on this note: BSG really needs to work on optimizing their multi-thread performance to more effectively increase FPS for all users in Tarkov. As it stands, 4-year-old processors are apparently too old to run Tarkov at a decent FPS. The game relies too heavily on single-core performance for the heavy lifting and doesn't do a good job distributing the load onto all cores. If you're looking to increase your FPS, please make sure you're not bottlenecked by your CPU first, because changing any of the options in the Graphics tab in Tarkov will mostly affect your GPU usage, not CPU. (MIP streaming and High-Quality Color do affect your CPU usage.)
Most notably, if I understand how it works correctly, MIP streaming effectively transfers load away from the GPU and over to the CPU (Because the CPU has to keep track of both high and low quality models, detect when they should be swapped, and swap them out) - So unless you're actually 100% maxing out your graphics card/VRAM regularly, there is no reason to ever turn it on, as chances are it will cost you more performance than it gives.
@@BackwardsPancake Exactly! And this is why all guides related to 'better fps' on Tarkov are mostly "wrong". I was really hoping Gigabeef would delve more into this but alas. I don't fault him though, as he went in to solve his GPU issues, not CPU - as he has the 'best Tarkov cpu' lol. But for others who don't have such budgets or simply don't want to upgrade to solve poor optimization issues for one game, it's a bit sad to see the lack of exposure on this. I guess I may have to write feedback on this on the BSG forums, but I feel like it won't really help much, outside of more widespread exposure.
But glad to see others take their time to understand what settings does before saying to use things! Information like this needs to be more accessible for people. As CPU imbalance are likely the more prominent issue people have with performance over gpu.
I had 16 GB RAM and whenever I loaded into streets I got kicked out of the game. The support gave me a guide on how to use my ssd to get more performance.
That and the low prices on DDR4 were the reason I upgraded on 32 GB. Still… it shouldn’t be a necessity to have more than 16 Gb RAM just for being able to play one map.
With mip streaming this issue gets completely solved, but end of raid screens takes from 1/2 to 5 minutes to appear, sometimes it crashes and you can't see who killed you, why and the healing screen that bothered me a lot.
I think assigning the mip adjustments such as memory and usage to max solves that issue. But without it I can't load to streets or lighthouse without a blue screen
I fixed this by simply going from high to medium textures.
5800x3D CPU video here: ua-cam.com/video/XC1ajQIT8M8/v-deo.html
Even Nikita said it needs RAM, so try 32GB if you can budget it, to anyone that finds this.
90 frames? But tarbob reddit said x3d best chip lul
it is? what's your point here?@@genuwhine6782
It makes me angry that I pay hundreds of dollars and I have to play the game on low settings, meanwhile I can play games like metro exodus on ultra with no problems. They should optimise the fucking game, it doesn't even look that good compared to other games...
Probably the worst guide i have ever seen on performance, shame as I like most of your other stuff.
First of you should go into game and use fps 3 and actually watch the GPU ram use and see what is in use and what is in reserve,(not task manager) you don't hit the 8gb limit, your argument for this is you will have to swap textures/Data from RAM into you GPU, you then go onto talk about MIP streaming, that Caches Textures to you HDD that is even slower and uses even more CPU power this is why you see them swap, even tells you in game, I'd rather swap from RAM thanks.. Then you want people to use DLSS on top of switching there Textures to low, DLSS at quality is 960p, taking even more load from the GPU, then you want to apply post FX in game after turning everything else down or off, These settings make your game run trash and look even worse, push most of the load on the CPU and away from the GPU, The basis of Tarkovs issues...
Edit,
Also, please dont take this as talking down on any of your work as you put alot of time into it, Just this guide dose not work.
This guide isn't even useful for most people since most people play at 1080p. You aren't gonna use 8gb vram at 1080p unless maybe you turned on literally every setting
@@squidwardo7074 agreed, He has done 0 homework on this, and just copy pasted from old guides.
As far as I can tell FPS3 is extremely misleading as it says Tarkov is only using 3GB VRAM no matter what my settings are, which makes no sense. Whereas MSI tells me that on "High Textures" I'm literally at the 8GB limit and my 32GB of actual ram is nearly full
Just optimize the fking game.. i had 90+ fps but since the last patch everything went to shit just on streets
Guys, no joke.
Bought my 4080, 13900k, 32gb 6400mhz CL36 recently and now have stable FPS 144 on streets!
Heavily recommend, easiest FPS boost!
in offline mode
In online mode?
If you don't have a pc that is near your specs, it's still going to be crap frames for ya. I run EVERY map on lowest graphics settings, all extra crap turned off, stretched aspect ratio, and barebones (only necessary services, apps, tasks) PC and still get crap frames on that map. What you are doing is cool and all, but it's basically like trying to help us polish a turd... We need to hold BSG more accountable and demand a better performing game. The maps themselves actually run fine when they are completely empty, but when you introduce AI and Players into the equation, we go from maxed out FPS to lag, desync, stutter, and low FPS hell. They need to put some of that money they are lining their pockets with, and toss it into their game already. Nobody wants to buy a game for $150.00 and then build a PC for $3000.00+ and get 45-75 FPS on a game.
Polishing a turd is at least better than just taking it straight up 🤣
I like to use MSI afterburner + RTss that's built in to monitor in some cases it helps you show evektual bottlenecks. It's really easy to see especially if RAM or VRAM are an issue, and if GPU isn't 100% it's likely CPU bottleneck
gigabeef, your explanation videos are truly something else. You are easy to follow, listen to and overall you just provide a nice listening and viewing experience. Thank you.
Thanks! Appreciate ya :)
not struggling to run streets, i run streets just fine. however, Nikita fucking hates his customers and therefore has made his game unplayable, by introducing some ridiculous bug that disconnects you from the game before you even join, but after your character and equipment have been committed, meaning you lose everything, every time.
@gigabeef what about NVIDIA RELEX LOW LATENCY?
Just turn it on, I don't bother with boost because I'm pretty sure it just uses more power for no real gain
Not only were your tips insanely good, and way better then almost all of the cookie cutter settings videos I've watched.
But it was even better because I have the same exact cpu and gpu as you. You've finally made the game run for me like how people say it's supposed to with my specs. Thank you so much, another great video as always. 🍻
Hey GigaBeef ! Could you do a performance Update video once Patch 14.0 comes out ? ^^ maybe prepare some Before Scenes to Test the same Scenarios on the new unity update !.
love your videos and Keep up the good work !
:Edit:
Could you please Include the Scope Performance as well ? ^^
Good idea, I need to do more work on consistent testing because its actually really tough lol. Need to think about the methodology more before doing another :)
@@Gigabeef 💖 we can also observe the Ram/Vram consumption
@@Gigabeef Offline no bots is defintly the best way to test FPS, i.e; if 1 settings gives more FPS than other on the same fps without bots, then its better. Maybe you could do a 30 seconds run on a specific path on streets that has dfferentes views and stuff to have an ''exact'' benchmark.
DLSS makes Tarkov blurry; has a bigger impact on ‘bluriness’ than anything else
I've done extensive testing on my 3070 and there is zero difference in performance between high and low textures or shadows.
if a memory bottleneck is occuring then it will cause major stutters and or low fps because of waiting for textures to stream into gpu. if no memory bottleneck exist then texture resolution largley does not affect fps
SAME dude i cantget past 60 fps on streets with any settings its not caped ive tried all settings so many different ones
now all we need is them to change the way magnified scopes work since they drop fps immensely
tried on streets and 1/3 of frames are gone when you scope in
they render the game twice
unless it's a true 1x like iron sights or like the delta point, you will always lose frames because tarkov is rendering a secondary world that's zoomed in x times depending on your scope. bonus points if it's a valday or a vortex which has 2 different magnifications and they're always loaded in.. so you lose even more frames.
they would have to completely change how scopes work, making them *not* render a completely different game inside the scope
In their first game (I forget the name but it’s a shooter on steam) they have an option to render the game twice in the scope like in Tarkov or just use what’s already being rendered on screen, it looks like ass but it works so much better
It is pretty much impossible to fix that. Maybe they could optimize it a little bit but I'd rather just give an option to turn PIP scopes off and zoom the whole screen in (maybe it turns PIP back on when you freelook)
They just need to let us close one eye so it only renders inside the scope. Many would give up their peripheral vision to scope in >60fps I am sure
the reason why is because when i look at my monitoring software on my left monitor my CPU is at 15% usage and my GPU is at 35% usage.
god forbid i dont upgrade to the super special ryzen 5800x3d which only runs tarkov better and no other game.
One note DLSS has side effect too it will lower your vram because you are runnning in Quality mode (66% of your native resolution 1440P)
this map looks like PS2 graphic game but poorly optimize even core i9 feel stuttering to run it
Laughs in 20fps in FHD and 6gb vram and no DLSS available :D
Anisotropic filtering mattered in times before Crysis... Nowdays it really doesn't matter and I don't understand why some games still offer different settings of that filtering (bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic x2-x16).
And in short what it does, it handles proper look of textures that are on surfaces that are at low angle (like 10* between directly where you look and the wall 100m ahead) that's why stuff looks good all around with it on.
HBAO imitates shadows of indirect light and in era of more and more raytracing capable games and gpu's it becomes irrelevant and to be fair? HBAO looks nice... On screenshots... Or when you camp in one spot and have nothing to do so you start to notice it (or lack of it if it's off).
Weirdly I get much more FPS in borderless mode. Tarkov is so weird with settings.
It's so strange. I did in some random tests but it depended what was open - part of the struggle is it's different when recording too haha but no other way to get the footage!
@@Gigabeef I can only imagine. Still, your guide was extremely helpful and gave me about 20 FPS so thanks! :)
Hmmm ... I wonder how much VRAM do you need for 4k High ... I have 3080 (10GB) and I was thinking I needed better CPU and RAM (I have i7 9th gen + 32GB DDR4) .... I guess I need to go streets to test my VRAM
Well ... 10/10 GB used .... so yeah ... and my CPU is 100% too :D .... I guess my PC is weak -_-
(and its not even true 4k but DLSS quality 4k ..)
Since everyone is CPU bound pretty much in this game shouldn't everybody be using Reflex on plus boost?
just for any1 who said this didnt help im running on a GTX 1650 with a ryzen 5 2600 six core and i can deffo feel the difference strrets is playable to some degree im getting 40 frames instead of 20 :D
i have i7 12700kf, 32gb 3600mhz ddr4 ram, and a gtx3080 with 10gb VRAM and only get 40 frames on streets. ive tried everything in your video and others but cannot achieve playable frames on streets
man i need help > my videocard rtx 4080 working only on 30-45 % and fps 90-110 , when i go offline mode without scavs its going on 80-90% and fps 250+ . i cant understand why this shit game working like this
I am running the same setup…. Rtx3070 ryzen 7 5800x3d but I have 32ram…. Don’t sacrifice any of that stuff you do on here I just run dlss on quality and average about 130 fps… DM me I’ll send you my settings… I have been running streets since this wipe released while my friends were not able to play without issues
I love how this game looks like crap compared to current AAA titles, but the system requirement is at least double of them because of bad optimization, and with a 4500$ HAS TO BE SET to medium settings on streets because u cant keep a stable fps over 60-70. Why do we have 144 hz tho?
Wish the original release of 1.0 we are waiting for is worth it, because this game is sometimes just feels bad to play even tho how great all the mechanics and gameplay elements are.
While EFT looks good, it really shouldnt run as bad as it does considering other games by big studios run better, and look better while also being theoritically more intensive on the CPU because they are singleplayer games and AI etc has to run on your own machine. (RDR2 for example) its fucking ridiculous that i need 32gigs of ram to run streets of tarkov.
12.23 I'm worth it FeelsGoodMan
3:50 I have AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 and "only physical cores" kills my FPS. It drops by 10-15 frames and adds some freezes. My guess its performance depends on CPU type or some advanced CPU settings
the game seems to be more optimized in the gpu department, i run the game on mostly max settingS and only use about 25-40% of my gpu while using 100% of my cpu. But i do have a mean bottle neck so that probably isnt helping
@@Red_Cp3try DSR it works amazingly
All these nvidia cards with 8GB, 12GB of VRAM are such a trap. You're then forced to use low texture settings after spending all that money on the hardware.
(FPS) is Not all, The fact is many people steers blindly on having the highest FPS. For me I can sacrifice a couple frames for looks any day of the week, I don't wanna play in a freaking mud bath !
Isn't a single game that uses 100% cpu. Not about optimization, you can just never multithread everything for 8, 12 core, 16 core cpus. Lucky if it uses some of 4
I have the same hardware as you, but run everything on high, DLSS quality on 1440p ultra wide and get 100fps on most maps and 70+ on streets and light house?
Im really lucky never had any problems with my RTX 3060 with 12gb of VRAM. Although its not the best card anymore sadly.
Microsoft: 640K is more memory than anyone will ever need
Nvidia: 8GB is more than enough VRAM.
Gamers in 2023: 😠😡🤬
I tried low texture quality and all items in the game look like they aren’t rendered entirely. No way I could play like that. I was having a hard time even discerning where lootable items were, they just look like blobs of texture
I have 32 gigs of ram. 3200mhz and streets as well as other maps use all 32gb since 13.1. They broke something I swear. I have to restart my game after every raid again to get back to my normal fps. auto ram cleaner makes my game hitch and lag badly.
on windows 11 if i alt tab out, the game runs the risk of crashing to the point i have to force a restart. never had that problem on windows 10
I dont know if its just me, but i have an average of 60 70 fps with a 4070 and a ryzen 9 5900x with all in ultra, and i tried yout settings, and i got an average of 35 fps so i dont know what to think.