From where they currently are, the Ukrainians can already cover the Kursk region with different missiles, rockets and drones. Since the use of ATACMs is restricted to the same region, I cannot see how much difference they will make. Ukraine hasn't a lot of them either, and its war head is relatively small. They certainly do not make a difference in the Donbas, where the Russians have been advancing for months. A lot of hype in the media.
Ukraine was given permission to hit targets threatening their forces in Kursk.That likely means Ukraine can drive ATACMS launchers into the occupied Kursk region and launch them deep into Russia to hit targets beyond the reach of existing drones,rockets and other missile systems.
this conflict which has nothing to do with the countries supplying the weapons will escalate what could end up to be a possible WW3 , there will always be dispute between countries but there should be no outside interference unless it directly affects them and their citizens
@@sebastiaanl9876 what a pointless ridiculous statement. They didnt say they were unhappy watching this. They were commenting on the video CONTENT. Do keep up. Wow.
You and I all know it will definitely change nothing, it's not like they were used before to strike within disputed territories but did almost nothing to help on the battlefield.
Why would Russia escalate to nuclear war when they only have to wait another 2 months for their meat puppet Trump to bail them out of their own botched war of conquest? Biden is simply improving Ukraine's negotiating position by giving them the ability to do as much damage on the Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been doing to Kyiv.
but russia is using north korea and iranian weapons in ukraine. What difference does this make? Russia has escalated ut already. The west should stop being puss
“Why do they (Brits and Francs) need US’s permission to use their missiles” 😅 the question caught the guest unprepared. He was probably thinking: what do you want me to say?
You are right, and to read Annie Jacobsen's book: NUCLEAR. There would be no 'winners'. NO leader should EVER think about using NUCLEAR weapons as a last resort, but nearly all Nato countries have them. We are all run by evil people.
These weapons could be used in the direction of Crimea but they have made no difference to progress in that direction so I don't see they will change much in another direction.
Its F-16s and Leopard 2 that were seen as war winners. They still could be since Russia is likely not going to achive its primary strategic goal of over running Ukraine and replacing the Zelinsky government by force of arms.
They didn’t get f-15 planes and are still integrating the f-16’s into their air defense systems (and they’re already successful with 11 cruise missiles shot down in the last big attack).
F-16 planes. You are so uneducated that you can't even get that right. Besides the west only supplied the minimal amount of tanks, at a slow pace....did you expect one sword in an army to win the tide?
@@ronin7531 Shooting down 11 cruise missiles in one attack with just a couple of planes working with an integrated air defense system that includes ancient stuff like BUK and HAWK AA is quite impressive. And when did Zelenskyy say that f15’s or anything else would be a silver bullet? He only said that it will help to defend against russian attacks and that it would save Ukrainian lives (and it did both). But go on and try to justify the average of 1500 russian losses per day for the last two months, it’s just day 1001 in russia’s three day special military operation.
Is firing British missiles into Russia a threat to British national security? Because British millitary personnel have to programme these missiles before some Ukrainian finger pushes the button
Yes, this obvious fact is deliberately omitted in BBC and other mainstream media reports. Targets are identified, acquired and targeted by US military using their satellites. It is credibly reported that US troops are in Ukraine overseeing the set-up of the missiles.
The UK Govt put a post stating they would allow using storm-shadow missiles in Russia but then they removed the post. Looks like they changed their mind hahahaha!!
You have brain. They just want to hear that Russia is humiliated regardless of what Ukraine will hit with the so called long range missile. The good thing is that, the consequence of the this move will bring the war to and end. Putin has been acting saintly, but will hit hard if Ukraine hit sensitive sites in Russia. His retaliatory actions in Ukraine will force the world to negotiate for peace.
I think they closed the gas pipe going through .. to South of Europe. Perhaps they might even restrick laudenring of oil and other minerals through India.
"I must break you" "If he dies, he dies" "You will lose" "To the end" "He is not human, he is a piece of iron" "I win for me! FOR ME!" "I defeat all man. Soon I defeat real champion" "I can not be defeated. I beat all man. Someday, I will beat a real champion. If he dies, he dies" 🇦🇺
Tentu saja itu akan merubah permainan, yaitu, Rusia menganggap anda sedang berperang melawan mereka, dan kita akan segera melihat wajib militer menimpa para pemuda eropa. Ekonomi hancur dan rakyat menderita di garis depan. Sementara kami melihat kalian di tv. Sunguh menyedihkan
I'd guess strategic targets, ammunition depots, troop concentrations, railway links. That kind of thing will be a target. It's not a 'wonder' weapon. However, the cumulative effect slows resupply. It means staging weapons platforms further back.
This is exactly the reason why Russia kept asking NATO for 30 years not to move their frontier (and therefore missile dome) closer to Russia from the post Cold War lines, which is why NATO forced Russia to eventually push back. We’re not the good guys here. If we’d just left Eastern Europe alone, this war wouldn’t be happening.
@ it is objectively and observably true now that the missiles Yeltsin didn’t want pointing into his front garden will soon be arriving. Stop drinking the kool aid mate - we caused this war because the globalist bankers can’t control Russia. Wake up.
@ It does if that alliances only purpose is to oppose you. Corporate Globalist banking cabal bot. You go and fight on the front lines of the war you crave then. Send your kids (if you have any, which I doubt)
@cristiangaban960 100% true, but you are either wildly misinformed or part of the misinformation brigade, and I'm 100% British not a Putin apologist. Only psychopsths can support what the US neocons have fomented in Ukraine. Now get off to school, you're late.
US doesn't have hypersonic missiles (they stopped this development since it's too expensive and they don't believe they need it). Russia, China, North Korea all have good hypersonic rockets with competitive prices (if you are interested): like Iran, Saudi, Brasil or even Mexico...
I agree with you. The US has a large air fleet and aircraft carriers. Let's imagine that Washington hits Moscow with missiles. Moscow can respond to Washington. But Moscow can escalate at other levels as well. For example, help US enemies attack numerous NATO bases in the EU. What will the US do? Send aircraft carriers to help across the ocean. The presence of hypersonic weapons in Russia will show that US aircraft carriers in a modern conflict are large, unwieldy troughs with a large crew.
What are you smoking? The US is hard at work on hypersonic weapons to match the Chinese who are seen as America's true geostrategic rival,not Russia. Several tests have been conducted at US Pacific ranges using B-52s as launching platforms. When you cite Russia,China, and North Korea, perhaps you mean, land based moblie systems vs aircraft or ship launched ones,but even in that case the US Army is in development of mobile systems that could be deployed in the Philippines to put Chinese targets in the South China Sea at risk. The US doesn't have deployed hypersonic missile systems,not because we don't believe we need it,but because their development was forbidden by the Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile Treaty with the USSR/Russia.China never signed any such treaty and has been free to develop Hypersonic missiles for years. When the US saw that Russia was carrying out its own development program in violation of treaty,the US walked away as well. It just a question of how long until the US catches up.
@@Oleg_lvanov And yet China is embarked on a aircraft carrier building boom alongside the US,the British and the Japanese. Even France has a new aircraft carrier in the planning stages. All those nations are maritime nations who depend on global trade vs being a gas station with nukes as Russia is.
@@TheLAGopher Lots of text - little sense. When I talk about hypersonics, I mean their speeds and the ability to maneuver at such speeds. The Russian Federation has hypersonics in service. The US is still at the testing stage, i.e. they are a generation behind in the production of such weapons. Countries are divided into maritime powers (USA, UK) and continental powers (Russia, Iran). When you talk about Russia as a gas station, you have poison dripping from your fangs.
So BBC is telling us that putin will withdraw his army from ukraine because of some missiles?😂, I wonder what theyll tell us after Russia responds with more missiles at ukraine and more territory
Russia is already responding with more missiles at Ukraine for 3 years. We are being told that the more damage Ukraine can inflct into Russia the better negotiating position they are in to get Russians to withdraw from Ukraine in exchange to get back Kursk. Any negotiations would have to be from a basis of Russia giving up something to get something and not just rely on a Trump imposed peace deal where current front lines are frozen. Russia doesn't want parts of Kursk incorporated into Ukraine if the frontlines were frozen,so to get their land back,they had better trade back Ukrainian land in return.
The biggest concern is the escalation of No. Korea being involved. They wouldn't be there if Russia had half the capabilities that these drama queen reporters say they do. They need a solution NOW.
All newer weapons supplied or authorised for use by Ukraine have always been described as "game changers." This is not new either. The rhetorics and analyses are becoming boring. Just admit NATO has failed to beat Russia.
Putin knows he will have many pointed back at him he does not want Russia bombed i remember the last time they threatened us when Ragan was in power it was a real threat but this time I think not
👈🤡YES THE UNELECTED 🤡 PUTIN WHO STARTED THIS WAR IS A PSYCHOPATH. PUTIN COULD STOP THIS WAR IN AN HOUR ALL HE HAS TO DO IS PULL OUT OF UKRAINE AND STOP HIS LAND GRABS.
Venturing into crypto as a newbie was very difficult due to lack of experience which resulted in loosing funds......... But Lucille Friedman, restored hope shes a good woman
You have a LOT of patience! Zelensky 'begging' for weapons and money to fight his near neighbour, has been grating on my nerves since the beginning! Because this is America's proxy war with Russia, Z. has been fawned over and indulged. He isn't even the legitimate President of Ukraine, since 20th? May this year. He is already a very wealthy man, but morally bankrupt. And I think he will NEVER know a moment 's peace for the rest of his life.
What happened to other game changers like the once hyped F-16's,Abram or Challenger tanks and so funny Russia has been destroying and jamming the very same depleted useless Atacms and Storm Shadows and they have failed dismaly to bring down the Crimean bridge due to highly advanced Russian air defence systems like the S-400 for example.
bring it on, you think that such an action won't bring about the full force of NATO against russia? We're giving ukraine our old weapons mostly, russia hasn't seen the advanced stuff in action....when the f22, euro fighter, f35, b2 stealth and so many others turn their attention to russia, you'll find out just what can happen if you start a war with most of the richest nations in the world.
Russia is only being targeted in its own country because it is directing missiles against Ukrainian targets in Ukraine. Its the Ukrainians directing missiles into Russia in self defense.Not the US or UK.
Grown ass dudes looking for North Koreans in the field but can’t find any because they don’t deem russia worthy of defending, even they have toilets at home.
The Russians are not going to do anything when they can wait for their buddy Donald Trump to get into office in 2 months with his "Peace" deal. Biden is simply improving the negotiating position of the Ukrainains going into those talks as they can now dish out as much damage to Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been visiting on Kyiv. Biden has 2 months to ship over all the kit designated for Ukraine in the October Presidential drawdowns. If Trump plans to cut off Ukraine from further US military aid anyways.Kyiv loses nothing ignoring a Trump demand to stop shooting whatever Biden supplied ATACMS they already have into Russia.
@pK-kw1zt Sounds like you didn't understand what I wrote but it's a different thing to cheer on war and send his troops and cheering on but not sending troops. Thats called being a coward. We want to send missiles into Russia but then we turn around and say that we are not involved. Take some responsibility for once..
Ukraine have had these missiles, along with other weapon systems to use in Ukraine and the eastern defences are crumbling. I dont think they are the game changer the media likes to think they are.
Lmao another magical game changer. Ukraine had use of numerous domestic missiles that could strike within Russia many more modern than the ATACMS sent to them. They try all the time and yet only a few get through.
No they didn't. Ukraine has been using drones and British and French cruise missiles to strike into Russia. Those systems have much shorter range and smaller warheads than the ATACMS. The fact that Ukraine is still able to slug it out with Russia after nearly 3 years in a war Russia expected to win in three days seems to show that western military aid has been a game changer. You may find that funny,but I doubt all the dead Russia soldiers killed by western weapons do.
The lies still flying high, North Korean troops!!! Where professor Michael Clarke and military analyst Sean Bell...... theyve given up on the lies now!!!😂😂😂
@ The truth is, No Ukrainian Soldiers have yet seen them, if you listened to serious Ukrainian military and political analysts, like; former adviser to the Ukrainian president, Alexei Arestovych, Director of Ukrainian Institute of Political Science and podcaster, Ruslan Bortnik…… Stop paying attention to narrative peddlers and widen your sources to include serious and honest analysts!!!! 😊
It's a representative democracy, which inherently means 99.999% of government decisions aren't voted for. The only recent one that was would be Brexit. That went well.......
Absolutely. It's our lives they are gambling with. A lot of people are under the illusion that America have the greatest of all warfare weapons and are the saviour of the world... along with their Nato friends! Russia is a country that has seen a LOT of casualties in their history, and have seen the West's tactics and dishonesty towards them , so I am sure over the passing years that they have been preparing for any future conflict. NOW after Biden's reckless (and nasty calculated) decision, we might ALL experience the reality. Ordinary members of the public do NOT deserve the consequences of their STUPID decisions , ESPECIALLY when Russia have repeatedly warned of the consequences. In contrast to America who did NOT give any warnings when they dropped their 'bombs' ALL those years ago .
Putin is very stupid. Only a stupid leader starts a 3 day operation and end up with a nuclear war. How stupid is that. Anyone who follow Putin will follow him to the grave.
Evidently these missiles are dependent on American satellites and milliltary personel to guide them!!!
Not good a idea.
What about the carbon footprint of the missiles 😂🤣
lol exactly.
They are solar powered made from soy beans. Completely recyclable.
What about the carbon footprint of Putin invading. Putin should go home.
I could say the same about the shit they talk 😂
We need to inform Greta Thunberg that climate is no longer changing because it involves attacking Russia
So javelins, challengers and himars weren't game changers but this is?
Nothing will change
The panicked trolls on here suggest otherwise
You think It won't escalate? Wow
From where they currently are, the Ukrainians can already cover the Kursk region with different missiles, rockets and drones. Since the use of ATACMs is restricted to the same region, I cannot see how much difference they will make. Ukraine hasn't a lot of them either, and its war head is relatively small. They certainly do not make a difference in the Donbas, where the Russians have been advancing for months. A lot of hype in the media.
Ukraine was given permission to hit targets threatening their forces in Kursk.That likely means Ukraine can drive ATACMS launchers into
the occupied Kursk region and launch them deep into Russia to hit targets beyond the reach of existing drones,rockets and other missile
systems.
What a silly analysis!
Nice knowing you all 👋
Why on earth are people still watching the BBC. There are so many other outlets where you can get sensible reports and analysis.
As much as Abrams, Bayraktar, F-16, Himars changed…
Less, not enough missiles to spare (allegedly by Pentagon).
It didn't change anything?? What about NKoreans?
The war Russia thought they would win in 3 days is going on 3 years. Yeah things have changed.
@@Virtus555there are no evidence that NKorean troops are participating at the battlefield
HIMARS changed quite a lot. Takes just a minute to learn how.
Peace!! All humanity is at risk.
Ask Biden and Netanyahu
The nonsense continues
Change? You mean escalate the war
you sound nervous, bot 😁
@@JiTiAr35And You sound like a war mongering idiot. Get off your keyboard and go to the front line then.
@JiTiAr35 😂 Too right
@@JiTiAr35 You should be nervous genius. If NATO started a war with Russia, it would lose. Current circumstances prove it.
@@Mordalo yes. if , right?
Putin bots always have too much imagination.
If that, if this
this conflict which has nothing to do with the countries supplying the weapons will escalate what could end up to be a possible WW3 , there will always be dispute between countries but there should be no outside interference unless it directly affects them and their citizens
you mean small weak countries should suffer silently at the hands of stronger bullies. F... your logic
So Russia should be free to ramage against its neighbors because they might go nuclear if the world says "Knock it off"?
Actually, there are not so much targets inside 300 km zone from front... We remembered that they were trying to hit plutong of infantry
The sheer amount of delusion is absurd
And still you are watching
👈🤡YES THE DELUSION IN THE PATHETIC BRAINWASHED RUSSIAN BOT IS HILARIOUS
@@sebastiaanl9876 what a pointless ridiculous statement. They didnt say they were unhappy watching this. They were commenting on the video CONTENT. Do keep up. Wow.
@@oddities-whatnotI never thought I would see so many Putin sympathizers 😂 he’s a dictator what’s so hard to understand
@@sebastiaanl9876yes, it's worth knowing how stupid government mouth pieces believe us to be.
WW3 now imminent should have been the title of this bizarre news article!
WW3 is not mminent, thats just properganda. How long has Putin been going on about nukes? Only Putin wants to nuke people.
Oh well there goes even more territory at best...worst is self explanatory.
Don't pay for propaganda!
Cancel your TV licence today
I canceled it a long time ago
Never paid it.
Suck on Rogan for your independent news
Well said
👈🤡I DONT PAY FOR ONE BUT I AINT LIKE YOU. YOU ARE JUST SCARED OF FACTS
Yeah well done, not really going to do much keep escalating this crap and pumping money into this war there needs to be diplomacy ffs
You and I all know it will definitely change nothing, it's not like they were used before to strike within disputed territories but did almost nothing to help on the battlefield.
Exactly. They have made little impact in the Crimea direction.
They have been using it to strike Donbass and Crimea and even a crowded beach and it didnt stop Russia from advancing on several fronts
Why now? Biden is old and going out. He will take the entire world with him. 😅
Why would Russia escalate to nuclear war when they only have to wait another 2 months for their meat puppet Trump to bail them out of their
own botched war of conquest? Biden is simply improving Ukraine's negotiating position by giving them the ability to do as much damage on the
Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been doing to Kyiv.
The question is what will Russia to back.
Buttering up this matter is ridiculous! This is fastening matters to WW3!
but russia is using north korea and iranian weapons in ukraine. What difference does this make? Russia has escalated ut already. The west should stop being puss
“Why do they (Brits and Francs) need US’s permission to use their missiles” 😅 the question caught the guest unprepared. He was probably thinking: what do you want me to say?
Европа- колония США. Правители Европы назначают в США.
Because Ukraine need American technology and. Satellites to guide them to their targets
The best thing the BBC can do is air Threads, the 1984 film they made to show the results of poor decisions.
They won't... it's not diverse enough!
Another red line? 😂
The first minute sounded like pure Propaganda, biased comments to lead you into their selected "experts " opinion.
Back when the bbc tried
You are right, and to read Annie Jacobsen's book: NUCLEAR.
There would be no 'winners'.
NO leader should EVER think about using NUCLEAR weapons as a last resort, but nearly all Nato countries have them. We are all run by evil people.
Sleepy Joe's leaving present
A handful of precision weapons with significant constraints and restrictions still imposed on their use wont have any significant strategic impact.
These weapons could be used in the direction of Crimea but they have made no difference to progress in that direction so I don't see they will change much in another direction.
Another NON-STARTER game charger wonder weapon. How are those F16's going?
Imo the F-16's are only there to provide defence to Ukrainian cities from Russian missiles. They were never intended to be used aggressively.
Warmongers at BBC loving it
Oh look , a peacenik.
@@Kohagaan A gopnik
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 a vatnik disguised as peacenik.
@@proselytizingorthodoxpente8304 more like a vatnik disguised as peacenik .
Watching all the way from Papua New Guinea, BBC World news my favourite
BBC is your favourite? Poor you 😂
Same thing was said for F-15 planes , and the Almighty leopards A1, bullocks
Its F-16s and Leopard 2 that were seen as war winners. They still could be since Russia is likely not going to achive its primary strategic goal of
over running Ukraine and replacing the Zelinsky government by force of arms.
They didn’t get f-15 planes and are still integrating the f-16’s into their air defense systems (and they’re already successful with 11 cruise missiles shot down in the last big attack).
F-16 planes. You are so uneducated that you can't even get that right. Besides the west only supplied the minimal amount of tanks, at a slow pace....did you expect one sword in an army to win the tide?
@@MightyRudewow - cause zelenky said so? What else would you like to parrot?
@@ronin7531
Shooting down 11 cruise missiles in one attack with just a couple of planes working with an integrated air defense system that includes ancient stuff like BUK and HAWK AA is quite impressive.
And when did Zelenskyy say that f15’s or anything else would be a silver bullet?
He only said that it will help to defend against russian attacks and that it would save Ukrainian lives (and it did both).
But go on and try to justify the average of 1500 russian losses per day for the last two months, it’s just day 1001 in russia’s three day special military operation.
Is firing British missiles into Russia a threat to British national security? Because British millitary personnel have to programme these missiles before some Ukrainian finger pushes the button
In a nutshell, yes.
Zelensky gonna push it himself
Yes, this obvious fact is deliberately omitted in BBC and other mainstream media reports.
Targets are identified, acquired and targeted by US military using their satellites. It is credibly reported that US troops are in Ukraine overseeing the set-up of the missiles.
Meanwhile our borders are wide open. With tens of thousands of fighting age men coming in.
The UK Govt put a post stating they would allow using storm-shadow missiles in Russia but then they removed the post. Looks like they changed their mind hahahaha!!
Ukraine is losing ground because of this kind of propaganda we have always been fed since 24 February 2022
Putin lover
Better to lose ground over 3 years vs losing a war in 3 days.
Europeans are happy at what Ukraine will do but nobody is talking about how Russia will respond. That scares me
Putler is gay 🌈 sparkly ✨ fairy 🧚
You have brain. They just want to hear that Russia is humiliated regardless of what Ukraine will hit with the so called long range missile.
The good thing is that, the consequence of the this move will bring the war to and end. Putin has been acting saintly, but will hit hard if Ukraine hit sensitive sites in Russia. His retaliatory actions in Ukraine will force the world to negotiate for peace.
I think they closed the gas pipe going through .. to South of Europe. Perhaps they might even restrick laudenring of oil and other minerals through India.
They will throw another 700,000 casualties at the problem.
Russia responded by adding North Korea if they do anything we're showing that North Korean troops are a red line
It will change the News Media reports, to more fake News 😂😂😂
I happened to stumble upon this video.
cause Helicopter Support flies: "God knows where...as usual... WTF!? is Sudzha!?"
Who cares?!
BBC is so excited at the possibility of a major conflict escalation.
Why? That's the question.
Thats because they want it
Giddy
Russia escalated by invading Ukraine and by welcoming North Korean troops.
That's because they are imbeciles
Oh look, another game-changer. Just like all those other game-changes that changed nothing.
"I must break you"
"If he dies, he dies"
"You will lose"
"To the end"
"He is not human, he is a piece of iron"
"I win for me! FOR ME!"
"I defeat all man. Soon I defeat real champion"
"I can not be defeated. I beat all man. Someday, I will beat a real champion. If he dies, he dies"
🇦🇺
?
People are excited about the use of long range weapons, but did they ever thought of the possible consequences from Russia?
Are you all nuts?!?!? Do you want a nuclear WWIII?
BBC Does
Do you want putin to keep occupi neighbours countries???
Stop defending putins killings
yes, we aint scared of a shit putin started the war and he can as well stop by withdrawing from ukraine..simple
yes yes, we do, the question is does Russia want WWIII, no one is on Russia's side but NK. India, China, and most of South Asians are not.
@@nextspecs😂how dare u to define Justice
The journalist and so called military expert are deluded fools it’s not a computer game
Madness prevails
Tentu saja itu akan merubah permainan, yaitu, Rusia menganggap anda sedang berperang melawan mereka, dan kita akan segera melihat wajib militer menimpa para pemuda eropa. Ekonomi hancur dan rakyat menderita di garis depan. Sementara kami melihat kalian di tv. Sunguh menyedihkan
I'd guess strategic targets, ammunition depots, troop concentrations, railway links. That kind of thing will be a target. It's not a 'wonder' weapon. However, the cumulative effect slows resupply. It means staging weapons platforms further back.
Remember what a role of BBC did during the invasion of Iraq
They're well known Lying Barstewarts.
they BBC is going in deep
This is exactly the reason why Russia kept asking NATO for 30 years not to move their frontier (and therefore missile dome) closer to Russia from the post Cold War lines, which is why NATO forced Russia to eventually push back.
We’re not the good guys here. If we’d just left Eastern Europe alone, this war wouldn’t be happening.
not true
Russian bot propaganda. An alliance expanding doesn’t give you the right to invade a country, never mind one outside of that alliance.
@ it is objectively and observably true now that the missiles Yeltsin didn’t want pointing into his front garden will soon be arriving.
Stop drinking the kool aid mate - we caused this war because the globalist bankers can’t control Russia.
Wake up.
@ It does if that alliances only purpose is to oppose you.
Corporate Globalist banking cabal bot.
You go and fight on the front lines of the war you crave then.
Send your kids (if you have any, which I doubt)
@cristiangaban960 100% true, but you are either wildly misinformed or part of the misinformation brigade, and I'm 100% British not a Putin apologist. Only psychopsths can support what the US neocons have fomented in Ukraine. Now get off to school, you're late.
It will let our earth become nuclear winter
Biden leaving a mess before being booted out. Genius.
US doesn't have hypersonic missiles (they stopped this development since it's too expensive and they don't believe they need it).
Russia, China, North Korea all have good hypersonic rockets with competitive prices (if you are interested): like Iran, Saudi, Brasil or even Mexico...
I agree with you. The US has a large air fleet and aircraft carriers. Let's imagine that Washington hits Moscow with missiles. Moscow can respond to Washington. But Moscow can escalate at other levels as well. For example, help US enemies attack numerous NATO bases in the EU. What will the US do? Send aircraft carriers to help across the ocean. The presence of hypersonic weapons in Russia will show that US aircraft carriers in a modern conflict are large, unwieldy troughs with a large crew.
Yeah you forgot to mention PapuaNewGuinea ,they also have a powerful nuclear arsenal .
What are you smoking? The US is hard at work on hypersonic weapons to match the Chinese who are seen as America's true geostrategic
rival,not Russia. Several tests have been conducted at US Pacific ranges using B-52s as launching platforms. When you cite Russia,China,
and North Korea, perhaps you mean, land based moblie systems vs aircraft or ship launched ones,but even in that case the US Army is in
development of mobile systems that could be deployed in the Philippines to put Chinese targets in the South China Sea at risk.
The US doesn't have deployed hypersonic missile systems,not because we don't believe we need it,but because their development was forbidden
by the Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile Treaty with the USSR/Russia.China never signed any such treaty and has been free to develop Hypersonic missiles for years. When the US saw that Russia was carrying out its own development program in violation of treaty,the US walked
away as well. It just a question of how long until the US catches up.
@@Oleg_lvanov
And yet China is embarked on a aircraft carrier building boom alongside the US,the British and the Japanese. Even France has a new aircraft
carrier in the planning stages. All those nations are maritime nations who depend on global trade vs being a gas station with nukes as Russia
is.
@@TheLAGopher Lots of text - little sense. When I talk about hypersonics, I mean their speeds and the ability to maneuver at such speeds. The Russian Federation has hypersonics in service. The US is still at the testing stage, i.e. they are a generation behind in the production of such weapons.
Countries are divided into maritime powers (USA, UK) and continental powers (Russia, Iran). When you talk about Russia as a gas station, you have poison dripping from your fangs.
Strange that he doesn't mention that US troops will control , programme and target the systems and become legitimate Russian targets
Nonsense.The launchers are manned by Ukrainains.The targeting data comes from the US forces in NATO countries.
They think we don’t know
I've never actually this new BBC Opening but the war is likely to get a lot worse if Russia responds... with escalation.
Russia can't respond.
God help us.
I think he's given up!
WWIII, here it begins
Laugh!
Remember with game changing weapons?
1. Leopard
2. Challengeer
3. ATACM
4. Storm Shadow
5. F-16
6. Abrams
None of them work
Russian bots need to make up their minds. Either western weapons don't matter,or Russia might go nuclear if we let Ukraine use them.Which is it?
So how come Putin's 3 day special military operation has lasted a thousand days?
So BBC is telling us that putin will withdraw his army from ukraine because of some missiles?😂, I wonder what theyll tell us after Russia responds with more missiles at ukraine and more territory
BBC is pro-establishment and pro-Ukraine, just like all other mainstream media in the West.
They can try
Russia is already responding with more missiles at Ukraine for 3 years. We are being told that the more damage Ukraine can inflct into Russia
the better negotiating position they are in to get Russians to withdraw from Ukraine in exchange to get back Kursk. Any negotiations would have to
be from a basis of Russia giving up something to get something and not just rely on a Trump imposed peace deal where current front lines are frozen.
Russia doesn't want parts of Kursk incorporated into Ukraine if the frontlines were frozen,so to get their land back,they had better trade back
Ukrainian land in return.
👈🤡NO THATS NOT WHAT THEY ARE SAYING YOU PATHETIC BRAINWASHED RUSSIAN BOT
The biggest concern is the escalation of No. Korea being involved. They wouldn't be there if Russia had half the capabilities that these drama queen reporters say they do. They need a solution NOW.
Yhis is just so much propaganda ....
AND STAMER IS LOOKING AT A GREEN COUNTRY COME ON IF WW3 STARTS IT WON'T MATTER
All newer weapons supplied or authorised for use by Ukraine have always been described as "game changers." This is not new either. The rhetorics and analyses are becoming boring. Just admit NATO has failed to beat Russia.
Self delusional people.
Empty sound bubbles
The use of nukes total insanity
Won't happen
👈🤡NOONE IS USING NUKES YOU 🤡.
😂😂
Putin knows he will have many pointed back at him he does not want Russia bombed i remember the last time they threatened us when Ragan was in power it was a real threat but this time I think not
@@colinparks619 at least not now. They'll threaten it but they know it's not deep enough conflict to do that
These people are pyscopaths
👈🤡YES THE UNELECTED 🤡 PUTIN WHO STARTED THIS WAR IS A PSYCHOPATH.
PUTIN COULD STOP THIS WAR IN AN HOUR ALL HE HAS TO DO IS PULL OUT OF UKRAINE AND STOP HIS LAND GRABS.
tell me you're a troll without saying you're a troll
You're right
Few individuals benefit from Ukraine war and contractor are on higher alert to rebuilt Ukraine
I'm favoured, $60k every week! I can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America.
Wow that's huge, how do you make that much monthly?
I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
As a beginner, it's essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. I'm guided by a widely known crypto consultant
She is Expert Lucille Friedman
Venturing into crypto as a newbie was very difficult due to lack of experience which resulted in loosing funds......... But Lucille Friedman, restored hope shes a good woman
Spot-on, I would always rate her signals as one of the best ever used 100% accurate.
I feel for the ppl of Ukraine, I really do. But how Zelensky just expects to be bailed out by the other nations is starting to grate on me.
Because Zelinsky knows that defeating Russia in Ukraine and reducing Russian military capabilities is a western military interest.
You have a LOT of patience! Zelensky 'begging' for weapons and money to fight his near neighbour, has been grating on my nerves since the beginning!
Because this is America's proxy war with Russia, Z. has been fawned over and indulged. He isn't even the legitimate President of Ukraine, since 20th? May this year. He is already a very wealthy man, but morally bankrupt.
And I think he will NEVER know a moment 's peace for the rest of his life.
Well, Russia has been bailed out by the west several times too.
Absolutely disgusting
Idea
Don't waste our money in Ukraine.
Let's see.
What happened to other game changers like the once hyped F-16's,Abram or Challenger tanks and so funny Russia has been destroying and jamming the very same depleted useless Atacms and Storm Shadows and they have failed dismaly to bring down the Crimean bridge due to highly advanced Russian air defence systems like the S-400 for example.
Do this and Russia have every right to direct missiles on UK and US targets…in their own countries…..how stupid are you all ?
Very stupid if you ask me, i have lost faith in our public, thryey are completely on a different planet.
bring it on, you think that such an action won't bring about the full force of NATO against russia? We're giving ukraine our old weapons mostly, russia hasn't seen the advanced stuff in action....when the f22, euro fighter, f35, b2 stealth and so many others turn their attention to russia, you'll find out just what can happen if you start a war with most of the richest nations in the world.
@@SilentWalker-if4nc they might not be on this one much longer
Russia is only being targeted in its own country because it is directing missiles against Ukrainian targets in Ukraine. Its the Ukrainians
directing missiles into Russia in self defense.Not the US or UK.
Hahahaha!
Grown ass dudes giggling at growing probability of nuclear war, right - enough UA-cam for today
Grown ass dudes looking for North Koreans in the field but can’t find any because they don’t deem russia worthy of defending, even they have toilets at home.
They won't use nukes
Fr . War equals money for the elites we die like pawns for there gain
@strongmandave5662 thoughts and prayers
@@KMSniper300 not in a nuke war
WWII, here it begins.
WWII finished ages ago weirdo
we already had WWII
@@Johnny_Caruthersheard this almost 100 times, look the stock and cryptocurrency when they make people scare they made more money 😂
The Russians are not going to do anything when they can wait for their buddy Donald Trump to get into office in 2 months with his
"Peace" deal. Biden is simply improving the negotiating position of the Ukrainains going into those talks as they can now dish out
as much damage to Russian infrastructure as Moscow has been visiting on Kyiv.
Biden has 2 months to ship over all the kit designated for Ukraine in the October Presidential drawdowns. If Trump plans to cut off Ukraine
from further US military aid anyways.Kyiv loses nothing ignoring a Trump demand to stop shooting whatever Biden supplied ATACMS
they already have into Russia.
War on Christmas wow
Eh?
"Putin withdraws his army from Ukraine and begs for mercy. Russia starts paying reparations". Then Zelensky wakes up.
You should worry about how long range Russian missiles have instead of cheering on a war that you are a coward to participate in
Russia is the antagonist here. You're siding with a dictatorship and a war criminal.
Ukraine is not even part of NATO
But can shoot missiles in Ukraine because he’s not cheering on war right? Listen to yourself 😂
@pK-kw1zt Sounds like you didn't understand what I wrote but it's a different thing to cheer on war and send his troops and cheering on but not sending troops. Thats called being a coward. We want to send missiles into Russia but then we turn around and say that we are not involved. Take some responsibility for once..
How many times does your um reporter um have to er um say um?
Doubling down on stupid.
Imagine disliking an incoming president so much, you'd risk starting WW3.
Nonsense
@shoja2009 Is it! Funny how they refused to let the Ukrainians fire them into Russia before the election for fear of escalation, but now it's ok?
Its not as if that incoming President didn't hate the sitting President so much he wasn't ready to risk Civil War sending a mob to storm Congress.
Another orange clown cult follower. Grow up
Where's the evidence for Korean troops where?
Means Russia has nothing to fight back
This foolishness now makes satellites a target!
When is this BS irrelevant but now dangerous propaganda going to be defunded?
You guys even think NAZYKRAINE can hit Russia with these missiles? The first launch they make it's a nuclear in Kiev.
Slava Ukraini ❤
Ukraine have had these missiles, along with other weapon systems to use in Ukraine and the eastern defences are crumbling. I dont think they are the game changer the media likes to think they are.
FANTASIES!
bbc warmongers
A very bad idea 🌎😳
Bro needs a remote to shift slides
None of European countries are able to strike inside of Russia not even USA 😂
Maybe too late
Lmao another magical game changer. Ukraine had use of numerous domestic missiles that could strike within Russia many more modern than the ATACMS sent to them. They try all the time and yet only a few get through.
Adjust tinfoil hat 😂
Remind me how many men Russia loses each day of the conflict.
No they didn't. Ukraine has been using drones and British and French cruise missiles to strike into Russia. Those systems have much shorter range and smaller warheads than the ATACMS. The fact that Ukraine is still able to slug it out with Russia after nearly 3 years in a war Russia expected to win in three days seems to show that western military aid has been a game changer. You may find that funny,but I doubt all the dead Russia soldiers
killed by western weapons do.
@@MrPurge11 russian forces alone around ~70 a day but your cope is amusing
Tin foil hat ? So the Hrim-2, R-360 Neptune and OTR-21B don't exist in your reality ? Not to mention the Jerry rigged S-75s and S-300s
The lies still flying high, North Korean troops!!!
Where professor Michael Clarke and military analyst Sean Bell...... theyve given up on the lies now!!!😂😂😂
Well North Korean troops are there arent they?
@ The truth is, No Ukrainian Soldiers have yet seen them, if you listened to serious Ukrainian military and political analysts, like; former adviser to the Ukrainian president, Alexei Arestovych, Director of Ukrainian Institute of Political Science and podcaster, Ruslan Bortnik……
Stop paying attention to narrative peddlers and widen your sources to include serious and honest analysts!!!! 😊
Don’t poke the bear Ukraine
Bald eagles don't like being plucked
@@newphaze-gz2kfMaybe they should just stay bald than
Russia is a bear facade, but really a house of cards.
What? Another nuclear threat? YAWN
@@Edelweiss-f8c Very dangerous attitude.
Not in my name. I was never asked about this, nore was the British public.
It's a representative democracy, which inherently means 99.999% of government decisions aren't voted for.
The only recent one that was would be Brexit.
That went well.......
Ukraine did not want this either so they have a right to strike back
Absolutely. It's our lives they are gambling with.
A lot of people are under the illusion that America have the greatest of all warfare weapons and are the saviour of the world... along with their Nato friends!
Russia is a country that has seen a LOT of casualties in their history, and have seen the West's tactics and dishonesty towards them , so I am sure over the passing years that they have been preparing for any future conflict.
NOW after Biden's reckless (and nasty calculated) decision, we might ALL experience the reality.
Ordinary members of the public do NOT deserve the consequences of their STUPID decisions , ESPECIALLY when Russia have repeatedly warned of the consequences.
In contrast to America who did NOT give any warnings when they dropped their 'bombs' ALL those years ago .
SHUT DOWN THE BBC.
Putin is very solid
Putin is very stupid. Only a stupid leader starts a 3 day operation and end up with a nuclear war. How stupid is that. Anyone who follow Putin will follow him to the grave.
Why everybody pay tv licence? Armagedon coming, stop support propaganda