He was actually too exhausted. He literally embarrassed himself the next match against Djokovic. Couldn't move even in the slightest, he was so cramped up and retired quickly. Literally handed Djokovic a spot in the final. It was absurd. Carreno Busta would've been fine for that match. Nishikori is always hurt or not fit. Always.
E2G Well even if he wasn’t completely exhausted he still would’ve showed respect for his opponent and not boast because that’s the type of character he has.
It’s a cultures things.... they’re not perfect but Asian peoples mostly respect themselves first. Reasons why they control their behavior not to offend anyone. Family oriented peoples and respectful.....
When Nishikori played against Karlovic in the tiebreak of the fifth set, there was a challenge that did not repeat the point either, what did Nishikori do? won 4 points in a row, and then won the match, Nishikori won this game because he is calmer and smarter than this weeping
He lost the match against himself the moment he allowed his emotions to kill his 8-6 lead. This is why Borg was my idol as a young tennis player. Match point, up or down, Borg always played one shot at a time in the present moment. He undid a lot of players with this psychology and their was certainly no Hawkeye in his day!
You could tell Kei was under a lot of pressure but handled it so well... Michael Chang looked more touched than anyone else with that win...lol... What passion :)
Yes Nishikori was going to win the point regardless. However, the umpire made the mistake of accepting the challenge so the point should have been replayed considering it was called incorrectly
dxrida If a player hits a serve for an ace and it’s called out but it was actually in then the call stands right? I personally don’t see how this is different as the point was over before the call was made. It’s the same logic I think.
I know I'm going to face backlash from this, but I agree with the umpire, 9:30 the Nishikori pretty much hit the ball the same time as the out call, and carrerno busta was running the opposite way, theoretically there is no way C.B. would have won that point unless he could magically stop and then teleport to the ball
That is not the point! The ball was called out, and neither the line or the umpire corrected the call! In order to not loose the point by ball out pablo did challenged his ball. The ball was in so Pablo won the callenge. The hit of Nishikori is not part of the game becuase the point was finished after the line called the ball out and none corrected him!
@Jota Peli Should have been a let. However CB costed himself the match because he could have focus on winning the next two points to close the match but instead he completely lost it over one point. He was still in the lead. Honestly I agree with the call because it was called when Kei hit the ball and Pablo ran opposite.
@@11kboy it is hard for PCB to keep focus at that point, because he probably felt mocked by the umpire who first accepted his challenge, then he told him that the outcome of the challenge didn't matter. The referee shouldn't have accepted Pablo's challenge, then the Spaniard would have probably kept his composure to win the match.
@@davideleone9809 You're spot on. The umpire shouldn't have accepted the challenge if he was going to give Nishikori the point. It was a very tough call though because they called while Kei was hitting it down the line and Pablo guessing it wrong(obviously). Regardless, bad calls happens in tennis. Its not like he was down 8-9 or 5-8, He was up 8-6! No excuse.
sailorvvv you and the umpire stupid both .why the umpire accepted the challenge if he wouldn’t replay the point ? That why carreno angry and he is completely right
He didnt call before Kei hits the ball. Pause the video at 9:30-9:31 he hits the ball and right after you hear the call. Ref made the right call according to the rules his only mistake was to give Busta the challenge.
I´m sorry but you are wrong. The ball was call out, and neither the lineman or the umpire corrected it. The hit back of Nishikori is pointless because the point had ended after the call. Pablo then challenged the ball to not lose the point by ball out, and he won the callenge for what it´s needed to repeat the point. What was wrong was the call of the lineman and the umpire not following the rules after a challenge.
@@resgr If the call is corrected from “Out” to “Good”, then a Let must be played UNLESS the Chair Umpire in his/her sole judgment determines that it was a clear ace or a clear winning shot that the player could not possibly have retrieved. If there is any reasonable possibility that such a ball could have been played, then the player must be given the benefit of the doubt.
It's completely irrelevant whether the call came before or after Nishikori hit the ball. the only thing that matters is whether the umpire overruled the linesman call (he didn't) and whether he accepted the challenge. After not overrulling and accepting PBC to challenge it should be completely out of his hands.
I am still wondering why this Umpire accepted and announced the challenge of Carreno Busta while he has already decided to give the point to Nishikori no matter if the Ball was in or out. Nishikori for me is not fault in this case, he played 100% fair. The umpire schould not accept the Challenge as the point is an obvious winner for Nishikori. But as he accepted and announced the challenge then the point must be replayed if the ball is in. Otherwise it makes no sense to accept and announce the challenge :S
The umpire just want that Nishikori won that point, not sense at all. Then Carreno miss an easy return and lost his focus. Nishiori smell blood and fly in that court.
Hay dos tipo de errores: los técnicos y los conceptuales. El juez de línea tuvo un error técnico, el de silla uno conceptual. Es sobre el error conceptual que recae la demanda de Busta. El error arbitral fue haberle permitido a Busta el challenge porque, en efecto, Nishikori golpeó la pelota antes de que el juez de línea la diera por mala. Esto lo podemos ver a 0.25 de velocidad (9:27). Por tanto, la acción del juez de línea no afecta la ejecución del tenista. El punto es, en teoría, para Nishikori. Sin embargo, el juez de silla permite el challenge a Busta. Al habilitar el challenge el juez asume que Nishikori golpeó la pelota después del grito de OUT, de modo que, a nivel de la práctica, lo correcto o coherente hubiera sido repetir el punto a efectos de que la bola fue corroborada como buena por el ojo de halcón. El juez de silla, en pocas palabras, aprovechó la nebulosa reglamentaria para emparchar su error. El challenge mide los errores técnicos, no los conceptuales.
Kei started swinging much before the call and the umpire judged Kei hit the ball earlier than the call. Nothing but only the umpire can judge which was first at the site. No matter what the ball was in or out, Kei's action was done and Busta also already moved toward the other side of the court before the call. Even though the challenge was right, Busta cannot reverse everything happened at the moment. That is the reason why the umpire judged that is Kei's point.
I agree. But he should not have accepted the challenge on the first place. Carreno Busta was like.. why the f** did you accept my challenge if you are not going to change anything anyways? Lol
@@nicolasrivero3027 Hi. Busta was not unlucky. Cuz everybody except the line-umpire judged the ball was "in". If it were replayed, many fans would think Busta is smart but used the rule in a dirty way. It is not honorable for Busta. And I am not sure when a player requests a challenge, the umpire has the authority to reject it.
This video has delayed sound. If you go to when the ball hit the net cord, the sound comes after the ball hit it. Watch the Japanese version instead. ua-cam.com/video/UskJ-sjt4qs/v-deo.html&t=15
It was Kei's point regardless whether it was in or out. Besides, Carreno was running to the opposite direction. Carreno wanted to take advantage of the rule after the fact the point was over just to see how things would go. But, the umpire made the correct decision and gave the point to Kei which he deserves. Kei had to hit the ball almost at the same time when the linesman was calling out which was already a distraction but he made it in while Carreno was running to the other direction. It would have been much more unfair for Kei if the point had to be replayed in this situation. The linesman made 2 mistakes. First one being that it was in fact in and he called it out. Second being that it was a late call. All the blames need to go to the linesman not to the umpire if one wants to blame someone for the situation. I think the umpire's mistake might have been to accept the challenge after the point was over at least to his mind which is irrelevant as to who actually won the point.
The umpire is obligated to accept the challenge from a player if the player calls immediately after a call is made by a linesman. Provided the player has 'challenges' left of course. It is not the umpires right to change 'the rules' in that situation.
@@wihanvandermerwe Nishikori was already hitting the ball as normal before the call was made. Carreno Busta was running in the opposite direction. It was a winner regardless of the (late) call made.
@@stevehughes1510 Considering it was such a late call, the umpire could have overruled the linesman's call immediately after it was made so that the ball is in, without accepting the player's challenge. Nishikori would not have challenged because he had already hit the ball and won the point. Though whether the player challenges or not does not affect the outcome as some people seem to believe.
@@unowen7591unfortunately not, we do 1 hour on and off, and I was off during the last tiebreaker, but you can see me in the other videos of the full match
@@scottysatpanalysis I've done it for 3 years so is alot of matches, but the biggest players I've met are thiem, zverev, nadal, nishikori, shapovalov, Dimitri, monfils, tsitsipas...
I almost always root for Nishikori. One of my favorite players on tour. Bad break for Carreno Busta, but this was awesome. And the bag slam was epic LOL
There are many times in life when anger is not only justified, but demanded. When anger results in a loss of self-control, then that is the weakness...not the anger in itself.
I feel his frustration but it should be more because of himself than the call. He was still up 2 points and on serve. He had opportunities to calm himself and serve it out but he didn't. Give credit to Kei for always staying calm even under tremendous amount of pressure.
No matter what the call is, the fact is Nishikori won the point either way. The umpire made the right decision that there’s no need to replay the point. If it’s out Nishikori won the point; if it’s in he won the point, too. Busta really lost the point and the match at that point because he lost his mental cool. If he accepted the call, the story might be different. Let’s enjoy the game and learn something from it.
You're wrong! if the line judge called wrongly out, and the umpire accepts the challenge, if the ball is in, they MUST replay the point. It doesn't matter that Busta was out of game or Nishikori hit the ball in, these are the rules...the umpire was wrong in this case, cause the challenge was accepted and the ball was in, they have must be replayed the point, even if this wouldn't have been fair to Nishikori, the mess has been done by the line judge, but these wrong calls happens and are part of tennis. These are the rules
@@dottorcarlone Logically it has to be Nishikori's point. If the rules say oppostite, they are bad rules and needs to be changed. I'm going with the umpire here.
he was no where near the ball... lol it would be bad to take that point away from Nishikori. calling out would not affect Busta as he was running the other way.
Doesn't make a difference. Regardless of this, the umpire still allowed PCB to challenge and the call was overruled. When a ball is overruled the point must be replayed
@@MegaJimyjames Wrong, read the rule. Pablo would never return the ball, he was far away to the side. According to the rule, the point must go to Nishikori.
15:42 I forget that coach's name (the one beside Michael Chang) but I think Nishikori needs to keep him by his side no matter what! That guy is so loyal, and always viciously rooting for Kei. He is always up there providing positive yet also very tough and fighting energy in the big moments.
His face had nothing to do with rules of the game. The umpire made the right call. See Rule 36 in this link: www.usta.com/content/dam/usta/pdfs/2015_Code.pdf
It’s simple, the only thing the out call Influenced was Kei’s follow through, in which he managed to handle. It’s an out or a winner, Kei’s point either way.
I don't agree with the description. Kei won the game by keeping it cool, amazing how he did it. I have not seen any other Kei's match, but that guy has a character, he kept it cool and did amazing. Both the players are amazing, but Carreno drama showed he is bit inferior.
No- I disagree with the situation at 9:20. Nishikori played it fair and square. Even if the ball was in play, Busta would have never been able to return it.
Nishikori may not have the best possible technique, but his mental resilience is amazing. Pity that Carreno Busta could not convert the win due to nerves and emotions, but Kei certainly deserved it more.
Disculpa, más allá de los nervios, Carreño Busta fue perjudicado por el umpire, pésimo arbitro; el ojo de halcon se puso en tenis, por culpa del pésimo arbitraje de Mariana Alves, que perjudico a Serena Williams en el US OPEN 2004, y por los errores tan evidentes de esa jueza Portuguesa; y en este partido carreño Busta fue perjudicado por el mal arbitraje y canto malo del juez de línea.
Nishikori switches strategy in the final set 6-8 scene. Observe the mental of Carreno Busta and switch defensively. It is the same as Nishikori, but I wanted to finish the game soon, but it was a clever scene of Nishiki with a self-explosion over time.
Although I respect all the comments about what the rules are and how the call was questionable and may have changed the outcome of the match, let's just say that this match really reflects how tennis is a mental game. Kei showed that he was calm and continued to play great tennis. Carreno however, lost his cool and threw the match away. And yes I know that the call may have upset him as I have been in that situation myself, however tennis is not a game for the weak minded. You must be mentally strong and fight for every point regardless of what has just happened. I'm not saying that this will make you win every match but it certainly gives you the upper hand. This was a great match and both players played very well
Wow, what a strong mental game by Nishikori. This is what happens when you flip out coz of a single call without re-focusing and adjusting accordingly. Even if the point (net ball) carried on - Busta was more than halfway across the court - he was never going to return the eventual down the line shot. He should have let it go.
"The Chair Umpire must decide if the original “out” call was a hindrance to either player. If it was a hindrance, the point shall be replayed. If it was not a hindrance, the player who hit the ball wins the point." www.atptour.com/en/corporate/rulebook Nishikori was mid-swing and Pablo was definitely sprinting to the other side BEFORE the call. There was no hindrance to either player, hence the umpire awarded the point to the player that hit the ball.
That's good and all, but if that's the case, then the umpire should not accept the challenge in the first place. If the umpire accepts the challenge and the ball is in, then a let should be played.
For me it was the right decision of the umpire. The out call was really late and there was no way for carreno Busta to reach the ball (either there wasn't a out call)
I think he wanted the point to be replayed saying that the call came before nishikori hit the ball. But that wouldn't have been very fair at all to nishikori. He should have accepted it. Well, good that he lost then.
A stone cold finish for Nishikori, outstanding composure. Carreno Busta had lost his cool, resulting in the loss of his lead. I disagree with the caption, he was not robbed.
The issue wasnt ‘In or Out’ but the position of Busta when Nishikori hit the ball. Let’s say Nishikori hit the ball and Busta was able to return the ball, the point would be repeated after the challenge.
Busta's position is irrelevant. Even Nishikori's last shot it's irrelevant if it goes in or out. There has been a call. The point ends as soon as the call is made.
Umpire should not give the point to kei. In my opinion it would have been better that the umpire decide to replay the point than give to kei. It was a crucial game and a mistake by the umpire. Anyway, congrats to kei
what do you mean giving pcb the challenge. He does not have a choice, if a player challenges then the ball must be challenged. In this case,not replaying the point was a fatal error by the chair and it is outrageous to see this at this level.
@@lobogo777 : The umpire is totally right. In the replay it's clear that PCB went to the right at the same time Nishikori hit to the left corner and at the same time the linesman called the ball out.
What was the point of giving a challenge when you would just ignore the outcome anyway? There were cases when players, moving in opposite direction, could still retrieve the ball. What looks like a clear winner won't apply to Nadal in some cases.
Credit to both these fine players. I’ve lost to the same person, in the same tournament two consecutive years, having match points in both matches. Loss is hard but credit to the opponent who plays just a bit better in close matches.
Kei obviously hit the unreturnable winner at the same time the call was made making the out call irrelevant unless it somehow affected Carreno's ability to return Kei's shot, which of course it didn't. So the ump's decision was correct and a replay would be an underserved windfall for Carreno. Great match by Correno which he let slip away with misplaced anger.
@@seanhillery1231 Only if the call occurred prior to the winner. Here the simultaneous call had no affect on the players. Its Kei who would therefore be robbed by a replay.
Busta is not a popular tennis player neither someone that kids would like to be like. Djokovic forms part of the Big 3 and has to set an example. It´s different. Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic´s position comes with great responsability. Until now, only Roger and Rafa have proven to be gentlemen inside and outside the court and a great example for future players. That is why Nole is criticized so much, you can´t compare any of the big 3 with standard players.
@@diogens474 ,Yes I am hitting my doors when nobody around. And I am very nice in the eyes of others. I don't like people to see my devil's side. But luckily it stays by hitting doors and f.ing this and that.So you don't know Roger or Rafa.
@@mir-jan3496 i don´t care how they are in private. They are gentleman in the court and it seems the same way outside. Stop making up excuses.They are an example for sportmanship. The best two players ever.
@@KS-fy6vq Actually the call came the exact same time Kei hits it. To be honest, there is no way the call affected Carreno given that he was already out of position to do anything to the ball when Kei hits it. Its arguable that the point should go to Carreno if the rule states point should be replayed if the call came the same time as the player hits it. But if so, then Kei would be robbed by the linesman. It'll be unfortunate for the other player either way.
The point was still in play while Nei hit the ball. Technically Busta lost the point. Right call by umpire. Very simple. Know the rules. That’s why he’s the ump.
I know rules are rules. But you know what? Fuck them. Rules don't always address absolutely every single scenario. It's impossible. Sport is unpredictable. I personally don't see how a replay should be called when it clearly disadvantages one player who practically won the point. Nishikori would have been possibly robbed, completely out of his own control. Umpire made a great decision even if it was the wrong one. Carreno Busta should be ashamed of himself for his hissy fit over a point he NEVER deserved.
correct. Busta was not robbed at all. He was continuing with the point and was on the other side of the court. Ump played advantage and there was no way he would have got to the ball played down the line. Good call ump.
10:27 I froze the image just when the linesman screams “out”, and Nishikori had just hit the ball, Bautista was running to his left and the ball was over the service square of the spaniard, so the voice of the linesman didn’t affect Bautista’s reaction.
Here it is simple : if the ball is out, Pablo loses the point, if it's in, whatever is called wouldn't change anything because he had already chosen the wrong way and got wrong footed, but his frustration is normal in such a key moment
Simple but false. If the umpire accepts the hawk-eye he must be consequent with it. If the ball is in, the point must be repeated. If the ball is out the point is for Nishikori. Those are the rules. The umpire should be sanctioned for such a crucial mistake. There is no place for "umpire's interpretation" in a hawk-eye.
The ball was in an there was a wrong call, but without any call, Pablo would have lost the point the same way because he made his choice BEFORE the call. Basically you replay the point when the call changes something in the point, this is logical
@@paullabbe6720 You are not understanding my point. It is irrelevant whether the call was made after Nishikori made the shot (which is debatable by the way). If the umpire ACCEPTS the hawk-eye then he should be consequent with it. There is no room for "umpire's interpretation" once he ACCEPTS the hawk-eye. If the ball is in, the point should be repeated. If the ball is out, the point is for Nishikori. Otherwise, why would he ACCEPT the hawk-eye? Following your logic, it is irrelevant whether the hawk-eye showed the ball in or out, the point would be anyway for Nishikori. To give the point to Nishikori by means of "interpretation", the umpire should not have accepted the hawk-eye. Once he accepted the hawk-eye, there is no room for interpretation, the rules are clear.
@@srkucrickk I think the umpire realised his mistake (accepting the challenge) too late to cancel it. So he decided to continue like there was no challenge, which was the most ''fair'' thing he could do. btw if PCB had some character he would not argue and continue playing, he must have known he would never reach the ball.
@@miroslavjanecek9993 He commited the mistake of accepting the hawk-eye, thus he should follow it. The rules are clear. Crucial mistake, the umpire should be sanctioned. With that being said, congratulations to Nishikori who maintained the concentration and played great the last points.
Repeating my comments as a reply to his comment but I thought I can also share here some insights in the main page. Interesting view points. I think the problem here though, is that while the call is made as Kei is playing the point (it is mighty close, and people can say slow it down and what not, but on the court it would have been at the exact same time anyway), Pablo is already running away from the point and had made no attempts to come back from the ball even before the call was made. Therefore, he had and would have lost the point regardless of whether Hawk-eye ruled that it was in or not since it would not have affected the outcome of the point regardless. I think that was how the umpire made the conclusion that the point goes to Kei. I do believe that the outcome of the call would be very different if Pablo’s momentum was towards the ball or made attempts to reach back for the ball. If he did that, then I think your argument holds true and point must be replayed. THAT BEING SAID, honestly I think this is more a problem of the ruling instead of the umpire. If I am not mistaken, the ruling dictates that the umpire must make a judgment as to whether the player had any chance of retrieving the ball had the call been made differently. If they amended the rule to say that in all circumstances, where calls are made incorrectly and challenged correctly, all points must be replayed regardless, we wouldn’t have so many arguments and debates. On the point around allowing Pablo to challenge the call regardless, I think the umpire had explained to Pablo that regardless of the outcome he will lose the point, but Pablo did not rescind his challenge at that point (of course he was in argument over other matters). Unfortunately I don’t think umpire has the authority to NOT allow the challenge to take place, no matter how ridiculous it is. That decision is entirely in the hands of the player.
@@drtslim Nah, it will present other forms of issues. Just look at VAR haha. As long as there is a human element to the decision making, there will always be judgment calls and issues. It's all part of sports lol
I'm not a tennis fan as such but I have to admire the self control and composure of Nishikori. What an example to up and coming young players. Surely so called professionals MUST reign in their anger in public. I know it's the heat of the moment but shouldn't this be addressed in training? I do let off steam myself when playing Badminton but given that I am in my 70s I've learned to do this hopefully in an amusing - not aggressive- way! Anyway, good match.
This one is really tough, 99% of the time it's pretty clear for me who's in the right or wrong! By the time Kei makes contact with the ball a fraction of a second later the line's man calls OUT. 1 thing is clear the OUT call did NOT hinder Carreno since he was running the other way! Both outcomes are possible here, the Umpire could've played LET or give the point to the opponent and he choose the latter! IF the ball was OUT he would've given the point to Kei anyway, so it should only be fair IF the ball is in that there should be a LET!
It's completely irrelevant whether the call came before or after Nishikori hit the ball. the only thing that matters is whether the umpire overruled the linesman call (he didn't) and whether he accepted the challenge. After not overrulling and accepting PBC to challenge it should be completely out of his hands.
@@msalvs The linesman called OUT so PBC has the right to challenge that call and he was right the ball was IN so there should've been a LET. The linemen's call was RELEVANT because that's what the Umpire based his decision upon, he said to PBC that the call came after Kei had made contact and that he couldn't have gotten to the ball because he was running the other way! IF this was an ace it would've been a much easier decision!
To Dear Dominic Leroy. P. HINDRANCE 1. Hindrance by Officials a. If the call is corrected from “Out” to “Good”, then a Let must be played ”unless the Chair Umpire in his/her sole judgment determines that it was a clear ace or a clear winning shot that the player could not possibly have retrieved”. If there is any reasonable possibility that such a ball could have been played, then the player must be given the benefit of the doubt. In this case, according to above a : "the Chair Umpire in his sole judgment determines that it was a very clear Nishikori's winning shot that the player PCB could not absolutely have retrieved”, so a Let mustn't be played. That's a rule, and so I think correct Justice.
Most times - if an incorrect call is made and the player has a play on the ball, the point is replayed. Nishikori was right there at the net, so he had a play on the ball when it was called; the call didn't affect his next shot. At that time of the match, it just stings that much more. It would have been nice if they replayed the point just to make it 100% fair. But PCB has to reset. He totally lost it after that, and lost the match as a result. But that's a bitter, bitter way to lose. Ouch.
He was right. It doesn't matter what was his position when Nishikori hit the last shot. It doesn't matter if Nishikori's shot went in or out. The linesman made a mistake. THE POINT IS OVER AS SOON AS THE LINESMAN CALLS OUT. That's what Busta is saying, he is not responsable for the linesman's mistake.
A replay is only legit and allowed if Carreno Busta had a play on Nishikori's shot. Carreno Busta had no play on the ball because he was running in the opposite direction. This is a case of hindrance and there is a rule for that and the umpire called it by the book.
Didn't expect this from a top seeded player like carreno, having so much vast experience in this game. Arguing for 1point when your are significantly leading. I hope he has learnt his lesson. Umpire's decision is final!!!
Carreno Busta should have just left it at that at the argument because he still had all the momentum and just slowing it down caused the momentum to shift in Nishikori’s favor. Im really happy that Nishikori won though.
The call was slightly after Kei's shoot. It was Nishikori's point either way. The only thing the judge did wrong is accepting the Carreno's challenge. It would be totaly wrong and unfair to replay the point. The rule is a rule but the judge is here to prevent to take an unfair advantage of the rule.
Nishikori did not celebrate in the end and looked out for his rival - great gesture, great guy.
That’s a samurai spirit
He was actually too exhausted. He literally embarrassed himself the next match against Djokovic. Couldn't move even in the slightest, he was so cramped up and retired quickly. Literally handed Djokovic a spot in the final. It was absurd. Carreno Busta would've been fine for that match. Nishikori is always hurt or not fit. Always.
E2G Well even if he wasn’t completely exhausted he still would’ve showed respect for his opponent and not boast because that’s the type of character he has.
Nishikori is not such a good guy as you are trying to present. This time he was correct, but I saw him many times behave incorrectly.
He is always a man and player with class and good manners
Nishikori just smashing that ace in and going back to his place, drinking some water just as he won a normal game. This guy is amazing.
haha True.
Ya that was cold as fuck
Japan is always like that... So boring
@@Saanders_ always?? what do you know about Japan dude.
@@Saanders_ Says someone who's never been to Japan. Lol
Nishikori’s mental toughness is too great when it comes to situations like that. He has proved it times and again on many occasions.
How many slams has he won?
He’s Asian…. Not 100 percent but mostly they’re behave with less ego. Must be Asian cultures
He is mentally strong when he feels he is better than his opponent. When its the other way he is mentally weak.
@@JK-vc7ie Zero. He made it to Us open finals though in I think 2014
なんとも言えない試合っすね
I was really touched to watch this game.
Kei took the victory with his never give up mind. ye, He is a real hero for me.
Hats off to Nishikori and his attitude!!! Most coolest Tennis player!!!!
Nishikori probably meditates like an hour a day. That level of cool is awe inspiring
Espescially when he needs to listen to that intoleable growning 🤢
It's just the way Japanese people are taught to behave both inside and outside of the court
It’s a cultures things.... they’re not perfect but Asian peoples mostly respect themselves first. Reasons why they control their behavior not to offend anyone. Family oriented peoples and respectful.....
That wasn't legal for Carreño
This called “Samurai soul”
When Nishikori played against Karlovic in the tiebreak of the fifth set, there was a challenge that did not repeat the point either, what did Nishikori do? won 4 points in a row, and then won the match, Nishikori won this game because he is calmer and smarter than this weeping
That’s precisely I wanted to say.
@@kerrywangnao7354 thanks a lot !😁
@@kerrywangnao7354 asian men don`t have emotions.
@Rich Panini And you have no brain if you really think so.
Nishikori and shohei ohtani has the same calmness. but not all Asian.
He lost the match against himself the moment he allowed his emotions to kill his 8-6 lead. This is why Borg was my idol as a young tennis player. Match point, up or down, Borg always played one shot at a time in the present moment. He undid a lot of players with this psychology and their was certainly no Hawkeye in his day!
Agree. He already lost the point irrespective of the call. I think the umpire made the right call here.
That’s how you play life. One shot at a time. No joke.
In the end Borg undid himself mentally too, which was kinda sad as we never saw what truly could have been.
@@supercritic100 absolutely. It’s like 6-7 years of repressed emotions on the court (and maybe off?) just became too much.
@@supercritic100 What do you mean?
If I was Kei’s coach I’d be crying like a baby lol that was amazing and the finish was something out of a movie.
He was crying...but in a totally japanese samurai way.
@@Adam-ui8iy Michael Chan is a Taiwanese-American for goodness sake.
@@user-yd4nk4lm6sit's Michael Chang for god's sake
@@seantube15wow one missed letter.
@@seantube15Autocorrected spelling lol
You could tell Kei was under a lot of pressure but handled it so well... Michael Chang looked more touched than anyone else with that win...lol... What passion :)
Play on 0.25x speed..line call was after ball contact. Regardless if in or not, Nishikori wins the point.
Yes Nishikori was going to win the point regardless. However, the umpire made the mistake of accepting the challenge so the point should have been replayed considering it was called incorrectly
dxrida If a player hits a serve for an ace and it’s called out but it was actually in then the call stands right? I personally don’t see how this is different as the point was over before the call was made. It’s the same logic I think.
Amen.
Actually, it was before
9:29
@@j-tallica1188 watch in .25x
I know I'm going to face backlash from this, but I agree with the umpire, 9:30 the Nishikori pretty much hit the ball the same time as the out call, and carrerno busta was running the opposite way, theoretically there is no way C.B. would have won that point unless he could magically stop and then teleport to the ball
That is not the point! The ball was called out, and neither the line or the umpire corrected the call! In order to not loose the point by ball out pablo did challenged his ball. The ball was in so Pablo won the callenge. The hit of Nishikori is not part of the game becuase the point was finished after the line called the ball out and none corrected him!
@Jota Peli Should have been a let. However CB costed himself the match because he could have focus on winning the next two points to close the match but instead he completely lost it over one point. He was still in the lead. Honestly I agree with the call because it was called when Kei hit the ball and Pablo ran opposite.
@@11kboy it is hard for PCB to keep focus at that point, because he probably felt mocked by the umpire who first accepted his challenge, then he told him that the outcome of the challenge didn't matter. The referee shouldn't have accepted Pablo's challenge, then the Spaniard would have probably kept his composure to win the match.
@@davideleone9809 You're spot on. The umpire shouldn't have accepted the challenge if he was going to give Nishikori the point. It was a very tough call though because they called while Kei was hitting it down the line and Pablo guessing it wrong(obviously). Regardless, bad calls happens in tennis. Its not like he was down 8-9 or 5-8, He was up 8-6! No excuse.
sailorvvv you and the umpire stupid both .why the umpire accepted the challenge if he wouldn’t replay the point ? That why carreno angry and he is completely right
He didnt call before Kei hits the ball. Pause the video at 9:30-9:31 he hits the ball and right after you hear the call. Ref made the right call according to the rules his only mistake was to give Busta the challenge.
I´m sorry but you are wrong. The ball was call out, and neither the lineman or the umpire corrected it. The hit back of Nishikori is pointless because the point had ended after the call. Pablo then challenged the ball to not lose the point by ball out, and he won the callenge for what it´s needed to repeat the point. What was wrong was the call of the lineman and the umpire not following the rules after a challenge.
@@resgr
If the call is corrected from “Out” to “Good”, then a Let must be played UNLESS the Chair Umpire in his/her sole judgment determines that it was a clear ace or a clear winning shot that the player could not possibly have
retrieved. If there is any reasonable possibility that such a ball could have been played, then the player must be given the benefit of the doubt.
@@mariostheophilou Yes, that is correct for Nishikori that was hitting the miscalled ball :)
Marios Theophilou h
It's completely irrelevant whether the call came before or after Nishikori hit the ball. the only thing that matters is whether the umpire overruled the linesman call (he didn't) and whether he accepted the challenge. After not overrulling and accepting PBC to challenge it should be completely out of his hands.
4:36 This is why I love japanese
チンチンで草
うねりアイランド いやなんで？？笑
こばやかわごんぱち 今は変わってますが、コメ主の名前が chin chin でした笑
うねりアイランド なるほどね笑
チンチン呼ばわりしたせいで名前変わってて草
I am still wondering why this Umpire accepted and announced the challenge of Carreno Busta
while he has already decided to give the point to Nishikori no matter if the Ball was in or out.
Nishikori for me is not fault in this case, he played 100% fair. The umpire schould not accept the Challenge as the point is an obvious winner for Nishikori. But as he accepted and announced the challenge then the point must be replayed if the ball is in.
Otherwise it makes no sense to accept and announce the challenge :S
Right; 'can't believe what I saw ?!? Nishikori isn't fair, here, 'should have demanding to repeat the point ! Quell' blamage !!
Good point!
Good explanation
The umpire just want that Nishikori won that point, not sense at all. Then Carreno miss an easy return and lost his focus. Nishiori smell blood and fly in that court.
Should of been Sacked for this
Hay dos tipo de errores: los técnicos y los conceptuales. El juez de línea tuvo un error técnico, el de silla uno conceptual. Es sobre el error conceptual que recae la demanda de Busta. El error arbitral fue haberle permitido a Busta el challenge porque, en efecto, Nishikori golpeó la pelota antes de que el juez de línea la diera por mala. Esto lo podemos ver a 0.25 de velocidad (9:27). Por tanto, la acción del juez de línea no afecta la ejecución del tenista. El punto es, en teoría, para Nishikori. Sin embargo, el juez de silla permite el challenge a Busta. Al habilitar el challenge el juez asume que Nishikori golpeó la pelota después del grito de OUT, de modo que, a nivel de la práctica, lo correcto o coherente hubiera sido repetir el punto a efectos de que la bola fue corroborada como buena por el ojo de halcón. El juez de silla, en pocas palabras, aprovechó la nebulosa reglamentaria para emparchar su error. El challenge mide los errores técnicos, no los conceptuales.
Porque van 8-5 en un tie break?
@@blasespada8664 último set
@@blasespada8664 En el ultimo set de un GS se juega un supertie-break al mejor de 10
The thumbnail is me after losing a match at my tennis club.
hahahahah ...Same!
Kei started swinging much before the call and the umpire judged Kei hit the ball earlier than the call. Nothing but only the umpire can judge which was first at the site.
No matter what the ball was in or out, Kei's action was done and Busta also already moved toward the other side of the court before the call. Even though the challenge was right, Busta cannot reverse everything happened at the moment. That is the reason why the umpire judged that is Kei's point.
I agree. But he should not have accepted the challenge on the first place. Carreno Busta was like.. why the f** did you accept my challenge if you are not going to change anything anyways? Lol
@@nicolasrivero3027 Hi. Busta was not unlucky. Cuz everybody except the line-umpire judged the ball was "in".
If it were replayed, many fans would think Busta is smart but used the rule in a dirty way. It is not honorable for Busta.
And I am not sure when a player requests a challenge, the umpire has the authority to reject it.
exactly. He wasn't able to return the ball even linesman didn't call out. But I think he was unlucky tho.
@@nicolasrivero3027
An empire can allow a challenge if it's requested without delay regardless of the outcome of the call that was already made.
This video has delayed sound. If you go to when the ball hit the net cord, the sound comes after the ball hit it. Watch the Japanese version instead.
ua-cam.com/video/UskJ-sjt4qs/v-deo.html&t=15
13:15ここ脚4本生えてるみたいで好き
ワロタ ｗ
テニス全然関係なくて草
qehbeler bizim dilde yazin gorum?sikim qehbe agzivizi deyim gorum niwikori niye finala cixa bilmir?
23 52 めっちゃじわる
UA-cam Geek gotuvuze qoyum ne yazmisiz deyirem niwikori niye finala zada cixa bilmir?dindix bizim dilde cvb verr
damn he was up 8 5 lead??? this is why emotions taking over is a bad thing
Emotion can make play you too aggresive or too safe when we should rely on our training instead of emotion.
Yes but emotions are why we are human and not robots. Sometimes we can't control it, especially after hours of gruelling mental and physical labour.
The wrong emotions taking over is a bad thing. He had emotions leading up to that call but they changed.
Thats hard to say when you are at crucial point of the match that can determine the winner. I feel for Busta and would be livid as well
yes verry sad he lost becouse of his emotions
It was Kei's point regardless whether it was in or out. Besides, Carreno was running to the opposite direction. Carreno wanted to take advantage of the rule after the fact the point was over just to see how things would go. But, the umpire made the correct decision and gave the point to Kei which he deserves. Kei had to hit the ball almost at the same time when the linesman was calling out which was already a distraction but he made it in while Carreno was running to the other direction. It would have been much more unfair for Kei if the point had to be replayed in this situation. The linesman made 2 mistakes. First one being that it was in fact in and he called it out. Second being that it was a late call. All the blames need to go to the linesman not to the umpire if one wants to blame someone for the situation. I think the umpire's mistake might have been to accept the challenge after the point was over at least to his mind which is irrelevant as to who actually won the point.
The umpire is obligated to accept the challenge from a player if the player calls immediately after a call is made by a linesman. Provided the player has 'challenges' left of course. It is not the umpires right to change 'the rules' in that situation.
mate, so basically, he lost the point because he hit the ball in. How is that fair?
@@wihanvandermerwe Nishikori was already hitting the ball as normal before the call was made. Carreno Busta was running in the opposite direction. It was a winner regardless of the (late) call made.
@@stevehughes1510 Considering it was such a late call, the umpire could have overruled the linesman's call immediately after it was made so that the ball is in, without accepting the player's challenge. Nishikori would not have challenged because he had already hit the ball and won the point. Though whether the player challenges or not does not affect the outcome as some people seem to believe.
@@johnrainmcmanus6319 except the call did not come before the ball was struck so your "RULE" does not apply
9:29 問題のシーン。ここでスピードを0.25にして見ると、錦織が打った後に線審がアウトと言ってるのがわかります。
相手は反対方向に走ってたし、１００％錦織の得点ですね。
awa dama
問題はチャレンジの請求を行う前に会場にジャッチの映像を流してしまったことですね。
アアァァァアアァァァアァアアウゥ！！！！
少なからず前ではないね、ほぼ同時か後やな
ほほほほいやっさ ブスタはチャレンジをコールしたみたいですよ、
そしてアンパイアはそれを承諾した。しかしこれがインでもアウトでも結局は錦織のポイントになってしまいますよね。この動画主さんはアンパイアがチャレンジを承諾した時点でチャレンジ成功ならポイントのやり直しをするべきだと主張しているみたいですね。あんまりテニス詳しくないので間違っているかもしれません。
まったくおなじことが英語でかいてあった
15:04 こんな大激戦を制したのに、大きなガッツポーズもすることなくクールな表情を見せる錦織がカッコよすぎる
疲れが勝ったみたいなこと言って気がする
I actually ballboyed for this match
Dang how hot was it out there
@@unowen7591unfortunately not, we do 1 hour on and off, and I was off during the last tiebreaker, but you can see me in the other videos of the full match
@@lukas6289 damn that’s so cool!!!! Who have you gotten to see up close? How is it? Let me know which one is you that’s awesome man
@@scottysatpanalysis I've done it for 3 years so is alot of matches, but the biggest players I've met are thiem, zverev, nadal, nishikori, shapovalov, Dimitri, monfils, tsitsipas...
How much they pay you
I almost always root for Nishikori. One of my favorite players on tour. Bad break for Carreno Busta, but this was awesome. And the bag slam was epic LOL
It didn't happen on the video though?
@@semu8030u crazy😂
@@considerate002they never actually showed him throwing the bad, that’s what he was referring to!
That ace was legendary
@GreaterGood510 hell yeah it does
@GreaterGood510 your a jack ass
Dung Nguyen kafshoj in 🇦🇱!
Robbed Match Ace.
Indeed it was
5 hours Imagine This game fognini vs umpire RIP umpire
Fognini and Busta should take up javelin throwing when they give up tennis
Mateus Henrique I have a feeling Fognini would be pissed but would just yell at nothing instead of charging the umpire
or troicki 😂
that tennis bag gonna be thrown upwards.
@@eldinpeso8868 or Wawrinka or McEnroe or kyrgios
Anger is often a sign of weakness. Pablo felt the pressure and collapsed
Often no. ALWAYS
There are many times in life when anger is not only justified, but demanded. When anger results in a loss of self-control, then that is the weakness...not the anger in itself.
Try playing 5 sets at that level, then come back and talk to us about this "weakness" lol
@@tomggabin5838 Well said
I felt his pain.
Nishikori… always a class act. Never had any tantrums or had caused any controversy. Never saw him break a racquet either.
Great Japanese Nishikori love and support from the Philippines. Viva Japan! We love Japan- Asia!!!
9:30 9:30
完全に逆方向走って行ってるから、仮に判定がインでインプレーだったとしても取れてないやろ。
アウトコールとほぼ同時に走り出してるし、判定聞いてから動いて無いよねこれ。
錦織が最後までプレーしたのに対して、ブスタも諦めてる様な動きに見えないわ流石に。
mi Re だとしても誤審したら流れが変わる
もうメンタルの勝負
そーゆー話じゃないんよね
公認ぼっち党員 いや、そういう話や笑笑
大仏さん 大仏さん 逆方向走ってるからとれてなかったとか、アウトコールの前に走ってるとか、そういうの関係ないだろ。前の人が言ってたように誤審したら流れ変わるし、結果インだったんだから抗議する価値はある。それに絶対に取れなかっただろうからって予想で点決めてたら不公平。ほとんど取れなかった球だけど0パーセントじゃない。
I feel his frustration but it should be more because of himself than the call. He was still up 2 points and on serve. He had opportunities to calm himself and serve it out but he didn't. Give credit to Kei for always staying calm even under tremendous amount of pressure.
No matter what the call is, the fact is Nishikori won the point either way. The umpire made the right decision that there’s no need to replay the point. If it’s out Nishikori won the point; if it’s in he won the point, too. Busta really lost the point and the match at that point because he lost his mental cool. If he accepted the call, the story might be different. Let’s enjoy the game and learn something from it.
TheWZINCLTD Nice comment😆
Well, your reasoning goes along lines that are not consistent with the rules of tennis. With your reasoning, indeed the Umpire was correct
You're wrong! if the line judge called wrongly out, and the umpire accepts the challenge, if the ball is in, they MUST replay the point. It doesn't matter that Busta was out of game or Nishikori hit the ball in, these are the rules...the umpire was wrong in this case, cause the challenge was accepted and the ball was in, they have must be replayed the point, even if this wouldn't have been fair to Nishikori, the mess has been done by the line judge, but these wrong calls happens and are part of tennis. These are the rules
@@dottorcarlone Logically it has to be Nishikori's point. If the rules say oppostite, they are bad rules and needs to be changed. I'm going with the umpire here.
@@dottorcarlone Go read hindrance rules you clueless sheep
he was no where near the ball... lol it would be bad to take that point away from Nishikori. calling out would not affect Busta as he was running the other way.
It would not be taking the point away from Kei. If the umpire accepts Busta challenge and see that the ball is in, the point must be repeated.
@@MegaJimyjames so, he was going to take the point from nishikori
And if nishi's ball was out, the point would have been repeated I'm sure. That's double standards.
Doesn't make a difference. Regardless of this, the umpire still allowed PCB to challenge and the call was overruled. When a ball is overruled the point must be replayed
@@MegaJimyjames Wrong, read the rule. Pablo would never return the ball, he was far away to the side. According to the rule, the point must go to Nishikori.
15:42 I forget that coach's name (the one beside Michael Chang) but I think Nishikori needs to keep him by his side no matter what! That guy is so loyal, and always viciously rooting for Kei. He is always up there providing positive yet also very tough and fighting energy in the big moments.
Dante bottini, argentinian
If anyone doubt that Kei got the benefit of the doubt on that call, look at Kei's face at 9:34. (I'm a Kei fan, but facts are facts.)
His face had nothing to do with rules of the game. The umpire made the right call. See Rule 36 in this link: www.usta.com/content/dam/usta/pdfs/2015_Code.pdf
Best norror
It’s simple, the only thing the out call Influenced was Kei’s follow through, in which he managed to handle. It’s an out or a winner, Kei’s point either way.
I don't agree with the description. Kei won the game by keeping it cool, amazing how he did it. I have not seen any other Kei's match, but that guy has a character, he kept it cool and did amazing. Both the players are amazing, but Carreno drama showed he is bit inferior.
I agree with you
No- I disagree with the situation at 9:20. Nishikori played it fair and square. Even if the ball was in play, Busta would have never been able to return it.
That's not the rule. If the referee shout out before Noshikori hits the ball, he can't win the point. In fact, that's why he was laughing after that
@@sergiovargas37 yes but it would have been completely unfair for nishikori if the paint was replayed
You cant judge a rule... Only because is the rule. And the rules are for respect them.
It's does not matter your opinion. Waste umpire.
Nishikori may not have the best possible technique, but his mental resilience is amazing. Pity that Carreno Busta could not convert the win due to nerves and emotions, but Kei certainly deserved it more.
Disculpa, más allá de los nervios, Carreño Busta fue perjudicado por el umpire, pésimo arbitro; el ojo de halcon se puso en tenis, por culpa del pésimo arbitraje de Mariana Alves, que perjudico a Serena Williams en el US OPEN 2004, y por los errores tan evidentes de esa jueza Portuguesa; y en este partido carreño Busta fue perjudicado por el mal arbitraje y canto malo del juez de línea.
Not the best possible technique? Are we watching the same Nishikori?
He does, his ability to strike the ball so cleanly and on the rise was insane
In his prime, Nishi had outstanding abilities
Nishikori switches strategy in the final set 6-8 scene.
Observe the mental of Carreno Busta and switch defensively.
It is the same as Nishikori, but I wanted to finish the game soon, but it was a clever scene of Nishiki with a self-explosion over time.
I agree with you. After that Nishikori start playing defensively and let PCB di mistakes because he was out of mental strength.
5 ma what language is that?
@@GlennDeBlock let's see your second language 🙂
15:04 is when the best starts
I don’t understand the argument. Whether out or returned nishi wins
この試合の何がいいって
日本人がカレノブスタのナイスプレーに拍手してるところだと思う
相手をたたえる尊敬に値する👏👏
Although I respect all the comments about what the rules are and how the call was questionable and may have changed the outcome of the match, let's just say that this match really reflects how tennis is a mental game. Kei showed that he was calm and continued to play great tennis. Carreno however, lost his cool and threw the match away. And yes I know that the call may have upset him as I have been in that situation myself, however tennis is not a game for the weak minded. You must be mentally strong and fight for every point regardless of what has just happened. I'm not saying that this will make you win every match but it certainly gives you the upper hand. This was a great match and both players played very well
Is it not the same in life?
Wow, what a strong mental game by Nishikori. This is what happens when you flip out coz of a single call without re-focusing and adjusting accordingly. Even if the point (net ball) carried on - Busta was more than halfway across the court - he was never going to return the eventual down the line shot. He should have let it go.
"The Chair Umpire must decide if the original “out” call
was a hindrance to either player. If it was a hindrance, the point
shall be replayed. If it was not a hindrance, the player who hit the
ball wins the point."
www.atptour.com/en/corporate/rulebook
Nishikori was mid-swing and Pablo was definitely sprinting to the other side BEFORE the call.
There was no hindrance to either player, hence the umpire awarded the point to the player that hit the ball.
That's good and all, but if that's the case, then the umpire should not accept the challenge in the first place. If the umpire accepts the challenge and the ball is in, then a let should be played.
@@robvadeberg of course; stupid comment of Ghur-guy
We are proud of you, Kei✨🇯🇵
錦織は気付かずに周りの人が気づいて叫んでるのなんか好き
For the record the call was made after he hit the ball. Listen to it at 0.25x speed.
True
Why does it matter though? It turned out to be out anyway?
@@Olledaddy No I think it was in. Busta then argued that the call came before Kei played the shot and the point should be replayed.
@@rbutthamilton but hawk eye showed that it was out???
OliverfromDenmark lost🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
It was a good game. They both played very well.
For me it was the right decision of the umpire. The out call was really late and there was no way for carreno Busta to reach the ball (either there wasn't a out call)
Why should the point be replayed? Busta was LITERALLY running the other way. He had zero chance of getting it back. Empire made the right call
I really dont understand Pablo's frustration with the umpire. He had no chance of winning that point, Nishikori placed the ball in.
I think he wanted the point to be replayed saying that the call came before nishikori hit the ball. But that wouldn't have been very fair at all to nishikori. He should have accepted it. Well, good that he lost then.
@@ignorance15bliss And the fact was Nishikori did play the ball before the call.
Which point?
The one he lost at 8-5 up
@@亞歴山大 That's difficult to ascertain. They need to show the angle from Busta's position.
Un gran partido del deporte blanco,grande el esfuerzo de los dos tenistas mis respetos para los dos jugadores Nishikori y Carreño Busta.🥎🥎🎾🥎🎾🥎🎾🎾🥎.👍👍.
Deporte blanco?
If your gonna take the point from him either way,why even let him challenge?
This reminds of the match between Troicki and Kei.
Because they got the right to? Lol
Nishikori hit that ball before the umpire called it out. Simple. 9:30
And Busta moved to wrong direction. He hopes that he can have a chance to reply.
Does it matter? Was carreno going to teleport and return the ball? No
Bryan Trinh exactly
Emotional melt down cost him the match.
True!
The thumbnail images are classic.
A stone cold finish for Nishikori, outstanding composure. Carreno Busta had lost his cool, resulting in the loss of his lead. I disagree with the caption, he was not robbed.
It is a point for Kei either way. Argument dragged Carreno down and cost him the match
The issue wasnt ‘In or Out’ but the position of Busta when Nishikori hit the ball. Let’s say Nishikori hit the ball and Busta was able to return the ball, the point would be repeated after the challenge.
Busta's position is irrelevant. Even Nishikori's last shot it's irrelevant if it goes in or out. There has been a call. The point ends as soon as the call is made.
Umpire should not give the point to kei. In my opinion it would have been better that the umpire decide to replay the point than give to kei. It was a crucial game and a mistake by the umpire. Anyway, congrats to kei
@@rafagoat575
Read Rule 36.
www.usta.com/content/dam/usta/pdfs/2015_Code.pdf
@@Coby2525
The umpire was doing his job by the book.
@@user-rl4rc8tc2y That rule applies in favour of the one challenging man! No taking into account the next hit!
the only wrong thing the umpire did is giving PCB the challenge.. there's no way he could get the point away from Nishikori..
what do you mean giving pcb the challenge. He does not have a choice, if a player challenges then the ball must be challenged. In this case,not replaying the point was a fatal error by the chair and it is outrageous to see this at this level.
@@lobogo777 He could have changed the call from the linesman
@@lobogo777 : The umpire is totally right. In the replay it's clear that PCB went to the right at the same time Nishikori hit to the left corner and at the same time the linesman called the ball out.
What was the point of giving a challenge when you would just ignore the outcome anyway? There were cases when players, moving in opposite direction, could still retrieve the ball. What looks like a clear winner won't apply to Nadal in some cases.
Exsactly
This was probably one of the best Final set tiebreaker of the year
Credit to both these fine players. I’ve lost to the same person, in the same tournament two consecutive years, having match points in both matches. Loss is hard but credit to the opponent who plays just a bit better in close matches.
Did you just described Djokovic vs Federer US open 2010~2011 SF 🤣😂
Federer, is that you?
Kei obviously hit the unreturnable winner at the same time the call was made making the out call irrelevant unless it somehow affected Carreno's ability to return Kei's shot, which of course it didn't. So the ump's decision was correct and a replay would be an underserved windfall for Carreno. Great match by Correno which he let slip away with misplaced anger.
But what happenss if Kei nets his own shot?
Wrong. Dead ball as soon as the out call is made. Replay the point, umpire blew this and ruined the match.
@@seanhillery1231 Only if the call occurred prior to the winner. Here the simultaneous call had no affect on the players. Its Kei who would therefore be robbed by a replay.
The point at 8-7, Nishikori was completely exploiting CB emotional state. The reaction after told Nishikori that he’s got him.
I hope people go softer on Djokovic after Busta's reaction at the end of the game.
And Busta is the one how criticize Djokovic.
Busta is not a popular tennis player neither someone that kids would like to be like. Djokovic forms part of the Big 3 and has to set an example. It´s different. Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic´s position comes with great responsability. Until now, only Roger and Rafa have proven to be gentlemen inside and outside the court and a great example for future players. That is why Nole is criticized so much, you can´t compare any of the big 3 with standard players.
@@diogens474 ,Yes I am hitting my doors when nobody around. And I am very nice in the eyes of others. I don't like people to see my devil's side. But luckily it stays by hitting doors and f.ing this and that.So you don't know Roger or Rafa.
@@mir-jan3496 i don´t care how they are in private. They are gentleman in the court and it seems the same way outside. Stop making up excuses.They are an example for sportmanship. The best two players ever.
Carreno hasn't recover since this match, has lost like 5 games in a row
yes right. He won again after a long time lol
@@dominicleroy7821 damn and now he lost to zverev after being up 2 sets
The decision of the umpire was perfect. This call “out” didn’t change anything to the issue of this point.
So why let him challenge?
@@freeskins715 cause Carreno thought the ball was out
The lineman called out before Kei hits it. Tbh it should be replay.
@@KS-fy6vq Actually the call came the exact same time Kei hits it. To be honest, there is no way the call affected Carreno given that he was already out of position to do anything to the ball when Kei hits it. Its arguable that the point should go to Carreno if the rule states point should be replayed if the call came the same time as the player hits it. But if so, then Kei would be robbed by the linesman. It'll be unfortunate for the other player either way.
Watch it again, in slow motion this time (0.25 speed). That will open your eyes.
Doesnt matter, he got robbed of a replay point
The point was still in play while Nei hit the ball. Technically Busta lost the point. Right call by umpire. Very simple. Know the rules. That’s why he’s the ump.
I know rules are rules. But you know what? Fuck them. Rules don't always address absolutely every single scenario. It's impossible. Sport is unpredictable. I personally don't see how a replay should be called when it clearly disadvantages one player who practically won the point. Nishikori would have been possibly robbed, completely out of his own control. Umpire made a great decision even if it was the wrong one. Carreno Busta should be ashamed of himself for his hissy fit over a point he NEVER deserved.
correct. Busta was not robbed at all. He was continuing with the point and was on the other side of the court. Ump played advantage and there was no way he would have got to the ball played down the line. Good call ump.
This match's linesman was so bad.Both of player doesn't have to care about that judgement.
I think so
10:27 I froze the image just when the linesman screams “out”, and Nishikori had just hit the ball, Bautista was running to his left and the ball was over the service square of the spaniard, so the voice of the linesman didn’t affect Bautista’s reaction.
He got so worked up about a point that he knew damn well he lost fair and square instead of focusing his energy on winning 2 more points
While he was leading too
5時間も戦ってたらイラってきてもしょうがないよね
ただこれに関しては八つ当たりでしかないけどね笑
@@大福-t8u
八つ当たりではないじゃないでしょうか。結果的に審判の裁定は正しかったわけですが、緊迫した場面で少なくとも線審のミスジャッジがあり、それにより若干気持ちが切れている感じがします。あれがミスジャッジなく、純粋に錦織がポイントを取っただけなら、まだカレーノブスタの優位には変わりなく、結果が違っていたかもしれません。
@@usagipannchi でも錦織にあたってない所にめっちゃ好感持てる
Ya but your boy kept his cool
Here it is simple : if the ball is out, Pablo loses the point, if it's in, whatever is called wouldn't change anything because he had already chosen the wrong way and got wrong footed, but his frustration is normal in such a key moment
Simple but false. If the umpire accepts the hawk-eye he must be consequent with it. If the ball is in, the point must be repeated. If the ball is out the point is for Nishikori. Those are the rules. The umpire should be sanctioned for such a crucial mistake. There is no place for "umpire's interpretation" in a hawk-eye.
The ball was in an there was a wrong call, but without any call, Pablo would have lost the point the same way because he made his choice BEFORE the call. Basically you replay the point when the call changes something in the point, this is logical
@@paullabbe6720 You are not understanding my point. It is irrelevant whether the call was made after Nishikori made the shot (which is debatable by the way). If the umpire ACCEPTS the hawk-eye then he should be consequent with it. There is no room for "umpire's interpretation" once he ACCEPTS the hawk-eye. If the ball is in, the point should be repeated. If the ball is out, the point is for Nishikori. Otherwise, why would he ACCEPT the hawk-eye? Following your logic, it is irrelevant whether the hawk-eye showed the ball in or out, the point would be anyway for Nishikori. To give the point to Nishikori by means of "interpretation", the umpire should not have accepted the hawk-eye. Once he accepted the hawk-eye, there is no room for interpretation, the rules are clear.
@@srkucrickk I think the umpire realised his mistake (accepting the challenge) too late to cancel it. So he decided to continue like there was no challenge, which was the most ''fair'' thing he could do.
btw if PCB had some character he would not argue and continue playing, he must have known he would never reach the ball.
@@miroslavjanecek9993 He commited the mistake of accepting the hawk-eye, thus he should follow it. The rules are clear. Crucial mistake, the umpire should be sanctioned. With that being said, congratulations to Nishikori who maintained the concentration and played great the last points.
15:29 Pablito: "aaaaaah CABROOOOOOON"
le dice al arbitro?
El wn ridículo
He actually says: “hijo de putaaaaaaaa! Cabroooooooon!”
🤣🤣🤣😁😁😁😜😜
Creo que le dijo "Hijo de puta" antes del "Cabrón"
14:59 かっこよすぎ
まじで集中力化け物やよな、こんな日本人これから現れるか不安になるレベルや
Repeating my comments as a reply to his comment but I thought I can also share here some insights in the main page.
Interesting view points. I think the problem here though, is that while the call is made as Kei is playing the point (it is mighty close, and people can say slow it down and what not, but on the court it would have been at the exact same time anyway), Pablo is already running away from the point and had made no attempts to come back from the ball even before the call was made. Therefore, he had and would have lost the point regardless of whether Hawk-eye ruled that it was in or not since it would not have affected the outcome of the point regardless. I think that was how the umpire made the conclusion that the point goes to Kei.
I do believe that the outcome of the call would be very different if Pablo’s momentum was towards the ball or made attempts to reach back for the ball. If he did that, then I think your argument holds true and point must be replayed.
THAT BEING SAID, honestly I think this is more a problem of the ruling instead of the umpire. If I am not mistaken, the ruling dictates that the umpire must make a judgment as to whether the player had any chance of retrieving the ball had the call been made differently. If they amended the rule to say that in all circumstances, where calls are made incorrectly and challenged correctly, all points must be replayed regardless, we wouldn’t have so many arguments and debates.
On the point around allowing Pablo to challenge the call regardless, I think the umpire had explained to Pablo that regardless of the outcome he will lose the point, but Pablo did not rescind his challenge at that point (of course he was in argument over other matters). Unfortunately I don’t think umpire has the authority to NOT allow the challenge to take place, no matter how ridiculous it is. That decision is entirely in the hands of the player.
This will hopefully become a non-issue as they begin to have automatic line-calling by hawkeye.
@@drtslim Nah, it will present other forms of issues. Just look at VAR haha. As long as there is a human element to the decision making, there will always be judgment calls and issues. It's all part of sports lol
@@Riverrattie87 If the line calls are automatic, play will not be interrupted by close calls. It's taking out the human element.
Kei ~ san.
You are great a tennis player. You are great fighter ! So hard a match. You deserve win ! Take care yourself and quick a recovery. 💪
どんなプレイヤーも一球に賭けてるし、我武者羅に一点を取りに行ってて本当にかっこいい。
チャレンジ許した審判が問題だろ
どちらにしろ錦織のポイントなんだし
確かにそうです。
ごもっともです(笑
どうゆうことなんですか？
あいあいおー アウトでもインでもエース級のショット決めてる錦織のポイント確定してるから審判はチャレンジを許してはいけない場面だった
@@さささぴ ライン上に落ちてるのに、アウトの判定されたからチャレンジしたのかな？
で、チャレンジ成功したから、ポイントのやり直しをするもんだとカレノブスタは考えたのでは。
I'm not a tennis fan as such but I have to admire the self control and composure of Nishikori. What an example to up and coming young players. Surely so called professionals MUST reign in their anger in public. I know it's the heat of the moment but shouldn't this be addressed in training? I do let off steam myself when playing Badminton but given that I am in my 70s I've learned to do this hopefully in an amusing - not aggressive- way! Anyway, good match.
Was there any official game report ?
I am just curious how they handled about that call.
It was a good call - as in it had no impact on the point
This one is really tough, 99% of the time it's pretty clear for me who's in the right or wrong! By the time Kei makes contact with the ball a fraction of a second later the line's man calls OUT. 1 thing is clear the OUT call did NOT hinder Carreno since he was running the other way! Both outcomes are possible here, the Umpire could've played LET or give the point to the opponent and he choose the latter! IF the ball was OUT he would've given the point to Kei anyway, so it should only be fair IF the ball is in that there should be a LET!
exactly right my friend
Nop, call was after ball contact.
It's completely irrelevant whether the call came before or after Nishikori hit the ball. the only thing that matters is whether the umpire overruled the linesman call (he didn't) and whether he accepted the challenge. After not overrulling and accepting PBC to challenge it should be completely out of his hands.
@@msalvs The linesman called OUT so PBC has the right to challenge that call and he was right the ball was IN so there should've been a LET.
The linemen's call was RELEVANT because that's what the Umpire based his decision upon, he said to PBC that the call came after Kei had made contact and that he couldn't have gotten to the ball because he was running the other way! IF this was an ace it would've been a much easier decision!
nacea Gema
To Dear Dominic Leroy.
P. HINDRANCE
1. Hindrance by Officials
a. If the call is corrected from “Out” to “Good”, then a Let must be played ”unless the Chair Umpire in his/her sole judgment determines that it was a clear ace or a clear winning shot that the player could not possibly have retrieved”.
If there is any reasonable possibility that such a ball could have been played, then the player must be given the benefit of the doubt.
In this case, according to above a : "the Chair Umpire in his sole judgment determines that it was a very clear Nishikori's winning shot that the player PCB could not absolutely have retrieved”, so a Let mustn't be played. That's a rule, and so I think correct Justice.
Thanks for the information. I appreciate.
マイケルチャン泣きそうになってる。まぁ感動するわな
para este AO 22, nishikori nos hará mucha falta, sus partidos son muy entretenidos :(
錦織選手カッコよすぎる。
鳥肌止まらんかった
Most times - if an incorrect call is made and the player has a play on the ball, the point is replayed. Nishikori was right there at the net, so he had a play on the ball when it was called; the call didn't affect his next shot. At that time of the match, it just stings that much more. It would have been nice if they replayed the point just to make it 100% fair. But PCB has to reset. He totally lost it after that, and lost the match as a result. But that's a bitter, bitter way to lose. Ouch.
He was right. It doesn't matter what was his position when Nishikori hit the last shot. It doesn't matter if Nishikori's shot went in or out. The linesman made a mistake. THE POINT IS OVER AS SOON AS THE LINESMAN CALLS OUT. That's what Busta is saying, he is not responsable for the linesman's mistake.
Exactly the umpire can overrule the call of linesman. Been better if they replayed the point. But anyway all is done already kei won..🤗
A replay is only legit and allowed if Carreno Busta had a play on Nishikori's shot. Carreno Busta had no play on the ball because he was running in the opposite direction. This is a case of hindrance and there is a rule for that and the umpire called it by the book.
9:29 もうここで集中力切れちゃってる感じだね
誤審ではあったけどそもそも自分が全くとれない打球が返ってきてたんだから冷静になってすぐ次のポイントのことを考えてたりしたら勝負は分からなかったね
海外コメで錦織褒められてて自分のことのように嬉しい。
Didn't expect this from a top seeded player like carreno, having so much vast experience in this game. Arguing for 1point when your are significantly leading. I hope he has learnt his lesson. Umpire's decision is final!!!
錦織は見ててほんとに楽しいプレーをする。
こっちまで熱くなる。
The thumbnail is amazing
Micheal Chang is a good coach, and good job Nishikori never give up, it ain’t over til it’s over.
Michael Chang was a fighter too!
Never ever Carreño Busta would have reached to that ball anyway
Carreno Busta should have just left it at that at the argument because he still had all the momentum and just slowing it down caused the momentum to shift in Nishikori’s favor. Im really happy that Nishikori won though.
The call was slightly after Kei's shoot. It was Nishikori's point either way. The only thing the judge did wrong is accepting the Carreno's challenge. It would be totaly wrong and unfair to replay the point. The rule is a rule but the judge is here to prevent to take an unfair advantage of the rule.