Hello Dr. Mike, So I watched this video many times. Till now I don't understand how the sample rate equals the number of time points?? because you seem to visualize the srate/2 at the middle between 0 and N. Can you clarify that a bit more if you have time? Thank you
The sampling rate determines the number of points in 1 s. I suppose that in this example we take period T=1s, thus the sampling rate equals the total number of points.
If frequency increases in SHM, so does the acceleration. But does it make sense that high frequencies impose such a high acceleration? How do you account for this biased acceleration given by high frequencies. For instance, for SHM, a=( 2*pi*f)^2. How do you account for the fact that lower frequencies have more detrimental effects that high frequencies?
Hello Dr. Mike,
So I watched this video many times.
Till now I don't understand how the sample rate equals the number of time points?? because you seem to visualize the srate/2 at the middle between 0 and N. Can you clarify that a bit more if you have time? Thank you
The sampling rate determines the number of points in 1 s. I suppose that in this example we take period T=1s, thus the sampling rate equals the total number of points.
It is basically a frequency : number of points in one period.
@@desrucca to find out the truth of "one period" study Fields Medal math professor Alain Connes. thanks
If frequency increases in SHM, so does the acceleration. But does it make sense that high frequencies impose such a high acceleration? How do you account for this biased acceleration given by high frequencies. For instance, for SHM, a=( 2*pi*f)^2. How do you account for the fact that lower frequencies have more detrimental effects that high frequencies?
If the signal points are in weeks, does that mean the sample rate is 1/52? Or if in days the sampling rate is 1/365? Great videos thank you!
Thank you very much