Fly American! 1933

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Early American Airways promotional film with twin engine Curtiss Condor airplanes showing plane interiors and passengers, airport facilities, pilots and cockpit, map with destinations at that time, chart showing passenger growth from 1928 to 1933.Footage from this subject is available for licensing from www.globalimageworks.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 834

  • @rcstann
    @rcstann 4 роки тому +18

    4:40 "if you like the picture of Darkeese loading cotton.".
    Well that went South...

    • @rcstann
      @rcstann 4 роки тому +4

      @Waxel Punkt.
      "Getting used to it" is precisely the problem.
      You'd better be able to define an endpoint to this phenomena, because soon it will be your turn, as our Robot Overlords decide whether we are to be treated as pets, mere livestock or simply protein.

    • @ChatGPT1111
      @ChatGPT1111 10 днів тому +1

      You noticed that too, wow!

  • @sammey1919
    @sammey1919 5 років тому +65

    They edited out the King Kong incident.

  • @michaelrutledge7048
    @michaelrutledge7048 5 років тому +23

    My dad (yes, my dad) use to fly in the late 20s, into the 30s. He also flew early airmail (Jenny's)... first Detroit/Chicago, via stops throughout Michigan. Then, up/down the west coast (Ryans, Junkers, Fokkers), Seattle/San Fran and Sacramento/San Fran/San Diego. Made three jumps due to engine failure/out of gas, and two crashes, both of which he (obviously) survived. Then, early passenger/freight (TriMotors) Midwest to West Coast. Of course, all this happened long before I was around. He was 20 years older than my mother, and I was last of three to be born. I’ve flown in a 4-AT a couple of times, here in Florida. Never gets old. Also, flew in a 4-AT to Put-in-Bay and the lake islands when I was a youth growing up in Toledo, OH. I’m thrilled to see so much interest in the golden age of aviation that my dad was a part of. Too many things get lost in the jet fast world of today.

  • @HobartZircon
    @HobartZircon 12 років тому +62

    Sorry folks, but political correctness is not retroactive.
    That's the way it was.

    • @leandroitapolis
      @leandroitapolis 4 роки тому +23

      Fuck political correctness.

    • @abandonedchannel281
      @abandonedchannel281 4 роки тому +11

      Wtf does that have to do with anything, silly boomers if you wanna complain about something do it in the Fox News comment section not here

    • @banjo2019
      @banjo2019 4 роки тому +6

      Idiot racists. They just can’t stop complaining. To be fair this video from 1933 was probably from when they were 20 or so, so they’re getting emotionally triggered by watching it.

    • @bridgetstoli2347
      @bridgetstoli2347 4 роки тому +1

      These comments are a test for assholes.

    • @jamiebrown8608
      @jamiebrown8608 4 роки тому +5

      @@abandonedchannel281 That boomer shit is getting old. I'm makes you seem so stupid. Grow the fuck up!

  • @marknc9616
    @marknc9616 5 років тому +57

    12:46 - Their route map. Notice that to get to LA they go via Phoenix. This keeps them from crossing any high mountains. They don't serve SF or Seattle or SLC or Denver. These destination cities would require them flying at altitudes to cross the Rocky Mountains and other ranges. This would require cabin pressurization. This would also reduce engine power (~ 3% loss per 1k feet). This would force them to carry a lighter load or more fuel thus more weight.

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому +2

      Mark-- Only a little true. You're correct that those planes were not ready to cross the Rockies, and thus no routes from NY or Chicago to Seattle or SF. But why no routes from LA to SF & Seattle? Why no routes from NY or Chicago to Denver? Not enough businessman passengers at that time for those routes.

    • @stevedgrossman
      @stevedgrossman 5 років тому +3

      @@lesizmor9079 This was NOT the only airline flying at the time.

    • @BrassLock
      @BrassLock 2 роки тому +1

      @@stevedgrossman Tru Dat. QANTAS commenced flying in Queensland and Northern Territory Australia in 1920. By 1935 QANTAS and British Airways were flying internationally. Its good to know that the Americans finally caught onto the ideas of flying long distances. Australia was a pioneer of airline travel.

  • @rickm6076
    @rickm6076 3 роки тому +6

    The actress, Fay Wray, actually needed to get to NYC to star in King Kong 1933! She lived to be nearly 100 btw. Crazy long life

  • @HimJimRimDim
    @HimJimRimDim 9 років тому +183

    Well, I'll tell ya one thing. Those old planes didn't go that high and they were slow by today's standards but the passengers got one hell of an awesome view of the landscape.

    • @fairfaxcat1312
      @fairfaxcat1312 5 років тому +6

      The preceding exchange by two of our fine UA-cam commentators contains scatological references. Why do we think this kind of discourse is OK in an otherwise innocuous discussion of the earlier days of commercial flight of all things?

    • @justintime995
      @justintime995 5 років тому +3

      @@fairfaxcat1312 ANYTHING is fair game these days. MAGA, pff.

    • @chooch1995
      @chooch1995 4 роки тому +2

      @Kevin Prima - Trump??? Had to go there, didn't 'ya!! Relax.....5 more years & he'll be history, my friend!

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 4 роки тому +1

      @@foobarmaximus3506 Sure you did. I hope my memory plays nice tricks like that when I reach your age.

    • @台獨萬歲-h4l
      @台獨萬歲-h4l 4 роки тому

      People were allowed to smoke on the plane during the journey

  • @videopokernetwork6824
    @videopokernetwork6824 3 роки тому +9

    I've been on hold with American since 1933

  • @lasuvidaboy
    @lasuvidaboy 15 років тому +70

    The class of passenger was very different in those days. Flying was reserved for the wealthy and was out of the average person's reach.

    • @MrHiBeta
      @MrHiBeta 5 років тому +2

      lasuvidaboy We still have first class in a lot of airline carriers if you like a higher level of service and possible passenger.

    • @Me-yh4uc
      @Me-yh4uc 4 роки тому

      lasuvidaboy
      You state the obvious

    • @МихаилВишняковский
      @МихаилВишняковский 4 роки тому +2

      @SeaDub II You think the wealthy are more deserving than the poor?

    • @JohnMichaelson
      @JohnMichaelson 4 роки тому +13

      @@МихаилВишняковский Not necessarily, but "the poor" and average folks that can afford to fly don't need to act like the inconsiderate trash they often do. Flying wasn't taken for granted back then as it is now. I wouldn't fly for anything less than a dire emergency any more.

    • @truecrimeobserver
      @truecrimeobserver 4 роки тому +2

      John Michaelson thanks

  • @bkucinschi
    @bkucinschi 5 років тому +23

    Watching this film made me understand clearly how revolutionary DC3 was for the time.

    • @LarryButler-kp3se
      @LarryButler-kp3se 6 місяців тому

      Search youtube for Buffalo Airways and fly northern Canada with the McBrydes' antiques still holding scheduled flights with people and freight.

  • @costernocht
    @costernocht 15 років тому +33

    I've watched this a half-dozen times, and I'm still not sick of it. Thank you for posting!

  • @Robbi496
    @Robbi496 5 років тому +115

    This was back in day when companies believed that good customer service was what brought greater profits, NOT cutting costs!

    • @soulscanner66
      @soulscanner66 5 років тому +15

      Only the very rich flew in 1933. It's the equivalent of executive class today. Most traveled by horse drawn automobile because they couldn't afford the gas.

    • @soulscanner66
      @soulscanner66 5 років тому +2

      @Micah Lall-Trail A lot of people couldn't afford that either.

    • @jetfowl
      @jetfowl 5 років тому +7

      @@soulscanner66 Horse-drawn automobile?!?

    • @soulscanner66
      @soulscanner66 5 років тому +2

      @@jetfowl en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bennett_buggy

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 5 років тому +3

      @@soulscanner66 They didn't have time for horse-drawn automobile because they had to wait in line all day for the soup kitchen

  • @treblecleff11
    @treblecleff11 12 років тому +18

    This video brings back memories of watching an American Airways twin engine Curtiss Condor taxii to the end of a cinder runway for takeoff, which was right in front of me, my Father and my Brother, at Boston Airport now Logan in 1932.

  • @johneddy98033
    @johneddy98033 13 років тому +21

    Three years after this film was made, American introduced the Douglas DC-3, the most famous aircraft of its day, and made non-stop travel between Chicago and New York possible.

  • @theevilmeister
    @theevilmeister 12 років тому +19

    "You can go from Boston to Los Angeles in a little more than a day". Hehe

  • @gregghanson6095
    @gregghanson6095 5 років тому +16

    "our genial fat friend" "darkes loading the ship" Good god!!

  • @jimjonrs3932
    @jimjonrs3932 4 роки тому +9

    Banging around in the weather with those props making you deaf. You bet! The good ole days!

  • @theislanddweller1335
    @theislanddweller1335 8 років тому +35

    So....back then folks went to Detroit for a honeymoon?

    • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
      @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 5 років тому +7

      And a well paying job.

    • @hankaustin7091
      @hankaustin7091 5 років тому +16

      yes, people would purposely travel to Detroit years before it became the world's biggest ghetto...

    • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
      @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 5 років тому +7

      Back when Detroit won WW2.

    • @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
      @Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu 5 років тому +3

      @Asimzmn Should have seen it in 43-63.

    • @fairfaxcat1312
      @fairfaxcat1312 5 років тому +5

      Lol back before urban America, aided and abetted by the mainstream media, was universally highjacked by Democrat mayors, council members, prosecutors, crime, waste, and illicit drug leniency. When will wise residents in America’s cities annoy the media and break their addiction to the Democrat Party?

  • @macsdaddy3383
    @macsdaddy3383 5 років тому +41

    "Every passenger a First Class passenger", I don't think AA follows that one any longer.

    • @CJbrinkman602
      @CJbrinkman602 5 років тому +4

      None of them do

    • @TheReadBaron91
      @TheReadBaron91 4 роки тому +6

      Hey but you can afford to fly!

    • @trivet1970
      @trivet1970 4 роки тому

      hardly

    • @KateLove21
      @KateLove21 3 роки тому +1

      I'm glad those of us who aren't super rich can travel. And those with buckets of money can still shell out as much as these people did and fly first(or eveb better) class. Honestly the longest flight on earth today is maybe 20 hours, you can suffer the length of most flights. Take a sleeping pill and you'll be there before you know it. Enjoy the fact that you can travel because back then you'd see little more than your hometown.

    • @starlight122012
      @starlight122012 3 роки тому

      you'd be lucky to even get off the ground on AA without the plane going tech or your 6pm flight being cancelled, sorry I mean delayed until 6am the next day!

  • @andyburk4825
    @andyburk4825 5 років тому +14

    Those people were so trusting to ride on those old crates. Convective storms in summer, ice and snow in the winter. No flying above the weather back then.

    • @gcrav
      @gcrav 5 років тому +3

      It took years to restore trust in airplane safety after the Knute Rockne crash.

  • @leegraves8878
    @leegraves8878 9 років тому +45

    This is amazing the curtiss condor was obsolete 2 years after it first flew. The dc3 first flew in 1935.

    • @dfirth224
      @dfirth224 8 років тому +5

      +lee graves The DC 3 was a direct result of the crash of a Fokker Trimotor that killed famous football coach Knute Rockne.

    • @kennethcrowther2277
      @kennethcrowther2277 7 років тому +11

      dfirth224 Hardly the direct result! That rather oversimplifies the genius behind the development of air travel & aeronautical engineering & design & the DC3 in particular.

    • @EricJamesHanson
      @EricJamesHanson 6 років тому +5

      Actually an outgrowth of the DC2 which was an answer to the Boeing (was it 247?) Progress came very rapidly in that industry. @@dfirth224

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому +5

      Thanks Lee--- Was hoping someone could name the aircraft.

    • @wholeNwon
      @wholeNwon 5 років тому +3

      And I flew in a DC-3. Time flies, too.

  • @gheffz
    @gheffz 4 роки тому +11

    Love it! Love all this "old" stuff of the way we use to live and were we came from ... these archives are precious reminders!

  • @p8ryot
    @p8ryot 9 років тому +54

    14:50 "Cigars and babies must have been invented at the same time" I learn so much from these wonderful vintage productions.

    • @miker252
      @miker252 4 роки тому +1

      That explains Bill Clinton's confusion.

    • @rickm6076
      @rickm6076 3 роки тому +1

      And that actress is Fay Wray. Flying to NYC to star in King Kong 1933

  • @NP4Mayans
    @NP4Mayans 14 років тому +14

    Aerial shots of cities that no longer look like this: this is cool history.

  • @Rayo_Rob_No.17
    @Rayo_Rob_No.17 11 років тому +16

    In these early days, most of these passenger planes had a ceiling of only 5000 feet. They had non pressurized cabins and were every bit like a railroad chair car. The turbulence these planes would endure at this lower altitude wasn't as smooth and cozy as they'd like you to believe. This is a clear window into the early days of passenger air travel. :-) Love it!

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 5 років тому +2

      It really depends on the weather. I've flown in small private planes, mid size, and 747's. The worst? An American Eagle prop job, I think it had 21 seats. We flew through a hurricane to get to St Thomas. Flight attendant was bouncing all over the place, trying to serve us snacks and drinks. The pilot didn't tell us until after we arrived. Apparently we flew over it. It was still VERY turbulent. 747 was like sitting in my living room; but that was on a nice sunny day; we also arrived 45 minutes early.

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому

      35GE--- More like 8000 feet. Above 10,000 for any length of time, then people need more oxygen.

    • @davidbsac
      @davidbsac 5 років тому +2

      FAA rules: above 12,500' for more than 30 minutes - the pilot(s) needs oxygen. Above 14,000 for any length of time - the pilot(s) needs oxygen. This is for unpressurized aircraft.
      91.211 Supplemental oxygen.
      (a)General. No person may operate a civil aircraft of U.S. registry -
      (1) At cabin pressure altitudes above 12,500 feet (MSL) up to and including 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen for that part of the flight at those altitudes that is of more than 30 minutes duration;
      (2) At cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000 feet (MSL) unless the required minimum flight crew is provided with and uses supplemental oxygen during the entire flight time at those altitudes; and
      (3) At cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet (MSL) unless each occupant of the aircraft is provided with supplemental oxygen.

  • @teto85
    @teto85 5 років тому +6

    About this time American Airlines was looking for a new airplane. They settled on the Boeing 247. The 247 was such a leap forward that production could not keep up with demand. American and TWA "settled" on the Douglas DC-2 and got first dibs on the DC-3. The Boeing 247 faded into obscurity. DC-3s are still flying today.

    • @gcrav
      @gcrav 5 років тому +2

      The 247 was strictly for United, then American sent a request to Douglas for a plane to compete with the 247. Douglas' answer was the DC-2. The DC-3 was the first airliner that could turn a profit from passenger service.

  • @richterkleiber
    @richterkleiber 4 роки тому +9

    2:45 “Hmmm! The’ run this place like a reg’lar dee-pōh.” Young dude with smirk: “It is a dee-pōh, granddad, an äîr dee-pōwh.”

    • @emtpilot132
      @emtpilot132 4 роки тому +5

      That kid probably fought in World War II.

  • @wakkowarner4288
    @wakkowarner4288 10 років тому +20

    Amazing to see how it was, and how much of it still survives today. Seat-back pockets, individual light and air vent, narrow seats with not much legroom.. reclining seatback.. newspapers instead of wifi, but hey. Boarding's still much the same. And you fly so low! That plane didn't have more than 5000 ft between the tires and the ground. Next time you're doing 550 mph in the smooth-air stratosphere at 40.000 ft think of this film, and how they were doing 150-ish at much less than 10,000 ft -- where it is really, horribly bumpy at times. You really did have a good chance of death flying those old airplanes. Then think how safe you have it in the modern jet.

    • @WitchidWitchid
      @WitchidWitchid 9 років тому +9

      Yeah, but at those altitudes the passengers were treated to a really awesome view of the landscape. Unless you fly your own small plane or helicopter that's a view you rarely get these days except just after takeoff and just before landing. I would have loved to fly in one of those old airliners. Must have been quite an experience.

    • @wakkowarner4288
      @wakkowarner4288 9 років тому +5

      +WitchidWitchid Oh, I agree. Jet Flight for convenience and safety, and for that you-won't-see-it-anywhere-else deep indigo of 40,000 ft and up.. but there's much to be said about 8000 ft in an unpressurized DC-3, doing maybe 110 kts. That, in and of itself, is an experience any airplane buff should have at least once.

    • @EricJamesHanson
      @EricJamesHanson 6 років тому

      DC3s cruised routinely at 180-190mph which is 150? knots.
      @@wakkowarner4288

    • @wakkowarner4288
      @wakkowarner4288 6 років тому +2

      DC-3 is a million years more advanced than the Condor ;o)
      @@EricJamesHanson I'd trust my life to any dc-3, anywhere. Love 'em.

    • @RatPfink66
      @RatPfink66 5 років тому

      The rate of progress in aviation in the 1930s was nothing short of astounding. And not a little of it was due to the knowledge that there would surely be another world war...and that it would be in great part, an air war.

  • @lindaeasley4336
    @lindaeasley4336 5 років тому +16

    Untill the 1980s , air travel was not something regular folks did very often . It was something only people with alot of money could afford

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 5 років тому +9

      Regular folks went nowhere. 1933 was the depths of the depression. Regular folks were lucky if they could afford enough food to eat. My parents and their siblings lived through the depression, and oh, the stories they told. And all of THEM were employed!

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому +1

      @@d.e.b.b5788 Take it easy DEBB--- Linda's comment was about a very long time period: the beginning of air transport until the 1980's. She didn't single out 1933 as you have done.

    • @lylecosmopolite
      @lylecosmopolite 5 років тому

      Air travel really took off right after WW2, when two fine piston airliners went into service: the Lockheed Constellation and the DC-7. These aircraft could carry 90+ passengers, fly 350mph with a range of 5000m+, and had pressurised cabins. I would guess that more half of all passengers in those days were flying on expense account.

    • @lylecosmopolite
      @lylecosmopolite 5 років тому

      @James Sempy The transition from piston to jets was a peaceful one, much welcomed.

    • @lylecosmopolite
      @lylecosmopolite 5 років тому

      Linda Easley For those on expense accounts, the DC-4 and 6, and the Connie, had made air travel the norm by 1950, both domestically and internationally. Because it was much faster.
      For those not on expense accounts, there was a big shift from train/boat to air during the 1950s. Jets killed crossing the North Atlantic by boat. During the 1960s, jets led to a huge increase in international holiday air travel. My family of orogin numbered 5. We were far from rich, but we flew to San Francisco in 1961 and 64, France in 1962 and 66, and to Mexico City in 1969.

  • @HuckleberrySlim
    @HuckleberrySlim 14 років тому +20

    "It is a depot, grandad, an air depot!"

    • @Aboladeishola
      @Aboladeishola 4 роки тому +2

      That part makes me laugh

    • @richterkleiber
      @richterkleiber 4 роки тому +2

      That made me laugh so hard

    • @unelectedleader6494
      @unelectedleader6494 3 роки тому +2

      To think that kid could’ve been dead just a decade later in World War II and that’s now been a literal lifetime ago

  • @brucemonts6530
    @brucemonts6530 8 років тому +45

    air travel is not perfect 2day.... but those people didn't realize how unsafe those planes were and all the trial and error flight travel was done to make flying as safe as it is 2day.

    • @lincolnpaul1814
      @lincolnpaul1814 5 років тому +2

      Bruce Monts it not perfectly safe today

    • @johnsmilowitz
      @johnsmilowitz 5 років тому +12

      @@lincolnpaul1814 Look at the stats, air travel is the safest mode to get anywhere. People get bent out of shape when there is a plane crash. You you realize how many planes fly on a daily basis, thousands a day and they all travel safely. I hate when people who don't know what they are talking about and talking out of there ass makes me want to puke.

    • @timothykissinger4883
      @timothykissinger4883 5 років тому

      Check out the 1923 passenger plane from Handley Page Transport from London to Paris.It has folding wings.On Utube

    • @Makeyourselfbig
      @Makeyourselfbig 5 років тому +6

      Actually typing in "to" is a bit much then?

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 5 років тому +2

      2day, really?

  • @hebneh
    @hebneh 11 років тому +10

    I look forward to the American Airlines limousine picking me up and taking me directly to the airport to board the giant 18-passenger aeroplane. Why, the time I'll save by flying will more than defray the cost of the ticket!

  • @sandydennylives1392
    @sandydennylives1392 5 років тому +24

    Depression? What Depression? Fly above it all with AA.

  • @davechristian7543
    @davechristian7543 2 роки тому +4

    and then Covid hit

  • @wcstflyer
    @wcstflyer 16 років тому +7

    The voice-over announcer in this video was more famous in another role. Clue: "We're millionaires boys! I'll share it with all of you!" And later a more dubious claim: "Don't worry ladies and gentlemen, those chains are made of chrome steel." It's King Kong's Robert Armstrong.

  • @anonov1
    @anonov1 11 років тому +22

    Yeah...air travel has changed. Takes longer to get through security and boarded at the terminal than the flight duration..

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 5 років тому

      anonov1 maybe if you are flying from Detroit to Chicago. Time where driving beats a direct flight is 4-5 hours.

    • @kindratia5623
      @kindratia5623 4 роки тому

      Yeah, but plane hijackings were a common occurrence back then.

  • @anjojune
    @anjojune 15 років тому +5

    funny now one can go by car to NY from Chicago the same time it took that plane to fly the same route..

  • @martinusher1
    @martinusher1 8 років тому +100

    1933, the depths of the Depression -- some had the money, most didn't.
    (I liked the air terminal. Not a metal detector in sight!)

    • @zelphx
      @zelphx 5 років тому +26

      Not a Muslim in sight.

    • @johnsmilowitz
      @johnsmilowitz 5 років тому +4

      Yes, times were different and simpler, but dumb people wanted things to be controlled for their likings. They just couldn't leave things alone, it's all about greed and control. They go hand in hand.

    • @hschwie1
      @hschwie1 5 років тому +2

      John Smilowitz Guess who’s 'invented‘ metal detectors or rather the need for them, some time in the 70s

    • @johnsmilowitz
      @johnsmilowitz 5 років тому +6

      @@hschwie1 I really don't care who did, my point was people had more freedom to board a plane than today, most of TSA workers think their shit don't stink and are smarter than you, but it's just the opposite, they are as dumb as a log.

    • @RADIUMGLASS
      @RADIUMGLASS 5 років тому +3

      @@zelphx lol

  • @matiasferreyra1014
    @matiasferreyra1014 5 років тому +5

    Given away cigars to other fellers, just great!@@

  • @earlyhemibill
    @earlyhemibill 11 років тому +9

    If you look closely at about 2:00 in, there is a smaller trimotor loading behind the Condor. It is a Stinson Airliner model U. It is also seen at about 6:13 nestled between 2 Condors, and at 17:38 crossing in front of the camera. It can carry 10 and was powered by 3 Lycoming R-680 radials rated at 275 HP. It had a span of 66 ft. Not visible are the short stubby wings that span out to the engines. They were thick and opened up to carry luggage and mail. They only made about 2 dozen of them. Quite a unique airplane, it was drawn by William Wylam for Flying Models Magazine back in the 60s.

    • @createdeccentricities6620
      @createdeccentricities6620 5 років тому

      Thanks for the intersting details. The Tri-motor was the only plane I recognized.

  • @WAL_DC-6B
    @WAL_DC-6B 9 років тому +28

    Wonderful film of American Airlines predating the arrival of the much more modern DC-2. The Curtiss Condor bi-plane airliner is the star of this film, but also seen at the airport (Chicago Municipal Airport when the terminal was at the southeast corner of what's now Midway Airport) is an AA single engine PIlgrim 100A at 5:50 as well as some Stinson "U" and "T" tri-motors. Great shot of the St Louis riverfront with the steamboats tied down. Thanks for sharing this terrific vintage airline film!

    • @erikhertzer8434
      @erikhertzer8434 6 років тому +3

      Dan Uscian : Biplane Curtiss Condor airliners, aka : “Flying Brooklyn Bridges”

    • @ricarleite
      @ricarleite 5 років тому +1

      There is NO WAY I would fly one of those death traps!

    • @hankaustin7091
      @hankaustin7091 5 років тому +3

      @@ricarleite if it's the only plane available, and you're living in 1933, I'm pretty sure you'd fly in it, given you had enough money to purchase a ticket. You can't think in 2019 terms about safety because all the snowflake safety nuts weren't around in 1933.

    • @bulldogbrower6732
      @bulldogbrower6732 8 місяців тому

      A wonderful film ?? A racist shit show if I’ve ever seen one. Darkees ! Did you know only whites could be passengers ?

  • @EricIrl
    @EricIrl 8 років тому +15

    I notice the teenager is very "modern" -m considering it's 1933. He even has a pre-printed T-Shirt.

    • @mv5203
      @mv5203 7 років тому +5

      Embroidered T, not printed

    • @johnp139
      @johnp139 5 років тому +1

      He looks gay, not that there’s anything wrong with that .

    • @internezzo
      @internezzo 5 років тому

      He’s fucken hot.

    • @tommyboybr
      @tommyboybr 4 роки тому

      I think that that’s a sweater because he is wearing a shirt underneath.
      He did look “modern” for 1930's indeed.

  • @MikeJ2023
    @MikeJ2023 7 років тому +18

    Does any one else think the fat guy at 9:26 looks like John Candy?

  • @unelectedleader6494
    @unelectedleader6494 3 роки тому +3

    That old guy literally saw the transition in his life from horses to cars to planes. If he lived to be 100 he might’ve seen space-age

  • @tejaswivemulapati287
    @tejaswivemulapati287 5 років тому +44

    “darkies loading cotton?”

    • @davidhoffman1278
      @davidhoffman1278 5 років тому +5

      Yes, that is a way some of the Black dock workers were called back then.

    • @jmfa57
      @jmfa57 4 роки тому +7

      Yeah, WOW. My jaw dropped when I heard that.

    • @pauld9561
      @pauld9561 4 роки тому +1

      "Old man rivaaaaaaaaa!"

    • @trplpwr1038
      @trplpwr1038 4 роки тому

      1933

    • @kenster865
      @kenster865 4 роки тому +6

      This was over 85 years ago. Don't judge it by today's standards as that was a different time with values unlike today. Put it in historical context only. Be glad comments like that are unacceptable today and move on.

  • @famospilot
    @famospilot 15 років тому +5

    In the early 1960s I flew the Eastern Air Lines Shuttle between New York and Boston and Washington. A person could walk to the gate 1 minute before departure and get on the flight. If the plane was full, another plane was brought to the gate, even for a single passenger. Tickets were bought on board.
    Now you must arrive at the security or baggage check in a hour before departure. From one minute to one hour; now that's progress!

  • @SuperLittleman101
    @SuperLittleman101 5 років тому +7

    Did I see pilots loading freight mail on to the plane.

  • @safetychoice
    @safetychoice 14 років тому +19

    No metal detectors, no TSA, they didn't even make you take your shoes off. Ah, those were the days!

  • @chrisnewman7281
    @chrisnewman7281 5 років тому +7

    Not fast enough to get jet lag, not high enough to miss the weather. You won’t miss a thing!

  • @albear972
    @albear972 5 років тому +10

    9:22 The chubby 1933 guy was freight! 😂🤣😂🤣

    • @Bill23799
      @Bill23799 5 років тому +1

      Haha I resemble that remark.

  • @AlMeans
    @AlMeans 8 років тому +4

    "our genial fat friend ... can't help but share his cigars" HAHA! Beautiful!

  • @redsoil5
    @redsoil5 15 років тому +7

    It is amazing how things changed.Back then people are very modest,they fly in suit and are very formal,now I can see people travel in tank tops,shorts & flip flops.

  • @lincolnpaul1814
    @lincolnpaul1814 5 років тому +10

    David Bry, why tell me this in my eighty years I’ve flown over the Atlantic at least 60 times and many times in America and Europe over land and water. My first flight was at 15 years old from Baltimore to Pittsburgh in 1954. It took one and one half hour. They served quail for lunch. My last flight was at 79 years old from Munich to Stockholm in 2018. It took two and one half hours. They served a cheese sandwich for lunch.

    • @astrodiver1
      @astrodiver1 5 років тому +1

      You got a sandwich?

    • @bohemoth1
      @bohemoth1 5 років тому

      Oh shit you're kidding?

    • @scottr3484
      @scottr3484 5 років тому

      You can keep the Quail I will take the cheese sandwich

  • @MrDougster37
    @MrDougster37 5 років тому +7

    2:10 - Man that is one fly vehicle! I could definitely roll in that.

  • @pigeonlove
    @pigeonlove 11 років тому +7

    3.58 where..'lures you to strange adventure'..camera pans a flock of sheep?

    • @JDAbelRN
      @JDAbelRN 6 років тому +1

      pitchfork strange adventure is the weird old Mexican guy watching the sheep.

  • @lasuvidaboy
    @lasuvidaboy 14 років тому +4

    All planes were 1st class in those days. Only the well-off could afford to fly up until the 1970s. BTW, Pan American Airways was an international airline in those days. American and United were offering all 1st class domestic servive. Pan American did'nt get into the US domestic market until the 1960s and 70s and by then it was to late. United took over many of Pan Ams original International routes when it went out of business.

  • @randycondran3541
    @randycondran3541 9 років тому +35

    If that great new insulation was so great, why'd the fat guy have to yell in that man's ear to ask if he wanted a cigar?

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому +4

      Yes, exactly. This film has some serious lies going on about sleeping and quiet. Those planes were noisy as hell.

    • @firosfiros4429
      @firosfiros4429 5 років тому

      No smoking

    • @miata1492
      @miata1492 3 роки тому

      Ahhhh . . . perhaps that man was partially deaf?

  • @martinmartin5904
    @martinmartin5904 7 років тому +5

    3:50 wow , le plus haut édifice de Montréal des années '30 : le building de la banque Royale qui fut aussi le plus haut édifice de l'empire britanique de 1928 .

    •  4 роки тому

      Hid

  • @corner559
    @corner559 9 років тому +12

    Wow, how times have changed.

  • @scottsmith7687
    @scottsmith7687 5 років тому +5

    1933 - in the middle of the great depression. I guess some people had money...

    • @DaveGIS123
      @DaveGIS123 5 років тому

      ...except for the out-of-work actors who played the passengers.

    • @hankaustin7091
      @hankaustin7091 5 років тому

      Correct.. not EVERYone was poor during the depression. State and Federal workers all had steady jobs, just to name a few.

  • @Camnun
    @Camnun 12 років тому +14

    I almost fell of the chair laughing at 15:00 ... "Our genial fat friend with a grin that wont wear off... is NOT ONLY SMOKING CIGARS in such a small plane but encouraging the others to do the same at his own expenses !! LOL...

  • @machia0705
    @machia0705 5 років тому +7

    There was no NY Airport at this time.
    Newark Airport was the only NY area airport located in northeast NJ.
    It was the first commercial airport in the world built by the City of Newark.

    • @RatPfink66
      @RatPfink66 5 років тому +1

      NYC had North Beach, but it was strictly a seaplane station. At the end of the '30s, Mayor LaGuardia - who had long resented Newark getting NYC's passenger air traffic - built an airport nearby in preparation for the World's Fair. They named it after him.

    • @machia0705
      @machia0705 5 років тому +2

      RatPfink66
      Thanks.
      Great info.
      Yes, LaGuardia didn’t want to land in Newark. He said; “we need to build a NY airport....” And he did !
      He was quite a character.

  • @LawyerCalhoun1
    @LawyerCalhoun1 6 років тому +5

    Note these people all lost a business day flying from Chicago to New York. Their better alternative was to take an overnight express train, such as the 20th Century and arrive the next morning.

    • @stevek8829
      @stevek8829 5 років тому

      Dumb Ass! Look up Amtrack Chi 6:40 pm to NY 4:56 pm NEXT DAY! That's in 2019.

    • @gcrav
      @gcrav 5 років тому

      @@stevek8829 In the 1940s the Twentieth Century ran a 15 1/2 hour overnight schedule. Then the ICC forced trains to slow down in the 1950s and good long distance service was never a priority for Amtrak.

  • @MrBandity
    @MrBandity 12 років тому +5

    Warmed my heart to see classic American Airways aviation footage. Ah the good old days when management cared for the success of their flagship company! Now it is all about bonuses for them and busting unions. So sad!

    • @r.t.h.k.o
      @r.t.h.k.o 4 роки тому +1

      Very true, although they were busting unions back then too

  • @robertansley6331
    @robertansley6331 4 роки тому +2

    _The stewardess is also a registered nurse_ ... *that* is one tough job requirement!

  • @oldschoolgreentube
    @oldschoolgreentube 5 років тому +15

    Curtiss Condor.
    Maximum speed: 190 mph (306 km/h; 165 kn)
    Cruise speed: 167 mph (269 km/h; 145 kn)
    Range: 716 mi (622 nmi; 1,152 km)
    Service ceiling: 23,000 ft (7,000 m)

    • @Bill23799
      @Bill23799 5 років тому +3

      Thanks, I was wondering who made that Bi Plane air liner.

    • @emwavemhz
      @emwavemhz 5 років тому +2

      About the same specs as a Cessna 210.

    • @oldschoolgreentube
      @oldschoolgreentube 5 років тому

      Bet the 210 gets better mileage.
      @@emwavemhz

    • @emwavemhz
      @emwavemhz 5 років тому +8

      FooBar Maximus Many of us here have/had their careers in Aviation as I am retired from a career in Aviation and enjoy discussing such things as vintage aircraft with other like minded individuals and if you don’t like that then you simply don’t belong here! Go find another thread where you can enjoy slamming others!

    • @MikeGreenwood51
      @MikeGreenwood51 5 років тому +1

      TY. Oldschoolgreentube

  • @nadinecrupi5481
    @nadinecrupi5481 5 років тому +4

    WOW...this is amazing how far the air industry has come. Loved the cities back then..life was so simple! Awesome!

  • @granthart7120
    @granthart7120 7 років тому +27

    One sentence that offends cannot remove all the historical value that this film has. Even that bad word teaches us our own history. Errett Loban Cord was a great man.

    • @romie1967
      @romie1967 5 років тому +5

      Agreed. But you've got to call it ALL out

    • @fairfaxcat1312
      @fairfaxcat1312 5 років тому +14

      Lamentable as the use of that racial expression may be I am, nonetheless, thrilled that no other offensive language exists anywhere on the internet.

    • @dshmechanic
      @dshmechanic 5 років тому

      @@fairfaxcat1312 Loved your comment! BTW, your username...does it refer to Fairfax, VA by chance? I was born there in 1972. One month later my folks moved north to central PA...just before Hurricane Agnes and the great '72 flood!

    • @montsemajanmartinez9824
      @montsemajanmartinez9824 5 років тому

      Good eye.
      I was going to make a note, but you beat me to it!

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 5 років тому +1

      @@dshmechanic giving out too much personal info, be careful eh!

  • @zelphx
    @zelphx 5 років тому +6

    "Brownsville, Gateway to Mexico City"! Do they still identify as such?

    • @r.t.h.k.o
      @r.t.h.k.o 4 роки тому

      Yeah they do you racist piece of shit

    • @aerotimesofficial
      @aerotimesofficial 4 роки тому

      no they don't. In those days Pan American Airways made Brownsville airport its base for all flights going south to Mexico because the route was Brownsville-Tampico-Tuxpan-Mexico City this means flying most of the route at sea level due to the dense mountainous terrain to the west.

  • @alanschur
    @alanschur 8 років тому +9

    I was waiting to see superman!

  • @Springbok295
    @Springbok295 5 років тому +5

    Wow, the year my mother was born. She'd go on to be an Eastern FA herself.

    • @Springbok295
      @Springbok295 5 років тому +2

      FooBar Maximus yes I know what they were called then. Don’t question my knowledge of history pal.

    • @chriskelleher349
      @chriskelleher349 4 роки тому

      👍👍

  • @JTrost1234
    @JTrost1234 6 років тому +17

    People spoke and dressed so well back then. I love the narrator's voice.

  • @itsmegp46
    @itsmegp46 11 років тому +5

    I'd take today's flying over anything from that era any day.

  • @Pithecanthropus2483
    @Pithecanthropus2483 6 років тому +4

    "It is a dee-poh. An air dee-poh!", said Robot Boy.

    • @richterkleiber
      @richterkleiber 4 роки тому +1

      That was quite the regional accent too! I wonder where they were from. Either way, hilarious.

  • @altfactor
    @altfactor 10 років тому +4

    "From Boston to Los Angeles in little more than a day!".
    Today, that flight takes just about five and a half hours.

    • @merrillyeager6612
      @merrillyeager6612 8 років тому +3

      +altfactor IF there are no delays .... Good Luck!

  • @nshvlcat
    @nshvlcat 5 років тому +4

    Great movie but today, I fly Amtrak!

  • @robertcushman7002
    @robertcushman7002 3 роки тому +1

    my parents worked for Pan Am In the 50s/ 60s In Miami. I grew up with the airlines, my father was a pilot, my mom worked flight watch. this is when flying was an adventure, unlike today 😕, flip flops and t shirts! people have no class, or pride! point a to b, just a city bus In the air....
    I don't fly anymore!

  • @paulcheek5711
    @paulcheek5711 5 років тому +1

    but where are the designated gay flghts....

  • @tomw377
    @tomw377 5 років тому +3

    The T-32 Condor is one of my favorite interwar aircraft. The BT-32 was a military bomber version that saw service with the Nationalist Chinese Air Force prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. Look at 7:15 thru 7:23 and you can see how big swinging cargo bay doors made it easy to convert into a bomber.

  • @funtimeggg
    @funtimeggg Рік тому +1

    Who is watching in 2023? 🙋‍♂️

  • @cant144
    @cant144 5 років тому +4

    Only 30 years after the Wright Brothers! Yes, it was called American Airways, then; it became American Airlines in 1934. Airfare in 1933 between Chicago and NYC was $33.00. (Average per capita income in the Great Depression year of 1933 was $474.00.)

    • @blabla9845
      @blabla9845 5 років тому

      That's about $3,800 into today's dollars!

    • @Sparky5999
      @Sparky5999 5 років тому

      Hmmm my on line calculator shows
      $650 present day dollars for $33 in 1933

    • @cant144
      @cant144 5 років тому

      That sounds about right -- 20x inflationary boost in 85 years. In that Depression year of 1934, a new Studebaker truck cost $625.00. A new house could be bought for $6,000.00. Monthly rent of a house was $25.00. It is difficult, though, to come up with truly comparable figures. For instance, a ticket to the 1915 NYC preview of the movie Birth of a Nation was $5.00. Allowing for inflation again, this comes out to more than an eye-watering $100.00 in 2019.

  • @LarryButler-kp3se
    @LarryButler-kp3se 6 місяців тому +1

    Long ago, I changed planes for the short Delta hop to Charleston, SC. There was a two hour layover, but I went to the ramp anyway. About 45 minutes before boarding, a Delta clerk came and set up the check in station. I went up and was first in line. She told me the long time before boarding. "Whoa! That's not what the sign says over there.", I said pointing to the sign. "DELTA IS READY WHEN YOU ARE", it said. "I'm ready. Let's go!", getting a chuckle from her. "I'm ready, too!", the little old lady from James Island piped in. Our little joke got us a boost from the cheap seats to First Class.....

  • @paulazemeckis7835
    @paulazemeckis7835 3 роки тому +1

    Love the gangsta mobiles! Just need a Tommy gun to complete the vid!

  • @scottmoseley5122
    @scottmoseley5122 7 років тому +5

    Im goin to Memphis , Memphis , Memphis Tennessee....
    and @ 9:24 its John Candy Planes Trains and Automobiles

    • @mtlicq
      @mtlicq 5 років тому

      LOL - and going back East !

  • @fredricunderhill204
    @fredricunderhill204 5 років тому +4

    Refuel with people on board... not any more.

    • @DaveGIS123
      @DaveGIS123 5 років тому +2

      Refuel with people on board SMOKING!... not any more.

  • @RADIUMGLASS
    @RADIUMGLASS 5 років тому +8

    Clean people, normal weight. We're advancing in technology but going in reverse hygienically.

    • @vector8633
      @vector8633 5 років тому

      No wonder they were "normal weight". It was the middle of the Great Depression!

    • @MikeGreenwood51
      @MikeGreenwood51 5 років тому

      Vector8633,
      It wasn't that great really.

  • @bajajoes1
    @bajajoes1 12 років тому +3

    At 12:47 the Map looks like they were flying into Mexico, maybe Monterrey.
    It's amazing the contrast between flying then and now.
    Then it was pleasurable and now its akin to preparing to go to jail!

    • @lesizmor9079
      @lesizmor9079 5 років тому

      Baja J --- I'm guessing you've never flown on planes like that. They're loud as hell and fly at lower altitudes where turbulence is very prevalent. Not pleasurable at all. Just expedient for the business traveler.

  • @RatPfink66
    @RatPfink66 5 років тому +1

    Never mind airlines. Most Americans in 1933 couldn't afford to travel *at all* - even by car or bus. A trip on a Pullman sleeper train was something one could consider oneself very lucky to experience.
    And in 1933, too, came the first act of airline sabotage. A nitroglycerin bomb blew up a United Boeing 247 in flight. Only 7 lives were lost - all those aboard - but the case was never solved.

  • @blissy1
    @blissy1 4 роки тому +1

    Memphis Tennessee @ 4.42 loading cotton , narrators comment not PC in today’s world!!

  • @jetnipatteeravithayapinyo2468
    @jetnipatteeravithayapinyo2468 4 роки тому +1

    @12:40 looks like the copilot’s dozing off

  • @safetychoice
    @safetychoice 13 років тому +2

    It's amazing to think that this movie was made during the depth of the depression. My other comment (and I was alive at the time) is that if you had tried to sic the TSA on these people there would have been a fist fight, and if they had tried to touch the women, oh my!

  • @k3lit0
    @k3lit0 9 років тому +6

    OK??? On the radio when we answer in the affirmative we use "roger," understand??

  • @naturegirl92584
    @naturegirl92584 15 років тому +1

    From 00:35 onward, did no-one notice the passersby wearing the star of David, which labels them as "Jude?" I wonder if that shot was taken in Germany or Poland.
    It is so sad to think of what happened to those people.

  • @fairfaxcat1312
    @fairfaxcat1312 5 років тому +10

    A well organized deluxe travel service far in advance of anything you have ever known.

  • @kanishkbhardwaj7824
    @kanishkbhardwaj7824 4 роки тому +1

    Someone do a proper documentary on the washroom of this plane. It seems much better that the hell holes we’re forced to use on the modern Airbuses and Boeings..

  • @james5460
    @james5460 9 років тому +13

    The most interesting thing to me was the route map at 12:47. Notice how the transcontinental routes were over New Mexico and Arizona. Denver was just a regional hub. I presume this was because the planes of the time had difficulty flying over the Rockies.

    • @dfirth224
      @dfirth224 8 років тому +1

      +James That and government regulation. Airlines then were subsidized by the Post Office for carrying air mail.

  • @stevenjoelBx
    @stevenjoelBx 5 років тому +3

    I love how the narrator is the voice for everyone

  • @vanessadillon3421
    @vanessadillon3421 3 роки тому +1

    [N real life the noise and "vibration was so
    Extreme that most
    People were barffing
    Rather than eating !

  • @meowmeow-cr5sn
    @meowmeow-cr5sn 5 років тому +3

    Forrest Gump knows it's an air depot

  • @Pithecanthropus2483
    @Pithecanthropus2483 6 років тому +5

    Let's go places and do things!