Book TV After Words: John Updike

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 січ 2009
  • John Updike was interviewed about his life and work. Among the topics the author addressed were the Rabbit series, contributions to The New Yorker, his father, and religion. Mr. Updike responded to telephone calls, faxes, and electronic mail from viewers.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @valpergalit
    @valpergalit 5 місяців тому +2

    Glad to hear him mention A Month of Sundays at the end. That novel is one of his best, yet unjustly overlooked in his oeuvre.

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 6 років тому +9

    I loved the Rabbit series. Wonderful insight on American life and beautifully written.

  • @spd13062
    @spd13062 15 років тому +9

    Such a great writer, I was upset to hear of his passing. When you read "The Early Stories" you get a real sense of old fashioned Americana, which we are rapidly losing. The few comments here attest to this. Who had a more passionate view of the act of writing itself?
    RIP to a wonderful human being.

  • @shabirmagami146
    @shabirmagami146 23 дні тому

    thank you for this ... enlightening 💌💌

  • @Superfuntimejazz
    @Superfuntimejazz 3 роки тому +2

    when I become the world's greatest writer I will always remember to never, never, never, never, never, ever, never take phone questions.

  • @pawsoned
    @pawsoned 13 років тому +1

    I really enjoyed the talk and would certainly watch another hour and a half. Thanks for uploading this and I regret that the other half is missing

  • @ShalomFreedman
    @ShalomFreedman 12 років тому +4

    What a considerate intelligent and modest person considering the fact that he is the greatest American Man-of- Letters of the second half of the twentieth century.
    He's missed.

  • @extropian
    @extropian 15 років тому +2

    He also wrote some of the best short stories in the history of the English language.

  • @jeffreyc.mcandrew8911
    @jeffreyc.mcandrew8911 7 років тому +2

    The book "Terrorist" sound fascinating. The character mix sounds extremely compelling.

  • @nathanadams431
    @nathanadams431 11 років тому +1

    THANKS!

  • @PoetlaureateNFDL
    @PoetlaureateNFDL 15 років тому +2

    Very nice in depth view of a great author, perhaps America's greatest ever writer :)

  • @transitny
    @transitny 13 років тому +3

    The first novel I read of his was Rabbit is Rich. I was a freshman in college. The first few pages, you could feel the decay of the U. S. in the late 70s. I could literally feel the paint peeling off of everything. All of the settings and characters literally stunk.
    The only problem I've had with his fiction is that his sentences tend to be dragged out because they are crammed with detail.

  • @doc2146
    @doc2146 3 роки тому +2

    I would tell friends that I knew exactly how I wanted to go out....playing full court pickup basketball...getting out on a fast break....receiving the pass...laying it in....and fade to black. The only problem being that I want to be 85 when it happens:-) Imagine my surprise as I finished the Rabbitt series (which began with him stopping to shoot hoops with some kids) and that is how Rabbitt went out.

    • @firstal3799
      @firstal3799 Рік тому

      You may change it to a golf course setting

  • @jeffrey3498
    @jeffrey3498 2 місяці тому

    When Mr. Updike thinks and talks about Rabbit he can't help smiling, like John has a secret. Maybe John is more like Rabbit than he would ever let on. 😃👍

    • @exoxy
      @exoxy Місяць тому +1

      Agree, that cheeky grin. John and Rabbit and the American male

    • @jeffrey3498
      @jeffrey3498 Місяць тому

      @@exoxy Yes sir. 😎👍

  • @jeffrey3498
    @jeffrey3498 2 місяці тому

    I can't help thinking that John's mom was instilling in John the seeds to becoming a writer, not so much for herself.

  • @rhwinner
    @rhwinner Рік тому +1

    Updike was the first important author I read, quite by chance, finding Rabbit run in my JHS library. It may be responsible for my subsequent life of reading 'important' books and shunning the more popular fiction of the day.

  • @SamuelDaram
    @SamuelDaram 14 років тому

    Could someone upload Tom Wolfe's appearance on this show? Thanks.

  • @michaeldoyle6702
    @michaeldoyle6702 10 років тому +4

    Updike's first comments are bittersweet although the interviewer
    does not pick it up (see 3:37) An important comment and the
    book tv interviewer has no idea. A shame. Updike was always thinking
    about his own death and the interviewer ought to have pursued it.

    • @jeffreyc.mcandrew8911
      @jeffreyc.mcandrew8911 7 років тому +2

      The Charlie Rose interviews in 95 and 96 are better because he sees opportunities when they come up and pounces on them.

    • @edwardgeer3974
      @edwardgeer3974 5 років тому

      GaryPeterso

    • @user-wt3li6ks6o
      @user-wt3li6ks6o 5 років тому

      Michael Doyle How do you know Updike was always preoccupied with his own impending death. Are there any proofs?

  • @ryanke07
    @ryanke07 12 років тому

    For sound: switch the video to 240p.

  • @jeffrey3498
    @jeffrey3498 2 місяці тому

    Something was brewing in Brewer 🤣

  • @SamuelDaram
    @SamuelDaram 13 років тому

    What happened to the sound?

  • @richardpniewski4048
    @richardpniewski4048 8 років тому +3

    Every time I hear his voice - that cultured James Mason speech - I think about his graphic sex scenes and get a weird disconnect hearing his voice speaking some of the passages in, say, Rabbit Redux.

    • @richardpniewski4048
      @richardpniewski4048 3 роки тому

      I just now found out that my comment had been linked to a rarely used email and not my usual go-to one. Thanks for your reply and I will look into the society. Btw, I liked "Couples," actually , better than at least one of the "Rabbit" novels, and, although I know it's been regarded somewhat negatively, I rather enjoyed "Villages," uneven as it was.

  • @Forehead2Brick
    @Forehead2Brick 13 років тому

    SOMEONE. ANYONE. WHY ISN'T THERE SOUND?
    HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP.

  • @MrLolita33
    @MrLolita33 14 років тому +1

    @MustachioEdd
    Fiction is subjective. Although I have admiration for Bellow also, Updike is better than all four put together.

  • @user-rz6bc2cl3c
    @user-rz6bc2cl3c Місяць тому

    @ adam carroll, alas! you better believe it! He would probably feel we were living out pure 'fantasy'. (madness)

  • @sandramiley4527
    @sandramiley4527 2 роки тому

    How are you doing today

  • @anuradhainamdar8967
    @anuradhainamdar8967 2 роки тому

    After I have heard Professor Philip Roth's opinions on John Updike I get a better idea about Updike.

  • @iamautobody
    @iamautobody 12 років тому

    John Updike: Read his words and his lips ....? No sound.

  • @rangetpc
    @rangetpc 2 роки тому +1

    This would be a democrat /liberal view on life that was reasonable .
    Now unfortunately he would be considered a righty & conservative.
    That's how you know politics are going too far 😶

    • @kreek22
      @kreek22 8 місяців тому

      Politics went too far left in 1861.

  • @Forehead2Brick
    @Forehead2Brick 13 років тому

    HEEEEEEEELP. THERE'S NO SOOOOOOUUUUUND.
    SOMEONE, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, HEEEEEEELP.

  • @junjinho1
    @junjinho1 15 років тому

    his lengthy eyebrows grow to an unusual length, exceeding the norm. maybe it is an emblem, uniquely belonging to the wise, haha

  • @wiffleone
    @wiffleone 15 років тому

    how about mark twain? hemingway said he was the best. stephen king. nathaniel hawthorne. poe. there have been many great american writers. krakaur is one of the best ever--even tho he writes nonfiction.

    • @kreek22
      @kreek22 8 місяців тому

      Emerson and Dickinson, then their nemeses Melville, Twain, Faulkner. These are the best American writers.

  • @brainsareus
    @brainsareus 4 роки тому

    He was politically naive as all hell; no wonder, [Gore] Vidal could not take him...

  • @mrhuther
    @mrhuther 15 років тому +1

    With some exceptions (e.g., the Rabbit novels), I've never understood the adulation heaped on Updike. 99% of what he wrote is either pulp fiction or emotionally sterile pastiches of Colette and Hemingway.

    • @reinarforeman6518
      @reinarforeman6518 3 роки тому

      What's wrong with pulp fiction? Lovecraft wrote pulp fiction and he's still an important writer.

    • @kreek22
      @kreek22 8 місяців тому

      You're mistaken, his short stories are quite good. And most of Hemingway is a pastiche of Hemingway.

    • @thetributary8089
      @thetributary8089 6 місяців тому

      Updikes short stories and criticism are legendary (beyond the rabbit novels). Also, pulp has a place with important authors. Graham Greene, for example

  • @adamcarroll1975
    @adamcarroll1975 5 років тому +7

    I bet he would hate the current state of America, with Trump and his cronies... ☹️

    • @kreek22
      @kreek22 8 місяців тому

      He spent his life enjoying the decadence and decline of the nation and of its encompassing civilization--like a typical late stage WASP. The prospect of re-invigoration presented by Trump would have frightened his frail post-faith soul.

  • @tnguyen318
    @tnguyen318 13 років тому

    The only books I read are the Almanac and the Encyclopedia. Other than that, besides the Dictionary, America's writing is so fake its not even funny. It doesn't make much sense whatsoever.