Huffpost Journalist: Nuclear energy to help contribute to stable, carbon-free power source | ANC
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- Headstart: Karen Davila talks to Huffpost journalist Alexander Kaufman as he travels Europe and Asia to report extensively on the resurgence of nuclear power.
Join ANC PRESTIGE to get access to perks:
/ @ancalerts
For more ANC Interviews, click the link below:
• ANC Interviews
For more Headstart videos, click the link below:
• Headstart
For more ANC Highlights videos, click the link below:
• ANC Highlights
Subscribe to the ANC UA-cam channel!
/ ancalerts
Visit our website at news.abs-cbn.com/anc
Facebook: / ancalerts
Twitter: / ancalerts
#ANCNews
#ANCHighlights
#Headstart
I am for the Nuclear Reactor as a source of alternative energy, we just need to have the right knowledgeable personnel to operate the site.
I agree to nuclear energy in the Philippines and the best place to have this is Ilocos Norte or Davao City.
Use THORUIM nuclear waste can not be coverted to weapons and not radioactive like U-238 or U-235 waste to Atomic Bomb.
I agree...im not scientist but the Bataan nuclear plant is one of the ans. to our energy problem that our energy department should consider.🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉.
@@felipecostillas3798 by the way what is the meaning of NSC in Ukraine?
The Admin should pursue this ASAP, we are in a looming power crisis, Malampaya gas field will be depleting in several years. The goal, 1 nuclear powerplant per region. This will immediately solve our energy crisis. Of course, while mixing renewable energy sources such as geothermal, solar and wind.
Nuclear energy boost productivity and economy ❤
Given all the public information we have about nuclear energy and nuclear waste, we have no excuse but to wholeheartedly back this initiative 100%
Kailan kaya mabubuksan yan sana mabuksan na ang BNPP habang buhay pa ako.
Manufacturing Solar Panels and Wind Turbine creates Carbon Footprint.
For national security reason, this may be the viable option. Better than relying on imported energy sources like oil and coal.
Anc is deleting comments, Reactors, which rely on technologies developed over 40 years ago. They are expensive to build and even more so to maintain across their lifecycle. Costs do not just concern the initial construction, but also the ongoing price of fuels, operational costs, and engineering fees. And then there’s the problem of the nuclear waste.
Nuclear energy ‘does not reduce the price of electricity’
Nuclear power plants can be attractive for their owners but not necessarily for consumers as they hardly ever determine the price of electricity on the energy exchange.
If you replace the capacity of a nuclear power plant for example by the capacity of a coal power plant, the price will not change because it is still the natural gas power plant being the most expensive one and deciding about the price.
This is a question of who gains and who pays. When somebody says that the nuclear power plant is cheap, it is for the owner but not necessarily for the consumer.
I agree, let's build those nuclear power plants now
madami positive effect sa bansa pagkakaroon ng nuclear, isipin nyo lahat ng sektor na gumagamit ng kuryente mapapababa ang costing nyan. Lalo na ngayon nag sswitch tayo sa EV at makabahagi tayo kahit ilan percent sa manufacturing na mawawala sa china. Mabuhay muli ang mga nawalang industry gaya ng steel industry, madami naman raw materials dito sa pinas, kaso walang nag pprocess.
Nuclear is much cheaper than dirty carbon, that we need the most in the Philippines for now, hopefully we can build a nuclear power plant to lessen the electricity expenses
Nuclear Power is the best source of energy for the Philippines. Its a zero carbon power plant.
D2 sa UAE daming nuclear power plant kaya mura ang kuryente
They JUST built the very expensive and innovative engineering NSC in Ukraine 😮😮😮. Why why Karen
That's right 👍👍👍👍👍
Balik2x Wala nalang nangyari
I don't care what fuel is use, as long as the electricity bill decreased that's all I care.😁
Ignorance is no excuse in case of accident
nuclear energy lang pag-asa ng bayan umasenso.....daming negosyo papasok trabaho magagawa
Puro hearing ba naman ang intindihin eh, itong mga ganitong importanteng bagay, ayaw manlang isulong.
yeah carbon free, hello radioactive nuclear wastes. if you think plastic is bad, radioactive nuclear wastes are way2x worst. currently, there's a lot of censorship & misdirection about the true nature of radioactive nuclear wastes. that censorship & misdirection weren't so pervasive way back when journalists had integrity & seriously did their job. here's an example of journalism getting to the bottom of the nuclear wastes topic. >>> ua-cam.com/video/McrytYdId5M/v-deo.html
dude, nuclear waste is no longer dumped into the ocean. It was banned in 1993.
Boss Karen 😮😅 just remember Chernobyl and Fukushima
do your research dear. you're just blatantly making assumptions. South Korea has 26 nuclear reactor which has the same tech/identical as what was built in Bataan, and no incident of such.
@@user-wg9ki7rn9e you're the one that needs to do more research mate !! Why is it Fukushima now has a 30 miles radius ghost town and the NSC in Ukraine is needed for a very expensive innovative engineering technology ??? We filipinos don't have that kind of money and patience
Koreans and Filipino have different point of views mate 🥺
Why build A power plants that are expensive and with waste problems? Waste that must be stored for many thousands of years.
The Philippines has so much geothermal heat that it is free energy and requires little security and maintenance. Look at Iceland which has similar geosubsoil to the Philippines. They have free heating of houses as well as hot water and electricity.
Why is the Philippines not looking at the long term solution?
The Philippines already rank as the 3rd largest power producer of geothermal energy in the world, so I think they know about the potential already.
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk Then domore off that.
@@AndersGetherSoerensen Why don't you? I'm not from the Philippines. I debunk people like you who talk smack about nuclear energy.
@@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk It is your own choice. I just think that the advocates of A-power plants ignore the problems associated with their operation. Especially the trash. And there is no waste with geothermal heat that produces electricity. And it can be produced on virtually all the major islands in the Philippines and with cables to the smaller islands. A-power plants are more expensive and take at least 10 years to build. At that time, many geothermal plants could be built for less money and without waste.
@@AndersGetherSoerensen Because it is hard to locate those Geothermal hot spots. In addition, it will only be available in some places but not the entire country especially in big Cities. Take note, that those plants are also expensive and most of the time the electricity rate is twice that of Coal.