This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17). The silence was broken, not just by a prophet, but by God Himself, announcing the arrival of His Son, the Savior of the world.
The 400 years between Malachi and Matthew were not silent at all. God was actively working through history, preparing the world for the coming of His Son. Through the rise and fall of empires, the preservation of Jewish faith, and the arrival of John the Baptist, everything pointed to the moment when Jesus would enter the scene.
So, was God silent, or were people simply not paying attention? And today, are we listening to God’s voice, or are we missing what He’s doing because we expect Him to speak in the way we want?
A great question! When people refer to the "94 gospels" supposedly left out of the Bible, they are often referring to apocryphal or non-canonical writings, which were excluded from the Bible for various reasons. The 27 books of the New Testament, including the four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), were chosen because they were widely recognized by the early church as inspired and trustworthy. They align with the core teachings of Jesus and the apostles, as well as Old Testament prophecy. Many of these other so-called "gospels" were written much later and contained ideas that conflicted with the established Christian faith. Some were influenced by Gnostic beliefs, which viewed the material world as evil and contradicted foundational Christian doctrines. Early church leaders studied these texts but determined that they did not reflect the truth of Jesus Christ as taught by His apostles. So, the canon wasn’t decided on a whim-it was a careful process guided by historical accuracy, consistency with Jesus' teachings, and spiritual discernment. The "94 gospels" may sound intriguing, but they don’t hold the same credibility or authority as the books included in the Bible today. It’s always good to dive deep into history and explore the reasons behind these decisions. If you're interested in learning more, I'd recommend studying early church history and the process of canonization to understand why certain books were chosen and others were left out.
![What Happened Between the Old Testament and the New Testament? [ BT // 005 ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2_70RbtRO5w/mqdefault.jpg)
Halleluyaj❤
Praise be to God.
Oh Hallelujah!
Amen 🙏 😊
Hallelujah 🔥
Thank you God❤ For This plan
This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased” (Matthew 3:17). The silence was broken, not just by a prophet, but by God Himself, announcing the arrival of His Son, the Savior of the world.
Every event was preparing for the Messiah, our God is always working❤
The 400 years between Malachi and Matthew were not silent at all. God was actively working through history, preparing the world for the coming of His Son. Through the rise and fall of empires, the preservation of Jewish faith, and the arrival of John the Baptist, everything pointed to the moment when Jesus would enter the scene.
This is clearly explained than i expected ❤
Keep learning with us.
Since the beginning of time God has never stopped speaking to man
This period is often misunderstood, leading to strange conclusions and false beliefs.
We don’t hear Him the way we expect, because He’s working behind the scenes.
So, was God silent, or were people simply not paying attention? And today, are we listening to God’s voice, or are we missing what He’s doing because we expect Him to speak in the way we want?
400 What happened🤔
God was preparing the world for the messiah
The silence means God was absent, but in reality, He was carefully orchestrating His plan.
They think the silence means God was absent, but in reality, He was carefully orchestrating His plan.
94 gospels supposedly left out of Bible
A great question! When people refer to the "94 gospels" supposedly left out of the Bible, they are often referring to apocryphal or non-canonical writings, which were excluded from the Bible for various reasons. The 27 books of the New Testament, including the four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), were chosen because they were widely recognized by the early church as inspired and trustworthy. They align with the core teachings of Jesus and the apostles, as well as Old Testament prophecy.
Many of these other so-called "gospels" were written much later and contained ideas that conflicted with the established Christian faith. Some were influenced by Gnostic beliefs, which viewed the material world as evil and contradicted foundational Christian doctrines. Early church leaders studied these texts but determined that they did not reflect the truth of Jesus Christ as taught by His apostles.
So, the canon wasn’t decided on a whim-it was a careful process guided by historical accuracy, consistency with Jesus' teachings, and spiritual discernment. The "94 gospels" may sound intriguing, but they don’t hold the same credibility or authority as the books included in the Bible today.
It’s always good to dive deep into history and explore the reasons behind these decisions. If you're interested in learning more, I'd recommend studying early church history and the process of canonization to understand why certain books were chosen and others were left out.
🎉😂😢😮
@@davedanny9053 Share the joke 😅😅😅