Very beautiful, colorful nebulae, galaxies, star clusters, super nova remnants and other gorgeous celestial bodies so far away and deep in the cosmos... Ann.: Watch and enjoy my own self-made beautiful slideshow videos with themes focusing on the high mountains and unique cultures and old traditions of East and South Asia, with well-selected spectacular images and musics. Good entertainment.
+Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda …because the starry sky isn’t an image in "black and white"... The Universe is an immense painting Naif... …and God is The Painter and The Picture itself.
+Christian Pacini (Nabucodònosor Ⅱ), nice words. Yes, that's quite right. The starry sky is really an immense coulorful painting than just a b&w image. And God is so to spek the _"Painter"_ of all these countless beauties. But not the _"Picture"_ itself! Because He (or better *_"It"_*, because _He_ is absolutely neuter!) is the *Supreme Creator, Owner and Sustainer* _of_ and _beyond_ His all _creations_ and _creatures_, i.e. whole cosmos and everything! Otherwise it would be rather a _pantheistic_ view.
Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda What you say can also be right, but according to Christian faith, God is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omniscient. So, being Omnipresent, It's everywhere, It's in everything and therefore It's The Whole. Nothing exists outside of God. God creates Itself. This, at least according to the Christian faith... Thank you very much for the correction about "It": I have to be more careful when I use the translator... in fact, usually, also I use "It" to define God and not "He", although according to the Christian faith God should be masculine. In fact, Jesus Christ said: “Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.” (John 14, 9)
Hi, dear +Christian Pacini (Nabucodònosor Ⅱ) , Quite right what you say about the infinite attributes of God! But being omnipresent, i.e. being present everywhere and always doesn't mean that God is in relation to any or whole "place" and "time" in physical sense! Yes, in fact, He is everywhere, but at the same time He is also absolute beyond everything, completely independent from time and space/place! Because He is transcendent over all being! Not only beyond matter, but also beyond spirit and soul. However on the other hand, of course, He is to our cosmos, to our world, to ourself not far in any physical sense; on the contrary, He is even to ourself, to our soul closer than our mind and body! Although Almighty God is in literally absolutely INFINITE - ENDLESS and the seemingly boundless whole universe appears compared with that (if ever possible) not even as a subatomic particle; it would be equal to zero! His omnipresence is absolute, but exceeds and transcendence all - to us known and unknown - dimensions and He comprises everything, all being, whole universe plus the _"seven heavens"_ with His omnipotence, omniscience. And despite this absolute transcendence He intervenes and controls and rules all events, everything in the universe. He is the Ruler, the true "doer" of all being! And at second, if you use the personal pronoun _"He"_ for God, our Lord, then *it's not wrong in common use.* I've suggested to use _"It"_ only in that regard *if we take this designation literally and precisely due to God's neuter/asexuality.* Please read also this comment about my related profile image: plus.google.com/+JohaarjoshimanthGhaurinanda/posts?pid=6139607544009591602&oid=100793008030175569044 (Annotation: I also use Google translation machine as you and try to make it optimal by doing entries from two other languages and correct often mistranslated words and sentences; however, as you can see, it doesn't work perfect-flawless and is not easy!) _Thanks and with best regards! Merciful God bless you!.._
+Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda Ouch! It's really difficult to deal this theme so complex through a translator... Most likely, we say the same thing. Also I'm convinced that God, though permeating everything, remains independent from the whole. At the same time, I am convinced that He is equally the Whole. The representation of Father in the body of the son can be better understood if one compares the Father-son relationship with Macrocosm-microcosm. What prevents God, since He is the Almighty, to manifesting Himself also physically? What God wants, He does. Indeed, it is written: "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased." (Matthew 3, 17) The words "with whom I am well pleased" actually signify "he comprehend Me" , "he represents Me". How can the son comprehend in himself the Father? How can the microcosm comprehend in itself the Macrocosm? This is very difficult to understand and even harder to explain. In any case, also science says that is the son to comprehend the father and not vice versa, for reason of genetic inheritance. Maybe now I'm pushing a little too far, but in any case with my words I don't mean to deny what you say. My vision doesn't exclude automatically your own. Mine is only a discussion to try to understand better which is the true reality, but truly it's too hard to do all this through a translator... I hope I haven't disappointed you, I greeting you and I thank you for your blessing, that I reciprocate to you. God bless you too, Johaarjoshimanth.
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
A journey through the Universe...
God is definitely an artist, indeed: The Artist.
(To watch in HD 1080p and full screen.)
Naif...
Very beautiful, colorful nebulae, galaxies, star clusters, super nova remnants and other gorgeous celestial bodies so far away and deep in the cosmos...
Ann.: Watch and enjoy my own self-made beautiful slideshow videos with themes focusing on the high mountains and unique cultures and old traditions of East and South Asia, with well-selected spectacular images and musics. Good entertainment.
+Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda
…because the starry sky isn’t an image in "black and white"...
The Universe is an immense painting Naif...
…and God is The Painter and The Picture itself.
+Christian Pacini (Nabucodònosor Ⅱ), nice words. Yes, that's quite right. The starry sky is really an immense coulorful painting than just a b&w image. And God is so to spek the _"Painter"_ of all these countless beauties. But not the _"Picture"_ itself! Because He (or better *_"It"_*, because _He_ is absolutely neuter!) is the *Supreme Creator, Owner and Sustainer* _of_ and _beyond_ His all _creations_ and _creatures_, i.e. whole cosmos and everything! Otherwise it would be rather a _pantheistic_ view.
Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda What you say can also be right, but according to Christian faith, God is Omnipotent, Omnipresent, Omniscient.
So, being Omnipresent, It's everywhere, It's in everything and therefore It's The Whole.
Nothing exists outside of God.
God creates Itself.
This, at least according to the Christian faith...
Thank you very much for the correction about "It": I have to be more careful when I use the translator... in fact, usually, also I use "It" to define God and not "He", although according to the Christian faith God should be masculine.
In fact, Jesus Christ said:
“Whoever has seen me has seen the Father.”
(John 14, 9)
Hi, dear +Christian Pacini (Nabucodònosor Ⅱ) ,
Quite right what you say about the infinite attributes of God! But being omnipresent, i.e. being present everywhere and always doesn't mean that God is in relation to any or whole "place" and "time" in physical sense! Yes, in fact, He is everywhere, but at the same time He is also absolute beyond everything, completely independent from time and space/place! Because He is transcendent over all being! Not only beyond matter, but also beyond spirit and soul. However on the other hand, of course, He is to our cosmos, to our world, to ourself not far in any physical sense; on the contrary, He is even to ourself, to our soul closer than our mind and body! Although Almighty God is in literally absolutely INFINITE - ENDLESS and the seemingly boundless whole universe appears compared with that (if ever possible) not even as a subatomic particle; it would be equal to zero! His omnipresence is absolute, but exceeds and transcendence all - to us known and unknown - dimensions and He comprises everything, all being, whole universe plus the _"seven heavens"_ with His omnipotence, omniscience. And despite this absolute transcendence He intervenes and controls and rules all events, everything in the universe. He is the Ruler, the true "doer" of all being!
And at second, if you use the personal pronoun _"He"_ for God, our Lord, then *it's not wrong in common use.* I've suggested to use _"It"_ only in that regard *if we take this designation literally and precisely due to God's neuter/asexuality.* Please read also this comment about my related profile image:
plus.google.com/+JohaarjoshimanthGhaurinanda/posts?pid=6139607544009591602&oid=100793008030175569044
(Annotation: I also use Google translation machine as you and try to make it optimal by doing entries from two other languages and correct often mistranslated words and sentences; however, as you can see, it doesn't work perfect-flawless and is not easy!)
_Thanks and with best regards! Merciful God bless you!.._
+Johaarjoshimanth Ghaurinanda
Ouch! It's really difficult to deal this theme so complex through a translator...
Most likely, we say the same thing.
Also I'm convinced that God, though permeating everything, remains independent from the whole. At the same time, I am convinced that He is equally the Whole.
The representation of Father in the body of the son can be better understood if one compares the Father-son relationship with Macrocosm-microcosm.
What prevents God, since He is the Almighty, to manifesting Himself also physically?
What God wants, He does.
Indeed, it is written:
"This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased."
(Matthew 3, 17)
The words "with whom I am well pleased" actually signify "he comprehend Me" , "he represents Me".
How can the son comprehend in himself the Father?
How can the microcosm comprehend in itself the Macrocosm?
This is very difficult to understand and even harder to explain.
In any case, also science says that is the son to comprehend the father and not vice versa, for reason of genetic inheritance.
Maybe now I'm pushing a little too far, but in any case with my words I don't mean to deny what you say.
My vision doesn't exclude automatically your own.
Mine is only a discussion to try to understand better which is the true reality, but truly it's too hard to do all this through a translator...
I hope I haven't disappointed you, I greeting you and I thank you for your blessing, that I reciprocate to you.
God bless you too, Johaarjoshimanth.