Amazing acting skills demonstrated by Kulbhushan Kharbanda, First I thought that he might not suit this character but I was wrong, What an amazing actor.
Whatever your parents do is best for you. They are the best gift form Almighty. One only come to know about their importance when they are no more. Always love your parents the most.
If you pay attention to the get up of Kulbhushan Kharbanda then you will realise that it closely resembles with the portrait of Akbar including the face
Whatever a father say, whatever threats he gives and however angry he is, blood is blood,as seen in the episode!! Even the GREAT Akbar, ultimately, gave in to his love for his own son and didn't do or act anything against Salim, even though he had killed his best friend, Abul Fazal and was always disobeying his orders! This is called blind love, the love a father has for his sons and daughters,but, unfortunately, the scene is different when it is a question of the love of the sons and daughters for their own parents, because we always see and read about this or that children torturing and abusing their old parents for money, property and sometimes just because they don't want to take care of their own old parents!! Our great Indian culture!! Jai shree Ram!
Well this is not actual history. Let me give you an example Akbar had no wife named Jodha Bai she actually was the wife of his son Salim Aka Jahangir. This is a major mistake and there are a lot of mistakes like this.
The khayal had not been invented during Akbar's time. Drupad and Dhamar used to be sung then. Shyam Benegal ought to known better. Research about the period, in this regard it must be said, is sadly missing.
@@dearliar8506 You didnt even get education from whatsapp university. Jalaluddin Muhammad is his name, Akbar was a title, a reign title. Like that of Aurangzeb and Alamgir.
Akbar was not as good as written in history. He killed and beheaded the last Hindu king of Delhi Hemchandra and beheaded him. His head was hanged on the red fort. Akbar made Rajputs to surrender to him and married their daughters to get them under Islamic law. Typical Islam strategy. Lots of cruelty done by Akbar during early period of his invasion to India has been purposely removed from texts to show his secular face. In reality Hindus suffered in every Islamic invasion and rulers for hundreds of years. Young generation should know the truth about history and based on facts and not fiction of movies and TV.
Akbar was not a great democrat or even an ideal KING but he was certainly a better Indian monarch than any Hindu King who preceded or followed him.Ashoka may be an exception.
Akbar was just 14 that time and Bairam khan was the man who beheaded Hemu, Not Akbar, nothing was in Akbar's hands, he was totally under Bairam's control, according to some resources he even urged Bairam to not to kill hemu, bt Bairam did it.
I also agree that Jalaludin Akbar was only 13 years old during the Second Battle of Panipat, when he didn't want to behead Raja Hemuchandra because the Raja was pleading for forgiveness and the Emperor wanted to let him go and his General and Guardian Bairam Khan wanted to punish the Raja and he did just that
*Historical whitewashing of Akbar* “ _As directed by the word of God, we as far as it is within our power, remain busy in Jihad and owing to the kindness of the Supreme Lord, who is the promoter of our victories, we have succeeded in occupying a number of forts and towns belonging to the infidels and have established Islam there. With the help of our bloodthirsty sword we have razed the signs of infidelity from their minds and have destroyed temples in those places and also all over Hindustan._ ” - *Declaration of Jalal-ud-Din Mohammed Akbar, after the conquest of Chittor, 1568 (Fatehnama-e-Chittor)*
That was initial part of his reign where his every policy was based upon conquest .But when he started to consolidate Mughal empire,He became a different ruler.
If I am an emporer and find your dynasty revolting against mine, I would do the same thing that Akbar did. That's how things were back then, it was 16th century not 21st century. Different times, different morals..get a grip.
@@synthtastic74 Did he also destroy the shrines and religious sites of muslim rebels & install such plaques declaring destruction of infidelity there? Nopes. Clearly, it was a case of bigotry- difeerent religion, different morals. correct your grip. on history.
@@synthtastic74 if you are premising your argument upon the idea that with time, there is a linear growth in morals of religious tolerance, then obviously the rule of Islamic kings in India meant several steps backward, i.e a period of de-growth. more than 1500 years prior to Akbar (largely seen as the most liberal ruler among Mughals), there was already an example of much superior tolerance in Ashoka. Here's his command: “The king … honours all religious sects … with gifts and with honours of various kinds. But he does not value gifts or honour as much as the promotion of the essentials of all religious sects. The root of this is guarding one’s speech so that neither praising one’s own sect nor blaming others’ sects should occur on improper occasions; and it should be moderate on every occasion. And others’ sects should be honoured on every occasion. Acting thus, one both promotes one’s own sect and benefits others’ sects. Acting otherwise, one both harms one’s own sect and wrongs others’ sects. For whoever praises their own sect or blames another’s sect out of devotion to their own sect with a view to showing it in a good light, instead severely damages their own sect. Coming together is good, so that people should both hear and appreciate each other’s teaching.” (Major Rock Edict 12) learn the difference between history and hagiography. history writing, by rule, has to accommodate the unpleasant aspects of iconic figures. learn to accept history as it reveals itself to you, rather than staying in disingenuous denial. grow up.
Akbar's conquest of Chittor (1566-68) was led by Hindu generals. Even his favorute wife (who was a hindu rajput, erroneously called Jodha Bai) was present with him on this campaign. If it really was about establishing Islam, why would he give so much power and freedom to hindus and engage with them on a personal level? Compare it with Aurangzeb's attitudd and you will see who was motivated by power and religion and who was motivated by just power. Akbar was a power hungry ruler that made him do terrible things, like other power hungry rulers, but he was not a religious bigot. Akbar passed laws against slavery because he personally abhorred it. But the state of Mewar was long defiant, so it heurt it's ego and he ordered imprisonment and destruction. The battle for Chittor, the rivalry between Akbar and Pratap is legendary, but the notion that it was based on religion is totally baseless. If it was about religion, Akbar wouldn't have Hindu soldiers and generals fighting on his side, and Pratap's army wouldn't have Muslims.
Mughlo me ,, Sultan ul Azeem Hazrat AURANGZEB Alamgir Ale Rehma sarvsresth hai,, aur bharat ke Itihas ,, aur bhavishya me jitne bhi sasak hue, aur honge ,, sab me sarvshreshth hai
Dude. British did do archaeological research and compiled the history. But saying they wrote the history is childish, immature and ignorant. History is based on historical documents, archaeological evidence etc. Akbars history is based on various historical texts and chronically written during his and his sons time. Most prominent Akbarnama. It's TRUE that history is written by the victors and could be biased and also dependant on interpretations
@@AryanKumar-yu6ke भारतीय वामपंथी इतिहासकारों की नजर में अकबर महान था/है। बाकी तो यहां के तथाकथित वामपंथी इतिहासकारों ने चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य, समुद्रगुप्त, चन्द्रगुप्त विक्रमादित्य, स्कन्दगुप्त, हर्षवर्धन आदि को महान नही कहा और पाठ्यक्रमों में इन पर 2-4 पेज से अधिक नही लिखा जबकि ये सभी सम्राट महानता की सभी परिभाषाओ पर खरे उतरते हैं और अकबर से इनका स्थान ऊँचा है लेकिन आमजन इनके विषय में या तो बहुत कम जानता है या जानता ही नही ये दुर्भाग्य है की इन सम्राटों को हमनें इतिहास में सही स्थान नही दिया, क्या महान चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य की सम्पूर्ण भारत विजय इस योग्य न थी की उसे महान कहा जाए? या स्कन्दगुप्त की बर्बर हूणों पर विजय इतिहास में जगह पाने योग्य नही? या चंद्रगुप्त विक्रमादित्य की शकों पर विजय और उसके राज्य की महान समृद्धि जहां सभी पन्थ और धर्म अपने चर्मोत्कर्ष पर थे व्यापार वाणिज्य कला संस्कृति में इतिहास में सर्वश्रेष्ठ फिर भी उसे महान नही कहा गया ये कैसा न्याय? ये पक्षपातपूर्ण लेखन नही तो और क्या। रही बात अकबर के संदर्भ में तो हां हम ये कह सकते हैं की भारत के जितने भी मुस्लिम शासक हुए उनमें निश्चित ही गुण और कर्म की दृष्टि से अकबर सर्वश्रेष्ठ था।
Bharat ke putr Maharana Pratap the us 1500 sadi ke Akbar hatiyaara or anpad gvaar Kuta kamina tha kabi Maharana Pratap Singh ji ke samne to gya nhi jhund me jata tha.
@@muhammadasadkhan4425 abd usse guerrilla warfare kehta hai. Jiski wajah se Maharana Pratap ne mughlo ko unki aukat dikha di thi. Aur woh kabhi jungle mein nahi . Aravalli hills mein kai forts the wanha woh apna base banate the.
Pt. Nehru"s Discovery of India was very influenced by the western Political thoughts and western and Marxist Historians. He observed Indian history from THE Perspective his westernise education. He found similarities between Ashok and Akbar and called both of them Messiah of Secularism and Peace, also Akbar was described as A great King as well as he was termed as a Modern democratic leader who equated and termed all religins as one. He propagated DIN E ILAHI religion which was based on equality. Despite this Akbar was very rigid and tyrant ruler who fought most of the battles in the name of Islam and DIN. Calling him Secular and pious was abig mistake he imposed many restriction on the Females of the Royal harem and was very Orthodox in female matters.
He has written about Akbar what other historians had also written the same, there is everything about Akbar, historians has written everything, no one is perfect but he was beyond his time.
All the people I mention are all Indian Hindus from the Khumbar caste. It is very likely that Akbar was Bhagwan Ali Chitroda, Salim = Sa Lam a verbal recording of history known in Katha played countries. Shiekhbaba was Known in UK as Issac Newton and his real name was Bhagwan Jasan Chitroda he is my direct ancestor. 🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
Shehzada Saleem koi darpok NH tha ... Shehzada Saleem ek but bahadur r insaaf famous hai..adal e jhangeer k naam see ghalat histroy btarhe Hain ..mughl e Azam film m alag histry dikhai r is drame m alag ... Jhoti histroy... Saleem ki histroy ghalat btai bht. Saleem bachpan m sharabi tha phr use Jung k medaan m bhejdya that Jahan usne bahaduri r Fateh k jhande gaare.
😁😁Akber darpok tha vo kabhi maharana pratap ke samne nahi aaya itna darpok ki rajpooto se rajputon ko ladvaya na ki muglo ko kayar mugle sale dhoke se shasan kiya himmat hoti to aage se vaar karte
@@technicalboykrishna4963 aby jb Rajput ek dosre k dushman hon r ek dosre ko gaddi ki lalach m katne ko tyar hon to unse lar k time waste nh krte the Mughal ise siyasat kehte hain munne r jaiz hai ye siyasat se apne dushman ko khatam krna... Bina khoon bahae... R jb jb zarorat pari tb tb larai hui r Mughals ne fateh pai... Bad m marathas ne kabza kia Mughals ki Zameen pe jb Mughals kamzor hoe... Jhangeer k bad... Us se pehle ek inch Zameen b nh haare Mughals history parhle... Rajputs ne apni beti yaa dede k zameenein li r apna raaj bachaya hua tha tax pay krte the wo Mughals ko unke under hukumat krke. R is m koi buri bat nh thi ye Mughals ki zahanat thi unki siyasi kabiliyat thi jo unho ne Hindustan pe raaaj kia sbko sath Lee k chale. Insaaf k sath
Amazing acting skills demonstrated by Kulbhushan Kharbanda, First I thought that he might not suit this character but I was wrong, What an amazing actor.
Excellent acting by Kulbhushan Kharbanda as Akbar
सलीम ने सोचा पापा इनाम देंगे और अकेले कमरे मे लेजाकर 👋👋👋 दे पटा-पट।
जाते जाते 1 और धर गये बादशाह सलामत 🤣
😂
Lekin ya bat pta kaise chali??
@@disliketheclickbaits8858 ऐसे चरसी सलीम को क्या मिठाई खिलाता कोई साला बेवड़ा
@@disliketheclickbaits8858 कान वाली दिवारे
बाप आखिर बाप ही होता है
Master piece.. bharat ek khoj behtareen actors ki factory rahi.. salute to shyam benegal
Very good episode, if only real parents were half as good with their son as Akbar. He is caring about his sons like I have never seen mine do.
Whatever your parents do is best for you. They are the best gift form Almighty. One only come to know about their importance when they are no more. Always love your parents the most.
Kulbhushan sir did excellent work... specially in end part... excellent use of classical music
Perfect choice for characters... Screenplay..Music.. Everything !
ये शायद एकमात्र ऐसा धारावाहिक होगा जिसमें अकबर की मृत्यु बताई गई है।।।
All the episodes of bharat ek khoj are very useful for students.
Mostly fake history
@@Fdux seems you know the real story...
The actor who is playing the role of akbar is good with respect but om puri sir is something else ,on a whole different level ❤
The Sloka and Chanting in begging is just 👌 👏 👍 😍
Vinod Rathod is at its best...just wow...👏👏👏
All carectors is work done is good
Specifically khulbuushun Kharbanda
And tansen abul fazal all good 🌞🌞
Great
Akbar and salim be like kalin bhaiya and munna bhaiya
😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
But Munna bhaiya was able.
Kulbhushan Kharbanda was Akbar and Akbar's father in law too in Jodha Akbar
Yeah he was Raja Bharmal of Ajmer in 2008 movie Jodha Akbar
What a great land India is... Mother India had bore so many great sons of her.
If you pay attention to the get up of Kulbhushan Kharbanda then you will realise that it closely resembles with the portrait of Akbar including the face
43:03 what a scene
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Isme koi shaq nhi k Badshah Akbar ki Shaqsiyat aaj bhi Lubhati h❤
Aur Hume maharana pratap ki..
Aur humme maharana pratap ki
Yes he was great king❤🎉
Tansen is plaued by vidom rathod the legendry singer.. Wow!
The first song "tori jai jai kartaar" is based on Raga Priya Dhanashree, not on Mian Ki Malhar.
Whatever a father say, whatever threats he gives and however angry he is, blood is blood,as seen in the episode!! Even the GREAT Akbar, ultimately, gave in to his love for his own son and didn't do or act anything against Salim, even though he had killed his best friend, Abul Fazal and was always disobeying his orders! This is called blind love, the love a father has for his sons and daughters,but, unfortunately, the scene is different when it is a question of the love of the sons and daughters for their own parents, because we always see and read about this or that children torturing and abusing their old parents for money, property and sometimes just because they don't want to take care of their own old parents!! Our great Indian culture!! Jai shree Ram!
No fake acting
100% content
100% fake history
43:02 epic 🤧😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
It is the excellent way to understand history
Well this is not actual history. Let me give you an example Akbar had no wife named Jodha Bai she actually was the wife of his son Salim Aka Jahangir. This is a major mistake and there are a lot of mistakes like this.
@@gvbhnnnnnnhh akbarnaama vol 2, gives entire chapter on akbars marriage with bharmals daughter,only her name is lost in history
Tansen wah kya aawaz hai akbar ka anmol ratan
Kulbhushan kharbanda and Sunil Sir had played excellent roles
Epic scene @ 43:00
This episode indirectly showing that Worst blood is alway worst....and Sanskar is always Sanskar⭐
Mugals,mirzas,sayeds all have same history ,sons killing fathers
Because it is based on official stand of govt of india
4:12 offhhhhh😍😍🤤🤤
21:59 imagine what the commander was thinking
The khayal had not been invented during Akbar's time. Drupad and Dhamar used to be sung then. Shyam Benegal ought to known better. Research about the period, in this regard it must be said, is sadly missing.
damn subtitles are missing crucial parts at the end.
दुसरो के घर मे आग लगाने वालो के अपने घर भी इसी तरह जल जाते है
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
hello this i a good serial and should return to dd
51:27 history laughing at that Maulana because it's very well known that Jahangir indeed took revenge from Khusrou.
अकबर की सम्राट अशोक से तुलना नहीं हो सकती।
Akbar the great badshah
The great loda
🤣 🤣
One of worlds best King
अच्छा लगता ह ज़ब मुग़लो को पिंचर लगाते देखता हु
mazaak mat kro unhone 400 saal raaj kiya sab mughalo ki biwiya rajput hi thi.😅
When Shakaal Crowned Meghnaad
Legendary show a❤❤❤❤❤ Akbàr the great ❤❤❤
मै तो ऊने आगरा मे भेजने की सोच रयो थो ।🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kisine not nahi kia par jo background me designwali jali dikh rhi hai ,wo bilkul same hai Original Akbar ke mahal me or dusre mughal structure me...
from 29:10 , jodhabai perforning puja and applying tilak on head of Akbar ... it isn't seem convincing enough ...
56:04 Proves history repeat itself, similarity between Ashoka and Akbar. Names start with "A" ruled by Mars.
Akbar was his title. His real name was Jalaluddin Muhammad
@@mayankbisht7691 Whatapp university?
@@dearliar8506 lean history first
@@dearliar8506 You didnt even get education from whatsapp university. Jalaluddin Muhammad is his name, Akbar was a title, a reign title. Like that of Aurangzeb and Alamgir.
Whenever Tansen sings, something bad happens...
hahaha
panauti
Panouti😆😁😉
7:20 AGAR HAZMOLA HOTA TO SHAYAD AKBR BCH ZATA
Akbar the great
Enke purvajo chngej khan or temur ne srab ko hram smja or ye uski hi lat se mr gye
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
They used to drink a lot
@@meghasharma9122 islye margaye kyunke Apne Baap-dadaon ki Adaton ko Bhool Gai sharab Haram hai aik Sacha Musalman sharab kabhi Nhi pita😎
Jay shivaji
Murkh ahat Tumhe Video Badal Comment kara Nako Tethae Urmat Agaav Pana karu Naka
😠😬😈😈😆
It based on Nehru's view on Indian history many things are distorted
How terrible end !!! So sad...
Ramayan ke meghnath ka bura haal me hai
Dada nalayak tha per pota nahi, Sultan-e-hindh Aurangzeb Alamgir
The singer is vinod rathod
Look at his face 45:03 😂
Just click on newest first and see how the hatred messages match election time .
16:59
Akbar was not as good as written in history. He killed and beheaded the last Hindu king of Delhi Hemchandra and beheaded him. His head was hanged on the red fort. Akbar made Rajputs to surrender to him and married their daughters to get them under Islamic law. Typical Islam strategy. Lots of cruelty done by Akbar during early period of his invasion to India has been purposely removed from texts to show his secular face. In reality Hindus suffered in every Islamic invasion and rulers for hundreds of years. Young generation should know the truth about history and based on facts and not fiction of movies and TV.
This the shoulder Strength of Akbar
Akbar was not a great democrat or even an ideal KING but he was certainly a better Indian monarch than any Hindu King who preceded or followed him.Ashoka may be an exception.
Akbar was just 14 that time and Bairam khan was the man who beheaded Hemu, Not Akbar, nothing was in Akbar's hands, he was totally under Bairam's control, according to some resources he even urged Bairam to not to kill hemu, bt Bairam did it.
I also agree that Jalaludin Akbar was only 13 years old during the Second Battle of Panipat, when he didn't want to behead Raja Hemuchandra because the Raja was pleading for forgiveness and the Emperor wanted to let him go and his General and Guardian Bairam Khan wanted to punish the Raja and he did just that
Jai hind jai holly Israel jai Ukraine God jesus christ bless all of you amen
अकबर द ग्रेट
He neeeds ENO
Now when I see this , I find it only a propaganda series. इस Leftist propaganda Tv series ने बचपन हमें बहुत चू बनिया था ।
Ashok jaisa koi bhi raja nahi hua india mai
Itne begunah logo ko mar ke or orto ki izzat lut ke khuda se mafi mang rha h
42:55 😌 😂
Ye hai Mughals
Ha yahi hai jinhine 400 saal raaj kiya.😅sabki biwiyarajput thi.
*Historical whitewashing of Akbar*
“ _As directed by the word of God, we as far as it is within our power, remain busy in Jihad and owing to the kindness of the Supreme Lord, who is the promoter of our victories, we have succeeded in occupying a number of forts and towns belonging to the infidels and have established Islam there. With the help of our bloodthirsty sword we have razed the signs of infidelity from their minds and have destroyed temples in those places and also all over Hindustan._ ” - *Declaration of Jalal-ud-Din Mohammed Akbar, after the conquest of Chittor, 1568 (Fatehnama-e-Chittor)*
That was initial part of his reign where his every policy was based upon conquest .But when he started to consolidate Mughal empire,He became a different ruler.
If I am an emporer and find your dynasty revolting against mine, I would do the same thing that Akbar did. That's how things were back then, it was 16th century not 21st century. Different times, different morals..get a grip.
@@synthtastic74 Did he also destroy the shrines and religious sites of muslim rebels & install such plaques declaring destruction of infidelity there? Nopes. Clearly, it was a case of bigotry- difeerent religion, different morals. correct your grip. on history.
@@synthtastic74 if you are premising your argument upon the idea that with time, there is a linear growth in morals of religious tolerance, then obviously the rule of Islamic kings in India meant several steps backward, i.e a period of de-growth. more than 1500 years prior to Akbar (largely seen as the most liberal ruler among Mughals), there was already an example of much superior tolerance in Ashoka. Here's his command: “The king … honours all religious sects … with gifts and with honours of various kinds. But he does not value gifts or honour as much as the promotion of the essentials of all religious sects. The root of this is guarding one’s speech so that neither praising one’s own sect nor blaming others’ sects should occur on improper occasions; and it should be moderate on every occasion. And others’ sects should be honoured on every occasion. Acting thus, one both promotes one’s own sect and benefits others’ sects. Acting otherwise, one both harms one’s own sect and wrongs others’ sects. For whoever praises their own sect or blames another’s sect out of devotion to their own sect with a view to showing it in a good light, instead severely damages their own sect. Coming together is good, so that people should both hear and appreciate each other’s teaching.” (Major Rock Edict 12)
learn the difference between history and hagiography. history writing, by rule, has to accommodate the unpleasant aspects of iconic figures. learn to accept history as it reveals itself to you, rather than staying in disingenuous denial. grow up.
Akbar's conquest of Chittor (1566-68) was led by Hindu generals. Even his favorute wife (who was a hindu rajput, erroneously called Jodha Bai) was present with him on this campaign. If it really was about establishing Islam, why would he give so much power and freedom to hindus and engage with them on a personal level? Compare it with Aurangzeb's attitudd and you will see who was motivated by power and religion and who was motivated by just power. Akbar was a power hungry ruler that made him do terrible things, like other power hungry rulers, but he was not a religious bigot. Akbar passed laws against slavery because he personally abhorred it. But the state of Mewar was long defiant, so it heurt it's ego and he ordered imprisonment and destruction. The battle for Chittor, the rivalry between Akbar and Pratap is legendary, but the notion that it was based on religion is totally baseless. If it was about religion, Akbar wouldn't have Hindu soldiers and generals fighting on his side, and Pratap's army wouldn't have Muslims.
15:00
Mughlo me ,, Sultan ul Azeem Hazrat AURANGZEB Alamgir Ale Rehma sarvsresth hai,, aur bharat ke Itihas ,, aur bhavishya me jitne bhi sasak hue, aur honge ,, sab me sarvshreshth hai
Aurangzeb ke bohot saare abba hue jinn mein Chhatrapati Shivaji , aur Guru Gobind Singh the .
@@orionstar2945 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣, jhut bolte sharam nahi aati,, in dono ki aukat unke nokar jitni nahi,, ye dono chuhe the,, jinko saza di gai
tansen bhi converted tha asli naam tha Ramtanu Pandey
Lol
lehru naam ka dalal is desh ka pradhanmantri bana durbhagya hai!
42:22
Or Maharana Pratap ki kahani gayab h, ye hai dogle nehru ki history.
Actually Indian History was written by Britishers which were reading
Hasi ati hai tum jaise ghadhe par
Maharana Pratap ki chhoti se riysat ki Raza tha Akbar Hindustan ka bus yahi Fark hai
Dude. British did do archaeological research and compiled the history. But saying they wrote the history is childish, immature and ignorant. History is based on historical documents, archaeological evidence etc. Akbars history is based on various historical texts and chronically written during his and his sons time. Most prominent Akbarnama. It's TRUE that history is written by the victors and could be biased and also dependant on interpretations
Nehru Brahman pundit tha na ki musalman
42:00
😃😃😃😃
And all said.................. AKABAR WAS GREAT,,,,,,,,,,,, hahahahaaaaaaa
red bull/hunk
mugle aajam movie was a joke...............
4.30 Vinod Rathod playing Tansen !!
Laser eyes
Salim k pappa bhi usko pit te the
vinod sir
Murad funny
अशोक महान सम्राट था उसकी तुलना अकबर से करना इतिहास का अपमान है।
Akbar bhi mahan samrat tha
@@AryanKumar-yu6ke भारतीय वामपंथी इतिहासकारों की नजर में अकबर महान था/है। बाकी तो यहां के तथाकथित वामपंथी इतिहासकारों ने चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य, समुद्रगुप्त, चन्द्रगुप्त विक्रमादित्य, स्कन्दगुप्त, हर्षवर्धन आदि को महान नही कहा और पाठ्यक्रमों में इन पर 2-4 पेज से अधिक नही लिखा जबकि ये सभी सम्राट महानता की सभी परिभाषाओ पर खरे उतरते हैं और अकबर से इनका स्थान ऊँचा है लेकिन आमजन इनके विषय में या तो बहुत कम जानता है या जानता ही नही ये दुर्भाग्य है की इन सम्राटों को हमनें इतिहास में सही स्थान नही दिया, क्या महान चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य की सम्पूर्ण भारत विजय इस योग्य न थी की उसे महान कहा जाए? या स्कन्दगुप्त की बर्बर हूणों पर विजय इतिहास में जगह पाने योग्य नही? या चंद्रगुप्त विक्रमादित्य की शकों पर विजय और उसके राज्य की महान समृद्धि जहां सभी पन्थ और धर्म अपने चर्मोत्कर्ष पर थे व्यापार वाणिज्य कला संस्कृति में इतिहास में सर्वश्रेष्ठ फिर भी उसे महान नही कहा गया ये कैसा न्याय? ये पक्षपातपूर्ण लेखन नही तो और क्या। रही बात अकबर के संदर्भ में तो हां हम ये कह सकते हैं की भारत के जितने भी मुस्लिम शासक हुए उनमें निश्चित ही गुण और कर्म की दृष्टि से अकबर सर्वश्रेष्ठ था।
Ashok killed his brothers & slaves of kaling war
..
Bharat ek khoj nahi Neharu ki chaplus soch
Pechele episodes mei Vedic society aur kahi hindu rajeyo kei baari mei baat Kiya toh joot thi fir?
Choda Bai!!
Bharat ke putr Maharana Pratap the us 1500 sadi ke Akbar hatiyaara or anpad gvaar Kuta kamina tha kabi Maharana Pratap Singh ji ke samne to gya nhi jhund me jata tha.
Ek dam sahi kaha bahi. Maharana Pratap ji is great. Jai maharana pratap ji ki🚩🚩🚩🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Are yaar maharana pratap to khud junglon me chupa rahta tha
@@muhammadasadkhan4425 abd usse guerrilla warfare kehta hai. Jiski wajah se Maharana Pratap ne mughlo ko unki aukat dikha di thi. Aur woh kabhi jungle mein nahi . Aravalli hills mein kai forts the wanha woh apna base banate the.
Maharana Pratap itna mahaan hota toh akbar ku haraya kyun nahi
Rajput ki hi zimmedari thy na hindustan ko bachane ka phir hua kiya kyu har mane mughlo se
NEHRUs work of FICTION....great music by vanraj bhatia....great actors otherwise
Ye fiction work nhi hakikat thi smjhe
@@parvez2917 abey jaaa
@@Fdux tu jaa be saale tmij se baat kr
@@parvez2917 zada sasur na ban.. jaa tel lene.... bakwas nahi... foot yaha se muh na lag
@@Fdux tu foot yha se pehli fursat me nikal chal
Pt. Nehru"s Discovery of India was very influenced by the western Political thoughts and western and Marxist Historians. He observed Indian history from THE Perspective his westernise education. He found similarities between Ashok and Akbar and called both of them Messiah of Secularism and Peace, also Akbar was described as A great King as well as he was termed as a Modern democratic leader who equated and termed all religins as one. He propagated DIN E ILAHI religion which was based on equality. Despite this Akbar was very rigid and tyrant ruler who fought most of the battles in the name of Islam and DIN. Calling him Secular and pious was abig mistake he imposed many restriction on the Females of the Royal harem and was very Orthodox in female matters.
He has written about Akbar what other historians had also written the same, there is everything about Akbar, historians has written everything, no one is perfect but he was beyond his time.
Jahangir was not so bad as they show in this episode
@@deamonofshiva he was worse than the depiction
@@nishattarique2681*No I have read 📚 his own Autobiography & Now All I can say He was Excellent emperor*
No much about the great Rana prathap Singh.dont highlight Akbar as hero
He is a Hero..Maharana is nothing in world Histrory
@@kaviikanak35 not accepted , while he ceased chittorgarh fort ,he killed more than 15 k civilians
Great pm great book not like these days saffron wild dogs sitting in parliament
All the people I mention are all Indian Hindus from the Khumbar caste. It is very likely that Akbar was Bhagwan Ali Chitroda, Salim = Sa Lam a verbal recording of history known in Katha played countries. Shiekhbaba was Known in UK as Issac Newton and his real name was Bhagwan Jasan Chitroda he is my direct ancestor. 🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
Abey chal be lodu, sala chutiya sapno mein jee rha hai.
Lol.... what's this.... aakhir khna kya chahte ho😅
Shehzada Saleem koi darpok NH tha ... Shehzada Saleem ek but bahadur r insaaf famous hai..adal e jhangeer k naam see ghalat histroy btarhe Hain ..mughl e Azam film m alag histry dikhai r is drame m alag ... Jhoti histroy... Saleem ki histroy ghalat btai bht. Saleem bachpan m sharabi tha phr use Jung k medaan m bhejdya that Jahan usne bahaduri r Fateh k jhande gaare.
😁😁Akber darpok tha vo kabhi maharana pratap ke samne nahi aaya itna darpok ki rajpooto se rajputon ko ladvaya na ki muglo ko kayar mugle sale dhoke se shasan kiya himmat hoti to aage se vaar karte
@@technicalboykrishna4963 aby jb Rajput ek dosre k dushman hon r ek dosre ko gaddi ki lalach m katne ko tyar hon to unse lar k time waste nh krte the Mughal ise siyasat kehte hain munne r jaiz hai ye siyasat se apne dushman ko khatam krna... Bina khoon bahae... R jb jb zarorat pari tb tb larai hui r Mughals ne fateh pai... Bad m marathas ne kabza kia Mughals ki Zameen pe jb Mughals kamzor hoe... Jhangeer k bad... Us se pehle ek inch Zameen b nh haare Mughals history parhle... Rajputs ne apni beti yaa dede k zameenein li r apna raaj bachaya hua tha tax pay krte the wo Mughals ko unke under hukumat krke. R is m koi buri bat nh thi ye Mughals ki zahanat thi unki siyasi kabiliyat thi jo unho ne Hindustan pe raaaj kia sbko sath Lee k chale. Insaaf k sath
@@muzaffaralimemon9002 hamari language me ise siyasat nahi kahte buzdeel kahte he
Behlol khan kitna bura mara gya ta ,akbar ka commander ta ,,ja k pdh lijiye jara
@@sameerkatta8692behalol ko maharana pratap ne hi mara tha ek vaar me hi gode samet kat diya tha
42:31
42:57
43:03
43:01