Limits of Knowledge: Philosophy A-Level

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лип 2024
  • Dive into the depths of philosophical skepticism with this enlightening video. Explore Descartes' ingenious response to the three waves of doubt, unraveling the foundations of knowledge amidst uncertainty. Delve further as we uncover Empiricist counterarguments, dissecting their perspectives on skepticism and the quest for truth. Join us on a journey through the intricate landscapes of epistemology and the enduring philosophical debates that shape our understanding of reality.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4

  • @ielafosman7032
    @ielafosman7032 2 місяці тому +2

    can you go through the 25 markers you did leading up to and during the exam? Did you make essay plans in preparation for the exam, did you just do practice questions, or was it a mix of both?

  • @rogertheultimaterabbit
    @rogertheultimaterabbit 3 місяці тому

    good summary of the philosophical points but probably needs some clear world examples of peoples sensory perceptions and how we get the most basic logic to judge whether our perceptions are reliable and we share the same congruent reality with other people to share descriptions of our experiences.

    • @samfindon03
      @samfindon03  3 місяці тому

      Really appreciate you for taking the time to comment @rogertheultimaterabbit, I will consider this feedback in subsequent videos. To your point, my understanding of the empiricist position is that sensory perceptions like seeing/ touching the keyboard I am using to type this, is reliable due to the fact it is an experience which is involuntary, meaning the experience is not open to manipulation. Our experiences may not be exactly the same, qualia is subjective, but our descriptions are functional, and can be validated with scientific experiment which shows consistency between our experience of the external world and the external world itself.

  • @rogertheultimaterabbit
    @rogertheultimaterabbit 3 місяці тому

    How well can you define terms and conditions of logic when you have several spelling mistakes in your first proposition