Deflection of Beams Problem | Macaulay's Method | simply supported beam | GATE

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @massivelystressed2099
    @massivelystressed2099 2 роки тому +14

    Easy explanation for such a complicated concept.. you saved me.
    Thank you so much sir 🙏

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому +3

      You are most welcome. Kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @lukhonabawuti7147
    @lukhonabawuti7147 2 роки тому +8

    Perfectly explained Sir thanks for the content!

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the comment. Kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @PereraArunodha
    @PereraArunodha Рік тому +2

    Perfect sir😊❤

  • @vedsoni3600
    @vedsoni3600 2 роки тому +4

    I had one question: When integrating (x-3), why do we consider that as a single term? If we integrate them individually [(x^2/2)-(3*x)], this will change the value of C1 later on giving us different answers.

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому +5

      We should consider (x-3) as a single term. Because, it represents the distance of load 40KN from the reference as a single term. The whole term 40(x-3) is the moment of 40 KN load fro the reference.

    • @okunlolafz
      @okunlolafz Рік тому +1

      @@michaelthomasrex I have been searching for answer to this question for a very long time. I'm so glad I came across your video and this reply. Thank you so much!

  • @santhoshramv9036
    @santhoshramv9036 2 роки тому +2

    Nice explanation sir and understandable sir

  • @indianmusicvibrations3758
    @indianmusicvibrations3758 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks you very much Sir!.... 🥰

  • @galibshaikh3632
    @galibshaikh3632 11 місяців тому +1

    Subscribing because of your this wonderful explanation!!! Thanks sir🫂

  • @-ShahjebChoudhury
    @-ShahjebChoudhury 2 роки тому +1

    Nice video 👍 it is understandable

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому

      Thanks for your comments. Kindly subscribe to the channel.

  • @gajjivijay8207
    @gajjivijay8207 2 роки тому +2

    Sir there is 45kN but u tack 40 kN

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому +3

      In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

  • @sadhvikbutti.sadhvik2987
    @sadhvikbutti.sadhvik2987 8 місяців тому

    Sir Ra+Rb=48+45=93
    But u consider 48+40=88

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  7 місяців тому

      "There's a typo in the question; please consider replacing '45' with '40'."

  • @syedjawaharhussain3208
    @syedjawaharhussain3208 2 роки тому +1

    Ra+Rb=93 not 88 that means 48+45=93

    • @michaelthomasrex
      @michaelthomasrex  2 роки тому +1

      In the problem, the point load is wrongly mentioned as 45 KN, but it is actually 40 KN. In the illustration, it is clearly given as 40 KN. Now, Ra+Rb=88 KN. Thanks for the comments. kindly subscribe the channel.

    • @rohitsomware
      @rohitsomware Рік тому

      48+40 ahe re...