They specialized. Some surgeons became experts at amputations, and would brag about how quickly they could amputate and the quality of flesh left behind to make the stumps; others tied off the arteries, while orderlies (medics) would prepare the stump. On a battlefield where hundreds, if not thousands, needed urgent medical care all at the same time time was at a premium.
About half of the Grande Armee marching into Russia wasn't French but were allies. To think only 10,000 got out of Russia is just a complete catastrophe
600 000 soldiers goes to Moscow, half of them were conscript of the conquered lands but, only 60 000 came back to home. Most of them died of decease or frozen. There is still 540 000 corpses along the road to moscow nowadays, somewhere under our feet
Well the conscripted probably died like flies. They could hardly stand up to the muket volleys and grapeshot. The French line infantry and the young, middle and old Guards were another level of brave. The Russians too fought without regard for their lives. They were accustomed to the harsh life and weather of Russia.
On Moscow and St Petersburg. The actual capitol of Russia in 1812 was were the czar was. So locate and attack the czar then Napoleon can have his decisive battle on his terms not Kutuzovs.
Say what you will but I admire pragmatism such as this. A kjnd of maturity in war. The Russian philosophy in War always seems to be "it doesn't matter if we can't win- we'll just take you down to Hell with us." And it's worked. No matter their enemy is half dead by the time it takes them to reach the capital in the first place. And then they circle in for the kill. When the foe is complacent thinking to have achieved the impossible in capturing such an obviously important location. The Slavic Race hounded the Huns to death, absorbed or otherwise overthrew the Golden Horde, orchestrated the final downfall of the Teutonic Order, defeated Hitler and Napoleon. Even after that they are still the same. Still the extremely pragmatic and hardened people. There is a lot to learn here. And Napoleon failed to learn it. Borodino is the place whee Napoleon's unstoppable army finalky met a wall that simply refused to give. An army of recruits and hastily assembled ragtag army groups coalesced to give battle to the vaunted elite of the Emperor's Grand Armee. They traded blows, two caged fighters in the ring each unwilling to give up. And for the first time, the champion faced an enemy who simply wouldn't back down. This battle to me is awfully like the fights from the Rocky series- Apollo, Ivan Drago, and the fight from the Balboa comeback movie. It doesn't matter if you kill me today, tomorrow or in a hundred years. I'll kill you if I leave everything but my bones behind.
"[w]hen we are ready to sever a Part from its whole, and reflect on the cruel means we are going to make use of, none can help trembling and sharing a part of the Misfortune with the Poor Patient, who is resolv'd to the fatal Necessity of being depriv'd of one of his Parts of his Body for this Whole Life." [from piratesurgeon.com] I think it is pretty safe to say that not even the surgeons themselves were safe from the trauma
Obviously war IS glorious in some sense, but, as the sanctity, is the top of the mankind can achieve; this is not for everyone. The terrible and sublime walks together, as well as the valor and the terror.
Back in XIII, XIV and XV century war could be considered "glorious" in some way . Knights had a very strict code of honor, and battles where two christian armies clashed, were not that deadly. Knights preferred to take another noble hostage, than to kill him. Even though knights considered themselves superior to peasants and burgess, they would usually not kill man of lower status because they were fellow christians. This is where the cutting of two fingers from english archers started. They were captures, french could simply kill them, but they did't, because that was not noble (of course it is still a war, and people committed horrible crimes back then too). Back then wounds were not as serious as later, when you was hit with a arrow, you still had a chance to survive, musket round its a different thing, it was much more complicated, far beyond capabilities of then medicine. War changed, when it started to become more and more industrialized. There was no place for knight's in shining armors, heavy cavalry costed fortune and a barely trained peasant could kill a horseman in armor worth more than his village, with one lucky shot. War started to become a blood bath in renaissance, technology led to more and more deadly weapons, and that led to bigger armies. More and more people died on the battlefields, this reached its peak at WWI, when war became totally inhumane. There was a very short period in late medieval, when european warfare could be considered in some way romantic and glorious, during that time war was considered a trade of nobility and conscription armies were really rare, it all changed in XVI century.
Moscow was not official capital at that time, she was big commercial culteral center of Russia like New Yerk in America. It was the stratigic decision to save army to regroupe it and to strike. General Washington did the same thing to save continental army during evacuation from New York
Moscow was the Capital of The Grand Principality of Muscovy, however, and remained so after the founding of the Tsardom of Russia. in the 15th century (1600's) Peter the Great fought a war against Carolus Rex of Sweden and captured Neva from the Swedes. He spent over a year fortifying the city and after the war moved his Capital to the City which he renames to St. Petersburg. It remained the Capital until after the Revolution in 1918ish. You also don't have 'second capitals', Moskva was just part of Russias power base, like Novgorod or Nzinzy Novgorod and taking the city would cripple the ability of Russia to field strong armies and Moskva was the home of Russia's great cannon foundries.
+Joseph And you ignored literally everything else I said. At the time if Napoleans conquests Moskva was an important city due to its manufactories. In a similar vein to Hull, the home of some of Englands largest Shipyards, or Oxford the centre of Education. It was a politically influential city BUT all the important stuff was decided in St Petersburg.
And it wasn't just the amputation-if you survived you'd go through about 6 months of extreme pain during healing and lucky if the doctors gave you an opiate for pain. Most of the time the stump was useless for prosthetics because speed was of the essence during amputation leaving a granulated bone stump sticking out. It wasn't until the American Civil War general anesthesia was in widespread use and the doctors could actually take the time to sew up a skin flap over the stump for a prosthetic. Still, 'laudable puss' was fully expected by the surgeons as a sign the body was healing. Clear, runny puss meant the infection had spread to the blood and you were doomed to die an extremely painful death.
@@chrismath149 his defeat was a question of superior numbers he had been beaten before Waterloo and even if he had won there were 250 000 austro-Russians on the march!
i would say the guard performed the greatest at the defense of krasnoi as they got there first and were allowing the rest of the army a safe passage, at the beresina, it was ney, oudinot and victor that performed the most
Sadly, there was no other way to fight for line infantry. They had to march into the battle in big formations with tight ranks unlike light infantry becouse of ineffectivity of their muskets.
Lord Alehandro Its becouse Polish legions were more experienced and most importantly they were volunteers, so their morale was higher, therefore maintaining order and discipline was easier for them.
Polski Ślachcic At this time square formation was new and old tactique where not change and for a unit who was not in line form a square will be more longer ;P .
In real life the hero is not guaranteed to win in the end, not even Napoleon could withstand against the might of all the greatest nations in the world.
@@zz424 Napoleon save France against 7 seven coalition of more powerfull country who wanted to end the Revolution and the spreading of democratic ideas, by instauring an empire and imposing his military genius, he saved France and the new ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity.
@@flouy7430 Napoleon did a lot of good, but he also did initiate The Peninsular War and the invasion of Russia (Tsar Alexander I is to blame though since he broke off the treaty). Both of which were his most disastrous conflicts.
@@thenablade858 but add up the coalition casualties of wars he didn’t start and they actually exceed those 2 he did start. Not defending Napoleon from all guilt, he’s responsible for a lot of bad, I’m just blaming the coalition too. Both responsible for war deaths. But Napoleons got enduring reforms and a third of the world derived their legal system from Napoleonic code. Give me the self made emperor who reforms the law, over the throne inheriting monarchs who represent the old order
The tactics of close formations was for the sake of effective control of troops, since officers could only depend on the range of their voice. This disconnect between tactics and the capabilities of weapons would only be solved by the advent of man-portable radios after WW1.
That was Kutuzov's genius, draw the Enemy in, burn what you don't need. Moscow was lost yes, Moscow was burnt yes, but Moscow could and was rebuilt. It takes longer to recruit, train and equip a large Army, large enough to fight Napoleon in great land battles, what Kutuzov did was preserve a large part of the Russian Army for the incessant winter attacks Napoleon suffered on his great retreat. Russians, masters of winter fighting, Napoleon's elementary mistake, he forgot the winter.
Napoleon didn’t lose because of winter. He lost before. Dysentery and Typhus killed his Grande Armée. His soldiers became sick in Poland and died en masse even before reaching Smolensk.
@@walideg5304 exactly the winter thing is such a myth at this point. People be like don’t invade Russia in winter ! Napoleon left Paris in 1812 on the 24th June, that’s not winter. It wasn’t russia back then but looking at Subutai and the mongols Id say that winter is actually the best time to invade them
Sweden's Crown Prince, former Marshal Bernadotte, was offered command of all Russia's armies. Bernadotte declined for political reasons. But he had been giving Alexander I advice all through the Russian Campaign. He told Alexander, he cannot defeat Napoleon in pitched battles, you must trade time for space. Napoleon uses maneuver, wear him out in a futile chase deeper into Russia. Napoleon lives off the land, so scorch the Earth. Retreat until Napoleon is spread too thin, and then strike at his flanks. In the end, Napoleon's mandate rests on victory. Bernadotte told Alexander that he could lose every battle but win the war because he only needed to outlast the French to win and because of the depth of the loyalty of the Russian people.
At Waterloo the advancing French columns of 30 000 men was shot at point blank range with canister shot. And the bullets from the British field artillery would smash it's way through the ranks of 15 men before it ended in the chest of the 16th man. Imagine the red slaughter.
Cannister shot does not travel far after it has hit something. They're more or less over-sized musketballs. A cannonball however, would go right through a formation. But not a "bullet?" What are you going on about, man! Talk some sense! And it wasn't British artillery but rather the Prussians flanking the French that would turn Waterloo into an Allied victory. And Wellington only had about 30,000 actual British troops, a third of his army. The rest was made up of Germans, Dutch and Belgians.
Wellington engaged Napoleon knowing the Prussians would arrive, in fact he sent a message informing them of his plan. It was not some miraculous arrival out of the blue. It was an Allied victory, but one orchestrated by Wellington with it's most critical moments decided by British soldiers. There is always people like you who try to downplay the British contribution.
There are all sorts of different views on what actually happened at Waterloo and who did what. Some historians believe the French were retreating before the Prussians even got there. But, who cares? The fact is Napoleon was a brilliant military leader and needed the cooperation of all of Europe to defeat him.
Imagine your leg being sawed off, nothing to numb the pain, just so you had a coinflip chance of not also dying a slow painful death but instead living the rest of your life as a useless cripple if you are LUCKY. Oh and by the way, you are a million miles into Russia away from home, where it's turning into winter. Even a perfectly able-bodied healthy French officer who had his own horse had very little chance of making it back alive. Even Napoleon barely made it back. If it were me on the table I ask for a prayer and a bullet.
And to make it even more sinister, the guy getting the amputation, that is Kuragin, yep, the one who ensnared and deluded Natasha, Bolkonsky's fiancée, in his absence just days before they would have actually rejoined, and also, btw., Pierre's (i.e., Bolkonsky's best friend) brother in law. ... Well. I wouldn't be surprised either. Gotta keep in mind, the original title is like "War and Mir", i.e. the Russian wordfor "peace", but also "world" and or "universe", while in German it's coming from "me" and/or "I" - no brain-twister here, actually.
혹시나 관련 영상 찾기 힘드실까봐 링크들 좀 정리해 봤습니다. 너무 옛날 클래식한 영화들이 많기는 한데... (워털루나 BBC 전쟁과 평화 같은 유명한 작품들은 뺐습니다.) ua-cam.com/video/b11dRiHfcLk/v-deo.html 반도 전쟁 ua-cam.com/video/Yj_sIMvFLCQ/v-deo.html 세인트헬레나 유배 ua-cam.com/video/5o5No-HQm7o/v-deo.html 나폴레옹 장례식 행렬 ua-cam.com/video/TZy_xV278L8/v-deo.html 아일라우 전투 (영화) ua-cam.com/video/_ys46ocxx-M/v-deo.html 전쟁과 평화 (2007년작) -ep03까지 ua-cam.com/video/mRIb46yvHy0/v-deo.html 빈 회의 ua-cam.com/video/Oonn4ByxcD0/v-deo.html 보로디노 전투 ua-cam.com/video/2a8AsPfYuDQ/v-deo.html 독일 전역 ua-cam.com/video/DR52GRKYa3I/v-deo.html 러시아 전역 -ep03까지
@@manilajohn0182 Before Borodino Napoleon is left with 1/4 of his army., after the battle 1/5 and still no good plan. Vauban is a top french general who cared about losses and avoided them
@@2adamast Ahh, I see what you mean. Vauban was certainly an outstanding general; there's no doubt about that. That said, I believe that the Emperor's point was that men die in war- and a good general can't allow himself to be swayed in his judgment by this fact.
"Sniper Check" Saluting is Not required for AdCs and messengers. Aids and Messengers were mostly junior officers, chosen for particular qualities, and exempted from common military courtesies while performing their Duties. Think of it like you Don't salute the radio that is transmitting orders or reports 🤔
On en est donc arrivé là : des acteurs français parlant anglais pour jouer Napoléon et ses soldats ! En plus, Mathieu Kassovitz est très peu crédible en Napoléon...pourquoi pas Depardieu parlant russe...
Ah bon, Napoléon n'est pas un héros ? Je vous met la définition : "Celui qui se distingue par ses exploits ou un courage extraordinaire (dans le domaine des armes). Mourir en héros. synonymes : brave, héroïque" Si Napoléon n'est pas le type même du héros je ne vois pas qui pourrait le surpasser, à part Alexandre ou César ? Ceci dit, à quand Arielle Dombasle en Jeanne d'Arc et parlant anglais ?
Quand tu regarde tes filme à la tele/ciné, les voix sont en français non? Pourquoi les anglais n'auraient pas droit a leur doublage anglais? Puis je parie que t'es le premier a râler quand dans certains filme étranger diffusé en France ont les voix sont sous-titré au lieu de doublé.
@@Briselance I forgot what this was all about. Two things come to mind. 1. Napoléon would have won Waterloo if not for two things: a. his obsession with the farm, and b. his refusal to give Marshall Ney his extra troops so he could force a rout. The other thing is that people of immense privilege think they are immune to adversity. Everything has always gone their way. In modern times we see this being played out in a baffling way with Trump and Harry, who cannot accept any form of loss or disobedience in their new roles. Especially, the English found it hard to conceive of the continental monkeys being able to harm them. Perhaps you recall the famous story of such a guy riding along with Wellington, commenting "Hey, I am hit" in utter astonishment. "So you are," was the answer. The rich kid could not believe this was possible. Wellington was more experienced and more a man of the world. Imagine having been surrounded by sycophants and obsequious servants all of your life (having fired anyone you didn't like). Many rich people fall into this trap.
Out of all the Generals in the Russian Imperial Army the only one that had the BALLS to give that order (and BE OBEYED at the same time!) WAS KUTUZOV. He was the one that saved the Russian Army (or what remained of it after Borodino at least!) - even at the cost of leaving Moscow to Napoleon. HE was the one that - in fact - saved Russia during that fall and - especially - during the winter that was soon to come - strenghtening it, training it, supplying it and - at the end - that was the Army the Russians would carry straight into Paris. Ironically - he wouldn't even see the final victory of that Army, because he'd soon die - if I remember correctly - one or one and a half year after this.
It was still a close run thing. Napoleon had them on the ropes in 1813 and it was only because of the intervention of the Austrians that the Russians got to Paris. If Napoleon had accepted the Frankfurt proposal, he would've kept his empire.
97redbird You, Westerners are wrong on many accounts. Until the Renaissance you had nothing, you had fake history. Everything you have now is originally from East. From Eastern Roman Empire. Slavs and Arabs will conquer you soon. Napoleon was forerunner of fascists. Corsica will gain freedom soon. Bretagne too, Marseille will be the Capital of the Islamic Pijemont.
Interestingly Winston Churchill in his autobiography described the fallen in much the same way after he participated in the Battle of Omdurman. Lying not in heaps but spread out across the battlefield like a carpet of the dead.
Dude you cut off the best part. 3:22 onwards is a reproduction of a famous painting 'Council at Fili' which this episode shows at the end of the scene.
Let there be no doubt what surgery is: it's cutting and sewing, with occasional screws and bolts. The technology changes but the basic principle is still the same. Your body is just clothes and machinery for your brain.
That man was clever at the end. The only way Napoleon could justify such sacrifices and bloodshed was a historically significant victory against Russia with an ends justifies the means narrative. Nobody could attack the myth of Napoleon with Moscow successfully taken and a Russian surrender. But the myth and legend, that aura of invincibility, is shattered in a stalemate where time is Russia's friend. With each passing day from the French perspective, morale, dwindling supplies, disease, logistics, weather, the ever decreasing ability to fight further all plummet in a stalemate as you slowly bled out.
War is a choice for the aggressor, and a necessity for the defender. "Pale Ebenezer thought it wrong to fight, but Roaring Bill, who killed him, thought it right." HILAIRE BELLOC
Soldiers marching in regimented closed ranks while cannon and musket shot tear holes in their perfectly ordered lines. No more than pieces on a chess board to be sacrificed for what they believe to be the greater good. May they all rest in peace.
Interesting that the surgery scenes were partially blanked out. When this BBC production was shown a few year ago it was considered that the British public wasn't so squeamish.
In Japan to be maimed or disfigured is considered shameful. Different broadcast standard. EDIT My bad, Korean. But still a different cultural broadcast standard to the UK.
Here it is tried to show that Kutuzov made some kind of military strategic move - in fact the battle of Borodin happened because it was the last logical place to actually stand against Napoleon's army before his army reached Moscow, because all the time the Russian army was retreating and did not want to see eye to eye face to face with Napoleon's main forces, only fighting small battles with individual units of the opposing battalion. Kutuzov and the Russian army lost the Battle of Borodino, as the Russian army lost about 50,000 of its soldiers while Napoleon only lost about 35,000, although the Russian army had a numerical advantage at the Battle of Borodino - Russia had about 160,000 strong and Napoleon about 130,000.
@Majority Minority Correct, Saint-Petersburg was a russian Capital City back then. Do note, that the officer said "sacred capital", as that's pretty much how Moscow was referred to as. To Russians, Moscow'll always be THE Capital City, as that's where they founded it by the river Moskva. Thank goodness Moscow wasn't the Capital City at the time of Napoleon's war on Imperial Russia, as its loss would demoralize the Russians greatly. The Battle of Borodino would result in Imperial Russian Army marching on France and entering Paris in 1814, crushing his dreams of globalism.
And the poor Russian serfs would stay serfs for 50 more years ... finally the Romanov lost their heads when the Russian understood the shithole which was their country... but they created a monster with the USSR. A massive system to kill en masse
Early Age of Gunpowder to Age of Industrialization,, imo, the worst era to wage war Tight Infantry Formation, marching through thick consecutive fire and deadly artillery bombardment instant dead on field is a bless, than to visit field infirmary
The price of glory. All the pretty uniforms were to be visible to commanding officers. And for commanding officers to be visible by the troops. To me the horror of Napoleonic age warfare was the indifference to the casualties by all sides. Modern warfare numbers with Middle Ages medicine. The Romans had better. And cleaner wounds.
“Get down, Sir!”
“No, I’m a protagonist-
This is amazing.
Anime come back
In the book Tolstoj describes that scene
In the novel he was more of an antagonist to be honest
'No, I have plot armo...'
General Bagration: "it is better to stand for one hour under artillery fire than to spend five minutes in a field infirmary..."
He then died.
"Bravo! Bravo!"
Just what do you think puts you in a field infirmary for the five minutes it takes you to die of the shock of amputation?
@@xhagast Единственным обезболивающим был спирт, но никакой дезинфекции ран инструмента.
WAR is Hell
But
Dam you look good in a uniform
I bring the war every world. You have ever live!! I've starting middleearth and then go to narnia. And there go to? Ah shit, u know where i go?
@@Shredder-z2n All hail Lord Sauron! When you get to Tamriel we might need your help against the argonians.
@@Stormvermin-bx1lh help? I help you if you join in my army
@@Shredder-z2n Darth Vader cameo in Lotr?
I love the way the surgeon walks away once the leg is amputated, as if that is the end of the procedure...
They specialized. Some surgeons became experts at amputations, and would brag about how quickly they could amputate and the quality of flesh left behind to make the stumps; others tied off the arteries, while orderlies (medics) would prepare the stump. On a battlefield where hundreds, if not thousands, needed urgent medical care all at the same time time was at a premium.
About half of the Grande Armee marching into Russia wasn't French but were allies.
To think only 10,000 got out of Russia is just a complete catastrophe
Hmmm more than that. But still 5/6ths didn’t come back.
600 000 soldiers goes to Moscow, half of them were conscript of the conquered lands but, only 60 000 came back to home.
Most of them died of decease or frozen. There is still 540 000 corpses along the road to moscow nowadays, somewhere under our feet
To attenuate these numbers, out of the original 600.000 some 60/70.000 Prussians/Austrians didn't even enter Russia
Well the conscripted probably died like flies. They could hardly stand up to the muket volleys and grapeshot.
The French line infantry and the young, middle and old Guards were another level of brave.
The Russians too fought without regard for their lives. They were accustomed to the harsh life and weather of Russia.
And the German 6th army.
to anyone seeing this, Kutuzov at the end wasn't being humane, his words make perfect sense in military logic and reasoning
Jianghai Hu MOSCOW WAS NOT THE CAPITOL OF RUSSIA N THOSE DAYS!!!!
Jianghai Hu Not true at all. Becuase Moscow fell, and St. Petersburg was fine. The loss of Moscow resulted in Russian victory.
On Moscow and St Petersburg. The actual capitol of Russia in 1812 was were the czar was. So locate and attack the czar then Napoleon can have his decisive battle on his terms not Kutuzovs.
Say what you will but I admire pragmatism such as this. A kjnd of maturity in war. The Russian philosophy in War always seems to be "it doesn't matter if we can't win- we'll just take you down to Hell with us." And it's worked. No matter their enemy is half dead by the time it takes them to reach the capital in the first place. And then they circle in for the kill. When the foe is complacent thinking to have achieved the impossible in capturing such an obviously important location. The Slavic Race hounded the Huns to death, absorbed or otherwise overthrew the Golden Horde, orchestrated the final downfall of the Teutonic Order, defeated Hitler and Napoleon. Even after that they are still the same. Still the extremely pragmatic and hardened people. There is a lot to learn here. And Napoleon failed to learn it. Borodino is the place whee Napoleon's unstoppable army finalky met a wall that simply refused to give. An army of recruits and hastily assembled ragtag army groups coalesced to give battle to the vaunted elite of the Emperor's Grand Armee. They traded blows, two caged fighters in the ring each unwilling to give up. And for the first time, the champion faced an enemy who simply wouldn't back down. This battle to me is awfully like the fights from the Rocky series- Apollo, Ivan Drago, and the fight from the Balboa comeback movie. It doesn't matter if you kill me today, tomorrow or in a hundred years. I'll kill you if I leave everything but my bones behind.
Alt - Monarchist yea but it would be like if the us lost New York
I salute those brave army Doctors. Terrible work, must have been traumatised
Probably not. It was their craft, and medicine back in the day was way more invasive as a rule.
"[w]hen we are ready to sever a Part from its whole, and reflect on the cruel means we are going to make use of, none can help trembling and sharing a part of the Misfortune with the Poor Patient, who is resolv'd to the fatal Necessity of being depriv'd of one of his Parts of his Body for this Whole Life." [from piratesurgeon.com]
I think it is pretty safe to say that not even the surgeons themselves were safe from the trauma
@@OferRaid It was their craft, but a lot of doctors and nurses were traumatized after so many soldiers under their care died during war.
I like these movies and yet, war itself is nothing glorious. War is horrible. But these movies, they are wonderful.
Arcaryon Xavier it’s a tv show
Obviously war IS glorious in some sense, but, as the sanctity, is the top of the mankind can achieve; this is not for everyone. The terrible and sublime walks together, as well as the valor and the terror.
Back in XIII, XIV and XV century war could be considered "glorious" in some way . Knights had a very strict code of honor, and battles where two christian armies clashed, were not that deadly. Knights preferred to take another noble hostage, than to kill him. Even though knights considered themselves superior to peasants and burgess, they would usually not kill man of lower status because they were fellow christians. This is where the cutting of two fingers from english archers started. They were captures, french could simply kill them, but they did't, because that was not noble (of course it is still a war, and people committed horrible crimes back then too). Back then wounds were not as serious as later, when you was hit with a arrow, you still had a chance to survive, musket round its a different thing, it was much more complicated, far beyond capabilities of then medicine. War changed, when it started to become more and more industrialized. There was no place for knight's in shining armors, heavy cavalry costed fortune and a barely trained peasant could kill a horseman in armor worth more than his village, with one lucky shot. War started to become a blood bath in renaissance, technology led to more and more deadly weapons, and that led to bigger armies. More and more people died on the battlefields, this reached its peak at WWI, when war became totally inhumane. There was a very short period in late medieval, when european warfare could be considered in some way romantic and glorious, during that time war was considered a trade of nobility and conscription armies were really rare, it all changed in XVI century.
Arcaryon Xavier
War is glorious
Pacifism has really been getting on my nerves reacently.
Moscow was not official capital at that time, she was big commercial culteral center of Russia like New Yerk in America. It was the stratigic decision to save army to regroupe it and to strike. General Washington did the same thing to save continental army during evacuation from New York
Moscow was the Capital of The Grand Principality of Muscovy, however, and remained so after the founding of the Tsardom of Russia. in the 15th century (1600's) Peter the Great fought a war against Carolus Rex of Sweden and captured Neva from the Swedes. He spent over a year fortifying the city and after the war moved his Capital to the City which he renames to St. Petersburg. It remained the Capital until after the Revolution in 1918ish. You also don't have 'second capitals', Moskva was just part of Russias power base, like Novgorod or Nzinzy Novgorod and taking the city would cripple the ability of Russia to field strong armies and Moskva was the home of Russia's great cannon foundries.
+Joseph And you ignored literally everything else I said. At the time if Napoleans conquests Moskva was an important city due to its manufactories. In a similar vein to Hull, the home of some of Englands largest Shipyards, or Oxford the centre of Education. It was a politically influential city BUT all the important stuff was decided in St Petersburg.
New York?!
Or New Yerk
Russia and culture ??? LOL
And it wasn't just the amputation-if you survived you'd go through about 6 months of extreme pain during healing and lucky if the doctors gave you an opiate for pain. Most of the time the stump was useless for prosthetics because speed was of the essence during amputation leaving a granulated bone stump sticking out. It wasn't until the American Civil War general anesthesia was in widespread use and the doctors could actually take the time to sew up a skin flap over the stump for a prosthetic. Still, 'laudable puss' was fully expected by the surgeons as a sign the body was healing. Clear, runny puss meant the infection had spread to the blood and you were doomed to die an extremely painful death.
jesus f christ
Yeah. People who say that they want to live in earlier times have no understanding of how primitive medicine was for most of human history.
@USERZ123 or some teas, tintures and and blends.
" It wasn't until the American Civil War general anesthesia was in widespread use " - Wrong, it was the Crimean War.
@USERZ123XD There wasn't antibiotics yet. It was Alexander Fleming who invented penicillin, the first antibiotic. Mr. Fleming was a devout Christian.
" i have many enemies , but no equals ! - napoleon bonaparte .
Thats what made him lose too many enemies
From every battle, the opposing generals learnt. His defeat was a question of time.
Fake news, you know this from total war, it is a fake news, he never Said that, unless you have a link to give that certified he said that
@@edouardlorge4059 I've never seen total war and napoleon was the greatest man God breathed life into !
@@chrismath149 his defeat was a question of superior numbers he had been beaten before Waterloo and even if he had won there were 250 000 austro-Russians on the march!
"Never have I felt so vile than standing victorious on a battlefield." - The King, from Sir John Falstaff
its from shakespere,s Henry v as repeated in the 2019 movie the king
Vile. No not the right word for this.
It is important to mention that the decision of saving the Guard saved “La grand Armée in the Berezina battle.
i would say the guard performed the greatest at the defense of krasnoi as they got there first and were allowing the rest of the army a safe passage, at the beresina, it was ney, oudinot and victor that performed the most
@@pancakemacbuttery9142the young guard to be specific
Sadly, there was no other way to fight for line infantry. They had to march into the battle in big formations with tight ranks unlike light infantry becouse of ineffectivity of their muskets.
Lord Alehandro Its becouse Polish legions were more experienced and most importantly they were volunteers, so their morale was higher, therefore maintaining order and discipline was easier for them.
Sander Vercammen Polish legionaries were kneeling or lieing when they were fired upon, not when were reloading.
Polski Ślachcic That was more for the cavalery this tactic form a big line of Musket and a charge of Cavalery will be easily destroyed ;) .
@@sreideur3506 Against cavalry infantry rather used square formation. A line would be easily outflanked by cavalry.
Polski Ślachcic At this time square formation was new and old tactique where not change and for a unit who was not in line form a square will be more longer ;P .
I love that this scene shows the horrors and cruelty of war despite all the bright and sharp uniformed lines in the field of "glory".
suffering is glory.
In real life the hero is not guaranteed to win in the end, not even Napoleon could withstand against the might of all the greatest nations in the world.
Napolean started 3 wars n murdered CV ount engine. He was hardly a hero. Murderer n tyrant yes hero no
@@zz424 Napoleon save France against 7 seven coalition of more powerfull country who wanted to end the Revolution and the spreading of democratic ideas, by instauring an empire and imposing his military genius, he saved France and the new ideas of liberty, equality, and fraternity.
@@flouy7430 vive l'empereur!
@@flouy7430 Napoleon did a lot of good, but he also did initiate The Peninsular War and the invasion of Russia (Tsar Alexander I is to blame though since he broke off the treaty). Both of which were his most disastrous conflicts.
@@thenablade858 but add up the coalition casualties of wars he didn’t start and they actually exceed those 2 he did start.
Not defending Napoleon from all guilt, he’s responsible for a lot of bad, I’m just blaming the coalition too. Both responsible for war deaths. But Napoleons got enduring reforms and a third of the world derived their legal system from Napoleonic code. Give me the self made emperor who reforms the law, over the throne inheriting monarchs who represent the old order
"The only thing worse than a battle lost, is a battle won."
-Duke of Wellington after the Battle of Waterloo
That is something he could afford to say. He was amongst the victors, after Waterloo. He could devolve time to that thinking.
Thank god we invented sedatives
now we need to end all war
The tactics of close formations was for the sake of effective control of troops, since officers could only depend on the range of their voice. This disconnect between tactics and the capabilities of weapons would only be solved by the advent of man-portable radios after WW1.
That was Kutuzov's genius, draw the Enemy in, burn what you don't need. Moscow was lost yes, Moscow was burnt yes, but Moscow could and was rebuilt.
It takes longer to recruit, train and equip a large Army, large enough to fight Napoleon in great land battles, what Kutuzov did was preserve a large part of the Russian Army for the incessant winter attacks Napoleon suffered on his great retreat. Russians, masters of winter fighting, Napoleon's elementary mistake, he forgot the winter.
Napoleon didn’t lose because of winter. He lost before. Dysentery and Typhus killed his Grande Armée. His soldiers became sick in Poland and died en masse even before reaching Smolensk.
@@walideg5304 it was him being cocky and leading to his own downfall after his unwell planned campaign to take moscow
@@walideg5304 it was him being cocky and leading to his own downfall after his unwell planned campaign to take moscow
@@walideg5304 Yep, and then the winter finished Napoleon's army off completely.
@@walideg5304 exactly the winter thing is such a myth at this point.
People be like don’t invade Russia in winter ! Napoleon left Paris in 1812 on the 24th June, that’s not winter.
It wasn’t russia back then but looking at Subutai and the mongols
Id say that winter is actually the best time to invade them
You never really understand life until you've had someone hold your hand when you feel death approaching.
He proved to be clever, Kutuzov - no feelings for "sacred cities" but a firm eye on the combat readiness of his forces.
He also 100% made the right decision and carried it too. It would have been challenged at the highest levels.
ONE firm eye. Not two.
"no feelings for "sacred cities" "
Do not be so quick to disregard symbols and morale. Losing such a city could be a devastating blow.
This version of War and Peace was great.
Sweden's Crown Prince, former Marshal Bernadotte, was offered command of all Russia's armies. Bernadotte declined for political reasons. But he had been giving Alexander I advice all through the Russian Campaign. He told Alexander, he cannot defeat Napoleon in pitched battles, you must trade time for space. Napoleon uses maneuver, wear him out in a futile chase deeper into Russia. Napoleon lives off the land, so scorch the Earth. Retreat until Napoleon is spread too thin, and then strike at his flanks. In the end, Napoleon's mandate rests on victory. Bernadotte told Alexander that he could lose every battle but win the war because he only needed to outlast the French to win and because of the depth of the loyalty of the Russian people.
At Waterloo the advancing French columns of 30 000 men was shot at point blank range with canister shot. And the bullets from the British field artillery would smash it's way through the ranks of 15 men before it ended in the chest of the 16th man. Imagine the red slaughter.
Thord
Yes glorious war was cruel and still is
Cannister shot does not travel far after it has hit something. They're more or less over-sized musketballs. A cannonball however, would go right through a formation. But not a "bullet?" What are you going on about, man! Talk some sense! And it wasn't British artillery but rather the Prussians flanking the French that would turn Waterloo into an Allied victory. And Wellington only had about 30,000 actual British troops, a third of his army. The rest was made up of Germans, Dutch and Belgians.
Wellington engaged Napoleon knowing the Prussians would arrive, in fact he sent a message informing them of his plan. It was not some miraculous arrival out of the blue. It was an Allied victory, but one orchestrated by Wellington with it's most critical moments decided by British soldiers. There is always people like you who try to downplay the British contribution.
There are all sorts of different views on what actually happened at Waterloo and who did what. Some historians believe the French were retreating before the Prussians even got there. But, who cares? The fact is Napoleon was a brilliant military leader and needed the cooperation of all of Europe to defeat him.
How does one fire a cannon from point blank range at massed infantry?
I mean... I just cannot see how you could place yourself in that position.
Borodino was the greatest massacre in history until the First Battle of the Somme in WWI.
the name of the movie is War and Peace filmed on the book after Leo Tolstoy
the song at the end is by Chesnokov, "we praise thee".
Wow they recreated the painting 'Council at Fili' that's amazing
Saving the Guard was a good decision. Later, at Krasnoï and Berezina, the Guard saved the Grande-Armée
War and peace from 1966 had a full episode devoted to borodino
"War and peace" chef-d'œuvre of Russian literature
не самая лучшая адаптаций книги "Война и мир' ну неплохо
Imagine your leg being sawed off, nothing to numb the pain, just so you had a coinflip chance of not also dying a slow painful death but instead living the rest of your life as a useless cripple if you are LUCKY. Oh and by the way, you are a million miles into Russia away from home, where it's turning into winter. Even a perfectly able-bodied healthy French officer who had his own horse had very little chance of making it back alive. Even Napoleon barely made it back.
If it were me on the table I ask for a prayer and a bullet.
And to make it even more sinister, the guy getting the amputation, that is Kuragin, yep, the one who ensnared and deluded Natasha, Bolkonsky's fiancée, in his absence just days before they would have actually rejoined, and also, btw., Pierre's (i.e., Bolkonsky's best friend) brother in law. ... Well. I wouldn't be surprised either. Gotta keep in mind, the original title is like "War and Mir", i.e. the Russian wordfor "peace", but also "world" and or "universe", while in German it's coming from "me" and/or "I" - no brain-twister here, actually.
"as a useless cripple"
Being minus one leg? Bad enough, but if you can still count on both complete arms, you can still do something.
Napoleon upon coming back from Russia, "Next time I'll get it right."
*Gets overrun at Leipzig*
Hogan really came a long way from being an engineer for lord wellington
Now that's soldering
Huh? Where is he?
Bloodiest Battle Of The Napoleonic War And perhaps the most important as it helped lead Napoleon deeper into mutha russia !
안녕하세요 Splendid님 ! 다름이 아니라 제가 '나폴레옹 전쟁'에 관한 영상을 만드려고 하는데 Splendid님께서 올려주신 이 영상들을 제 영상에 사용해도 될까요? 답변 기다리고 있겠습니다ㅎㅎ 늘 좋은 영상 올려주셔서 감사합니닿 :)
아, 도도도님! 저도 제작자님 영상 보며 공부 잘하고 있습니다. 이렇게 유명 유투버한테 연락 받으니 기분이 좋네요(!) 나폴레옹 전쟁 뿐만 아니라 어떤 영상이라도 부담갖지 마시고 제작에 필요하시다면 편하게 사용하셨으면 좋겠습니다.
흔쾌히 허락해주셔서 진심으로 감사드립니다 :) 늘 역사에 관련된 흥미로운 영상들을 올려주셔서 감사합니다. 재밌게 시청하고 있어요! ㅎㅎ 다음에 또 찾아뵙겠습니다 :)
혹시나 관련 영상 찾기 힘드실까봐 링크들 좀 정리해 봤습니다. 너무 옛날 클래식한 영화들이 많기는 한데... (워털루나 BBC 전쟁과 평화 같은 유명한 작품들은 뺐습니다.) ua-cam.com/video/b11dRiHfcLk/v-deo.html
반도 전쟁
ua-cam.com/video/Yj_sIMvFLCQ/v-deo.html
세인트헬레나 유배
ua-cam.com/video/5o5No-HQm7o/v-deo.html
나폴레옹 장례식 행렬
ua-cam.com/video/TZy_xV278L8/v-deo.html
아일라우 전투 (영화)
ua-cam.com/video/_ys46ocxx-M/v-deo.html
전쟁과 평화 (2007년작) -ep03까지
ua-cam.com/video/mRIb46yvHy0/v-deo.html
빈 회의
ua-cam.com/video/Oonn4ByxcD0/v-deo.html
보로디노 전투
ua-cam.com/video/2a8AsPfYuDQ/v-deo.html
독일 전역
ua-cam.com/video/DR52GRKYa3I/v-deo.html
러시아 전역 -ep03까지
헐!! 정리해주셔서 진심으로 감사드립니다 splendid님 ! 제가 마땅하게 보답해드릴 것이 없어 그저 죄송한 마음뿐입니다.. 정리해주신 영상들은 앞으로 제가 연재할 나폴레옹 전쟁 시리즈에 소중하게 사용하겠습니다. 다시 한 번 진심으로 감사드립니다. (__)
예엡 추가로 나폴레옹 전쟁 관련 영상물이 궁금하시면 언제든 알려주세용
"A general who cannot look onto a battlefield dry- eyed will allow many men to be killed uselessly."- Napoleon
And what was the usefulness of the Grande Armée? Napoléon is no Vauban
@@2adamast I'm not sure what you mean.
@@manilajohn0182 Before Borodino Napoleon is left with 1/4 of his army., after the battle 1/5 and still no good plan. Vauban is a top french general who cared about losses and avoided them
@@2adamast Ahh, I see what you mean. Vauban was certainly an outstanding general; there's no doubt about that. That said, I believe that the Emperor's point was that men die in war- and a good general can't allow himself to be swayed in his judgment by this fact.
War and peace is the name of the series. 👍🏻Enjoy
Neither of the two officers reporting to Napoleon at the beginning salute.
"Sniper Check"
Saluting is Not required for AdCs and messengers. Aids and Messengers were mostly junior officers, chosen for particular qualities, and exempted from common military courtesies while performing their Duties.
Think of it like you Don't salute the radio that is transmitting orders or reports 🤔
On en est donc arrivé là : des acteurs français parlant anglais pour jouer Napoléon et ses soldats !
En plus, Mathieu Kassovitz est très peu crédible en Napoléon...pourquoi pas Depardieu parlant russe...
Ah bon, Napoléon n'est pas un héros ?
Je vous met la définition :
"Celui qui se distingue par ses exploits ou un courage extraordinaire (dans le domaine des armes).
Mourir en héros.
synonymes : brave, héroïque"
Si Napoléon n'est pas le type même du héros je ne vois pas qui pourrait le surpasser, à part Alexandre ou César ?
Ceci dit, à quand Arielle Dombasle en Jeanne d'Arc et parlant anglais ?
Quand tu regarde tes filme à la tele/ciné, les voix sont en français non? Pourquoi les anglais n'auraient pas droit a leur doublage anglais? Puis je parie que t'es le premier a râler quand dans certains filme étranger diffusé en France ont les voix sont sous-titré au lieu de doublé.
Non mais on sen criss tu. Cest une production de television.
C'est une série anglaise, donc c'est compréhensible, après oui ils auraient pu tout simplement ajouter des sous titres je suis d'accord...
@@Ziberio65 Napoléon était certainement plus un héros que toi qui écris ce commentaire le cul posé sur ta chaise
You have to get into the minds of rich kids in order to understand why this man did not duck.
And what would that be? Did he actually want to die?
@@Briselance I forgot what this was all about. Two things come to mind. 1. Napoléon would have won Waterloo if not for two things: a. his obsession with the farm, and b. his refusal to give Marshall Ney his extra troops so he could force a rout. The other thing is that people of immense privilege think they are immune to adversity. Everything has always gone their way. In modern times we see this being played out in a baffling way with Trump and Harry, who cannot accept any form of loss or disobedience in their new roles. Especially, the English found it hard to conceive of the continental monkeys being able to harm them. Perhaps you recall the famous story of such a guy riding along with Wellington, commenting "Hey, I am hit" in utter astonishment. "So you are," was the answer. The rich kid could not believe this was possible. Wellington was more experienced and more a man of the world. Imagine having been surrounded by sycophants and obsequious servants all of your life (having fired anyone you didn't like). Many rich people fall into this trap.
@@charlesvanderhoog7056 thanks for the socialist psychobabble
I want permission to take some of your videos for editing! :)
why censored. im here for the gore
UA-cam would block the video.
The GDPYT Korea censores every knife and bullet wounds extra
There is alot more gore, theatrical and real to be found on youtube. Not sure why this is censored.
No, just demonetize I think.
1:20 horrific when he screams 😫😫😫
the subs on this are fantastic !
Difficult thing to do to a wounded man. You can see he felt awful for him.
1:22 Bro should be use anesthesia💀
Getting shot back then was far worse not only because of the caliber but the doctors too.
over 200 hundred years later and brits have all time pain in ass because of Napoleon
Out of all the Generals in the Russian Imperial Army the only one that had the BALLS to give that order (and BE OBEYED at the same time!) WAS KUTUZOV. He was the one that saved the Russian Army (or what remained of it after Borodino at least!) - even at the cost of leaving Moscow to Napoleon. HE was the one that - in fact - saved Russia during that fall and - especially - during the winter that was soon to come - strenghtening it, training it, supplying it and - at the end - that was the Army the Russians would carry straight into Paris. Ironically - he wouldn't even see the final victory of that Army, because he'd soon die - if I remember correctly - one or one and a half year after this.
It was still a close run thing. Napoleon had them on the ropes in 1813 and it was only because of the intervention of the Austrians that the Russians got to Paris. If Napoleon had accepted the Frankfurt proposal, he would've kept his empire.
@@matthewbadley5063 He was a damn fool for refusing to agree to Metternich's terms during the armistice of Plaswitz.
Actually the best one if you ask me is General Barkley
Honestly: Thank god we have peace. We should be grateful that we don't have to waste our lives for such barbaric nonsense.
The Dudelino Napoleon was Hitler of 19. century.
Aleksandar Trifunov wrong on many accounts.
97redbird You, Westerners are wrong on many accounts. Until the Renaissance you had nothing, you had fake history. Everything you have now is originally from East. From Eastern Roman Empire. Slavs and Arabs will conquer you soon. Napoleon was forerunner of fascists. Corsica will gain freedom soon. Bretagne too, Marseille will be the Capital of the Islamic Pijemont.
Aleksandar Trifunov well my ancestors are Slavic so what u saying?
Aleksandar Trifunov im also not french. My point is Napoleon and Hitler comparisons have run their limit, they are not the same character.
1:01
My teacher when a bee flies into our class
교실안에 벌들어왔을때 담임 선생님
다들 호들갑 떨때 혼자만 무념무상ㅋ
Interestingly Winston Churchill in his autobiography described the fallen in much the same way after he participated in the Battle of Omdurman. Lying not in heaps but spread out across the battlefield like a carpet of the dead.
That guy was Napoleon??? Talking about bad casting omg
Yeah, but I’m having trouble figuring out who would be a better Napoleon. They just cast the first French actor they saw.
Look up the 1970 movie "Waterloo" directed by Sergei Bondarchuk. Rod Steiger does a pretty convincing job as Napoleon.
@@sststr Also Napoleon mini series from 2002. Christian Clavier also did a very good job as Napoleon.
Dude you cut off the best part. 3:22 onwards is a reproduction of a famous painting 'Council at Fili' which this episode shows at the end of the scene.
수도 버리고 상대를 깊숙히 끌어들이는건 어휴 도박이었네요.
the capital was st petersburg
Let there be no doubt what surgery is: it's cutting and sewing, with occasional screws and bolts. The technology changes but the basic principle is still the same. Your body is just clothes and machinery for your brain.
That man was clever at the end. The only way Napoleon could justify such sacrifices and bloodshed was a historically significant victory against Russia with an ends justifies the means narrative. Nobody could attack the myth of Napoleon with Moscow successfully taken and a Russian surrender. But the myth and legend, that aura of invincibility, is shattered in a stalemate where time is Russia's friend. With each passing day from the French perspective, morale, dwindling supplies, disease, logistics, weather, the ever decreasing ability to fight further all plummet in a stalemate as you slowly bled out.
He did not waist his Imperial Guard (artillery did amazing work on standing Russians) and this is why he survived retreat from Moscow
He survived by deserting, just like in Egypt
Not enough bodies in the redoubt (Russian cannon position). That area had more dead than Omaha beach
At one time they use to build barns such as that , reason being is so the devil could not corner you .
War is a choice for the aggressor, and a necessity for the defender. "Pale Ebenezer thought it wrong to fight, but Roaring Bill, who killed him, thought it right." HILAIRE BELLOC
Soldiers marching in regimented closed ranks while cannon and musket shot tear holes in their perfectly ordered lines. No more than pieces on a chess board to be sacrificed for what they believe to be the greater good. May they all rest in peace.
He forgot to say "it's shameful sir!" like in the book.
Where was this filmed? Is there a reason for censoring out the blown off leg?
also his field Marshall's were some of the best, possibly in history.
This is south korea national broadcast service.
They have censored even a knife for young viewers
Also this is youtube. Some times you can find videos that aren't censored but the odds that they'll last a long time are slim to none.
it seems like alot of asian countrys censor out amputation, and severed limbs or heads. although I'm not sure why or if it's true.
Interesting that the surgery scenes were partially blanked out. When this BBC production was shown a few year ago it was considered that the British public wasn't so squeamish.
In Japan to be maimed or disfigured is considered shameful. Different broadcast standard. EDIT My bad, Korean. But still a different cultural broadcast standard to the UK.
I can watch a lot of carnage type things but that leg sawing ..... gives me the willies
Of all the great personages of History, only ONE individual has had more words written about him than Napoleon, and that is Jesus Christ.
The Napoleon on this version is the worst ever! Long hair, too slim (Napoleon in 1812 was rather chunky) and the bicorne is awful!
What is up with the blurred shots? What is wrong with UA-cam?
The music is bone chilling
LOL, Napoleon and his soldiers talking like their British arch-enemies.
Napoleon has some French accent but most of his aids in this show have British accents so does the Russians
@@AbrahamLincoln4almost like it could be a British show?
Here it is tried to show that Kutuzov made some kind of military strategic move - in fact the battle of Borodin happened because it was the last logical place to actually stand against Napoleon's army before his army reached Moscow, because all the time the Russian army was retreating and did not want to see eye to eye face to face with Napoleon's main forces, only fighting small battles with individual units of the opposing battalion. Kutuzov and the Russian army lost the Battle of Borodino, as the Russian army lost about 50,000 of its soldiers while Napoleon only lost about 35,000, although the Russian army had a numerical advantage at the Battle of Borodino - Russia had about 160,000 strong and Napoleon about 130,000.
Who's the guy talking about retreat at the end ? I want the actor's name, he sounds like Scholar Visari from Killzone.
So, EDIT : It is him. A scottish guy. I love his voice !
Dieu,le père de tous les français !La patrie est née à son sacre en 1804.Vive L’Empire !
Quite so....
이 절단씬은 정말 끔찍하다는 말로 밖에 표현이 안된다 어느 나라의 아가리 치킨호크들이 제발 좀 봤으면
"Naprzód psiekrwie, Cesarz patrzy!" ;)
I thought Saint-Petersburg was a russian capital then
@Majority Minority Correct, Saint-Petersburg was a russian Capital City back then. Do note, that the officer said "sacred capital", as that's pretty much how Moscow was referred to as. To Russians, Moscow'll always be THE Capital City, as that's where they founded it by the river Moskva. Thank goodness Moscow wasn't the Capital City at the time of Napoleon's war on Imperial Russia, as its loss would demoralize the Russians greatly. The Battle of Borodino would result in Imperial Russian Army marching on France and entering Paris in 1814, crushing his dreams of globalism.
And the poor Russian serfs would stay serfs for 50 more years ... finally the Romanov lost their heads when the Russian understood the shithole which was their country... but they created a monster with the USSR. A massive system to kill en masse
1:49 Why the hell is the leg censored???
Mr. Man Chinese law is stupid then.
well chinese does not show movies like this. And it korean censorship
You’ve clearly never seen Japanese midget amputee porn.
This is a South Korean upload, not Chinese.
Sexual content
If you like this then you HAVE to watch Bondarchuk's "War and peace" and "Waterloo".
What production is this?
Ok. This sold me on this film or series or whatever...
아 저게 그거구나 저때 제국 근위대를 투입했으면 피해가 훨씬 줄었을텐데
나폴레옹 입장에선 근위대 중대하나가 일반 보병연대들보다 귀하게 여겨지던 시절이라
@@user-PuRamen 머나먼 러시아땅에서 나폴레옹을 호위하는 목숨줄이나 다름 없어서 나폴레옹이 주저하다가 끝내 근위대 전선투입 거부함
Andrei: You won't.
Bomb: *sizzles*
Andrei: You won't.
Bomb: *sizzles*
Andrei: You won't.
Bomb: *BOOOOOM!!!!*
...
Andrei: You won't.
Kutuzov and Zhukov ... Thank you!
Zhukov is a terrible commander.
@@radziwill7193yes so terrible that he kicked Hitler's ass
@@Dushan88 Yes, alone. In the bar.
@@radziwill7193 I wonder what would you do if 4 million Nazis invade your country
@@Dushan88 It depends on what they want.
They blanked out the gory parts? Disappointing.
Early Age of Gunpowder to Age of Industrialization,,
imo, the worst era to wage war
Tight Infantry Formation, marching through thick consecutive fire and deadly artillery bombardment
instant dead on field is a bless,
than to visit field infirmary
Not exactly hygienic, that field hospital. They didn't know much about infections and sterilization in those days I see.
What movie is this? War and oracle?
War and peace
He lost the staring contest.
A certain Austrian corporal would make the same mistake over a century later.
What movie is that???
War and Peace 2016
How is the movie called?
What is this movie called?
Forget Napoleon's formulas. Focus on Tolstoy. What was a GIANT
whats its the name of this movie or serie ?
The price of glory. All the pretty uniforms were to be visible to commanding officers. And for commanding officers to be visible by the troops. To me the horror of Napoleonic age warfare was the indifference to the casualties by all sides. Modern warfare numbers with Middle Ages medicine. The Romans had better. And cleaner wounds.
Brian Cox is huge!
이때 프랑스군은 3~4만명, 러시아군은 4~5만명의 피해를 입었죠.