I haven't played this game in maybe 15 years, and every sound and sight is still so magical. Pure nostalgia... even seeing the tree of life simply wave its arms around reminds me abstractly of those care free times.
@@maruto789 yes because his micro was terrible. Didn't even waypoint the goblin factory to the peasants. It was also painful seeing him focus fire 3 peasants in the beginning to deep red but not kill them.
This is the difference between good and bad cheesers. The bad ones do it just for the absolute quickest wins and if the game goes slightly south, they instantly quit and queue up another in order to brute-force Elo through rapid coinflips. They ironically manage to turn unorthodox and out-of-the-box tactics into something boring and formulaic. The good ones on the other hand, stick through and let their creativity and quick thinking shine in the absurd scenarios that occur when both sides go off the beaten path, creating really interesting matches. This one is on the tamer side as far as your vids go but it still shows why you're so entertaining to watch. Keep it up
I remember it was like that in Command and Conquer Generals. I once hid a barracks in the side of the map and won with a single helicopter with upgraded machine gunners in it. Gotta think on the fly :)
"Tower Rusher gets counter attacked All-in my Base" : It would make more sense to write: "Tower Rusher gets counter attacked All-in his Base", cause you wrote Tower Rusher as if it wasn't you, so here "his Base" makes more grammatical sense than "my Base". Then the video was entertaining but you always have a fun trick otherwise and this was a pretty standard tower rush. But, gooo Poland!
Big thanks! Now I'm not a native English speaker but wouldn't it sound even better with "... attacked All-in in his base", it does make "in" being repeated twice but sounds more natural. I'm really sorry for not getting it right from the start, I'm a native Polish and Swedish speaker. 😀
You play like Roman; while Cathrage wanted a direct conflict Rome just sent their best general elsewhere ! I like this strategy castle vs army instead of army vs army. Also hero stategies saving money; 10 is better than seven. I am not talking about this video in particular
Can't you just issue an attack command by your militia/peasant against another unit of yours on the other side of the map, to make the creep AI prioritize an enemy building? Instead of sacrificing it? Or does "unit attacking a friendly" still get prioritized above "building under construction"? I'm not sure, but its a common AI trick for shrugging off aggro in other circumstances, and buildings under construction can't do it in response to you doing it Also orb casting with the firelord greatly improves his movement between attacks and attack range. Click the skill hotkey, attack, cancel the backswing and move, repeat. You can get in way more attacks than right clicking or just go a different hero in such circumstances. Firelord has 19.4 dps, 589 EHP, 550 range, +2 damage per consecutive attack. Naga has 20.1 dps, 561 EHP, 600 range, +5 damage and 30% slow. Alchemist is usually the king for rushing into combat as a level 1 hero since he can unload 4 acid bombs and right click between moving for huge damage compared to other melee heroes and has ridiculously high HP
my average apm is around 120 and my record is 155 also this is guard tower rush, and cannon rush in wc3 > cannon rush in sc2, we just have better cannon towers here :)
I haven't played this game in maybe 15 years, and every sound and sight is still so magical. Pure nostalgia... even seeing the tree of life simply wave its arms around reminds me abstractly of those care free times.
Wc3 was the best strategie game there is. I think im gonna play again when i see this
wrggg, no scuh thing as carex or etc
More videos please :)
That player had the right idea on how to deal with a tower rusher.
he still loss
@@maruto789 IDEA
He could have picked dark Ranger and get an expansion. Or even better creep a little and kill the 3 towers at his base.
@@maruto789 yes because his micro was terrible. Didn't even waypoint the goblin factory to the peasants. It was also painful seeing him focus fire 3 peasants in the beginning to deep red but not kill them.
Exactly. Focusing peasants = instant win. I'd have gone for beastmaster probably.
This is the difference between good and bad cheesers. The bad ones do it just for the absolute quickest wins and if the game goes slightly south, they instantly quit and queue up another in order to brute-force Elo through rapid coinflips. They ironically manage to turn unorthodox and out-of-the-box tactics into something boring and formulaic.
The good ones on the other hand, stick through and let their creativity and quick thinking shine in the absurd scenarios that occur when both sides go off the beaten path, creating really interesting matches. This one is on the tamer side as far as your vids go but it still shows why you're so entertaining to watch. Keep it up
very accurate. thats why i liked HAS and Parting in sc2
I remember it was like that in Command and Conquer Generals. I once hid a barracks in the side of the map and won with a single helicopter with upgraded machine gunners in it. Gotta think on the fly :)
Salty
This was a very interesting match? Nighttime almost got the best of him but he managed to hold on and fight through it
wrggg
"Tower Rusher gets counter attacked All-in my Base" : It would make more sense to write: "Tower Rusher gets counter attacked All-in his Base", cause you wrote Tower Rusher as if it wasn't you, so here "his Base" makes more grammatical sense than "my Base".
Then the video was entertaining but you always have a fun trick otherwise and this was a pretty standard tower rush. But, gooo Poland!
we understand your grammar remark
@@annoyingwarcraft3 Thanks for answer! I have watched all your videos, Likes on all and some on my Favorite list! Shared your channel on Facebook too!
@@jarekvoice08legend Big thank you! As a token of appreciation of such amazing fan I have complied with your title suggestion and changed it
Big thanks! Now I'm not a native English speaker but wouldn't it sound even better with "... attacked All-in in his base", it does make "in" being repeated twice but sounds more natural. I'm really sorry for not getting it right from the start, I'm a native Polish and Swedish speaker. 😀
@@xikens But that doesn't sound right either, it would sound better as "gets his base attacked". 🙂
Good and funny player. Pls more.
2:36 "Bewere I live" I love the Sinistar reference
i love tower rush videos!
This could’ve been much easier if you had built at least one tower on your base. But gg 💁🏻♂️
He's fucking alive!!!
Love these
Нормальная такая контрака кста. Я просто в хлам потерялся. Думаю, он мог бы продавить. Яиц не хватило)
Так надеялся что оппонент победит, надоели уже выкладывать одни победы. Хочется посмотреть и на зосерыши
Couldnt the other player just build production building and push him out?
or walk to another gold mine with the tree?
I'm new to your channel! Great content! :)
Glad to see your videos in my subscription :)
nice attempt of the opponent
You play like Roman; while Cathrage wanted a direct conflict Rome just sent their best general elsewhere ! I like this strategy castle vs army instead of army vs army. Also hero stategies saving money; 10 is better than seven. I am not talking about this video in particular
Love your videos chuddy
Oh man, so nostalgic
good
Наконец-то новое видео)
Lol thats what i did back in the days when i was playing local. Golden days
Tight!!!
:D
i was watching ur videos again today xD
what a coincidence
Nice vídeos
Gretings from spain
Good opponent! N1 match! Rly King!
noobs. transplant a tree of life...
Is this game good now?
Wc3 was never bad
I bet this is going to be annoying :D
Can't you just issue an attack command by your militia/peasant against another unit of yours on the other side of the map, to make the creep AI prioritize an enemy building? Instead of sacrificing it? Or does "unit attacking a friendly" still get prioritized above "building under construction"? I'm not sure, but its a common AI trick for shrugging off aggro in other circumstances, and buildings under construction can't do it in response to you doing it
Also orb casting with the firelord greatly improves his movement between attacks and attack range. Click the skill hotkey, attack, cancel the backswing and move, repeat. You can get in way more attacks than right clicking
or just go a different hero in such circumstances. Firelord has 19.4 dps, 589 EHP, 550 range, +2 damage per consecutive attack. Naga has 20.1 dps, 561 EHP, 600 range, +5 damage and 30% slow. Alchemist is usually the king for rushing into combat as a level 1 hero since he can unload 4 acid bombs and right click between moving for huge damage compared to other melee heroes and has ridiculously high HP
i prefer ranged in such situations, i don't think there is a good choice of ranged tavern hero here, and Naga has lower movespeed
Do you stream somewhere?
One of the best video
Chubby u are insane.
tower rush content best
I'm pro player of sc2 and u guys are playing with 10 apm? A canon rush requires 150 as minimum lol
my average apm is around 120 and my record is 155
also this is guard tower rush, and cannon rush in wc3 > cannon rush in sc2, we just have better cannon towers here :)
@@annoyingwarcraft3 lol, really good game bro, I was joking
$hit was intense!
pls more towerrush videos😊
Legend!
👍
Enjoyable but omg poor mechanical skill.
Nice troll :-)
Good stuff) if the counter attacker built an aow next to your base - it would surely be over for ya. Also he didn't use his aow to attack your towers.
Noobs