The pope would not agree with his interpretation of what is a civilian. Are you sure you're a Catholic. I follow the church, and I don't believe in this genocide. Part of his argument about Germany is misleading. Woodrow Wilson said not to punish Germans severely. Germans were crippled financially. And this rabbi is chuckling at carpet bombing of Germans. That's not church teachings. This is ancient Old Testament, Babylonian, Mesopatamian thinking. Jesus didn't follow that logic.
One of the Israeli soldiers who was just killed said, "if I die protecting my people, it will be a blessing. If i were to fall captive, I forbid anybody from releasing any terrorist or from endangering any Jewish life to release me."
How about 3 Israeli hostages carrying a white flag and screaming in hebrew who were just killed by IDF? This is what you get with your blind indoctrination, killing even your own people in blind rage, let alone Palestinian women and children.
@@jodybellon4206 perhaps the icc and icj should consult with this scumbag "rabbi" also. He belongs in the Hague with his war criminal peers. This monster is an embarrassment to jewish people as a whole and a dangerous fascist.
Sim ainda existe pessoas que apoiam o Diabo se o Mundo nao fosse assim nem teria existido o sofrimento do Guetto da Varsovia e Estalingrado Uma vergonha para uma velha que viveu no Estado Fascista racista de Apartheid na Africa do sul mentalidade da serpente extremista religiosa da Sinagoga do Satanas pessoas de Deus tem amor com os outros
Hi Guys, I'm a British Christian Ashkenazi Jew on My Mother's Father's side of the Family, to which, I Sadly don't have any Connection to My German Jewish Roots, Family, Customs or Traditions, because of the Persecution of the NAZIS, My Grandfather had to Flee Poland in 39 & managed to Escape the Genocideal Slaughter of His People & He Managed to safely Arrive in Britain in 42, to Stand & Fight Hitler & His Goons for the British. So Sadly I have no understanding of Hebrew or Yiddish, so a lot of the Jewish Words that the Rabbi used, just went straight over My Head because of the Lack of Understanding in My Peoples Language but what I did Understand was very Wise & Valuable, so Thank You, My Brothers. Great Video. GOD Bless You Both, Praise & Glory be to GOD in the Name of the Holy Spirit & our Lord, King & Saviour the Massiah, Amen.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00 International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces. Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41. No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33] *_Highlights:_* When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17] In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12] Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
Thank you for having Rabbi Friedman. His analysis, perspective, left me in awe. Of course! It's logical ; it makes sense!! Am Yisrael Chai! Dear Chosen People, shout it from the rooftops.
Trying to understand both sides here, but the comments at 10:25, “ And even the babies…Somebody has to identify the babies as non-militant” is where I check out. Good luck with all this..
Oh thank God.. Shukralhamdulillah.. Reading the comments were beginning to horrify and disappoint me even more than the sadistic perversion of the holy by someone who so smugly claims to represent Him. And I can assure you one thing. He sees what they do. And unlike some.. Who know not what they do. This vile bunch know exactly what they're doing. He Sees. And He Knows. And there is no escape from Him.
You guys must be absolutely out of your minds if you think that these people should not defend themselves and the Country after literally being the victim of the most horrific and barbaric mass crimes against humanity ever committed. I’ve seen the photos, videos and testimony on the ‘Hamas massacre’ website and if any person on Earth is in denial or ok with that.. Then they are not only on the totally wrong side of history… But I am truly concerned about the fact that I live on the same Planet as those people. The world has well and truly gone totally mad.
The real enemy is inside of you and it happens outside of you cause your heart is not pure. Listen to this The Courage to Confront Evil: The Most Important Challenge of Our Time Audio
There is no common sense in this. The Bible has great truth. The greatest truth is it's full of satanic lies and the world needs to except that as truth . And not disregard the truth that is in Jesus .That these people denied and had put to death...
Thank you meaningful people for interviewing Rabbi Manis Friedman! He brings such clarity and meaning to our current issues within daas Torah! Yasher koach!
So much meaning you that even within 6 minutes, when talking about too many palestinian civilians dying, he can't help himself he chuckles. This is the man that represents your faith? so sad
It’s war -unfortunately it happens, especially with the tactics used by Hamas. As retired Marine, I assure you that no one takes pleasure in that fact, but it does happen. The Rabbi’s cynicism is justified if you listen and dig in to the history of the region.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00 International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces. Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41. No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33] *_Highlights:_* When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17] In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12] Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
Zionism is not sanctoned by GOD is it? Where in the Torah does it say follow the ways of an atheist? Where does it say in the Torah, GO CREATE A STATE designed by an atheist who sanction murder, theft, idoltry WHERE? Zionist rabbis are peddling lies.
Deus nunca está ao lado do Genocidio e mentira Deus nunca estava ao lado do Hitler Deus está sempre ao lado de vitimas os oprimidos Deus e amor quem mata não tem nada com Deus
Thank you. This was very clear and informative. Thank you to the Rabbi for expressing his knowledge, experience, and common sense on the subject of inheritance. ❤
unbelievable that the host refers to the palestinians just as 'arabs' within the first 7 or so mins. Already trotting out the same sort of stereotypes that would get you called antisemetic the other way round, love it.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00 International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces. Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41. No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33] *_Highlights:_* When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17] In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law. Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME. 8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
Rabbi Manis Friedmann is a wise man a little knowledge is very dangerous to one who does not understand what knowledge is. This podcast is true enlightment
Thank you, Rabbi! I made Aliyah almost 36 years ago, from Philly. I am a retired Critical Care Nurse Specialist. I retired 4 years ago. I worked in the Hadassah Ein Kerem ER during the 1st Intifada. Over those 36 years, I have come to the same conclusions that you teach us, are in the Torah all along. Even though I know that we never stop learning, I still wish that I heard you teaching this at least 35 years ago. It would have eased my heart through those years.
@debesele Condolences to you, who doesn't know the definitions of Apartheid and Genocide. You can't have Apartheid if the minority in question has the same rights as the majority, and enjoys the exact same salary for the exact same professions and schooling as the majority. Genocide can only occur after the annihilation of the majority of the population in question The so called Palestinians have quadrupled the size of their population, therefore...NO GENOCIDE. You throw around words that have nothing to do with reality. Hamas, Hezbullah, Iran and the Palestinian Authority all have in their Charters the intent of committing GENOCIDE against all Jews. They already perpetrate APARTHEID in the areas that they control. NO JEWS ALLOWED, and PAY FOR SLAY against Jewish civilians.
It must have been very tough as an ER doctor in the first intifada. Not so much at the beginning, when it was only peaceful protests. But once some Idf scumbags murdered a few of the people they hate. Then your emergency room must have been inundated with owies and boo-boos from the relentless rock throwing Palestinian "combatant" prepubescent children "terrorists". Truly. It must have been a horrible time for you. Are you okay? What inspiring strength. Wow.
14:42 - Proportionallity; True Peace! 24:14 - Two enemies Ismael and Yaacov 29:46 - What Israel offered and was refused | Family feud 34:55 - poignant, that the festival was a spiritually placed aversion to a greater evil that could have occured... Woow that's mind blowing... that a glory (kavod) can be the part of the precipitation of an Evil, yet be the Evil's aversion from being more detrimental.... #SeedsThatDieDoLive 38:22 - You got a big point there Rabbi...Israel's to Stand Stong On the Promised Covenant. 45:05 -"bullies only pick on people that appear weak!" #qotd 50:43 - Atheist Jewish; say's he doesn't believe; she says, whether you believe it or not, we know it's true.... 52:28 -Oh you don't know that they're chosen? 55:07 -
How sad to use the beautiful Tora the words from God, to change it and use it as a weapon or license to kill indiscriminately civilians 🤬 shame on you !
I'm listening to this from Australia. Since this war began on Oct7th Ive wondered if Im the only person onbearth that thinks the way ao do about war, peace, who is your enemy, what is true victory, the death of civilians and the stupidity of encouraging an enemy to hide behind them. (In this situation in particular because the civilians voted Hamas in in 2006 and by far the great majority still suppirt them in full). Imagine my relief when I heard Rabi Manis Friedman tell it like it is. Thank you Rabi, I'm not the mean horrible, nasty person many think I am. Im a realist. I love Israel, all of it belongs to the Jewish poeople and to those they invite to live with them. All of Gaza and the Westbank have long abused the position allowed them and it's time Israel claimed and conqured all that was promised them by God. Every inch of it. That includes ALL of Jerulalem, Israels capitol. And please Israel, get those abominations off Mt Mariah.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00 International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces. Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41. No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33] *_Highlights:_* When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17] In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12] Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
God commanded the Israelites to not end the exile until a Messiah calls them back. Zionism disobeyed God. Your entire beliefs are deception from the Synagogue of Satan. If the Jews had obeyed God, there would be no bloodshed and they would have been given land in an honorable way…. Not like liars and murderers which exactly what the Synagogue of Satan are.
@@darrene.vonbraun4421 You describe the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, we're by civilians who do not take a direct part and hostilities are included it in the category of non-combatants. I posit that when you intentionally allow combatants to harbor themselves within your midst, you are participating in an attack and in combat. You cannot have combatants harboring in a hospital, and this information is widely known by those in the hospital that they are standing in front of combatants and say those are civilians. Those are plain closed. Combatants. You are the one who is shameful, shame shame.
have you heard of the great march of return? breaks what this guy said about civilians. when they tried to not be a threat and leave they were killed while in non violent protest
@@miks48 wow crazy, so you're telling me they tried peaceful resistance, were killed brutally 200+ of them. So they were taught once again, peaceful resistance doesn't work?
Guys your podcasts are brilliant... Facts ... My prayers for you guys ...also for your guest the Rabbia he's brilliant PASS MY WARM REGARDS TO HIM PLEASE 🎉.." in war no one is safe" IDF are doing a brilliant job to defend all all across the world 👏 With Prayers and Best Wishes to all my Jewish Brothers and Sisters 🎉 Proud of u all guys ... British Indian SIKH stand by you all... Long live Israel 🇮🇱 💙
Great interview. Thank you, Rabbi Friedman and hosts. I am Christian and did not know much about the Jewish religion, but listening provided me clarity about alot of things. The war and how to think about life in general. God Bless all three of you and your loved loves. I am American and I stand with Isreal. She will remain strong and alwsys undefeated. As i tell others, "Don't worry God and Jesus will take care of you. He will always have your back." Gentleman, that is so very true. Keep your faith and don't live in doubt. Keep you eyes on the Lord and he will not fail you. Live in Thanksgiving when life becomes difficult. I wish you and all your loved ones and Isreal Happy Hanukkah. I would love to hear from Rabbi Friedman again. He is so very wise and a true gentleman. Isreal is always in my prayers and "breath prayers" through out my day. ✝️🇮🇱🙏🇱🇷.
What did these people do against Jésus and his mother ? Did they believe him ? Or did they want to murder him ? where does the presumed love lie in this relationship ? Who lied ?
ha ha, I fell asleep listening to a debate by Ben Shapiro and this video came on autoplay while I was asleep. I dreamed an old Jewish man came to my outside concert and we sat in a tent and discussed Judaism and the response to Hamas and how it's always been. I woke up and this was on. Huh. He looks just like he did in my dream. ha ha! I'm halfway along and so far, nothing he said in the dream is like what he's saying in real life. In fact, some statements are the opposite. But I like his perspective and his vibe. It's meant to be entirely reasonable, not emotion-based, not inflammatory, just reason. I'd much rather listen to this than all the Palestinian yelling and hissy-fitting.
“The whole issue is inheritance.” I am Christian and we have always known that this is historical truth… nothing will be good enough for them as long as one Jewish child remains alive. We pray for the peace and protection of Israel.
You do know that for centuries, though, Muslims and Jews lived side by side. And guess where huge numbers of Sephardic Jews went to when they fled Spain? Turkey, Syria, Palestine. The Jewish population was very tiny in Palestine in the 1400s until the Sephardic Jews filled their ranks. The Jews, Christians, and Muslims were neighbors without much incident back then. It was when Zionism emerged in the 20th century that things unraveled. The way Jews and Muslims and the Christians think is based on the politics of the 20th century. It's not how the people thought in the 1800s. An envoy of Rabbi Sonnenfeld who wanted coexistence with Muslims and Christians was shot to death by Zionists. The rabbi grew up with Muslims and liked them.
Rabbi sonnenfeld died from illness that he had for 3 months prior. he died in 1938. ten years before israel. not sure where you got this idea he was shot by zionists? @@QUINTUSMAXIMUS
@@QUINTUSMAXIMUS never ever Jews lived in peace among Muslims. they lived as dhimmis, as second class subjects, who were constantly robbed, subjected to all kinds of humiliation, and periodically raped and slaughtered en masse. stop spreading this BS. at least not on Jewish channels. we know our history and you only embarrassing yourself. go away!
I have been making this point ad nauseam since this war started. Namely why is it that when Arab countries don’t use human shields with each other? Because it wouldn’t be effective. It would have no effect on strategy at all. life does not mean much to them”.
This was great. Regarding showing strength: at recent pro Hamas rallies in both NZ and Australia, local Maoris, Christians, arrived before them and performed the haka. This is a ceremonial dance performed by Maori warriors to intimidate their enemies and to give courage to the warriors. (You will always see it performed by New Zealand players prior to international football games.) The pro Hamas supporters were very intimidated. Anyone would be because Maoris are big boys.
Excellent. Voice of truth, clarity... We as Jewish people are so busy trying to make the world happy and always sound like we are "so nice" that we are digging our own grave.. there is a Torah that's the guideline... We are not smarter, more merciful or kinder than g.d and is time to stop pretending we know everything.. to be humble and follow the very clear guidelines the Torah is giving us! And stop excusing ourselves by doing the right thing!!!
So weird how jewish people can decide that ‘no longer being nice’ means going full on third reich. I guess that’s what happens when you’re too busy trying to be white european and no actually jewish.
@@revolutionarydragon1123they can't be isolated, world need Jews more than Jews need the world,most of invention in science and technology are mostly done by them ,they are the chosen people, and they are the most wealthiest people in the world
One of the greatest minds of our times, Rabbi Manis must be a spokesperson for Israel. PLEASE CONSIDER THIS. You see what is happening on the PR front. This is being sent from Eretz Yisrael as a call to serve.
❤🇮🇱 "And again, the Lord has said that: Ye shall defend your families even unto bloodshed. Therefore for this cause were the Nephites contending with the Lamanites, to defend themselves, and their families, and their lands, their country, and their rights, and their religion." "the Nephites were inspired by a better cause, for they were not fighting for monarchy nor power but they were fighting for their homes and their liberties, their wives and their children, and their all, yea, for their rites of worship and their church." "And they were doing that which they felt was the duty which they owed to their God; for the Lord had said unto them, and also unto their fathers, that: Inasmuch as ye are not guilty of the first offense, neither the second, ye shall not suffer yourselves to be slain by the hands of your enemies." - Alma 43:45-47 Check out the whole chapter of Alma 43 for some amazingly clear parallels to Israel & Hamas in the Nephites & Lamanites. It adds moral clarity in a morally sick and confused world.
As far as "common sense," besides being an oxymoron within itself, it's also a logical fallacy. When people use this phrase, they are admitting to two things: they have no idea what they're talking about, and they have no interest in gaining an idea. At best, people's "common sense" ideas are woeful oversimplifications, but more often than not, they are dumpster fires of hot-takes that say more about the self-righteous ignorance of the speaker than about anything meaningful. The only thing dumber than the degenerate who argues "common sense" is the is the absolute waste of protoplasm that agrees with them. _"Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before you reach eighteen."_ *-Lincoln Barnett The Universe and Dr Einstein (1950 ed.)*
Rambam in the 13th century said that killing Amalek is no longer valid as one can no longer recognize who is Amalek, they have been assimilated, traveled etc. So colonialists take verses out of context and use it whenever they like and when it is conventient for them!
First of all, thank you Rabbi Friedman for helping to m'kariv my husband in NMB about 15 years ago. Here is my question: how do you reconcile your understanding that we already deserve moshiach with what the Chafetz Chaim said "Each generation in which the Temple wasn't rebuilt it's as if it was destroyed anew"? I'm guessing there is another way to understand his statement but most people seem to use that statement as evidence that it is because of our subpar actions that the temple has not been rebuilt.
He reminds me so much of my Papa ❤ Calm, wisdom, stability, strength. That which has built up this modern society is what we need. Yet we’re allowing the comfort it created to cause its demise.
As Jews, you go to the Torah as a Muslim, they go to the Quran, and the Christians go to their Bible. The unfortunate thing is if you have humanity, you don’t need a religious book to tell you how to treat people the whole point of these religions is supposed to be love- and instead you use your ‘holy books’ and dogma to justify oppression and murder of each other. Thank God I don’t follow any of those religions, And so I am free to follow the Divine Master who is LOVE. Peace on Earth, good will to ALL.
Look at what the quran says about war and peace treatieses... It says that if you make a peace treaty with someone, then abide by it and deal with them fairly. However if they breach the treaty, then you have to fight them until they can't raise arms again... Soo... Hamas broke the ceasefire... Quran says Israel has to vanquish hamas.. Allah and His prophet (peace be upon him) support Israels right to exist and defend itself.
Israel did , Israel always broke the ceasefire but no one mentions that , a few days prior they shot protesters at the border because they were protesting the inhuman treatment of Israel, since January until Oct 7th they killed nearly 300 Palestinians, name 300 people that you know? These people are not just numbers! Of course not to start with all the children and women Israel abducted.
Sounds good. However it says you can lie to advance your aims… for example, agree to a ceasefire or a two-state solution knowing you’re just using it to gain advantage for an attack later.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00 International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces. Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians. State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41. No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33] *_Highlights:_* When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17] In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12] Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
Id like to point out that the remark that R Manis said regarding "unconditional love" does NOT contradict the whole premise that you spoke about with Sonny Pearlman when Nesanel speaks about Giving addicts unconditional love that means actually demonstrating that not just saying it and that's what the Rabbi is calling out people who are just told that there "loved" but don't FEEL loved
In the turkisch parliment a man was screaming and made treats to the israeli soldiers and that Allah will make them suffer. One minute later he fell down in heart failure and died imeditly. He shouldnt have treatened, Gods choisen people.
1:19 Send out a search party for the logic in the arguments of this rabbi, who specializes in declaring other people's ideas absurd. His various assertions, all delivered with absolute certainty and complacency, are embarrassing. No, I am not pro-Hamas. I'm a Jew on the side of fellow humans, whatever their background, and in particular the innocent ones.
I wish you would ask Rabbi Friedman what about the fact that Hashem threw us out of Eretz Yisrael due to our sins, and He has not yet sent Moshiach yet to redeem us. I'm not disputing our obligation to defend ourselves, I just wish someone would reconcile these two facts.
I relate so much to this. As a someone who has been through a lot of suffering and abuse since I was a child the bit about having confidence I claim what’s yours really spoke to me.
which bit did you like especially? When he justified collective punishment because they didn't 'surrender'? How are 2.2 million people supposed to surrender? what would that even look like? He's talking complete bullshit, they've already displaced 1.8 MILLION people what does he want? them to peacefully walk towards the boarder? they did that and got shot down, 200 of them in the great march of return. This is where the issue is, the palestinians aren't civilians because they can't possibly differentiate between the 'terrorists' and the children, so they just bomb all 2.2million of them and hope? Thats what this guy is justifying and you go "yep I had alot of abuse in my life and suffering so him justifying the suffering of 20 thousand people dying with no way to escape, that really struck a cord with me that genocide denial."
@MeaningfulPeople @Niche.... First time seeing you. Just wanting to say that the way you present is outstanding. Simple outstanding. You could easily have your own show on CBN. And more importantly bro, you do it in a beautiful way as to be " a light to nations". Well done oh son of Hashem. Shalom
One of the major issues in other countries is the inability to for so many people that there is an inability to differentiate between Palestinians and Hamas. Are we doing the same thing in this discussion? Is it possible that we are in a unique place right now where we have more support and a different relationship with some of our neighbors in the Middle East, than we previously had, and that there is a process of peace that we may be able to achieve with the support of both Jews and Palestinians? What if Hamas can be eliminated by taking their power away and Palestinians are willing to accept a governing body that actually acts in their best interests. Do you think they would accept a new leadership? Do you believe that Netayahu has not empowered Hamas? We have 2 traumatized nations that want to feel safe.
Hey thank you very much for this enlightening conversation and insights. This helps all Jews get keys and be prepared for the spiritual front which is all part of this war. Though as a diaspora Jew there are some Hebrew terms which I don’t get. It would be nice to have clear translations or explanations in a box. Thank you for your work !
@@rivkaestherkletski4184 are you talking about killing, raping, abducting in the name of allah ? Do you expect Jews to wait to be butchered again and again ?
Jews should be the most confident ppl in the world. In spite of 3000 plus years of persecution you all are still most prominent and are a living proof of the existence of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
The discussion of Eisav/hunter/trophy seeker vs. Yishmael/inheritance/rightful owner was gevaldig!! It made me wonder, however, what was 'the deal" with the Crusades? Why did "Eisav" seek to conquer "Yishmael" (and why did so many communities of Yidden have to suffer because they were in the path? How does this episode of history fit into the paradigm?
Crusades were an answer to Muslim conquer of the Holy Land, desecration of Holy Sites and cruel persecution of Christians living in the Eastern Roman Empire area and Middle East. unless the Crusades (and believe me, as a Jew, I have my own grievances at crusaders who didn’t differentiate between Muslim invaders and peaceful Jews ) and the Reconquista, you would be a Muslim today and most probably won’t have the life standard and technology you are enjoying now, because Crusades were the force that stopped the advancement of the Islamic Chaliphate to the West on their way to their ultimate goal of global domination.
This is the best episode ever! I just don’t understand when we all have to feel a certain way like won’t we always have people who don’t feel a way .. like what is it like majority or really everyone has to believe ?
Christ Jesus Is Our PEACE In This Troubled World.Only Thru HIM We Can Have Peace (Romans 16:20) "The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you."
@@voiceInDetroitYou missed the point. He didn't justify the statue or the profaning of the holy day; he merely said that the Jew dances on Simchat Torah. Even the Jew farthest away from Torah retains a spark of holiness, no matter how deeply it is buried.
Catholic here. I trust this Rabbi. His wisdom is biblical.
There's another rabbi I think you'd benefit from as well. Tovia Singer, right here on UA-cam. ❤
@@SeekingToServe i'VE watched a few of his videos. He is a bit anti-Catholic/Orthodox, for my taste.
@@SeekingToServeone for Israel here on UA-cam
The pope would not agree with his interpretation of what is a civilian. Are you sure you're a Catholic. I follow the church, and I don't believe in this genocide. Part of his argument about Germany is misleading. Woodrow Wilson said not to punish Germans severely. Germans were crippled financially. And this rabbi is chuckling at carpet bombing of Germans. That's not church teachings. This is ancient Old Testament, Babylonian, Mesopatamian thinking. Jesus didn't follow that logic.
@@SeekingToServeRabbi Yoel Gold - I really like him!
One of the Israeli soldiers who was just killed said, "if I die protecting my people, it will be a blessing. If i were to fall captive, I forbid anybody from releasing any terrorist or from endangering any Jewish life to release me."
He’s wise. The current Israeli government is stupid.
Your Soul is safe with God now, God Bless 🙏❤️
Condolences and prayers for his family and friends. May his memory always be a blessing. 🙏
Outsiders and BABBLERS should be ignored and told they've never been to Gaza frontline in the war
How about 3 Israeli hostages carrying a white flag and screaming in hebrew who were just killed by IDF? This is what you get with your blind indoctrination, killing even your own people in blind rage, let alone Palestinian women and children.
Perhaps the IDF should consut with Rabbi Friedman
I think the IDF gets it. Biden's handlers need to watch, learn and study.
So should the Commander in Chief rool
The IDF is conducting its genocide just fine without the rabbi.
@@jodybellon4206 perhaps the icc and icj should consult with this scumbag "rabbi" also. He belongs in the Hague with his war criminal peers. This monster is an embarrassment to jewish people as a whole and a dangerous fascist.
This was amazing I stand with Israel and try and educate everyone I know 🇮🇱🇮🇱
You cannot educate people with poison.
I just checked out because this Rabbi doesnt seem to have any sensible answers but just the same racist apartheid outlook.
Ikƙ
sophia, no one gives a shyte...
@@jakpanana3938exactly!
He is a bloodthirsty bigot.
Watching your show from South Africa. I am a Christian, and I support the Chosen people. Amen
Because ignorant are everywhere God has no time to spend with rotten human beings
😂😂😂😂
Chosen garbage 😅😅😅😅. Did u have a chance to see how this chosen garbage are traiting christian ?!!!! Get informed
Yes, now it's time for all Arabs to recognize,so the whole world will be blessed and in peace.🙏👍
Sim ainda existe pessoas que apoiam o Diabo se o Mundo nao fosse assim nem teria existido o sofrimento do Guetto da Varsovia e Estalingrado
Uma vergonha para uma velha que viveu no Estado Fascista racista de Apartheid na Africa do sul mentalidade da serpente extremista religiosa da Sinagoga do Satanas pessoas de Deus tem amor com os outros
Hi Guys, I'm a British Christian Ashkenazi Jew on My Mother's Father's side of the Family, to which, I Sadly don't have any Connection to My German Jewish Roots, Family, Customs or Traditions, because of the Persecution of the NAZIS, My Grandfather had to Flee Poland in 39 & managed to Escape the Genocideal Slaughter of His People & He Managed to safely Arrive in Britain in 42, to Stand & Fight Hitler & His Goons for the British. So Sadly I have no understanding of Hebrew or Yiddish, so a lot of the Jewish Words that the Rabbi used, just went straight over My Head because of the Lack of Understanding in My Peoples Language but what I did Understand was very Wise & Valuable, so Thank You, My Brothers. Great Video. GOD Bless You Both, Praise & Glory be to GOD in the Name of the Holy Spirit & our Lord, King & Saviour the Massiah, Amen.
You can't be Christian amd a jew they are incompatible. Zionist maybe but Christian never.
Dude, what? The English words he used made him out to be worse than any nazi who did gleeful double shifts, ushering people into the ovens.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
Thank you for having Rabbi Friedman. His analysis, perspective, left me in awe. Of course! It's logical ; it makes sense!! Am Yisrael Chai! Dear Chosen People, shout it from the rooftops.
Trying to understand both sides here, but the comments at 10:25, “ And even the babies…Somebody has to identify the babies as non-militant” is where I check out. Good luck with all this..
Indeed. Goes to show no matter how well-spoken someone is, that doesn't mean that that person has anything intelligent to say.
I am actually shocked 😨😱 on the take but the comments seem to treat like he said something enlightening.
Totally agree, MY eyebrows went up and moving on
Oh thank God.. Shukralhamdulillah.. Reading the comments were beginning to horrify and disappoint me even more than the sadistic perversion of the holy by someone who so smugly claims to represent Him.
And I can assure you one thing.
He sees what they do.
And unlike some.. Who know not what they do. This vile bunch know exactly what they're doing.
He Sees. And He Knows.
And there is no escape from Him.
You guys must be absolutely out of your minds if you think that these people should not defend themselves and the Country after literally being the victim of the most horrific and barbaric mass crimes against humanity ever committed.
I’ve seen the photos, videos and testimony on the ‘Hamas massacre’ website and if any person on Earth is in denial or ok with that.. Then they are not only on the totally wrong side of history… But I am truly concerned about the fact that I live on the same Planet as those people.
The world has well and truly gone totally mad.
So much of my despair has been lifted after listening to this brilliant man. Wonderful human being.
We definitely need a lot of prayer.
The real enemy is inside of you and it happens outside of you cause your heart is not pure. Listen to this
The Courage to Confront Evil: The Most Important Challenge of Our Time Audio
Rabi’s sarcasm is warranted and efficient to bring a measure of common sense into this madness
Absolutely.
There is no common sense in this. The Bible has great truth. The greatest truth is it's full of satanic lies and the world needs to except that as truth . And not disregard the truth that is in Jesus .That these people denied and had put to death...
I'm so grateful for this post. i understand the power of being a good example can have such a good influence on those around me
Thank you meaningful people for interviewing Rabbi Manis Friedman!
He brings such clarity and meaning to our current issues within daas Torah! Yasher koach!
So much meaning you that even within 6 minutes, when talking about too many palestinian civilians dying, he can't help himself he chuckles. This is the man that represents your faith? so sad
Full of hatred and disobeying Torah and YHWH
@@zaydevans2077and it's okay for hamas to represent Palestinians?
The hamas leader was asking people to kill jews around the world.
It’s war -unfortunately it happens, especially with the tactics used by Hamas. As retired Marine, I assure you that no one takes pleasure in that fact, but it does happen.
The Rabbi’s cynicism is justified if you listen and dig in to the history of the region.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
This is brilliant. Thank you. GOD bless Israel and the IDF. Israel has and will always prevail.
IsrEl is a terrorist state.
Whether people want to believe it or not this is a Spirtual war, and there’s a lot of forces at play. But remember God is on Israels side.
Who said so?
Zionism is not sanctoned by GOD is it? Where in the Torah does it say follow the ways of an atheist? Where does it say in the Torah, GO CREATE A STATE designed by an atheist who sanction murder, theft, idoltry WHERE? Zionist rabbis are peddling lies.
Deus nunca está ao lado do Genocidio e mentira
Deus nunca estava ao lado do Hitler Deus está sempre ao lado de vitimas os oprimidos
Deus e amor quem mata não tem nada com Deus
Thank you. From an Irishman.
Thank you. This was very clear and informative. Thank you to the Rabbi for expressing his knowledge, experience, and common sense on the subject of inheritance. ❤
Guy supporting Meir Kahane. He got what he preached. Hatred and bloodshed.
Thanks Rabbi Freidman like always you put it so clear!!!!
unbelievable that the host refers to the palestinians just as 'arabs' within the first 7 or so mins. Already trotting out the same sort of stereotypes that would get you called antisemetic the other way round, love it.
@@zaydevans2077calling arabs arabs is a problem?
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
Rabbi Manis Friedmann is a wise man a little knowledge is very dangerous to one who does not understand what knowledge is. This podcast is true enlightment
Thank you, Rabbi! I made Aliyah almost 36 years ago, from Philly.
I am a retired Critical Care Nurse Specialist. I retired 4 years ago. I worked in the Hadassah Ein Kerem ER during the 1st Intifada.
Over those 36 years, I have come to the same conclusions that you teach us, are in the Torah all along.
Even though I know that we never stop learning, I still wish that I heard you teaching this at least 35 years ago.
It would have eased my heart through those years.
Condolences to you, who never learned about apartheid and genocide perpetrated by Zionists towards the Palestinian people.
@debesele Condolences to you, who doesn't know the definitions of Apartheid and Genocide.
You can't have Apartheid if the minority in question has the same rights as the majority, and enjoys the exact same salary for the exact same professions and schooling as the majority.
Genocide can only occur after the annihilation of the majority of the population in question
The so called Palestinians have quadrupled the size of their population, therefore...NO GENOCIDE.
You throw around words that have nothing to do with reality.
Hamas, Hezbullah, Iran and the Palestinian Authority all have in their Charters the intent of committing GENOCIDE against all Jews.
They already perpetrate APARTHEID in the areas that they control. NO JEWS ALLOWED, and PAY FOR SLAY against Jewish civilians.
It must have been very tough as an ER doctor in the first intifada. Not so much at the beginning, when it was only peaceful protests. But once some Idf scumbags murdered a few of the people they hate. Then your emergency room must have been inundated with owies and boo-boos from the relentless rock throwing Palestinian "combatant" prepubescent children "terrorists". Truly. It must have been a horrible time for you. Are you okay? What inspiring strength. Wow.
@@sarahkoren7294You talking BS .Zionists started all this 75 years ago
14:42 - Proportionallity; True Peace!
24:14 - Two enemies Ismael and Yaacov
29:46 - What Israel offered and was refused | Family feud
34:55 - poignant, that the festival was a spiritually placed aversion to a greater evil that could have occured... Woow that's mind blowing... that a glory (kavod) can be the part of the precipitation of an Evil, yet be the Evil's aversion from being more detrimental.... #SeedsThatDieDoLive
38:22 - You got a big point there Rabbi...Israel's to Stand Stong On the Promised Covenant.
45:05 -"bullies only pick on people that appear weak!" #qotd
50:43 - Atheist Jewish; say's he doesn't believe; she says, whether you believe it or not, we know it's true....
52:28 -Oh you don't know that they're chosen?
55:07 -
The right path to see this war is to put it on the Tora context. Thank you, Rabbi Friedman. Amaizing teaching!🔥
Torah said don’t steal and do right.
Why aren’t you following that?
Torah says to kill thousands of children? Phew!
How sad to use the beautiful Tora the words from God, to change it and use it as a weapon or license to kill indiscriminately civilians 🤬 shame on you !
Pure Zionism sickening 🤮
@@LickyTee keep that question for @robs
So important!!! Thank you!!! Your best choice 😊
The way he smirks though, about the issue of civilian casualties😮 and he is a respected spiritual leader???? Insane
This has strengthened me to be unapologetically a supporter of the Jewish people. We, the people of the nations, need you guys. 🕎
As always, it's a wonderful presentation. I wish more people would learn the history and understand the nature of all wars.
How do these killings of innocent people does not remind you history of nazis killing innocent Jews?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
The nature of all wars is rich middle aged men sending their poor counterparts sons to die for money.
Fabulous episode 👏
Very powerful. God won't abandon His children.
Never.
Who are God's children? Did He tell you? Aren't WE ALL GOD'S CHILDREN???
lol they dont have a drop is isrealite blood.. they are from eastern europe ffs
I'm listening to this from Australia. Since this war began on Oct7th Ive wondered if Im the only person onbearth that thinks the way ao do about war, peace, who is your enemy, what is true victory, the death of civilians and the stupidity of encouraging an enemy to hide behind them. (In this situation in particular because the civilians voted Hamas in in 2006 and by far the great majority still suppirt them in full). Imagine my relief when I heard Rabi Manis Friedman tell it like it is. Thank you Rabi, I'm not the mean horrible, nasty person many think I am. Im a realist. I love Israel, all of it belongs to the Jewish poeople and to those they invite to live with them. All of Gaza and the Westbank have long abused the position allowed them and it's time Israel claimed and conqured all that was promised them by God. Every inch of it. That includes ALL of Jerulalem, Israels capitol. And please Israel, get those abominations off Mt Mariah.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
God commanded the Israelites to not end the exile until a Messiah calls them back. Zionism disobeyed God. Your entire beliefs are deception from the Synagogue of Satan. If the Jews had obeyed God, there would be no bloodshed and they would have been given land in an honorable way…. Not like liars and murderers which exactly what the Synagogue of Satan are.
Because the human shields excuse is made up by Zionists.
@@darrene.vonbraun4421 You describe the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, we're by civilians who do not take a direct part and hostilities are included it in the category of non-combatants.
I posit that when you intentionally allow combatants to harbor themselves within your midst, you are participating in an attack and in combat. You cannot have combatants harboring in a hospital, and this information is widely known by those in the hospital that they are standing in front of combatants and say those are civilians. Those are plain closed. Combatants. You are the one who is shameful, shame shame.
I think Rabbi Friedman should speak at the UN!!!
Really LOL.
Thank you! This was great, gave lots of clarity. Spoke truth, we need more of it!
The World wants Am Yisrael to speak their truth and be who they came to be AMEN
I just listened to the whole thing
It’s 💯 worth it 🔥❤️🇮🇱
have you heard of the great march of return? breaks what this guy said about civilians. when they tried to not be a threat and leave they were killed while in non violent protest
@@zaydevans2077do not bother your self brother ! There satanic .. evil predators
@@zaydevans2077 This "march of return" was initiated and orchestrated by the same guys who carried out Oct 7th.
@@miks48 wow crazy, so you're telling me they tried peaceful resistance, were killed brutally 200+ of them. So they were taught once again, peaceful resistance doesn't work?
@@zaydevans2077 there was nothing peaceful about it, as proven beyond doubt on October 7th.
Thats right, you must tell the world as I am born again and I say I was grafted. Rabbi you are precious, Shalom
Guys your podcasts are brilliant... Facts ... My prayers for you guys ...also for your guest the Rabbia he's brilliant PASS MY WARM REGARDS TO HIM PLEASE 🎉.." in war no one is safe" IDF are doing a brilliant job to defend all all across the world 👏 With Prayers and Best Wishes to all my Jewish Brothers and Sisters 🎉 Proud of u all guys ... British Indian SIKH stand by you all... Long live Israel 🇮🇱 💙
Amen 🙏
Wonderful class on Jewish history. Yeshua bless you all.
Great interview. Thank you, Rabbi Friedman and hosts. I am Christian and did not know much about the Jewish religion, but listening provided me clarity about alot of things. The war and how to think about life in general. God Bless all three of you and your loved loves. I am American and I stand with Isreal. She will remain strong and alwsys undefeated. As i tell others, "Don't worry God and Jesus will take care of you. He will always have your back." Gentleman, that is so very true. Keep your faith and don't live in doubt. Keep you eyes on the Lord and he will not fail you. Live in Thanksgiving when life becomes difficult. I wish you and all your loved ones and Isreal Happy Hanukkah. I would love to hear from Rabbi Friedman again. He is so very wise and a true gentleman. Isreal is always in my prayers and "breath prayers" through out my day. ✝️🇮🇱🙏🇱🇷.
Do you believe in the full canonicity and authenticity 1st and 2nd Maccabees as we Catholics do because that is where Hanukkah comes from?
What did these people do against Jésus and his mother ? Did they believe him ? Or did they want to murder him ? where does the presumed love lie in this relationship ? Who lied ?
ha ha, I fell asleep listening to a debate by Ben Shapiro and this video came on autoplay while I was asleep. I dreamed an old Jewish man came to my outside concert and we sat in a tent and discussed Judaism and the response to Hamas and how it's always been. I woke up and this was on. Huh. He looks just like he did in my dream. ha ha! I'm halfway along and so far, nothing he said in the dream is like what he's saying in real life. In fact, some statements are the opposite.
But I like his perspective and his vibe. It's meant to be entirely reasonable, not emotion-based, not inflammatory, just reason. I'd much rather listen to this than all the Palestinian yelling and hissy-fitting.
Youre diagusting
Baruch Hashem. Stand tall. And accept your inheritance !
“The whole issue is inheritance.” I am Christian and we have always known that this is historical truth… nothing will be good enough for them as long as one Jewish child remains alive. We pray for the peace and protection of Israel.
Them?
You do know that for centuries, though, Muslims and Jews lived side by side. And guess where huge numbers of Sephardic Jews went to when they fled Spain? Turkey, Syria, Palestine. The Jewish population was very tiny in Palestine in the 1400s until the Sephardic Jews filled their ranks. The Jews, Christians, and Muslims were neighbors without much incident back then. It was when Zionism emerged in the 20th century that things unraveled. The way Jews and Muslims and the Christians think is based on the politics of the 20th century. It's not how the people thought in the 1800s. An envoy of Rabbi Sonnenfeld who wanted coexistence with Muslims and Christians was shot to death by Zionists. The rabbi grew up with Muslims and liked them.
Rabbi sonnenfeld died from illness that he had for 3 months prior. he died in 1938. ten years before israel. not sure where you got this idea he was shot by zionists? @@QUINTUSMAXIMUS
@@QUINTUSMAXIMUS
never ever Jews lived in peace among Muslims. they lived as dhimmis, as second class subjects, who were constantly robbed, subjected to all kinds of humiliation, and periodically raped and slaughtered en masse. stop spreading this BS. at least not on Jewish channels. we know our history and you only embarrassing yourself. go away!
You cannot be a Christian and support Israel. Read your Bible.
I have been making this point ad nauseam since this war started. Namely why is it that when Arab countries don’t use human shields with each other? Because it wouldn’t be effective. It would have no effect on strategy at all. life does not mean much to them”.
No. The answer is _"because they dont use human shields, ever."_
I love Rabbi Manis Friedman so much!!!
You are sick people
Love God more than anything else ❤
🤮🤮🤧🤮🤮🤮
Christians who are familiar with the scriptures know the Jewish people are G-d's chosen people and the land is yours by inheritance.
amen!
Chosen to bring the messiah and salvation purpose
Only
@@theophilusodafi2 Romans 11:29 For the gifts and the calling of God are not subject to repentance.
@@voiceInDetroit this verse, is out of point
@@KnightWarrior-qn7ul They gave us the Bible and Jesus. If you hate Jesus' race you hate the Bible and Jesus.
it is so refreshing to hear somebody thinking outside of the box.
Love this, suggestion, put on the screen a short description when your use those Jewish words so the rest of us understand
Woe to them that call “good EVIL and evil GOOD “! Baruch HaShem & Shalom Shalom Israel!!! 🙏🇮🇱❤️🇮🇱🙏
I Admire this Rabbi
This was great.
Regarding showing strength: at recent pro Hamas rallies in both NZ and Australia, local Maoris, Christians, arrived before them and performed the haka. This is a ceremonial dance performed by Maori warriors to intimidate their enemies and to give courage to the warriors. (You will always see it performed by New Zealand players prior to international football games.)
The pro Hamas supporters were very intimidated. Anyone would be because Maoris are big boys.
oh, it was glorious! I saw it on YT.
I love this !!
Maoris support Palestine in large numbers. They know what colonizers look like.
I don't mind if you bring Rabbi Friedman more often 😊
Why? He's a completely evil monster.
The Rabbi is telling the truth, is in the Torah I'm a 100% with Israel you're a the chosen people of Adonai. I'm Christian from Samoa and New Zealand
ua-cam.com/video/RiZ2USokfio/v-deo.htmlsi=h0WBfKnth9_jeyuL
The wiseman made perfect sense.
In a truly free world, such words would lead either to prison or to a psychiatric hospital.
Excellent. Voice of truth, clarity... We as Jewish people are so busy trying to make the world happy and always sound like we are "so nice" that we are digging our own grave.. there is a Torah that's the guideline... We are not smarter, more merciful or kinder than g.d and is time to stop pretending we know everything.. to be humble and follow the very clear guidelines the Torah is giving us! And stop excusing ourselves by doing the right thing!!!
Xactly
So weird how jewish people can decide that ‘no longer being nice’ means going full on third reich. I guess that’s what happens when you’re too busy trying to be white european and no actually jewish.
Well the world doesn't go by that you have followed international rules or risk being isolated while being surrounded by enemies
@@revolutionarydragon1123they can't be isolated, world need Jews more than Jews need the world,most of invention in science and technology are mostly done by them ,they are the chosen people, and they are the most wealthiest people in the world
God say to love your enemies ❤❤❤❤😢😢😢😢😢
One of the greatest minds of our times, Rabbi Manis must be a spokesperson for Israel. PLEASE CONSIDER THIS. You see what is happening on the PR front. This is being sent from Eretz Yisrael as a call to serve.
love this, so many pearls of wisdom. thanks so much!!!
❤🇮🇱 "And again, the Lord has said that: Ye shall defend your families even unto bloodshed. Therefore for this cause were the Nephites contending with the Lamanites, to defend themselves, and their families, and their lands, their country, and their rights, and their religion."
"the Nephites were inspired by a better cause, for they were not fighting for monarchy nor power but they were fighting for their homes and their liberties, their wives and their children, and their all, yea, for their rites of worship and their church."
"And they were doing that which they felt was the duty which they owed to their God; for the Lord had said unto them, and also unto their fathers, that: Inasmuch as ye are not guilty of the first offense, neither the second, ye shall not suffer yourselves to be slain by the hands of your enemies." - Alma 43:45-47
Check out the whole chapter of Alma 43 for some amazingly clear parallels to Israel & Hamas in the Nephites & Lamanites. It adds moral clarity in a morally sick and confused world.
Wow. The Lord has blessed you with wisdom. I pray for Israel,. I pray for peace in Jerusalem. 🙏🙏❤️❤️
I love listening to common sense.
As far as "common sense," besides being an oxymoron within itself, it's also a logical fallacy. When people use this phrase, they are admitting to two things: they have no idea what they're talking about, and they have no interest in gaining an idea. At best, people's "common sense" ideas are woeful oversimplifications, but more often than not, they are dumpster fires of hot-takes that say more about the self-righteous ignorance of the speaker than about anything meaningful.
The only thing dumber than the degenerate who argues "common sense" is the is the absolute waste of protoplasm that agrees with them.
_"Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before you reach eighteen."_ *-Lincoln Barnett The Universe and Dr Einstein (1950 ed.)*
Sad to say the seers say there will be no easy end here, only endless war, so your speech is making sure that will happen
Rambam in the 13th century said that killing Amalek is no longer valid as one can no longer recognize who is Amalek, they have been assimilated, traveled etc. So colonialists take verses out of context and use it whenever they like and when it is conventient for them!
First of all, thank you Rabbi Friedman for helping to m'kariv my husband in NMB about 15 years ago.
Here is my question: how do you reconcile your understanding that we already deserve moshiach with what the Chafetz Chaim said "Each generation in which the Temple wasn't rebuilt it's as if it was destroyed anew"? I'm guessing there is another way to understand his statement but most people seem to use that statement as evidence that it is because of our subpar actions that the temple has not been rebuilt.
8:27 it would be interesting to hear his response to the 3no Israeli’s hostages that tried to surrender to the IDF and were then shot
He reminds me so much of my Papa ❤ Calm, wisdom, stability, strength. That which has built up this modern society is what we need. Yet we’re allowing the comfort it created to cause its demise.
A disgusting genocidal murder apologist?
Why do you not have the guts to debate Dr. Norman Finklestein, everyonelse does!!!!!!!
An insightful discussion!
As Jews, you go to the Torah as a Muslim, they go to the Quran, and the Christians go to their Bible. The unfortunate thing is if you have humanity, you don’t need a religious book to tell you how to treat people the whole point of these religions is supposed to be love- and instead you use your ‘holy books’ and dogma to justify oppression and murder of each other. Thank God I don’t follow any of those religions, And so I am free to follow the Divine Master who is LOVE. Peace on Earth, good will to ALL.
Thank you rabbi Manis Friedman
It was fantastic to me watching this talking. I am going to watch it again to try to absorb all this vital knowledge. Thank you
Look at what the quran says about war and peace treatieses... It says that if you make a peace treaty with someone, then abide by it and deal with them fairly. However if they breach the treaty, then you have to fight them until they can't raise arms again... Soo... Hamas broke the ceasefire... Quran says Israel has to vanquish hamas.. Allah and His prophet (peace be upon him) support Israels right to exist and defend itself.
Are you a muslim?
Israel did , Israel always broke the ceasefire but no one mentions that , a few days prior they shot protesters at the border because they were protesting the inhuman treatment of Israel, since January until Oct 7th they killed nearly 300 Palestinians, name 300 people that you know? These people are not just numbers! Of course not to start with all the children and women Israel abducted.
Not true b. s claim
@@Sultan-w5q disprove it then
Sounds good. However it says you can lie to advance your aims… for example, agree to a ceasefire or a two-state solution knowing you’re just using it to gain advantage for an attack later.
8:00 HE ASKS _"WHAT IS A CIVILIAN"!?_ 8:00
International humanitarian law is based on the principle of the distinction between civilians (and civilian objects) and combatants (and military objectives). The civilian is defined in opposition to the combatant. Literally, a “civilian person” is any individual who is not a member of armed forces.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
State practice establishes this rule as a norm of customary international law applicable in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The three components of this rule are interrelated and the practice pertaining to each of them reinforces the validity of the others. The term combatant in this rule is used in its generic meaning, indicating persons who do not enjoy the protection against attack accorded to civilians, but does not imply a right to combatant status or prisoner-of-war status (see Chapter 33).This rule has to be read in conjunction with the prohibition to attack persons recognized to be hors de combat (see Rule 47) and with the rule that civilians are protected against attack unless and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (see Rule 6). Belligerent reprisals against civilians are discussed in Chapter 41.
No official contrary practice was found with respect to either international or non-international armed conflicts. This rule is sometimes expressed in other terms, in particular as the principle of distinction between combatants and non-combatants, whereby civilians who do not take a direct part in hostilities are included in the category of non-combatants.[27] Alleged violations of this rule have generally been condemned by States, irrespective of whether the conflict was international or non-international.[28] Similarly, the UN Security Council has condemned or called for an end to alleged attacks against civilians in the context of numerous conflicts, both international and non-international, including in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Burundi, Georgia, Lebanon, Liberia, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Tajikistan, the former Yugoslavia and the territories occupied by Israel.[29] As early as 1938, the Assembly of the League of Nations stated that “the intentional bombing of civilian populations is illegal”.[30] The 20th International Conference of the Red Cross in 1965 solemnly declared that governments and other authorities responsible for action in all armed conflicts should conform to the prohibition on launching attacks against a civilian population.[31] Subsequently, a UN General Assembly resolution on respect for human rights in armed conflicts, adopted in 1968, declared the principle of distinction to be applicable in all armed conflicts.[32] The Plan of Action for the years 2000-2003, adopted by the 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent in 1999, requires that all parties to an armed conflict respect “the total ban on directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against civilians not taking a direct part in hostilities”.[33]
*_Highlights:_*
When the ICRC appealed to the parties to the conflict in the Middle East in October 1973, i.e., before the adoption of Additional Protocol I, to respect the distinction between combatants and civilians, the States concerned (Egypt, Iraq, Israel and Syria) replied favourably.[17]
In the Kassem case in 1969, Israel’s Military Court at Ramallah recognized the immunity of civilians from direct attack as one of the basic rules of international humanitarian law.[12]
Is it more clear to you, NOW, what is a civilian and what is not? What a shocking thing to do is to display mental gymnastics so as to mentally avoid the dissonance of maliciously redefining the term "civilians" for the dubious purpose of alleviating the shameful feelings of doing murder and war crimes. And by a RABBI! SHAME.
8:58 NO, Mr. RABBI, you DO NOT need to vet if people are civilians and *they DO NOT need some special identifying marker.* IT IS COMBATANTS WHO MUST MARK THEMSELVES AS COMBATANTS. EVERYONE ELSE IS CONSIDERED CIVILIAN UNTIL THEY TAKE DIRECT HOSTILE ACTION AGAINST YOU. Combatants Identify themselves by HAVING WEAPONS or wearing UNIFORMS or driving weapons of war or donning the INSIGNIA of their armed force. You god forsaken monster. If you don't like that, then do not occupy nations.
Id like to point out that the remark that R Manis said regarding "unconditional love" does NOT contradict the whole premise that you spoke about with Sonny Pearlman
when Nesanel speaks about Giving addicts unconditional love that means actually demonstrating that not just saying it and that's what the Rabbi is calling out people who are just told that there "loved" but don't FEEL loved
Also I do think a more appropriate name for the episode would be "war, in hashkafa" that's more accurate based on the conversation that you had
When he states about Zionists being "Ideaologically not His children" he said it all.
It’s always a pleasure to hear you both . Thank you .
A moral compass, devoid of any religion is important for universal justice.
Thank you for sharing such truths so simply
young people please do the research while it is still there
In the turkisch parliment a man was screaming and made treats to the israeli soldiers and that Allah will make them suffer. One minute later he fell down in heart failure and died imeditly. He shouldnt have treatened, Gods choisen people.
This explains so much about what your people is doing to Palestine. Free Palestine 🇵🇸
1:19 Send out a search party for the logic in the arguments of this rabbi, who specializes in declaring other people's ideas absurd. His various assertions, all delivered with absolute certainty and complacency, are embarrassing. No, I am not pro-Hamas. I'm a Jew on the side of fellow humans, whatever their background, and in particular the innocent ones.
I wish you would ask Rabbi Friedman what about the fact that Hashem threw us out of Eretz Yisrael due to our sins, and He has not yet sent Moshiach yet to redeem us. I'm not disputing our obligation to defend ourselves, I just wish someone would reconcile these two facts.
I relate so much to this. As a someone who has been through a lot of suffering and abuse since I was a child the bit about having confidence I claim what’s yours really spoke to me.
which bit did you like especially? When he justified collective punishment because they didn't 'surrender'? How are 2.2 million people supposed to surrender? what would that even look like? He's talking complete bullshit, they've already displaced 1.8 MILLION people what does he want? them to peacefully walk towards the boarder? they did that and got shot down, 200 of them in the great march of return. This is where the issue is, the palestinians aren't civilians because they can't possibly differentiate between the 'terrorists' and the children, so they just bomb all 2.2million of them and hope? Thats what this guy is justifying and you go "yep I had alot of abuse in my life and suffering so him justifying the suffering of 20 thousand people dying with no way to escape, that really struck a cord with me that genocide denial."
@zaydevans2077 where did you get your information from?
@@devikalambert1674 you're going to need to be much more specific than that, which bit do you want a source for?
@@zaydevans2077You misunderstand.
@zaydevans2077 is it mainstream, hamas or properganda, have you visited or lived in gaza, have you lived in Israel?
@MeaningfulPeople
@Niche....
First time seeing you. Just wanting to say that the way you present is outstanding. Simple outstanding. You could easily have your own show on CBN.
And more importantly bro, you do it in a beautiful way as to be " a light to nations".
Well done oh son of Hashem.
Shalom
Very inspiring. thank you very much for this talk. ❤️❤️
I thought religious Hebrews are not supposed to even support Israel until the messiah comes
Oh my goodness, this makes so much sense. People that can’t be happy no matter what they get, never satisfied.
Speaking of human shields. It is the IDF that uses palestinians as human shields
Thank you rabbi
One of the major issues in other countries is the inability to for so many people that there is an inability to differentiate between Palestinians and Hamas. Are we doing the same thing in this discussion? Is it possible that we are in a unique place right now where we have more support and a different relationship with some of our neighbors in the Middle East, than we previously had, and that there is a process of peace that we may be able to achieve with the support of both Jews and Palestinians? What if Hamas can be eliminated by taking their power away and Palestinians are willing to accept a governing body that actually acts in their best interests. Do you think they would accept a new leadership? Do you believe that Netayahu has not empowered Hamas? We have 2 traumatized nations that want to feel safe.
If Mashiach is waiting for people to understand we might be hopeless 😩
God bless Israel forever 🙏
Hey thank you very much for this enlightening conversation and insights. This helps all Jews get keys and be prepared for the spiritual front which is all part of this war. Though as a diaspora Jew there are some Hebrew terms which I don’t get. It would be nice to have clear translations or explanations in a box. Thank you for your work !
spiritual must be expressed in righteous deeds and acts, not in occupation and killing of children
@@rivkaestherkletski4184 are you talking about killing, raping, abducting in the name of allah ? Do you expect Jews to wait to be butchered again and again ?
Come to Israel dear rabbi fridman help us build a sensible system
Looks a bit like a red-headed Ben Shapiro on .75 speed 😂 🫶🇦🇺🇮🇱 love from Australia.
Jews should be the most confident ppl in the world. In spite of 3000 plus years of persecution you all are still most prominent and are a living proof of the existence of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob
The discussion of Eisav/hunter/trophy seeker vs. Yishmael/inheritance/rightful owner was gevaldig!! It made me wonder, however, what was 'the deal" with the Crusades? Why did "Eisav" seek to conquer "Yishmael" (and why did so many communities of Yidden have to suffer because they were in the path? How does this episode of history fit into the paradigm?
Crusades were an answer to Muslim conquer of the Holy Land, desecration of Holy Sites and cruel persecution of Christians living in the Eastern Roman Empire area and Middle East. unless the Crusades (and believe me, as a Jew, I have my own grievances at crusaders who didn’t differentiate between Muslim invaders and peaceful Jews ) and the Reconquista, you would be a Muslim today and most probably won’t have the life standard and technology you are enjoying now, because Crusades were the force that stopped the advancement of the Islamic Chaliphate to the West on their way to their ultimate goal of global domination.
and now the internet does it's job at helping thousands of muslims see the light of the bible.
with islam there can never be world peace.
@@unisophia
I wish I understood more Hebrew. But this episode with Rabbi Friedman has blessed me so much.
This is the best episode ever! I just don’t understand when we all have to feel a certain way like won’t we always have people who don’t feel a way .. like what is it like majority or really everyone has to believe ?
This has been a big question of mine for a while now
Christ Jesus Is Our PEACE In This Troubled World.Only Thru HIM We Can Have Peace
(Romans 16:20)
"The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus be with you."
Rabbi Friedman I am soooo glad you mentioned the music festival..they danced around a statue of Budda!!!
But he justified that. Said it was ok. That is crazy.
@@voiceInDetroitYou missed the point. He didn't justify the statue or the profaning of the holy day; he merely said that the Jew dances on Simchat Torah. Even the Jew farthest away from Torah retains a spark of holiness, no matter how deeply it is buried.
@@SeekingToServe thanks. I am glad he didn't intend to justify it. Would he say the same thing about the dancing around the golden calf in Exodus?