Inside Dyson : Part 1
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
- Inside Dyson : Part 1 -
This video content was made from the James Dyson Foundation charity number 1099709, and was made for educational purposes.
James attended London's Byam Shaw art school but painting beautiful objects wasn't enough. James wanted to make, and the Royal College of Art allowed just that. James studied architecture, but instead of colonnades and cladding, robust marine engineering was the order of the day. He developed a flat-hulled high-speed landing craft and, with it, his passion for engineering. Pretty soon, he'd also developed a new kind of wheelbarrow -- one with a big fat ball that didn't sink into mud and chunky feet for stability. All the while learning to take risks, make mistakes and use frustration as a fuel for creativity and solving problems.
Problems like vacuum cleaners that lose suction. Could the cyclone technology he'd first spotted on a sawmill work in a vacuum cleaner? He ripped the dusty clogged bag from his old vacuum and replaced it with a crude prototype. 5,126 prototypes later: Dual Cyclone™ technology and the first bagless vacuum cleaner.
During the five years it took to develop his first vacuum, James was also battling. First to convince other manufacturers to embrace his new technology. Then to protect his invention when they copied it. It's enough to give you a complex. And it did. James' experience informs the way Dyson works today. Keeping our inventions secret. Protecting our ideas. Always taking risks. Like developing a washing machine with 2-drums; emission-filtering diesel exhausts; clean air hand dryers; balls instead of wheels; robots -- even a new type of school to get young people into engineering. Always new and better.
I like how James does not take all credit but gives a lot to his engineers too
The development of the Dyson Digital Motor is where I find the most interesting. It is the beauty within the machine.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS WONDERFUL UPLOAD :)
@tommyboomboom It took my DC04 9 years for it's first bit of tape. We were also terrible at cleaning the filters, but it still worked. Normally when I go to a house with a Dyson, it's from the 1999/2001 period. I think what you mean about is the newer Dysons that are dropping in stability.
Seriously! is everyone at that company attractive
I just don't get the Price over $600 for a Vacuum,it's like the $700 Canada Goose coats people are crazy for.
Click on the annotation at the end.
They're not dead at all. People just don't know how to clean the filter!
Tengo la Dyson DC32 Allergy Plus y es extraordinaria. Vale hasta el último euro que piden por ella. Saludos
Hmm...comparing my 20-year old Rainbow to a 5-year old Dyson....and a lot of people can also compare their 20+ year old Electrolux and Tri-Star units....biiig difference. Also, for Dyson lovers out there, Rexair had the first truely bagless vacuum cleaner over 60 years before Dyson's....
can you post part 1
My DC33 is proof that Dyson rules! Any takers?
@colinatlantic Nope, I only part one and two. The whole thing.
@THEREWILLBEBLOOD67 Me complace oír que desea su vacío de Dyson.
@colinatlantic I did, click on the annotation at the end.
@derick1259 ok i did and i saw the whole thing but is there a part 3
Why would anyone buy expensive Playskool looking vacuums when you could buy a Royal metal vacuum?
cleatrampler fg8
cleatrampler fg8n.
Because Dysons are better
Vuestro producto es buenísimo, el servicio técnico de lo mejor que he visto, realmente es un producto duradero, pero viendo vuestros vídeos me preocupa que apenas parece que haya mujeres ingenierías en su compañía y que las únicas mujeres que salen en los vídeos son las que usan la aspiradora....
@colinatlantic i ment 2
Have any of their patents gone through? I mean.. I see lots of copycat vacuum cleaners.
Yh its gone now, but I guess it wasnt all that, cuz not many use them
first
Yet again irritating background music.
Kinda proud I archived this video anyways, I don't think it can be found anywhere else now.
eueeka copied