Generative fill has helped me loads in my retouching. But its a tool like no other. Ive found its great for smaller jobs. eg: I did a model shoot and I had grey fringing from the backdrop around the hair and I couldnt get a good cut out. I got it close, then use generative fill to tidy it up and remove the fringing. Looks great now. Basically used it as a fancy "remove" tool.
AI is a great tool, but people mistake its versatility for excellence. A craftsman is only as good as his tools, but a novice with the best tools can't replace a craftsman that has mastered his.
@@hadensnodgrass3472 Exactly. I was saying to a friend recently that this PS update means we will see a lot more great but also alot more bad Photoshop jobs. As those who are already skilled will be able to make stuff quicker and better, but so many people will just use the AI and call it a day without putting in the extra work needed.
During a recent photoshoot, I discovered a fantastic tourist attraction as my backdrop. These tools allowed me to clean up imperfections and add elements that were missing during the shoot. They took my images to a whole new level, providing me with creative possibilities I could only dream of before, that would’ve been hours spent in editing. These tools served as a time-saving solution for tasks like compositing and editing. Going forward, I plan to continue using this AI tool to complement my artistic vision and editing style, even if its capabilities evolve over time.
No AI can ever replace humans, creative mind and logical thinking at the moment os out of AI's knowledge... Maybe it'll be also introduced in future but the can never fully replace artists and editors, they can make the work easier for sure
@@rushikeshpabalkar6943 How many AI bots have you developed to pass this comment ? How much is your knowledge in AI development field ? Are you the one watching Reels and UA-cam related to AI and then deciding on the basis of that with zero on ground knowledge ?
@@rushikeshpabalkar6943it's only going to make things easy as of now or it will create more jobs somehow but that new job is definitely going to replace alot of jobs
The companies that demur to employ designers for things like vector logos and branding…will reap what they sow. AI is currently all about churning out an “average” of human output-nothing original or unique comes out of it. Hard to stand out from the crown and develop branding that way_
thsoe designers had better learn how to use AI then, because they ARE in risk of losing their jobs. but not to AI itself, to someone that knows AI and can do their job better than they can, and charge less to do it.
But all the points in this video are based on the current Beta. Which is obviously the worst it will ever be. Most likely all these points that are mentioned are " fixed " within 1 or 2 versions. the resolution will get better, etc.
@@D0nKeY Most of the problems he mentioned have not or just barely improved in any generative tool. Precision for example is basically unreachable for AI. And it is really not clear how that could even be achieved at all. It will get better of cause but "fixed" within one or two versions? We'll see about that...
I totally agree with you Unmesh, Generative Ai can't replace us, it's just the part of the Ai ability. But certainly it will affect some jobs. I think we should learn how to use it for our own benefit.
A solution to the piece by piece continuation problem could be to fill the entire area getting the continuation you like, then piece by piece going back over it with the smaller fills.
So many think Ai is going to be a 1 click solution. I hear people saying that ANYONE can now do the stuff that we took years to learn. I think that is a false statement, Ai is a tool for us to use in our workflow, but it will never be 100% accurate or do exactly what we require. Also the main stumbling block for people who don't know the basics in Photoshop, is when a client wants a certain part changed, if they try to recreate it in Ai, they won't get the exact image they 1st produced, so now they will be stuck on how to fix the issues
You are spot on as always. Right now its "The Kings New Clothes" Once its out of Beta you can bet you are going to be paying for just as you pay to use Stock Photography. Paying clients want perfection not something almost right.
a few clients will want perfection (good luck getting them seeing as every photographer will be fighting you) most want something usable for the lowest price, with the advances in AI, the cost will easily beat out paying for a human.
A lot of examples of why it's a beta. Let's wait and see how it progresses. Thanks for all of your videos on these new features. I enjoy learning, you demonstrated skill is still needed.
Tbf this feature is in beta and is getting better by the week. Give it two years and i'll be interested in your thoughts. Saying that they will always need a creative to use these tools. A retoucher will be using generative fill 1.0 and beyond to help their workflows.
I think if you do it piece-by-piece it might still take less time by doing it also might not. If you can maybe do square pieces to create a column then merge the layers and then do it again so he knows its continuation
"Yet" is definitely the word to use. But I agree on all the imperfect results, which I have gotten with my own experiments with Generative Fill. And like you, I have had to go in and tweak things with extra work a lot of the time. I really don't know why it fills empty spaces with distorted people all the time - that should be eliminated from all results, nobody wants people added in when they're so mutated. Just inanimate objects and nature, please.
I tried many times to get Generative fill to work but it was far to frustrating for me . I will wait for the regular release version and hope it's better
Bhai Aaj hi Plan liya maine Specially AI photoshop ke liye .... Dekho ye samajho ye sirf suruaat hai ... Mid journey bhi use kar raha hu mai starting se jab se free tha tab se ... Things takes time ... Jaise mid journey ne bhi almost 1.5-2 saal le hi liye tab jaake itane aage aaye hai ye log ... Adobe is king of Graphics and photo industry from last so many decades.... Lao Lao competition lao... Ye bhi karenge update jakh marvake
I am also 22 years in the graphic and web industry and when i saw many youtubers are readily uploading videos with thunbs like AI can do this and that, i was worried that time because we are getting the good payroll because of good experience and commands plus speedy work. But now i m relaxed because I checked most of the Ai tools and they were helping the designers and developers, not replace the human beings because even for AI, a tech person can do creative stuff. The only cons is that like many clients and companies thinking that they can hire low level budget interns because they now thinking that anybody can do this work but soon, everone will realise that god made the humans and humans still facing all the challenges and so called AI will be fall badly
Solution for 1 and 2...just first generate low rez image of the whole gap, than generate sectional high rez squares with full information (how to continue) on other 4 sides, instead of 1 or 2...
As always, an incisive and eye-opening video. Yes, the pros have no fear, but they must not rest on their laurels. Newbies using AI would leapfrog and edge out the laggards. Therefore "Keep calm and keep on learning."
I’ve had fun playing with it -especially to make my kids laugh (they still like liquify better, though). BUT, I still end up using my own work. It’s more satisfying and accurate.
Got to say, there's certainly 1 thing that A.I hasn't failed to do for me yet. And that's making me laugh. XD I laughed so much just from watching his reactions to the A.I generations in this video.
Hi! As always thank you so much for the awesome videos and tutorials!! But this Beta Photoshop, we can’t use an images that generated from Photoshop Beta for a commercial, is that true? For instance we can’t use a model with a scene that generated from Photoshop Beta for a packaging, advertisement, or print on a product, is that true?
you could fix all that with stable diffusion if photoshop is using that for the plugins maybe they will let us add our own models and extensions. using stable diffusion along with photoshop is so awesome for me.
Just found it funny when I see people like you do great things with it, but when I try it whatever I ask PS to generate it looks awful, and not just awful, too awful to make anything of it with some editing, for example I "asked" for a flock of birds in a sky, and all it came up with is a bunch of resized bird decals, like you see on windows, also asked for a shark and it was a very cartoonish shark, and no matter what I tried it just got worse :-)
It's just a matter of time,it will get powerful someday,If it can do such things which was unexpected in the past,So in the future it will be more powerful.
hey unmesh ! i'm an old fan of yours , i started watching your vedios about 2 years ago , but i didn't had any device , now i am practicing through your vedios , they are really helpful but i often face problems about the practice files you provide , most of them there are girls picture in it , so when i m practicing my mother interrogates me that who is she , my mother doubts that she might be my girlfriend , how do i fix this issue , today she told me how many girlfriends do you have ? its kinda emberrasing tho ,, btw thanks for the precious content out there
Sir, i think those who not purchase the beta will not get realistic generative fill, i select every where and generative fill not looks like you i confused
Since i’m more in motion graphics world i can speak only about that. For example roto brush 2 is life changing . But will my clients buy After Effects just to use it? And what after that. There is 1000 steps after that so it’s usable for professional purposes. So i think ai stuff is here to help us. And even if it’s easy for clients i don’t think everyone have that much time to make their own commercials or stuff.
@@mcbean1 yes but less money for clients is usually more clients in the future. So you will work easier but you will produce more content and in the end you will have same money
@@astagajeem2003 the amount of clients is finite, I would imagine that if you polled every graphic designer now on average they would wish they had a few more clients today. So you if require every designers to increase the number of clients when there is already an insufficient amount, the only outcome will be that some % of graphic designers will have to quit.
I will try to do something as simple like remove text from a poster, and it will say "Content removed due to user guidelines". As soon as I saw that, i knew for a fact- This is replacing nobody!
Plz Make Video With Generetive Fill How To Use--Face Beard Remove, Beard White Hear Change Black, Face Skin Retouch, Skin Color Tone Correction, Face Dodge and Burn
I can't understand why they made it so we need to generate in 1024 sections for a clear fill instead of just having Photoshop automatically generate each of the small sections and merge when an area is large, all behind the scenes
While AI and automation technologies have the potential to replace certain tasks and processes, they are more likely to augment human capabilities rather than completely replace jobs. AI excels at repetitive, data-driven tasks, while humans bring creativity, emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and adaptability to the table. As a result, many job roles will evolve to focus on tasks that require human skills, allowing you to adapt and collaborate with AI systems rather than being replaced by them.
Generative fill seems best at out of focus textured fills, and the more defined the object the less control one has over the result. AI is really an ‘identikit’ system and completely dependent on what original artwork it has scraped off the internet or from stock libraries. That is why the more it is used the more locked into fixed ‘looks’ its output becomes. Variety is not originality.
I think most of the things you pointed out would be solved eventually and we know how AI tech is evolving, but obviously everyone won't loose job like a person like you would always benifit from it
I really hope they improve the resolution soon. I wanted to use it to replace the need for searching for images in composites. As of now it's not good enough because the images are fuzzy.
11:56 “What in the world is happening in the corner?” So…Adobe enforces “user guidelines” for some image that is completely uncontroversial and SFW 7:56 but Adobe Photoshop can generate some questionable content when _it_ wants (and which is totally unnecessary since the generative fill could obviously just continue the beach and the vegetation). Got it.
The sad part of Ai especially Midjourney is people on platforms like 500PX, Vero etc are creating and posting images and claiming them as their photography and so many people are falling for it. Ai has it's uses for sure, but it is now causing trust issues and I don't like it.
Generative fill has helped me loads in my retouching. But its a tool like no other. Ive found its great for smaller jobs. eg: I did a model shoot and I had grey fringing from the backdrop around the hair and I couldnt get a good cut out. I got it close, then use generative fill to tidy it up and remove the fringing. Looks great now. Basically used it as a fancy "remove" tool.
AI is a great tool, but people mistake its versatility for excellence. A craftsman is only as good as his tools, but a novice with the best tools can't replace a craftsman that has mastered his.
@@hadensnodgrass3472 Exactly. I was saying to a friend recently that this PS update means we will see a lot more great but also alot more bad Photoshop jobs. As those who are already skilled will be able to make stuff quicker and better, but so many people will just use the AI and call it a day without putting in the extra work needed.
During a recent photoshoot, I discovered a fantastic tourist attraction as my backdrop. These tools allowed me to clean up imperfections and add elements that were missing during the shoot. They took my images to a whole new level, providing me with creative possibilities I could only dream of before, that would’ve been hours spent in editing. These tools served as a time-saving solution for tasks like compositing and editing. Going forward, I plan to continue using this AI tool to complement my artistic vision and editing style, even if its capabilities evolve over time.
This has to legitimately be the best thumbnail designed yet
No AI can ever replace humans, creative mind and logical thinking at the moment os out of AI's knowledge... Maybe it'll be also introduced in future but the can never fully replace artists and editors, they can make the work easier for sure
See you in 2 years
It can
@@rushikeshpabalkar6943 How many AI bots have you developed to pass this comment ? How much is your knowledge in AI development field ? Are you the one watching Reels and UA-cam related to AI and then deciding on the basis of that with zero on ground knowledge ?
@@BlahDepartment I am learner of machine learning and deep learning.
@@rushikeshpabalkar6943it's only going to make things easy as of now or it will create more jobs somehow but that new job is definitely going to replace alot of jobs
Yup, after working with it for a few weeks, its a fantastic tool, can be a huge time-saver. But it ain't replacing anybody anytime soon.
The fear of being replaced by AI is a significant concern for some designers.
The companies that demur to employ designers for things like vector logos and branding…will reap what they sow. AI is currently all about churning out an “average” of human output-nothing original or unique comes out of it.
Hard to stand out from the crown and develop branding that way_
thsoe designers had better learn how to use AI then, because they ARE in risk of losing their jobs. but not to AI itself, to someone that knows AI and can do their job better than they can, and charge less to do it.
@@CyberwizardProductions and that is the truth.
But all the points in this video are based on the current Beta. Which is obviously the worst it will ever be. Most likely all these points that are mentioned are " fixed " within 1 or 2 versions. the resolution will get better, etc.
@@D0nKeY Most of the problems he mentioned have not or just barely improved in any generative tool. Precision for example is basically unreachable for AI. And it is really not clear how that could even be achieved at all. It will get better of cause but "fixed" within one or two versions? We'll see about that...
As always amazing content sir keep creating 🙏🙏
I totally agree with you Unmesh, Generative Ai can't replace us, it's just the part of the Ai ability. But certainly it will affect some jobs. I think we should learn how to use it for our own benefit.
A solution to the piece by piece continuation problem could be to fill the entire area getting the continuation you like, then piece by piece going back over it with the smaller fills.
I tried that, that’s good thinking. However, when you do that, Gen AI assumes the reference image to be “blurred” and creates blurry results.
I can't find the option...can anyone pls tell me where it is in Photoshop?
@@PiXimperfect That's what I thought too..😀
@@kpopgirl824 Make sure you're using the Beta version, then you'll find Generative Fill in the Edit menu dropdown
So many think Ai is going to be a 1 click solution. I hear people saying that ANYONE can now do the stuff that we took years to learn. I think that is a false statement, Ai is a tool for us to use in our workflow, but it will never be 100% accurate or do exactly what we require. Also the main stumbling block for people who don't know the basics in Photoshop, is when a client wants a certain part changed, if they try to recreate it in Ai, they won't get the exact image they 1st produced, so now they will be stuck on how to fix the issues
I'm from Portugal and I love your videos. I love creative photomontages and I learn a lot here. thanks.
I really like how you are so positive and support us with your experience and your words, indeed you are my best teacher. ❤️🔥
You are spot on as always. Right now its "The Kings New Clothes" Once its out of Beta you can bet you are going to be paying for just as you pay to use Stock Photography. Paying clients want perfection not something almost right.
a few clients will want perfection (good luck getting them seeing as every photographer will be fighting you) most want something usable for the lowest price, with the advances in AI, the cost will easily beat out paying for a human.
A lot of examples of why it's a beta. Let's wait and see how it progresses. Thanks for all of your videos on these new features. I enjoy learning, you demonstrated skill is still needed.
They always show the success never how crazy it gets most of the time
Your thumbnail! Finally an answer to how you’re so good at photoshop…
Tbf this feature is in beta and is getting better by the week. Give it two years and i'll be interested in your thoughts. Saying that they will always need a creative to use these tools. A retoucher will be using generative fill 1.0 and beyond to help their workflows.
I think if you do it piece-by-piece it might still take less time by doing it also might not. If you can maybe do square pieces to create a column then merge the layers and then do it again so he knows its continuation
"Yet" is definitely the word to use. But I agree on all the imperfect results, which I have gotten with my own experiments with Generative Fill. And like you, I have had to go in and tweak things with extra work a lot of the time.
I really don't know why it fills empty spaces with distorted people all the time - that should be eliminated from all results, nobody wants people added in when they're so mutated. Just inanimate objects and nature, please.
I tried many times to get Generative fill to work but it was far to frustrating for me . I will wait for the regular release version and hope it's better
Thank you for adding a non-subscription option to your plugin!!!
Great tutorial and in-depth review. Plus, your thumbnail for this video is hilarious! 😆
Thank you for your work! ❤️
Bhai Aaj hi Plan liya maine Specially AI photoshop ke liye .... Dekho ye samajho ye sirf suruaat hai ... Mid journey bhi use kar raha hu mai starting se jab se free tha tab se ... Things takes time ... Jaise mid journey ne bhi almost 1.5-2 saal le hi liye tab jaake itane aage aaye hai ye log ... Adobe is king of Graphics and photo industry from last so many decades.... Lao Lao competition lao... Ye bhi karenge update jakh marvake
I am also 22 years in the graphic and web industry and when i saw many youtubers are readily uploading videos with thunbs like AI can do this and that, i was worried that time because we are getting the good payroll because of good experience and commands plus speedy work. But now i m relaxed because I checked most of the Ai tools and they were helping the designers and developers, not replace the human beings because even for AI, a tech person can do creative stuff. The only cons is that like many clients and companies thinking that they can hire low level budget interns because they now thinking that anybody can do this work but soon, everone will realise that god made the humans and humans still facing all the challenges and so called AI will be fall badly
You are right my friend ❤ make videos on colorgrading in camera raw and any tricks to colorgrade wedding photos cohesive and consistent ❤
Solution for 1 and 2...just first generate low rez image of the whole gap, than generate sectional high rez squares with full information (how to continue) on other 4 sides, instead of 1 or 2...
As always, an incisive and eye-opening video. Yes, the pros have no fear, but they must not rest on their laurels. Newbies using AI would leapfrog and edge out the laggards. Therefore "Keep calm and keep on learning."
Nice aproach bro! By the way what's your keyboard? tks
I’ve had fun playing with it -especially to make my kids laugh (they still like liquify better, though). BUT, I still end up using my own work. It’s more satisfying and accurate.
Not yet, but will for sure 😊
Make the video on same topic after Adobe released stable version of this AI or after 1.0 or 2.0 version release.😊
Make video about quality control solar curve
Hello sir, i wanna learn to make game topup pricelist, which video or playlist should i watch? Thanks
Got to say, there's certainly 1 thing that A.I hasn't failed to do for me yet. And that's making me laugh. XD I laughed so much just from watching his reactions to the A.I generations in this video.
Hey brother... You're on spot.. AI apne ko nahi replace karr rahaa..hum logg hi AI ke pichhe paagal hai..😅
Nice work sir
🎉
Hi! As always thank you so much for the awesome videos and tutorials!! But this Beta Photoshop, we can’t use an images that generated from Photoshop Beta for a commercial, is that true? For instance we can’t use a model with a scene that generated from Photoshop Beta for a packaging, advertisement, or print on a product, is that true?
"Yet" is the right word :D
Thank you
Thanks for the laughs this morning, some of those AI generations were so funny!
you could fix all that with stable diffusion if photoshop is using that for the plugins maybe they will let us add our own models and extensions. using stable diffusion along with photoshop is so awesome for me.
Is generative fill available on the Pirate Bay yet???
When I made a cover it was useless but for fine toning is good
Just found it funny when I see people like you do great things with it, but when I try it whatever I ask PS to generate it looks awful, and not just awful, too awful to make anything of it with some editing, for example I "asked" for a flock of birds in a sky, and all it came up with is a bunch of resized bird decals, like you see on windows, also asked for a shark and it was a very cartoonish shark, and no matter what I tried it just got worse :-)
0:31 "Yet" The most important part 😂
nice thank you sir
Generative Fill will not replace photo editor but will help him,and will help someone that is new in photoshop and will be fun
Great bro.
It's just a matter of time,it will get powerful someday,If it can do such things which was unexpected in the past,So in the future it will be more powerful.
can you make a tutorial for tiktok/instagram reel video quality? 🙏
Yup!The only way it just help you sometimes quickly.And you still got creat subjects by yourself.
hey unmesh ! i'm an old fan of yours , i started watching your vedios about 2 years ago , but i didn't had any device , now i am practicing through your vedios , they are really helpful but i often face problems about the practice files you provide , most of them there are girls picture in it , so when i m practicing my mother interrogates me that who is she , my mother doubts that she might be my girlfriend , how do i fix this issue , today she told me how many girlfriends do you have ? its kinda emberrasing tho ,, btw thanks for the precious content out there
Interesting tools
Sir, i think those who not purchase the beta will not get realistic generative fill, i select every where and generative fill not looks like you i confused
He won't replace people only the way of how to work, it will definetly have an impact on it, that will just make the process faster
Since i’m more in motion graphics world i can speak only about that. For example roto brush 2 is life changing . But will my clients buy After Effects just to use it? And what after that. There is 1000 steps after that so it’s usable for professional purposes. So i think ai stuff is here to help us. And even if it’s easy for clients i don’t think everyone have that much time to make their own commercials or stuff.
no they might not buy AE, but they might offer you less money if they know there is less and less 'work' required.
@@mcbean1 yes but less money for clients is usually more clients in the future. So you will work easier but you will produce more content and in the end you will have same money
@@astagajeem2003 the amount of clients is finite, I would imagine that if you polled every graphic designer now on average they would wish they had a few more clients today. So you if require every designers to increase the number of clients when there is already an insufficient amount, the only outcome will be that some % of graphic designers will have to quit.
I will try to do something as simple like remove text from a poster, and it will say "Content removed due to user guidelines". As soon as I saw that, i knew for a fact- This is replacing nobody!
Thanks 🙏👍
What will happen when its possible to generate high res images
sir a video made of costume design in photoshop
Plz Make Video With Generetive Fill How To Use--Face Beard Remove, Beard White Hear Change Black, Face Skin Retouch, Skin Color Tone Correction, Face Dodge and Burn
is that a plugin to use stable diffusion? they have a extension that fixes hands. i have it down.
For expert editor maybe not but for beginner and Intermediate maybe replace
This is start. Who knows what will come in future. Imagine ps old versions and now...
Enjoyed ❤
It's definitely reasy for Prime Time.
Umesh bhai❤️
I can't understand why they made it so we need to generate in 1024 sections for a clear fill instead of just having Photoshop automatically generate each of the small sections and merge when an area is large, all behind the scenes
That Lil Uzi reference 🤣
can anyone plz tell me the name of the song he used at the end (outrow)
Thank you :D
In Short, "We're Safe". Thanks for the Hope dear brother.
SOme of these problems can be solved by Stable diffusion and upscaling. Wait another year and they will be fixed in PS natively.
While AI and automation technologies have the potential to replace certain tasks and processes, they are more likely to augment human capabilities rather than completely replace jobs. AI excels at repetitive, data-driven tasks, while humans bring creativity, emotional intelligence, critical thinking, and adaptability to the table. As a result, many job roles will evolve to focus on tasks that require human skills, allowing you to adapt and collaborate with AI systems rather than being replaced by them.
Generative fill seems best at out of focus textured fills, and the more defined the object the less control one has over the result. AI is really an ‘identikit’ system and completely dependent on what original artwork it has scraped off the internet or from stock libraries. That is why the more it is used the more locked into fixed ‘looks’ its output becomes. Variety is not originality.
I think most of the things you pointed out would be solved eventually and we know how AI tech is evolving, but obviously everyone won't loose job like a person like you would always benifit from it
Also, I had to talk a client through exporting a PDF once. We massively underestimate just how tech and design illiterate 90% of clients are.
*_Bro MAKE A VEDIO with EXPERIMENTing with ""MIDJOURNY V5.1_* ❤
I imagine all these issues will be fixed by photoshops 2024 release
That "Yet! " is so scary man
put "yet" in the title
You are a gem 💎 bro
I haven't played with AI generative fill much yet but yeah sometimes it does weird things
When AI works perfectly : WOW, look how amazing this is!
When AI isn't perfect: SEE?! Your job is safe!
I really hope they improve the resolution soon. I wanted to use it to replace the need for searching for images in composites. As of now it's not good enough because the images are fuzzy.
"Yet."😄
Thanks for talking people off the edge. Generative Fill is interesting but has a long way to go. Seems better at deleting things than anything else! 😮
"Yet" is the keyword here.😊
That's a small Hope, generate fill still on beta, give it another 6months or 1years and we will see
11:56 “What in the world is happening in the corner?”
So…Adobe enforces “user guidelines” for some image that is completely uncontroversial and SFW 7:56 but Adobe Photoshop can generate some questionable content when _it_ wants (and which is totally unnecessary since the generative fill could obviously just continue the beach and the vegetation). Got it.
I hate the fact that you can't even create something cool or badass like John Wick or any game that has guns in them. It's WAY too restrictive.
The sad part of Ai especially Midjourney is people on platforms like 500PX, Vero etc are creating and posting images and claiming them as their photography and so many people are falling for it. Ai has it's uses for sure, but it is now causing trust issues and I don't like it.
Love you my perfect brother ❤.
inspiration for millions 🫂.
Compare it with dall e
Lil Uzi comparsion got me.
His forehead looks like messed up AI too.
sir a am album desingner 1 want sir 1 photo in a file ( i paste 2nd photo in file 2nd photo automatic convert 1 photo same size )
WOW MY HERO ALWAYS THINK LIKE ME
Reason #6 - No machine on the planet has the patience to work with "my" clients!
Whwn Generative AI will reach Midjourney Version 5 quality for everything will be incredibile using it! ❤️❤️❤️❤️