There's no shortage of scientists - amateur or professional - who try to redefine nothing into something. Do NOT let them get away with it. Stand your philosophical ground. Nothing means nothing. I saw that clip of Dawkins spending a good minute trying to describe this potential nothing. You can't describe it because there's nothing to describe. What he attempted to describe was something.
You know the more dynamic and literal translation of Genesis 1 begins as , “WHEN yhwh began to creation the urbane and earth…” which leaves the Bible open to the Big Bang theory. The burden is on atheists to explain where the elements snd force to cause the Big Bang came from. Believers don’t have this problem
Thank u J Warner for your work in this!! Seems this is a Ace of confidence in the hand of a believers. Question: Other secular arguments of science out there since this video was done? Which is most prevalent?
God said that He would make the new universe with a big bang too / A loud roar of fire.... 2 Peter 3 "10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. 11 Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives 12 as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. 13 But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells." Revelation 20 "11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them." Revelation 21 "Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,” for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Look! God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. 4 ‘He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death’ or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”"
If you want to call the big banger god that’s fine…Why though does this god have to be tied to a religious doctrine? There is also very good evidence that Jesus was made up and his story has been told several different times from several different ideologies. Who’s ideology then is the correct one? Jew, Muslim, Hindu or Christian? Each one condemns their non believer to hell. This seems very implausible. That being said, a creator seems quite plausible.
Origin of life is complex question and everyone has right to have his own opinion until experimental proof is available. Just like "the Earth is the center of Universe" things stated by the relegion a century ago.
Experimental proof is not real proof, just supposition. Only the Holy Trinity explains all the evidence. The "the Earth is the center of Universe", was opinion of secular humanists who may have been religious, & attended a church, but that did not make them Christian, only a relationship with the Lord makes one a Christian. P.s. its spelt "religion".
One of the many things I love about this guy is that I'm quite thick, but I can always understand how he puts things across. I love him.
I like how use your police experiences to explain these things
There's no shortage of scientists - amateur or professional - who try to redefine nothing into something. Do NOT let them get away with it. Stand your philosophical ground. Nothing means nothing. I saw that clip of Dawkins spending a good minute trying to describe this potential nothing. You can't describe it because there's nothing to describe. What he attempted to describe was something.
do not lose sight of the fact that there was no big bang. (see Psalms 33:6-9)
You know the more dynamic and literal translation of Genesis 1 begins as , “WHEN yhwh began to creation the urbane and earth…” which leaves the Bible open to the Big Bang theory. The burden is on atheists to explain where the elements snd force to cause the Big Bang came from. Believers don’t have this problem
Somehow, we need to get you to Erie, PA! Love your style and presentations!!
Brilliant deductions, as usual Sir.
*_May God Bless and help others come to the Truth._*
Very informative video
Person of Interest is great!!!
Intereesting.
My favourite part is at 5:55
Thank u J Warner for your work in this!! Seems this is a Ace of confidence in the hand of a believers. Question: Other secular arguments of science out there since this video was done? Which is most prevalent?
Where do I start with this series?
What video was it that he talked about when God questioned Job?
Have you met Hugh Ross I know you quote him in your book.
Great stuff !!!
Love the way this guy thinks.
This man is a gift from God....praise the Lord Jesus.
God spoke, and BANG, it happened.
Why is this more then 30 seconds long. The 2nd law of thermodynamics is...a law. How is anything identifiable if eternity and that law are true?
The laws of thermodynamics applies to this universe. Without space and time it is pointless.
Everything, Space, Time, Matter and ENERGY…came from NOTHING.
God said that He would make the new universe with a big bang too / A loud roar of fire....
2 Peter 3 "10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything done in it will be laid bare. 11 Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives 12 as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. 13 But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, where righteousness dwells."
Revelation 20 "11 Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them."
Revelation 21 "Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,” for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2 I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Look! God’s dwelling place is now among the people, and he will dwell with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. 4 ‘He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death’ or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”"
Look up the Zodiac code. Pastor Chris Patrick.
If you want to call the big banger god that’s fine…Why though does this god have to be tied to a religious doctrine? There is also very good evidence that Jesus was made up and his story has been told several different times from several different ideologies. Who’s ideology then is the correct one? Jew, Muslim, Hindu or Christian? Each one condemns their non believer to hell. This seems very implausible. That being said, a creator seems quite plausible.
Origin of life is complex question and everyone has right to have his own opinion until experimental proof is available. Just like "the Earth is the center of Universe" things stated by the relegion a century ago.
Experimental proof is not real proof, just supposition. Only the Holy Trinity explains all the evidence.
The "the Earth is the center of Universe", was opinion of secular humanists who may have been religious, & attended a church, but that did not make them Christian, only a relationship with the Lord makes one a Christian.
P.s. its spelt "religion".
Reason from known truths or observation is as valid experimental proof.