I teach this stuff and this is the best explanation of Rayleigh scattering I have ever heard. Missing some important stuff around photoelectric effect (e.g. that the entire photon energy is used to liberate the electron) and pair production (e.g. why it has to occur "near" a nucleus). The way you defined it, photodisintegration and photofission are effectively the same thing.
Your concepts/insights shine a LOT of light on the EU view of the universe! Love your channel and your content! One of my Top Shelf “gotta watch” content creators and lovers of science!
Another awesome presentation as usual. This is the first and only presentation I have seen that even begins to explain the details involved in a way that can help me understand what I could never understand about flight behavior no matter how many of the other explanations I reviewed and red I admit I cannot keep up with the details and the extreme complexity even though your explanations are excellent and clear and concise. I will have to watch this one probably a couple of dozen times before I begin to really understand.
This should be retitled “The latest lesson for mainstream astronomers and cosmologists” to see if they can resolve these facts with their current explanations for their observations.
People told me of the importance of daily meditations and sports. I mean it certainly helps. But it is way more important to watch this video every day :-) Thanks for this great content!
I have one suggestion that is related to what have been discussed till now which is the interaction of light with a complex molecules such as for example the activation of vitamin D in skin by light or the protective effect of sunscreens
Many behaviors of light such as reflection, refraction, diffraction, interference, and polarisation can be demonstrated more clearly using longer wavelength like radio and microwave. That's because the shape of the interacting materials can be easily seen and even manipulated to produce some desired effects.
Would you ever consider a deep dive or a video on lodestone? I feel lodestone maybe a critical point for the electric universe and still to this day a bit mysterious
the broadening in frequency width of spectral lines is similar to broadening wave diffraction patterns that appear as light passes through a slit. The larger the slit, the narrower the diffraction lines, likewise, a smaller slit will produce broader a diffraction pattern.
The photons keep accumulating on my wall, got to scrape them off periodically to deal with the buildup. I might make some photon wipers to help with this problem.
That's why we sleep. For all day our heads are filling with photons through our eyeballs so we must get some sleep after awhile so the photons can find their way out our ears. Otherwise your head would explode.
Very fascinating, though I must admit it's a bit too much- especially when one trying to make sense of it in general understanding of the whole picture.
How do these theories interact the structured atom model? Edit: just saw the part where you said you’ll be talking specifically about this in another video.
I bought yellow sunglasses. It seems like it makes the world appear yellower than it is. Like it doesnt just block the blue light but turns it into yellow. Does it re-emits photons of originally other than yellow/red wavelengths as yellow?
I dont think photons actually ever slow down in any medium. In any case where it seems the photon takes longer to reach the same amount of distance - I would rather believe that the photon is not moving any faster or slower - its just traveling more distance. In a medium the photon takes a much more curvy scenic path before reaching its destination - but along the way it was still moving Exactly at C. Photons can't go below C and can't exceed C. They're stuck at C permanently. They can transform linear C into spinning gyroscopically at C, the can transform spins and frequency indulation into pure linear velocity - but in the end the total amount of motion in a single photon is Always the same for eternity. They move with an infinite and eternal mission and can't stop, wont stop, and dont even know how to stop.
So I wonder-for something to impart kinetic energy it would need to have a tangible mass, wouldn't it? I'm not big on the "wave-particle duality." I like Thornhill's idea that "light needs something to wave" coupled with his "plenum of neutrinos" of low energy and thus low mass. So if a neutrino picks up energy imparted by both longitudinal and transverse collision, could/would that be interpreted as 'light' and 'velocity'? I think that that would satisfy how a traveling neutrino/photon could impart kinetic energy able to officially deflect a particle (transverse) and also have EM energy allowing the photon to be influenced by electric fields. Bear with me please as I'm only an old electronics tech and have no real theoretical training other than being a long-time fan of the Thunderbolts team, but I'd like to ponder out loud to anyone else reading this to chime in if they'd like: doesn't the theorized transverse/longitudinal energy effect on a neutrino seem strikingly similar to the perpendicular nature of electric and magnetic fields? Could it be a relationship of scale? Or perhaps another axis of vibration to a particle? Wal, if you're reading this and you've answered any of this already somewhere else, I'm sorry I missed it! Don't hate me, damnit! 😱
The difference is that photofission is the splitting of a larger atom into smaller chucks which are themselves atoms whereas photo disintegration is the ejection of a proton, neutron, electron or alpha particle. Sorry that was not clear in the video
When you try to push a child on a swing, you can't push at any frequency you like.. it must be synchronised with that of the swing.. this is the reason why light of a certain frequency is needed to eject an electron from orbit.. it is purely classical I am afraid. This is not a criticism of the video which is truly brilliant and very clear.
We use Classical EM, or QM as best suits the observation. And we add the magic of relativistic effect to further correct our theories to suit the observed effect....but we have no idea of what is going on there.
Gareth, what is your view on Juliana Mortgenson's work concerning the definition of the photon? Note that Lori Gardi's channel (Fractal woman) discusses this as well.
Its like we are listening to Professor Dave's physics channel. You forget that all matter has a resonant frequency at which it comes apart or rearranges, from chemical rearrangement to nuclear rearrangement, photon separation, and proton annihilation. This includes the fact that a resonant frequency is involved for both electron ejection and exciting an electron to a higher state. Also putting an electron back into an ionized atom or a position into a "antiproton" plasma, and putting an electron and positron back together to make a photon, a resonant frequency is required. A bit of brushing up on Nikola Tesla's ether, and Newton's evanescent aether medium work, might be a good start to research vs the Einstein failed particle model of light, or Professor Dave's channel. LEDs do not emit photons because light has been proven, especially by the Michelson-Morley Experiment, to be an energy wave in a medium. Lasers cavities by contrast DO emit photons or entangled photons. Photons are the constituent particles of the ether medium. In fact all properties of sound in air as a medium are observed with the ether as a particle medium and light. This includes Faraday rotation with sound in anisotropic air as well as in other anisotropic fluid media. The Shapiro Delay that is observed NASA laser experiments near the Sun, as a function of density and frequency, is also a property of sound in air and energy waves in other fluid media. See Dr. Edward Dowdey.
@@eclipse369. In most regards an energy wave of the medium is also correct. Ditto for a magnetic field. A radio oscillator or an inductor coil condenses and rarefies the ether medium or what Stienmetz called the dielectric. A radio wave is indeed an energy wave both in and of the medium, as a condensation and rarefaction occurs. The solar wind is an outward flow of the ether medium known as the solar wind that drags charged particles with it. The solar wind is a Poynting flux dominated flow that is also known as the Interplanetary Magnetic Field, which was indeed detected by Michelson-Morley and Miller, as well as dozens of other interferometer experiments. But in keeping with energy waves, it is generally stated that the particles of the medium do not move, just oscillate up and down, back and forth, or rotate. However, waves in the water can carry a surfer or other object ashore, just as ice on a lake can be transported onto the shore in the spring. Likewise, light can indeed propel objects as a thruster of sorts. However, energy can be transported from one medium to another without the medium moving, in general. It is the energy wave in the medium that carries the most momentum. A chain reaction of particles bumping into each other, as in Newton's Cradle. An energy wave's speed is dictated by the rigidity and density, AKA particles per volume, of the medium it propagates through, but in general the particles just oscillate or rotate in place. That is why light changes speed through a lens and speeds back up upon exiting. However, there is generally not an exchange of particles between one medium and another as light, or an energy wave, is transmitted through from one medium to another.
I don’t think the EU accepts that Quantum effects are something separate from electromagnetic resonance effects. Anything with Quantum in it is a way to kid themselves on that they can explain it by coming up with possibilities instead of actual single answers. It’s quite literally a video game for nerds. Nothing but virtual math.
The only problem is that all of these examples insinuate that the measurement is taken from a stationary perspective 🤔. May I suggest that it is light that is stationary while the baryonic matter is in motion.
I had a thought experiment💭 "What if black holes are like Grand Recycling Machines ♻️ of the Cosmo's♻️" System's with-in Nature can have a balancing act type ability to convert and transfer energy. Like a ecosystem that keeps cycling energy so natural systems can function.. *I was just thinking how a ecosystem of a forest flourishes due to it's symbiotic relationship with Fungi and mold/lichen, bugs, soil, mycelium, a water source, etc. With the help of the fungi the Forest no longer suffocates itself. The Fungi gets to help breakdown and convert the carbon thats locked away in the forest floor, fallen Tree's, plant matter that's all throughout the soil. On top of that it works together symbiotically with the living plants roots to help them breakdown & absorb nutrients. That plant cant function to that level on its own without the combination relationship of these 2 aspects of nature which keep this ecosystem functioning. This is true in many different ways, in many different types of systems, all throughout nature. A part of me can't help but look at parts of space like that and wonder? Like if certain things in nature work here, then maybe there is a new way we have yet to discover and see how they behave. Aspects that could keep systems functioning throughout nature and space. Some things we are limited to what perspective we can perceive and what we can utilize for further measurements but we can still use our imaginations. Then fine tune things from there 👍🏼 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~{Hypothetical idea}~ What if our universe is 1 half of a sorta ying yang ☯️ universe. 1 side is what we see, the other side could maybe be a Anti-universe. Maybe there could be a membrane layer in-between the 2 layers. Which allows for quantum particles to pop in and out of existence and decay from that membrane with the other half. The 2nd half could be our universe but maybe be an anti-universe. Where anti-particles go? Where the anti-matter can create this balancing act with-in the system of the cosmos. (It doesn't mean there is multiple versions of ourselves and all that stuff when people talk about a multiverse. No, not that.) It's just a thought about a possible natural way to balance things out, yet also describe the fluctuations we see in quantum mechanics. I just had a random daydream thought and obviously I hope more professional people's minds end up diving into this sorta possible theoretical physics. I think Neil Turok had a similar theory. ⚖️ 🌐🧲🌡️🔆☢️⚛️♻️🌐☯️ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🧲🌡️📡🔆☢️🔌🔊🔋♻️☯️⚛️ Out of every aspect of physics, i feel Gravity and all the aspects of Electromagnetism play such a crucial aspect of the cosmos and we possibly have much more to learn about these fields of physics? if you really think about it- It's really facinating how so many properties with-in Nature use: ~{"Differences"}~ That factor seems to be a key factor in keeping dynamic systems functioning. *{High pressure/low pressure, hot/cold temp, different densities, static electric charges/discharges, electromagnetism north/south poles, different velocity/angular momentum, different amounts of energy/mass/frequency/vibrations. The different layers between different regions such as, land, water, air, edge of atmosphere, space, the different regions in space with different particle density, background radiation, creating bubbles/membrane layers, cloud regions, nebula's/ Galaxy's, Galaxy clusters, less dense voids regions of space compared to dense regions of space. All of these things are basic differences but create a way for the dynamic engine with-in Nature to continue flowing and operating to create and convert energy.} Just Like How a battery 🔋 transfers + charges through a membrane layer to a - charged side. Like how regions of high/low pressure and temperature 🌡️differences create winds. In water or a planets core- add some factors and It creates ocean currents and flow. Then internally in our planet it creates plate tectonics, planetary convection, geothermal activity, magnetic field around our planet, to hold a atmosphere. 🧲🌡️📡🔆☢️🔌🔊🔋♻️☯️⚛️ I'm curious if there's more to learn about Gravity ~When it comes to our perspective on observing the Massive scale parts of the Cosmos? Like Entire galaxies/nebula's/filaments & any other diversely complex grand scale objects. They definitely have all sorts of behaviors interacting with-in them. I'm sure those factors need to be improved with how we factor them in to get our calculations of this layer of the Cosmos more accurately accounted for (Maybe it's just "we don't fully understand it yet?")
That is not what classic electromagnetic theory says about the photoelectric effect. What you have stated is what physicists interpretation of classic electromagnetic theory says. The energy packet theory of the photoelectric effect is bunk. Planck was wrong. Einstein was wrong. According to Planck and Einstein each individual wave has the same exact energy per the equation E=hv where E is energy in Joules, h is Planck's constant in Joules*seconds, and v is frequency of light in waves/second, regardless of its frequency and it is only the difference in quantity of wave packets hitting the material that causes electrical currents in photoelectric materials. Thus, by that reasoning, one should be able to create the photoelectric effect with low frequency light of high intensity. That simply does not happen, though. Additionally, per Einstein's theory, light speed is invariable regardless of its frequency. Thus, there can be no mechanical or kinetic reason for light of varying frequencies having variable energy levels. So, if you entertain the opposite of their ridiculous model, you realize that if the speed of light increases with increasing frequency then it naturally follows that higher frequency light has more energy. Moreover, this provides a logical mechanical/kinetic process for the difference in energy levels. All the absurdities created by the Einstein/Planck theory simply fall away.
Instead of deleting this comment, please reply to it and let me know why it's being deleted. Thank you! I don't understand, and I get very confused by the results of the double split and other similar experiments. There are forces around us that act upon protons in this experiment. Also, it seems clear to me that these forces are affected by the apparatuses that are used to observe them. It's clear to me because of the fundamental law of physics that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by a force, a principle articulated by Galileo. This easily correlates with quantum entanglement and its paradoxes, string theory, dark energy, Bell's Theorem, gravity, thermodynamics, Length contraction, Hawking Radiation, Casimir Effect, Compton Scattering, and a host of other subjects. The eraser experiment is about these forces and their effects on the photon…It's very clear to me that the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is not the reason that we can not know both the position and speed of particles, it is because of this dark force. Since Young’s presentation of a famous paper to the Royal Society entitled “On the theory of light and colors” in 1801 and his subsequent famous interference experiment in 1803, light was established to be a wave. About 100 years later, it was realized that light showed behavior characteristics of both wave and particle in the double slit experiment (and its variations) and had become a classic for its clarity in expressing the central puzzles of quantum mechanics. At that time, there was no concept of dark energy. The current concept of dark energy came about in the 1990s. I believe that dark energy is the reason for the wave characteristics of light (particles). What is one of the most fundamental laws of physics, established by Galileo, that a body in motion stays in motion unless acted by a force is the basis of my conclusion. Numerous, if not all, of the characteristics attributed to particles, I believe, are attributable to dark energy. This results in Einstein being correct; the moon is not visible simply because it’s being observed. It’s always present because these forces (dark energy) are not enough to affect its position in space. Just to be clear, double slit and similar experiments are proof of two things. First, it is proof of dark energy. Secondly, it’s proof of the existence of strings. Little, if anything, is known about dark energy. One of the things they know, for sure, about dark energy is that it’s not detectable; it cannot be observed. That’s why they call it dark. As for the proof of the existence of strings, the interference patterns left by double-slit type experiments are characterized as wave-like. Wave-like behaviors are foundational to the definition of string theory. Finally, is the fact that phenomena, wave-like behavior, disappear when apparatuses are used to observe (detect) those experiments. These assertions are further substantiated by the results of the eraser and similar experiments. Remember that the Michelson & Morley (1887) experiment was one of the most sensitive test of its time. Poignantly, it failed to detect any indication of ether wind stemming from “luminiferous ether.” It just wasn't there, completely undetectable. Not a hint. I believe dark energy is a universal uniformed negative Electric/Magnetic monopole structure. I think this accounts for its characteristics. Also, it’s interesting to note that at the time that Einstein identified Brownian motion, string theory did not exist. I feel that if string theory existed at that time, Brownian motion could have been used to substantiate that theory, string theory. Newton, very cleverly, removed the consideration of curvature from his calculations. He did this by using points center of masses. Einstein put curvature back into the calculations. He did this by cleverly introducing the concept of space-time. I, personally, do not believe that light bends around massive objects because of space-time. The light bends around massive objects because light is repelled by mass, as in Hawking Radiation. Additionally, I am confused about the concept of time. I believe that time does not exist when there is only one point, a single point. This is due to the way calculations are done within the framework of Cartesian geometry and not because of physics. There is no place in physics where there is only a single point. Again, and I know that I’m repeating myself, particle physics needs to be transformed into dark energy physics. By identifying matter as having wave-particle characteristics, matter has been mischaracterized. Science needs to be re-focused on the waves observed in the double split and the like, experiments and deemphasize the focus on particles. The concept of wave-particle duality should be abandoned. Schrödinger equation, Probability density function, and, very importantly, Maxwell's equations emanate from dark energy. As a starter, science needs to focus on the waves observed in the double split and similar experiments to determine their minimum and maximum characteristics. This should be done by varying the parameters of the experiments as much as possible. The screen should always be as large as possible. The slit should be as small as possible. The slit should be as far away as possible from the screen. Particles of varying masses and charges should be systematically used. Then all these factors, except fixed conditions, i.e., the results, should be systematically varied and their data recorded and then finally compared and analyzed. Outlier data should not be excluded. This should establish conclusively that a force is responsible for the behavior of the particles and not the inherent behavior of the particles themselves.
It sounds corny 🌽~but~ It almost feels like {You can't have the Cosmo's without Light & You can't have Light unless the Cosmo's is able to function properly.. So a fully pitch black "Functioning Cosmo's" does not seem to be compatible?}
How can can light that leaves a prism accelerate to the same speed it had when entering? It contradicts the law of energy conservation since the prism heats up. Is it in reality the atoms on the surface that emits light due to energy build up and not the energy that enters on the other side of the prism. If you were to put 10 million prisms between the earth and the sun it seem illogical that the light could pass trough maintaining speed unaffected. Either the speed of light should slow down or the amount of light going trough drop significantly. I think light is electricity and therefor it's not photons. Electrons are not moving just pushing each others. Our eyes are just like a copper wire. An electron enters and then goes to the brain through a nerve and heats our brain up like a capacitor. To much sun and you get a heat stroke or destroyed eye. Like photosynthesis the brain converts the energy to vitamins, heat and static electricity that discharges and leave the body. The body is therefor able to create light and this is why we can see our self's. A Chameleon can not see through it's own body yet it mimics the pattern of the surface it's sitting on. The chromatophores in the skin are connected through nerves and the energy transfers from one side to the other and try to regulate the output so it has the same color as the surface.
There is no such thing as a photon. Light is a perturbation in the Aether and is only a wave, not a particle. An electron is also a wave, not a particle. Look deep into it and you will find this to be true.
When you look carefully at their interpretations you realize they are just interpretations and probably not completely correct. A backbone of differential equations with the BS of quantum theology.
If I recall your other videos of this subject: light is merely a disturbance pattern, in the medium, created by plasma filaments, electromagnetic, & thermodynamic energy? How did I do?
Dude your stuff is so technical and so densely packed with info I watch ones like this several times to fully absorb. Thanks for all you do. Gnosis
I teach this stuff and this is the best explanation of Rayleigh scattering I have ever heard. Missing some important stuff around photoelectric effect (e.g. that the entire photon energy is used to liberate the electron) and pair production (e.g. why it has to occur "near" a nucleus). The way you defined it, photodisintegration and photofission are effectively the same thing.
I think i should watch this 10 times to really appreciate it! Thank you Gareth for this mind-blowing video.
Thank you for the explanations of these different phenomena.
Your concepts/insights shine a LOT of light on the EU view of the universe! Love your channel and your content! One of my Top Shelf “gotta watch” content creators and lovers of science!
Thanks for explaining reflections, makes much more sense now.. cheers.
I'm keeping this as a treat for when I'm more awake.
Thanks Gareth. This episode is quite collective and an eye opening piece. Every second of this video worth hours of my time in searching it alone.
This was your Magnus opus. BRAVO, Gentlemen. You're correct, there are other theories to consider.
That green image of resonant scattering is amazing
Another awesome presentation as usual. This is the first and only presentation I have seen that even begins to explain the details involved in a way that can help me understand what I could never understand about flight behavior no matter how many of the other explanations I reviewed and red I admit I cannot keep up with the details and the extreme complexity even though your explanations are excellent and clear and concise. I will have to watch this one probably a couple of dozen times before I begin to really understand.
Wow. Very listenable bite-size nuggets giving quite an overview perspective! Top notch 👍
Many thanks!
Excellent explanation!
The beautiful thing about this video that it can be watched more than once. Keep it up :)
In my case, many times more than once! Highly condensed information content.
@@4n2earth22 indeed, i watched it for the fourth time by now :)
Same here. I have found myself spending more than one afternoon on one of Garth's videos.
This should be retitled “The latest lesson for mainstream astronomers and cosmologists” to see if they can resolve these facts with their current explanations for their observations.
People told me of the importance of daily meditations and sports. I mean it certainly helps. But it is way more important to watch this video every day :-) Thanks for this great content!
I have one suggestion that is related to what have been discussed till now which is the interaction of light with a complex molecules such as for example the activation of vitamin D in skin by light or the protective effect of sunscreens
Many behaviors of light such as reflection, refraction, diffraction, interference, and polarisation can be demonstrated more clearly using longer wavelength like radio and microwave. That's because the shape of the interacting materials can be easily seen and even manipulated to produce some desired effects.
Thanks 👍
🤜🏼⚡️🤛🏻
Nice presentation. Well done.
Now, when you state that light is a wave, can you explain what exactly waves?
Would you ever consider a deep dive or a video on lodestone? I feel lodestone maybe a critical point for the electric universe and still to this day a bit mysterious
the broadening in frequency width of spectral lines is similar to broadening wave diffraction patterns that appear as light passes through a slit. The larger the slit, the narrower the diffraction lines, likewise, a smaller slit will produce broader a diffraction pattern.
The photons keep accumulating on my wall, got to scrape them off periodically to deal with the buildup. I might make some photon wipers to help with this problem.
That's why we sleep.
For all day our heads are filling with photons through our eyeballs so we must get some sleep after awhile so the photons can find their way out our ears.
Otherwise your head would explode.
@@eclipse369. Oh! I thought it was the sleepers.Good idea to keep your ears clean.
Very fascinating, though I must admit it's a bit too much- especially when one trying to make sense of it in general understanding of the whole picture.
why is there is elements that are not detectable by absorption spectroscopy ?
Nice!
because everything you 'see' is a reflection of light
Holy Toolbox, Batman! 🧑🔧
How do these theories interact the structured atom model?
Edit: just saw the part where you said you’ll be talking specifically about this in another video.
Interesting thanks wonderful great interest
I bought yellow sunglasses. It seems like it makes the world appear yellower than it is. Like it doesnt just block the blue light but turns it into yellow. Does it re-emits photons of originally other than yellow/red wavelengths as yellow?
I dont think photons actually ever slow down in any medium. In any case where it seems the photon takes longer to reach the same amount of distance - I would rather believe that the photon is not moving any faster or slower - its just traveling more distance. In a medium the photon takes a much more curvy scenic path before reaching its destination - but along the way it was still moving Exactly at C.
Photons can't go below C and can't exceed C. They're stuck at C permanently. They can transform linear C into spinning gyroscopically at C, the can transform spins and frequency indulation into pure linear velocity - but in the end the total amount of motion in a single photon is Always the same for eternity. They move with an infinite and eternal mission and can't stop, wont stop, and dont even know how to stop.
So I wonder-for something to impart kinetic energy it would need to have a tangible mass, wouldn't it? I'm not big on the "wave-particle duality." I like Thornhill's idea that "light needs something to wave" coupled with his "plenum of neutrinos" of low energy and thus low mass.
So if a neutrino picks up energy imparted by both longitudinal and transverse collision, could/would that be interpreted as 'light' and 'velocity'? I think that that would satisfy how a traveling neutrino/photon could impart kinetic energy able to officially deflect a particle (transverse) and also have EM energy allowing the photon to be influenced by electric fields.
Bear with me please as I'm only an old electronics tech and have no real theoretical training other than being a long-time fan of the Thunderbolts team, but I'd like to ponder out loud to anyone else reading this to chime in if they'd like: doesn't the theorized transverse/longitudinal energy effect on a neutrino seem strikingly similar to the perpendicular nature of electric and magnetic fields? Could it be a relationship of scale? Or perhaps another axis of vibration to a particle?
Wal, if you're reading this and you've answered any of this already somewhere else, I'm sorry I missed it! Don't hate me, damnit! 😱
So Photodisintegration and Photofission are the same? If not which is the difference?
The difference is that photofission is the splitting of a larger atom into smaller chucks which are themselves atoms whereas photo disintegration is the ejection of a proton, neutron, electron or alpha particle. Sorry that was not clear in the video
@@SeethePattern Thx
Hope this information is going to help you produce some sort of "free" energy device.
Looks like there could be shock wave forms in light particles as well.
Was reading, if enough photons were to occupy the same space, it would create a back hole.
When you try to push a child on a swing, you can't push at any frequency you like.. it must be synchronised with that of the swing.. this is the reason why light of a certain frequency is needed to eject an electron from orbit.. it is purely classical I am afraid. This is not a criticism of the video which is truly brilliant and very clear.
We use Classical EM, or QM as best suits the observation. And we add the magic of relativistic effect to further correct our theories to suit the observed effect....but we have no idea of what is going on there.
Gareth, what is your view on Juliana Mortgenson's work concerning the definition of the photon? Note that Lori Gardi's channel (Fractal woman) discusses this as well.
I made a discrete emission 😉watching this
Its like we are listening to Professor Dave's physics channel.
You forget that all matter has a resonant frequency at which it comes apart or rearranges, from chemical rearrangement to nuclear rearrangement, photon separation, and proton annihilation. This includes the fact that a resonant frequency is involved for both electron ejection and exciting an electron to a higher state. Also putting an electron back into an ionized atom or a position into a "antiproton" plasma, and putting an electron and positron back together to make a photon, a resonant frequency is required.
A bit of brushing up on Nikola Tesla's ether, and Newton's evanescent aether medium work, might be a good start to research vs the Einstein failed particle model of light, or Professor Dave's channel.
LEDs do not emit photons because light has been proven, especially by the Michelson-Morley Experiment, to be an energy wave in a medium. Lasers cavities by contrast DO emit photons or entangled photons. Photons are the constituent particles of the ether medium.
In fact all properties of sound in air as a medium are observed with the ether as a particle medium and light. This includes Faraday rotation with sound in anisotropic air as well as in other anisotropic fluid media.
The Shapiro Delay that is observed NASA laser experiments near the Sun, as a function of density and frequency, is also a property of sound in air and energy waves in other fluid media. See Dr. Edward Dowdey.
Energy wave OF the medium
@@eclipse369. In most regards an energy wave of the medium is also correct. Ditto for a magnetic field.
A radio oscillator or an inductor coil condenses and rarefies the ether medium or what Stienmetz called the dielectric.
A radio wave is indeed an energy wave both in and of the medium, as a condensation and rarefaction occurs.
The solar wind is an outward flow of the ether medium known as the solar wind that drags charged particles with it. The solar wind is a Poynting flux dominated flow that is also known as the Interplanetary Magnetic Field, which was indeed detected by Michelson-Morley and Miller, as well as dozens of other interferometer experiments.
But in keeping with energy waves, it is generally stated that the particles of the medium do not move, just oscillate up and down, back and forth, or rotate. However, waves in the water can carry a surfer or other object ashore, just as ice on a lake can be transported onto the shore in the spring. Likewise, light can indeed propel objects as a thruster of sorts.
However, energy can be transported from one medium to another without the medium moving, in general. It is the energy wave in the medium that carries the most momentum. A chain reaction of particles bumping into each other, as in Newton's Cradle.
An energy wave's speed is dictated by the rigidity and density, AKA particles per volume, of the medium it propagates through, but in general the particles just oscillate or rotate in place. That is why light changes speed through a lens and speeds back up upon exiting.
However, there is generally not an exchange of particles between one medium and another as light, or an energy wave, is transmitted through from one medium to another.
Thanks
So when do we get to the Quantum universe so you can tell us to forget everything we have learned lol. Thanks! ;-)
As above, so below...
As within, so without 💜
Comme ci, comme ca
I don’t think the EU accepts that Quantum effects are something separate from electromagnetic resonance effects. Anything with Quantum in it is a way to kid themselves on that they can explain it by coming up with possibilities instead of actual single answers. It’s quite literally a video game for nerds. Nothing but virtual math.
How can anyone learn of this stuff and not think it's all carefully calibrated by an intelligence? It's soooo obvious.
It must be that they somehow have an intentional blind eye that they use to gaze upon the evidence.
The only problem is that all of these examples insinuate that the measurement is taken from a stationary perspective 🤔. May I suggest that it is light that is stationary while the baryonic matter is in motion.
random question can you create a time boom comparable to a sonic boom?
I had a thought experiment💭 "What if black holes are like Grand Recycling Machines ♻️ of the Cosmo's♻️" System's with-in Nature can have a balancing act type ability to convert and transfer energy. Like a ecosystem that keeps cycling energy so natural systems can function.. *I was just thinking how a ecosystem of a forest flourishes due to it's symbiotic relationship with Fungi and mold/lichen, bugs, soil, mycelium, a water source, etc. With the help of the fungi the Forest no longer suffocates itself. The Fungi gets to help breakdown and convert the carbon thats locked away in the forest floor, fallen Tree's, plant matter that's all throughout the soil. On top of that it works together symbiotically with the living plants roots to help them breakdown & absorb nutrients. That plant cant function to that level on its own without the combination relationship of these 2 aspects of nature which keep this ecosystem functioning. This is true in many different ways, in many different types of systems, all throughout nature. A part of me can't help but look at parts of space like that and wonder? Like if certain things in nature work here, then maybe there is a new way we have yet to discover and see how they behave. Aspects that could keep systems functioning throughout nature and space. Some things we are limited to what perspective we can perceive and what we can utilize for further measurements but we can still use our imaginations. Then fine tune things from there 👍🏼
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~{Hypothetical idea}~
What if our universe is 1 half of a sorta ying yang ☯️ universe. 1 side is what we see, the other side could maybe be a Anti-universe. Maybe there could be a membrane layer in-between the 2 layers. Which allows for quantum particles to pop in and out of existence and decay from that membrane with the other half. The 2nd half could be our universe but maybe be an anti-universe. Where anti-particles go? Where the anti-matter can create this balancing act with-in the system of the cosmos. (It doesn't mean there is multiple versions of ourselves and all that stuff when people talk about a multiverse. No, not that.) It's just a thought about a possible natural way to balance things out, yet also describe the fluctuations we see in quantum mechanics. I just had a random daydream thought and obviously I hope more professional people's minds end up diving into this sorta possible theoretical physics. I think Neil Turok had a similar theory.
⚖️ 🌐🧲🌡️🔆☢️⚛️♻️🌐☯️
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
🧲🌡️📡🔆☢️🔌🔊🔋♻️☯️⚛️
Out of every aspect of physics, i feel Gravity and all the aspects of Electromagnetism play such a crucial aspect of the cosmos and we possibly have much more to learn about these fields of physics? if you really think about it- It's really facinating how so many properties with-in Nature use: ~{"Differences"}~
That factor seems to be a key factor in keeping dynamic systems functioning. *{High pressure/low pressure, hot/cold temp, different densities, static electric charges/discharges, electromagnetism north/south poles, different velocity/angular momentum, different amounts of energy/mass/frequency/vibrations. The different layers between different regions such as, land, water, air, edge of atmosphere, space, the different regions in space with different particle density, background radiation, creating bubbles/membrane layers, cloud regions, nebula's/ Galaxy's, Galaxy clusters, less dense voids regions of space compared to dense regions of space. All of these things are basic differences but create a way for the dynamic engine with-in Nature to continue flowing and operating to create and convert energy.} Just Like How a battery 🔋 transfers + charges through a membrane layer to a - charged side. Like how regions of high/low pressure and temperature 🌡️differences create winds. In water or a planets core- add some factors and It creates ocean currents and flow. Then internally in our planet it creates plate tectonics, planetary convection, geothermal activity, magnetic field around our planet, to hold a atmosphere.
🧲🌡️📡🔆☢️🔌🔊🔋♻️☯️⚛️
I'm curious if there's more to learn about Gravity ~When it comes to our perspective on observing the Massive scale parts of the Cosmos? Like Entire galaxies/nebula's/filaments & any other diversely complex grand scale objects. They definitely have all sorts of behaviors interacting with-in them. I'm sure those factors need to be improved with how we factor them in to get our calculations of this layer of the Cosmos more accurately accounted for (Maybe it's just "we don't fully understand it yet?")
That is not what classic electromagnetic theory says about the photoelectric effect. What you have stated is what physicists interpretation of classic electromagnetic theory says. The energy packet theory of the photoelectric effect is bunk. Planck was wrong. Einstein was wrong. According to Planck and Einstein each individual wave has the same exact energy per the equation E=hv where E is energy in Joules, h is Planck's constant in Joules*seconds, and v is frequency of light in waves/second, regardless of its frequency and it is only the difference in quantity of wave packets hitting the material that causes electrical currents in photoelectric materials. Thus, by that reasoning, one should be able to create the photoelectric effect with low frequency light of high intensity. That simply does not happen, though. Additionally, per Einstein's theory, light speed is invariable regardless of its frequency. Thus, there can be no mechanical or kinetic reason for light of varying frequencies having variable energy levels. So, if you entertain the opposite of their ridiculous model, you realize that if the speed of light increases with increasing frequency then it naturally follows that higher frequency light has more energy. Moreover, this provides a logical mechanical/kinetic process for the difference in energy levels. All the absurdities created by the Einstein/Planck theory simply fall away.
These conventional models are OK, but a true explanation requires being able to convert everything to Aether perturbations.
Sounds like a great video but to technical for my brain
Instead of deleting this comment, please reply to it and let me know why it's being deleted. Thank you!
I don't understand, and I get very confused by the results of the double split and other similar experiments. There are forces around us that act upon protons in this experiment. Also, it seems clear to me that these forces are affected by the apparatuses that are used to observe them. It's clear to me because of the fundamental law of physics that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by a force, a principle articulated by Galileo. This easily correlates with quantum entanglement and its paradoxes, string theory, dark energy, Bell's Theorem, gravity, thermodynamics, Length contraction, Hawking Radiation, Casimir Effect, Compton Scattering, and a host of other subjects. The eraser experiment is about these forces and their effects on the photon…It's very clear to me that the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is not the reason that we can not know both the position and speed of particles, it is because of this dark force.
Since Young’s presentation of a famous paper to the Royal Society entitled “On the theory of light and colors” in 1801 and his subsequent famous interference experiment in 1803, light was established to be a wave. About 100 years later, it was realized that light showed behavior characteristics of both wave and particle in the double slit experiment (and its variations) and had become a classic for its clarity in expressing the central puzzles of quantum mechanics. At that time, there was no concept of dark energy. The current concept of dark energy came about in the 1990s. I believe that dark energy is the reason for the wave characteristics of light (particles). What is one of the most fundamental laws of physics, established by Galileo, that a body in motion stays in motion unless acted by a force is the basis of my conclusion. Numerous, if not all, of the characteristics attributed to particles, I believe, are attributable to dark energy. This results in Einstein being correct; the moon is not visible simply because it’s being observed. It’s always present because these forces (dark energy) are not enough to affect its position in space.
Just to be clear, double slit and similar experiments are proof of two things. First, it is proof of dark energy. Secondly, it’s proof of the existence of strings. Little, if anything, is known about dark energy. One of the things they know, for sure, about dark energy is that it’s not detectable; it cannot be observed. That’s why they call it dark. As for the proof of the existence of strings, the interference patterns left by double-slit type experiments are characterized as wave-like. Wave-like behaviors are foundational to the definition of string theory. Finally, is the fact that phenomena, wave-like behavior, disappear when apparatuses are used to observe (detect) those experiments. These assertions are further substantiated by the results of the eraser and similar experiments. Remember that the Michelson & Morley (1887) experiment was one of the most sensitive test of its time. Poignantly, it failed to detect any indication of ether wind stemming from “luminiferous ether.” It just wasn't there, completely undetectable. Not a hint. I believe dark energy is a universal uniformed negative Electric/Magnetic monopole structure. I think this accounts for its characteristics. Also, it’s interesting to note that at the time that Einstein identified Brownian motion, string theory did not exist. I feel that if string theory existed at that time, Brownian motion could have been used to substantiate that theory, string theory.
Newton, very cleverly, removed the consideration of curvature from his calculations. He did this by using points center of masses. Einstein put curvature back into the calculations. He did this by cleverly introducing the concept of space-time. I, personally, do not believe that light bends around massive objects because of space-time. The light bends around massive objects because light is repelled by mass, as in Hawking Radiation. Additionally, I am confused about the concept of time. I believe that time does not exist when there is only one point, a single point. This is due to the way calculations are done within the framework of Cartesian geometry and not because of physics. There is no place in physics where there is only a single point.
Again, and I know that I’m repeating myself, particle physics needs to be transformed into dark energy physics. By identifying matter as having wave-particle characteristics, matter has been mischaracterized. Science needs to be re-focused on the waves observed in the double split and the like, experiments and deemphasize the focus on particles. The concept of wave-particle duality should be abandoned. Schrödinger equation, Probability density function, and, very importantly, Maxwell's equations emanate from dark energy.
As a starter, science needs to focus on the waves observed in the double split and similar experiments to determine their minimum and maximum characteristics. This should be done by varying the parameters of the experiments as much as possible. The screen should always be as large as possible. The slit should be as small as possible. The slit should be as far away as possible from the screen. Particles of varying masses and charges should be systematically used. Then all these factors, except fixed conditions, i.e., the results, should be systematically varied and their data recorded and then finally compared and analyzed. Outlier data should not be excluded. This should establish conclusively that a force is responsible for the behavior of the particles and not the inherent behavior of the particles themselves.
No Such Thing As Particles , Only Hopf Fibrations . 🐇
MATTER HAS A FINGERPRINT THAT RESPONDS TO LIGHT FREQUENCIES UNIQUUELY
How the heck do you get all this information? Are you the smartest person on the planet? Seems like.
No most certainly not but I really want to try and understand how things work in ways that make sense (well as much as possible :))
@@SeethePattern Well, thank you for sharing your curiosity with us.
your photon is expressed visually as a wave..so is a photon a particle,or a wave...lol,i know ,thats the big queztion
Do you have a degree in Physics? What are your qualifications?
It sounds corny 🌽~but~ It almost feels like {You can't have the Cosmo's without Light & You can't have Light unless the Cosmo's is able to function properly.. So a fully pitch black "Functioning Cosmo's" does not seem to be compatible?}
How can can light that leaves a prism accelerate to the same speed it had when entering? It contradicts the law of energy conservation since the prism heats up. Is it in reality the atoms on the surface that emits light due to energy build up and not the energy that enters on the other side of the prism. If you were to put 10 million prisms between the earth and the sun it seem illogical that the light could pass trough maintaining speed unaffected. Either the speed of light should slow down or the amount of light going trough drop significantly. I think light is electricity and therefor it's not photons. Electrons are not moving just pushing each others. Our eyes are just like a copper wire. An electron enters and then goes to the brain through a nerve and heats our brain up like a capacitor. To much sun and you get a heat stroke or destroyed eye. Like photosynthesis the brain converts the energy to vitamins, heat and static electricity that discharges and leave the body. The body is therefor able to create light and this is why we can see our self's. A Chameleon can not see through it's own body yet it mimics the pattern of the surface it's sitting on. The chromatophores in the skin are connected through nerves and the energy transfers from one side to the other and try to regulate the output so it has the same color as the surface.
Whatever happens, keep your faith in Jesus Christ, and in yourself!
There is no such thing as a photon. Light is a perturbation in the Aether and is only a wave, not a particle. An electron is also a wave, not a particle. Look deep into it and you will find this to be true.
You need to know what they think or you’ll risk thinking the same thing😂
When you look carefully at their interpretations you realize they are just interpretations and probably not completely correct. A backbone of differential equations with the BS of quantum theology.
If I recall your other videos of this subject: light is merely a disturbance pattern, in the medium, created by plasma filaments, electromagnetic, & thermodynamic energy?
How did I do?
I just scattered my pants after seeing this