Paul Dempsey (Something for Kate) - 'Waste Our Breath' (solo acoustic from 'The Modern Medieval')

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • Recorded and mixed by Mark D’Angelo at Backlot Studios. Taken from the album, 'The Modern Medieval'
    Subscribe to Something For Kate's UA-cam channel bit.ly/SFKsubsc...
    Find Something For Kate's music across all digital platforms here: SomethingForKa...
    Follow Something For Kate on:
    Facebook: / sfkband
    Twitter: / sfkband
    Instagram: / somethingforkate
    Spotify: spoti.fi/1cmJweY
    Soundcloud: / something-for-kate
    Google+: plus.google.co...
    Website: somethingforkat...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @mattthornton5216
    @mattthornton5216 Рік тому

    Stunning, just beautiful music. I wish I could 'like' this over and over.

  • @MulusLakus
    @MulusLakus 3 роки тому +6

    No doubt, the best song of 2020.
    Thank you so much for this acoustic version🤗

  • @eclipse7134
    @eclipse7134 3 роки тому +2

    Fuck I love this song!!

  • @stevei-c8739
    @stevei-c8739 3 роки тому +1

    Favourite track on the album, Paul really putting his heart and soul into this performance.

  • @barrybadeve9028
    @barrybadeve9028 3 роки тому

    Wow.

  • @matvelous
    @matvelous 3 роки тому

    Wow, just wow. Beautiful music again from SFK

  • @Draxon_blades
    @Draxon_blades 3 роки тому

    Love this. So much. Thanks Paul. 👌

  • @annemarieneylan641
    @annemarieneylan641 3 роки тому

    Strong song individualistic and fresh

  • @wiggie87
    @wiggie87 3 роки тому

    Cheers! Merry Christmas!

  • @The_-_Futurist24
    @The_-_Futurist24 3 роки тому

    Love it :) gf got me special edition of sfk modern medieval for xmas! The best!! :)

  • @TheNauta87
    @TheNauta87 3 роки тому

    Muito bom mesmo! Meu compositor favorito!

  • @Sagittarius-81
    @Sagittarius-81 3 роки тому

    He can still reach high with his voice, even though he's ageing. I'm reminded (and yet, encouraged to the contrary) of how Bob Dylan never did keep reaching.
    You're a wise man, Paul. And, honourable.

    • @Sagittarius-81
      @Sagittarius-81 3 роки тому

      I'm not sure I've quoted this in a SFK thread, but here goes:
      62
      Tao has of all things the most honoured place.
      No treasures give good men so rich a grace;
      Bad men it guards, and doth their ill efface.
      (Its) admirable words can purchase honour; (its) admirable deeds
      can raise their performer above others. Even men who are not good are not abandoned by it.
      Therefore when the sovereign occupies his place as the Son of
      Heaven, and he has appointed his three ducal ministers, though (a prince) were to send in a round symbol-of-rank large enough to fill both the hands, and that as the precursor of the team of horses (in the court-yard), such an offering would not be equal to (a lesson of) this Tao, which one might present on his knees.
      Why was it that the ancients prized this Tao so much? Was it not
      because it could be got by seeking for it, and the guilty could escape (from the stain of their guilt) by it? This is the reason why all under heaven consider it the most valuable thing.

    • @Sagittarius-81
      @Sagittarius-81 3 роки тому

      62 can't go without 38
      (Those who) possessed in highest degree the attributes (of the Tao) did not (seek) to show them, and therefore they possessed them (in fullest measure). (Those who) possessed in a lower degree those attributes (sought how) not to lose them, and therefore they did not possess them (in fullest measure).
      (Those who) possessed in the highest degree those attributes did nothing (with a purpose), and had no need to do anything. (Those who) possessed them in a lower degree were (always) doing, and had need to be so doing.
      (Those who) possessed the highest benevolence were (always seeking) to carry it out, and had no need to be doing so. (Those who) possessed the highest righteousness were (always seeking) to carry it out, and had need to be so doing.
      (Those who) possessed the highest (sense of) propriety were (always seeking) to show it, and when men did not respond to it, they bared the arm and marched up to them.
      Thus it was that when the Tao was lost, its attributes appeared; when its attributes were lost, benevolence appeared; when benevolence was lost, righteousness appeared; and when righteousness was lost, the proprieties appeared.
      Now propriety is the attenuated form of leal-heartedness and good faith, and is also the commencement of disorder; swift apprehension is (only) a flower of the Tao, and is the beginning of stupidity.
      Thus it is that the Great man abides by what is solid, and eschews what is flimsy; dwells with the fruit and not with the flower. It is thus that he puts away the one and makes choice of the other.

    • @vjm5246
      @vjm5246 3 роки тому +1

      Hi Tim, Paul has the correct singing technique whereas Dylan used his speaking voice to sing. Singing and talking are like swimming and running - they are both exercises but completely different.
      This means Paul's voice will get better with age as his coordination will be refined ever so slightly over time. Have a look at Robert Smith from the cure - he can also sing,

    • @Sagittarius-81
      @Sagittarius-81 3 роки тому +1

      @@vjm5246 Thanks for the reply.

  • @leahhammond410
    @leahhammond410 3 роки тому

    Copy that... how she found out.. she read books on every subject.. anomalies recognise anomalies... 200,000 years of running sims... sounds heavy.. you are an amazing songwriter by the way.. hope to see you live while im still here..

  • @PeterStrachanMusic
    @PeterStrachanMusic 3 роки тому

    Nice vocal OK tune