Why VAR is Ruining Football!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • Remember the good old days when we could celebrate a goal without having to wait 5 minutes to see if the striker’s nose was offside? Ah, we sure miss those simpler times.
    VAR was supposed to make football better. So far, it’s only made things worse.
    From inconsistent decisions to lengthy delays, here are 5 reasons why VAR is ruining football.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 336

  • @SSWAZZY
    @SSWAZZY 3 роки тому +266

    i just talked with my brother about VAR and he said
    "the problem is not VAR its the donkey who uses it"

    • @anuragparashar9407
      @anuragparashar9407 3 роки тому +27

      It's a donkey's tool mate

    • @Camo1x
      @Camo1x 3 роки тому +7

      Not really, it's in the name itself, video assistant referee, so stupid var man

    • @carljohnson9057
      @carljohnson9057 2 роки тому +2

      عنزي

    • @mayditg2122
      @mayditg2122 2 роки тому

      If he said that in Arabic that would be jokes

    • @SSWAZZY
      @SSWAZZY 2 роки тому +1

      @@mayditg2122 yeah he said it in arabic
      Arabic is my language

  • @lucamancini6724
    @lucamancini6724 3 роки тому +176

    Spot on with this. I really miss football from 3-4 years ago

    • @19555
      @19555 3 роки тому +6

      Bet ur ten

    • @999THUGSSHAMILMUSHRIFMUJAB
      @999THUGSSHAMILMUSHRIFMUJAB 3 роки тому +1

      Ya

    • @jonasmuste3232
      @jonasmuste3232 2 роки тому

      You’re welcome with VAR, (I’m Dutch)

    • @check6404
      @check6404 2 роки тому +2

      @@19555 bet your ten, but ten year olds don’t use punctuation in their comments. So I’m sold that he’s not.

    • @Umrz749
      @Umrz749 2 роки тому

      @@check6404 your grammar
      ;)

  • @magicsteve5523
    @magicsteve5523 3 роки тому +36

    The worst VAR call I’ve ever seen was that penalty in the Liverpool V Brighton game, Andy Robertson accidentally hit someone’s foot while trying to win the ball back. A light tap to the foot resulted in a penalty.

    • @magicsteve5523
      @magicsteve5523 3 роки тому +1

      @Oscar Skuza Ice hockey isn’t safe either, the Calgary Flames were robbed of their second Stanley Cup by a bad call.

    • @andowalsh
      @andowalsh 3 роки тому

      Yeah , when Danny Wellbeck gets accidentally touched then stays on his feet with his eyes on the ref long enough so that he gets seen falling over, Andy Robertson had no intention of comitting the contact as his eyes were clearly on the ball but Wellbeck nicked it away at the last split second.. there is absolutely no context in descision makeng when things like this happen, it was 100% unintentional.. the worst thing now is players who hand ball when turning their backs, half will say it was handball because they had not been looking and half will say not handball because they couldnt see the ball..

    • @JereLFC
      @JereLFC 3 роки тому +1

      @@magicsteve5523 and in columbus carolina game that offside goal that columbus got a 2 min penalty for delay of the game even when they were right

  • @sourswift
    @sourswift 3 роки тому +48

    If you told people in the late 1900’s that we would rule people offside for being offside because of someone’s nose they would call you crazy, well...

    • @manangupta3357
      @manangupta3357 3 роки тому +11

      if a ref actually shows a flag due to a event like that the player would have knocked him out in 1900

    • @NathanAlderGigaBITNate
      @NathanAlderGigaBITNate 2 роки тому +1

      He’s exaggerating slightly in the video. A nose won’t be ruled out

    • @maxmustermann3876
      @maxmustermann3876 2 роки тому

      What's better? Rule people offside for being 5cm offside (VAR) or rule people offside even though they were 10cm inside (no VAR).
      The problem is the offside rule, not VAR

    • @absurd7292
      @absurd7292 2 роки тому

      yes

    • @letthereberock8637
      @letthereberock8637 2 роки тому

      Im sorry but thats the f***ing offside rule thats what the rule is and if the VAR enforce sthe rule (even half a foot length, thats fucking offside) then thats good imo

  • @Pedro-ze6mp
    @Pedro-ze6mp 2 роки тому +93

    The truth is: VAR is just bad when it interfers in the game of our team.

  • @r3peatt464
    @r3peatt464 3 роки тому +69

    In my opinion VAR should only be used in penalties and in occasions where the ref wants to

    • @GrinViz
      @GrinViz 3 роки тому +16

      Var as a whole is good. But decision making is slow and offside law is simply crap. It need a change thats for sure.

    • @NathanAlderGigaBITNate
      @NathanAlderGigaBITNate 2 роки тому

      I doubt refs will willingly want to use the VAR, it would make their judgment seem less credible

    • @emmettg7490
      @emmettg7490 2 роки тому +1

      I think coaches should get 2 VAR refutes a game. Otherwise, it shouldn't be in the sport, besides as you say; when a ref requests it explicitly.

    • @manh385
      @manh385 Рік тому

      ​@@GrinViz
      Arsene wenger's proposal of On side is a better one. In this, even a attacking player's backside also can be considered to be on side when it on the line of defender rather than a attacker needs to be "in" by his full body.
      By this proposal, backside of a attacking players include Head, Torso and Thigh only need to be on side.
      But I think we need to avoid Arms, Stud and Shank ( lower part of legs [ upper part of legs is Thigh ] ) to being considered for on side. Otherwise, it is difficult to a defender to catch up a attacker if we consider like, stud of boot to be onside ( Eg Mbappe 😂 )

    • @900stx7
      @900stx7 Рік тому

      ​@@emmettg7490 That's how it is with American football.
      Each team is allowed a set amount of challenges during a game. If the video challenge is lost, the team loses a timeout.
      The refs actually review every score, but there's a time limit that makes the process run smoothly.
      It's not perfect but much better than the old way.

  • @snugarcher
    @snugarcher 3 роки тому +58

    I liked the good old days
    WHEN FIRMINOS ARM PIT WASN'T OFFSIDE

  • @DanyangSong
    @DanyangSong 2 роки тому +12

    Yeah, I also think that offside rule is getting too strict, even beyond human perception!

  • @ultima513.
    @ultima513. 2 роки тому +26

    Offside should only count when the full body is offside imo

    • @TheRealPingu
      @TheRealPingu 2 роки тому +3

      Create your own sport. Football has always been the way it is.

    • @ultima513.
      @ultima513. 2 роки тому +8

      @@TheRealPingu ... Just no... like literally just no.

    • @m4rkscott
      @m4rkscott 2 роки тому +1

      the ball should only be over the line if its at least a clear foot over the line , lmfao

    • @user-lj6jp8qp7z
      @user-lj6jp8qp7z 2 роки тому

      I hate VAR but sorry what you just said made 0 sense. The only body part that doesn't count as offside is your arm to your hands. Any other body part, its offside.

    • @user-lj6jp8qp7z
      @user-lj6jp8qp7z 2 роки тому

      @@ultima513. Go and learn the offside rule mate

  • @user-lj6jp8qp7z
    @user-lj6jp8qp7z 2 роки тому +2

    I have decided to stop watching football after 22 years. Not until VAR is gone from football, I won't be watching it again.

  • @magicsteve5523
    @magicsteve5523 3 роки тому +13

    Refs are prone to bad calls due to subjective decisions, VAR is not an exception to this rule.

    • @m4rkscott
      @m4rkscott 2 роки тому

      it is more accurate though

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

      @@m4rkscott Depends of what you mean by more accurate. Personally, I am not a fan of great goals being ruled out because the player's toenails were offside. It feels like the game is being refereed by robots who don't know a thing about how the sport is played.

    • @m4rkscott
      @m4rkscott 2 роки тому

      @@GermanicusCaesar117 Yes but there has got to be a line that you accept and when that is established you may disagree with a toe nail over that line

  • @Philsta007
    @Philsta007 3 роки тому +19

    VAR is necessary to prevent players benefitting from diving. The blame should be placed squarely at the feet of perpetual divers, though FIFA have allowed them to go unpunished for years. The diving in the 2018 World Cup was an utter farce in some games, yet not even ONE player was booked for it in the whole tournament.
    The offside situation with VAR is absolutely ridiculous though, but FIFA could fix that tomorrow though if they wanted to. Just change the offside rule to say that there needs to be daylight between the two players.

    • @Alexander_Tronstad
      @Alexander_Tronstad 2 роки тому +3

      I suggest just removing the offside-rule alltogether but give the keeper leisure to beat up people within the 16-meter. Problem solved.

    • @Philsta007
      @Philsta007 2 роки тому +1

      @pit lord The sport is called SOCCER... and no, diving is cheating and is a disgrace. Cheating is never acceptable.

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому +1

      "VAR is necessary to prevent players benefitting from diving"
      "The diving in the 2018 World Cup was an utter farce in some games, yet not even ONE player was booked for it in the whole tournament."
      You kinda contradicted yourself here. Last time I check, that World Cup had VAR. You can even argue that it played a big part throughout the whole tournament since that World Cup had the most amount of penalties given by quite a bit.

    • @Philsta007
      @Philsta007 2 роки тому

      @@GermanicusCaesar117 VAR would be fine if diving players could be booked as a result of the VAR review.

    • @manh385
      @manh385 Рік тому

      ​@@Philsta007
      Arsene wenger's proposal of On side is a better one. In this, even a attacking player's backside also can be considered to be on side when it on the line of defender rather than a attacker needs to be "in" by his full body.
      By this proposal, backside of a attacking players include Head, Torso and Thigh only need to be on side.
      But I think we need to avoid Arms, Stud and Shank ( lower part of legs [ upper part of legs is Thigh ] ) to being considered for on side. Otherwise, it is difficult to a defender to catch up a attacker if we consider like, stud of boot to be onside ( Eg Mbappe 😂 )

  • @thatguyinthathat.s6969
    @thatguyinthathat.s6969 3 роки тому +18

    Most of the VAR problems is the offside, and penalties given for absolutely nothing. Fix those two things and VAR is good. For instance Connor Coady diving yesterday, and then VAR correcting the decision was a great example of VAR working.
    ANOTHER solution is like American Football.. I know I know... BUT listen.
    NFL challenge rules allow for two challenges for each team during a game. A third challenge can be awarded to a team only if they are successful in both of their previous challenges. If one or both of those challenges is denied, then the team does not get a third challenge.
    What can be challenged is also limited. THIS will also shut up managers complaining a little bit....maybe. haha.
    This would limit the number of stoppages.. if the refs missed it. The manager can ask to challenge it, then... and only then VAR should come into play. Some other things, like off the ball violent conduct... should be automatic stoppage and review.

    • @alpz2490
      @alpz2490 3 роки тому +3

      Agree with this, along with slight rule modifications to offside rule, similar to what's going on in Holland, where attacker gets extra 10mm. The real problem is the reffing quality is continually dropping

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

      For real, ditching the way VAR is being used right now and changing it to a challenge system in which a manager can challenge certain refereeing decisions would be much better for the flow of the game.

    • @manh385
      @manh385 Рік тому

      ​@@alpz2490
      Arsene wenger's proposal of On side is a better one. In this, even a attacking player's backside also can be considered to be on side when it on the line of defender rather than a attacker needs to be "in" by his full body.
      By this proposal, backside of a attacking players include Head, Torso and Thigh only need to be on side.
      But I think we need to avoid Arms, Stud and Shank ( lower part of legs [ upper part of legs is Thigh ] ) to being considered for on side. Otherwise, it is difficult to a defender to catch up a attacker if we consider like, stud of boot to be onside ( Eg Mbappe 😂 )

  • @AzakielRuns
    @AzakielRuns 2 роки тому +5

    When I clicked play I had to wait for 5 minutes because VAR had to look if the video was offside or not.

  • @dountking9831
    @dountking9831 2 роки тому +19

    They should keep goal line technology but take away VAR

    • @chiko_djuro8150
      @chiko_djuro8150 Рік тому +1

      Nema ni to smisla baš, ako lopta dodiruje zemlju unutar gola onda je gol i ne gleda se bočni dio lopte
      Kakva je to logika?

  • @thecure4470
    @thecure4470 3 роки тому +43

    Var should have 10 seconds to relook at the issue, if it goes past, the refs decision is final.....simples

    • @prathamramchandani9432
      @prathamramchandani9432 2 роки тому +3

      Like cricket you can take DRS( decision reviewing system)in under 14 seconds.

    • @Alexandroid187
      @Alexandroid187 2 роки тому +4

      So the make false decisions because of time pressure . Noice

    • @thecure4470
      @thecure4470 2 роки тому

      @@Alexandroid187 see how quick they make decisions at the euros, pay attention!

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

      Or they can do an American football style challenge system in which the coaches have a set amount of "challenge" they can use (3 seems reasonable). Also, the coaches only have 20 seconds after that play to make the challenge. Afterwards the ref's decision is final. If the challenge is successful, the team will gain an additional challenge that they can use.

  • @robertt9342
    @robertt9342 2 роки тому

    What I’d like to see is after the game reviews of plays to see if a player dives or embellishes. It doesn’t interfere with the games and only the obvious and most egregious get suspensions. Hopefully it will either cut down on dives or make them better actor.

  • @brucewayne79825
    @brucewayne79825 2 роки тому +7

    I think we should improve VAR and those guys behind it

  • @somedude2808
    @somedude2808 2 роки тому +3

    They should do it like the nfl where is a car but you only (almost only) use it when a team throws the red flag and challenges the ref’s decision

  • @Big_PJ
    @Big_PJ 2 роки тому +7

    Sterling's dive just enforced this

    • @hehno1
      @hehno1 2 роки тому +2

      It was clearly a penalty the danish defender almost broke his leg

    • @Big_PJ
      @Big_PJ 2 роки тому

      @@hehno1 Yet he was already ready falling before any contact

    • @ToczicA2i9
      @ToczicA2i9 2 роки тому

      @@Big_PJ no he wasn't

    • @ToczicA2i9
      @ToczicA2i9 2 роки тому

      That was never a dive

    • @Big_PJ
      @Big_PJ 2 роки тому

      @@ToczicA2i9 Yeah he was bro

  • @Niko_Bellic4
    @Niko_Bellic4 3 роки тому +2

    The problem, as many are suggesting, is not with the rules, but with VAR itself. The rules of football have long been in place and never has there been as much talk of a drastic overhall of some rules as there is now. In my opinion, there are two ways of fixing VAR. Firstly, do away with the lines used to decide whether a player is offside and let the officials call it based soley from looking at it. If there is no clear and obvious offside that can be seen simply by looking at the best camera angle, a goal should stand. Rugby has an offside rule and I have never seen lines being used by the TMO to decide whether a player was offside or not. This allows the benefit of the doubt to be given to the attacking team, as was always in place before VAR was used. Secondly, the referees and officials should be mic'd up so that everyone can hear why a decision was given. This will allow them to explain their interpretation of the rules and minimize the hysteria that seems to surround every big call. People may still disagree at times, but at least we would know why a decision was made, instead of having to guess for ourselves without any explanation.

  • @tomb7901
    @tomb7901 2 роки тому +2

    It's the offside rule that ruins football.

  • @kruqtion9615
    @kruqtion9615 3 роки тому +6

    Today’s Milan vs Lazio game (23/12/20) demonstrated the flaws of VAR perfectly. A very, very light skim on the back of the attackers boots while his eyes were up, and a penalty was given. Actually couldn’t believe my eyes

  • @magnifician21
    @magnifician21 2 роки тому +3

    I think VAR should only be used for checking the possibility of a disallowed goal (like lampard goal vs Germany) or the foul happened in the box to decide a penalty kick.
    Anything outside that should depend on the referee's decision only

  • @josephgoogles1927
    @josephgoogles1927 2 роки тому +1

    When you give a pilot autopilot he's eventually gonna forget how to fly.

  • @GermanicusCaesar117
    @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

    I need this video after seeing a great goal from the Arab Cup disallowed because the scorer's leg hair was offside.

  • @Mark13091961
    @Mark13091961 3 роки тому +3

    In many instances the incompetence of the ref has been passed to the incompetence of the VAR official. Appalling implementation

  • @Neo_Rain146
    @Neo_Rain146 3 роки тому +3

    Keep goal like technology and get rid of the rest of the garbage

    • @namesurname2958
      @namesurname2958 3 роки тому +2

      100% the offside thing has ruined the sport for me. Cant even celebrate anymore

  • @juristankiewicz4720
    @juristankiewicz4720 3 роки тому +1

    The offside rule is rubbish. Why does it matter if 1/4 inch of your elbow(which you don't use) is offside?

  • @adhi02
    @adhi02 2 роки тому +3

    In the MLS VAR ruled a goal onside for higuain but if he were in the prem it would be offside. Sometimes MLS just gets it correct😂

    • @m4rkscott
      @m4rkscott 2 роки тому

      whatever margin is allowed then there will always be something a fraction over that margin, thats what happens with accuracy , if you allowed 10 cm then someone will be off at 11cm and people will say he should have been on because it was marginal

  • @uacari
    @uacari Рік тому +1

    for me, the most inconsistent thing is the offside line. it should get thicker, otherwise no one will be able get away from the defender. besides, many times, whether the players are offside or not, DOESNT MAKE A FUCKING DIFFERENCE AT THE PLAY

  • @steffencorcoran
    @steffencorcoran 3 роки тому

    Couldn't agree more...!!!

  • @frankie-rp4xo
    @frankie-rp4xo 3 роки тому +4

    😂would say I’m glad to be in the championship,but I really ain’t😭😂

  • @wellno7377
    @wellno7377 2 роки тому +4

    The problem is when the person behind VAR is a fan of one team and... Money

    • @drugoviic
      @drugoviic 2 роки тому +1

      Nope youre absolutely wrong

  • @viksinha5410
    @viksinha5410 2 роки тому +2

    It's like a police officer who gives you a speeding ticket for going 71 mph in a 70 mph speed limit

  • @kellentyler5158
    @kellentyler5158 3 роки тому +3

    Plot twist: VAR was made to allow for more commercial breaks.

  • @shaneemanuelle6243
    @shaneemanuelle6243 Рік тому

    Same is true for technology in cricket. It was meant to overcome the howler by an umpire. But it’s overused, takes away the character of the umpire in the game, is abused by the players and I also question whether it’s accurate as well.

  • @BossOchido
    @BossOchido 3 роки тому +2

    VAR is not the problem. The problem is the idiotic referees behind the system. It's supposed to be clear & obvious. When you to draw lines surely just give it to the attacker if the linesman didn't flag it.

  • @maxmustermann3876
    @maxmustermann3876 2 роки тому +1

    The problem is not VAR!
    The problem is the bad designed offside rule.
    If the decision based on a rule depends on a few cm this rule needs to be changed.
    One could prevent hanging attackers waiting at the goal differently.
    Before VAR goals had been denied because the attacker was 2 cm offside as well. The difference being that some goals had been denied even though the attacker was 5 cm inside. And some goals were given even though the attacker was 8 cm offside. Is that any better?!

  • @ShaquilleOatmeal849
    @ShaquilleOatmeal849 2 роки тому +2

    VAR itself isn’t a bad thing it’s how long it takes. Sports like basketball and cricket have it. But the difference between them and football id they take upwards of 10-30seconds to make a decision. When I’ve seen football decisions go to 9 minuets at one time.

    • @KitsGravity
      @KitsGravity Рік тому

      Accurate. Very occassionally have I seen decisions taking more than a minute in cricket. Very rare indeed. And they use very sophisticated technology such as audio meters, xray hotstpot, etc. VAR will evolve over time. It won't happen in a day.

  • @realdealgaming682
    @realdealgaming682 2 роки тому

    In cricket both team have 1 review they can only use once in one half and use the other in the second half. 2 reviews per match.

  • @jonc3295
    @jonc3295 3 роки тому

    Eric Peter's handball for Burnley against Arsenal not given, or Patrick Bamford offside decision with his outstretched arm. Not sure which one is the biggest VAR joke.

  • @charlontjituka940
    @charlontjituka940 2 роки тому

    You a so right

  • @tba6
    @tba6 2 роки тому +2

    Get var out and scrap it. That's what the fans want and football is their for the fans. Now take your computers go!

  • @footballmaniac4464
    @footballmaniac4464 3 роки тому +17

    But var was needed in Chelsea vs barca match

    • @robertwraith7264
      @robertwraith7264 3 роки тому +1

      Wouldn't of helped barcelona wasn't supposed to loose

    • @overximas7850
      @overximas7850 3 роки тому

      The 2 matches lol, barca got robbed too

    • @enzojanssens4894
      @enzojanssens4894 3 роки тому +1

      Think he meant the 2009 semi final

  • @sapamergenderson5769
    @sapamergenderson5769 10 днів тому

    its only down slope from the day VAR introduced... from that point fans decrease, and even when they gonna try fix ir and not use VAR, irs gonna be too late

  • @pspsvan65
    @pspsvan65 2 роки тому +1

    If you remove VAR, you must also remove all cameras around the field, otherwise we will after the matches see how there was no goal or a red card , although everyone sees that it should have been so. VAR has come to stay!

  • @itznj8983
    @itznj8983 2 роки тому +1

    I don’t think VAR is a problem, it is how the rules are, if someone’s toes is offside, they are offside but no one enjoys that, and when the player is marginally offside, there is no difference if he is marginally onside as well, so for those tight calls, just give it as onside and continue with the game

  • @lucah2373
    @lucah2373 2 роки тому

    Dude how do u only have 13k?!?

  • @nawwk79
    @nawwk79 3 роки тому +2

    Neymar is the poster-boy for playacting.

  • @Stezzanz
    @Stezzanz 3 роки тому +10

    Couldn't agree more.

  • @HarryFilson
    @HarryFilson 3 роки тому +3

    Don't quite know where he was going with the hand of god point but overall I agree 😂

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

      I think he's saying that part of Maradona's legend is that he's managed to score a goal with his hand in the World Cup and get away with it. Part of the fun in soccer/football is the ref's decisions and the controversies. Think of the 1966 England goal by Hurst: did it cross the line or did it not? Think of Thierry Henry's handball against Ireland. You get the point. Like it or not, part of the fun is the drama. While I am glad that teams can no longer can screwed over because of these things anymore (at least theoretically), a part of me misses this kind of drama and controversy.

  • @tother1069
    @tother1069 3 роки тому +7

    Man , deception is part of the game. If you can trick reff into calling a penalty for you , great.
    Human error does happen, but that's part of the game. Don't take it away!!

    • @deadtrooper4586
      @deadtrooper4586 3 роки тому

      @Imperialist Caesar the only thing I like is: Neymars diving, trash talk and banter and idk remember what I was going to say

  • @FoxholeFightClub
    @FoxholeFightClub 3 роки тому

    good video.

  • @gsimon6168
    @gsimon6168 2 роки тому

    VAR has come to end the unfair traits of Big Name teams winning by illegitimate goals, that happens a lot in World Cup matches. I enjoy watching "underdogs" beating the "Big Names" in Football. The Problem is the Weird Laws like being offside by an Elbow.

  • @ronanfurey5906
    @ronanfurey5906 3 роки тому +1

    It’s not just football either var has spoiled every sport

  • @AhmedAli-oj5gq
    @AhmedAli-oj5gq 2 роки тому +2

    I agree with this whole video

  • @abdelrahman.footy.7143
    @abdelrahman.footy.7143 2 роки тому

    var should only count if their feet are over the defender line

  • @benjamincooney5617
    @benjamincooney5617 3 роки тому +2

    Var is getting better in 2021

  • @Scientist19exe
    @Scientist19exe 3 роки тому

    Offside tech is coming soon.
    Next, Var needs to improve on penalty check. When they check penalty after 5 mins of non stop play it feels disjointed. Imagine opponent scores a goal and penalty check disallows it.
    Maybe stop the play for penalty check.
    Or VAR refs grow some balls and say whether its penalty or not quickly instead of referring it to Ground ref.
    And show the players what the VAR is checking instead of having them stand around in confusion.

  • @pikachu8508
    @pikachu8508 Рік тому

    VAR is definitely ruining football. It not only slow down the game, but also make football boring to watch because of those prolonged stoppage. Also referees made far more errors with VAR. Not to mention that I'm a hardcore traditionalist and hate any kind of changes and technologies being used in football and any other sports.

  • @Alexandroid187
    @Alexandroid187 2 роки тому

    People who are saying VAR is bad don't remember matches like Barca Vs Chelsea 2009, Barcelona Vs arsenal 2011, Henry Vs Ireland and so on.
    There is a clear offside rule and if a player is offside there is nothing you can do about it.

  • @nima833
    @nima833 3 роки тому

    Im not againt using VAR.
    But the way it used is definitely ridiculous.
    It need a huge rework on operating to make it usefull instead of the harmful shit that we see every week.

  • @mayditg2122
    @mayditg2122 2 роки тому +1

    Manè’s elbow is better than the best of the best

  • @rixe11
    @rixe11 2 роки тому

    They must improve the use of VAR but form me now in an essetial tool.

  • @sorrynationst3685
    @sorrynationst3685 3 роки тому +6

    Blame Skysports for this. Analysis to paralysis every week in search of controversy.

    • @namesurname2958
      @namesurname2958 3 роки тому +1

      Today's world: WE MUST HAVE PERFECTION, WE MUST HAVE PERFECTION, WE MUST HAVE PERFECTION, IMPERFECTION IS ILLEGAL

    • @sorrynationst3685
      @sorrynationst3685 3 роки тому +1

      @@namesurname2958 definitely, and as result, the world has moved further away from perfect than ever before

  • @peterduggan3150
    @peterduggan3150 3 роки тому

    And with regards to time wasting that's an easy problem to solve just give the referees a phone or some kind of portable screen to put in their pocket so they can just pull it out instead of having to run over to that stupid monitor

  • @jamarwente1497
    @jamarwente1497 3 роки тому +1

    🤝🏾💯💯💯💯💯💯agreed

  • @RobbieNero
    @RobbieNero 3 роки тому +1

    VAR should be only used once per game for each team when they decide to use it

  • @timoclutch6519
    @timoclutch6519 3 роки тому

    VAR was introduced because many fans thought that they were hard done by decisions , it is sth we have to live with although some decisions are ridiculous , I don't see how it is scrapped off considering the amount of capital that has been put into it . I also hate VAR

    • @MohamedAli-xu3uw
      @MohamedAli-xu3uw 3 роки тому

      It can with people power. Loss of fans will cause it to change.

  • @jdjsjshjsjsjsjjd1050
    @jdjsjshjsjsjsjjd1050 2 роки тому +1

    This video helped me pass my English language speech

  • @DudeFromSpace-vf9ut
    @DudeFromSpace-vf9ut 2 роки тому +1

    i miss the old days...
    WHEN SALAH'S PINKIE TOE WASNT OFFSIDE

    • @GermanicusCaesar117
      @GermanicusCaesar117 2 роки тому

      You should see the FIFA Arab Cup game between UAE and Mauritania where an Emirati player managed to score a great bicycle kick goal but it was disallowed by VAR because his knees were offside.

  • @crazyteddypubgyt617
    @crazyteddypubgyt617 2 роки тому

    Nose is offside lol 🤣🤣🤣

  • @aslamaslu4593
    @aslamaslu4593 2 роки тому

    Watch England vs Germany world Cup match where lampard scores and not allowed. How did you see that

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 2 роки тому

    Couldn’t we just use VAR for dives, but only for when penalties are called. Not for reviewing something that didn’t get a call.

  • @kartikkalia01
    @kartikkalia01 3 роки тому +1

    Remember Chelsea - barca 2009?

    • @ti3er094
      @ti3er094 3 роки тому

      Aaaaaaaaa shut up

  • @letsallgetalong5499
    @letsallgetalong5499 2 роки тому

    The off side rule should be slightly changed it should be measured by the feet, not any part of the body!

  • @abh20_55
    @abh20_55 3 роки тому

    AND IT HAPPENED AGAIN LAST SECOND AGO🤬🤬🤬

  • @newguy6491
    @newguy6491 2 роки тому

    It needs to evolve for the fast pase momentum.
    We cannot just dish it ...its done some good especially for the underdogs which referees dont favour throu cognitive bias .

  • @enosmutowelasiwakwi1859
    @enosmutowelasiwakwi1859 2 роки тому +1

    The human element which is an important ingredient in football is slowly being removed; this element makes fans pay and enjoy the game but hard lucky this is on its way out of football. It MUST be checked! The assistant referees who are specialists in judging offside are slowly becoming obsolete and unnecessary. There will be no soup left in the game of football to deserve its rightful position in the world of entertainment. In my view, football betting may have a hand in this!

  • @nord2397
    @nord2397 Рік тому

    Football isn’t supposed to be fair and the charm is that a team could win on a mistake from the ref.
    I miss the older days of football when controversial situations from the refs and players would have to be seen at the moment and if the ref didn’t see what happened the game would go on, just like life goes on. I started to boycott football many years ago and I was crazy for football, but this tech have destroyed the game I once loved.

  • @Christian_Bagger
    @Christian_Bagger 2 роки тому

    I think there’s a world where VAR would benefit and make everything more accurate and smooth, but it’s like we’ve gotten all the worse aspects of it. In its initiation the game became a whole lot more stale. I also do believe that’s the competency of refs are as much as part of the game as everything else, I actually think refs are using it as a cushion and their overall performance has become way worse. There’s VAR every single goal seemingly in knocks the air out. In the past you a pen had to be more severe than a foul, and that was a common courtesy and etiquette rather than rule. That’s completely gone now, sometimes it’s even a really weak foul.
    Tennis is an example on how to use technology right. This was what I feared! And it had gotten slightly better since the Euro, so now it’s at least tolerable to look at, but that’s far, far under par to standards let alone improvements.

  • @MinhNguyen-bd4jx
    @MinhNguyen-bd4jx 2 роки тому +1

    VAR is easier to fix a match's result.

  • @NotAbdurplays
    @NotAbdurplays 3 роки тому

    DID YOU SEE VAN DIJK INJURY THE GOALIE SHOULD HAVE GOT RED CARD BUT IT WAS OFFSIDE

  • @sudipadhikari895
    @sudipadhikari895 2 роки тому +1

    After VAR was introduced Arsenal finished 8th twice in a row...Arsenal players are the ones to get highest numbers of red cards in the premier league because of lame decisions of Video Assistant Refrees. Whereas Manchester United progressed because they are the ones who largely benefited from VAR. Brundo Farnandez made his name in the premier league bacause of VAR.

    • @wasabijones4571
      @wasabijones4571 2 роки тому

      no one wants to talk about this. Man U fans think its a conspiracy

  • @riropower
    @riropower Рік тому +1

    Yes VAR is ruining football.
    VAR is ruining football because it takes the spirit, atmosphere and emotion out of football. Referees rely more and more on VAR and don‘t have to stick up to their decisions anymore. For god‘s sake, in the Atletico vs. Leverkusen game the ref ended the game AND gave a penalty afterwards, WTF! Football lives with these types of decisions where one team might‘ve been luckier than the other. If the refs feel like they‘re not capable of making these decisions, then what are they doing in top tier football? I‘d rather have two linesmen each side and two assistants constantly surveilling the penalty box and give an immediate signal if there was a foul. Not this 5 minute, monitorwatching cr@p. If a player is offside by an micro-distance, they go and watch TV for 5 minutes. The ref should just make his decision, onside or offside and then stick with it. In the end, behind the VAR is also just a human that makes faulty decisions, so why even bother having it?
    VAR should only be used in situations where there should‘ve been a clear red card, or, where a red card was given that should not have been given. This is my opinion.

  • @splash8429
    @splash8429 2 роки тому

    so it's not technology's fault. It's still the people who analyzes it. They just need to be consistent

  • @mokakola7777
    @mokakola7777 3 роки тому +3

    Fast forward to today where they allowed a goal at first from Mexico vs USA, going to VAR, they found the Mexico player obviously offside, and not just by an armpit or toenail. USA go on to win 3-2.

  • @chikon1409
    @chikon1409 3 роки тому

    Rip football 😔 var..no fans, all the money..

  • @jjackomin
    @jjackomin 2 роки тому

    It's a good idea, but not the way it's being used now.

  • @sojiroseta98
    @sojiroseta98 Рік тому

    Yeah but i never want to see the 'hand of god' happen again in a world cup so to me thats more important than the headaches of the wait time.

  • @megathrash8539
    @megathrash8539 3 роки тому +15

    Finally someone talking sense!!!

  • @Veit_itj-jeg
    @Veit_itj-jeg 3 роки тому

    Norway have no VAR

  • @Jerichau360
    @Jerichau360 2 роки тому

    It takes a minute at most.

  • @James-hh1lq
    @James-hh1lq 3 роки тому +3

    Not just var it's how soft the game has become anyone for.netball ladies ??

  • @papercurrencyisascam3015
    @papercurrencyisascam3015 2 роки тому

    Limit the request of VAR usage per team. When there was no VAR, most are whining about it, now those who are not happy with VAR just shut the %@^& off!

  • @pilothaha
    @pilothaha 2 роки тому

    I don’t think VAR is annoying waiting 5 minutes is normal and knowing the right decision is made is definitely good.

  • @user-hj2nk6nj6w
    @user-hj2nk6nj6w 2 роки тому

    I lost my 600 $ bet because of 1cm offside, you own me money VAR !

  • @ActiveArron
    @ActiveArron Рік тому

    Go back 3 seasons and show every blatant incorrect decision every single week .. if possible try and tally up which official/referees have made the decisions. Massive public pressure needs to be put on this corruption

  • @MyBeAtRsRyrHeAtErs
    @MyBeAtRsRyrHeAtErs Рік тому

    What is the biggest league in the world without VAR?!