using the off-arm to block Imboden's attack. I don't think it was intentional, but I do see it. Looks like both refs saw it on video too. Not to mention, in my opinion, Le Pechoux got away with corps-a-corps to avoid a touch more than once...
@@matthiasjamison-koenig9560 IMBODEN provoke many corps à corps to avoir a touch and remise. as LE PECHOUX use his off-arm (on sticking it on body) and that can substitute too. And IMBODEN like steps forward, to be attacked then try to touch (then referee like to give IMBODEN an attack (sometime without any point of attack (t.9 or t.83))... and other guy a counter-attack (even with all point of attack (t.9 or t.83) before any offensive move or IMBODEN) I suppose that's new way of fence... ("New interpretation" of rules say guys. That's not interpretation and just refering for beginner (You turn, u got priority, then my turn...). But if FIE say that's ok ? No, they don't say anything about it...) Pro tips : Priority need to be win. And many of time, nobody have priority (mostly if someone just beat a blade, or if go forward, or if, point threatening the moon, obviously if bent arm...) And that's u need for get priority : attack, and if the other guy already attack, u can parry for ripost with priority (dont lost too much fencing time to ripost after parry.), and u can be "point in line" u can try avoid, but don't get priority. U dont lost it to try avoid too Beat the blade don't give any priority... Attack give it. But u can attack by beats the blade. (that's suppose attack begin t.9) for NOT LOST the priority of ATTACK, you have to follow rules t.85 Beat the blade (call Deflect the opponent's blade) can break a priority of "point in line" (t.84 1) (= NO more priority for opponent), so u can attack just after deflected blade (and take priority on attacking) And if u want to know order to judge the correctness of an attack, you can read the t.83 2 on d) you got : Actions, simple or compound, steps or feints which are executed with a bent arm, are not considered as attacks but as preparations, laying themselves open to the initiation of the offensive or defensive/offensive action of the opponent. Don't interpret it. Just read it. There is not many interpretation. On a) you got : The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.10), is correctly executed when the straightening of the arm, the point threatening the valid target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche. Threatening is interpretable... But we are at thrusting weapon, so be clever... Strainghtening of the arm is interpretable... But if a fencer put his elbow back, just interpret the strainghtening from an fencing position : "en garde" And precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche... just do it. (u can make baby lunge, or beginning of flèche, but it's final movement to break distance)
Just watch or in 0.25 slow motion ... at this point there's no arm in front of the electric surface... wé clearely see the shoulders coming but he doesnt cover anything ... And the most annoying in here je when u watch it slowely u can see that its way after the tuch... what does the video work for then ??
Nobody care on : 0:42 : "attack, no" If someone see one. Pls screen it. I see right dont care about distance, left attack (with a little fléche) then right, dunno, trying to get a light for the point ? Ridiculous 2:38 : Only one make a correct attack. t.83 2 In order to judge the correctness of an attack the following points must be considered: a) The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.10), is correctly executed when the straightening of the arm, the point threatening the valid target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche. U see right try to beat the blade. But left don't attack ! And he move bent arm, but not on the research of blade (on this fencing time. This preparation of right done give any priority to left.) 4:12 ... no comment 5:16 Preparation of right, attack of left. (Right never do more than touch without threatening, without straightening of the arm (and can't see lunge or the flèche). Left have all the point of definition (and touch first, no use for referee here, but interesting to say...) 6:16 ... another interesting moment 6:42 same than 5:16. But, Right straightening of the arm AFTER being touch. Referee say : "attack no" (I love the reaction of LE PECHOUX at 6:44) 8:45 ... another one. 9:27 ... little bit different... But still right fault... He search contact, got it, then touch. (And people talk about got out or not, halt or not) If this move is legal, why not legalise the use of other arm. (an finish the touch without weapon ?) 20:10 Left attack on preparation of right. Then he try avoid (on parry and dodge). Just make the good call, LEFT get priority, end of the story... Same on : 21:55 : Time to attack, touch, then parry... But im agree, LEFT : LE PECHOUX sticks his arm to his body, that substitute valid target, and is usefull for "parry" with body and the demand on 22:53 is just amazing (the man who substitute call video for that reason) But for IMBODEN => At all three weapons, it is forbidden for a fencer to cause corps à corps intentionally to avoid being hit, or to jostle his opponent.
I've never seen so much animosity between the two fencers and coaches during a bout before
My favorite bout of all time!
What was the red card at 20:11 for? I don't see it.
using the off-arm to block Imboden's attack. I don't think it was intentional, but I do see it. Looks like both refs saw it on video too. Not to mention, in my opinion, Le Pechoux got away with corps-a-corps to avoid a touch more than once...
@@matthiasjamison-koenig9560
IMBODEN provoke many corps à corps to avoir a touch and remise.
as LE PECHOUX use his off-arm (on sticking it on body) and that can substitute too.
And IMBODEN like steps forward, to be attacked then try to touch (then referee like to give IMBODEN an attack (sometime without any point of attack (t.9 or t.83))... and other guy a counter-attack (even with all point of attack (t.9 or t.83) before any offensive move or IMBODEN)
I suppose that's new way of fence... ("New interpretation" of rules say guys. That's not interpretation and just refering for beginner (You turn, u got priority, then my turn...). But if FIE say that's ok ? No, they don't say anything about it...)
Pro tips : Priority need to be win. And many of time, nobody have priority (mostly if someone just beat a blade, or if go forward, or if, point threatening the moon, obviously if bent arm...)
And that's u need for get priority : attack, and if the other guy already attack, u can parry for ripost with priority (dont lost too much fencing time to ripost after parry.), and u can be "point in line"
u can try avoid, but don't get priority. U dont lost it to try avoid too
Beat the blade don't give any priority... Attack give it. But u can attack by beats the blade. (that's suppose attack begin t.9) for NOT LOST the priority of ATTACK, you have to follow rules t.85
Beat the blade (call Deflect the opponent's blade) can break a priority of "point in line" (t.84 1) (= NO more priority for opponent), so u can attack just after deflected blade (and take priority on attacking)
And if u want to know order to judge the correctness of an attack, you can read the t.83 2
on d) you got : Actions, simple or compound, steps or feints which are executed with a bent arm, are not considered as attacks but as preparations, laying themselves open to the initiation of the offensive or defensive/offensive action of the opponent.
Don't interpret it. Just read it. There is not many interpretation.
On a) you got : The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.10), is correctly executed when the straightening of the arm, the point threatening the valid target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche.
Threatening is interpretable... But we are at thrusting weapon, so be clever...
Strainghtening of the arm is interpretable... But if a fencer put his elbow back, just interpret the strainghtening from an fencing position : "en garde"
And precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche... just do it. (u can make baby lunge, or beginning of flèche, but it's final movement to break distance)
Just watch or in 0.25 slow motion ... at this point there's no arm in front of the electric surface... wé clearely see the shoulders coming but he doesnt cover anything ...
And the most annoying in here je when u watch it slowely u can see that its way after the tuch... what does the video work for then ??
Lepechoux should have been carded a bunch more times for forcing corps a corps to avoid getting hit
Damnnnnnn spicy
16:49 pas tres poli ca
Imboden is a children!!!
Pretty Much!!!
everything was okay until the last aggression from race in the very end
Nobody care on :
0:42 : "attack, no" If someone see one. Pls screen it. I see right dont care about distance, left attack (with a little fléche) then right, dunno, trying to get a light for the point ? Ridiculous
2:38 : Only one make a correct attack.
t.83 2 In order to judge the correctness of an attack the following points must be considered:
a) The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.10), is correctly executed when the straightening of the
arm, the point threatening the valid target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the flèche.
U see right try to beat the blade. But left don't attack ! And he move bent arm, but not on the research of blade (on this fencing time. This preparation of right done give any priority to left.)
4:12 ... no comment
5:16 Preparation of right, attack of left. (Right never do more than touch without threatening, without straightening of the arm (and can't see lunge or the flèche).
Left have all the point of definition (and touch first, no use for referee here, but interesting to say...)
6:16 ... another interesting moment
6:42 same than 5:16. But, Right straightening of the arm AFTER being touch. Referee say : "attack no" (I love the reaction of LE PECHOUX at 6:44)
8:45 ... another one.
9:27 ... little bit different... But still right fault... He search contact, got it, then touch. (And people talk about got out or not, halt or not)
If this move is legal, why not legalise the use of other arm. (an finish the touch without weapon ?)
20:10 Left attack on preparation of right. Then he try avoid (on parry and dodge). Just make the good call, LEFT get priority, end of the story...
Same on : 21:55 : Time to attack, touch, then parry...
But im agree, LEFT : LE PECHOUX sticks his arm to his body, that substitute valid target, and is usefull for "parry" with body and the demand on 22:53 is just amazing (the man who substitute call video for that reason)
But for IMBODEN => At all three weapons, it is forbidden for a fencer to cause corps à corps intentionally to avoid being hit, or to jostle his opponent.