3.4.6-Linear Algebra: Gauss-Seidel and Jacobi

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @devsutreja5053
    @devsutreja5053 4 роки тому +26

    Are we ignoring the fact that his name is "jacobi-shop" 😂

  • @MathTutorVideos
    @MathTutorVideos 10 років тому +9

    Great video and great explanation Jacob. Thanks from a non-affiliated university student that surfed across your video by random luck.

    • @kvyi
      @kvyi  10 років тому +6

      Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you found it useful. Good luck.

    • @MathTutorVideos
      @MathTutorVideos 10 років тому +1

      Jacob Bishop Thanks again for taking the time to make it and good luck to you as well. I'll definitely be viewing some other videos over the new few days pre-midterm on Friday :)

  • @johnsinclair1447
    @johnsinclair1447 5 років тому +1

    Nice. All 46 linear algebra videos completed in one day -- another great review / refresher. I took LA about 30 years ago, so not completely new to me. Thanks Jacob. Off to Part 5.....

  • @dramoyoedward9229
    @dramoyoedward9229 Рік тому

    Very wonderful explanation of two ideas summarised at once... thanks!!

  • @tim8602
    @tim8602 9 років тому +5

    Thanks for taking the time to make and put out these videos!
    I've been following along, but what happened to playlist 4?

  • @PaleyDaley
    @PaleyDaley 3 роки тому

    You say Gauss-Seidel converges faster, but what about stability? Does it mean the Jacobi iteration is more stable, or do they have the same stability?

  • @shobhankarthick1464
    @shobhankarthick1464 3 роки тому

    Hey Bishop,
    Where can I find the playlist of the next part i.e. part 4. Please let me know, it will be of great help.

  • @nutty-san4255
    @nutty-san4255 4 роки тому

    Hello, can I ask... given the same initial iterate, if the Jacobi method converges, will the Gauss-Seidel method also converge? And is it vice-versa?

  • @mohammadshabaz482
    @mohammadshabaz482 8 років тому +1

    thanks got the difference between the two easily with the help of your video

  • @AJ-et3vf
    @AJ-et3vf 3 роки тому

    Awesome video man

  • @MFMBarcelona
    @MFMBarcelona 10 років тому +1

    Thank you! But how can I find successive substitution ?

  • @deborahfranza2925
    @deborahfranza2925 4 роки тому

    This is awesome, thank you for posting

  • @akey_9655
    @akey_9655 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @deborahfranza2925
    @deborahfranza2925 4 роки тому

    hmm but what was epsilon sub s?

  • @hari8568
    @hari8568 7 років тому

    Jacob why is the method not accurate? Aren't you just rearranging equations? Also why is it essential that we can use this method only for diagonally dominant elements?

  • @Elitecataphract
    @Elitecataphract 10 років тому

    Very good explanation, thank you.

  • @classicsound90
    @classicsound90 9 років тому

    good job. good explenation. thank you.

  • @hanyong10616
    @hanyong10616 8 років тому

    good explanation .... thanks alot

  • @vasilegherta8570
    @vasilegherta8570 4 роки тому

    Hei guys, how i can find epsilon s?

    • @kvyi
      @kvyi  4 роки тому

      It is chosen or defined to serve as the stopping criteria. Smaller epsilon s will run longer and hopefully be more accurate.

  • @djahidganoun1586
    @djahidganoun1586 8 років тому

    thannnk youuu mann

  • @henosamhenosam6292
    @henosamhenosam6292 9 років тому

    10x

  • @laserfrendez141
    @laserfrendez141 9 років тому

    hey M alazme first of all u need to clear the the concept over here and watch it again

  • @rajamahendrareddyrajareddy5190
    @rajamahendrareddyrajareddy5190 8 років тому

    supply xam

  • @Kidsvideo-offialkidsvideochann
    @Kidsvideo-offialkidsvideochann 5 років тому

    hi . hope we could be friends?