Explaining Wi-Fi: 802.11 Standards & Generations

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 чер 2024
  • Explanation of Wi-Fi IEEE standards and generations. You can learn more about Wi-Fi on the Wi-Fi Alliance website at: www.wi-fi.org/
    The Cisco white paper I cite is available at:
    www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/pro...
    For additional ExplainingComputers videos and other content, you can become a channel member here:
    / @explainingcomputers
    More videos on computing and related topics can be found at:
    / @explainingcomputers
    You may also like my ExplainingTheFuture channel at: / @explainingthefuture
    Chapters:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:34 Wi-Fi Origins
    03:48 Real World Performance
    07:25 Generational Wi-Fi
    09:57 Other Wi-Fi Standards
    #Wi-Fi #explainingcomputers
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 499

  • @MarkTheMorose
    @MarkTheMorose Рік тому +205

    The Wi-fi Alliance has done a better / less confusing job than their USB equivalent organisation in giving the various implementations simple names. That said, I treasure my new CAT 6 LAN cables.

    • @Uniblab8
      @Uniblab8 Рік тому +5

      I have some CAT 7 cable but have never hooked it up. Does it really make that much of a difference? I have 5 PCs on my network all connected via CAT 5 cables (old fashioned? LOL).

    • @John.0z
      @John.0z Рік тому +9

      @@Uniblab8 What are you connecting? If the slowest NIC is say 1Gbps, then there will be no difference using cables designed to work at higher phase switching frequencies.
      On the other hand, if you use say CAT 4 cables with a pair of 5Gbps NICs or a NIC and switch, then the cable will usually be the speed limiting element.
      You might find it interesting to get a dump of the line errors. If you are getting no errors, then you have no problems.

    • @caturdaynite7217
      @caturdaynite7217 Рік тому +4

      @@Uniblab8 CAT5 is fine for what you are using it for. I usually use CAT6 for heavy traffic uses, like in an office with dozens of users. For that use I run CAT6 riser (CMR) cable. Well actually, I have an electrician do it, my back isn't up to ladder work these days.

    • @Uniblab8
      @Uniblab8 Рік тому +1

      @@John.0z Thanks

    • @Uniblab8
      @Uniblab8 Рік тому

      @@caturdaynite7217 Great. Thanks. Much appreciated

  • @RoboNuggie
    @RoboNuggie Рік тому +69

    I'm blown away by this explanation Chris, in all my years online I never knew the origins, the differences (only superficially aware of the differences) between the standards and why they suddenly changed naming conventions.
    Thank you for this... you sir are a great teacher.

    • @sbrazenor2
      @sbrazenor2 Рік тому +5

      Now if only we could get FreeBSD to support all of the current hardware for Wi-Fi... 🤣 As a matter of fact, I was using a new USB3 dongle for Wi-Fi 6E on Linux and I had to swap the kernel because it was added in version 6.3.4 about three or so weeks ago, but the version I had in PopOS was 6.2.16 and it didn't even acknowledge the device as anything useful. Drivers can be a pain on any OS.
      I still keep meaning to get more serious about using BSD based systems, but I just never stick to them. The same went for Linux, so eventually I'll get there. (I started using Linux in the 1990's, but didn't 'daily drive' a version of Linux until 2017 or so.)

    • @RoboNuggie
      @RoboNuggie Рік тому +3

      @@sbrazenor2 I was shocked that 802.11ac came out so long ago, and FreeBSD is no where ready yet to get that as standard....I wish they would hurry up (work is being done, but it's a slow pace).
      Bluetooth and Wifi - the bane of FreeBSD..... 😞

    • @John.0z
      @John.0z Рік тому +1

      @@RoboNuggie I will dare to suggest that the actual supporting chips for 802.11ac were available some time after the specification was announced. Then the Linux diver authors get left out in the cold by some manufacturers, which adds to the delay. BSD is in much the same situation, but has more rigorous driver testing.
      That is usually the way, although the specs are written in consultation or collaboration with many of the chip makers, so there are exceptions.

    • @sbrazenor2
      @sbrazenor2 Рік тому

      @@RoboNuggie I wonder if there's a way to find the drivers from Linux and somehow make them work for BSD. 🤔
      In a quick search I did find that there's the utility ndisgen, which should be able to convert a Windows driver to a FreeBSD driver. It might be interesting to try and see what happens. It could be that you've had a solution all along, but because it's not well known (seems documented pretty well) - it's just been under the radar.

    • @ChrisB_Crisps
      @ChrisB_Crisps 3 місяці тому

      @RoboNuggie that it maybe because one never had the *intellectual curiosity* to get those years online mentioned and learn about it or maybe because there was no time for that in those years online

  • @maartentoors
    @maartentoors Рік тому +10

    "Miracast" is still one of the coolest WiFi iterations ever.
    Thank you Christopher!

  • @5argetech56
    @5argetech56 Рік тому +19

    I love how you made the explanation of WiFi standards and security, "Crystal Clear"! I was absorbed during the entire video. Extremely well thought out and presented. Thank you Chris. 😊

  • @gwgux
    @gwgux Рік тому +10

    This is the best video I've seen in describing the WiFi standards! Thanks for posting! As a network engineer, I love seeing stuff like this getting posted so I can direct people to it that are eager to learn!

  • @prscrystalized3706
    @prscrystalized3706 Рік тому +18

    I enjoy these. Puts a lot of figures and stats into greatly needed context.

  • @tramcrazy
    @tramcrazy Рік тому +16

    That 'train' analogy was really excellent! It really helped explain to me the differences between PHY and throughput 🙂

    • @loginregional
      @loginregional Рік тому +1

      Also consider the ONE LUMP problem and loading/unloading time. The music goes round and round... and it stutters when it comes out.

  • @James_Knott
    @James_Knott Рік тому +4

    Some notes, the channel numbers we have on 2.4 GHz originated with the original 802.11 from 1997.
    802.11g is exactly the same protocol as 802.11a, but with the addition of 802.11b protection. It is this b protection that really kills performance, when b signals are present.
    WiFi Direct used to be called Ad Hoc, where two or more devices could connect directly.

  • @tomschmidt381
    @tomschmidt381 Рік тому +8

    Great overview of 802.11/WiFi. Like mass storage the improvement in performance of both has been amazing over the last couple of decades. As someone who's engineering career spanned both the evolution of Ethernet and WiFi I am in awe

  • @RolandScheidel
    @RolandScheidel Рік тому +12

    I am an IT Consultant, a former software developer and I have to admit that I did not know even half of this.
    Thanks for educating me 🤗

  • @brianwood5220
    @brianwood5220 Рік тому +7

    Once again, Chris, an excellent video Explaining a subject that literally goes over our heads. We take it for granted these days, but when I was growing up in the 70s there wasn't even such a thing as a personal computer. Well, not in my house anyway. Always look forward to the Sunday videos. Thanks for putting in the effort. Have a great week.

  • @gagan.dee.p
    @gagan.dee.p Рік тому +2

    It's always a pleasure to see an Explaining Computers video in the feed every Sunday.

  • @Argedis
    @Argedis Рік тому +9

    One of the earliest examples of 'Wifi Direct' that I can remember is the Playstation Portable which released in 2005.
    It allowed you to directly connect to another PSP with Wifi to share games and play multiplayer. I thought it was amazing

  • @aaronperl
    @aaronperl Рік тому +14

    I remember 802.11a and b being around at the same time, and I never understood (until this video) why 802.11a wasn't more popular despite being so much faster.

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  Рік тому +10

      I also remember it being very confusing a the time: why did we all go straight to b? :)

    • @gustavrsh
      @gustavrsh Рік тому +7

      5 GHz range isn't good, especially if you have brick walls. I still use 2.4 even if 5 GHz is 4x faster for this reason.

    • @CommodoreFan64
      @CommodoreFan64 Рік тому +2

      @@gustavrsh Plus some relatively new stuff still does not support the 5GHz bandwidth which is why on my TP-Link mesh setup I had to keep my guest network at 2.4GHz to be able to connect the smart light socket on my carport, and the smart smoke alarm in my house that will alert me if I'm away from home, as they refuse to connect to the mixed 2.4/5GHz main mesh network.

    • @richardsorge-
      @richardsorge- Рік тому

      @@CommodoreFan64 good to know You have a smart smoke alarm.... he he

    • @Hugh_I
      @Hugh_I Рік тому +3

      I think it came down to two factors. The range of 802.11a on the 5Ghz band was noticeably smaller, especially with walls in between. And if I remember correctly, regulation of the 5GHz band was much more all over the place from country to country than the 2.4 Ghz band, making it much easier to just sell 2.4Ghz products world wide.
      It is still today much harder to get a 5 Ghz access point up and running when you try to DIY it with some random Wifi adapter rather than buying a ready made AP, because your wifi adapter may come with the wrong regulatory domain set (often just the international one with the lowest common denominator of what is allowed on what freq/channel), and just refuses to do AP things on the 5Ghz band.

  • @offspringfan89
    @offspringfan89 Рік тому +2

    I swear Chris is the only one who can make me understand confusing technology standards like USB, SD cards, Wi-Fi, PCIe etc. Not only his didatics is fantastic, but so is the material that he uses to explain the topics, like tables, graphs and lists.

  • @technoWZ5598
    @technoWZ5598 Рік тому +28

    I literally had no idea about how wifi worked, that is, until I found this video!
    Keep up the great work Chris, your channel is amazing, and it truly deserves a lot of attention.
    I'm excited to see what will be coming out next Monday. (I said Monday because your videos come out very late in Australia, usually between 11PM and 2AM.)

    • @Uniblab8
      @Uniblab8 Рік тому +1

      Chris is the best.

    • @technoWZ5598
      @technoWZ5598 Рік тому

      @@flightforensics4523 Mate, there's no need to be like that. PLEASE keep your comments respectful. You know what they say: if you don't have anything nice to say, then keep your mouth shut 🤐

    • @technoWZ5598
      @technoWZ5598 Рік тому

      @@Uniblab8 He sure is!

  • @TheClembo
    @TheClembo Рік тому +3

    Thank you for your very comprehensive explanation for the wonders of Wi-Fi. It reminds me of that well known darts program back in the day where they said 'Lets look at what you could have won!' I for one will stick with Cat cabling where possible. At lease I know what to expect and what is achievable. Thanks again. ATB.

  • @watertrooper
    @watertrooper Рік тому +1

    Such a short and well put together video on Wi-Fi. Thanks!

  • @furzkram
    @furzkram Рік тому +2

    That was an EXCELLENT presentation shedding some light on the confusing cryptic terms used.
    Thanks a million for this!

  • @richardpalmanteer9798
    @richardpalmanteer9798 Рік тому +1

    Thanks, Chris for the information on the evolution of WiFi and the standards in which they are used. I look forward to the next video next Sunday, so have a good week. Thanks for all your hard work and research involved in producing these videos.

  • @marpintado
    @marpintado Рік тому +2

    Thank you Professor! Simple, precise, concise and condensed knowledge in one go!

  • @maskedlimbo
    @maskedlimbo Рік тому +3

    Your video couldn't have come at a better time. I was actually just doing my own research on how modems, and routers actually work. And wifi standards were going to be the next topic I look into. Funny timing - Thanks for your hard work. Always appreciate the information you present

  • @michaelronan4928
    @michaelronan4928 Рік тому +1

    Another excellent video bringing clarity to a complex subject. Many thanks!

  • @ardithconley2628
    @ardithconley2628 Рік тому +2

    Thanks Chris. I was around for all of this. It was so nice to hear this explained in such a clear and straight forward way. A video I can share.

  • @srvuk
    @srvuk Рік тому +1

    An excellent breakdown that will demystify some aspects for many who are not interested in intricacies.

  • @chillydoog
    @chillydoog Рік тому +3

    This is my dude right here. I love you

  • @dancan4949
    @dancan4949 Рік тому +2

    What is interesting in terms of throughput in wifi is whether there will be any full-duplex communication. As of yet, all of the 802.11 protocols have been based on half-duplex, which only allows one-way communication. Ethernet has for a long time been able to use full-duplex, making simultaneous transmission and reception between devices possible. Wireless communication is much more complicated as it introduces interference and signal attenuation, making it necessary to have good multiple access protocols and error detection at the link layer. I hope to see more breakthroughs as this technology has not yet reached its full potential.

  • @Sunlight91
    @Sunlight91 Рік тому +6

    WiFi was the first technology to bring the Internet to you. Previously the Internet only existed at one cable connected computer in your home or in your office. With a WiFi Laptop and early phones you had Internet access in your whole home, at cafes, train stations, airports, etc... Sometimes it is still the only Internet option if you go to a foreign country and your simcard doesn't work.

    • @Hugh_I
      @Hugh_I Рік тому +1

      I know what you mean, but strictly speaking in the late 90s or so my family did have internet connection to multiple computers without Wifi. With a DIY linux NAT router on the modem and good old Ethernet (of course all PCs connected together with a single bus over a coaxial cable, so everything went down when one connection failed). I even had a laptop with a PCMCIA ethernet card to plug into that.
      On the other hand my phone didn't have anything internet. In fact when there was internet, there was no phone - as the single phone line was blocked by the dialup modem. Of course the phone couldn't have done anything with it anyways, it had neither a display nor any kind of processor that could even remotely think about running something like a browser, or even just telnet.

  • @timanderson5723
    @timanderson5723 Рік тому

    Your choice of presenting colorful items on a white background is awesome.

  • @stevejennings3960
    @stevejennings3960 Рік тому +1

    Love a Sunday with the legend that is Mr Chris.. perfect video as always you legend!

  • @martifingers
    @martifingers Рік тому +1

    The usual excellent clarity brought to a complex technology.

  • @wamy7619
    @wamy7619 Рік тому +1

    As usual another excellent video covering the things we often take for granted.
    The explanations were excellent and your format perfect.

  • @pg5142
    @pg5142 Рік тому +1

    Mighty fine explanation Chris.
    Wi-fi is so ubiquitous that we forget how it has transformed our connectivity.
    And now I know what Wi-fi 6 et al means. 🙂

  • @dcc1165
    @dcc1165 11 місяців тому +1

    YAFIV (Yet Another Fabulous and Informative Video) :). I've been in the WiFi game since it game out (with those ugly antennae you'd have to connect to the back of the laptop screen) but the content in this video has really filled in the blanks as to "what came when and how did it all evolve". Keep this content coming...even though most of us who subscribe are familiar with the topics of your videos, your content makes knowledge more thorough and therefore, more valuable. Keep up the great content!!

  • @jaffarbh
    @jaffarbh Рік тому +2

    Thank you Chris. There is a lot of incorrect information out there about Wi-Fi. This video is very informative and hopefully UA-cam algorithm will understand :)

  • @ahah8797
    @ahah8797 Рік тому +1

    Thank you Chris for an excellent summary. Very helpful for my work and my home setup. Keep it up

  • @PS_Tube
    @PS_Tube Рік тому +1

    Greetings Chris.
    This is great explanatory video about Wi-Fi. This is a gem.

  • @matneu27
    @matneu27 Рік тому +2

    Thanks for another excellent explanation 👍 The view back reminded me where I equipped my first IBM ThinkPad
    (T 20)with an PCMCIA wifi card to make use of mobile Web experience. There where also WiFi Cards available to put in the CF Memory Card Slot of some devices like my Sony Zaurus organizer..

  • @AlKaBen
    @AlKaBen Рік тому +4

    Very useful indeed 👍 never knew what 802.11 meant.
    Thank you 🙏

  • @lilblackduc7312
    @lilblackduc7312 Рік тому +4

    This really cleared up my confusion over WiFi! Thank you, Professor...🇺🇸 😎👍☕

  • @chriholt
    @chriholt Рік тому

    Thank you for this Chris, I never had the different generations explained in such a clear manner.

  • @222branko
    @222branko Рік тому +1

    Thanks,
    2008 -It took me over 100 hours to understand the IEEE 802.11n

  • @Colin_Ames
    @Colin_Ames Рік тому +1

    Thanks for this clear explanation of Wi-Fi standards. Have a great week.

  • @monkeypoohonyou
    @monkeypoohonyou 11 місяців тому +1

    Top class research and explanation. Amazing work as always!

  • @NR-bt7yz
    @NR-bt7yz Рік тому +2

    Awesome job as usual Chris - thanks for putting all the work into that!

  • @davidkempton2894
    @davidkempton2894 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the video, Chris. Very enlightening!

  • @pilljr.3331
    @pilljr.3331 Рік тому +2

    Excellent video!
    Thank You Christopher!!!😊 I’ve learned a lot over the years from your videos…it’s great to know that faster “trains” are coming soon…

  • @send2gl
    @send2gl Рік тому +1

    I like your train analogy, incredible this happens at the speed of light but as you point out many factors slow it down, along with error correction.
    Factor in VPN encryption too and it is amazing how it works at all.
    We've come a long way since Telstar.

  • @atlascoo9647
    @atlascoo9647 Рік тому +9

    İ learned new thing

  • @alanthornton3530
    @alanthornton3530 Рік тому +2

    Thanks Chris for this very educational & well explained video, I didn't realise there was so much more to this, I'm amazed.

  • @ed.puckett
    @ed.puckett Рік тому +1

    Thank you for this clear summary!

  • @danielpicassomunoz2752
    @danielpicassomunoz2752 Рік тому +1

    I always assumed the specification reflected the actual max effective transfer rate transfer f my devices. Thanks for this video!

  • @imkds55
    @imkds55 Рік тому +1

    great explanation. very easy to follow, and it cleared up several questions that I have had.

  • @Maddog2090
    @Maddog2090 Рік тому +1

    I spent the entire of yesterday troubleshooting a slow Wi-Fi network… a reboot of the router improved things x4 XD hours was wasted… this video is brilliant, keep up the good work!

  • @benjaminpaffrath
    @benjaminpaffrath Рік тому +1

    Thanks a lot for this easy to understand explanation!

  • @Linux4thePeople
    @Linux4thePeople Рік тому +1

    The content, quality, and volume of the E C videos is amazing!
    Thank you E C Team!

  • @techrescuestl
    @techrescuestl 11 місяців тому +1

    veryvery helpful. Well done, Chris!

  • @LostInThe0zone
    @LostInThe0zone Рік тому +2

    Another excellent presentation. Thanks Chris.

  • @Capturing-Memories
    @Capturing-Memories Рік тому +1

    This is the video I've long been waiting for, Another great addition to the knowledge video library, I digged that USB versions one.

  • @extremelydave
    @extremelydave Рік тому +2

    Another awesome, informative video Mr Barnett. Learning what Miracast and wi-fi direct are and can do were particularly meaningful to me. Now I'm a tad more dangerous

  • @SourojitBhattacharya
    @SourojitBhattacharya Рік тому +1

    Awesome presentation, thanks a lot!

  • @andrewwalsh531
    @andrewwalsh531 Рік тому +1

    A great explanation of wifi standards & generations, thank you! It's always a source of frustration for me how little throughput my home network seems to achieve, though I have hardware capable of much higher performance. Determining for certain the bottlenecks, ie., A) my service provider, B) my broadband router, C) my wireless router, D) my client devices, or E) all of the above......I really need to sharpen my skills in this area :)

  • @jamesfearing9459
    @jamesfearing9459 Рік тому +1

    Wonderful video, very informative. Since Christmas I’ve had a WiFi 6 mesh system in our home. It’s incredible, and it’s range covers about 1/2 acre or more around the house. It’s also crazy fast. We formerly had 3 WiFi routers, names, and passwords, now just one.
    Again, excellent video.

  • @geoffhodgson2492
    @geoffhodgson2492 Рік тому +1

    Thanks Chris, an excellent refresher.

  • @philipprudhomme6967
    @philipprudhomme6967 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for this video Chris.

  • @johnsonlam
    @johnsonlam Рік тому

    Very clear and detail enough for public.

  • @Aruneh
    @Aruneh Рік тому +1

    Very informative, thank you.

  • @drumboy02
    @drumboy02 Рік тому +1

    taking my A+ certification exam this week and this was a great refresher, thanks!

    • @ExplainingComputers
      @ExplainingComputers  Рік тому +1

      Good luck in your exam.

    • @drumboy02
      @drumboy02 Рік тому +1

      ​@@ExplainingComputersThank you! Feeling pretty confident, I watch your videos every week lol

  • @t8lucas
    @t8lucas Рік тому +1

    Thank you very much Christopher, I really appreciate that a bunch ❤

  • @GroovingPict
    @GroovingPict Рік тому +1

    Very informative, thank you

  • @mattinchley8561
    @mattinchley8561 Рік тому +1

    Another awesome video Chris, cheers

  • @ZijZijnZijnZoons
    @ZijZijnZijnZoons 10 місяців тому +1

    Great introduction to WiFi! Thanks for the info!

  • @jimlynch9390
    @jimlynch9390 Рік тому +1

    Very informative, thanks, Chris.

  • @genericelaf1007
    @genericelaf1007 9 місяців тому +1

    You always make amazing videos. Thanks

  • @chrisross-smith4358
    @chrisross-smith4358 Рік тому +1

    Another fantastic easy to understand educational tutorial. Great graphics beautifully explained. Well done sir.😊

  • @tubeDude48
    @tubeDude48 Рік тому +1

    Nice presentation, Chris. 👍

  • @r0galik
    @r0galik 8 місяців тому +1

    Very nicely explained

  • @keithwhite2986
    @keithwhite2986 Рік тому +1

    Very insightful presentation 🧠

  • @martyb3783
    @martyb3783 Рік тому +1

    Very interesting and informative video.

  • @johncundiff7075
    @johncundiff7075 Рік тому +1

    Brilliant as always Mr. Barnatt!

  • @annierenard5954
    @annierenard5954 Рік тому +1

    very educational, thank you

  • @markjustus
    @markjustus Рік тому +1

    Great explanation! Thanx!

  • @burgermeister7244
    @burgermeister7244 7 місяців тому

    I swear, Chris. Your videos are great. I've said it before but I'll say it again: I'm a huge fan.

  • @warrengibson7898
    @warrengibson7898 Рік тому +1

    Thanks, very informative

  • @bfapple
    @bfapple Рік тому +6

    At least it makes more sense than USB 3.x

  • @jwbowen
    @jwbowen Рік тому +1

    Great content as always, Chris!

  • @adrianwilliams763
    @adrianwilliams763 Рік тому

    Excellent and informative

  • @TrollingAround
    @TrollingAround Рік тому +1

    Another great video, thank you.

  • @temyraverdana6421
    @temyraverdana6421 Рік тому

    Thanks, a very useful lesson

  • @domjrl
    @domjrl Рік тому

    Super helpful video! I always wondered what the difference was between Wi-Fi 5 and 6. Thank you!

  • @KaptainCnucklz
    @KaptainCnucklz Рік тому +1

    Exactly what I was looking for. Surprisingly, this was infinitely more informative than all those "best adapter settings" videos. Thank you for the info. :)

  • @leskaighin8903
    @leskaighin8903 Рік тому +1

    Very informative and clear. I never realised the bay difference the quality of equipment could make.

  • @oliverbatt3559
    @oliverbatt3559 Рік тому +1

    Another excellent video, Chris!

  • @markallen8733
    @markallen8733 Рік тому +1

    Very informative. Keep making great videos.

  • @rustlebruxz0013
    @rustlebruxz0013 Рік тому +1

    Very good video, thanks.

  • @ronaldmarshall5845
    @ronaldmarshall5845 Рік тому +2

    Great Job Chris! You have made me want to go out and buy a new WiFi router lol! As always, enjoyed the infi very much!

  • @AMDRADEONRUBY
    @AMDRADEONRUBY Рік тому +2

    Nice a new video just in time about Wifi yeah we cant live without wifi these days for my part i have 6E and i love it .

  • @BobDoe_69
    @BobDoe_69 Рік тому +1

    I am terribly weak when it comes to networking, so I really appreciate this one

  • @althomas6045
    @althomas6045 Рік тому +2

    excellent again and as always. thank you.

  • @mdavid1955
    @mdavid1955 Рік тому +1

    Nice explanation...I never knew all the standards or the real history of WFi.