Actually, scientific research has proven multiple times that depressurization is one of the factors that drives magma toward the surface to erupt. This has been concluded as a result of studies on projects to drill into volcanos in attempts to release pressure. Artificial attempts at cooling and depressurizing magma systems is believed to have many unintended, negative consequences, including making an eruption more likely, so regulars can still be considered just as dangerous as slumberers.
@@Egobyte83 You can't compare artificial depressurization with the natural process: the difference is too great. If you take your argument to its logical conclusion, then any eruption would give rise to many more and larger ones. That seldom happens. Maybe the fact that Stromboli erupts frequently is because its location facilitates rapid refill of its magma chamber, or the chamber itself is small
There are a few things I want to mention regarding these volcanoes, these are just suggestions (also sorry if the comment is too long): Stromboli is possibly more dangerous due to having historical landslides that often occur on the island of Stromboli. And those landslides trigger tsunamis which could cause damage and fatalities in the Mediterranean. Pinatubo is a strange volcano, because the geological record shows that the volcano enters centuries of dormancy after each major eruption. Before 1991, it majorly erupted around 1300-1400 AD. If I pick which volcano is more dangerous in the Philippines, it's the Taal Volcano (massive caldera lake, very active, and close to huge population center). Mauna Loa is a good pick. Because the volcano is potentially overdue for an eruption. And major towns are in the paths of potential lava flows. Mount Hood along with most of the Cascade mountain range volcanoes are not as active as other volcanic regions. Typical eruptions from these volcanoes often occur every 300 to 500 years. With Mount Saint Helens often a strange one for its frequent major eruptions. If I had to pick a more dangerous volcano, it's either Mount Saint Helens or Mount Rainer (Rainer has a mud flow deposit that reached Tacoma, Washington). Mount Fuji is a pretty good pick. Because of Japan's long history of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions and detailed history of each eruption. I do think Fuji can be dangerous for Tokyo in the future. Overall, great video, I just wanted to share what I have learned from other videos I watched.
I'm Filipino and I think you chose the right volcano for the country. Indeed Taal is way more dangerous than Pinatubo and recent studies show that Taal belonged to one of the WORLD'S most dangerous volcanoes. Other famous volcanoes in the Philippines like Pinatubo and Mayon didn't even made it to the list, which means that Taal would be a very terrifying volcano for the country (Also don't forget that its recent eruption was 2020)
As Rainier is consistently being rotted from the inside out, a major landslide and lahars are a constant threat, and don't require a major eruption to occur.
yep, I have been living in the PNW for more than 30 years. People keep hearing these so called experts saying Rainier may erupt. And it may but it's not showing any real signs of activity. At various times Mount Hood has had earthquakes and same with Mount Saint Helens.
@@carasmussen27 Mt. Hood is scary just because it is so close to Portland.... Even closer than Rainier is to Seattle, I believe. At least Shasta isn't close to any large cities.
Mt Hood is quite close to both Portland and Salem and any major eruption could have a potentially devastating impact on both cities and their surroundings.
i live at the base of mount Shasta on top of previous debris flows caused by the north face collapsing 350,000+ years ago... before it became the mountain you see today
The worrying thing with Mt Fuji is analysis of deposits left by previous eruptions indicate that it can erupt up two or three different types of magma at the same time resulting in eruptions that are extremely violent and explosive due to both the amount of gas in the magma's and violent chemical reactions between them producing yet more gas that tears the magma apart again resulting in particularly violent plinean style eruptions. If it were the Japanese government I would keep a very close eye on this volcano given that the longer a stratovolcano like this is quiet the bigger the eruption will be when it wakes up again. For example when Vesuvius destroyed Pompeii and Herculaneum in the famous AD 79 eruption it had been quiet - to the point that the summit was overgrown with lush vegetation and weathered to a largely flat plateau famously used as a base camp by Spartacus - for fifteen hundred years. Though speaking of Vesuvius I am surprised it wasn't on this video not to mention its even larger supervolcano neighbor Campe Flagrae which is also showing considerably uplift and gas emissions.
The upper magma chamber is filling and at some point in the near future will probably erupt.But not like the "2012"bs,still a substantial rhyolite blow.
@@g.r.fullertoniv4952 There is no evidence that the magma chambers are rising significantly. The land rises and falls over and over again. I may be misremembering, but I seem to recall that it is actually lower than it was a few decades ago. Both the USGS and Nick Zentner have covered Yellowstone in detail.
Actually, Rainier is not the most problematic of Washington’s volcanoes. That honor goes to Glacier Peak. The mountain is remote from large population centers, but it has the potential to be tremendously explosive. Government scientists are sufficiently concerned that they are now helicoptering in four advanced seismographic stations to monitor its behavior.
Washington State has more than its share of active volcanoes. I live about 25 miles from Mt. Baker, which is near the Canadian border. It used to emit steam, though hasn't done so recently.
Not even a mention of Vesuvius? Around 3 million people not including tourists are in it's direct path. No eruption for nearly 80 years, with an average of 45 between eruptions. Even though it's one of the most monitored systems in the world, it can go off with very little warning. Also the longer it waits the more violent and rapid the event will be. With tiny streets everywhere and so many to evacuate in possibly a very short amount of time. The death toll could be enormous.
I just got goosebumps reading your comment because I live there and I had a dream that felt much more like a prophecy of it going off. It was terrifying. I've told people about it just so that people are aware but you know things are going to happen how they're going to happen so that's life.
@@ananolastname1605 I use to watch this guy called Dutchcince, probably spelled wrong, he's being harrased and pretty much kicked off for telling the Truth. He can accurately tell when Earthquakes will hit. And with Volcanoes having many there kinda together. But that's how I found out about My.Shasta spewing steam. The MSM is hiding it, or was. I would definitely have an Evacuation plan. Try and have a survival kit. Or just be ready to meat the maker. I'm not running if something hits here. I'm by the Madrid Fault. Im In line for the tornadoes. Honestly after seeing this ad for a gay,trans barbie doll I've had it. And I think I'm ready. Stay Alert. Be Safe.
So sad that an eruption can cause so much devastation, i guess this is part of life and we dont have a say what mother nature dishes out we have to get on with it the best way we can.
Much as we don't like to admit or acknowledge it human beings never truly have a say in what mother nature does. She does what she want's, when she wants and when she gets mad the only choice we have is get out of the way or die.
@@wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 It depends on the type of lava. For example, the lava flows in the Canaries and Iceland remain pretty sterile for centuries. On the other hand, it is the eruptions of Etna that produce the very fertile soil on the island of Sicily.
I watched this video for just one reason, but more of that later... I think you need to adjust the text in your title. You're quite right in pointing out that Stromboli erupts almost constantly, but that means you should either take this one off your list, or re-word your title, since Stromboli is ALWAYS going to erupt soon! And as for the reason why I watched in the first place... Hooray! For once, a video maker avoided the sensationalist click bait trap and didn't stick Yellowstone on this list. I'm so tired of seeing content makers screaming that 'Yellowstone is going to erupt SOON' when nothing could be further from the truth. At last, we've a content maker who cares more for giving good, solid material than the alarmist tripe so many similar channels churn out!
Actually Michael, Italy has 6 active volcanoes and a number of dormant ones. Volcano are Campi Flegrei the most prominent. The Philippines have a number of active volcanoes suspected of gearing up to an eruption. Hakeakala might be dormant but the Big Islands' 3 and Loihi certainly are. There are about 15 volcanoes in the Cascades under surveillance. Hood latest eruptions in 18th century and I believe 1865 and possibly in 1907. The cones of the Cascades have a history of collapses. Fuji has periods of inactivity like many volcanoes, her last eruption was in 1707/08, a vei 4. The hummocks and scars on her slope clearly show her history of collapses....
Since this was posted a new volcano has appeared in Iceland very close to the site of the 2021 eruption. Fortunately it is unlikely to do much harm as the area is not inhabited and the nature of the eruption is not explosive. On the contrary, just as last year it is likely to benefit tourism enormously.
True, however Grimsvolten a large sub glacial volcano and Askja another biggie are both on yellow alert. That's to say nothing of Bardarbunga, Hekla or Katla all of which are readying themselves for a new show.
You know up until now, every so often there has been devastating events, specially now that we have electrical grids and all the megastructures and dams etc. Solar flares hit the earth before but not since the 1800s. Today it would shut down everything electronic
Solar flares hit the Earth frequently - just none of them have been X class events that can have major effect on electronics. A decade or so ago Southeastern Canada (Ontario?) was hit by such a flare that took down its grid. Since then, utilities have been working on ways to mitigate damage from such a future event. How much progress they have made is something I don't know.
I was expecting Yellowstone, one of the most famous cases of volcanoes that might erupt soon. It's overripe and there's a lot of activity under which can devastaste the whole country.
@@brandonholt6717 yeah scientists have gone on record saying it could thousands of years before it erupts.. like that's what they mean by soon/ Soon in geologic terms but not people terms lol
@@XxlivexlovexhatexX Actually the ones that know the most about it think it may not even be able to erupt any more. They are very open about not knowing for sure, but that’s hardly “soon” in geologic terms either. The USGS is pretty active in trying to educate people but the misinformation persists.
Mount Mayon, in Philippines, is probably of more concern; Mount Taal, too. And many others... Many in Indonesia are active and always on alert, yet none mentioned here. This is a strange list; despite having to cut it down to size (but why only 5?), it's still strange the ones that were chosen. ???
That time of eruption tends to be a one time occurrence. There will undoubtedly be another eruption on the island sometime in the next 40 - 100 years, but it is not likely to be from the same vent. There are numerous other vents/cones in the area where such single eruptions have occurred.
Not to nature. She tolerates us, gives what the laws demand, but doesn't give a crap one way or another. Every life IS significant, but every one of those mortal lives will end, yours and mine included.
Why would stromboli make this list and not Etna? Both are very active. Etna being more active. In my opinion both shouldn't be here because these are super active volcanoes that erupt almost every year or every other year.
Maybe should have been top 10 (?). Don't forget the volcanoes of Iceland...the Land of Fire and Ice. Anyone traveling in Europe in the last decade or so would remember the disruption of air travel thanks to an eruption in Iceland.
What if a volcano erupted, and then a hurricane hit that area, and then an asteroid hit that area, and then terrorists hit that area…all in the course of a week?
Quote:The Bright Day Is Done. However,major disasters in the first period will be felt in the US,huge earthquakes will cause land to split away from the California coastline,either to be submerged or form offshore islands. It is predicted that the east coast,too,will experience major earthquakes,devasting New York City and causing part of Manhattan to sink into the sea. Era of greatest distruction they predict,will occur in the second period. Mentions India,Japan,Mount Vesuvius,Mount Pelee in Martinique etc.
Total nonsense. The faults along the Pacific Coast are either submersion thrust faults or strike/slip faults running pretty much parallel to the coast. There is ONE area of the Eastern US where a massive quake is likely - and where it happened in recent history. I don't recall that models indicate major damage as far north as New York City. You can find predictions for just about anything - frequently by those that have little or no scientific knowledge for their predictions. The text you quoted appears to be one of those nonsense texts.
@@hobosorcerer Once you have evidence, you have trust, proof, honesty. Belief is merely blind trust aka faith. I get what you are saying. I really do. Your line is exactly what I've debated in my head about for many months whenever the topic arose. Your comedy didn't fall on deaf ears. Going on the title again, one must note the word "soon". Is that in one human's lifetime, Earth years based on the billions of years it's been here, or solar years, or even longer, galactic years. If galactic years, then all volcanoes will erupt in the next few seconds. YES, I upvoted your comment. It was funny and technically accurate.
The scientists say it is likely to be many centuries before there is an eruption at Yellowstone - and many believe that a devastating super eruption is no longer possible.
Yellowstone is not a traditional volcano like Mt. St Helens or Mt. Hood. Yellowstone is a super volcano Caldera and could destroy the United States if it erupted
@@ihl8608 Actually, Yellowstone consists of two or three overlapping caldera forming volcanoes. It is at the end of a progressive string of such volcanoes that started in what is now the Pacific Ocean. As the continent moved over the hot spot, the eruptions move NE relative on the continent. Rather than just make assertions, I suggest that you read the USGS pages devoted to Yellowstone. They contain a quite thorough discussion of Yellowstone and its possible future. Also view the video by Nick Zentner about PNW Supervolcanoes. ua-cam.com/video/NcreTTI9Rew/v-deo.html
The danger is not from the volcanoes that regularly erupt like Stromboli. That tends to relieve the pressure. The real danger is from the slumberers
Like Mt. St. Helens. That was horrific.
I AGREE‼️🌋 👍🏼…⛰⛰⛰💥🌋💥👎🏼
Actually, scientific research has proven multiple times that depressurization is one of the factors that drives magma toward the surface to erupt. This has been concluded as a result of studies on projects to drill into volcanos in attempts to release pressure. Artificial attempts at cooling and depressurizing magma systems is believed to have many unintended, negative consequences, including making an eruption more likely, so regulars can still be considered just as dangerous as slumberers.
@@Egobyte83 You can't compare artificial depressurization with the natural process: the difference is too great. If you take your argument to its logical conclusion, then any eruption would give rise to many more and larger ones. That seldom happens. Maybe the fact that Stromboli erupts frequently is because its location facilitates rapid refill of its magma chamber, or the chamber itself is small
Vesuvio and Campi Flegrei. Napoli and the surrounding area will be in trouble
I would have thought Mt Rainier would be on this list.
Me too.
Same.
nope don't expect mt rainier to go in atleast the next 200 yrs
@@earlrutledge5823 do u know about the bulge on the northern side?
@@sonnydayz2118 that's been there for many years just like a lot of people are freaking out over the earthquakes but it is normal thing
There are a few things I want to mention regarding these volcanoes, these are just suggestions (also sorry if the comment is too long):
Stromboli is possibly more dangerous due to having historical landslides that often occur on the island of Stromboli. And those landslides trigger tsunamis which could cause damage and fatalities in the Mediterranean.
Pinatubo is a strange volcano, because the geological record shows that the volcano enters centuries of dormancy after each major eruption. Before 1991, it majorly erupted around 1300-1400 AD. If I pick which volcano is more dangerous in the Philippines, it's the Taal Volcano (massive caldera lake, very active, and close to huge population center).
Mauna Loa is a good pick. Because the volcano is potentially overdue for an eruption. And major towns are in the paths of potential lava flows.
Mount Hood along with most of the Cascade mountain range volcanoes are not as active as other volcanic regions. Typical eruptions from these volcanoes often occur every 300 to 500 years. With Mount Saint Helens often a strange one for its frequent major eruptions. If I had to pick a more dangerous volcano, it's either Mount Saint Helens or Mount Rainer (Rainer has a mud flow deposit that reached Tacoma, Washington).
Mount Fuji is a pretty good pick. Because of Japan's long history of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions and detailed history of each eruption. I do think Fuji can be dangerous for Tokyo in the future.
Overall, great video, I just wanted to share what I have learned from other videos I watched.
I'm Filipino and I think you chose the right volcano for the country. Indeed Taal is way more dangerous than Pinatubo and recent studies show that Taal belonged to one of the WORLD'S most dangerous volcanoes. Other famous volcanoes in the Philippines like Pinatubo and Mayon didn't even made it to the list, which means that Taal would be a very terrifying volcano for the country (Also don't forget that its recent eruption was 2020)
I'm surprised that Mt Rainier, in the State of Washington (same as Mt. St. Helens) wasn't mentioned.
Yah same!
Seen Rainier...
I mean there are a lot, it’s prolly close to the top
Mount Hood?
As Rainier is consistently being rotted from the inside out, a major landslide and lahars are a constant threat, and don't require a major eruption to occur.
Mt. Shasta is another one that could explode. It's the second tallest volcano in the Cascades after Mt. Rainier.
yep, I have been living in the PNW for more than 30 years. People keep hearing these so called experts saying Rainier may erupt. And it may but it's not showing any real signs of activity. At various times Mount Hood has had earthquakes and same with Mount Saint Helens.
@@carasmussen27 Mt. Hood is scary just because it is so close to Portland.... Even closer than Rainier is to Seattle, I believe. At least Shasta isn't close to any large cities.
Mt Hood is quite close to both Portland and Salem and any major eruption could have a potentially devastating impact on both cities and their surroundings.
i live at the base of mount Shasta on top of previous debris flows caused by the north face collapsing 350,000+ years ago... before it became the mountain you see today
The worrying thing with Mt Fuji is analysis of deposits left by previous eruptions indicate that it can erupt up two or three different types of magma at the same time resulting in eruptions that are extremely violent and explosive due to both the amount of gas in the magma's and violent chemical reactions between them producing yet more gas that tears the magma apart again resulting in particularly violent plinean style eruptions.
If it were the Japanese government I would keep a very close eye on this volcano given that the longer a stratovolcano like this is quiet the bigger the eruption will be when it wakes up again. For example when Vesuvius destroyed Pompeii and Herculaneum in the famous AD 79 eruption it had been quiet - to the point that the summit was overgrown with lush vegetation and weathered to a largely flat plateau famously used as a base camp by Spartacus - for fifteen hundred years. Though speaking of Vesuvius I am surprised it wasn't on this video not to mention its even larger supervolcano neighbor Campe Flagrae which is also showing considerably uplift and gas emissions.
Both of the last 2 share the same magma chamber don't they?
@@vexile1239 No the magma chambers are separate and analysis of seismic data has not shown any connection between them.
@@AndrewJamesWilliams ah ok
The most concerning one is Yellowstone. The temperatures are continuously rising. Any of the volcanoes in the Pacific Northwest could explode as well.
Yellowstone isn’t going to erupt in our lifetime
The upper magma chamber is filling and at some point in the near future will probably erupt.But not like the "2012"bs,still a substantial rhyolite blow.
@@g.r.fullertoniv4952 There is no evidence that the magma chambers are rising significantly. The land rises and falls over and over again. I may be misremembering, but I seem to recall that it is actually lower than it was a few decades ago.
Both the USGS and Nick Zentner have covered Yellowstone in detail.
Campi Flegrei is also a super volcano that is showing more activity than Yellowstone and could wake up Vesuvio in the process as well
Love the video, the last one looks beautiful with all that scenery!
Actually, Rainier is not the most problematic of Washington’s volcanoes. That honor goes to Glacier Peak. The mountain is remote from large population centers, but it has the potential to be tremendously explosive. Government scientists are sufficiently concerned that they are now helicoptering in four advanced seismographic stations to monitor its behavior.
The geologists have rated the volcanoes around the world based on risk to people. Glacier Peak is not even on the list.
I've been to St. Helens a couple of times now and amazing how pretty it is now
@@ihl8608is it pretty there? I was debating seeing Rainier or St Helen’s but thought Rainier seemed nicer.
Washington State has more than its share of active volcanoes. I live about 25 miles from Mt. Baker, which is near the Canadian border. It used to emit steam, though hasn't done so recently.
Not even a mention of Vesuvius?
Around 3 million people not including tourists are in it's direct path. No eruption for nearly 80 years, with an average of 45 between eruptions. Even though it's one of the most monitored systems in the world, it can go off with very little warning. Also the longer it waits the more violent and rapid the event will be. With tiny streets everywhere and so many to evacuate in possibly a very short amount of time. The death toll could be enormous.
With a super volcano just on the other side of Naples also terrible place to put a main city in my mind lol
@@cincodadrinko2598 Unfortunately Volcanology wasn't around 2,600 years ago.
What about Mt.Shasta? It's spewing steam and on the verge of going off.
I just got goosebumps reading your comment because I live there and I had a dream that felt much more like a prophecy of it going off. It was terrifying. I've told people about it just so that people are aware but you know things are going to happen how they're going to happen so that's life.
@@ananolastname1605 I use to watch this guy called Dutchcince, probably spelled wrong, he's being harrased and pretty much kicked off for telling the Truth. He can accurately tell when Earthquakes will hit. And with Volcanoes having many there kinda together. But that's how I found out about My.Shasta spewing steam. The MSM is hiding it, or was. I would definitely have an Evacuation plan. Try and have a survival kit. Or just be ready to meat the maker. I'm not running if something hits here. I'm by the Madrid Fault. Im In line for the tornadoes. Honestly after seeing this ad for a gay,trans barbie doll I've had it. And I think I'm ready. Stay Alert. Be Safe.
Shhh...Don't talk about that one.The USGS might raid you!
I seem to recall that Shasta out-gasses almost continuously. So do a lot of other volcanoes. Shasta is on the watch list of West Coast Volcanoes.
@@buggsy5 I thought it just started. I guess I miss understood. Tnx for the info.
Great video 👍 interesting to wonder when and where the next eruption will occur and slightly terrifying to ponder the damage that will cause.. 🤔
You didnt mention the Phreatic eruption on Pinatubo on November 30 2021
So sad that an eruption can cause so much devastation, i guess this is part of life and we dont have a say what mother nature dishes out we have to get on with it the best way we can.
Much as we don't like to admit or acknowledge it human beings never truly have a say in what mother nature does. She does what she want's, when she wants and when she gets mad the only choice we have is get out of the way or die.
It also flourishes vegetation.
@@wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 It depends on the type of lava. For example, the lava flows in the Canaries and Iceland remain pretty sterile for centuries. On the other hand, it is the eruptions of Etna that produce the very fertile soil on the island of Sicily.
Lake Taal or Mt Bulusan 🌋 of Philippines 🇵🇭 are on the list too.
I watched this video for just one reason, but more of that later...
I think you need to adjust the text in your title. You're quite right in pointing out that Stromboli erupts almost constantly, but that means you should either take this one off your list, or re-word your title, since Stromboli is ALWAYS going to erupt soon!
And as for the reason why I watched in the first place... Hooray! For once, a video maker avoided the sensationalist click bait trap and didn't stick Yellowstone on this list. I'm so tired of seeing content makers screaming that 'Yellowstone is going to erupt SOON' when nothing could be further from the truth. At last, we've a content maker who cares more for giving good, solid material than the alarmist tripe so many similar channels churn out!
Actually Michael, Italy has 6 active volcanoes and a number of dormant ones. Volcano are Campi Flegrei the most prominent. The Philippines have a number of active volcanoes suspected of gearing up to an eruption. Hakeakala might be dormant but the Big Islands' 3 and Loihi certainly are. There are about 15 volcanoes in the Cascades under surveillance. Hood latest eruptions in 18th century and I believe 1865 and possibly in 1907. The cones of the Cascades have a history of collapses. Fuji has periods of inactivity like many volcanoes, her last eruption was in 1707/08, a vei 4. The hummocks and scars on her slope clearly show her history of collapses....
Since this was posted a new volcano has appeared in Iceland very close to the site of the 2021 eruption. Fortunately it is unlikely to do much harm as the area is not inhabited and the nature of the eruption is not explosive. On the contrary, just as last year it is likely to benefit tourism enormously.
True, however Grimsvolten a large sub glacial volcano and Askja another biggie are both on yellow alert. That's to say nothing of Bardarbunga, Hekla or Katla all of which are readying themselves for a new show.
I will go if my time has come. Nothing I can do. Thanks for the video.
Yes. I have been shocked to realize just how many volcanoes there are. Even in places like GERMANY!
New Zealand has many, worst is the Kermadec islands
You know up until now, every so often there has been devastating events, specially now that we have electrical grids and all the megastructures and dams etc. Solar flares hit the earth before but not since the 1800s. Today it would shut down everything electronic
Solar flares hit the Earth frequently - just none of them have been X class events that can have major effect on electronics. A decade or so ago Southeastern Canada (Ontario?) was hit by such a flare that took down its grid. Since then, utilities have been working on ways to mitigate damage from such a future event. How much progress they have made is something I don't know.
@@buggsy5 obviously. I mean something big enough to cause destruction I said devastating events, not mini flares hehe.
@@buggsy5 we wouldn't have northern lights if we didn't get flares often. Just aren't destructive huge ones.
I was expecting Yellowstone, one of the most famous cases of volcanoes that might erupt soon. It's overripe and there's a lot of activity under which can devastaste the whole country.
the whole country?
Yellowstone would devastate the entire world. its an Extinction level event
Yellowstone won’t ever be on a list like this because scientists do not expect it to erupt anytime soon.
@@brandonholt6717 yeah scientists have gone on record saying it could thousands of years before it erupts.. like that's what they mean by soon/ Soon in geologic terms but not people terms lol
@@XxlivexlovexhatexX Actually the ones that know the most about it think it may not even be able to erupt any more. They are very open about not knowing for sure, but that’s hardly “soon” in geologic terms either. The USGS is pretty active in trying to educate people but the misinformation persists.
@@The_Ninedalorian Only if it erupted as a supervolcano. There is no indication that such an event is at all probable.
Any of 500+ volcanoes could erupt "soon". Soon being within the next ten thousand years. "Soon" is being mis-represented in this video.
Mount Mayon, in Philippines, is probably of more concern; Mount Taal, too. And many others... Many in Indonesia are active and always on alert, yet none mentioned here. This is a strange list; despite having to cut it down to size (but why only 5?), it's still strange the ones that were chosen. ???
Let’s hope La Palma doesn’t erupt again.
That time of eruption tends to be a one time occurrence. There will undoubtedly be another eruption on the island sometime in the next 40 - 100 years, but it is not likely to be from the same vent. There are numerous other vents/cones in the area where such single eruptions have occurred.
What about the mayon vucano in the Philippines?
That is one that we don’t hear much about anymore and Mayan has a violent history.
What about Mt. Shasta?
How about Mount Popo between Mexico City and Puebla that is also behaving the same way.
Soon the entire ring or fire is going to say hello 🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋🌋
Volcanoes are not found everywhere! There are in specific areas. Don't make people worry about one opening up in their own back yard.
If The expected Cascadia earthquake happens, the subduction zone probably would set off the volcanoes in the cascade range .
I thought they outlawed volcanoes because their carbon output and contribution to climate change😅
To put it another way, one medium eruption like Pinatubo can put years of human effort to reduce CO2 to shame.
What significance is it if there are a thousand people affected by volcano activity or a million people? Even one life is significant.
Not to nature. She tolerates us, gives what the laws demand, but doesn't give a crap one way or another. Every life IS significant, but every one of those mortal lives will end, yours and mine included.
Not a mention on Campi Flegrei?
Why would stromboli make this list and not Etna? Both are very active. Etna being more active. In my opinion both shouldn't be here because these are super active volcanoes that erupt almost every year or every other year.
Maybe should have been top 10 (?). Don't forget the volcanoes of Iceland...the Land of Fire and Ice. Anyone traveling in Europe in the last decade or so would remember the disruption of air travel thanks to an eruption in Iceland.
The voice of the narrator is familiar.... The of the underworld YT channel 🙈❤️
Who’s here after Mauna Loa erupted?
What if a volcano erupted, and then a hurricane hit that area, and then an asteroid hit that area, and then terrorists hit that area…all in the course of a week?
Isn't Yellowstone the larges active volcano on the planet?
Very 👍
Stromboli always erupts. I would be more concerned about Campi Flegrei then Stromboli.
Yellowstone should have made the list. It's acting funny lately!
What about the Yellowstone caldera?
Not gona be on a list of volcanoes scientists expect to erupt soon because scientists do not expect it to erupt soon.
The Yellow Volcano is also one...
How about Anak Krakatoa?
First one I thought of!
Small but Terrible!..The Taal Volcano in the Philippine province of Batangas is the World's deadliest volcano!..
Quote:The Bright Day Is Done.
However,major disasters in the first period will be felt in the US,huge earthquakes will cause land to split away from the California coastline,either to be submerged or form offshore islands.
It is predicted that the east coast,too,will experience major earthquakes,devasting New York City and causing part of Manhattan to sink into the sea.
Era of greatest distruction they predict,will occur in the second period.
Mentions India,Japan,Mount Vesuvius,Mount Pelee in Martinique etc.
The only people who predict any of the things you mentioned are people who don’t know what they are talking about. None of that is true.
@@brandonholt6717 You are so right, have a good day.
Total nonsense. The faults along the Pacific Coast are either submersion thrust faults or strike/slip faults running pretty much parallel to the coast.
There is ONE area of the Eastern US where a massive quake is likely - and where it happened in recent history. I don't recall that models indicate major damage as far north as New York City.
You can find predictions for just about anything - frequently by those that have little or no scientific knowledge for their predictions. The text you quoted appears to be one of those nonsense texts.
Going on the title alone: a scientist who believes, isn't an honest scientist.
You can believe things... based on evidence.
@@hobosorcerer Once you have evidence, you have trust, proof, honesty. Belief is merely blind trust aka faith. I get what you are saying. I really do. Your line is exactly what I've debated in my head about for many months whenever the topic arose. Your comedy didn't fall on deaf ears. Going on the title again, one must note the word "soon". Is that in one human's lifetime, Earth years based on the billions of years it's been here, or solar years, or even longer, galactic years. If galactic years, then all volcanoes will erupt in the next few seconds.
YES, I upvoted your comment. It was funny and technically accurate.
@@hobosorcerer I think that a theory is someone saying, "I believe this happens..." as you say, based on evidence, but not yet proved.
Geology hub Must see this Real Actual Documentary
Hi, I am living in Saitama, Japan, and my home is only 92km(about 57miles) distance from Mt.Fuji. Goodbye everyone…
Oh, stop the drama, I hope you and your family will be just fine.
You're not fact checking. As usual.
Also do coin tossing which is just as reliable as "fact checking"
Well, I am The Master of The Floor is Lava.
I think 🧐 I think 🤔 I have the runs I am about to explode 🤯
pinatubo will erupt again 12.4 .6322
Pretty sure you're mistaking scientists for something else - not much believing in Science...
Did you forget that Tonga over took pinatubo ?
Yo
what about Yellowstone?
The scientists say it is likely to be many centuries before there is an eruption at Yellowstone - and many believe that a devastating super eruption is no longer possible.
Yellowstone is not a traditional volcano like Mt. St Helens or Mt. Hood. Yellowstone is a super volcano Caldera and could destroy the United States if it erupted
@@ihl8608 Actually, Yellowstone consists of two or three overlapping caldera forming volcanoes. It is at the end of a progressive string of such volcanoes that started in what is now the Pacific Ocean. As the continent moved over the hot spot, the eruptions move NE relative on the continent.
Rather than just make assertions, I suggest that you read the USGS pages devoted to Yellowstone. They contain a quite thorough discussion of Yellowstone and its possible future. Also view the video by Nick Zentner about PNW Supervolcanoes. ua-cam.com/video/NcreTTI9Rew/v-deo.html
@@buggsy5 good to know.
Why does your voice sound like underworld?
Fuji eruption 2022 confirmed
er seem to have forgotten Etna and Vesuvius plus Krakatoa.
those volcanoes arent gonna erupt soon.. unlike the mentioned on the video.
@Powerz not upload i know mt. Vesuvius very well I'm not living under a rock..
@Powerz not upload then be it..
The same one’s as pushing the pox?
Volcanoes are scary and annoying and cool
Volcanoes are our natural line of defense against the seas.
So why the hell do humans live on or near volcanoes
Often because sometimes the volcanic soils are very fertile.
The soils make great wines.
We're gonna die !!!
Rainbow flag it
What about Mount Rainier?