Rates and Returns (2024/2025 CFA® Level I Exam - Quantitative Methods - Module 1)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @Priyanka-zy9ln
    @Priyanka-zy9ln 8 місяців тому +14

    thank you so... much for this explanation and thanks a lot for making it free cuz there are a lot of students who cant afford for these coaching

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  8 місяців тому +1

      Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could leave us a review at www.trustpilot.com/review/analystprep.com

  • @shortslayer13
    @shortslayer13 9 місяців тому +2

    I just finished this chapter and your video is great for revision and confirm my understandings :) Thank you Professor!

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  9 місяців тому

      Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review

  • @lisajackson9222
    @lisajackson9222 5 місяців тому +2

    Came over here from FM. Thanks for the different perspective!

  • @mohitaggarwal1411
    @mohitaggarwal1411 23 дні тому

    40:24 HPR year 1 should be negative -0.1136 ?

  • @semanius
    @semanius 5 місяців тому +1

    I'm confused. In 51:43. (1 + real return) = (1+ Nominal risk free rate).... ???

  • @patriciaxXx
    @patriciaxXx 9 місяців тому +3

    I am really grateful! Well presented! :)

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  9 місяців тому

      Glad you think so. If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review

  • @joytheboy7730
    @joytheboy7730 7 місяців тому

    For the Time-Weighted Return Example at 40:00, shouldn't the Time-Weighted Return be 17.5%? It's 17.4675% which should be rounded up, right?

  • @denissubbotin1587
    @denissubbotin1587 7 місяців тому +3

    Hello, I did not quite get the solution for real return. Why did we ignore the rest of the stuff?

  • @hibulaj
    @hibulaj 7 місяців тому +1

    Hi Prof, really appreciate your video. Can you please make a playlist containing CFA Level 1 2024 programme? Really appreciate

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  7 місяців тому

      All 2024/2025 premium videos, including study notes, question bank, mock exams, and formula sheet are available in the following package: analystprep.com/shop/cfa-level-3-complete-course-by-analystprep/

  • @mostafaemad740
    @mostafaemad740 6 місяців тому

    thanks but how you calculate the 90 percentiles for the winsorized mean

  • @jashshah6368
    @jashshah6368 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks a lot for your tutorial.

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  7 місяців тому

      Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review

  • @smitagawade5726
    @smitagawade5726 3 місяці тому

    Request you to upload videos for quants cfa level 1 of calculators
    EACH SUM OF TOPIC WITH USE OF CALCULATOR

  • @SteynLars
    @SteynLars 9 місяців тому

    Hi, great video! I have a question regarding the Harmonic mean. You mentioned that the it takes into account the amounts invested in the example ($2000, $3000, $4000), however the solution only takes into account the price of the shares. Therefore if the amounts invested were different, the answer would have remained the same as the above mentioned amounts were not used in the calculation? Am I missing something?

  • @МӨНХТУЛГАГанбаяр
    @МӨНХТУЛГАГанбаяр 6 місяців тому +1

    Is the answer of harmonic mean correct? Can we still use the same formula when we are not using fixed amount of investment?

    • @mohammedaldossary7379
      @mohammedaldossary7379 Місяць тому

      No. The weighted average is more appropriate to use in this case. The arithmetic mean is actually closer to the actual mean. The harmonic mean used in this case is a misapplication because you have different amounts of investments used in different periods

  • @chrissyification1
    @chrissyification1 9 місяців тому

    Is there any way we can calculate the annualized return example (Bond A 120 days, Bond B 8 months..) on ICONV?

  • @Avocado08074
    @Avocado08074 9 місяців тому +1

    Very helpful thank you

    • @analystprep
      @analystprep  8 місяців тому

      Glad it was helpful! If you like our video lessons, it would be appreciated if you could take 2 minutes of your time to leave us a Google review using this link: g.page/r/CQIlM78xSg01EB0/review

  • @noufalsaadi8878
    @noufalsaadi8878 8 місяців тому

    Hello
    How did you come up with 0.97 in the Geometric mean return?

  • @RonnieSportz
    @RonnieSportz 4 місяці тому +10

    Not trying to be too picky but you often assume you're talking to people who have (or are getting) a degree in finance. I do not have that background so many times, these "elementary" ideas are new to me. Comments that suggest I should already know this material are both discouraging and unhelpful. But I like your videos, so I appreciate the content and it is (for the most part) helpful.

    • @musad849
      @musad849 2 місяці тому

      If you can't understand - it means, this is far ahead of you.

    • @RonnieSportz
      @RonnieSportz 2 місяці тому

      @@musad849 I disagree