Hello J perm! Thanks for your comment.There may be some misunderstandings. Actually we call these versions single magnetic/ double magnetic/ triple magnetic/ super magnetic. Firstly, the so-called half-maglev version is the triple magnetic version, we don't call it maglev, the magnet ring in center piece is aim to align automatically on 45° by repulsing corner feet magnets, and it's the same with the super magnetic version. Secondly, the magnet strengths are much more stronger than our expection, for the megnet capsules were thinner than the original setting, and we didn't notice that until we had sent them out. So these test versions are inferior products in some way. We have changed it in the final version, which will have morderate magnets. Finally, the version and adjustment introduction are still under producing, sorry for we didn't make it in the test version, but we will add it in the final version. Anyway, thanks for your advice, we have made many adjustments accroding to cubers' feedback, hope you could enjoy the final version 🥺
I'm afraid these mistakes in communication will make the promotion in the future much harder. So far this video has almost 100K views, and yet less than 10 clicks on this comment. 99.99% of people did not receive this explanation.
About the “half/maglev”, the magnet ring isn’t designed for the elasticity, it’s meant as another magnetic alignment location that attracts to small magnets in the tips of the edge feet.
@@aafragz3746 It doesn't have to exist in your cube to say Magnet Noise doesn't. Take my RS3M 20 for example. The spring noise for some reason fixed itself after lubing it for the first time... never heard it again. The people complaining about Magnet Noise are also saying that it's more annoying than Spring Noise.
The funniest thing about this is that someone is going to buy the half maglev thinking they get to try out maglev, but not as strong, then they're just going to get the regular old spring system. Top tier snake oil here.
thank you so much dylan, discovered your channel in september of the last year and started learning the 3x3 and then the 4x4 and 5x5, today i am sub-20 and still watching your videos to improve, such an high quality content, deserves being the first cubing channel to have 1 mi subs.
Thank you so much for everything you do J Perm. I got back into cubing recently; and learned CFOP for the first time. I used to use a self-created weird method for 3x3 and 4x4+. But you taught me everything I know about good cubing practices!
3:55 with 6 Magnets in each corner piece (each with another magnet it's attracted to) and 6 magnets in each center piece 6:55, there's a total of 132 in the full maglev version. At this point I'm pretty sure the name is about trying to fit more magnets into a 3x3 than any other company.
Btw J perm: the reason why the magnet are so strong is because this is just a sample version, they have said in the final product, they will make the magnets weaker.
They are samples they sent to cubers for feedback. Based on the feedback they are making changes. They also didn’t have instructions in the samples because they weren’t printed yet. Final product will be different.
I found your channel and got back into cubing thanks to it :) One thought when you show clips of you cubing and entering times on your laptop. You haven't thought about getting a USB numpad? That way you could place it next to the mouse and avoid having to lean forward over the table to enter the numbers.
I want to know, there have been lots of innovations and improvements in 3x3s over the last few years from customizable options like tensions and magnets and even maglev which I think is a huge step, what I want to know is why haven't other companies imported some of these improvements to bigger cubes like 4x4, 5x5, etc. I don't know business maybe they wouldn't sell but it's not like they have had huge upgrades in the past few years, only sidegrades for 4x4 and just the MGCs for the others. I would love a maglev 4x4 for example. The tension stuff is probably really hard for even cubes but I'd still like to see some improvements in bigger cubes.
@@JPerm I'd imagine that GAN being one of the more innovative companies has something in development, but given how badly the 460 flopped since it sucked they are probably taking a lot of time with it. In terms of other companies Moyu already has the best 4x4s and they are doing maglev so a maglev 4x4 shouldn't be too far off. Aosu Maglev 2022 WR M? (6 word name I love it lmao)
@@aafragz3746 Flop is probably a bad word, but given their status atop 3x3s as being very premium and top quality for the 460 to not come up as a recommendation from most cubers is definitely a failure.
The biggest problem is space constraint. The middle layer of an even cube is a T shape, not a big rectangle like a 3x3 (and at least bigger odd cubes have a bit of rectangular space around the screw for you to do something, in particular the MGC5's one is pretty good). But for an even cube, finding space to insert 2 big flat metal discs, or cutting out an internal cylindrical cup from the stem of the T shape is a problem. Thickening the stem of the T shape would mean less space for the outer 2 layers to hook under, making the cube less stable. I thought about cutting up the stem portion to repurpose part of the stem for dual adjsutment, to avoid the need for a "double wall", but that requires detaching the center piece from the core, and it simply won't work because of how the XB allignement mechanism works. The center piece is made of a circle and a square, and the circle cannot move. This means that you need the center to descend all the way to the core and attach to the core. I ended up creating my own allignment mech to get around the limitations of XB and Eashsheen, not requiring the center piece to have a bump on top that links all the way down to the core, yet still allowing the corners to descend deep into the cube (something Eastsheen couldn't do. They put a big block in the core to asymmetrically hook the second layer. As a plus, the centers can detach from the core and the mechanism would still work, allowing for Yuexiao-style designs. But as a minus, it meant that the outer layer has to be shallow or else it will clash with the internal block). Unfortunately 3D printing precision isn't good enough for the 2 halves of the dual adjustment mech to fit perfectly, and the material has so much friction the dual adjsutment mech dosen't turn, and it would cost another huge sum of money to make another prototype. Would probably need to hired as a designer and have asses to injection molding to fully publish my design. However, the allignemnt mech works, and the middle layer of 3D printed 4x4 dosen't misallign. I think the Gan 460's allignment mech also works in a similar way, but it imposes it's own design restricitons that my 4x4 also somewhat avoided. Magnet adjustment systems however, are not even embedded in the internal mechanism, but exists in the external parts, so technically it should be extremely easy for a company to create magnet adjustable 4x4s. Given Moyu's resources, they can simply copy-paste the Aosu WR, GTS2 or Meilong 4x4 mechanism, but modify one of the edge halves to accomodate the Yuexiao EDM magnet switches on both sides. The magnet switches only need to be off-centered due to the double magnets of the inner layer, but it's not big off a deal. Plus that actually allows the user to adjust the inner and outer magnets independently of each other, allowing for choices like "equal inners and outers" and "slightly stronger inners", therefore satisfying both people who want more control in the 3x3 stage, and people who want a more consistent feeling cube. As for mods, a core-mag Aochuang WR hand mod isn't hard to do (I did it and it made the cube a lot more stable, also have an Aoshi GTS version of the mod). But Gan probably has the rights to do it, so if Moyu to produced an official version, it would look like obvious copying.
i just got the “half maglev” or the triple mag or the blue one or whatever you want to call it and honestly i love it it’s super fast like the fastest cube i’ve ever turned and the magnets are ridonkulously strong but it’s so light and satisfying to turn definitely not for everyone but i like my cubes to be chaotic so i love it
I know the Dayan Tenyun V1 is praised for how quiet is, but can you make a video with a bunch of quiet cubes and measure the decibels of each one? I want to find the quietest speed cube.
Hi J Perm thanks to you I found cubing and can solve the 4x4 and 5x5 thanks to you, I have an average of 30 seconds with the 3x3 maybe you can give me a few tips that would be great. Thanks to your F2L tricks, I have already improved and I take your website too. Thanks for the video😊. You don't have to thank you for watching your videos, we should thank you for doing it at all. 👍🙃,,Hope you can read Chinese“ is legend😂
The full maglev thing according to more try is supposed to do same thing as gan 12 maglev which is auto-alignment. But I couldn't see that in the video so may be it's wrong.
@Qwery Actually by this time i did. When i commented no. I commented this cause jperm mentioned the stronger magnets thing, and that makes moretry look bad. So i think would be better to get a review with the newer ones. Also i think the half-maglev is a miss translattion, actually in other videos is "triple system" and i think is cause it has magnets ilike the valk elite, but not in the inside of the center, they are in the exterior
The maglev adjsutment system works so weirdly because it has similar amount of compression, but springs force is proporional to the x, where x is compression distance, while magnet force is proportional to the 1/x^2, where x is distance between magnets, so for the same distance change maglevs force increases more than springs force
Hello J Perm. Great video! I also have a suggestion for a scramble: D' F R' D2 L2 U L R2 U' F2 R2 D L2 B2 U' L2 D2 L2 D2 R F' Do white cross. I made about 20s(my PB) maybe you can do it faster.
Hey JPerm, could you make a video on how to scramble Rubiks cube faster? Is there any pattern that you follow when you look at the computer-generated notations? Which fingers do you use for which moves etc.
1.its called a rubiks cube 2. you dont need a tutorial on scrambling the cube, when you become faster and lean more advanced finger tricks it will just come naturally
yes actually j perm has lots of videos on move notation(the pattern to follow) and finger tricks(so you turn better) and also which fingers to use for which moves in his tutorial of how to solve a rubiks cube in 10 min vid i think. if not, reply to me and i will figure out the videos you should watch
Typically speaking a scramble only needs 10-15 moves, and there are some softwares that allow computer generated algorithms, tho it might take longer than just scrambling randomly
It's very sad that so many people watching these reviews don't know that these are just the test versions and that in the final release the cubes will have moderate magnets and a instruction on how to customize the cube. I feel like a lot of people will get a bad image of MoreTry although the cube is actually pretty good
Doing F2L 2-look OLL and 2-look PLL (except for 2 extra PLL algorithms that I learnt) my PB is 15.81s. Just wait a while and practice. Your opportunity will come.
Hey big dawg will you be coming out with more of your cubes on speed cube shop or no. I am really new to cubeing like maybe 3 weeks in new lol. But thanks to you I have solved my first cube to show my little girl how, but now I'm hooked lol. You make really great and easy to understand videos. Keep it up.
I think the Washer in the Half Maglev is actually the magnet but flipped so it won’t repel. It’s called Half Maglev because it uses springs and magnets.
Just for the j a perm algorithm you just earned a like(I am already subscribed) I have been looking for that wide r j perm after learning about a better j a perm from tingman
Thankyou for your tutorial on solving the Rubix Cube 3x3x3, I was 7 years old and I was told that I could solve the Cube with in 30 seconds, How ever I was in an Accident when I was 12 years old and I lost all my memory of the first 12 years of my life and I have never been able to solve the cube again, I love puzzles and the Cube has always been my favorite, Thanks to your easy solve in 10 minutes 3x3x3 cube, I have finally solved my 2 Cubes (one is the 40th anniversary cube other is normal), Once I can solve it from memory, Time to get me a Speed Cube :) Thanks again.
i saw your full oll and full pll tutorial and took pictures of every single algorithm . then i tried a solve using the pictures and in the first solve i did oll then gues what pll i got a j perm lets go
hello J perm. These cubes are have some pretty cool new features, the full maglev version has 6 magnets, weird. I have a suggestion for the next vid, you could "fix" the full maglev version by taking out 4/6 of the magnets as 6 magnets probably would have more friction than springs. Hope you read this comment. Love your vids as always, keep up the good work!
What do you think of the name "MoreTry"? 😬
To try to make more cubes than gan and have a easier and more understandable naming system than gan
I think they meant to say "try more to turn our cube"
Elaborated, TryMore wanted to be try turning anything more
It's about trying more so you get good at that thing
they should try more
Hello J perm! Thanks for your comment.There may be some misunderstandings. Actually we call these versions single magnetic/ double magnetic/ triple magnetic/ super magnetic.
Firstly, the so-called half-maglev version is the triple magnetic version, we don't call it maglev, the magnet ring in center piece is aim to align automatically on 45° by repulsing corner feet magnets, and it's the same with the super magnetic version.
Secondly, the magnet strengths are much more stronger than our expection, for the megnet capsules were thinner than the original setting, and we didn't notice that until we had sent them out. So these test versions are inferior products in some way. We have changed it in the final version, which will have morderate magnets.
Finally, the version and adjustment introduction are still under producing, sorry for we didn't make it in the test version, but we will add it in the final version.
Anyway, thanks for your advice, we have made many adjustments accroding to cubers' feedback, hope you could enjoy the final version
🥺
LOL IT'S THE REAL ONE!
I'm afraid these mistakes in communication will make the promotion in the future much harder. So far this video has almost 100K views, and yet less than 10 clicks on this comment. 99.99% of people did not receive this explanation.
Ayo they responded
Send them again and ask Jperm to make another video… or u just got urself fired lmao
SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH actual moretry company yt channel
"cause im sick...sick at turning!"
-J perm 2022
Lol
Hi
I was watching a video, saw the notification, and told myself, "This is more important"
Well I was doing maths
Same lol
@@saptarshidey9153 Im sick so I just decided to watch something. Math is amazing in my opinion
@@wolfyworthley3355 i love maths too👍
Same
About the “half/maglev”, the magnet ring isn’t designed for the elasticity, it’s meant as another magnetic alignment location that attracts to small magnets in the tips of the edge feet.
thats so confusing ! why call that maglev at all
@@mxBug "MagLev is a buzzword now.
@@mxBug mag levn't
@@mxBug Actually we didn't call it maglev, we call it triple magnetic, two sets of attracting magnets and a set of repulsing magnets
So thats like the Qiyi Valk?
Maglev sounds cooler than it actually is, but it's still fun to see new tech advancements
True. I still like it though, which I can't say about most "new" things they put in cubes 😂
There’s no spring noise Lol
@@aafragz3746
Some people complain about Magnet Noise.
@@thesphyrth there isn’t a noise tho?
@@aafragz3746
It doesn't have to exist in your cube to say Magnet Noise doesn't.
Take my RS3M 20 for example. The spring noise for some reason fixed itself after lubing it for the first time... never heard it again.
The people complaining about Magnet Noise are also saying that it's more annoying than Spring Noise.
8:50 Funnily enough, they use the Rarity System, but inverted:
Green - Uncommon
Blue - Rare
Purple - Epic
Orange - Legendary
@Nerdy Cuber ._.
Bro playing Fortnite
@@maryannfeguro6167 it’s the same for most games
hypixel skyblock rarity too
“My company is called NoTry and we don’t sell anything”
- Bottom of the credits
The funniest thing about this is that someone is going to buy the half maglev thinking they get to try out maglev, but not as strong, then they're just going to get the regular old spring system. Top tier snake oil here.
This is smart and stupid at the same time
thank you so much dylan, discovered your channel in september of the last year and started learning the 3x3 and then the 4x4 and 5x5, today i am sub-20 and still watching your videos to improve, such an high quality content, deserves being the first cubing channel to have 1 mi subs.
I’m totally up for more company’s coming to cubing! love all the different feels and styles we are getting now days
Thank you so much for everything you do J Perm. I got back into cubing recently; and learned CFOP for the first time. I used to use a self-created weird method for 3x3 and 4x4+. But you taught me everything I know about good cubing practices!
3:55 with 6 Magnets in each corner piece (each with another magnet it's attracted to) and 6 magnets in each center piece 6:55, there's a total of 132 in the full maglev version.
At this point I'm pretty sure the name is about trying to fit more magnets into a 3x3 than any other company.
I am still thinking about the 'Zed Perm'.
A lot of people wont get this reference lol
@@incinezard3466 x perm and dab perm
That was 3 years ago lol
And this: #savethebananaduck
Btw J perm: the reason why the magnet are so strong is because this is just a sample version, they have said in the final product, they will make the magnets weaker.
why tf would they make a sample version thats different??? shouldn't the sample be something to gain a 'taste' of what you're actually gonna buy?
They are samples they sent to cubers for feedback. Based on the feedback they are making changes. They also didn’t have instructions in the samples because they weren’t printed yet. Final product will be different.
@@adityas9377 samples are for the users to try the real thing. test products are for experimenting and improving
I love ur videos they really help me out to choose what 3x3 I should buy! ❤️
Welp, theres no way im even gonna be able to convince myself to get all of these, even if i really tried
You're just not trying hard enough. You need to moretry
@@JPerm Could you do an 800K Q and A?
Love your vids keep it up!
I found your channel and got back into cubing thanks to it :) One thought when you show clips of you cubing and entering times on your laptop. You haven't thought about getting a USB numpad? That way you could place it next to the mouse and avoid having to lean forward over the table to enter the numbers.
Bro, ur literally making me addicted to cubing day by day and now my pb (22.05) is all because of you 😊😊😊
Same but my pb is 17.76
How long have u been cubing
Yeah he's a really good teacher ☺️ my PB is 15.96 now because of him
(Ignore my profile pic it's not me)
yo i just got a new pb of 22.07 lol
@@ediegodiddy5784 Lol noice!!
@@marialexos I have been cubing for the past 3 years but, did not learn F2L for 2 years so that is why i have a little increaed time of solving cube
Me: These videos are so cool. I will never change these for anythi...
(Notification: Jperm....)
Me: Never mind 😁😁
I can’t stop watching your videos😁. I love your channel.
Nice work man , u made the unboxing interesting and ur reviews r usefull
i already saw cubicle’s video on this so i’m excited to see what jonathan permutation thinks of this
I want to know, there have been lots of innovations and improvements in 3x3s over the last few years from customizable options like tensions and magnets and even maglev which I think is a huge step, what I want to know is why haven't other companies imported some of these improvements to bigger cubes like 4x4, 5x5, etc. I don't know business maybe they wouldn't sell but it's not like they have had huge upgrades in the past few years, only sidegrades for 4x4 and just the MGCs for the others. I would love a maglev 4x4 for example. The tension stuff is probably really hard for even cubes but I'd still like to see some improvements in bigger cubes.
Yeah that's interesting! Maybe they just don't sell well enough to justify taking risks. I'd love a maglev 6x6... anything to make that thing faster
@@JPerm I'd imagine that GAN being one of the more innovative companies has something in development, but given how badly the 460 flopped since it sucked they are probably taking a lot of time with it. In terms of other companies Moyu already has the best 4x4s and they are doing maglev so a maglev 4x4 shouldn't be too far off. Aosu Maglev 2022 WR M? (6 word name I love it lmao)
@@PyrusnVentus the 460didn’t flop, it’s bad but a lot of people use it (which I don’t understand). it was their first attempt and creating a 4 by 4.
@@aafragz3746 Flop is probably a bad word, but given their status atop 3x3s as being very premium and top quality for the 460 to not come up as a recommendation from most cubers is definitely a failure.
The biggest problem is space constraint.
The middle layer of an even cube is a T shape, not a big rectangle like a 3x3 (and at least bigger odd cubes have a bit of rectangular space around the screw for you to do something, in particular the MGC5's one is pretty good). But for an even cube, finding space to insert 2 big flat metal discs, or cutting out an internal cylindrical cup from the stem of the T shape is a problem. Thickening the stem of the T shape would mean less space for the outer 2 layers to hook under, making the cube less stable.
I thought about cutting up the stem portion to repurpose part of the stem for dual adjsutment, to avoid the need for a "double wall", but that requires detaching the center piece from the core, and it simply won't work because of how the XB allignement mechanism works. The center piece is made of a circle and a square, and the circle cannot move. This means that you need the center to descend all the way to the core and attach to the core.
I ended up creating my own allignment mech to get around the limitations of XB and Eashsheen, not requiring the center piece to have a bump on top that links all the way down to the core, yet still allowing the corners to descend deep into the cube (something Eastsheen couldn't do. They put a big block in the core to asymmetrically hook the second layer. As a plus, the centers can detach from the core and the mechanism would still work, allowing for Yuexiao-style designs. But as a minus, it meant that the outer layer has to be shallow or else it will clash with the internal block). Unfortunately 3D printing precision isn't good enough for the 2 halves of the dual adjustment mech to fit perfectly, and the material has so much friction the dual adjsutment mech dosen't turn, and it would cost another huge sum of money to make another prototype. Would probably need to hired as a designer and have asses to injection molding to fully publish my design. However, the allignemnt mech works, and the middle layer of 3D printed 4x4 dosen't misallign. I think the Gan 460's allignment mech also works in a similar way, but it imposes it's own design restricitons that my 4x4 also somewhat avoided.
Magnet adjustment systems however, are not even embedded in the internal mechanism, but exists in the external parts, so technically it should be extremely easy for a company to create magnet adjustable 4x4s. Given Moyu's resources, they can simply copy-paste the Aosu WR, GTS2 or Meilong 4x4 mechanism, but modify one of the edge halves to accomodate the Yuexiao EDM magnet switches on both sides. The magnet switches only need to be off-centered due to the double magnets of the inner layer, but it's not big off a deal. Plus that actually allows the user to adjust the inner and outer magnets independently of each other, allowing for choices like "equal inners and outers" and "slightly stronger inners", therefore satisfying both people who want more control in the 3x3 stage, and people who want a more consistent feeling cube.
As for mods, a core-mag Aochuang WR hand mod isn't hard to do (I did it and it made the cube a lot more stable, also have an Aoshi GTS version of the mod). But Gan probably has the rights to do it, so if Moyu to produced an official version, it would look like obvious copying.
i just got the “half maglev” or the triple mag or the blue one or whatever you want to call it and honestly i love it it’s super fast like the fastest cube i’ve ever turned and the magnets are ridonkulously strong but it’s so light and satisfying to turn definitely not for everyone but i like my cubes to be chaotic so i love it
JPerm, I have been waiting A LONG TIME for the best cubes of 2022 video
The j perm “ I hope you can read Chinese” will never get old 😂 I love it
Hey J Perm! Could you do a "best speedcubes 2022". I've seen you do those for other years and would love to see this years one!
LOVE YOUR VIDS, thx for being my favorite youtuber
I know the Dayan Tenyun V1 is praised for how quiet is, but can you make a video with a bunch of quiet cubes and measure the decibels of each one? I want to find the quietest speed cube.
The quietest ones are tenyun v1 and tornado v2. They are almost the same. Get the one you like
Ask z3cubing to make the quietest cube. He has lots of spare time ☺
Hi J Perm thanks to you I found cubing and can solve the 4x4 and 5x5 thanks to you, I have an average of 30 seconds with the 3x3 maybe you can give me a few tips that would be great. Thanks to your F2L tricks, I have already improved and I take your website too. Thanks for the video😊. You don't have to thank you for watching your videos, we should thank you for doing it at all. 👍🙃,,Hope you can read Chinese“ is legend😂
Hey man if you're looking to get sub 30 watch how to be sub 20 and start practicing what he says you need
he has tutorials of sub x you can go watch them
Learn good finger tricks early on!
Hey j perm
@@JPerm ratio
nice video again! jperm keep up the great content I love it
Yes finally!! Best speedcubes of 2022 vid !!
Thank you for posting 😊
The half maglev version is the funniest thing I've seen this week
“ Hope you can read Chinese ”
This line makes me happy
yay new jperm video
also yessss a new best speedcubes video coming soon i’m looking forward to it!!! :D
me:the new cube brands are over
moretry:bonjour
me:im gonna start my own
One thing J Perm will always have:
the brown table
The full maglev thing according to more try is supposed to do same thing as gan 12 maglev which is auto-alignment. But I couldn't see that in the video so may be it's wrong.
I love your vids man keep it up
best speedcubes of 2022 pleasee!!!
"Hope you can read chineese"
Sun Tzu- the art of joking
"Hope you can read chinese"
- J Perm forever
More Try makes the most beautiful cube packaging so that it will caught the cubers' attentions
Jperm: Okie
I like its looks and the sound of the plastic
About the strong magnets i think moretry suposeed account write in the cubicle's review that they will change it to make it weaker
@Qwery Actually by this time i did. When i commented no. I commented this cause jperm mentioned the stronger magnets thing, and that makes moretry look bad. So i think would be better to get a review with the newer ones. Also i think the half-maglev is a miss translattion, actually in other videos is "triple system" and i think is cause it has magnets ilike the valk elite, but not in the inside of the center, they are in the exterior
Moretry seems like they previously made some cubes,they didn't like them and tried more and made this lmao
I am literally a beginner and solving the cube under 50 seconds
(12YRS OLD)i am really thankful to jperm for your vids..Thanks a lot
The maglev adjsutment system works so weirdly because it has similar amount of compression, but springs force is proporional to the x, where x is compression distance, while magnet force is proportional to the 1/x^2, where x is distance between magnets, so for the same distance change maglevs force increases more than springs force
Hello J Perm. Great video! I also have a suggestion for a scramble:
D' F R' D2 L2 U L R2 U' F2 R2 D L2 B2 U' L2 D2 L2 D2 R F'
Do white cross.
I made about 20s(my PB) maybe you can do it faster.
@@s.kishore3441 Its actually my PB
Great scramble
7.35, decent time😐
Hey JPerm, could you make a video on how to scramble Rubiks cube faster? Is there any pattern that you follow when you look at the computer-generated notations? Which fingers do you use for which moves etc.
1.its called a rubiks cube
2. you dont need a tutorial on scrambling the cube, when you become faster and lean more advanced finger tricks it will just come naturally
Just practice and do a lot of solves. Learning algorithms makes it easier although there are barely any algs for b moves
@@marovic78 done all of those and I am still not satisfied with my scrambling, sometime I can solve the cube faster than I scramble it..
yes actually j perm has lots of videos on move notation(the pattern to follow) and finger tricks(so you turn better) and also which fingers to use for which moves in his tutorial of how to solve a rubiks cube in 10 min vid i think. if not, reply to me and i will figure out the videos you should watch
Typically speaking a scramble only needs 10-15 moves, and there are some softwares that allow computer generated algorithms, tho it might take longer than just scrambling randomly
Yayy, best speedcube videos
looks sooo nice
It's very sad that so many people watching these reviews don't know that these are just the test versions and that in the final release the cubes will have moderate magnets and a instruction on how to customize the cube. I feel like a lot of people will get a bad image of MoreTry although the cube is actually pretty good
Hey J Perm, so my 3x3 PB is 21 seconds with f2l and I want to improve without having to learn full OLL/PLL. Do you have any tips or tricks?
Practice look ahead bro
You could try learning some very simple OLLs and PLLs apart from the 2 look OLL and PLLs
My PB is 16.66
Doing F2L 2-look OLL and 2-look PLL (except for 2 extra PLL algorithms that I learnt) my PB is 15.81s. Just wait a while and practice. Your opportunity will come.
@@port9426 I have learned 3 or 4 OLLs and once I got them mastered is when I got the 21
MoreTry has to TRY MORE
Hey guys…. Never gets old
HOPE YOU CAN READ CHINESE
fist
updated best cube video?! poggers
Interesting video 👍🏼
congrats on 800 k subs almost 1 m!
Dude i waited for this video a lot
Love ur videos
Love ur vids
Hey big dawg will you be coming out with more of your cubes on speed cube shop or no. I am really new to cubeing like maybe 3 weeks in new lol. But thanks to you I have solved my first cube to show my little girl how, but now I'm hooked lol. You make really great and easy to understand videos. Keep it up.
I think the Washer in the Half Maglev is actually the magnet but flipped so it won’t repel.
It’s called Half Maglev because it uses springs and magnets.
Jperm videos are the best get this man to 1 mil
ok now I know why my rs3m maglev is so tight thank you Dylan
I solved my first cube by warching your video.its been 6 days and i can do it in 1.2 min with beginner method.thank you.
Just for the j a perm algorithm you just earned a like(I am already subscribed)
I have been looking for that wide r j perm after learning about a better j a perm from tingman
I like that he everytime says : "hope you can read chinese"
Wooh! Can't wait for the "Best Speedcubes for 2022"
YES ANOTHER UNBOXING FINALLY
You will never change as always "hope you can read chineese" your videos always make my day keep it up btw. i think i wanna learn to read chinese
Thankyou for your tutorial on solving the Rubix Cube 3x3x3, I was 7 years old and I was told that I could solve the Cube with in 30 seconds, How ever I was in an Accident when I was 12 years old and I lost all my memory of the first 12 years of my life and I have never been able to solve the cube again, I love puzzles and the Cube has always been my favorite, Thanks to your easy solve in 10 minutes 3x3x3 cube, I have finally solved my 2 Cubes (one is the 40th anniversary cube other is normal), Once I can solve it from memory, Time to get me a Speed Cube :)
Thanks again.
BRO WHAT sorry for responding but actually though no cap?
I was waiting for this video when I saw Speedcubeshops video
i saw your full oll and full pll tutorial and took pictures of every single algorithm . then i tried a solve using the pictures and in the first solve i did oll then gues what pll i got a j perm lets go
Its all 'bout that anti-fog lens wipes, you definitely need one of those when cubing
Dylan is such a good cuber! 😄
hello J perm. These cubes are have some pretty cool new features, the full maglev version has 6 magnets, weird. I have a suggestion for the next vid, you could "fix" the full maglev version by taking out 4/6 of the magnets as 6 magnets probably would have more friction than springs. Hope you read this comment. Love your vids as always, keep up the good work!
Yehey neww Videoo!
Can you do a video series on learning oll, maybe releasing videos by shape group?
Half Maglev made me laugh. J Perm has a good commentary. :)
I love his finger tricks
J perm I love everything you do, can you do more how to be sub X videos but for events other than 3x3, like 4x4 or 5x5 or blindfolded?
Your pfp kills me
his rubix cube tutorial is the best tutorial
thats the only tutorial i understand
i
Shengshou 16x16, you know what time it is. “Solving a 16x16 like an 8x8 like a 4x4 like a 2x2”
8:57 I just forward this video to this time for just watching your solve, that is there any improvement in your solves or not 🔥
Havent heard jperm so disappointed in a while
"CUBE COMPANIES, WHY ARE U DOING THIS TO ME!"
- Jperm 2022
When is the best 2022 cubes vid coming out? Just thinking about getting a better 3x3 and debating whether I should wait.
This goes down as one of the greatest name in cubes
J Perm Please solve the petaminx and also your beginner tutorial are really helpful
Could you try switching the magnets strength by changing the edges?
I love you johnathan permutation
yay! Jonathan Permutation's new video!!!
YAY!! Its Johnathan Permutation