A321neo Engines Battle!! LEAP-1A VS. PW1100G, Landing & Takeoff Sound Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @LAXERJK
    @LAXERJK 11 місяців тому +10

    Pratt because it’s actually an innovative engine unliked the maxed out, hot running LEAP

    • @HunterHearstHelmsley
      @HunterHearstHelmsley  11 місяців тому +3

      PE1130G is indeed an innovative new generation engine, and its operating sound is also very unique.

  • @Roboseal2
    @Roboseal2 Рік тому +19

    Everyone thinks the leap is louder and is better but the p&w will make you sleep well lol.

  • @ohenry4834
    @ohenry4834 2 роки тому +13

    PW GTF all the way, because it's ear friendly. WHALE Engine roar!!!

  • @pierrecurie5188
    @pierrecurie5188 2 роки тому +12

    Well done! This is the best comparison video out there.

  • @boblackey1
    @boblackey1 10 місяців тому +4

    Both engines have durability ptoblems but the PW more so than Leap. And both had contaminated powder metal problems but Leap caught it before PW.
    Leap will be incorporating design improvements this year to improve durability and On Wing Time.
    PW is introducing the GTF Advantage in 2024 which is said to have 1 percent less fuel burn, more thrust, run a little cooler and much better Time On Wing.
    Hopefully both manufacturers have thing sorted out now.

  • @LongQuanVu-hu3gm
    @LongQuanVu-hu3gm 12 днів тому +1

    Cathay Pacific is A321-251NX. That means it is A321LR. China Airlines is A321-271NX. That means it is A321neo ACF

  • @LongQuanVu-hu3gm
    @LongQuanVu-hu3gm 12 днів тому +1

    The China's A321neo has 4 window exit near the wing while Cathay's A321neo has 2 window exit near the wing.

  • @frisolustig6349
    @frisolustig6349 Місяць тому +1

    Wow! Well clear the PW are leader. Great!

  • @HarrisPatrick
    @HarrisPatrick 10 місяців тому +6

    PW1100G often has equipment failures and requires maintenance. Recently, Vietnamese airlines🇻🇳 had to stop operating 44 types of A321 neo aircraft to hand over to Pratt & Whitney for inspection. Causes huge economic damage

    • @natebot321
      @natebot321 7 місяців тому

      Mostly due to the powdered metal issue unfortunately.

  • @amoredesto
    @amoredesto 2 роки тому +6

    4:02
    2:40

  • @wovkonstudios
    @wovkonstudios Рік тому +8

    PW1100G sounds better

  • @andrejrihter7074
    @andrejrihter7074 8 місяців тому +2

    PW is better that CFM

  • @Pz349
    @Pz349 Рік тому +10

    PW1100G > LEAP-1A

  • @willamisbezerra6970
    @willamisbezerra6970 2 роки тому +10

    Nice Vídeo ✈✈✈✈🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷👌👌👌

  • @EpicThe112
    @EpicThe112 Рік тому +2

    CFM Leap 1A > PW1100G. Another airport in the region where you can see it is MNL🇵🇭 where Leap X comes in from OZ ICN🇰🇷 CX HKG🇭🇰 Air Asia KUL🇲🇾 MU PVG🇨🇳 local carriers PW1100G 5J and PR RP-C9930-RP-C9938 🇵🇭. The CI A321-271N has a maintenance issue with the PW1100G while CX A321-251N doesn't isn't affected by the PW1100G issue

    • @Roboseal2
      @Roboseal2 Рік тому +1

      The old engines are having the problems.

  • @TotRuAv0015
    @TotRuAv0015 Рік тому +10

    LEAP 1A is more iconic in my opinion

  • @DomoniqueMusiclover
    @DomoniqueMusiclover Рік тому

    Beautiful

  • @marcusianaviation9372
    @marcusianaviation9372 2 роки тому +35

    CFM > PW here

    • @HunterHearstHelmsley
      @HunterHearstHelmsley  2 роки тому +17

      The PW1100G introduces many new technologies, but also has many problems.
      The LEAP is relatively more stable.

    • @ohenry4834
      @ohenry4834 2 роки тому +1

      @@HunterHearstHelmsley used to but after updates it was all sorted out already...

    • @vedapriyaravi7503
      @vedapriyaravi7503 Рік тому +1

      P&W

    • @aliancemd
      @aliancemd 10 місяців тому +1

      Based on what? Who makes more noise?
      PW is less noisy while giving ~20% more beans(kN) of continuous max thrust, at a lower fuel consumption.

    • @tortozza
      @tortozza 9 місяців тому

      @@aliancemd PW is not noticeably quieter, we are talking about fractions of a decibel here

  • @LongQuanVu-hu3gm
    @LongQuanVu-hu3gm 12 днів тому

    A321LR only have 2 wing exit

  • @CarlosGamesCG5173
    @CarlosGamesCG5173 2 місяці тому

    0:53 PW1000G? Look carefully

    • @HunterHearstHelmsley
      @HunterHearstHelmsley  2 місяці тому

      0:53 it's LEAP-1A (Cathay Pacific A321neo), not PW1100G (China Airlines A321neo).

    • @CarlosGamesCG5173
      @CarlosGamesCG5173 2 місяці тому

      Look at the nozzle of both engines, it is so small
      0:53 and 1:32

  • @edwardzen7340
    @edwardzen7340 2 роки тому +3

    Two different exit configs (wow)

    • @HunterHearstHelmsley
      @HunterHearstHelmsley  2 роки тому +4

      As far as I know, the A320neo series has many configurations for exit.

  • @LongQuanVu-hu3gm
    @LongQuanVu-hu3gm 12 днів тому

    PW1100g has more thrust

  • @Nathan319_
    @Nathan319_ Рік тому +2

    LEAP 1A is better

    • @ramyfares9099
      @ramyfares9099 10 місяців тому

      In terms of reliability yes however in terms of fuel efficiency, the PW1000G is better, especially when considering A321XLRs powered by PW1133G, for a long haul flight.

    • @MS-gu9fy
      @MS-gu9fy 7 місяців тому

      @@ramyfares9099 Regarding fuel efficiency and economics do you have a source where I can find (non-manufacturer) data on that? Thank you! Or how do you know PW is better.