@@mortalclown3812maybe a sight problem on the commenter’s part. Some visually impaired people write in all caps letters because that’s their way to cope and doesn’t equal screaming.
I TOTALLY AGREE WHIT YOU SHE IS AN VILE, EVIL, VISIUS MONSTER. The tv was a setup it was already broken there was a cover in the floor for the mess. He did'nt look violent at all there
I’m going to respectfully disagree with this Body Language Expert. Sarah Boone is playing with everyone in this courtroom. She knows what to do and say to get people to feel sorry for her. Sarah is a Malignant Narcissist!
@@straycats6 I know a few body language experts who are VERY great. One of them is working as a "magician" because he is that great that it outgrows "body language analysis" and looks way more like actual "mind reading". But in every show he makes sure that his audience knows that is a mix from talent and a very long time of studying human behavior, thinking patterns, body language, mimic and so on and that NOTHING he does is in any shape or form "magic" or whatever supernatural stuff even though it definitely seems like that quite often. But I agree.. this one is just a proof that one can study, train, learn and practice a long time and still just be bad at the job. Sarah does not at all give me the impression that she ever was really a victim of dv but a very manipulative person that 1. has convinced herself that she is a victim and 2. acts how ever she thinks she has to to make others believe her She does that not even because she wanted to walk out there a free woman. She does it because she is that kind of person who would never in a million years admit that SHE did anything wrong/was at fault not to others and not to herself. Sarah Boone can accept to be seen as a hero or a victim and nothing else, so she will twist and turn every statement to fit one of those two patterns (or more: like she THINKS what and how to say something or to act to be perceived as she intends)
that one juror that was a victim of DV will see she is full of it i hope. no real victim would taunt their abuser like that and think it will help him to act better. that was infuriating!!!
If she walks, its 100% injustice.....the video convicts her. She wasnt in danger, she was taunting him while zipped up in a suitcase. Hearing this crap is surreal.
I hate pseudo science. I don't believe in experts. It's all hype. They are only guessing, using math. Probability. Overpaid, individuals holding multiple degrees.
She’s a figment of her own imagination. There’s something pretty pathological about a a person who is smoke and mirrors who claims to be a body language and liar specialist.. creepy. Weird world that allows people like her to self promote themselves into experts . Creep creepy creepy just like sarah boo e .
I am a survivor of severe domestic violence and I would be very good on this journey because I would not have a lot of sympathy because she was also charged with domestic violence. I also know my mindset when I was being beat or even in the hospital recovering from my injuries . I often thought about ending my life but I never once thought about killing my abuser does not make sense to me is why she picked a time when he was vulnerable to suddenly have battered wife syndrome. If at any time I would have lashed out and hurt my partner would have been doing a domestic violence incident when he was attacking me, not waiting until he was locked up in a suitcase where he could not defend himself. If she was that afraid of him and left him in the suitcase, why did she not call the police? I would find her guilty because it was domestic violence on both sides but she's the one that ended up killing her partner
if she were really afraid that he was going to retaliate she would have never gone to sleep. She must have been pretty sure he was either dead or not able to get out of the suitcase, she killed him and tortured him
I am not pro Sarah, yet I understand why she didn't call the cops. After these injury's, I understand why she didn't unzip the case. She did kill him, and prison will do her some good, and I hope the jury does the just thing.
The prosecution is doing a TERRIBLE job. Why didn’t they question Sarah about her history of abusing men? Or how she was “forced” to hit Jorge with a bat in order to “keep him from escaping and harming her,” but then went up stairs to sleep without any worry about him getting out or concern about her safety if he did? Why didn’t they ask the last witness if Sarah ever appeared drunk? Or stumbling? Could she have caused the bruises to herself? Why didn’t they question Sarah’s ex. Better about the mutual combat he witnessed between her and Jorge? Or what she said when she called him that night? Why he deleted the call from his log? There are a million other holes they could have poked in this defense. If Sarah gets off, it will be all of the prosecution’s fault. Edit: I apologize for doubting them 😂. The rebuttal was what I had expected to see all along
@@britgirl1152 lol, I’m just asking what everyone should be asking- but half of me understands why this is happening. The prosecutors are all so overworked. While Sarah has obsessed over a way to get out of this for 4 years straight, they’ve been plowing through case after case after case with break. You get burned out. This is why our Judicial system needs much better funding and many more qualified and experienced prosecution teams. They should have been able to focus solely on her case for the last 4 months at least, preparing for trial. But they have been bogged down with so many other responsibilities that they are seemingly fumbling this one BAD. We have one last chance tomorrow with their rebuttal, but if they don’t start hammering holes in her lies, this diabolical woman is going to walk free… It’s like watching Gypsy Rose get handed a horribly unjust deal that she also never deserved just because she was the last one alive to tell the story, the prosecutor stopped the police from investigating only weeks after her arrest, (and most importantly) because her unscrupulous attorney became her entertainment manager (still is) and realized he could make a small fortune spinning her case into something it was not. He sold her fake story to media and now half of the public today still doesn’t understand the FACTS of what she did and why. They still believe the fictionalized defense-version’s story, and now she’s made millions of dollars off these lies because no one has taken 30 minutes to look at the court records, text messages, and Gypsy’s own testimony. They just watch the dramatized TV version filled with BS and believe it all. 🤦🏽♀️ It is stomach churching to watch such travesties of justice 😢
And even if they get a conviction, it is not the same, just getting over the line, than in absolutely destroying her 6 ways from Sunday! You want all of the ugliness of her exposed to the bright light of the spotlight in shocking detail. • Sarah's vitriol, historically • Her false allegations • Her aggression, both physical violence, and in sneaky manipulations, • Her refusal to ever accept any accountability • her history of flirting and hitting on other guys at the pub ( and elsewhere) both in front of Jorge... aswell as behind his back.. • how she thought she was "cute" , when she was lit up & loaded, playing games and causing trouble. • and on and on and on... That will... • Justify a heavier sentence • galvanise against appeals
@@chilltartsI hear what you’re saying, but she’s just outsmarting the prosecution by acting more normal than she was for the past 5 years. Overworked is NO excuse. They understand this case inside and out, this is on them. But just maybe the jury will pull their chestnuts from the fire. Even a mistrial would allow for new prosecutors. But please, God, not a Not Guilty verdict.
The skuttle says that Susan Constitine is the person the judge THREW out of the courtroom on Friday because of her not having control of her cell phone.
Owens is a creep, dramatic and ineffective. Sarah was the aggressor who took a broken man and beat controlled and abused him til he finally died at her hand. Life in prison for sarah
If you’ve ever been abused by your spouse, and you watch that video yesterday of George on the steps while Sarah is video recording him, you will nod. Seriously, if you’ve lived it, you will get that video. It’s very telling.
The breaking of the TV seemed like the TV was broken and he thought it would be fun to bust it up. She wasn't fearing him while taking the video, no screaming, crying, or begging him to stop. Also, the only thing I got from the video is that he seems to have no strength and was winded with every swing. I don't think you can call her a DV survivor, she seems more like she has learned what to say to make her seem like a survivor. They both seem toxic but how do we know he didn't choke her to get her off of him. She was abusive before meeting him.
sarah is medicated ,,, susan C is pretty narrow minded and hope she apologieses to his family, I unsubscribed from a youtube channel this women is a guest on as she is clearly biased and unprofessional
Omg I know what you're talking about! Its STS isn't it??? I love Joel and his wife and usual guests every time they have this idiot on i cringe so hard! She's so full of it and she acts like she's smarter than everyone!!! I am about to unsubscribe as well!
Sarah is as the abuser. The fact that you, as a reasonably intelligent human being, see’s Sarah as a victim is dead wrong. I have been in an abusive relationship, and I know that a real abuser’s main concern is to always be in control. There is no part of that relationship where Jorge had any control. Sarah had no problem attacking him both verbally and physically. Trust me, I never laid a hand on my abusive ex. I never called him names, destroyed his property, or told him what to do because I knew, that if I did, there would be hell to pay. Sarah Boone is an abuser and a murderer. If there is any justice for Jorge, she will be found guilty and be put away for a very long time!!!!!!!
The prosecution cannot go hard on her during testimony. They can turn off the jury. They will hit her when it counts during closing arguments. The burden was on the defense team to prove she has BWS. Sarah’s own words and actions will sink her. She didn’t call 911 while she was hitting him with the bat to keep him trapped inside the suitcase. In fact she was so confident that he was slowly dying that she left the room and fell asleep. Ridiculous.
@@Leeny017the prosecution may have believed the DV survivor would see how different their situation was to Sarah’s and ultimately not believe her story
I bet that is a mistake the defense made. They thought it was smart not to strike this juror and that she would side with poor Sarah.. I had hope all along that a DV survivor would be the first person to realize WHO the abuser was in this relationship and that the real victim is not in the courtroom but dead.
Once he was in the case if she was frightened why not call the police not laugh and chat with ex and go to sleep when he has been begging for help.She knew what she was doing
I AM a DV victim. I won't call myself a surivor because I managed to traverse my way through it. SB is not, from all the interviews I have seen, to be someone who is overly demonstrative while talking about things that may be distressing. Yesterday, she did a sudden, rather over the top, arms flayling around thing that surprised me and came across to me as an act. I am sure they were codependants i, their alcohol abuse an did not show either in a good light. She saw her ex husband a lot given he lived just down the road and they shared custody of their son. She rang her ex for some reason before ringing 911. And we can only assume Jorje had remained in the suitcase mostly up until the time she rang 911 and said she had been performing CPR. CPR is actually quite hard work, if you have ever performed it or been close. It has to be done with some force. She just counted 1-10, with no sound of exertion. And again (with notable sounds or irritation, - not distress). She lost ot one tear. Jorje was clearly a man with his own issues. That does not mean it is okay to suffocate him and taunt him through his extended and traumatic death.
Yeah. Before that I thought she's a killer and deserves lots of time but they were both super toxic. Now I think she was the abuser. He occasionally hit back but mostly I bet she also got injured through drunken accidents. Definitely no battered spouse. My brother in law is disabled now, my battered sister still barely dares to dissobay him or say anything unfriendly to him ever. Sarah taunted Jorge out him down at every opportunity set him up to be arrested
I am rewatching her testimony and Sarah's stories (ALL OF THEM) do not make any sense on any of the instances of abuse she claimed. She is just a plain LIAR and only deserves life in prison without parole - what she did to that poor man is horrible. Sarah Boone murdered Jorge Torres and deserved to be charged with First Degree Murder, because I believe she planned it. This body expert ought to retire - did she see the constant blinking (LIAR).
My thoughts as well.. That looked almost like she WANTED to imply that those jurors discussed the case when they were not supposed to. I sure hope that people will take this just as serious as her claim that Sarah was an abuse victim instead of a dangerous, abusive narcissist.
This lady is full of it the jurors weren't discussing anything during testimony I know people who were actually in the courtroom and didn't see any of that also the Judge, prosecution, and defense would have also noticed and said something this lady giving false information is ridiculous she's a joke
😂😂😂Fox has been FOXED by the Jurors. Ladies how much were you paid by the defense? If not you just sound stupid you couldn't read the room..😂😂 Guilty as hell!!
I don't need to. If Sarah recorded THOSE videos because she thought she can use them to set him up (I firmly believe that was her intention)... then I don't need to see his videos to already imagine that he had it even worse than the state was able to prove and that was a LOT already. By filming her humiliating him Sarah did ONE nice thing for Jorge: She created the evidence that helped to put her away fur killing him.
So if juror number 1 and 2 were talking then they should be removed and alternates should be put in their place. You are not supposed to talk during the trial. You have uncovered a very large jury nono. Replace them before they go to the jury room.
technically you are right. But I don't believe a single word this "expert" says.. Not her "professional" opinion about Sarah being a victim (she obviously fell for Sarah's act to play a victim on TV). And so I don't believe her that the jurors would violate their instructions at all, let alone RIGHT there in the court room for everyone to see. If that was true, Owens would have already jumped in front of the judge and would have demanded a mistrial or to replace them.
@@Fraukie_H I do agree with you about Owens, and I do not believe that woman either, I am a survivor of DV and my Ex's personality was just like Sarah's on the verbal part.
If one is into hand to hand combat in a dv situation and a weapon is used in a life or death moment, dv is an excellent defense. Jorge was not close to harming SB, she had 11 hours to call le
Chitter Chatter ..so wish our Gerrie Nel who prosecuted Oscar Pistorius cud have x-examined her ..she would have been nailed speechless within seconds ..i just do not buy that Forensic Pschycologist extreme pity for Sarah ..come on she abused Jorge as much as he did her ..she had all the time to flee when he was zipped up ..2nd degree murder period. Besides how on earth could she speak any sense to him zipped up ..she was blind drunk ..i do not believe there was any conversation between them she orchestrated that case ..she challanged him to fit in it abd zipped him up to die ..she knew he died before going to bed as there was nothing to fear ..put her away ...for life ..they were both useless drunks ..but murder is not a solution
Sarah Boone might I've gotten hit by George, but he was a battered spouse as well So she ain't completely innocent on that and she darn sure isn't an innocent on the fact that she murdered him she is a murderer she murdered him he might have hit her but he never murdered her I do not think she should be able to use that excuse She could have, should have left him but deliberately did not she just stayed there in an abusive relationship I think people would be a little bit more understanding if she would have tried to leave him and he would have pursued her and tried to force her to go back with him and she killed him in self-defense
I agree that she is a DV victim, so was Jorge. I find it odd that she couldn't remember making the video but clearly remembers the time between the videos🤔. In the second video Jorge is again begging to be let out. The videos of Jorge did not show her in a good light. She admitted she lied to police. ???
She was still a SB fan beyond reasonable doubt, saying the videos were ineffective old information, according to the video on Surviving The Survivor last night.
Day 2 interrogation video combined with her on the stand changing her story and admitting to the crime knowingly leaving him and she admitted to hitting him with a ball bat to keep him from getting out that’s a wrap. Why her lawyer allowed her to say that is beyond me if she was representing herself I could understand but how a defense lawyer allowed her to say she hit him with a ball bat to prevent him from getting out is crazy specially considering the fact that she told the interrogation detectives they was good and she didn’t touch him and she just forgot he was there. So they know she lied they heard her admit to everything and more by including the ball bat she’s done.
Just the fact there is a woman on the juror who was battered, case closed... Sarah walks free. Why would the state leave her on the jury. Jorge will not get justice.
The prosecution is doing a horrible job. Why they would have allowed that woman on the jury doesn’t make sense. Why they didn’t do a better job on cross yesterday, makes no sense. Why they did such a poor job questioning her ex Brian, makes no sense. If she gets off it will be all their fault, and society will be the one to pay the price. It will show other psychopaths that as along as they are the only one left to tell the story, they can make themselves any type of victim they want. It’s like the Gypsy Rose plea deal all over again 😡
Why was my reply deleted, YT? lol. What I said was, “The prosecution is doing a horrible job. It doesn’t make sense why they would have allowed that woman on the jury who has a history of DV. It doesn’t make sense why they did such a poor job on cross yesterday. There was a million places they could have poked holes! “For example, how was she so scared that she ‘had’ to beat him with a bat to prevent his escape, but less then 30 minutes later fell asleep ‘knowing he could get out’ and catch her unaware? “Something isn’t adding up. Why was the final 22 sec video so eerily quiet? Jorge stopped pleading for release, and she admitted to throwing him around in the suitcase and hitting him with a bat. How did she know he was breathing then? Or did she suspect he wasn’t and that’s why she started calling her ex, Brian? “Over all, her story makes no sense and they have done a poor job of presenting the evidence that she is lying about being in fear. They could have showed her history of violence and alcohol abuse through questioning Brian! I am hoping this a strategy, because if she gets off it will be all their fault and society will be the one to pay the price. It will show other psychopaths that as along as they are the only one left to tell the story, they can make up anything and no one can refute them. They can become any type of victim they want. It’s like watching Gypsy Rose’s prosecution offer her that horribly unjust plea deal all over again! 🤦🏽♀️”
I am concerned that there are so many women on this jury. No offence, but in a trial like this, it needs to be balanced. Especially in a case like this where the DV is separated from the murder. Anything less than 30 years is gross injustice.
“It was a split second decision” says Boone. How utterly absurd that someone you zipped up in suitcase and is begging for air is life or death situation for you. She sure appeared cold during her testimony. The case is more like a battered husband syndrome as the videos show.
SARAH BOONE WAS THE ATTACKER, NOT THE VICTIM
Shrieking in all caps = perhaps
fasten those hinges.
@@mortalclown3812maybe a sight problem on the commenter’s part. Some visually impaired people write in all caps letters because that’s their way to cope and doesn’t equal screaming.
@@mortalclown3812oh it’s the caps police! Who cares if they use caps? 🙄
Sarah Boone was definitely the aggressor
I TOTALLY AGREE WHIT YOU SHE IS AN VILE, EVIL, VISIUS MONSTER. The tv was a setup it was already broken there was a cover in the floor for the mess. He did'nt look violent at all there
I’m going to respectfully disagree with this Body Language Expert. Sarah Boone is playing with everyone in this courtroom. She knows what to do and say to get people to feel sorry for her. Sarah is a Malignant Narcissist!
Acting. Scripted. Costumed. Well-executed.
I agree, I put no faith in these language experts
Agree 100%
I don’t think she herself is all that convincing.
@@straycats6
I know a few body language experts who are VERY great.
One of them is working as a "magician" because he is that great that it outgrows "body language analysis" and looks way more like actual "mind reading".
But in every show he makes sure that his audience knows that is a mix from talent and a very long time of studying human behavior, thinking patterns, body language, mimic and so on and that NOTHING he does is in any shape or form "magic" or whatever supernatural stuff even though it definitely seems like that quite often.
But I agree.. this one is just a proof that one can study, train, learn and practice a long time and still just be bad at the job.
Sarah does not at all give me the impression that she ever was really a victim of dv but a very manipulative person that
1. has convinced herself that she is a victim
and
2. acts how ever she thinks she has to to make others believe her
She does that not even because she wanted to walk out there a free woman.
She does it because she is that kind of person who would never in a million years admit that SHE did anything wrong/was at fault not to others and not to herself.
Sarah Boone can accept to be seen as a hero or a victim and nothing else, so she will twist and turn every statement to fit one of those two patterns (or more: like she THINKS what and how to say something or to act to be perceived as she intends)
that one juror that was a victim of DV will see she is full of it i hope. no real victim would taunt their abuser like that and think it will help him to act better. that was infuriating!!!
I’m sure that juror identified with jorge.
If she walks, its 100% injustice.....the video convicts her. She wasnt in danger, she was taunting him while zipped up in a suitcase. Hearing this crap is surreal.
So agree with you.
Didn’t Casey Anthony walk free
. Stay Tuned..I think she gone 15 to 25 ..not Life..
She finally snapped
@@mamabear1324 she was wasted.....
I pray the jury isn’t stupid like Casey Anthony’s jury
It’s on video, he’s dead-she left him there. Did he abuse her…yeah. No excuse
That's what my Sister and I are worried about.😢
Side note cassey Anthony's dad did it
@@mamabear1324say's Casey 😂😂😂😂
This is what I am worried about.
I think they have been abusing each other due to alcoholism
This “expert” needs to find a new career
This woman is NOT an expert
This expert isn’t an expert in anything human , behavior, emotion, body language.. nothing . If anything she’s an expert on herself 🙄
She’s probably part of the “believe all women” cult.
I can’t stand this “body language specialist” her opinions are crazy
I hate pseudo science. I don't believe in experts. It's all hype. They are only guessing, using math. Probability. Overpaid, individuals holding multiple degrees.
She’s a figment of her own imagination.
There’s something pretty pathological about a a person who is smoke and mirrors who claims to be a body language and liar specialist.. creepy. Weird world that allows people like her to self promote themselves into experts . Creep creepy creepy just like sarah boo e .
I agree with your opinion of this woman specialist in body language.
@steelhurricane4041 not at all.
She's got a good rapport because this was that Narcissist's last chance. She's playing people in the room
This woman was NOT ABUSED! BY HIM.
I am a survivor of severe domestic violence and I would be very good on this journey because I would not have a lot of sympathy because she was also charged with domestic violence. I also know my mindset when I was being beat or even in the hospital recovering from my injuries . I often thought about ending my life but I never once thought about killing my abuser does not make sense to me is why she picked a time when he was vulnerable to suddenly have battered wife syndrome. If at any time I would have lashed out and hurt my partner would have been doing a domestic violence incident when he was attacking me, not waiting until he was locked up in a suitcase where he could not defend himself. If she was that afraid of him and left him in the suitcase, why did she not call the police? I would find her guilty because it was domestic violence on both sides but she's the one that ended up killing her partner
So sorry you’ve been through such pain. I hope you’re doing well.
if she were really afraid that he was going to retaliate she would have never gone to sleep. She must have been pretty sure he was either dead or not able to get out of the suitcase, she killed him and tortured him
I am not pro Sarah, yet I understand why she didn't call the cops. After these injury's, I understand why she didn't unzip the case. She did kill him, and prison will do her some good, and I hope the jury does the just thing.
@@kimgomez8099she wasn’t afraid of him ! She went to bed .. and slept well
@@Jam420Jam this opportunity comes once in lifetime yo.
The prosecution is doing a TERRIBLE job. Why didn’t they question Sarah about her history of abusing men? Or how she was “forced” to hit Jorge with a bat in order to “keep him from escaping and harming her,” but then went up stairs to sleep without any worry about him getting out or concern about her safety if he did? Why didn’t they ask the last witness if Sarah ever appeared drunk? Or stumbling? Could she have caused the bruises to herself? Why didn’t they question Sarah’s ex. Better about the mutual combat he witnessed between her and Jorge? Or what she said when she called him that night? Why he deleted the call from his log? There are a million other holes they could have poked in this defense. If Sarah gets off, it will be all of the prosecution’s fault.
Edit: I apologize for doubting them 😂. The rebuttal was what I had expected to see all along
Totally agree. Makes me mad to think she might get off. I wish the jury could see and hear the true Sarah we’ve seen for 4 years
All good points/questions. Pity you weren’t part of the prosecution team. 😊
@@britgirl1152 lol, I’m just asking what everyone should be asking- but half of me understands why this is happening. The prosecutors are all so overworked. While Sarah has obsessed over a way to get out of this for 4 years straight, they’ve been plowing through case after case after case with break. You get burned out. This is why our Judicial system needs much better funding and many more qualified and experienced prosecution teams. They should have been able to focus solely on her case for the last 4 months at least, preparing for trial. But they have been bogged down with so many other responsibilities that they are seemingly fumbling this one BAD. We have one last chance tomorrow with their rebuttal, but if they don’t start hammering holes in her lies, this diabolical woman is going to walk free…
It’s like watching Gypsy Rose get handed a horribly unjust deal that she also never deserved just because she was the last one alive to tell the story, the prosecutor stopped the police from investigating only weeks after her arrest, (and most importantly) because her unscrupulous attorney became her entertainment manager (still is) and realized he could make a small fortune spinning her case into something it was not. He sold her fake story to media and now half of the public today still doesn’t understand the FACTS of what she did and why. They still believe the fictionalized defense-version’s story, and now she’s made millions of dollars off these lies because no one has taken 30 minutes to look at the court records, text messages, and Gypsy’s own testimony. They just watch the dramatized TV version filled with BS and believe it all. 🤦🏽♀️
It is stomach churching to watch such travesties of justice 😢
And even if they get a conviction, it is not the same, just getting over the line, than in absolutely destroying her 6 ways from Sunday!
You want all of the ugliness of her exposed to the bright light of the spotlight in shocking detail.
• Sarah's vitriol, historically
• Her false allegations
• Her aggression, both physical violence, and in sneaky manipulations,
• Her refusal to ever accept any accountability
• her history of flirting and hitting on other guys at the pub ( and elsewhere) both in front of Jorge... aswell as behind his back..
• how she thought she was "cute" , when she was lit up & loaded, playing games and causing trouble.
• and on and on and on...
That will...
• Justify a heavier sentence
• galvanise against appeals
@@chilltartsI hear what you’re saying, but she’s just outsmarting the prosecution by acting more normal than she was for the past 5 years. Overworked is NO excuse. They understand this case inside and out, this is on them. But just maybe the jury will pull their chestnuts from the fire. Even a mistrial would allow for new prosecutors. But please, God, not a Not Guilty verdict.
This Susan lady was laughed outta the Law scene lol. Her “hot takes” on SB where HORRENDOUS
Yeah, but she won’t put that on her CV and self description . I actually think she’s a narcissist.😂😂
She didn't do CPR. She tried and was disgusted that he gurgled the first time on the 911 call.
I'm in Healthcare.... I'm still outta breath from doing CPR last week.... she wasn't doing CPR 😂😂😂😂😂
No one cares about a body language “expert”. Seriously. Go away.
If she felt threatened by him why didn't she leave to get help from police while he was in the suitcase? She was the abuser. 😮
Exactly 💯
Not a good look to constantly be smiling and joking while you’re on trial for murder.
BS! Sarah is NOT a victim
The skuttle says that Susan Constitine is the person the judge THREW out of the courtroom on Friday because of her not having control of her cell phone.
Oh that's interesting
Quack, quack, quack
🦆🦆🦆🥱
Owens is a creep, dramatic and ineffective. Sarah was the aggressor who took a broken man and beat controlled and abused him til he finally died at her hand. Life in prison for sarah
Owens has gotten in trouble for having an affair with a client’s wife. I believe one of the girls is his daughter
I can tell by the body language of the expert that she doesn't know what she is talking about
If you’ve ever been abused by your spouse, and you watch that video yesterday of George on the steps while Sarah is video recording him, you will nod. Seriously, if you’ve lived it, you will get that video. It’s very telling.
please god stop platforming this BS body language crap
I'm on board with you.
Total shame , agree. I turn the channel on this crap.
Let's wait for the rebuttal.
I Tried to tell people. I had seen the videos on line.... few people took me seriously 😐
The breaking of the TV seemed like the TV was broken and he thought it would be fun to bust it up. She wasn't fearing him while taking the video, no screaming, crying, or begging him to stop. Also, the only thing I got from the video is that he seems to have no strength and was winded with every swing. I don't think you can call her a DV survivor, she seems more like she has learned what to say to make her seem like a survivor. They both seem toxic but how do we know he didn't choke her to get her off of him. She was abusive before meeting him.
She set that up...we weren't let in on the actual context of that video
Turn your phone off nezt time you're in court Susan.
She’s a vile, abusive murderer! She’s dangerous!
That prosecutor is sooo disappointing. He missed so many opportunities to nail her with the right questions
Do you feel that way after day 5? Those videos were a slam dunk. Made Boone look controlling and like the aggressor.
💯 I always had faith in the State.
We don't have the experience or education they have. I don't know why people believe they know more.@@TriToms-c8m
sarah is medicated ,,, susan C is pretty narrow minded and hope she apologieses to his family, I unsubscribed from a youtube channel this women is a guest on as she is clearly biased and unprofessional
Omg I know what you're talking about! Its STS isn't it??? I love Joel and his wife and usual guests every time they have this idiot on i cringe so hard! She's so full of it and she acts like she's smarter than everyone!!! I am about to unsubscribe as well!
Your expert must feel bad after the videos had been shown. It's Sarah who's the aggressor and bullying. Not Jorge
Sarah is as the abuser. The fact that you, as a reasonably intelligent human being, see’s Sarah as a victim is dead wrong. I have been in an abusive relationship, and I know that a real abuser’s main concern is to always be in control. There is no part of that relationship where Jorge had any control. Sarah had no problem attacking him both verbally and physically. Trust me, I never laid a hand on my abusive ex. I never called him names, destroyed his property, or told him what to do because I knew, that if I did, there would be hell to pay. Sarah Boone is an abuser and a murderer. If there is any justice for Jorge, she will be found guilty and be put away for a very long time!!!!!!!
EXACTLY! ITS ALL HER
SHE IS THE ABUSER
I BET MOST OR ALL OF HER BRUISES,CUTS, MARK'S WERE BECAUSE SHE WAS FALL DOWN DRUNK
Biased. She was abusive to him as well and they were both drunks. What she did is cruel and malicious! THAT is the issue.
The prosecution cannot go hard on her during testimony. They can turn off the jury. They will hit her when it counts during closing arguments. The burden was on the defense team to prove she has BWS. Sarah’s own words and actions will sink her. She didn’t call 911 while she was hitting him with the bat to keep him trapped inside the suitcase. In fact she was so confident that he was slowly dying that she left the room and fell asleep. Ridiculous.
I’m glad this lady thing was 1000% WRONG!! Sarah was the aggressor and controller.
Mixing alcohol with these two was a bad idea. Sarah lit a match she had over his head a long time. Rip Jorge.😢💔
She’s an expert? May as well just stop a random person on the street and start asking questions.
Why does she get to have a DV juror? I grew up in a house with DV & when I got jury duty I wasn't allowed to be on a DV trial.
Ive seen that as well, but maybe it was the prosecution who didn't object to a DV victim in this case? I don't know, but it's an interesting question.
@@Leeny017the prosecution may have believed the DV survivor would see how different their situation was to Sarah’s and ultimately not believe her story
Jury of her peers.
Lawyers' choice.
I bet that is a mistake the defense made.
They thought it was smart not to strike this juror and that she would side with poor Sarah..
I had hope all along that a DV survivor would be the first person to realize WHO the abuser was in this relationship and that the real victim is not in the courtroom but dead.
Once he was in the case if she was frightened why not call the police not laugh and chat with ex and go to sleep when he has been begging for help.She knew what she was doing
This specialist body labguage talks a lot but says nothing.
Kinda like Klamala
You mean she says nothing that's correct?
I AM a DV victim. I won't call myself a surivor because I managed to traverse my way through it. SB is not, from all the interviews I have seen, to be someone who is overly demonstrative while talking about things that may be distressing. Yesterday, she did a sudden, rather over the top, arms flayling around thing that surprised me and came across to me as an act. I am sure they were codependants i, their alcohol abuse an did not show either in a good light. She saw her ex husband a lot given he lived just down the road and they shared custody of their son. She rang her ex for some reason before ringing 911. And we can only assume Jorje had remained in the suitcase mostly up until the time she rang 911 and said she had been performing CPR. CPR is actually quite hard work, if you have ever performed it or been close. It has to be done with some force. She just counted 1-10, with no sound of exertion. And again (with notable sounds or irritation, - not distress). She lost ot one tear. Jorje was clearly a man with his own issues. That does not mean it is okay to suffocate him and taunt him through his extended and traumatic death.
It's on video. There is NO excuse for an aquittal.
SB was very cagey while on the stand- choosing her words carefully to make sure she was in the best light possible.
Well yeah I would think everybody would do that that is the point point in your life you want to paint yourself in the best light possible.
They watched the 911 calls and the control she had over him. She was the abuser, not Jorge.
Yeah. Before that I thought she's a killer and deserves lots of time but they were both super toxic. Now I think she was the abuser. He occasionally hit back but mostly I bet she also got injured through drunken accidents. Definitely no battered spouse. My brother in law is disabled now, my battered sister still barely dares to dissobay him or say anything unfriendly to him ever. Sarah taunted Jorge out him down at every opportunity set him up to be arrested
She filmed it , what more proof do you need?
Right and funny there's no sign of Jorge being abusive in those videos.
@@zazzaz6533
He was guilty of DV, too, but this doesn't mean that she shouldn't be convicted of second-degree murder.
@@mortalclown3812 yep.
Dude she legit cut that guy off, fast! I'd be pissed. So unprofessional.
This woman is not being honest and letting her misandry issue come out.
The Prosecution gets their rebuttal tomorrow. They may have saved the "big guns" for tomorrow and for their closing statement.
I am rewatching her testimony and Sarah's stories (ALL OF THEM) do not make any sense on any of the instances of abuse she claimed. She is just a plain LIAR and only deserves life in prison without parole - what she did to that poor man is horrible. Sarah Boone murdered Jorge Torres and deserved to be charged with First Degree Murder, because I believe she planned it. This body expert ought to retire - did she see the constant blinking (LIAR).
A woman og domestic abuse agreed she is guilty
Self-promotion and good contacts beat actual expertise -- every time.
Stop talking about the jurors 😑
My thoughts as well..
That looked almost like she WANTED to imply that those jurors discussed the case when they were not supposed to.
I sure hope that people will take this just as serious as her claim that Sarah was an abuse victim instead of a dangerous, abusive narcissist.
This lady is full of it the jurors weren't discussing anything during testimony I know people who were actually in the courtroom and didn't see any of that also the Judge, prosecution, and defense would have also noticed and said something this lady giving false information is ridiculous she's a joke
She should’ve used the “all puzzled out” defense again
😂😂😂Fox has been FOXED by the Jurors. Ladies how much were you paid by the defense? If not you just sound stupid you couldn't read the room..😂😂 Guilty as hell!!
What about his medical records
I would disagree I feel that The smiling constantly she's overconfident
We weren’t able to see George’s videos of Sarah one sided story
I don't need to.
If Sarah recorded THOSE videos because she thought she can use them to set him up (I firmly believe that was her intention)... then I don't need to see his videos to already imagine that he had it even worse than the state was able to prove and that was a LOT already.
By filming her humiliating him Sarah did ONE nice thing for Jorge:
She created the evidence that helped to put her away fur killing him.
Big no no if you saw 2 jurors talking while looking at Sarah Boone interact with her attorneys!!! May need to be reported.
They could have been a talking about golf
Don’t be ridiculous 😂
@@debbiejames3096 hahaha
So if juror number 1 and 2 were talking then they should be removed and alternates should be put in their place. You are not supposed to talk during the trial. You have uncovered a very large jury nono. Replace them before they go to the jury room.
technically you are right.
But I don't believe a single word this "expert" says..
Not her "professional" opinion about Sarah being a victim (she obviously fell for Sarah's act to play a victim on TV).
And so I don't believe her that the jurors would violate their instructions at all, let alone RIGHT there in the court room for everyone to see.
If that was true, Owens would have already jumped in front of the judge and would have demanded a mistrial or to replace them.
@@Fraukie_H I do agree with you about Owens, and I do not believe that woman either, I am a survivor of DV and my Ex's personality was just like Sarah's on the verbal part.
If one is into hand to hand combat in a dv situation and a weapon is used in a life or death moment, dv is an excellent defense. Jorge was not close to harming SB, she had 11 hours to call le
Chitter Chatter ..so wish our Gerrie Nel who prosecuted Oscar Pistorius cud have x-examined her ..she would have been nailed speechless within seconds ..i just do not buy that Forensic Pschycologist extreme pity for Sarah ..come on she abused Jorge as much as he did her ..she had all the time to flee when he was zipped up ..2nd degree murder period. Besides how on earth could she speak any sense to him zipped up ..she was blind drunk ..i do not believe there was any conversation between them she orchestrated that case ..she challanged him to fit in it abd zipped him up to die ..she knew he died before going to bed as there was nothing to fear ..put her away ...for life ..they were both useless drunks ..but murder is not a solution
This woman, Ms Constantine is just trying to hawk her books…she has no credibility in my opinion. Body Language Expert???😂😂😂
Sarah Boone might I've gotten hit by George, but he was a battered spouse as well
So she ain't completely innocent on that and she darn sure isn't an innocent on the fact that she murdered him she is a murderer she murdered him he might have hit her but he never murdered her
I do not think she should be able to use that excuse
She could have, should have left him but deliberately did not she just stayed there in an abusive relationship
I think people would be a little bit more understanding if she would have tried to leave him and he would have pursued her and tried to force her to go back with him and she killed him in self-defense
She's had 4 years 7 months to get her new story lies😢😢😢
Oh these the so called experts no just no
Well I would have loved to have heard this!
The student neighbors heard BOTH yelling and arguing.
I agree that she is a DV victim, so was Jorge. I find it odd that she couldn't remember making the video but clearly remembers the time between the videos🤔. In the second video Jorge is again begging to be let out.
The videos of Jorge did not show her in a good light. She admitted she lied to police. ???
I wanna know how she feels now after yesterday's videos
She was still a SB fan beyond reasonable doubt, saying the videos were ineffective old information, according to the video on Surviving The Survivor last night.
@@daisyqvq4070 wow crazy lady. Old Information? The worst are only months before his death.
Before he started hitting that tv, he said to Sarah, “ are you going to help me take it out” he wasn’t doing it in anger.
We *ALL* agree. Jorge, indeed, suffered from Battereed Spouse Syndrome. Justice has prevailed!
The “body language expert” was hoping Sarah would go free. 😂
Funny how Sarah couldn't remember much of the incident 24 hours later, yet had perfect recall 4 1/2 years later.
Funny how people think defanants can't be human.
This one isn't, and it's defendant.
She was not a DV victim, she was the aggressor and he defended himself. My opinion!!! and watching what was shown and listening to her.
The easiest case the prosecuting attorney will ever have in his life!
But he was of a victim of her as well
She is guilty now ....
Excellent report!!
Good read.
A different Sarah because shes sober
who was the director of that video ?? I think she is much more devious then originally thought. I think she set him up. Just my opinon.
Day 2 interrogation video combined with her on the stand changing her story and admitting to the crime knowingly leaving him and she admitted to hitting him with a ball bat to keep him from getting out that’s a wrap. Why her lawyer allowed her to say that is beyond me if she was representing herself I could understand but how a defense lawyer allowed her to say she hit him with a ball bat to prevent him from getting out is crazy specially considering the fact that she told the interrogation detectives they was good and she didn’t touch him and she just forgot he was there. So they know she lied they heard her admit to everything and more by including the ball bat she’s done.
Just the fact there is a woman on the juror who was battered, case closed... Sarah walks free. Why would the state leave her on the jury. Jorge will not get justice.
The prosecution is doing a horrible job. Why they would have allowed that woman on the jury doesn’t make sense. Why they didn’t do a better job on cross yesterday, makes no sense. Why they did such a poor job questioning her ex Brian, makes no sense. If she gets off it will be all their fault, and society will be the one to pay the price. It will show other psychopaths that as along as they are the only one left to tell the story, they can make themselves any type of victim they want. It’s like the Gypsy Rose plea deal all over again 😡
Yep. Cannot freaking believe it.
Why was my reply deleted, YT? lol.
What I said was, “The prosecution is doing a horrible job. It doesn’t make sense why they would have allowed that woman on the jury who has a history of DV. It doesn’t make sense why they did such a poor job on cross yesterday. There was a million places they could have poked holes!
“For example, how was she so scared that she ‘had’ to beat him with a bat to prevent his escape, but less then 30 minutes later fell asleep ‘knowing he could get out’ and catch her unaware?
“Something isn’t adding up. Why was the final 22 sec video so eerily quiet? Jorge stopped pleading for release, and she admitted to throwing him around in the suitcase and hitting him with a bat. How did she know he was breathing then? Or did she suspect he wasn’t and that’s why she started calling her ex, Brian?
“Over all, her story makes no sense and they have done a poor job of presenting the evidence that she is lying about being in fear. They could have showed her history of violence and alcohol abuse through questioning Brian! I am hoping this a strategy, because if she gets off it will be all their fault and society will be the one to pay the price. It will show other psychopaths that as along as they are the only one left to tell the story, they can make up anything and no one can refute them. They can become any type of victim they want. It’s like watching Gypsy Rose’s prosecution offer her that horribly unjust plea deal all over again! 🤦🏽♀️”
Don’t be sorry. Garret seriously needed to be interrupted.
Guilty
Yeah her attorneys who’ve been on the case 45 days… the judge said they’d “swooped in” because she’s been through like 8 public attorneys
The body language analyst was impressive.
😂😂😂😂😂 And wrong about everything
I absolutely cant stand Sarah but the defense imo is nailing it prosecution better step up in rebuttal or shes gonna walk😢
I am concerned that there are so many women on this jury. No offence, but in a trial like this, it needs to be balanced. Especially in a case like this where the DV is separated from the murder. Anything less than 30 years is gross injustice.
“It was a split second decision” says Boone. How utterly absurd that someone you zipped up in suitcase and is begging for air is life or death situation for you. She sure appeared cold during her testimony. The case is more like a battered husband syndrome as the videos show.
Oh God help us.
They need that woman who did sign language for the sheriffs office…remember
Wow, interrupt the anchor to tell us to about a conversation with James Owens, and then not really describe it. Bad reporting.
No sound!!!!
Jorge ..failed Boy Toy...at ex husband. Expense..Wino Women..
AVOID their Void..
This "expert" hasn't a clue what day it is, let alone what kind of monster Sarah is. What the h@ll???
It's Florida, they let Casey Anthony go free