Understanding Software Defined Networking with

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @markx6288
    @markx6288 Місяць тому +8

    Software Defined Routing .. yes please!

  • @MarcoRotella
    @MarcoRotella Місяць тому +7

    Yes, part 2 please, really interesting

  • @samsung99monitor6
    @samsung99monitor6 Місяць тому +7

    Part 2 please 😀

  • @techaddressed
    @techaddressed 27 днів тому +1

    Looking forward to part 2.

  • @user-jp6lj5gv7o
    @user-jp6lj5gv7o Місяць тому +7

    10:22 Just noticed that 172.12.*.* is not a private IP range. Only 172.16+.*.* are in the private IP range. Meaning the after 172, the second octet needs to be 16 or greater.

    • @user-lg4le8xr4s
      @user-lg4le8xr4s Місяць тому +1

      172.16.0.0/12. From 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld Місяць тому

      You are right, but in practice this has absolutely no effect as it’s a fully NAT’d network. You can really use anything you want :) great catch though! If theres anything else you’d like to see in a follow up video, just let me know!

  • @whereistheline8964
    @whereistheline8964 Місяць тому +3

    Thank you! Please Provide the Part 2. you explain it very well

  • @28469
    @28469 Місяць тому +4

    give us a tech tip on bench pressing, holy guns

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld Місяць тому +1

      Haha appreciate it man. Have a cpl bench pressing videos on my channel under shorts actually 😅

    • @28469
      @28469 Місяць тому +1

      @@mitcHELLOworld 335 holy crap

    • @45Drives
      @45Drives  Місяць тому

      We'll commence internal talks on this immediately! 😅💪

  • @neoandlifestyle2514
    @neoandlifestyle2514 Місяць тому +2

    Plz part 2 🎉

  • @demanuDJ
    @demanuDJ Місяць тому +2

    I want to know a little more about OVS

  • @user-jp6lj5gv7o
    @user-jp6lj5gv7o Місяць тому +1

    Can you please add the link to "45 home lab" channel in the description? I found it to be: www.youtube.com/@45HomeLab

  • @ZeronicMatrix
    @ZeronicMatrix Місяць тому +1

    Trying to run Proxmox is really janky to be honest, when your using TrueNAS Scale for storage. iSCSI barely works and NFS seems to be the only solution but that is horrible slow, even with 10G and SATA SSDs.

    • @MarcoRotella
      @MarcoRotella Місяць тому +3

      Been running on iscsi for the last four years with no problem whatsoever.. what problems did you face?

    • @toddratson7526
      @toddratson7526 Місяць тому

      I have been running Proxmox VE on 5 servers with TrueNAS Scale for storage for years now and it has been reliable and performant.

    • @floriantthebault521
      @floriantthebault521 Місяць тому

      Ah ah, I have that exact same problem witht he same setup. ISCSI barely works for me too. I can configure it, but only one node of the cluster sees the iscsi lun shares, the others ignores it whatever I do. It's infuriating.

    • @mitcHELLOworld
      @mitcHELLOworld Місяць тому +1

      @@floriantthebault521sounds like you don’t have persistent reservations configured or setup properly.

    • @floriantthebault521
      @floriantthebault521 Місяць тому

      @@mitcHELLOworld Yeah, I found out where was the "problem". It's config and shitty documentation. TrueNas makes you declare your Zvol as extents... and then you had to manually declare those extents as Associated Targets... it was trial and error, but it's truly bad UI design and bad documentation.