@@clefairyfan333not really lol ppl just like all FNAF fans agree that William started killing because of the death of crying child which is not even confirm
Well tbf it is more recent so they're mostly just gonna bring up small things from that time frame plus most people are or at least the main channels soooo
interesting idea but i personally believe that sister location is the first time Michael ever goes into the bunker since he tells William he found it, and it was exactly where he said it would be. to me that means that he never knew where it was before the events of SL
not entirely sure about this but perhaps michael either spoke to william in the saferoom after he was springlocked (if his vocal chords werent severed of course) or he spoke to him just before and he told him what to do in sister location
This is a really good theory and I'm glad you explained how William could and could not have injected the remnant. Also having it be Michael doing it, but then with how Funtime Freddy/Molten act towards Michael, if he did that would the kids be that upset at him, especially if it meant they could go after William still?
Just subscribed. 😀👍 Honestly, you did a better job at explaining Henry’s speech than Matpat and his crew did. Your theory is pretty convincing, but my thing is, if he went to sister location before, wouldn’t Baby recognize him? When Michael says, “I found it, it was right where you said it would be”. He’s using the word “IT”, which is meant to be singular. So it’s possible that he could be referring to the secret entrance to the elevator that leads to the bunker. When Mike mentions, “They were all there. They didn’t recognize me at first but then, they thought I was you”. He could be referring to the funtimes. Given the funtimes have pieces of the OG kids, they would lash out at whoever reminds them of William. Even with the Biddybabs saying, “Someone is inside. Is it the same person?” While I’m not against your theory, it is interesting. I’d love to do a Discord chat with you about FNAF, that is if you’re interested? I won’t be upset if you say no.
I feel like if this theory is to be true he probably didn't encounter baby when he went to the facility for the first time. Baby doesn't get injected with remnant so he would have no reason to cross paths with her. Also what I was getting at was more that the "it" Mike is referring to is the spot the endos are at, not the endos themselves. Since he says "I found it. it was right where you said it would be. They were all there" it seems like the "it" is a place. It definitely could just be the facility, but I think this idea could work as well, and that bidybab line could mean that Michael has been down here before and they've seen him before.
Most of the missing kids are in Happiest Day. but I believe the Golden Freddy mask kid is CC not Cassidy and CC is the one in the endo Cassidy is in the shell, that's why the actual Golden Freddy suit is twitching at the end of UCN. Otherwise I like the theory
this video made me realize michael is still alive after being scooped because the scooper injected him with remnant, and also molten freddy has remnant because hes basically enard
My only problem with molten MCI is that it doesn’t account for the fact that the funtimes unlike the OG 4 have their own distinct individual personalities and act very different compared to the OG 4 in fnaf 1 and 2
The evil AI was stronger and avoided the souls to act by their own will. In The Fourth Closet the Funtime animatronics were capturing kids because the souls thought William was just a cute SpringBonnie that was their friend, therefore, they obeyed his orders.
@@juliabp6057 But in the fourth closet they acted more like the fnaf one animatronics without their memories or their killer. And plus that doesn’t explain their behavior in the games as they are both fully conscious, very intelligent and have a hatred for Willian except for baby.
I think that Michael being the one that puts the souls into the funtimes does circumvent the main issue with the funtimes because it's believed that the funtimes were always built with the MCI victims inside, but if instead, the funtimes already existed and Michael inserted the MCI inside them, that immediately helps tremendously with the issue of the timeline. There is one problem this has. Because there is only one kitten that dies in Candy Cadet's story, not 5. So "Michael" in this case wouldn't be so much the person that puts together the 5 MCI victims inside the funtimes, but rather 1 victim? It's a weird analogy. I think instead that the person that puts the dead kitten together is instead the father of the crying child after he tragically lost his youngest son to the bite of Freddy. Yeah, I think that William is this story's good person. Because I believe that he genuinely started with good intentions in trying to bring his youngest back to life. It gets even weirder when you realise that the soon releasing movie implies William kidnapped his own son, Michael's younger brother. Because what if that's not just "bringing them inside and keeping them in a shoebox" but actually bringing them in his household like he (supposedly at least, according to the books) does with the other children?
This is honestly similar to what I believe I simply believe Michael worked at the FNaF 1 location, made sure the animatronics are active, William told him what he'll do and what Michael has to do if he doesn't make it out of there After William didn't make it out, Michael took the endos and melted them into remnant, put it in the scooper and worked in the facility He then got to the scooper, trying to process what tf Ennard was talking about, and before he knew it, the scooper was activated Michael didn't know that at the time and BAM, Michael was a skin suit that stayed alive with the help of the remnant and Elizabeth's motivational quote Elizabeth did seem to be a good guy, well, at least to herself, and then moments later MCI kicked her ass out of Ennard Mike came to a self-reflection like Logan Paul and he tried to picture himself as a hero by putting Elizabeth back together and totally freeing her He also realized how the remnant was alive and had the consciousness of the children that thought he was William Michael then finally came to a realization that smt is wrong with him because he's still alive, and he didn't know what tf was happening at first Suddenly he realized it's the immortality and blah blah blah, the rest of the story
I'm a toy into funtime believer but the henry thing was new. He wasnt there for fnaf 2 (they had to contact the original owners which would give will a chance to swoop in). Im thinking he walked in on the empty shells on the Withereds before sealing up springtrap and just assumed their endos were used for the funtimes. Basically molten mci is canon but it didn't exactly happen
Even if. Funtimes were killing machines, when rented they could kill any kid in places while 1 on 1 They don't have to be MCI'85 kids And Scooper who is a remnant infuzer could get and give back a lot of other kid's remnant.
@@ImpulseEvan37 Can the children control all of the individual funtimes (Outside Baby and the non-canon ones), or are they out of their control and they're just free roaming?
Are the fun times endos made of the same endos as the ogs or is he just putting some of it in there? Because if micheal didn't bulid them how did the endos get in there if william is dead and he died after he bulit the funtimes? Also is micheal finding melted metal, the fnaf 1 endos, or new parts made of the melted metal? And why does he decide to put it in the funtimes? How could william have melted the childern posessed metal but then be chased by the kids that are supposed to be trapped in the endoskeletons? And he cant do it after because he was trapped in the safe room
Honestly this is a decent idea but as IDs Fantasy said, the 3 stories don't tell the exact same story. 1 kitten gets eaten and saved, the 5 keys are said to save 5 other things, etc and as she said, the stories may repersent Charlie, Henry and Michael all working to achievethe same goal. I agree with Molton MCI, but what i think is more likely that Ennard went to the location and used the animatronics to fuel him over the next 30 years and to keep his body together after discarding Baby. I think this because: 1. If the remnant was put in the funtimes by Michael with the scooper then their likely wouldn't be any remnant for Michael to absorb. And 2. While Henry went to the saferoom, he would've seen the remains of the animatronics outside the saferoom but since he specifically says he doesn't know how they got into the Funtimes then they must of been taken before William was discovered. What are your thoughts?
The Snake doesn't kill only one kitten. It only kills one on the first night, and five more nights go by and the boy feels more guilty as they pass. I severely doubt only one died, especially since... You know, its a snake. It wouldn't be done for 5 whole days. It definitely ate all the cats. And they don't get saved. And the stories DO all have to do with five things becoming one, they just show all of them differently, which i talked about in the video. If Molten Freddy has remnant and is the funtimes and the funtimes in the fourth closet have remnant which is the missing kids spirits, It makes no sense that the funtimes wouldn't in the games but Molten Freddy would. By the logic of there being no remnant for Michael to absorb, then there would be no remnant left in the fourth closet either. Each animatronics needs a small amount of remnant, they dont need the entire quantity of an endoskeleton per animatronic. 5 endoskeletons melted together wouldn't be completely gone after some of it is put into 3 animatronics. Also I explained that last point in the video. William placed all the endoskeletons in one place for Michael to find, hence the endoskeletons not being on the ground with the remains of the animatronics despite endoskeletons appearing in the minigames regardless.
Somone watched Dawko's "The ending cutscene really mean?" He bring the option of Mike, after S.L, go to dismantle the animatronics in the minigames, but became springtrap. I think mike wasnt 100% in his right mind, that there was "far-remote mind-control conection" ("you wont die") Ennard/Elizabeth/william might Forced/convinced him to hide in the SpringSuit when he Panicked from the "stitchwraith's victim looking ghosts", to complite some process of control, or to simply trick mike and trap him there.
William Afton stuffed the kids' corpses into the animatronics? What happened to their skeletons since they were stuffed into the Funtime animatronics and those went onto become Molten Freddy? What even is remnant and how do you even extract the kids' souls to make it and inject it? Are the missing kids' corpses just fused to Molten like William Afton's corpse is with Burnttrap?
So way later after the stuffing lids into suits he realizes they are posessed so he goes and breaks the robots apart and then somehow the endoskeletons of the robots which have the kids souls all get melted down into one and he uses that metal to make the fun times endoskeletons and it's used in enard. Or I guess Micheal did the melting because William died I'm not really sure how he got the endos in the fun times if he died and then was locked in the safe room?
Another idea I had is: What if it's Henry who put the remnant into the funtimes? What if the stories Candy Cadet told are meant to be in reference to Henry?
This almost makes me think of the secret ending being canon I KNOW the scooping ending is canon I know I know but this idea makes me think of the secret ending
The Candy Cadet story of the woman and the keys doesn’t relate to Molten MCI, it relates to Charlie trying to release the souls of the kids.Charlie can release 1 children but when she tries to release them all she stuck them in the robots.Isn’t relate to MoltenMCI.
Charlie doesnt bring five things together at all, and thats the common theme among all stories so THATS the important detail. So if the story relates to something that doesn't even follow that trend, it doesn't make any sense
@@ImpulseEvan37 that isn’t true. In the kittens story for example never 5 things become one, here is the story so you can confirm it: “Now I will tell you a story about a little boy. He had a red snake that he kept in a metal cage whose hunger could not be satisfied. One day, the boy found five baby kittens outside his house. He brought them inside and kept them in a shoebox. He knew that the snake might kill them, but could not bring himself to get rid of the snake. He knew that if he chose one kitten to feed to the snake, it might be satisfied, but he could not choose. So, he went to bed, leaving the cage open. The snake went to the shoebox, chose a kitten at random, and ate it. After five nights had gone by, the boy was full of regrets, and cut the snake open. He pieced the remains together and put the kitten back into the shoebox.” So that isn’t a characteristic of every story.The keys story is Charlie trying to save the kids but she doom them.
Five things literally do become one in the kitten story. It doesn't directly say it, but its HEAVILY implied that the snake ended up eating all the cats. There's five kittens, and the snake only MIGHT be satisfied by one, and he feels guilty after FIVE NIGHTS. Yes, all the kittens die, and their remains are stitched together into one. So it is a characteristic of every story. And even if it wasn't, Charlie STILL doesn't turn five things into one. She turns five things into five things. That's not the same. So again, that doesn't add up.
@@ImpulseEvan37 That explanation doesn’t work, the story tells that the snake only need to eat 1 kitten, so the snake doesn’t eat the other kittens in the five nights that pass before the boy feels regret.The stories aren’t of five things becoming one.Even then William never dismantled Golden Freddy so he will not have all the remanet.
I don't think charolette moved on with the rest of the kids (if happiest day wasn't just letting cc rest and putting together the pieces for him) because her business isn't done, cause william comes back/she has more souls to free (funtimes?). And if soul splitting is involved, the remnant could be from the toys since they were made with parts of the classics, especially if follow me is just one night. for the candy cadet stories I think- [key story- charollete (maybe having enough remnant to save one kid, but she trapped them instead?) orphans- michael snake- henry fnaf 6] I find it a stretch that michael went down to sl before but its an interesting take
I was toying with the idea of someone other than William putting them altogether as well but I couldn’t make sense of the why. Maybe the goal was to make them into Ennard, just not get killed while doing it.
You tell me just as in Fourth closet Classic Animatronics in !1993! were melted together to create one mashed up Buble of Remnant that contains all MCI kids' souls and agony, for !Someone who can Not be Afton in any case! put it in Funtimes who were !Crashed in 1987-88 While SL events! to make Ennard !who messed himself up to become giant bowl of Spagetti Molten Freddy?! Fnaf2-1987 SL-1987-88 Fnaf1-1993 Fnaf3-2015 FFPS-20??'s Where the Chicken(Funtimes) Crossed the Road with Withereds or Classics? When they all were CRASHED not Living.
My issue with the five keys melted together referencing William melting the og animatronics is that the girl tried to save five children but couldn't save any of them. Does that mean William was trying to save the missing kids by putting their remnant into the funtime animatronics?
@@ImpulseEvan37 You're right. I didn't finish the video. My bad. My question is this: Why do we need to be told the same exact story three times with slight variations? Wouldn't it make more sense if each story is meant to explain the POV of the characters in FNaF 6, and not just talking about the funtimes?
It's not a bad theory i just still only problem i have is well micheal i still don't know if Michael was trying to help anyone other then his sister and technically his dad by following his request and idk if he was trying to stop anyone also him dooming the kids idk i don't really think so and when it comes to candy cadet's stories i saw one compelling theory that even i thought about that one of the stories i think it was the woman being about how charlie failed to save the kids so just gave them new life instead
Funtime MCI theory doesnt make any sence. CB's Pizza World was built in 1980's in the first ever day Elizabeth dies there. Then Afton threw all the animatronics at CB's Ent. & Rental. Then in 1983 We see that her room is empty and then in Fredbear's Family Diner, Bite of 83 happens, Bite Victim The Crying Child dies in coma. Only then in first Freddy Fazbear's Pizza where (Un)Withered Animatronics performed, in 1985 Afton did the MCI who's victims were: Susie Jeremy Gabriel Fritz and Cassidy. In Withered, they were shipped to New FFP Fnaf2 location and used for parts.
Only After Fnaf 2's 7th night Shift Michael goes by Afton's will and goes to find his Sister and put her back together, and he goes to CB's Ent. & Rental, where all the SL events take place Meanwhile Withereds were remade into Classics and put into Fnaf 1 location and FFP was opened in 1988 till 1993
Personally I think ID'S Fantasy had the best interpretation of the candy cadet stories of The Woman and Kids - Charlie and the MCI Kids The Boy and the Snake - Michael and Baby The Old Man and the Orfins - Henry
The story about the boy and snake is clearly about Henry and William, in my opinion. FNAF 6 is mainly about Henry’s feelings where he blames himself for what Afton has become. Michael barely receives any spotlight in the game, despite being the protagonist.
I don't beliver Michael Afton is the responsible for putting the MCI Souls into the Funtime Animatronics. That's totally insane, ridiculous and non sense. And also: MoltenMCI is not theory- it's REAL/CANON/FACT confirmed since 2017/2018 that so many people ignore. You going against MoltenMCI is be denialist. It only shows how you misinterpret the FNAF games and books. Another thing you got wrong in your video is what William Afton NEVER injected Remnant in himself. He says that in The Fourth Closet. Go read it and you'll see that i'm not wrong. Anyway, that's it. Thank you for reading my commentary and good weekend.
You completely misunderstood the video…. Somehow. Mike putting the remnant in the funtimes isn’t insane for the reasons I literally provided in the video. I agree MoltenMCI is true. This theory literally requires it. How the hell do you think I’m denying it, I spent over half the video explaining why it’s true. I also never said he injected remnant into himself in the games, I simply said that he does that in the books. Which he does.
@@ImpulseEvan37So... You're right. It was a misconception mine. I've think you beliver MoltenMCI but doesn't take that as a fact. Sorry for my misconception, because i am a brasilian FNAF fan and i don't fully understand English. Anyway, great video by the same way. Also, i didn't say you was deying MoltenMCI. I was just trying to say what would you be if you denied the fact. And about that Afton stuff, i still don't accept Michael Afton being the responsible for MoltenMCI, okay? And did William Afton REALLY injected Remnant in himself in the books?
Finally someone who taking about past games im getting tired of ppl making theory's about fnaf sb and ruin
Then I would recommend sire squawks
@@bathilra5364 thx I check it out
To be fair, the past games seem to be mostly solved, so there aren't as many theories that can really be made.
@@clefairyfan333not really lol ppl just like all FNAF fans agree that William started killing because of the death of crying child which is not even confirm
Well tbf it is more recent so they're mostly just gonna bring up small things from that time frame plus most people are or at least the main channels soooo
I think Micheal doomed the kids much earlier when He killed his brother lol... I believe CC's death influences William's rage Towards Charlie.
interesting idea but i personally believe that sister location is the first time Michael ever goes into the bunker since he tells William he found it, and it was exactly where he said it would be. to me that means that he never knew where it was before the events of SL
not entirely sure about this but perhaps michael either spoke to william in the saferoom after he was springlocked (if his vocal chords werent severed of course) or he spoke to him just before and he told him what to do in sister location
This is a really good theory and I'm glad you explained how William could and could not have injected the remnant. Also having it be Michael doing it, but then with how Funtime Freddy/Molten act towards Michael, if he did that would the kids be that upset at him, especially if it meant they could go after William still?
Just subscribed. 😀👍
Honestly, you did a better job at explaining Henry’s speech than Matpat and his crew did.
Your theory is pretty convincing, but my thing is, if he went to sister location before, wouldn’t Baby recognize him? When Michael says, “I found it, it was right where you said it would be”.
He’s using the word “IT”, which is meant to be singular. So it’s possible that he could be referring to the secret entrance to the elevator that leads to the bunker. When Mike mentions, “They were all there. They didn’t recognize me at first but then, they thought I was you”. He could be referring to the funtimes. Given the funtimes have pieces of the OG kids, they would lash out at whoever reminds them of William. Even with the Biddybabs saying, “Someone is inside. Is it the same person?”
While I’m not against your theory, it is interesting.
I’d love to do a Discord chat with you about FNAF, that is if you’re interested? I won’t be upset if you say no.
I feel like if this theory is to be true he probably didn't encounter baby when he went to the facility for the first time. Baby doesn't get injected with remnant so he would have no reason to cross paths with her. Also what I was getting at was more that the "it" Mike is referring to is the spot the endos are at, not the endos themselves. Since he says "I found it. it was right where you said it would be. They were all there" it seems like the "it" is a place. It definitely could just be the facility, but I think this idea could work as well, and that bidybab line could mean that Michael has been down here before and they've seen him before.
Most of the missing kids are in Happiest Day. but I believe the Golden Freddy mask kid is CC not Cassidy and CC is the one in the endo Cassidy is in the shell, that's why the actual Golden Freddy suit is twitching at the end of UCN.
Otherwise I like the theory
this video made me realize michael is still alive after being scooped because the scooper injected him with remnant, and also molten freddy has remnant because hes basically enard
My only problem with molten MCI is that it doesn’t account for the fact that the funtimes unlike the OG 4 have their own distinct individual personalities and act very different compared to the OG 4 in fnaf 1 and 2
The evil AI was stronger and avoided the souls to act by their own will. In The Fourth Closet the Funtime animatronics were capturing kids because the souls thought William was just a cute SpringBonnie that was their friend, therefore, they obeyed his orders.
@@juliabp6057 But in the fourth closet they acted more like the fnaf one animatronics without their memories or their killer. And plus that doesn’t explain their behavior in the games as they are both fully conscious, very intelligent and have a hatred for Willian except for baby.
I think that Michael being the one that puts the souls into the funtimes does circumvent the main issue with the funtimes because it's believed that the funtimes were always built with the MCI victims inside, but if instead, the funtimes already existed and Michael inserted the MCI inside them, that immediately helps tremendously with the issue of the timeline.
There is one problem this has. Because there is only one kitten that dies in Candy Cadet's story, not 5. So "Michael" in this case wouldn't be so much the person that puts together the 5 MCI victims inside the funtimes, but rather 1 victim? It's a weird analogy. I think instead that the person that puts the dead kitten together is instead the father of the crying child after he tragically lost his youngest son to the bite of Freddy. Yeah, I think that William is this story's good person. Because I believe that he genuinely started with good intentions in trying to bring his youngest back to life.
It gets even weirder when you realise that the soon releasing movie implies William kidnapped his own son, Michael's younger brother. Because what if that's not just "bringing them inside and keeping them in a shoebox" but actually bringing them in his household like he (supposedly at least, according to the books) does with the other children?
This is honestly similar to what I believe
I simply believe Michael worked at the FNaF 1 location, made sure the animatronics are active, William told him what he'll do and what Michael has to do if he doesn't make it out of there
After William didn't make it out, Michael took the endos and melted them into remnant, put it in the scooper and worked in the facility
He then got to the scooper, trying to process what tf Ennard was talking about, and before he knew it, the scooper was activated
Michael didn't know that at the time and BAM, Michael was a skin suit that stayed alive with the help of the remnant and Elizabeth's motivational quote
Elizabeth did seem to be a good guy, well, at least to herself, and then moments later MCI kicked her ass out of Ennard
Mike came to a self-reflection like Logan Paul and he tried to picture himself as a hero by putting Elizabeth back together and totally freeing her
He also realized how the remnant was alive and had the consciousness of the children that thought he was William
Michael then finally came to a realization that smt is wrong with him because he's still alive, and he didn't know what tf was happening at first
Suddenly he realized it's the immortality and blah blah blah, the rest of the story
I'm a toy into funtime believer but the henry thing was new. He wasnt there for fnaf 2 (they had to contact the original owners which would give will a chance to swoop in). Im thinking he walked in on the empty shells on the Withereds before sealing up springtrap and just assumed their endos were used for the funtimes.
Basically molten mci is canon but it didn't exactly happen
Even if.
Funtimes were killing machines, when rented they could kill any kid in places while 1 on 1
They don't have to be MCI'85 kids
And Scooper who is a remnant infuzer could get and give back a lot of other kid's remnant.
So an idea with no basis other than "it could be" beats mountains of evidence
Sure makes perfect sense
@@ImpulseEvan37 Can the children control all of the individual funtimes (Outside Baby and the non-canon ones), or are they out of their control and they're just free roaming?
Are the fun times endos made of the same endos as the ogs or is he just putting some of it in there? Because if micheal didn't bulid them how did the endos get in there if william is dead and he died after he bulit the funtimes? Also is micheal finding melted metal, the fnaf 1 endos, or new parts made of the melted metal? And why does he decide to put it in the funtimes? How could william have melted the childern posessed metal but then be chased by the kids that are supposed to be trapped in the endoskeletons? And he cant do it after because he was trapped in the safe room
Honestly this is a decent idea but as IDs Fantasy said, the 3 stories don't tell the exact same story. 1 kitten gets eaten and saved, the 5 keys are said to save 5 other things, etc and as she said, the stories may repersent Charlie, Henry and Michael all working to achievethe same goal.
I agree with Molton MCI, but what i think is more likely that Ennard went to the location and used the animatronics to fuel him over the next 30 years and to keep his body together after discarding Baby. I think this because:
1. If the remnant was put in the funtimes by Michael with the scooper then their likely wouldn't be any remnant for Michael to absorb.
And 2. While Henry went to the saferoom, he would've seen the remains of the animatronics outside the saferoom but since he specifically says he doesn't know how they got into the Funtimes then they must of been taken before William was discovered.
What are your thoughts?
The Snake doesn't kill only one kitten. It only kills one on the first night, and five more nights go by and the boy feels more guilty as they pass. I severely doubt only one died, especially since... You know, its a snake. It wouldn't be done for 5 whole days. It definitely ate all the cats. And they don't get saved. And the stories DO all have to do with five things becoming one, they just show all of them differently, which i talked about in the video.
If Molten Freddy has remnant and is the funtimes and the funtimes in the fourth closet have remnant which is the missing kids spirits, It makes no sense that the funtimes wouldn't in the games but Molten Freddy would.
By the logic of there being no remnant for Michael to absorb, then there would be no remnant left in the fourth closet either. Each animatronics needs a small amount of remnant, they dont need the entire quantity of an endoskeleton per animatronic. 5 endoskeletons melted together wouldn't be completely gone after some of it is put into 3 animatronics.
Also I explained that last point in the video. William placed all the endoskeletons in one place for Michael to find, hence the endoskeletons not being on the ground with the remains of the animatronics despite endoskeletons appearing in the minigames regardless.
Yes they do practically tell the same story
5 kittens are eaten
Somone watched Dawko's "The ending cutscene really mean?" He bring the option of Mike, after S.L, go to dismantle the animatronics in the minigames, but became springtrap. I think mike wasnt 100% in his right mind, that there was "far-remote mind-control conection" ("you wont die") Ennard/Elizabeth/william might Forced/convinced him to hide in the SpringSuit when he Panicked from the "stitchwraith's victim looking ghosts", to complite some process of control, or to simply trick mike and trap him there.
William Afton stuffed the kids' corpses into the animatronics? What happened to their skeletons since they were stuffed into the Funtime animatronics and those went onto become Molten Freddy? What even is remnant and how do you even extract the kids' souls to make it and inject it? Are the missing kids' corpses just fused to Molten like William Afton's corpse is with Burnttrap?
So way later after the stuffing lids into suits he realizes they are posessed so he goes and breaks the robots apart and then somehow the endoskeletons of the robots which have the kids souls all get melted down into one and he uses that metal to make the fun times endoskeletons and it's used in enard. Or I guess Micheal did the melting because William died I'm not really sure how he got the endos in the fun times if he died and then was locked in the safe room?
Another idea I had is: What if it's Henry who put the remnant into the funtimes? What if the stories Candy Cadet told are meant to be in reference to Henry?
This almost makes me think of the secret ending being canon
I KNOW the scooping ending is canon I know I know but this idea makes me think of the secret ending
Really have come a long way, you were in Matpats video!!!
The Candy Cadet story of the woman and the keys doesn’t relate to Molten MCI, it relates to Charlie trying to release the souls of the kids.Charlie can release 1 children but when she tries to release them all she stuck them in the robots.Isn’t relate to MoltenMCI.
Charlie doesnt bring five things together at all, and thats the common theme among all stories so THATS the important detail. So if the story relates to something that doesn't even follow that trend, it doesn't make any sense
@@ImpulseEvan37 that isn’t true. In the kittens story for example never 5 things become one, here is the story so you can confirm it: “Now I will tell you a story about a little boy. He had a red snake that he kept in a metal cage whose hunger could not be satisfied. One day, the boy found five baby kittens outside his house. He brought them inside and kept them in a shoebox. He knew that the snake might kill them, but could not bring himself to get rid of the snake. He knew that if he chose one kitten to feed to the snake, it might be satisfied, but he could not choose. So, he went to bed, leaving the cage open. The snake went to the shoebox, chose a kitten at random, and ate it. After five nights had gone by, the boy was full of regrets, and cut the snake open. He pieced the remains together and put the kitten back into the shoebox.” So that isn’t a characteristic of every story.The keys story is Charlie trying to save the kids but she doom them.
Five things literally do become one in the kitten story. It doesn't directly say it, but its HEAVILY implied that the snake ended up eating all the cats. There's five kittens, and the snake only MIGHT be satisfied by one, and he feels guilty after FIVE NIGHTS. Yes, all the kittens die, and their remains are stitched together into one. So it is a characteristic of every story. And even if it wasn't, Charlie STILL doesn't turn five things into one. She turns five things into five things. That's not the same. So again, that doesn't add up.
@@gotyrase1753ah I see someone watched ids fantasy
@@ImpulseEvan37 That explanation doesn’t work, the story tells that the snake only need to eat 1 kitten, so the snake doesn’t eat the other kittens in the five nights that pass before the boy feels regret.The stories aren’t of five things becoming one.Even then William never dismantled Golden Freddy so he will not have all the remanet.
MoltenMCI is canon and still many people in the fandom started to deny it just because they feel it’s forced or simply because they don’t like it :v
His intro... it's evolving...
10:38-10:50 My brain exploded in this part
I don't think charolette moved on with the rest of the kids (if happiest day wasn't just letting cc rest and putting together the pieces for him) because her business isn't done, cause william comes back/she has more souls to free (funtimes?).
And if soul splitting is involved, the remnant could be from the toys since they were made with parts of the classics, especially if follow me is just one night.
for the candy cadet stories I think-
[key story- charollete (maybe having enough remnant to save one kid, but she trapped them instead?)
orphans- michael
snake- henry fnaf 6]
I find it a stretch that michael went down to sl before
but its an interesting take
I was toying with the idea of someone other than William putting them altogether as well but I couldn’t make sense of the why. Maybe the goal was to make them into Ennard, just not get killed while doing it.
You tell me just as in Fourth closet Classic Animatronics in !1993! were melted together to create one mashed up Buble of Remnant that contains all MCI kids' souls and agony, for !Someone who can Not be Afton in any case! put it in Funtimes who were !Crashed in 1987-88 While SL events! to make Ennard !who messed himself up to become giant bowl of Spagetti Molten Freddy?!
Fnaf2-1987
SL-1987-88
Fnaf1-1993
Fnaf3-2015
FFPS-20??'s
Where the Chicken(Funtimes)
Crossed the Road with Withereds or Classics? When they all were CRASHED not Living.
ah so this is what a stroke feels like
My issue with the five keys melted together referencing William melting the og animatronics is that the girl tried to save five children but couldn't save any of them. Does that mean William was trying to save the missing kids by putting their remnant into the funtime animatronics?
You either haven’t finished the video or just didn’t pay attention lol
@@ImpulseEvan37 You're right. I didn't finish the video. My bad. My question is this: Why do we need to be told the same exact story three times with slight variations? Wouldn't it make more sense if each story is meant to explain the POV of the characters in FNaF 6, and not just talking about the funtimes?
in ruin, candy cadet tells a story of whats about to happen, is that the same for pizza sim?
It's not a bad theory i just still only problem i have is well micheal i still don't know if Michael was trying to help anyone other then his sister and technically his dad by following his request and idk if he was trying to stop anyone also him dooming the kids idk i don't really think so and when it comes to candy cadet's stories i saw one compelling theory that even i thought about that one of the stories i think it was the woman being about how charlie failed to save the kids so just gave them new life instead
I dont agree but good theory! I am curious about 1 thing.
Why do you think Michael has nightmares about the FNAF4 tests?
Funtime MCI theory doesnt make any sence.
CB's Pizza World was built in 1980's in the first ever day Elizabeth dies there. Then Afton threw all the animatronics at CB's Ent. & Rental.
Then in 1983 We see that her room is empty and then in Fredbear's Family Diner, Bite of 83 happens, Bite Victim The Crying Child dies in coma. Only then in first Freddy Fazbear's Pizza where (Un)Withered Animatronics performed, in 1985 Afton did the MCI who's victims were: Susie Jeremy Gabriel Fritz and Cassidy. In Withered, they were shipped to New FFP Fnaf2 location and used for parts.
....................................................... so?
Only After Fnaf 2's 7th night Shift Michael goes by Afton's will and goes to find his Sister and put her back together, and he goes to CB's Ent. & Rental, where all the SL events take place Meanwhile Withereds were remade into Classics and put into Fnaf 1 location and FFP was opened in 1988 till 1993
Sister location is after fnaf 1.
@@ImpulseEvan37tell me the year Afton died.
some time after 1993.
Personally I think ID'S Fantasy had the best interpretation of the candy cadet stories of
The Woman and Kids - Charlie and the MCI Kids
The Boy and the Snake - Michael and Baby
The Old Man and the Orfins - Henry
The story about the boy and snake is clearly about Henry and William, in my opinion. FNAF 6 is mainly about Henry’s feelings where he blames himself for what Afton has become. Michael barely receives any spotlight in the game, despite being the protagonist.
I don't beliver Michael Afton is the responsible for putting the MCI Souls into the Funtime Animatronics. That's totally insane, ridiculous and non sense.
And also: MoltenMCI is not theory- it's REAL/CANON/FACT confirmed since 2017/2018 that so many people ignore. You going against MoltenMCI is be denialist. It only shows how you misinterpret the FNAF games and books.
Another thing you got wrong in your video is what William Afton NEVER injected Remnant in himself. He says that in The Fourth Closet. Go read it and you'll see that i'm not wrong.
Anyway, that's it. Thank you for reading my commentary and good weekend.
You completely misunderstood the video…. Somehow.
Mike putting the remnant in the funtimes isn’t insane for the reasons I literally provided in the video. I agree MoltenMCI is true. This theory literally requires it. How the hell do you think I’m denying it, I spent over half the video explaining why it’s true. I also never said he injected remnant into himself in the games, I simply said that he does that in the books. Which he does.
@@ImpulseEvan37So... You're right. It was a misconception mine.
I've think you beliver MoltenMCI but doesn't take that as a fact.
Sorry for my misconception, because i am a brasilian FNAF fan and i don't fully understand English.
Anyway, great video by the same way. Also, i didn't say you was deying MoltenMCI. I was just trying to say what would you be if you denied the fact.
And about that Afton stuff, i still don't accept Michael Afton being the responsible for MoltenMCI, okay?
And did William Afton REALLY injected Remnant in himself in the books?
All the proof never say MCI tho, and we have 10+ victim and 2 set of 5 childern
if you actually believe that then you didn't understand
ShatteredElizabeth?
Wait i doomed them?
Apparently(I didn't watch the video)
yes
According to the vid
Im more on the side of toy mci and rockstar mci to be honest lol, or even springtrap mci
I hate William afton
He's the man who started all gotta love the man 😍
As a character in the franchise, or just his actions?
@@loganentertainment1814both
Aftons simp head
I unsubscribe to game theory