Echoherb My thought exactly when I first heard this many years ago, and still of the same opinion; there's nothing like it for combining intellect with power
Frédéric Chopin Come on mate...Chopin even claimed himself that his concerti aren't anything special and I'm saying this as someone who knows literally every work published in his lifetime
I am only becoming acquanited with P recently (and I'm 50). Wish I had heard him earlier. He is without doubt the pinnicle of 20th century musicianship emotionally and technically. I'm a huge Shos fan with his perfect capturing of the bleakness of Soviet Russia and mystery, and Stravinsky with his shocking ballets and Noces, and Mahler's giant symps, but P is like the Bach of the 20th century: note rich, masterful melody, iron clad harmonic drive and consistently producing supremely high quality work one after another in all musical fields; and with a genuine and unwavering commitment to a dissonant and melodic personal language. I think the care he takes with all instruments, the combinations, the sonorousness he can get from dissonance, and the extensive development of melody themes is almost Wagnerian. This concerto is a brilliant example. And if all this wasn't enough you have to turn to his personal journey. He managed to hold (mostly) true to his 'difficult' style despite huge opposition at times (including from his mother, student friends "P can't write 3 correct notes in a row") and (frankly) not a very successful career, putting up with rejection and knowing he needed to keep going. And then he does, with so many virtually flawless masterpieces, in unexpected areas as well ... sonatas, some chamber, a cello concerto!, film music, choral works, songs,). I wish he had had some more success in Paris and lived after Stalin: he deserved it and we would have had more symphonies, piano sonatas and most likely chamber work, maybe a final opera. So much more we would have had. Makes what we do have that much more valuable. This concerto was written at an astonishing 22. Makes you realise what a genius the St P conservatory had on it's hands when P said in his notes at the age of 14 that he was so disinterested in the harmony classes. He had sufficiently mastered classical & romantic harmony, had established a whole new language by 17.
The line between what we are used to call classical music and jazz becomes thin, especially in the first movement. This is really incredible extreme music, with Mr. Petrov in total control of it; few pianist will come near to it. Sometimes I come back here and always I am in great surprise, both for the colorful music and the brightness of the piano.
That cadenza... The genius behind it is the fact it's so difficult. Every pianist seems to be fighting for their life, giving it such a sense of desperation and hopelessness. Then the orchestra comes in and just WOW
When I saw this live for the first time I was transported to another world. Such power from both Piano and orchestra. Only this and the Rach 3 have had such a profound impact live.
Just superlative in every way. Petrov's playing of course is incredible but also let's not forget the orchestra which I thought was also outstanding and of course the genius mind of Prokofiev who was able to compose such a thing. People talk about the Rach 3rd has being difficult. This is every bit as difficult if not more in some ways. Such a constant need for power and energy. The piano barely gets a break and consistently scary difficult.
I've always held that Rach is the superior songwriter, in that his more memorable melodic phrases (while difficult) usually require a less intuitively percussive and physical approach - Prokofiev on the other hand is more about dissonance, inflection and timbre, often times calling for extreme physical demands of stamina and rhythm. I think this concerto is specifically meant to showcase such traits
It does but actually the whole concerto is an earthquake. This is incredible, both the composition and the recording. You rarely hear something like it.
Hello! I just want to share with you my Symphonic Poem! I m very inspired by russian Orquestal Music! Hope you will enjoy it ua-cam.com/video/FtgOpfUirT4/v-deo.html
That is the best part of the whole concert. Emotion pure! Fantastic preparation by full stop at 9:54. Never heard this in that way. Well done Mr. Petrov!
I first heard this concerto back in the early sixties; Malcolm Frager featured it on his program when he won the competition in 1960 in Brussel, Belgium. It was considered unplayable at the time and most pianist avoided it. There is an old recording of Vladimir Ashkenazy playing this piece, but then, few others. Ashkenazy's rendition is blisteringly fast. John browning's ( later ) is great as well. For me however, It is Frager. The sound of the piano is thick and deep. Which is just right for this particular work. A welcome turn around after multiple hearings of Prokfiev's third in in C major; Now, a number guys are programing the second. It can be played. A lot of practice and patience.
I must thank you very much for your efforts to put the scores on with the music. I think it's extraordinary to find a channel like yours where so much effort is put in for us to be able to study the scores while listening.
I trawl around listening to only the cadenza of this greatest of piano concertos, and this is definitely one of the most lucid renditions of it I have ever heard. He took the arpeggios a little tentatively it sounded like, but he was really tracking the throughline of the cadenza's logic. Consequently, I had to listen to the whole thing. Loving the savagery in the third movement. Sometimes the polite people have to round off Prokofiev's edges and that's always a mistake.
This recording is astonishing. You were lucky to be there, bucc, this rendition has set a standard. mr. Petrov goes right to the core. Well he is Russian too..........
Ok, so wow, just wow! I wish classisal music would be so cool than it was in my childhood, or is time changes? I do not want to live at another time, this music is so mesmerising
This is an amazing playing by Nikolai Petrov the piano sound is second to none.Only one who have more colors with his piano sound is Ashkenazy his recording.Also the furious one by Alexei Sultanov.The old master Yakov Zak many thinks his the king Prokofjev 2 player
Nikolai Arnoldovich Petrov nació en el seno de una familia de músicos rusos ilustres, entre ellos, el reconocido bajo Vasily Rodionovich Petrov, que pasó veinte años como solista en el Teatro Bolshói, donde se formó musicalmente con estrellas tales como Shaliapin, Antonina Nezhdanova y otros grandes cantantes de ópera. Comenzó sus estudios de piano en la Escuela Musical Central del Conservatorio de Moscú bajo la batuta de Tatyana Kestner en 1961 y posteriormente, entre 1962 y 1968 entró en el conservatorio como tal donde recibió clases de Yakov Zak.1 Petrov compartió escenario con los principales directores de Rusia, tales como Evgeny Svetlanov, Kiril Kondrashin, Yuri Temirkanov, Gennadi Rozhdéstvenski, Arvid y Maris Janson, Pavel Kogan, y muchos otros. Tocó junto a la Orquesta Sinfónica de Nueva York, la Orquesta Nacional Sinfónica de Washington, la Orquesta Sinfónica de Los Ángeles, y las orquestas europeas más prestigiosas como la Filarmónica de Berlín, la Sinfónica de Londres y la Orquesta de AHK. A lo largo de su carrera Petrov editó unas veinte grabaciones en disco en el sello Olympia del Reino Unido y en el sello ruso Melodia, entre otros. Trabajó como profesor en el Conservatorio de Moscú. También fue el presidente de la Academia Rusa de las Artes, el presidente de la sección de la música del consejo presidencial sobre cultura y las artes; así como miembro del comité ruso del premio del estado. El 1 de octubre de 1998 creó la Fundación Filantrópica Internacional de Nikolai Petrov.1 Murió el 3 de agosto de 2011, a los 68 años de edad, a causa de un derrame cerebral en Moscú.2 Repertorio[editar] El repertorio de Petrov incluye alrededor de cincuenta conciertos solistas y cincuenta y cinco conciertos acompañado de orquesta. Muchos de ellos como solista en funciones de la premier de Moscú y en otras ciudades a través del mundo. Asimismo ha interpretado tres conciertos de Bach, todos los conciertos del piano de Beethoven, incluyendo la Fantasía coral, todos los conciertos de piano de Rachmaninov, incluyendo el estreno de la primera edición del Concierto n.º 4. Petrov preparó junto a la organista Ludmila Golub el programa "Música francesa para piano y órgano", que fue elegido como el mejor programa musical de 1996 por la revista Musical Review. En el mismo año también fue elegido músico del año. 1 Premios y reconocimientos[editar] En 1962 ganó la medalla de plata en el primer Concurso Internacional de Piano Van Cliburn en Estados Unidos. En 1964 conquistó la medalla de plata en la Concurso Internacional Musical de la reina Elizabeth en Bruselas. En 1986 la Académie Balzac le concedió su Grande Medaille d'Or por las excelentes interpretaciones que había hecho por todo el mundo de obras de Berlioz, Beethoven y Liszt. En 1991 fue laureado con la condecoración Artista del pueblo de la URSS. En 1993 se le concedió el Premio Estatal de la Federación de Rusia. En 2008 obtuvo la Orden de Honor de Rusia.
It is so beatiful! How was it possible that such composers visited this planet? After sertain point they all left us alone.. Prokofiev and Khachaturian were the last ones
Does someone know any familiar pieces? The Piano Concerto 2 is some piece of music I cant get enough from. It'll left me speechless everytime I hear it in it's full glory.
Unfortunately, there is nothing like this piece of music that exists in the piano repertoire or any other musical medium for that matter. However, even though it is a completely different style, the Barber Piano Concerto will likely evoke some of the same feelings that this does (with less 'romanticism', at least Prokofiev's version of it). Other suggestions would be: Medtner - Piano Concerto No. 2, Tcherepnin Piano Concerto No. 1, and Rzewski's solo piano piece The People United Will Never Be Defeated.
I usually like to pair this (and #3) with Stravinsky. After that, it's really an open question as to where you end up. Usually stepping forward and going more modern is easier at this point than heading back.
I am SO SORRY....I would have SCREAMED MY GUTS OUT when that was over! What was the rest of the audience reaction? What you let us hear was such a let DOWN! Of course then, I was positively MESMERIZED!!!!!!!!!
Not even close, Prokofiev's most Rachmaninov-like work more like. The third and fifth concertos are much more original, not to mention countless works in other genres. I'd say the sonata for violin & piano or the 8th piano sonata are prime candidates for the best thing he ever wrote
I would add to that (while I respectfully disagree and think this is one of the best piano concertos ever written, and Prokofiev's best with the 5th and 3rd being very close tie as you mention), Piano Sonata No. 6 and the underrated No. 4 could also have cases made for them. (No. 4 includes some of the best counterpoint used in contemporary piano literature in the 2nd mvt.).
To me the first movement's closest relative is Bach's c minor Passacaglia and Fugue - they both take a simple theme and turn it into the pinnacle of human achievement.
Historically, dotted eights and sixteenths were often used as a shorthand for a bracketed triplet containing a quarter followed by an eighth. I do not know for certain what Prokofiev's intentions were, but technically there is a precedent for what Mr. Petrov is doing here.
Chad414 is correct. While historically it was true that dotted rhythms were a shorthand way of notating triplets, such is the case in Bach, that is certainly not the case in 20th century music. If you look throughout Prokofiev's other works, you'll see he has no problem notating triplets when his intentions are such, and dotted rhythms when his intentions are such. Furthermore, the fact that he notates triplets in the LH, actually makes the case that it is suppose to be dotted, seeing as he made the distinction in what he wrote. Lastly, had he wanted them to be triplets he would have written the RH in 12/8 as well, which he clearly did not. 4/4 is a simple quadruple meter, while 12/8 is a compound quadruple meter. The reason 4/4 is simple is because the beat is divided by divisions of 2. The reason 12/8 is compound is because the beat is divided by divisions of 3. Prokofiev knew this and was intentional in what he wrote.
Wow... just wow... First of all, the thing could have been written yesterday, since it's a such a perfect mix of romanticism and modernity. Second, the soloist's technique and his endless intensity give this a full expression of the anguish Prokofiev must have felt, during the composing process, over a colleague's suicide. As a younger man I found the first movement unduly harsh and ugly, and now I realize it's just brutally honest. Oh, and this just happened to be a live performance. Whatever's in the tap water in Stockholm, I want it if it will make me a spiffy performer too.
Bravissimo, Petrov! This is one of the top 3 performances of this monumental masterpiece. The concerto has such hair raising bravura that even Richter, Horowitz and Argerich wouldn't go near it. Less than 5 pianist in history can do it justice. Especially the atrociously difficult cadenza in the first movement. Petrov is flawless.
Richter could most definitely play this. However, after hearing the Bolet recording in the 50's, he declared that no other pianist need to record the work again. Of course, Bolet takes the cuts, which makes it less ideal for today's standards. Have you heard the Baloghová recording? If not, I'm quite sure she'll make your short list.
22:46 is a funny unintended effect, for a few secs the theme starts in ppp, followed by the actual start of the final mvmt. Mvmts 2 & 3 too slow for my taste.
Now that I have heard about 20 performances, unfortunately Mr. Petrov gets bumped from the top 5. This new generation has much more virtuosic technical facility (not necessarily artistic). This is now standard repertoire and competition material. 30 years ago only a handful of pianist would even attempt it and no one expected a pianist to learn this concerto. 40 years before that the Tchaikovsky was considered unplayable by some. Times have changed and I love it:)
Not true! The best beautiful colorful piano sound players are Really=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Artur Rubinstein Radu Lupu Vladimir Ashkenazy! Todays pianist do not have the sound! More Powerful Louder than Petrov=Mikhail Pletnev Supernova Explosion Power!( Prokofiev piano concerto no 1 by Pletnev!) The Second Loudest pianist was Lazar Berman! The most Genius=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Alexei Lubimov Stanislav Igolinsky! The majority of todays players are so cold and boring! Top 5??
I guess its becasue he is palying in the really traditional way. I read an article said that after WII, most of the symphonies played fastger and faster than before, even Karajan's Bethophen is 25% faster than some older versions. But prokofiev is a hidden master who do not show himself too often in the public and may also live a old style of life I guess, that's why most of his interpretation sounds slower but more graceful and full. I mean, I prefer hus style for sure, we shall walk slower and wait for our soul.
Try Paisiello piano concerto no 4 Georg Anton Benda Harpsichord concerto b Minor ( we want The piano version) JS Bach Piano Harpsichord Concerto 1052 My favourites Are Chopin piano concerto no 2 Brahms 1-2 Rachmaninov 1 Mozart 22
Sorry, what mistakes. Can you please point out exactly by bar and note just one mistake where he either played the wrong note or the right note at the wrong time. These are the only objective mistakes. Everything else is subjective
In regards to the Prokofiev 2nd concerto; By guys are playing this piece, I mean chicks and dudes as well. Yuja Wang just eats it up, Like she does with anything she tackles.
Petrov is very good, but his left hand vamp at the very beginning is too prosaic, and doesn't support the right hand melody. The opening should be played "narrante" -- narrating -- meaning telling a story.
It wasn't Prokofiev's intention making this piece so difficult. But he knew how he wanted this piece to sound like and the only option to make the piece sound like that was making the piece difficult like hell.
It's a great question. When he wrote it he had not planned to make it difficult, and then as the music started to take shape he realised where it was going he had to follow, even through he was frustrated by what was happening. The piece had a life of it's own and he just had to write out what was coming out. CPE Bach said his father had the same problem.
+Banana Hunter Pro He's setting up an important motif that occurs throughout the entire first movement, he probably should keep it in. If you need help finding it elsewhere, listen for it in the orchestra right after the cadenza (piano solo).
Flexyhandz You're absolutely right! When I commented, I'd only listened to this a few times. Now its a year on, I've had time to properly hear the sophistications in the piece and its such an extraordinary work. I suppose it's too great and complex a concerto to judge on a few listens...
That cadenza brings me to tears. Some of the greatest piano writing in the history of concert music in my opinion.
Echoherb My thought exactly when I first heard this many years ago, and still of the same opinion; there's nothing like it for combining intellect with power
PieInTheSky I played this! It’s on my UA-cam channel!
Yes,!
This is the most impressive cadenza I've ever heard in the whole classical piano repertoire.
it pretty much made me forget the ossia cadenza in rach's third
I don't think I could ever forget the Rach 3 ossia. C'mon! It's a masterpiece!
@@AiAiTheMonkey they are both.
Yep, and Ashkenazy played it the best by far.
I played this! It’s on my UA-cam channel!
This is the absolute pinnacle of piano and any kind of music.
This whole piece is the work of an insane genius. 29:27 and the build up to that monstrously difficult last movement cadenza... speechless
One of, if not the, greatest piano concertos ever written.
I am just simply amazed by Prokofiev himself. In my opinion, this is the most incredible piano concerto ever written.
Kurt V what about mine????
Frédéric Chopin Come on mate...Chopin even claimed himself that his concerti aren't anything special and I'm saying this as someone who knows literally every work published in his lifetime
@@fredericchopin2453 They are cute at best
@@fredericchopin2453 beeeeeeeeeerk !!
I am only becoming acquanited with P recently (and I'm 50). Wish I had heard him earlier. He is without doubt the pinnicle of 20th century musicianship emotionally and technically. I'm a huge Shos fan with his perfect capturing of the bleakness of Soviet Russia and mystery, and Stravinsky with his shocking ballets and Noces, and Mahler's giant symps, but P is like the Bach of the 20th century: note rich, masterful melody, iron clad harmonic drive and consistently producing supremely high quality work one after another in all musical fields; and with a genuine and unwavering commitment to a dissonant and melodic personal language. I think the care he takes with all instruments, the combinations, the sonorousness he can get from dissonance, and the extensive development of melody themes is almost Wagnerian. This concerto is a brilliant example. And if all this wasn't enough you have to turn to his personal journey. He managed to hold (mostly) true to his 'difficult' style despite huge opposition at times (including from his mother, student friends "P can't write 3 correct notes in a row") and (frankly) not a very successful career, putting up with rejection and knowing he needed to keep going. And then he does, with so many virtually flawless masterpieces, in unexpected areas as well ... sonatas, some chamber, a cello concerto!, film music, choral works, songs,). I wish he had had some more success in Paris and lived after Stalin: he deserved it and we would have had more symphonies, piano sonatas and most likely chamber work, maybe a final opera. So much more we would have had. Makes what we do have that much more valuable. This concerto was written at an astonishing 22. Makes you realise what a genius the St P conservatory had on it's hands when P said in his notes at the age of 14 that he was so disinterested in the harmony classes. He had sufficiently mastered classical & romantic harmony, had established a whole new language by 17.
Genius! Prokofiev's mind is out of this world. Loved those dissonances so much and that cadenza in the 1st mvt... just epic.
The line between what we are used to call classical music and jazz becomes thin, especially in the first movement. This is really incredible extreme music, with Mr. Petrov in total control of it; few pianist will come near to it. Sometimes I come back here and always I am in great surprise, both for the colorful music and the brightness of the piano.
No lol. Don't you have ears?? Exactly what here is even reminiscent of jazz??
That cadenza... The genius behind it is the fact it's so difficult. Every pianist seems to be fighting for their life, giving it such a sense of desperation and hopelessness. Then the orchestra comes in and just WOW
Sean Fogarty I played this! It’s on my UA-cam channel!
14:28 with eyes closed is simply dramatic film music before its time ! How did Prokofiev accomplish so much !
When I saw this live for the first time I was transported to another world. Such power from both Piano and orchestra. Only this and the Rach 3 have had such a profound impact live.
Just superlative in every way. Petrov's playing of course is incredible but also let's not forget the orchestra which I thought was also outstanding and of course the genius mind of Prokofiev who was able to compose such a thing. People talk about the Rach 3rd has being difficult. This is every bit as difficult if not more in some ways. Such a constant need for power and energy. The piano barely gets a break and consistently scary difficult.
I've always held that Rach is the superior songwriter, in that his more memorable melodic phrases (while difficult) usually require a less intuitively percussive and physical approach - Prokofiev on the other hand is more about dissonance, inflection and timbre, often times calling for extreme physical demands of stamina and rhythm. I think this concerto is specifically meant to showcase such traits
Very high among my new favorites. Petrov has always been high on my list of our greatest pianists.
One has to see this score to appreciate the difficulty...love it
Cannot understand why there are so few "likes" in this wonderful performance...
Never heard that 3rd mov played so slowly and with such intent and such power. Really amazing.
honda412000 Agreed, really fascinating interpretation, definitely works, and I prefer it over faster versions
Me, either. It imparts an entirely different character and mood--akin to a giant slogging through the Russian Steppes. I love it.
This is my favorite Prokofiev piano concerto
This is definitely one of the best performances ever of this concerto. Thanks for sharing it!
[00:03] Andantino -- Allegretto.
[11:39] Scherzo: Vivace.
[14:27] Intermezzo: Allegro moderato.
[22:47] Finale: Allegro tempestoso.
Brilliant performance of one of the most challenging works in the entire piano repertoire.
INCREDIBLE! Absolutely brilliant playing!
Не побоюсь сказать.что этот концерт номер 1 в фортепианной литературе.
i listen to this music in the library on headphoneAnd when the music ends, i just applaud and stand up with saying "bravo bravo!!"
great!
김동준 I just wonder what was the reaction of other people xD
26:20 - 27:15
I'm crying :'(
Love this theme.
I completely agree, it's a gorgeous theme.
NomadRussian: This theme is so beautiful it makes me wish I played the bassoon. 😎🎹
Hi
What a monster of a piano concerto!
the return of the orchestra after the cadenza seems like an earthquake
It does but actually the whole concerto is an earthquake. This is incredible, both the composition and the recording. You rarely hear something like it.
Gaetano La Montagna I played this! It’s on my UA-cam channel!
Hello! I just want to share with you my Symphonic Poem! I m very inspired by russian Orquestal Music! Hope you will enjoy it ua-cam.com/video/FtgOpfUirT4/v-deo.html
That is the best part of the whole concert. Emotion pure! Fantastic preparation by full stop at 9:54. Never heard this in that way. Well done Mr. Petrov!
the clarinet in the beginning is simply gorgeous.
I first heard this concerto back in the early sixties; Malcolm Frager featured it on his program when he won the competition in
1960 in Brussel, Belgium. It was considered unplayable at the time and most pianist avoided it. There is an old recording of
Vladimir Ashkenazy playing this piece, but then, few others. Ashkenazy's rendition is blisteringly fast. John browning's ( later ) is
great as well. For me however, It is Frager. The sound of the piano is thick and deep. Which is just right for this particular work.
A welcome turn around after multiple hearings of Prokfiev's third in in C major; Now, a number guys are programing the second.
It can be played. A lot of practice and patience.
I must thank you very much for your efforts to put the scores on with the music. I think it's extraordinary to find a channel like yours where so much effort is put in for us to be able to study the scores while listening.
I trawl around listening to only the cadenza of this greatest of piano concertos, and this is definitely one of the most lucid renditions of it I have ever heard. He took the arpeggios a little tentatively it sounded like, but he was really tracking the throughline of the cadenza's logic. Consequently, I had to listen to the whole thing. Loving the savagery in the third movement. Sometimes the polite people have to round off Prokofiev's edges and that's always a mistake.
This recording is astonishing. You were lucky to be there, bucc, this rendition has set a standard. mr. Petrov goes right to the core. Well he is Russian too..........
The counterpoint between the piano and orchestra in each of the movements is magnificent!
The tempo for the 3rd movement is perfect
Who knew? So savage.
Ok, so wow, just wow! I wish classisal music would be so cool than it was in my childhood, or is time changes? I do not want to live at another time, this music is so mesmerising
This is an amazing playing by Nikolai Petrov the piano sound is second to none.Only one who have more colors with his piano sound is Ashkenazy his recording.Also the furious one by Alexei Sultanov.The old master Yakov Zak many thinks his the king Prokofjev 2 player
An amazing performance.
Nikolai Arnoldovich Petrov nació en el seno de una familia de músicos rusos ilustres, entre ellos, el reconocido bajo Vasily Rodionovich Petrov, que pasó veinte años como solista en el Teatro Bolshói, donde se formó musicalmente con estrellas tales como Shaliapin, Antonina Nezhdanova y otros grandes cantantes de ópera. Comenzó sus estudios de piano en la Escuela Musical Central del Conservatorio de Moscú bajo la batuta de Tatyana Kestner en 1961 y posteriormente, entre 1962 y 1968 entró en el conservatorio como tal donde recibió clases de Yakov Zak.1
Petrov compartió escenario con los principales directores de Rusia, tales como Evgeny Svetlanov, Kiril Kondrashin, Yuri Temirkanov, Gennadi Rozhdéstvenski, Arvid y Maris Janson, Pavel Kogan, y muchos otros. Tocó junto a la Orquesta Sinfónica de Nueva York, la Orquesta Nacional Sinfónica de Washington, la Orquesta Sinfónica de Los Ángeles, y las orquestas europeas más prestigiosas como la Filarmónica de Berlín, la Sinfónica de Londres y la Orquesta de AHK. A lo largo de su carrera Petrov editó unas veinte grabaciones en disco en el sello Olympia del Reino Unido y en el sello ruso Melodia, entre otros.
Trabajó como profesor en el Conservatorio de Moscú. También fue el presidente de la Academia Rusa de las Artes, el presidente de la sección de la música del consejo presidencial sobre cultura y las artes; así como miembro del comité ruso del premio del estado. El 1 de octubre de 1998 creó la Fundación Filantrópica Internacional de Nikolai Petrov.1 Murió el 3 de agosto de 2011, a los 68 años de edad, a causa de un derrame cerebral en Moscú.2
Repertorio[editar]
El repertorio de Petrov incluye alrededor de cincuenta conciertos solistas y cincuenta y cinco conciertos acompañado de orquesta. Muchos de ellos como solista en funciones de la premier de Moscú y en otras ciudades a través del mundo. Asimismo ha interpretado tres conciertos de Bach, todos los conciertos del piano de Beethoven, incluyendo la Fantasía coral, todos los conciertos de piano de Rachmaninov, incluyendo el estreno de la primera edición del Concierto n.º 4. Petrov preparó junto a la organista Ludmila Golub el programa "Música francesa para piano y órgano", que fue elegido como el mejor programa musical de 1996 por la revista Musical Review. En el mismo año también fue elegido músico del año. 1
Premios y reconocimientos[editar]
En 1962 ganó la medalla de plata en el primer Concurso Internacional de Piano Van Cliburn en Estados Unidos.
En 1964 conquistó la medalla de plata en la Concurso Internacional Musical de la reina Elizabeth en Bruselas.
En 1986 la Académie Balzac le concedió su Grande Medaille d'Or por las excelentes interpretaciones que había hecho por todo el mundo de obras de Berlioz, Beethoven y Liszt.
En 1991 fue laureado con la condecoración Artista del pueblo de la URSS.
En 1993 se le concedió el Premio Estatal de la Federación de Rusia.
En 2008 obtuvo la Orden de Honor de Rusia.
Petrov just leaves me petrified...
Petrovied
It is so beatiful! How was it possible that such composers visited this planet? After sertain point they all left us alone.. Prokofiev and Khachaturian were the last ones
Does someone know any familiar pieces? The Piano Concerto 2 is some piece of music I cant get enough from. It'll left me speechless everytime I hear it in it's full glory.
Unfortunately, there is nothing like this piece of music that exists in the piano repertoire or any other musical medium for that matter. However, even though it is a completely different style, the Barber Piano Concerto will likely evoke some of the same feelings that this does (with less 'romanticism', at least Prokofiev's version of it).
Other suggestions would be: Medtner - Piano Concerto No. 2, Tcherepnin Piano Concerto No. 1, and Rzewski's solo piano piece The People United Will Never Be Defeated.
Oh, and Prokofiev 1 if for some reason you haven't already heard it.
I usually like to pair this (and #3) with Stravinsky. After that, it's really an open question as to where you end up. Usually stepping forward and going more modern is easier at this point than heading back.
Roar from Cloverfield
I am SO SORRY....I would have SCREAMED MY GUTS OUT when that was over! What was the rest of the audience reaction? What you let us hear was such a let DOWN! Of course then, I was positively MESMERIZED!!!!!!!!!
10:12 Epic moment.
cadenza magnifica
zoooooo.......fantastische muziek zeg!
Shocking music. This is for my mp3 player; an amazing Nikolai Petrov indeed.
Thanks for uploading!
How could anyone write this? And how could anyone play this with such accuracy, depth, and power? Beyond miraculous if that's possible.
Prokofiev's best work. Nikolai Petrov maybe is not a famous pianist, but he really does perfect!
Not even close, Prokofiev's most Rachmaninov-like work more like. The third and fifth concertos are much more original, not to mention countless works in other genres. I'd say the sonata for violin & piano or the 8th piano sonata are prime candidates for the best thing he ever wrote
I would add to that (while I respectfully disagree and think this is one of the best piano concertos ever written, and Prokofiev's best with the 5th and 3rd being very close tie as you mention), Piano Sonata No. 6 and the underrated No. 4 could also have cases made for them. (No. 4 includes some of the best counterpoint used in contemporary piano literature in the 2nd mvt.).
@@XavierMacX Oh man that 2nd movement of the 4th is so incomprehensibly beautiful. I wish I could get into the rest of the 4th sonata as well.
This is an amazing playing by Petrov
Confermo
Hell probably sounds like this concerto's cadenza.
Ahmed B I played this! It’s on my UA-cam channel!
@@Johnnywhatagentleman could you please link your video
Fantastic!!
I'm completely knocked down by this!
He does, how marvelous!
It is incredible...
10:12 EPIC!!!
페트로프님 굉장하시네요! 멋집니다!
16:40
Gotta love them chromatics!
To me the first movement's closest relative is Bach's c minor Passacaglia and Fugue - they both take a simple theme and turn it into the pinnacle of human achievement.
he plays the opening RH notes as triplets not as written semi quavers.I still love his playing.
Historically, dotted eights and sixteenths were often used as a shorthand for a bracketed triplet containing a quarter followed by an eighth. I do not know for certain what Prokofiev's intentions were, but technically there is a precedent for what Mr. Petrov is doing here.
I don t think it s right what he does here
chad414 It's right. The meter is 12/8 so they're supposed to sound like triplets in that context.
+Rory reviewer Well, technically the right hand is in 4/4, but yes.
Chad414 is correct. While historically it was true that dotted rhythms were a shorthand way of notating triplets, such is the case in Bach, that is certainly not the case in 20th century music. If you look throughout Prokofiev's other works, you'll see he has no problem notating triplets when his intentions are such, and dotted rhythms when his intentions are such.
Furthermore, the fact that he notates triplets in the LH, actually makes the case that it is suppose to be dotted, seeing as he made the distinction in what he wrote. Lastly, had he wanted them to be triplets he would have written the RH in 12/8 as well, which he clearly did not. 4/4 is a simple quadruple meter, while 12/8 is a compound quadruple meter. The reason 4/4 is simple is because the beat is divided by divisions of 2. The reason 12/8 is compound is because the beat is divided by divisions of 3. Prokofiev knew this and was intentional in what he wrote.
Great recording considering it was done back in the 80's.
the slower tempo (compared to recent performances) allowed me to follow the score and notice how Petrov hit every note with a force that was indicated
I agree. The mic'ing makes the whole thing very "in my face" which I approve of.
This an amazing
Wow... just wow... First of all, the thing could have been written yesterday, since it's a such a perfect mix of romanticism and modernity. Second, the soloist's technique and his endless intensity give this a full expression of the anguish Prokofiev must have felt, during the composing process, over a colleague's suicide. As a younger man I found the first movement unduly harsh and ugly, and now I realize it's just brutally honest. Oh, and this just happened to be a live performance. Whatever's in the tap water in Stockholm, I want it if it will make me a spiffy performer too.
Bravissimo, Petrov! This is one of the top 3 performances of this monumental masterpiece. The concerto has such hair raising bravura that even Richter, Horowitz and Argerich wouldn't go near it. Less than 5 pianist in history can do it justice. Especially the atrociously difficult cadenza in the first movement. Petrov is flawless.
Richter could most definitely play this. However, after hearing the Bolet recording in the 50's, he declared that no other pianist need to record the work again. Of course, Bolet takes the cuts, which makes it less ideal for today's standards. Have you heard the Baloghová recording? If not, I'm quite sure she'll make your short list.
Try the recording by French Michel Beroff - astounding - amazing
22:46 is a funny unintended effect, for a few secs the theme starts in ppp, followed by the actual start of the final mvmt.
Mvmts 2 & 3 too slow for my taste.
Cadenze is ridiculously extensive, like a Third World War. But i love II and especialy III Movement
Prokofiev's music, I think, is enough to make someone wish they were Russian just so they could brag about it.
those first few pages of 8va leaps are surely a poke at mephisto1
yes,, musically maybe the best 2nd ever ,,,
Now that I have heard about 20 performances, unfortunately Mr. Petrov gets bumped from the top 5. This new generation has much more virtuosic technical facility (not necessarily artistic). This is now standard repertoire and competition material. 30 years ago only a handful of pianist would even attempt it and no one expected a pianist to learn this concerto. 40 years before that the Tchaikovsky was considered unplayable by some. Times have changed and I love it:)
What is your top 5 then?
@@bastienpouilles5289 top 5 what? Top five concerti?
@@trblcleft You said "Petrov gets bumped from the top 5", I wanted to know your top 5 then :)
Not true! The best beautiful colorful piano sound players are Really=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Artur Rubinstein Radu Lupu Vladimir Ashkenazy! Todays pianist do not have the sound! More Powerful Louder than Petrov=Mikhail Pletnev Supernova Explosion Power!( Prokofiev piano concerto no 1 by Pletnev!) The Second Loudest pianist was Lazar Berman! The most Genius=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Alexei Lubimov Stanislav Igolinsky! The majority of todays players are so cold and boring! Top 5??
Best performance (especially the cadenza)
23:53 this part would be perfect for a horror movie.
hurm.. i feel as if i've listened to this in film. was it evil dead II, the scene with the dancing corpse of the girlfriend?
Much slower but wonderfully interpreted.
Slower than what? The nucleus of an atom? Gosh... I cannot imagine a faster scherzo...
cubanbach This is the slowest rendition of the third movement I've ever heard. Perhaps he was referring to this?
ah ok perhaps
I guess its becasue he is palying in the really traditional way. I read an article said that after WII, most of the symphonies played fastger and faster than before, even Karajan's Bethophen is 25% faster than some older versions. But prokofiev is a hidden master who do not show himself too often in the public and may also live a old style of life I guess, that's why most of his interpretation sounds slower but more graceful and full. I mean, I prefer hus style for sure, we shall walk slower and wait for our soul.
22:47 ???
おそらくこの音源はカセットテープで、カセットが転写しているため後に来る音が小さく少し聞こえるのだと思います。
Bucci: Damn, thank you for this post. I would have died with joy hearing this in person. Who is conducting?
32:20 Omg
Orchestral work indeed is pretty good as well, any information about the orchestra/conductor? Thanks
28:26 - 9:55- 0:58
I'll 1-up everyone- the GREATEST piano concerto EVER WRITTEN! ps: tied w/ Saint-Saens PC #2 also in Gm.
Try Paisiello piano concerto no 4 Georg Anton Benda Harpsichord concerto b Minor ( we want The piano version) JS Bach Piano Harpsichord Concerto 1052 My favourites Are Chopin piano concerto no 2 Brahms 1-2 Rachmaninov 1 Mozart 22
22:50
21:03
Interprétation fascinante .Quel est l'orchestre et le chef ?
bucciflash ! Well as you attended this concert why don't you indicate the Orchestra and its conductor ??
Agreed!! I want to know this too
6:55
23:10
Intermezzo is REALLY slow, wow
Petrov's mistakes in the first movement almost distracted from his beautiful interpretation. Almost.
Sorry, what mistakes. Can you please point out exactly by bar and note just one mistake where he either played the wrong note or the right note at the wrong time. These are the only objective mistakes. Everything else is subjective
He's not playing 16th notes in the very beginning.
Also about 8:21 to 10:01. A lot of flubbed notes. He seemed to be running out of steam - understandably. How did you not notice that?
At the beginning of what? It's mainly triplets.
In the right hand at the beginning of the first movement. There are 16th notes in the right hand that he decides to give more time.
26:38
no one to mention the orchestra and the conductor ? As usual, several unuseless and sef-focuded comments but not really informative.
In regards to the Prokofiev 2nd concerto; By guys are playing this piece, I mean chicks and dudes as well. Yuja Wang just eats
it up, Like she does with anything she tackles.
Cannot abide Yuja Wang.
gawdy bawdy apocalyptic apoplectic YUMMY
second theme of first movement 20 clicks too fast
Petrov is very good, but his left hand vamp at the very beginning is too prosaic, and doesn't support the right hand melody. The opening should be played "narrante" -- narrating -- meaning telling a story.
Some false notes from 10 '....
What's the point of making piano music so difficult?
the real question is why not?
It wasn't Prokofiev's intention making this piece so difficult. But he knew how he wanted this piece to sound like and the only option to make the piece sound like that was making the piece difficult like hell.
It's a great question. When he wrote it he had not planned to make it difficult, and then as the music started to take shape he realised where it was going he had to follow, even through he was frustrated by what was happening. The piece had a life of it's own and he just had to write out what was coming out. CPE Bach said his father had the same problem.
Does anyone else think Prok should've just skipped the first 2 bars?
Banana Hunter Pro Nope. Only you.
+Banana Hunter Pro He's setting up an important motif that occurs throughout the entire first movement, he probably should keep it in. If you need help finding it elsewhere, listen for it in the orchestra right after the cadenza (piano solo).
Flexyhandz You're absolutely right! When I commented, I'd only listened to this a few times. Now its a year on, I've had time to properly hear the sophistications in the piece and its such an extraordinary work. I suppose it's too great and complex a concerto to judge on a few listens...
The worst version I have listened.
7:00
29:27
7:00
28:25