*Subscribe to my weekly Newsletter(!)* on www.robterhorst.com Instagram: instagram.com/quantified_scientist/ Twitter: @QuantifiedRob 👇Amazon Affiliate links, support the channel!👇 Mi Band 5: geni.us/zBLwxK Of course, only buy it if it makes sense for you!👍
Really nice to see you doing follow-up tests after firmware updates like this. I recently bought a Fitbit Charge 4, and my initial impression was not that good. However, the next day I got a firmware update which made a big impact to my HR readings. I have a pretty low resting HR of around 37-40 which I think confused the Charge , it oftentimes doubled the readings . But after the update it seems to correctly interpret my HR way more often. Have you noticed changes to the Charge 4 lately? I bought mine about 10 days ago and updated it about a week ago.
I've followed Rob's / Quantified Scientist UA-cam Channel for a bit and these videos are so fascinating - I love them! Especially from a big time wearable tech guy these videos and data presented are insightful. Keep up the great work! Can't wait to see the Apple Watch sleep app analysis.
I got one today and in my book it's totally inaccurate. Getting 140 whilst standing still and talking, during a pause when out walking. Standing still making a cup of coffee, apparently it's 100, 80 sitting still. However on my previous tracker, sitting would be approx 50, moving slowly would be about 80, and 140 would be going uphill whilst cycling. Ridiculously inaccurate.
As far as i know, data recording setting is only for gps accuracy, not for HR performance. HR improvement is the result of software upgrade i think. If you have chosen a more settled product such as Vivoactive 4 or Venu (not SQ), you would get better results at first. The problem of Garmin is to release unfinished (not ready) products. You should wait about a year for all of the problems to be solved with upgrades.
Thanks for the video. Could you please do a sleep test with garmin watches. There seems to be a big divide online on whether garmin sleep tracking is accurate.
Very interesting work! I just bought the Sq and have immediately noticed how much better the HR tracking is for cardio work indoors where my previous 645 struggled a lot, especially with HIIT and quick, large HR changes. If I get the chance to compare with a Polar or similar strap I will :-)
So I have a Vivoactive 4s that I got about a week ago, and it seems to be reading very different HR numbers from my fitbit. These higher (about 10 higher during active sessions and VA seems to get stuck where it refuses to go below 130 when the FB is at about 110 when I'm on a recovery.) seasons means my calories burned are much higher. I think they are incorrect. Also, when moving around the house, Garmin says my heart rate spokes and gives me tons of extra burned calories from things like walking to the bathroom and brushing my teeth. When I check my fitbit at the same time, often, my HR is much lower than garmin reports. I have purchased a heart rate band, which is coming Saturday, to check which numbers are more accurate. I think the Fitbit will be but I think it may be a problem and I'll have to contact Garmin about it, like, I don't think this is normal. Fingers crossed that I can figure this out. It's kind of pointless to use this if it's saying I'm burning 4x as many calories as a large adult man when I am a small woman 😂, just from walking up the stairs once.
Hey, I have sleep apnea, so tracking is very important to me. What is the device you'd recommend a person buy to track? You have so many reviews, but it's easy to get lost between all the options on the market.
Im about to buy a smartwatch and my decision right now depends on your tests. Looking forward to see the apple watch tests! Also, do you think the garmin venu would get similar results to the venu sq?
Love your videos, they are the most informative on the whole UA-cam! Are you going to test some WearOS devices as well (like Fossil Gen 5) - to see how accurate they are compared to Apple Watch? Or perhaps Xiaomi's Mi Watch/Mi Watch color sports edition/Mi Watch Revolve (or whatever its name is), which is supposed to come to Europe around Christmas and should be budget friendly (€100) and use firstbeat algorithms (which should be really accurate)?
Im using the garmin for 1 dag now and im so dissapointed. The heartrate in rest and little activity isnt good and jumps often. The sleep function is even worse, had a bad night. It said i sleept almost 8 hours. And also the breathing function doesnt show the real values. Considering to return this :( dont know what to choose now.
Hey Rob. Think you could do a comparison between the Venu Sq and the H10 for a 12-hr daily activities heart rate test? Just doing your daily work and chores. Without selecting an exercise activity, just the watch normal mode. I personally found that the heart rate is very erratic with errors coming in when I'm moving my arms a lot. I'm comparing it to a finger pulse oximeter which is not ideal. Since you have a Polar H10... Thanks.
Have you had the chance to test the new Somnofy device ? They claim it has about 80-90% accuracy compared to PSG. If that is the case then it would be serious competitor to the Dreem since it is no contact device. I will be awaiting on your review before I make a purchase, I can't trust anyone else.
My Venu SQ is always way off. I'm wearing it as recommended, tight, no tattoos etc, and it says 85 while on the bike trainer, when my Garmin HRM chest strap/monitor says 148.
Mines the opposite - brand new today and it's reading 110 whilst standing still, and 70-80 whilst sitting down - my previous tracker would read 80 standing still, and approx 50 when sitting. It actually got worse when doing every second. It's awful tech, complete waste of money.
Smart recording is still available only because Garmin is too lazy to remove it (since they would have to remove the option from newer devices while keeping it in older devices)
I've heard wrist hrm can be more accurate when the watch is worn on the inside of the wrist like a lot of people like to do. Is that true, or does it not really matter?
Garmin is working on switchinh to the first beat sleep tracking.. For now I think it's Fenix 6 only, but it on its way for other of their watches. It recently switched from a vivosmart 4 to a Fenix 6, and the sleep tracking have gone close to useless to fitbit level
Really? I've seen so many mixed reviews about the Firstbeat tracking that I was worried. Does it detect naps yet? I have used fitbit for many many years, but have been wanting to switch to Garmin lately. The sleep tracking is the biggest thing I've heard Garmin fails on, so that's what I've been doing a lot of research on lately.
@@littlered6340 still no nap detection and I would still stick with fitbit if that was the only thing (I've a charge 3). But I do love the stress/body battery and recovery features on garmin
@@ThomasChristensenX I lift weights and fitbit still absolutely refuses to add strength training tracking (sets/reps etc) so that's the big thing for me. I don't WANT to lose sleep options but I think the overall benefits of the including the body battery which REALLY intrigues me, is worth more. It would be nice not to lose the sleep tracking though. Like, I always appreciated fitbit telling me if/when I took a nap, what the quality of it was, and not having to fuss with any of the sleep data as well. I've been slowly realising how important resting is to recovery and just overall well being, but fitbit also wants you to pay for a lot of the new sense features, and I'm more of a one time pay person versus a subscription one. So, it seems like, aside from sleep, Garmin is better for me, but man it's a shame how behind they seem to be. :(
@@littlered6340 I found that the body battery feature, was telling me what I actually wanted to know from the sleep data on fitbit, so I made the jump from charge 3 to the vivosmart 4. But as you say - it's a shame we can't get both. I had hope for a body battery feature on the charge 4 (I think the sense is just to .. ugly). The fenix 6s is big and chunky (and expensive), but it does everything good enough for now. Anybody you can borrow a garmin from and see how the body battery works for you (you need to use it for a while, for it to calibrate)
@@ThomasChristensenX I currently have the charge 4 actually. I basically told my friends (since I tend to be the fit friend) it wasn't worth the upgrade from 3, so to just get the 3 for a lower price if they were debating. I'll ask around, but I think everyone I know is still using fitbit. I found out recently that fitbit has been doing poorly (negatively?) in profits and I think that's why so much of the Sense data is paywalled, which is a shame because I was REALLY excited about that basal body temp but if I have to choose between two 300 dollar devices, the Sense and the Vivoactive 4s, I think the vivoactive might be slightly more in line with my exercise type. Plus, vivoactive is on sale right now because of Christmas. I was hoping the Fenix might go on sale, but no dice 😂. Sense is also not on sale fwiw. But yeah that's a good idea. I'll ask around.
Hi Rob. Your fan from the Philippines. If new and better software updates are made by these gadgets you tested, would it be fair to all if you have it tested at least every 3 months and see how they fair after a year of use. Curious to see their consistency and value for money. Thank you.
That is confusing. We are happy that the accuracy of the Venu is now better. But is it due to changed settings or due to a fimware update? Firmware updates should be communicated better by the manufacturers, if they affect the accuracy. They have an influence on accuracy studies. As on your study. In the middle of your study, there was a firmware update, which disturbs your study, and makes it difficult to interpret. The politics of these firmware updates should be improved. Polar increased for instance the running time of the Verity Sense by a firmware update, which made us retreat from the Verity Sense. If the parameters of a sensor are changed, a new validation paper is necessary. We went back to the Polar OH1, because there is a validation paper with a 3 lead ECG device for the Polar OH1, but not for the Verity Sense. It is a pity that your testing protocols are not published. How long was the test, how long was the speed, etc. so that that it can be reproduced, and that we can get numerical and statistical data, and a ranking. It does not need to be a scientific paper, it could also be a WIKI page to start with. Thank you for your update, regards, Peter Gamma, Meditation Research Institute Switzerland MRIS
Muchas gracias por tanta data ! Me vi practicamente todos tus videos! Estoy a punto de decidirme por los mejores para android Fitbit Charge 5, Garmin sq music, fitbit versa 2 y fitbit sense. Creo que la pelea principal va estar entre el versa 2 y el charge 5. Un abrazo desde Argentina!
Can you upload your content to Vimeo and other "UA-cam" sites, like popular sites in RCEP. Their international translation my be more sophisticated than G crapAI?
Thanks for this update and I've been waiting for it! :). I'm guessing this is firmware 2.30? Also do you think the Venu sq is comparable to the apple watch HR accuracy now or is apple watch just ahead of the curve?
Hi Jag! Yes, that seems to be the firmware version. I still think Apple does better, but I might do a dedicated video on it to make sure it consistently performs well :-D. Cheers!
Hi , I am researcher from india , can you please tell how well this can work for psychological tests ..stress and anxiety ..how accurate will it be to check heart rate variability
*Subscribe to my weekly Newsletter(!)* on www.robterhorst.com
Instagram: instagram.com/quantified_scientist/
Twitter: @QuantifiedRob
👇Amazon Affiliate links, support the channel!👇
Mi Band 5: geni.us/zBLwxK
Of course, only buy it if it makes sense for you!👍
The data sharing from your community is a really great idea and can be very useful in data tracking, the more the data, the better the results!
Thank you for your research!
My pleasure!
I was really looking forward for an update to the Garmin one 😄 Thank you for your hard work!
This review is the one that making me buy the venu sq, looking forward for the sleep tracking test, cheers!
Did you actually buy it?
Love your reviews! Very in depth. Keep up the good work.
Glad you like them!
Really nice to see you doing follow-up tests after firmware updates like this. I recently bought a Fitbit Charge 4, and my initial impression was not that good. However, the next day I got a firmware update which made a big impact to my HR readings. I have a pretty low resting HR of around 37-40 which I think confused the Charge , it oftentimes doubled the readings . But after the update it seems to correctly interpret my HR way more often. Have you noticed changes to the Charge 4 lately? I bought mine about 10 days ago and updated it about a week ago.
Thanks Sebastian! I haven't used my charge 4 so much lately, so I can't really comments. Interesting observation though! Thanks for sharing :-D!
why do you have such low hr?
Man, you're awesome!
Wow, thanks!
Thank you so much,
Looking forward to Huawei Fit sleep tracking accuracy test
I've followed Rob's / Quantified Scientist UA-cam Channel for a bit and these videos are so fascinating - I love them! Especially from a big time wearable tech guy these videos and data presented are insightful. Keep up the great work! Can't wait to see the Apple Watch sleep app analysis.
Seriously you are so awesome to make this kinda scientifically accurate video of smartwatches
I got one today and in my book it's totally inaccurate. Getting 140 whilst standing still and talking, during a pause when out walking. Standing still making a cup of coffee, apparently it's 100, 80 sitting still. However on my previous tracker, sitting would be approx 50, moving slowly would be about 80, and 140 would be going uphill whilst cycling. Ridiculously inaccurate.
The Venu SQ is much better after the update. I'm tempted to buy one
Hi can you do a video for Garmin Venu Sq 2?
Your videos are truly excellent!
As far as i know, data recording setting is only for gps accuracy, not for HR performance. HR improvement is the result of software upgrade i think. If you have chosen a more settled product such as Vivoactive 4 or Venu (not SQ), you would get better results at first. The problem of Garmin is to release unfinished (not ready) products. You should wait about a year for all of the problems to be solved with upgrades.
You deserve more views.
Groeten uit Rotterdam
Great to see this and confirm my purchase of this smartwatch.
Thanks for the video. Could you please do a sleep test with garmin watches. There seems to be a big divide online on whether garmin sleep tracking is accurate.
Well analyzed! 👌
Thanks a lot! Great video as always 👍
Can you please test polar watches? Would love to hear your results and see how accurate it is :)
Very interesting work! I just bought the Sq and have immediately noticed how much better the HR tracking is for cardio work indoors where my previous 645 struggled a lot, especially with HIIT and quick, large HR changes. If I get the chance to compare with a Polar or similar strap I will :-)
Any updates regarding the Polar vs Venu SQ?
Another great video, thank you!
My pleasure!
well done sir :)
Thank you kindly Nils 😊
This always happens with new sensors and Garmin (as well as others). Firmware updates consistently improve the results.
Thanks for the feedback Ed! This is my first Garmin 😊
@@TheQuantifiedScientist You'll be getting tweaked firmware updates for years. Garmin seems to support their products for much longer than most.
Amazing video!!
Thank you!!
Thanks mate, had you planned to test Garmin sleep accuracy? I got a Fenix 6 and a Charge 3... not sure which one has better sleep tracking....
Can you do a review on Amazfit GTS 2 🙏
Please make a similar video when Fitbit sense heart rate accuracy improves as I want to buy that but not buying it because of inaccuracies
The Fitbit sucks man. No reviewer likes it because fitbit forces you to pay for information. Get a Garmin.
So I have a Vivoactive 4s that I got about a week ago, and it seems to be reading very different HR numbers from my fitbit. These higher (about 10 higher during active sessions and VA seems to get stuck where it refuses to go below 130 when the FB is at about 110 when I'm on a recovery.) seasons means my calories burned are much higher. I think they are incorrect.
Also, when moving around the house, Garmin says my heart rate spokes and gives me tons of extra burned calories from things like walking to the bathroom and brushing my teeth. When I check my fitbit at the same time, often, my HR is much lower than garmin reports.
I have purchased a heart rate band, which is coming Saturday, to check which numbers are more accurate. I think the Fitbit will be but I think it may be a problem and I'll have to contact Garmin about it, like, I don't think this is normal.
Fingers crossed that I can figure this out. It's kind of pointless to use this if it's saying I'm burning 4x as many calories as a large adult man when I am a small woman 😂, just from walking up the stairs once.
Great video.
Unrelated to the actual content of the video... what is that watch face on the Venu Sq? It's super clean!
Great update
Hey, I have sleep apnea, so tracking is very important to me. What is the device you'd recommend a person buy to track? You have so many reviews, but it's easy to get lost between all the options on the market.
can't wait for your next video about sleep tracking. just used venu sq for three day👍
Thanks! Hope you enjoy your Venu SQ!
Im about to buy a smartwatch and my decision right now depends on your tests. Looking forward to see the apple watch tests! Also, do you think the garmin venu would get similar results to the venu sq?
Love your videos, they are the most informative on the whole UA-cam!
Are you going to test some WearOS devices as well (like Fossil Gen 5) - to see how accurate they are compared to Apple Watch?
Or perhaps Xiaomi's Mi Watch/Mi Watch color sports edition/Mi Watch Revolve (or whatever its name is), which is supposed to come to Europe around Christmas and should be budget friendly (€100) and use firstbeat algorithms (which should be really accurate)?
Thanks for your video ! Can you test the Garmin Fenix 6 Pro for heart rate, sleep tracking and steps ? 😁
Im using the garmin for 1 dag now and im so dissapointed. The heartrate in rest and little activity isnt good and jumps often. The sleep function is even worse, had a bad night. It said i sleept almost 8 hours. And also the breathing function doesnt show the real values. Considering to return this :( dont know what to choose now.
Same here, nothing accurate!
With this update, would this now be the best wrist based optical sensor for lifting weights?
Hey Rob. Think you could do a comparison between the Venu Sq and the H10 for a 12-hr daily activities heart rate test? Just doing your daily work and chores. Without selecting an exercise activity, just the watch normal mode. I personally found that the heart rate is very erratic with errors coming in when I'm moving my arms a lot. I'm comparing it to a finger pulse oximeter which is not ideal. Since you have a Polar H10... Thanks.
Have you had the chance to test the new Somnofy device ? They claim it has about 80-90% accuracy compared to PSG. If that is the case then it would be serious competitor to the Dreem since it is no contact device. I will be awaiting on your review before I make a purchase, I can't trust anyone else.
My Venu SQ is always way off. I'm wearing it as recommended, tight, no tattoos etc, and it says 85 while on the bike trainer, when my Garmin HRM chest strap/monitor says 148.
Mines the opposite - brand new today and it's reading 110 whilst standing still, and 70-80 whilst sitting down - my previous tracker would read 80 standing still, and approx 50 when sitting. It actually got worse when doing every second. It's awful tech, complete waste of money.
Have you done the original venu? That's the I wear. Will you do a video on that one?
How’s the battery life and overall experience? Im still trying to decide between the venu and the apple watch :/
Out of curiosity was the sleep test you did with the Venu SQ before or after the software update?
Smart recording is still available only because Garmin is too lazy to remove it (since they would have to remove the option from newer devices while keeping it in older devices)
You should give away used watches , I'm sure the subscribers count would raise quickly 🙂 thank you for doing this
Thanks for the video. Which app face have you used which is on video thumbnail?
Excelent video as always! I was wondering if you can get your hands on the amazfit band 5, Wich is like de mi band 5 but with SpO2
Hi Garluis, I am first checking out the Mi Band 5. Maybe I can check the amazfit after :-). Thanks for informing me!
@@TheQuantifiedScientist Excelent news, looking forward to it. Thanks
I've heard wrist hrm can be more accurate when the watch is worn on the inside of the wrist like a lot of people like to do. Is that true, or does it not really matter?
Garmin is working on switchinh to the first beat sleep tracking.. For now I think it's Fenix 6 only, but it on its way for other of their watches. It recently switched from a vivosmart 4 to a Fenix 6, and the sleep tracking have gone close to useless to fitbit level
Really? I've seen so many mixed reviews about the Firstbeat tracking that I was worried. Does it detect naps yet?
I have used fitbit for many many years, but have been wanting to switch to Garmin lately. The sleep tracking is the biggest thing I've heard Garmin fails on, so that's what I've been doing a lot of research on lately.
@@littlered6340 still no nap detection and I would still stick with fitbit if that was the only thing (I've a charge 3). But I do love the stress/body battery and recovery features on garmin
@@ThomasChristensenX I lift weights and fitbit still absolutely refuses to add strength training tracking (sets/reps etc) so that's the big thing for me. I don't WANT to lose sleep options but I think the overall benefits of the including the body battery which REALLY intrigues me, is worth more. It would be nice not to lose the sleep tracking though. Like, I always appreciated fitbit telling me if/when I took a nap, what the quality of it was, and not having to fuss with any of the sleep data as well. I've been slowly realising how important resting is to recovery and just overall well being, but fitbit also wants you to pay for a lot of the new sense features, and I'm more of a one time pay person versus a subscription one. So, it seems like, aside from sleep, Garmin is better for me, but man it's a shame how behind they seem to be. :(
@@littlered6340 I found that the body battery feature, was telling me what I actually wanted to know from the sleep data on fitbit, so I made the jump from charge 3 to the vivosmart 4. But as you say - it's a shame we can't get both. I had hope for a body battery feature on the charge 4 (I think the sense is just to .. ugly). The fenix 6s is big and chunky (and expensive), but it does everything good enough for now. Anybody you can borrow a garmin from and see how the body battery works for you (you need to use it for a while, for it to calibrate)
@@ThomasChristensenX I currently have the charge 4 actually. I basically told my friends (since I tend to be the fit friend) it wasn't worth the upgrade from 3, so to just get the 3 for a lower price if they were debating. I'll ask around, but I think everyone I know is still using fitbit.
I found out recently that fitbit has been doing poorly (negatively?) in profits and I think that's why so much of the Sense data is paywalled, which is a shame because I was REALLY excited about that basal body temp but if I have to choose between two 300 dollar devices, the Sense and the Vivoactive 4s, I think the vivoactive might be slightly more in line with my exercise type.
Plus, vivoactive is on sale right now because of Christmas. I was hoping the Fenix might go on sale, but no dice 😂. Sense is also not on sale fwiw.
But yeah that's a good idea. I'll ask around.
please can you review the latest version of Venue SQ 2 sir ? thank you. 😁
Hi Rob. Your fan from the Philippines.
If new and better software updates are made by these gadgets you tested, would it be fair to all if you have it tested at least every 3 months and see how they fair after a year of use. Curious to see their consistency and value for money. Thank you.
That is confusing. We are happy that the accuracy of the Venu is now better. But is it due to changed settings or due to a fimware update? Firmware updates should be communicated better by the manufacturers, if they affect the accuracy. They have an influence on accuracy studies. As on your study. In the middle of your study, there was a firmware update, which disturbs your study, and makes it difficult to interpret.
The politics of these firmware updates should be improved. Polar increased for instance the running time of the Verity Sense by a firmware update, which made us retreat from the Verity Sense. If the parameters of a sensor are changed, a new validation paper is necessary. We went back to the Polar OH1, because there is a validation paper with a 3 lead ECG device for the Polar OH1, but not for the Verity Sense.
It is a pity that your testing protocols are not published. How long was the test, how long was the speed, etc. so that that it can be reproduced, and that we can get numerical and statistical data, and a ranking. It does not need to be a scientific paper, it could also be a WIKI page to start with.
Thank you for your update, regards, Peter Gamma, Meditation Research Institute Switzerland MRIS
can you please review the activity tracking and sleep tracking for Garmin 945
Muchas gracias por tanta data ! Me vi practicamente todos tus videos! Estoy a punto de decidirme por los mejores para android Fitbit Charge 5, Garmin sq music, fitbit versa 2 y fitbit sense. Creo que la pelea principal va estar entre el versa 2 y el charge 5. Un abrazo desde Argentina!
I wonder what type of exercise did the subscriber do, I will assign the higher accuracy due to fewer fluctuation in the heart rate.
Have you looked at the vivomove style/luxe from Garmin?
What is the watch face you have used in the thumbnail please?
which one would you suggest? GARMIN VENUE or Fitbit Sense??
Please do other brands like polar new models with the new sensors. I also do think the venu HR performs horribly when you are not running. Thanks
Can you upload your content to Vimeo and other "UA-cam" sites, like popular sites in RCEP. Their international translation my be more sophisticated than G crapAI?
How did you get it too look like that when it first turns on
Could you please tell me which is the best available sport smart watch, incl. spo2 function? THANKS
you need more methods of comparisons of those times series
some overall statistics
not sure the point/point comparison can give you insights
What is dial on 1st screens of this video? I can not find him in QI Connect.
Out of all the watch u tested which one do u recommend overall?
How dose it work for cycling? Can u see ur speed all the time as ur cycling and dose it show current or avg speed? Thank you
Still waiting a new video for venu sq
I wonder if it’s also the difference between wrist based vs hrm
What version. Was this? Same for the regular venu?
Can you validate the heart rate accuracy for Tic Watch Pro 3? Thanks
Can you test the Mobvoi TicWatch Pro 3 gps please
Does anyone know which is that watch face in the video? I really liked it and I’m searching to install it. Thank you!
Hi how can i get watch face like yours? It looks awesome!!
Thanks for this update and I've been waiting for it! :). I'm guessing this is firmware 2.30? Also do you think the Venu sq is comparable to the apple watch HR accuracy now or is apple watch just ahead of the curve?
Hi Jag! Yes, that seems to be the firmware version. I still think Apple does better, but I might do a dedicated video on it to make sure it consistently performs well :-D. Cheers!
what is the watchface in the video?
Will it be possible to revisit Fitbit Sense with latest firmware 5.1.1.
Do you have a list of most accurate smart watches ranked? I cant get Apple because i use android, looking to get the best and most accurate watch.
What is the name of that watch faces
Please test Huawei Watch GT2 Pro for sleep, O2, stress, pulse.
How to setup watch face like yours?
Where did you get your Watch Face bro??
Can you test HR & sleep track for amazfit GTS 2?
Hi , I am researcher from india , can you please tell how well this can work for psychological tests ..stress and anxiety ..how accurate will it be to check heart rate variability
Does anyone know what watchface is being ised in the thumbnail? I have digisport and it doesn't fill the entire screen like that...
Hello! Can anyone tell me please, what is the whatch face? Thanks!!
Garmin foreruner 45, 245 and coros pace 2 please 👋👌
What watch face ur using sir
What's the watch face name?
Try the new Polar Vantage V2
My venu sq is not accurate, weight lifting it read so low, like max 110 bpm, with apple watch it was 145 bpm..
Does anyone know what the watch face called on his watch?
Hi Vicky, it is called "contour" by stanislav.bures
please do galaxy watch 3
Hi! What is name of this whach face? Tnx! :)
can i know what name of your watchface. pleasee!!!
Good
can u proof how accurate bip u pro from amazfit
Wow, Pewdiepie reviews watches 🙂
May i know your watchface name ?