Love the modern Turbo182. Nice job Bobby. Just did Florida to Illinois in my 182L. Long-range tanks, speed mods, blue-tooth music, and 15-knot tailwinds. Very solid and stable IFR airplane. Predictable manners. Made it in 5.5 hours.
I trained on a 172 and when I got in a 182 it was like getting in a Cadillac. They look so similar but are so different. Very smooth solid ride. An old 182 is better than a new 172.
Clyde Cessna - I got in a few Hours Training in the C-182 during my PPL, but Did a large Portion of my Renting, post Licence, in the 182! Before long, I had more hours in it, than my Instructors! With the ability to Go Fast, or Slow, to a wider usable Airspeed Range, over the 172, it offers a LOT of Versatility! Normal fuel giving a normal cruise endurance of about 6 Hours, but can be slowed and Leaned, to take it all the way out to 12 Hours Endurance, on my Pilot Operating Handbook numbers, if I recall correctly!
I love the Skylane RG. I took my CFI check ride in one rented out of St. Pete back in the 1990s. I had transitioned from a long history of C-152 and C-172, then did all my CFI practice in a C-177RG then took the ride in the C-182RG with just an hour of transition time, military had me moving a lot so had to change planes due to availability. This is just a comfortable, beautiful plane to fly. Great VFR and IFR platform, feels stable in everything it does.
I think they modified the cowl and put the bigger lycoming in (although the lycoming make the same horsepower as the older Continental) starting with the S series in the mid '90's. Most older 182's are naturally aspirated and generally cruise at about 130 ktas give or take a couple of knots and maybe do 135-140 ktas at full power.
@@glibsonoran I don't think the turbo makes it faster necessarily, just easier to develop power at altitude. So maybe that _is_ faster? Certainly, though, the TIO-540 is far more powerful than the IO-470 and -520s that later 20th-century 182s came with.
@@AnsonChappell Yes aircraft piston engines generally use turbochargers to maintain sea-level performance up to a certain "critical altitude". But being able to produce sea-level power in thin air at 12,000 feet makes you much faster than you could ever go at a lower altitude and much faster than a naturally aspirated engine that might be only producing 50% rated power at that altitude.
In the late 70's and early 80's I was a Propjet Marketing Tech Rep (425's and 441's) with Cessna in Wichita and flew a lot of T182's and TR182's. The 182 is a very nice and forgiving airplane, but back then you really had to watch the manifold pressure to avoid over boosting it.
The most amazing Cessna I have flown in is the 210 with Allison gas turbine power plant. I first saw one in the late 80's when it was touring Australia to show off it's abilities. The plane was like a rocket ship.
Bobby - great video and I do enjoy the Van Bortel aircraft you have featured. I probably will never be in the market for a new model Cessna, but it is always interesting to see those newer Cessnas. In regard to Van Bortel, don't let the haters deter you. Van Bortels has alot of fans and satisfied customers. That dealership reminds me of Cirrus - pilots either love or hate them (Cirrus and / or Van Bortel)! Again, I will probably never own a Cirrus or buy an airplane from Van Bortels, but neither one bothers me if that is what you like. I love my Commander 114B but that airplane is not for everyone either. Personally, I would like to see a late model or even better a new 206 from Van Bortels featured.
That stall was cool! I've heard of aircraft that "get on the back side of the power curve" and can't recover unless they go nose down, but it seemed like that 182 was able to climb right back over it!
Great video, really enjoyed the commentary. Quick story: friend of mine in FL (retired) has a fixed gear 182 and close friend of his has a one with retractable gear. They do a lot of local flying and on a one hour flight, when the retractable is touching down, the fixed gear is calling pattern entry. My point is, I would never own a retractable gear 182.
I co piloted a Cessna Skyhawk. My brother was a licensed pilot! We used the mountain in Princeton as a guide! Mount Wachussett is it's name. We flew to Wolfboro New Hampshire and met in Limerick Me.
I owned a 1974 182. It was a magic carpet. Good days, now history! You can carry four and all their luggage, a real go anywhere aircraft, paying attention to density.
I went to Trade-a-Plane (the place where dreams go to die ((actually, that's Controller, but I digress))) and saw a 2017 version of this beauty for (ouch) $499,000. As awesome as this plane is, I think (for my budget) I need to settle for a nice old Cardinal RG and update the avionics.
I fly a 182 RG without all that fancy stuff. 6 pack gauges, no turbo, 2 blade propeller, no a/c, etc. Pretty primitive and basic. But I wouldn't have it any other way. My instructor said a turbo knocks 2-300 hours off a tbo If he's right, I can certainly do without one.
Still doesn’t climb like the IO550 Texas Skyways 182P that I used to fly. With Robinson Stol kit that plane would climb at over 1000’fpm thru 10000’ with a full load of skydivers. Apparently the engine dyno tested at 335hp.
Nice airplane but it sounded like there was a lot of valve noise. Maybe just the way the camera picks up sound. I'll stick with my experimental thank you...205 knots @ 14 gph. The 182 has got me on short unimproved runway performance though.
Great video, even without the tail camera. I've been watching Van Bortel for about a year. The only thing I don't like is you have to pry prices out of them. That being said, I've been in contact with one of employees there this week, talking about a Cessna Turbo 182...
@@FlyingDoodles I am not there this second. Just starting the process as well as paying off the last of my bills. When I'm ready, I will reach out! Thanks for the interest!
@Flying Doodles I'd invite you to come experience my aircraft N521LW but its only got room for one! Happy flying and I cant stall N521LW just isnt possible as i can maintain 0 AS granted im losing Altitude fairly quickly.
Rate of climb has nothing to do with the stall. It’s all about airspeed. You can be using full throttle and stall the plane. Those are called accelerated stalls and you practice those in your primary training. They really should have done clearing turns, before executing the stall.
Something didn't look right on the passenger side of the empennage around the middle of the N number. I'm taking my time choosing (these videos help) but the turbo 182 is in the running. So are a lot of other aircraft. Van Bortel always seems to have nice aircraft. I wish they advertised their prices. They aren't on my list of places to buy from for that reason.
The model might have been around since 1956 but a lot has changed since then, right? Not sure how relevant it is if someone has worked on an original model, for example. Anyway, nice plane.
Love the modern Turbo182. Nice job Bobby. Just did Florida to Illinois in my 182L. Long-range tanks, speed mods, blue-tooth music, and 15-knot tailwinds. Very solid and stable IFR airplane. Predictable manners. Made it in 5.5 hours.
whats your cruise speed and gallon per hour?
I trained on a 172 and when I got in a 182 it was like getting in a Cadillac. They look so similar but are so different. Very smooth solid ride. An old 182 is better than a new 172.
any 182 is better than a 172, its like going from a flimsy beer can to a solid battleship.
Clyde Cessna - I got in a few Hours Training in the C-182 during my PPL, but Did a large Portion of my Renting, post Licence, in the 182! Before long, I had more hours in it, than my Instructors!
With the ability to Go Fast, or Slow, to a wider usable Airspeed Range, over the 172, it offers a LOT of Versatility!
Normal fuel giving a normal cruise endurance of about 6 Hours, but can be slowed and Leaned, to take it all the way out to 12 Hours Endurance, on my Pilot Operating Handbook numbers, if I recall correctly!
An old 172 is better than a new 172 to me, I just like the light agile feel of the old birds.
@@dsSpitfiremk4 The new ones fly like tanks.
by far no comparision
These vids are making me want to fulfill my dream of becoming a pilot.
Do it, you wont regret it!
take that discovery flight and you'll be hooked! I've got my first lesson coming up this Saturday and cannot wait! Do it while you can!
Me too.
Do it.
Did u do it?
I love the Skylane RG. I took my CFI check ride in one rented out of St. Pete back in the 1990s. I had transitioned from a long history of C-152 and C-172, then did all my CFI practice in a C-177RG then took the ride in the C-182RG with just an hour of transition time, military had me moving a lot so had to change planes due to availability. This is just a comfortable, beautiful plane to fly. Great VFR and IFR platform, feels stable in everything it does.
I was lucky to get a 182 RG turbo . At 10,500 that puppy trued at 200 MPH ,
Wow, can't beat that!
I have always loved the 182 such an icon and this one in particular is beautiful.
Most beautiful bird in the air , best money I've ever spent ,
I didn't realize a 182 could get those speeds. I guess the turbo really helps. The plane looked really nice inside. Nice video.
I think they modified the cowl and put the bigger lycoming in (although the lycoming make the same horsepower as the older Continental) starting with the S series in the mid '90's. Most older 182's are naturally aspirated and generally cruise at about 130 ktas give or take a couple of knots and maybe do 135-140 ktas at full power.
@@glibsonoran I don't think the turbo makes it faster necessarily, just easier to develop power at altitude. So maybe that _is_ faster? Certainly, though, the TIO-540 is far more powerful than the IO-470 and -520s that later 20th-century 182s came with.
@@AnsonChappell Yes aircraft piston engines generally use turbochargers to maintain sea-level performance up to a certain "critical altitude". But being able to produce sea-level power in thin air at 12,000 feet makes you much faster than you could ever go at a lower altitude and much faster than a naturally aspirated engine that might be only producing 50% rated power at that altitude.
In the late 70's and early 80's I was a Propjet Marketing Tech Rep (425's and 441's) with Cessna in Wichita and flew a lot of T182's and TR182's.
The 182 is a very nice and forgiving airplane, but back then you really had to watch the manifold pressure to avoid over boosting it.
Another great video from Flying Doodles! Know little about aviation but learning more and more with each video. Well done, Bobby!
Beautiful! Why sit in the sun and look at the wing when you can sit in the shade and look at the view !
It's called a bonanza and it will get there first
Hammerschlägen M He’s definitely kidding, or perhaps he’s been in the sun up high way to long!! 🥴🤪😂
Neat Stuff except Bonanza’s are outrageously expensive to own. So ya. You’ll get there a little early with a much bigger hole in your pocket 🤣
nice saying bellagio !! :)
Us old dudes don't like to climb up a ladder to fuel it.
For folks familiar with Ford pickup trucks, it sounds like the Cessna 182 is like an F-250, while the 172 is an F-150.
The most amazing Cessna I have flown in is the 210 with Allison gas turbine power plant. I first saw one in the late 80's when it was touring Australia to show off it's abilities. The plane was like a rocket ship.
That Bose headset sounds crystal clear. Excellent video
I was just there in Arlington. Looks like a great place to fly.
great video again Bobby! I don't understand much about flying but you keep surprising me and I learn allot 🛩🐩🐩🍻
Bobby - great video and I do enjoy the Van Bortel aircraft you have featured. I probably will never be in the market for a new model Cessna, but it is always interesting to see those newer Cessnas. In regard to Van Bortel, don't let the haters deter you. Van Bortels has alot of fans and satisfied customers. That dealership reminds me of Cirrus - pilots either love or hate them (Cirrus and / or Van Bortel)! Again, I will probably never own a Cirrus or buy an airplane from Van Bortels, but neither one bothers me if that is what you like. I love my Commander 114B but that airplane is not for everyone either. Personally, I would like to see a late model or even better a new 206 from Van Bortels featured.
This aircraft is byfar THE BEST Cessna GA Aircraft ever produced on the planet! If I would hit the Lotto this surely would be my first purchase!!!!!
I normally fly a 172 and I have sat in a 182,You can really feel the wider difference.
That stall was cool! I've heard of aircraft that "get on the back side of the power curve" and can't recover unless they go nose down, but it seemed like that 182 was able to climb right back over it!
Great video, really enjoyed the commentary. Quick story: friend of mine in FL (retired) has a fixed gear 182 and close friend of his has a one with retractable gear. They do a lot of local flying and on a one hour flight, when the retractable is touching down, the fixed gear is calling pattern entry. My point is, I would never own a retractable gear 182.
I'd recommend taking both planes on a 5 hour or longer flight. That's where the RG really shines.
What a beautiful plane ❤️
The C182 does some pretty incredible things with STOL mods. An extremely capable back country family airplane with the mods.
Beautiful 182 ! TKS !
Okay, now I want one. Nice airplane!
Thanks Randall.
By Far the Best Engine Cessna has used.
What are your favorite cruise settings in T182T?
My 24/2300 - 13-13.4 GPH
I co piloted a Cessna Skyhawk. My brother was a licensed pilot! We used the mountain in Princeton as a guide! Mount Wachussett is it's name. We flew to Wolfboro New Hampshire and met in Limerick Me.
I owned a 1974 182. It was a magic carpet. Good days, now history! You can carry four and all their luggage, a real go anywhere aircraft, paying attention to density.
A similar video on a 206 would be great.
Here you are!
ua-cam.com/video/7qjxN4sypOk/v-deo.html
I want to make 'G1000 in my C182'-type money. GOALS!
Am interested to understand the hourly operational cost (USD) of a 182 (fixed gear)? thanks for any guidance you might be able to provide.
Sweet plane and video. 👍🏼👍🏼
Vintage 70's and 80's? Now I really feel old! Damn, kids! The best 182 is a straight tailed 1955!
How much are one of the older turbos, like say a late 90's plane?
Those with low hours go between $100-250k
My Dream Plane!
Flew 33q, a 182 skylane, was a great little plane. Wish it had the rg, but still had great performance.
Thanks for sharing! Nice video and plane
Skypilot_ just found your channel really like it enjoy watching all the birds you fly in way to go
8:50 - DAT TURBO WIND UP!!!
The 182 has never been a rocket but the trade off for useful load, ease of handling and comfort are worth it.
Nice plane, I want one!!! Your videos are always so fun and uplifting - well done.
Can you squeeze more UA-cam ads in it please?
1 nice 182...4Sure !
That is looking so good
My all around favorite aircraft is the cessna 182, sexy looking bird to my eye..
They have some nice stuff up there.
I went to Trade-a-Plane (the place where dreams go to die ((actually, that's Controller, but I digress))) and saw a 2017 version of this beauty for (ouch) $499,000. As awesome as this plane is, I think (for my budget) I need to settle for a nice old Cardinal RG and update the avionics.
Haha so true!
I've never flown in a small plane but still love these videos. Hopefully i will get the chance to fly any one day
My dream aircraft. I’m learning now in the 172 with the navIII package. I hope they can be affordable for the average income pilots...
Randall in all your flying in Cessna aircraft how often have you witnessed any water in your sump cup during your preflights?
Robert Skovill, only twice that I can remember.
I fly a 182 RG without all that fancy stuff. 6 pack gauges, no turbo, 2 blade propeller, no a/c, etc. Pretty primitive and basic. But I wouldn't have it any other way. My instructor said a turbo knocks 2-300 hours off a tbo If he's right, I can certainly do without one.
Luv ur flying channel, Bobby! 2 kool! 😎
Keep on Dreaming!
8:52 that turbo sounds cool
I would like to own one someday
You should have compared the time to climb of a normally aspirated engine to 12,000 feet compared to a turbocharged Cessna 182. That is what sells.
Ah Van Bortel... keeper of all the planes I’ll never have! Lol
Me too, I can dream
Boa tarde meu amigo Donizete Bragança Paulista SP. Brasil
Love my 182! 1305 useful load. The newer ones are a lot more bloated
That's a nice plane is session
why TIO-540 and not a CD-265? CD-265 has 2400hrs or 12 years TBO, is much lighter, smaller displacement and has JET-A1?
Where and whats the name of the co-pilots headset cabel? Because those are not the standard bose A20! 🧐🧐🧐
Very nice bird
Great Video!
Still doesn’t climb like the IO550 Texas Skyways 182P that I used to fly. With Robinson Stol kit that plane would climb at over 1000’fpm thru 10000’ with a full load of skydivers. Apparently the engine dyno tested at 335hp.
with speed tracker you should add engine/fuel tracking,
Are landings designed so if you were to lose power, you would have enough altitude to make to the airport?
Yes and no, you practice that as a student pilot but depends on what you are doing.... short or soft field or normal landing
You should throw some bush planes in there...
I want one!
I was wondering about the view over the glareshield...could you guys see straight ahead ok?
Great view, out front and above, straight ahead. You adjust your seat so that you’re high enough to look over the instrument panel.
Starts nice for an injected Lycoming.
Like he said, a Skylane can get up and go!
Why do the alarm sounds during the stall tests always sound like they’re from a 1970s washing machine
Nice airplane but it sounded like there was a lot of valve noise. Maybe just the way the camera picks up sound. I'll stick with my experimental thank you...205 knots @ 14 gph. The 182 has got me on short unimproved runway performance though.
Excellent video and aircraft.
Great video, even without the tail camera. I've been watching Van Bortel for about a year. The only thing I don't like is you have to pry prices out of them. That being said, I've been in contact with one of employees there this week, talking about a Cessna Turbo 182...
Are you looking to buy an airplane? I would like to film someone going through that process bobby@sailingdoodles.com
@@FlyingDoodles I am not there this second. Just starting the process as well as paying off the last of my bills. When I'm ready, I will reach out! Thanks for the interest!
Are they good training aircraft for a personal private license?
@Flying Doodles I'd invite you to come experience my aircraft N521LW but its only got room for one! Happy flying and I cant stall N521LW just isnt possible as i can maintain 0 AS granted im losing Altitude fairly quickly.
For the inspiring pilot in future its good idea
That stall warning came in despite your positive rate of climb that wasn't to steep, why is that?
Rate of climb has nothing to do with the stall. It’s all about airspeed. You can be using full throttle and stall the plane. Those are called accelerated stalls and you practice those in your primary training. They really should have done clearing turns, before executing the stall.
Is Cessna 182 T a real 4 adult seater plane...???
🔝🆙 Beautiful!! 💪✈️💫⚡
I used to haul skydivers in 1956 182A's. How they've changed....
Something didn't look right on the passenger side of the empennage around the middle of the N number.
I'm taking my time choosing (these videos help) but the turbo 182 is in the running. So are a lot of other aircraft. Van Bortel always seems to have nice aircraft. I wish they advertised their prices. They aren't on my list of places to buy from for that reason.
Price??
It's is likely to be around $500k for this vintage with low hours and super clean.
One day I’ll buy one..
The model might have been around since 1956 but a lot has changed since then, right? Not sure how relevant it is if someone has worked on an original model, for example. Anyway, nice plane.
Trying to decide between the 206 and 185 so if you run into either pls post!
Nice. And things like that.
Does it have constant speed prop
How do you like the Bose Quietcomfort headphones + add-on Mic as a replacement for the traditional ANR headset?
Not bad. Way cheaper than the aviation specific headset
Great video guys. Loved it. (Why would anyone reply thumbs down?)
Did the landing aircraft say “copy that” to a cleared to land instruction? Whew.
Nice bird
Good video. Keep them coming 👍
Older airplanes didn’t have shoulder harnesses because they figured if you hit the ground……..
thinking of buying one soon
2020 cessna 182 turbo is $715,000. Whoa