Relativistic Kinetic Energy Derivation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @roqayahsalim7025
    @roqayahsalim7025 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much جزاك الله خيرًا يارب في الدنيا والآخرة you made it so much easier ❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @Snoopies622
    @Snoopies622 6 років тому +6

    But how do you arrive at the equation for relativistic momentum?

  • @JamesPortmann
    @JamesPortmann 8 років тому +4

    Really really good. Follwing your playlist on this topic as revision before my finals. Helps a lot. Awesome work man! :)

  • @ruphz
    @ruphz 7 років тому +2

    A cookie to whoever can explain the process in between steps 4 and 5!

    • @victorhugomuzi
      @victorhugomuzi 7 років тому +1

      dont think in terms of 'rules' in 'calculus' but instead analyse step by step by drawing a graph of the process

  • @madspihl
    @madspihl 4 роки тому

    Oh the beauty of that little algebraic hint with the form of your factor of 1 in step 4. I had 2 different textbooks and a number of useless online sources at hand but they all conveniently skipped all the algebra so I ended up with a result of my integration which turned out to be correct - but not until I understood this neat little algebraic manipulation neded to simplify my expression for K.
    So there I was, having done the (for me) more interesting but challenging conceptual and integral parts but I got stuck for an hour or more because I couldn't find the right algreba party trick. THANKS! :)

  • @jasimmathsandphysics
    @jasimmathsandphysics Рік тому

    Very nice I love deriving equations and this gave me satisfaction learning it’s origin. Why is the total energy then K+mc^2? I’m about to start 2nd year of my undergrad but I would really love to know the logic behind it. Thanks

  • @MariMari-fi2gp
    @MariMari-fi2gp 5 років тому

    tq sir. my doubt is clarified from u r video

  • @jormasahikainen9887
    @jormasahikainen9887 10 років тому +6

    I dont really understand part 3. Id like to know how to solve the integral.

    • @anupamsharma7330
      @anupamsharma7330 9 років тому

      +Jorma Sähikäinen integral and derivative (d) cancel each other.

    • @gracebranch2355
      @gracebranch2355 8 років тому +3

      Substitute u = 1 - v^2/c^2 and work from there.

  • @AslamKhan-ky8pg
    @AslamKhan-ky8pg 7 років тому

    I understand it very well, thanks

  • @fidrewe99
    @fidrewe99 6 років тому +2

    Why can you, if you've got dp/dt*dx, choose to derive x with respect to time instead of p?

    • @ozcam666
      @ozcam666 3 роки тому

      this is physics maths, it helps to not be too thorough

    • @fidrewe99
      @fidrewe99 3 роки тому

      @Diego Marra yes and that's my problem. How can he do that? It's a derivative, not a multiplication, so he changes what to derive.

    • @fidrewe99
      @fidrewe99 3 роки тому

      @@ozcam666 Yes, but you have to know exactly what you are allowed to do and what would violate the math.

    • @ozcam666
      @ozcam666 3 роки тому

      @@fidrewe99 yeah, but in this case dp/dt is not a derivative, instead it can be thought of as Δp/Δt, and as such, physical quantities. From this, it’s not in violation to rearrange. Additionally, in this context, an integral is not an anti derivative, but instead a sum of a continuous function over a continuous domain

    • @fidrewe99
      @fidrewe99 3 роки тому

      @@ozcam666 Thanks, makes sense

  • @davidcai4473
    @davidcai4473 5 років тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @Jarrod_C
    @Jarrod_C 6 років тому +2

    You never really explained how the negative became a positive. What happened?

    • @filmlegend3831
      @filmlegend3831 3 місяці тому

      Use calculus methods to find the integral, which has a negative sign

  • @rishabhmahajan3294
    @rishabhmahajan3294 3 роки тому

    nice

  • @abhishekmeena5916
    @abhishekmeena5916 3 роки тому

    👍🏻👍🏻

  • @Debjit625
    @Debjit625 9 років тому

    didn't understood the part 3

  • @Duraputer
    @Duraputer 5 років тому +1

    why does he seem so angry or annoyed.

  • @password6975
    @password6975 6 років тому

    U da boss

  • @JustNow42
    @JustNow42 2 роки тому

    It is Maxwell not Einstein.

  • @mhlanganofreedom1292
    @mhlanganofreedom1292 6 років тому

    from the 5th equation, where does the minus mv^2 comes from

  • @AslamKhan-ky8pg
    @AslamKhan-ky8pg 7 років тому +1

    sir, you waste my time