She's been on before, and the reporter at the time equally got their nose pressed to the facts. Either they forgot about her or thought they could one-up/contain her this time?
@@freedahlogic8368 I actually thought he was fairly impartial to begin with but then he became do desperate to dispute anything that painted Israel positively, he was almost interrogating her but she handled it brilliantly as always.
@@nhhek1110099 Unfortunately the minority seem to be the loudest at the moment and some businesses and events like London Pride are either pandering to threats of violence from the mobs by excluding Jewish participation or getting vandalized like Barclays and McDonalds who now need police as security in some cities like Manchester. Sinisterly on Saturdays. The police seem to watch and record events but no action has been taken to prosecute anyone or stop the marches as far as I'm aware . i hate to be so negative but it isn't good.
He tries to ambush her with an unrelated incident and as soon as she addresses it, he starts to talk over her then says "but you're here to talk about the law" and not "what happened on Sunday". Disgusting, but it is the BBC. But Natasha shot down all of his gotchas, as usual. How embarrassing for them.
Thought I'd give the BBC another shot at redemption, hoping they might surprise me and air some proven facts and not pushing already debunked conclusions/opinions as usual... boy was I wrong! This was not an interview - more like a rigid monologue spewing off an autocue with the occasional pause for someone else to try and start a conversation in. 😤 ChatGPT could do a better job!.. See you later BBC
I agree. The journalist initially asked about an incident, but when her response contained some corrections to the fake news, he admonished her to speak about legal matters. I think the BBC, as a news agency, is really making a poor showing here and gives the impression of being biased.
It isn't just Natasha that they won't let finish an answer. The other day, I watched an interview of an IDF spokesperson by someone surnamed O'Headbra. O'Headbra did the same thing, interrupting as soon as the answer to a question began to be something he didn't want the viewers to hear.
His poor little neural circuits were frying just trying to keep up with understanding Natasha Hausdorff's clarity. Poor little soul, Ham*s won't be paying him his bonus
If you had the choice to hear only one person in this conflict, my vote would be for Natasha. She is great at delivering a calm and intellectual answer that is not riddled with complexities that loses the point. Always clears up any misunderstandings and is overall just respectful to everyone. These are the people worth listening to.
❤ how clearly Natasha explains the law in spite of being bombarded by random questions and then being told she can't answer it because she us here to, "talk about the law". Don't ask questions you don't want to hear the answers to.
The BBC ideologues love to cut short guest responses in their feeble attempts to pass off their editorial views as news. Just another flavor of Al Jazeera propaganda. All "questions" are in fact rhetorical, and the sole purpose of the guests is to take criticism without an opportunity for defense. Natasha holds her own as always. She's truly amazing.
Can the BBC talk about it's fine for Egypt to close it's side of the border to aid and not help refugees from Gaza and the media and protestors are silent??? It's bizarre.
The Egyptian wall is fortified and much larger. They don’t want anybody crossing over at all. Palestinians got more aid than a small country consumes. Enough. Why is to Israel’s responsibility what happens to the Palestinians when nobody else gives a hoot including Hamas.
obviously, this new recognition of Palestine also includes current Jordanian (and Syrian?) territory. No-one seems to care what they think. Maybe they've already agreed to hand it over?
Once again, Ms Hausdorff has given a brilliant explanation of the issues being discussed; once again, Christian Fraser has constantly interrupted her while she's attempting to explain these issues.
If they can't get anyone with at least half a brain as an interviewer why should the BBC be given the time of day??? This guy was an absolute buffoon!!!
Very good replies by Natasha despite (at times) continued distraction-type interruptions (unfortunately, as usual!) by the interviewer, who also put undue time pressure on her replies; it appeared that the interviewer simply wished to put an anti Israeli message out, without actually listening to the responses.
He seemed eager to interrupt her before she could even get a thought out there. Very rude indeed. Glad she insisted. She's so polite. Yet tough as nails when she has to be. Very impressed!
"You're here to talk about the law" and when she attempts to go into detail "just quickly". She managed to get her points across anyway because she is very very smart. How she keeps her cool is a total mystery.
When hammas took israelis hostages. Muslim says they are heroes. But when israelis fight back. Muslim says genocide. The real problem is in islam teaching..
When the reporter tries to misrepresent the context for the number of aid trucks by using a comparative figure of ALL border traffic before the conflict, ms. Hausdorff instantly picks up this crucial difference and shuts him down. Well done! how often would that kind of factual error just go without correction in most of the media reporting!
He thought he could throw so much crap st her and she would be overwhelmed but no he found himself lacking, Natasha goes in focussed and comes out clear. Good for her.
Yeah. Will you not interrupt her with irrelevant points n then stop her to tell her why she's there, when she's actually trying to answer your question. Please.
I like it how he said, "but the same number of trucks were going into Gaza before the war", and she quickly retorted, "except those carried building materials" (for Hama$ tunnels,).
I have watched a few interviews with Natasha and in all cases the interviewer interrupts her and doesn’t let her finish her points. Same here. Don’t know how she keeps so calm.
It doesn't state or imply that, what it does say is that Israel must take precautions to ensure civilian casualties are minimised ... Israel is taking precautions but hamas keeps on placing war material within civilian/ refugee areas, secondary explosions and rounds cooking off can be heard in the video footage of the aftermath. As usual the health ministry is quick to inform us of the deaths but still doesn't differentiate between civilians and combatants .
@@kodi1969 Interesting how Israel is the only country in the world held to that impossible standard, especially since Hamas hides in hospitals, schools, etc... I wonder why? Oh, right: JEWS.
Dear Mr Fraser, What is the point of your interview, when it is clear your only purpose is to mislead the public. Did you really become a journalist to do that? The BBC used to be respected worldwide. Not any more. And you clearly do not wish to raise the standard.
They are all now hell bent on totally trashing that former respect along with EVERYTHING once respected as "British". Basic IDENTITY politics = DESTROY any ACTUAL Identity, and sell back some hollow shell of a costume to be worn, by empty, soulless, vaccuous idiots, as if "identity" is just something tinselly you buy in a shop on a frivolous whim
He is rude and has already asked his next question before allowing her to complete her answer. We have to remember that the BBC has a reputation to keep up. Well Done BBC you are acting as yiu always do! We are still waiting to see the Balen report that you buried!!!!
At a recent US Congress hearing, witnesses stated Hamas are taking some of the Humanitarian aid for themselves and imposing a 16% tax on all humanitarian aid. The secondary explosions which Natasha Hausdorff mentioned during this interview was completely ignored by the BBC presenter. It would appear maybe, Hamas was stockpiling their ammunition within or around the the Rafah camp, it would not be the first reported event where they have used the people of Palestine as a human shield. But the BBC presenter simply and quickly brushed that aside.
That woman needs to run for British PM. She is unflappable and presents herself, as well as the subject she is speaking of, with remarkable clarity and purpose.
I just love this woman. She puts the BBC in its place each time she's on. Frankly surprised they have back! Her knowledge and understanding of the facts is remarkable.
He didn’t want to talk about the strike on Sunday, although he introduced the subject, because Natasha was correcting him on what had actually happened which indicates a Hamas arms dump right next to the civillian safe zone which changes the narrative he was trying to convey.
The referenced event is a clear outcome of the human-shield strategy used by Hamas. This is a tragedy that just waits to happen because Hamas commanders not only hide among civilians, but also store ammunition in designated sheltered zones. In this case, the secondary explosions feeding the fire and the intercepted phone conversations provide clear evidence for Hamas’s successful human-shield strategy, which seeks to amplify Gazan’ casualties, and thereby shift public opinion against Israel. It is also notable that the BBC interviewer is twisting the facts and even cites casualty numbers which exceed by several folds the numbers reported by Hamas.
The BBC … the UK’s greatest embarrassment. This interviewer, much like ALL BBC interviewers & journalists are completely out of their depth with Natasha Hausdorff. This is WAR, NO cease fire!
![Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See - CTMU [Full Version; Timestamps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9miVG2xT5jY/mqdefault.jpg)
I bet they won’t ask her back,she is far more intelligent and informed than the interviewer
Exactly 💯 I 👍 agree
She's been on before, and the reporter at the time equally got their nose pressed to the facts. Either they forgot about her or thought they could one-up/contain her this time?
@@13Psycho13 he just kept cutting her off. They think they have gotcha questions. They don’t. They have silothink.
@@freedahlogic8368 I actually thought he was fairly impartial to begin with but then he became do desperate to dispute anything that painted Israel positively, he was almost interrogating her but she handled it brilliantly as always.
They wanted that iranian professor instead
Thank you, brilliant Natasha, heroically standing against evil, lies and hatred.
The amazing Natasha Hausdorff. Thank you Natasha for all that you are doing, the sane world owes you a debt of gratitude.
As ever Natasha is in complete command of the facts. Brilliantly prepared.
And just generally rather wonderful.
Natasha Hausdorff has made many valauble points but of cource the BBC do not want the truth, only headlines and viewers. I stand with Israel.
Thanks. Natasha is a treasure 😍
yup
I hope the British see through this vile veil. The BBC headlines make me fear for the lives of Jews everywhere.
@@nhhek1110099 Unfortunately the minority seem to be the loudest at the moment and some businesses and events like London Pride are either pandering to threats of violence from the mobs by excluding Jewish participation or getting vandalized like Barclays and McDonalds who now need police as security in some cities like Manchester. Sinisterly on Saturdays. The police seem to watch and record events but no action has been taken to prosecute anyone or stop the marches as far as I'm aware . i hate to be so negative but it isn't good.
He tries to ambush her with an unrelated incident and as soon as she addresses it, he starts to talk over her then says "but you're here to talk about the law" and not "what happened on Sunday". Disgusting, but it is the BBC. But Natasha shot down all of his gotchas, as usual. How embarrassing for them.
Thought I'd give the BBC another shot at redemption, hoping they might surprise me and air some proven facts and not pushing already debunked conclusions/opinions as usual... boy was I wrong! This was not an interview - more like a rigid monologue spewing off an autocue with the occasional pause for someone else to try and start a conversation in. 😤 ChatGPT could do a better job!.. See you later BBC
I agree. The journalist initially asked about an incident, but when her response contained some corrections to the fake news, he admonished her to speak about legal matters. I think the BBC, as a news agency, is really making a poor showing here and gives the impression of being biased.
👏🏻
It was he himself who started the talk about what had happened.
@@philipskalla4312but if she knows what she’s talking about, then let’s talk about something else. We need to get her somehow
Typical journalism from BBC.
No, not journalism more like left-wing opinion(s)! 🇮🇱🇬🇧🇮🇱🇬🇧
Not journalism, BBC activism.
Ms. Hausdorff burned your britches bud. She knows what she’s talking about-more than I can say for you. Do your home work.
Wow . She destroyed all his talking points
BBC guy blown away by facts... no surprise.
but what about that hospital that was blown up by Israel...oh. wait a minute
BBC guy = Interrupter guy
Natasha Hausdorff is a treasure. I can hardly believe he let finish her last points there. Vital points.
Natasha 🙌🙌🙌 schooling the journalists
Thank you so much, Natasha! Always clear and calm.
Nobody lets Natasha finish what she has to say because it's not what they want to hear.
It isn't just Natasha that they won't let finish an answer. The other day, I watched an interview of an IDF spokesperson by someone surnamed O'Headbra. O'Headbra did the same thing, interrupting as soon as the answer to a question began to be something he didn't want the viewers to hear.
BBC in Britain, ABC in Australia all these left wing media outlets are the same.
Because she's a windage.
Rude ..rude..rude..you stop the lady from stating the facts. Bbc👎
Just read this after my comment so must be true ❤ outrageous 😮
Idiot could not get Natasha off quick enough.
That's because the media prefers a "Don't confuse us with the facts" approach to the topic.
We have to keep in mind that not only is Christian Fraser biased, but all these legal concepts are way too complicated for him to comprehend.
He doesn't come across as very bright that's for sure!
He doesn't want to comprehend.
His poor little neural circuits were frying just trying to keep up with understanding Natasha Hausdorff's clarity. Poor little soul, Ham*s won't be paying him his bonus
I don’t agree. I think he understands perfectly well. It appears that he is pursuing an agenda (whether it’s his or BBC - unknown).
As they are for many people.
If you had the choice to hear only one person in this conflict, my vote would be for Natasha. She is great at delivering a calm and intellectual answer that is not riddled with complexities that loses the point. Always clears up any misunderstandings and is overall just respectful to everyone. These are the people worth listening to.
❤ how clearly Natasha explains the law in spite of being bombarded by random questions and then being told she can't answer it because she us here to, "talk about the law". Don't ask questions you don't want to hear the answers to.
Tell him to shut up
The BBC ideologues love to cut short guest responses in their feeble attempts to pass off their editorial views as news. Just another flavor of Al Jazeera propaganda. All "questions" are in fact rhetorical, and the sole purpose of the guests is to take criticism without an opportunity for defense. Natasha holds her own as always. She's truly amazing.
The ICJ seems to have no demands at all about the activities of Hamas who are 100% responsible for the war.
In this latest, they ordered H to unconditionally release the hostages. Of course no-one mentions or worries about that.
@@chriscoetzer It was not an order but a call.
This guy tried hard to dominate the conversation with accusation after accusation. Ms Hausdorf sent him packing.
Can the BBC talk about it's fine for Egypt to close it's side of the border to aid and not help refugees from Gaza and the media and protestors are silent??? It's bizarre.
They don't want to hurt the feelings of the dear Egyptians
The Egyptian wall is fortified and much larger. They don’t want anybody crossing over at all. Palestinians got more aid than a small country consumes. Enough. Why is to Israel’s responsibility what happens to the Palestinians when nobody else gives a hoot including Hamas.
Egypt signed a treaty to take refugees from Gaza years ago! they just ignore their own responsibility.
Strange no mention , we all know why
,
obviously, this new recognition of Palestine also includes current Jordanian (and Syrian?) territory. No-one seems to care what they think. Maybe they've already agreed to hand it over?
Once again, Ms Hausdorff has given a brilliant explanation of the issues being discussed; once again, Christian Fraser has constantly interrupted her while she's attempting to explain these issues.
He, and all in the Biased Broadcasting Comintern are not in the LEAST bit interested in understanding of TRUTH
God has blessed you Israel with Natasha Hausdorff.
Your so professional Natasha thanks
He asked about the strike and then said you're not here to talk about that when she replied 😂 what a small lump of butter
If they can't get anyone with at least half a brain as an interviewer why should the BBC be given the time of day??? This guy was an absolute buffoon!!!
I hate when they interrupt their guest, just when they're about to make a profound point.
Exactly I find it infuriating.
God bless and protect Israel, from a South African supporter 🇮🇱🇿🇦
❤🇮🇱🇿🇦🤲..Durban South Africa
Thank you
I believe it is the russians and iranians pulling the strings on South Africans doing, which are actually pushing hamas terrorists agenda
What a brilliant legal scholar and incredible lady. Thank you Natasha
Very good replies by Natasha despite (at times) continued distraction-type interruptions (unfortunately, as usual!) by the interviewer, who also put undue time pressure on her replies; it appeared that the interviewer simply wished to put an anti Israeli message out, without actually listening to the responses.
Well that IS the bbc's main aim ! ! ! Smear all decent people and push their vile twisted narrative
On such an important and complicated issue, it's absolutely absurd how biased the BBC is.
Christian Fraser should ask about the hostages
Excellent Natasha - well done for putting the biased in favour of Hamas BBC straight!!!!!!!
He seemed eager to interrupt her before she could even get a thought out there. Very rude indeed. Glad she insisted. She's so polite. Yet tough as nails when she has to be. Very impressed!
"You're here to talk about the law" and when she attempts to go into detail "just quickly". She managed to get her points across anyway because she is very very smart. How she keeps her cool is a total mystery.
She has practice :) she’s used to this, probably anticipate it and prepared for it
Well said, Natasha 👏 🇬🇧
Can he talk about the rockets fired at Tel Aviv from this area a couple of hours before?
Well said again, Natasha. You set this reporter right on track albeit he is not bright enough to know that.
Love it!!!! Let’s not mix apples & oranges!!!
She's been a genuine eye opener for me.
Every time shes on the BBC, she shows them how wrong they always are
Natasha is a superb advocate: precise, concise and knowledgeable.
This lady Natasha is highly objective in her analysis and presentation. She is highly logical.
Natasha you have the patience of Job, these media mouthpieces routinely interrupt and change course without letting you complete an answer.
How does this guy not know medical facilities have been set up in the safe zones?.
He believes EVERYTHING his Ham*s masters tell him. He probably even believes Farfour is REAL
He knows. This is BBC after all.
Medical facilities lose their protective status if used for combat as per Geneva convention.
@meandme8049 oh yes I realise but I'm talking about the field hospitals next to the safe Zones
When hammas took israelis hostages. Muslim says they are heroes.
But when israelis fight back. Muslim says genocide.
The real problem is in islam teaching..
Muslims hate to be challenged on anything
I love this lady! Stay strong and keep teaching!!!
Nice job Natasha , he entered the interview believing he was up to sparring with you ,
He learned as so many others have !
When the reporter tries to misrepresent the context for the number of aid trucks by using a comparative figure of ALL border traffic before the conflict, ms. Hausdorff instantly picks up this crucial difference and shuts him down. Well done! how often would that kind of factual error just go without correction in most of the media reporting!
Thank you Natasha…brilliant stamina and factual presentation
He thought he could throw so much crap st her and she would be overwhelmed but no he found himself lacking, Natasha goes in focussed and comes out clear. Good for her.
Natasha, thank you for standing for Israel!
Thank you, Natasha, it's brilliant
Great robust response as always Natasha!
Well done for correcting that incredibly rude interviewer.
Yeah. Will you not interrupt her with irrelevant points n then stop her to tell her why she's there, when she's actually trying to answer your question. Please.
Tell Hamas to stop fighting and release the hostages
I like it how he said, "but the same number of trucks were going into Gaza before the war", and she quickly retorted, "except those carried building materials" (for Hama$ tunnels,).
Ms Hausdorff with clarity corrects a political narrative of the BBC.
I have watched a few interviews with Natasha and in all cases the interviewer interrupts her and doesn’t let her finish her points. Same here. Don’t know how she keeps so calm.
Cheers to the work you voluntarily do Natasha.
Natasha destroys people with facts and logic
Despite the disgraceful BBC journalism, Natasha Hausdorff brilliantly delivers the material and the point, as usual. Thank you!
would love to see a debate between the two barristers, Natasha and Amal Clooney.....I bet that Ms. Hausdorff would win it easily
AC probably will win on the designer clothes and Ray Bans for representing refugees stakes.
in other words, the ICC holds to the belief that Israel has no right to defend itself... what a shock
"Something something something.... dark side"
-ICC
It doesn't state or imply that, what it does say is that Israel must take precautions to ensure civilian casualties are minimised ... Israel is taking precautions but hamas keeps on placing war material within civilian/ refugee areas, secondary explosions and rounds cooking off can be heard in the video footage of the aftermath. As usual the health ministry is quick to inform us of the deaths but still doesn't differentiate between civilians and combatants .
@@kodi1969 Interesting how Israel is the only country in the world held to that impossible standard, especially since Hamas hides in hospitals, schools, etc... I wonder why? Oh, right: JEWS.
@@kodi1969 Hama$ fights in civvies and even in women's dresses sometimes, so apparently they're all "uninvolved" and "innocent" civilians.
@@kodi1969 it basically says "Israel must obey the law" doh!!
Dear Mr Fraser,
What is the point of your interview, when it is clear your only purpose is to mislead the public. Did you really become a journalist to do that? The BBC used to be respected worldwide. Not any more. And you clearly do not wish to raise the standard.
They are all now hell bent on totally trashing that former respect along with EVERYTHING once respected as "British". Basic IDENTITY politics = DESTROY any ACTUAL Identity, and sell back some hollow shell of a costume to be worn, by empty, soulless, vaccuous idiots, as if "identity" is just something tinselly you buy in a shop on a frivolous whim
Down with the BBC
He is rude and has already asked his next question before allowing her to complete her answer. We have to remember that the BBC has a reputation to keep up. Well Done BBC you are acting as yiu always do! We are still waiting to see the Balen report that you buried!!!!
Natasha Hausdorff is my hero
Natasha is awesome as always ❤
Pure pleasure to hear her speaking
Natasha always expresses herself with such intelligence and clarity...even with the rude interruptions from the presenter.
At a recent US Congress hearing, witnesses stated Hamas are taking some of the Humanitarian aid for themselves and imposing a 16% tax on all humanitarian aid.
The secondary explosions which Natasha Hausdorff mentioned during this interview was completely ignored by the BBC presenter.
It would appear maybe, Hamas was stockpiling their ammunition within or around the the Rafah camp, it would not be the first reported event where they have used the people of Palestine as a human shield. But the BBC presenter simply and quickly brushed that aside.
Love love LOVE Natasha. X
Natasha you speak so much sense this guy could learn a lot from you
This woman is so intelligent and clued up that she wipes the floor with anyone that takes her on .
Natasha is brilliant as usual!
Thank you for publishing
That woman needs to run for British PM. She is unflappable and presents herself, as well as the subject she is speaking of, with remarkable clarity and purpose.
Keep up the good work Natasha.
That was impressive.
Piss poor interviewer constantly talking over the guest.
Go Israel, 💯🇳🇿🇳🇿🇳🇿
He got owned by facts!
Natasha is brilliant and it is a joy to watch her demolish the BS of her opponents.
I just love this woman. She puts the BBC in its place each time she's on. Frankly surprised they have back! Her knowledge and understanding of the facts is remarkable.
why do they stop her in the middle of her speaking?
Because the answer is not to their liking
Well done Natasha!
He didn’t want to talk about the strike on Sunday, although he introduced the subject, because Natasha was correcting him on what had actually happened which indicates a Hamas arms dump right next to the civillian safe zone which changes the narrative he was trying to convey.
come on Host, when U invite an Expert..U 🤐 !! ...let the Expert talk...!!
Natasha is smart, informed, and pretty to boot, so a powerful voice countering the pro Hamas nonsense. We need more like her...
The referenced event is a clear outcome of the human-shield strategy used by Hamas. This is a tragedy that just waits to happen because Hamas commanders not only hide among civilians, but also store ammunition in designated sheltered zones. In this case, the secondary explosions feeding the fire and the intercepted phone conversations provide clear evidence for Hamas’s successful human-shield strategy, which seeks to amplify Gazan’ casualties, and thereby shift public opinion against Israel.
It is also notable that the BBC interviewer is twisting the facts and even cites casualty numbers which exceed by several folds the numbers reported by Hamas.
Haha he didnt want her to say anything besides the answers he was looking for haha
You’re great. Good talking points. Just need to make more bite sized
The BBC is only after one thing and that is to undermine Isreal.
Nathasha, well spoken! I Admire her calmness and professionalism
The BBC … the UK’s greatest embarrassment. This interviewer, much like ALL BBC interviewers & journalists are completely out of their depth with Natasha Hausdorff. This is WAR, NO cease fire!
The BbC presenter is not listening to this brilliant lawyer
We are watching the wet dream of a Libanese President at the ICJ, in place since february 2024.
Thank you for you.
go Natasha - you are awesome. may God bless you for the work you do.
Good to see the biased broadcasting corporation getting a dose of reality and facts
She’s a legend! 👏🏻👏🏻🙌🏻