Life on Our Planet | Bringing 65 Prehistoric Creatures to Life | Netflix
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 жов 2024
- Life on Our Planet's visual effects team designed the nature documentary's terror bird, cave lion, mastodon, and dozens of other prehistoric creatures by working with hundreds of scientists over five years. Informed by the fossil record, biomechanics, and more data sources, filmmakers explain how they brought life to scary and stunning CGI animals.
Interviewees:
Dan Tapster (Series Producer, Silverback Films)
Jonathan Privett (VFX Supervisor, ILM)
Dr. Tom Fletcher (Palaeontologist and Senior Researcher, Silverback Films)
Jamie McPherson (VFX Director of Photography)
Barny Revill (Director and Producer, Silverback Films)
Sophie Lanfear (Producer and Director, Silverback Films)
Nick Shoolingin-Jordan (Producer and Director, Silverback Films)
Ben Lambert (Asset Supervisor, ILM)
Sian Warren (Creature Technical Director, ILM)
Phil Gifford (Effects Technical Director, ILM)
Louise Hussey (Executive Producer, ILM)
Hannah Smith (Texture Artist, ILM)
Subscribe: bit.ly/3a9PwvP
About Netflix:
Netflix is one of the world's leading entertainment services with over 247 million paid memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, films and games across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can play, pause and resume watching as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, and can change their plans at any time.
Life on Our Planet | Bringing 65 Prehistoric Creatures to Life | Netflix
/ @netflixbehindthestreams
Life's extraordinary journey to conquer, adapt and survive on Earth across billions of years comes alive in this groundbreaking nature docuseries.
2:23 That... is the last thing we should be hearing about a documentary. Looking forward to seeing them talk about the Allosaurus, it's gonna be a treat 💀
" That doesn't look very scary does it? ". Oh bloody hell, they said it again. If they do this for Allosaurus it's game over for this documentary
Worse, they ended up making the terror bird look pathetic anyways (and perpetuated another inaccuracy in the process).
@bkjeong4302 and then the terrible design they did for the unnamed pterosaur, and the inaccurate look for erythrosuchus :(
"It didnt look scary".... I get that excuse for Jurassic Park but this is supposed to be a documentary
Also hat was their excuse for changing the colors of Anchiornis, one of the few fossil animals that we do know the exact coloration of?
In all fairness while not the right attitude for a documentary we don't really have evidence for their color so if they wanna make a cooler design so long as its logical that's fair game
@@kennethsatria6607eccept you and i know that they didn't just messed up with the color, becauae that like of thinking doesn’t just stop at color alone.
Lol Netflix has balls to post this
Especially the "that doesn't look scary" part 😂
I hate that they keep saying the word ‘Scary’ for every creature. You don’t have make something look scary for it to be scary. Prehistoric Planet did that really well, even though Hatzegopteryx didn’t look scary to the general public, the production team made it scary because of how they used it. That’s called GOOD STORY WRITING! There was this one woman on UA-cam where she said the feathers on dinosaurs look stupid.
165 scientists and they discarded the evidence💀
The scientists probably tried their best, but the producers and various other filmmakers have the final say on what gets put on screen.
@@PaleoEdits thats sad
Ademas ignoraron otras clases como los rauisuchios unos crocodilomorphos no crocodilios, los avicefalos o otras criaturas que vivieron en los momentos que se muestran.
Las plumas de las manos de los paraviano estan en el lado incorecto y la posicion de estas en el deinonychus esta debajo de su cuerpo cuando en realida estarian plegados contra el cuerpo.
drive.google.com/file/d/17lS_e9jZwKjxEY96z4O11CWVuAg0SCA5/view?usp=drivesdk
Aqui una imagen del concenso que se tiene hoy y la representacion de las alas del deinonychus en la serie, que es resto del diseño esta bien el mejor, el anchiornis el color se asemeja aun asi incorrecto sus plumas de las alas estan desordenadas al correcto según un estudio.
What's the point of making the terror bird scary if you're just going to show it as a Smilodon meal (something inaccurate that has been debunked long ago) 😂
Someone messed up on the research department
Tbh, The LOOP Mammoths and the shot of the gorgeous scenery behind them gave me 10,000 B.C. vibes. So magnificent and majestic.
"The level of effort that went in to making out Vfx creatures was unbelievable" causally reuse Jurassic world dinosaurs
I don't think they did that, else the dinos would be looking far more retro
@@kennethsatria6607 they did.
@@blueemerald2759no they didn’t they inspired their designs from Jurassic Park/World the designs aren’t retro
Scientists identified the color of a few dinosaurs like Sinosauropterix, Psitaccosaurus, Anichiornis and Microraptor to name a few
its not on prehistoric planets level but not every single bit of it is inaccurate, and well im not trying to excuse the outdated or nonsensical things that are in this documentary at times, I don't think its worth hating on, I think supporting netflix for trying while pointing out they could do better is the way to go. I hate to see that they were planning to do another similar show and perhaps do it even better in terms of accuracy but decide not too cause everyone has decided to just hate on this for not being to a T what mark witton would sign off on.
Now all we need is a reboot of Prehistoric Park in the future (with Nigel Marven returning).
...and you just took the Jurassic world Allosaurus...
It would be a great moment to see the prehistoric creatures coming together.Unity is strength and power!
Please make a Permian life on our planet. The creatures here are strange while also diverse.
The CGI in this is so far behind Prehistoric Planet. Such a gap in quality, not to mention the lack of scientific accuracy. It comes across in this feature too... laughing at the names of dinosaurs and trying to make them look scary instead of actually appreciating them as flesh and blood animals. Pathetic
Nah man the CGI and designs are good and relatively accurate, its literally everything else that's lacking on top of the prehistory segments being so short, i'd just call it a bit half baked
They got a lower budget then prehistoric planet but the cgi is still really good
What the hell is wrong with this comment section?! Sure this show had elements that could have been a lot better, but so many of you are blowing this waaay out of proportion and are mad at the show for the wrong reasons.
It doesn't just have issues with animal design. The narration lies and misrepresents certain beats in Earth history, and how evolution works. The ordovician mass-extinction event is a prime example of this.
I wish their were more prehistoric species then modern species and their was a peace about the future of the animal kingdom
At the rate of extinction,plants,birds,animals in last 100 yrs ,it won't be long for your wish⏲️
0:03 You doomed the Great Allosaurus 😐
CGI could be better, compared to prehistoric planet, but that probably had a lot more $ to throw at it, plus Morgan Freeman likely ate up a lot of the budget.
I liked the terror bird segment, but the cave lion/mammoth bit felt off; unless that juvenile was sickly, something that large wouldn't get pulled down by lions that quickly, nor would it apparently give up and give up the ghost so quickly, as we've seen how long it takes modern lions to take out smaller and less durable African elephants
Prehistoric planet is from apple they got a lot of money but the cgi of life on our planet is still really good
Oh, that was a fantastic show. This and Prehistoric Planet set a very good precedent on (the highly feared abbreviation atm) CGI. These artists have got a lot more to give, I included in the near future at least.
This show is full of inaccuracies...
@@necrogenisisif you don't like it so too bad for you drama queen
@@LuisRivera-jk1vo Chill out mate, it's just that the show is terrible at communicating the sciences correctly and just keeps pushing outdated ideas as fact. Its a lot deeper than disliking some of the designs. And for the record, I don't think the _T. rex_ design is terrible.
In any case, documentaries are supposed to be educational and this does a terrible job.
@@necrogenisis for me I enjoy that documentary by myself and I love it and I don't have any problems with the creature designs well some of them depends on my own judgement
but I still don't have anything negative thoughts yet In general but for me this documentary Is not terrible we are not same issues honestly
@@necrogenisis also don't chill out on me ok if you think The documentary Is terrible hahaha wrong I don't want negative thoughts on it tsk tsk tsk tsk I'm not like you young man For ****! Sake! Ugh I Hate Drama Queens Out There scientific accuracies blah blah blah blah blah blah nobody knows in general About nobody seen The Prehistoric Creatures In fresh alive in the reality 😒
I loved the shape of the cave lions, the mammoths, the saber teeth. and the bird of terror, my ice age favorites. Netflix is fantastic, congratulations, thank you Netflix.
great interviews
The terror bird beak does not look right, It bothers me. A miner change would be to have a longer lower jaw it's a bit small. I mean no hate, It just bothers me.
The Gorgonopsid is my favorite animal in Life on our Planet👍👍👍
Now Netflix Have Their own Prehistoric Creatures For The First Time.
I thought the design of some animals in this show a bit off because it was done by ILM. Turns out it was flawed from the higher-ups.
No Woolly Rhinoceros.
It’s like bbc walking with dinosaurs prehistoric beasts and prehistoric planet . I hope Netflix does dinosaurs again and this time Kenneth Branagh narrates again . I hope Apple TV does prehistoric planet 3 soon next year .
In this behind the scenes of Life on Our Planet, I love the designs of these dinosaurs and prehistoric creatures and they look realistic.
Just like Walking with Dinosaurs
This comparison is like comparing a turd with chocolate
Watered down by a lot but I appreciate the CGI work and designs, just not the science that gets outdated and how short these segments are. Its like biting more than they could chew.
honestly, after having such a groundbreaking masterpiece in prehistoric planet, this one looks a bit cute. yes VFX is amazing, but let's be real... the dinos does too many unnecessary hollywood growls and screeches. NOTHING tops prehistoric planet's realism in movement and gestures. i was hoping this one could challenge it, but nah.... way off. hats off to mr. freeman though, brilliant narration as always.
What is that animal at 0:14?
The rhino one ? Megaceros
Im not sure if the allosaurus or erythosuchus was worse
Showing a smilodon hunt a terror bird isn't inaccurate, same way showing an oviraptor eat an egg isn't inaccurate either, overcorrection is a serious problem with paleonthology right now
oh sure buddy.
But they way they used it is like showing a lion being killed by a couple of leopards and claiming leopards are superior.
@@fishyfishyfishy500akabs8 The difference in size is nowhere near the same as with a lion and a leopard plus it was 2 smilodon plus the terror bird was distracted. I agree the scene could have been done better, but as i said, people now act like it would be impossible for a terror bird to ever die to a smilodon
Debieron haber agregado a otras criaturas prehistoricas como el dimetrodon, el edaphosaurus, el apatosaurus, el stegosaurus, el brachiosaurus, el ceratosaurus, el megaloceros y el parasaurolophus
Very disappointing to go into this 8 episode, 1 hour each episodes and discover that 70 percent of every episode is drawn out long shots of landscapes riddled with modern animal footage and morgan freeman nonstop talking which takes away from moments that would greatly benefit the short duration of time we actually get with our prehistoric animals.
And you guys call this a documentary lmao
Even Jurassic Park has more documentary value than this show.
People are way to critical I really like the cgi and most of the designs in this documentary
key word: documentary
The best Creature 😂👍
*INOSTRANCEVIA* 💕🇮🇳
0:37 oh come on all the pronouncination their all easy also of several prehistoric Animals
Wow, It's Perfect!!!🦖🦣🤩😉👍
I don't get all the people hyperfixating on the "it doesn't look scary" part, they only changed the color (which is open for interpretation) the thing still looks exacty like a terror bird
No me gusto como representaron al mamut lanudo sin su joroba y cabeza sobresaliente y su sonido no me parece adecuado y parece raro, parece mas a un mastodonte y dicen que es el ancestro de los elefantes pero en realidad eran sus primos.
Depicting Prehistory life for educational purposes doesn't need to look scary,its quite obvious why the documentary wasn't that good and you better never work to another one again
❤
Yeah, you can do as much research as you want but if you don't potray prehistoric animals realistically, with modern animal behaviour as a reference, then YOU ARE NOT POTRAYING ANIMALS.
Я не мать бан получите. Докажите сначала
speak normai ianguage. i'm not Arabic
Most fun to research: Big Bang-web 🔭... evolution in Cambrian period,and the mystery of camouflage in humans,animals,birds⏲️