Anunnaki Evidence from Across the Globe with Michael Forest at Contactatsea 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 вер 2024
  • Recorded at the Contact at Sea event on Royal Caribbean Ovation of the Seas September 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @alieninfoo
    @alieninfoo 3 дні тому

    Brilliant presentation Michael 👏🏻

  • @Art-_-life
    @Art-_-life 3 дні тому

    I'm surprised you have so few subscribers! You're truly a great find for me. I barely stumbled upon your channel, but it's been a game changer. I've been interested in this topic for a long time, even from Russia, but what you show and talk about just blows my mind!

    • @aliencarvings
      @aliencarvings  3 дні тому

      @@Art-_-life i used TikTok primarily because I liked doing lives, I only recently started doing this on UA-cam. TikTok kinda censored me.

  • @Jalartifact
    @Jalartifact 4 дні тому

    Nicely Done ♧

  • @cabezadehoja5143
    @cabezadehoja5143 4 дні тому

    🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @robtennapel78
    @robtennapel78 2 дні тому

    This is incredible-I really feel it’s real. I’d love to learn more about what the artifacts reveal. Perhaps a video with a more in-depth explanation could be a great next step!

  • @yaaxiik
    @yaaxiik 4 дні тому

    🌞

  • @MauricioMacias2010
    @MauricioMacias2010 3 дні тому

    what type of flash light do you use?

  • @1331423
    @1331423 3 дні тому +1

    Are you grifting or do you genuinely believe this?

    • @aliencarvings
      @aliencarvings  3 дні тому

      @@1331423 I’ve written 3 books on this from a skeptics point of view, however after doing so there are many things highlighted in my presentations here that make me wonder, at the minimum I strive for more research, that’s all,

    • @1331423
      @1331423 3 дні тому +1

      ​​@@aliencarvings it doesn't seem very skeptical or well researched. A few odd facts, lines of texts and objects stripped of any context and strung together by a vague theory about aliens. No alternative possiblities discussed, no limitations of your methods admitted, no previous (serious) research mentioned.
      On your website you claim this is the 'truth', not just that you are pushing for more research. Do you think it's reponsible to be describing such a lazily researched theory as the truth? Even if you are just pushing for more research to be done like you say, the more easily-deluded members will only see the word 'truth' and latch onto that.