How anyone thinks this discussion was adequate is delusional. Harris was so evasive. When she was not lying, she was frightening with her answers and then engaging in word salads.
what the heck is he talking about? my own mother who is voting for her said the interview was “so-so”. This guy was interviewed last week and it’s apparent he’s a Never Trumper.
It’s isn’t spinning, it’s a refusal to answer..EVERY time .David is missing the point - ppl are waiting for her to speak clearly, and directly, they want straight answers from her. Once again, 60 minutes was a lost opportunity for her to let the American ppl know where she stands on policy . She comes across extremely disingenuous, deceitful, and manipulative
I agree with Drucker that Kamala's Ukraine answer was a bold commitment to the country. What it was not was any clarity to the American people about the direction of the war. People in the US (and seemingly in Ukraine as well) are looking for an end to the war and her answer gave no indication that an end would come under her tenure.
Maybe a low information voter would be impressed. She was smooth. However, if you analyze her answers you see they’re nonsensical and evade the question. Think Pete Buttagieg: smooth talker, polite response, nonsensical answers
David is wrong that it won't have an effect because he's neglecting context. She has been widely trolled for such word salads, with many wondering if she has a brain at all. So they look with anticipation at this interview to see if she will finally show she's got what it takes, and she clearly didn't
She rarely details what "the plan" is with regard to any issue, although she does frequently refer to "a plan." However, it's like "Hope and Change." What does that even mean? What is the damn PLAN? Spit it out. The fact is, she can't spit it out, either because she doesn't know the plan to address a given issue and cannot provide specific details to ameliorate the negative condition, or if she does know the plan she isn't willing to provide specific details because she's afraid of the potential backlash she could face once the public becomes aware of the details. It's one or the other.
How both candidates answer questions is one thing but the most important aspect of their candidacy is how they will govern and how well they will govern. Trump gives me the world I want to live in. Harris' vision (equity, in particular) is terrifying. Equity translates into forcing one group of people to give their earnings and life savings to another group of people. I'm not rich but I'll definitely be poor under a Harris government.
Drucker trying to search for truth or real information in Harris's answers reminded me of someone. Oh yeah, Kamala Harris! This guy is not up to the usual standards of this podcast. He's as muddy in his remarks as the present VP.
I disagree with Drucker. Her interview was weak sauce. One more example why she’s not ready for primetime. I’d give her a D. And after that many D’s, it begins to permanently damage her campaign.
From the start, Ukraine has been pushed to fight a loosing battle, and the longer this mess is prolonged the worse will be the final outcome for them. End the war that never should have started, and avoid upping the anti in some other area of potential provocation.
I have no idea who David Drucker is....and after watching him here, I'm not interested in finding out.
Tribe
I couldn’t agree more with you! I was going to post the same thought.
AMEN!
You took the words out of my mouth.
What a DUMB bozo he is. And he accepts dumb too. I never want to hear anything from this shill.
I disagree with David Drucker.
How anyone thinks this discussion was adequate is delusional. Harris was so evasive. When she was not lying, she was frightening with her answers and then engaging in word salads.
what the heck is he talking about? my own mother who is voting for her said the interview was “so-so”. This guy was interviewed last week and it’s apparent he’s a Never Trumper.
Agree. He has Trump Derangement Syndrome
David Drucker, what happened to you!? It was AWFUL and YOU KNOW IT! Good grief!
It’s isn’t spinning, it’s a refusal to answer..EVERY time .David is missing the point - ppl are waiting for her to speak clearly, and directly, they want straight answers from her. Once again, 60 minutes was a lost opportunity for her to let the American ppl know where she stands on policy . She comes across extremely disingenuous, deceitful, and manipulative
"Flood the zone" with incompetent interviews and maybe no one will notice.
- David Drucker 🤣
Lil davey is weak and has TDS
Voters are just noticing that she's incompetent.
The Biden administration has been so bad, the best she can do is just give empty platitudes.
David is spinning the shit out of the disaster 60 min interview 😂😂😂😂
@@Anthony-pe5dd absolutely
Lol sure sounds like it 😅😂
Drucker for Kamala. Stupid spin for a stupid woman
Stupid man treating others like they are stupid. Typical Democrat buffoon.
Drucker has to make a bigger pretzel to cover for the Harris pretzel.
I disagree with David. That was a train wreck for Kamala
He has TDS deeply
@@TonyR-u6hmust be financially dependent on her
@@Ks48778 good point
Sorry but I can’t stand Drucker! Left wing loon!
"It's tight, it's close, it's tight, it's close, it's tight it's close. Blah, blah, blah, blah".
I agree with Drucker that Kamala's Ukraine answer was a bold commitment to the country. What it was not was any clarity to the American people about the direction of the war. People in the US (and seemingly in Ukraine as well) are looking for an end to the war and her answer gave no indication that an end would come under her tenure.
Drucker is a Never Trumper.
@@donaldbrent6547 definitely
Come on Hugh been following you for years you can do better than this hack on your show!
Hey Mr. Drucker would you want her to be your children’s grade school teacher?
I couldn’t even get through his first opinion of her “answer” of how they’re going to fix the problem!! Stopped watching it!
People want specifics and she’s not giving it. She’s losing
Is David for real ?
😂😂😂
TDS is real with Lil davey 😂😂😂😂😂
Maybe a low information voter would be impressed. She was smooth. However, if you analyze her answers you see they’re nonsensical and evade the question. Think Pete Buttagieg: smooth talker, polite response, nonsensical answers
When someone starts with "listen" when answering a question means your question wasnt important 😅😂
David is wrong that it won't have an effect because he's neglecting context. She has been widely trolled for such word salads, with many wondering if she has a brain at all. So they look with anticipation at this interview to see if she will finally show she's got what it takes, and she clearly didn't
She rarely details what "the plan" is with regard to any issue, although she does frequently refer to "a plan." However, it's like "Hope and Change." What does that even mean? What is the damn PLAN? Spit it out. The fact is, she can't spit it out, either because she doesn't know the plan to address a given issue and cannot provide specific details to ameliorate the negative condition, or if she does know the plan she isn't willing to provide specific details because she's afraid of the potential backlash she could face once the public becomes aware of the details. It's one or the other.
How both candidates answer questions is one thing but the most important aspect of their candidacy is how they will govern and how well they will govern. Trump gives me the world I want to live in. Harris' vision (equity, in particular) is terrifying. Equity translates into forcing one group of people to give their earnings and life savings to another group of people. I'm not rich but I'll definitely be poor under a Harris government.
Not pristine? How about, not present.
For some reason David Drucker is as indirect with his answers as K. Harris.
Hack!
But she can party, ask Diddy
It shouldn't even be close. She's already a disaster. Imagine giving her total control.
Waste of time to watch this Harris backer.
Reminds me of the story of the king with no clothes on.
David is wrong here by a mile….
Get this guy out of here.
How is this guy senior writer lol
Drucker trying to search for truth or real information in Harris's answers reminded me of someone. Oh yeah, Kamala Harris! This guy is not up to the usual standards of this podcast. He's as muddy in his remarks as the present VP.
Insane take by Drucker
Looks like he had a gun to his head saying she did well
I disagree with Drucker. Her interview was weak sauce. One more example why she’s not ready for primetime. I’d give her a D. And after that many D’s, it begins to permanently damage her campaign.
I’d give her a ‘MINUS F’…..!!
Drucker is just finding lame excuses for her.
This David Drucker is not very sharp. He is using talking points he has heard on propaganda media. He strikes me as somewhat of a dolt.
I read all the comments first, and I'm in concensus. Druker, meh.
This guy is embarrassing. Shilling at its finest.
David dricker is a f wit.😊
Who is this guy? Is he from the Mar?
Liberals: Spin is GOOD! Much better than telling the truth!!!
LOL!
From the start, Ukraine has been pushed to fight a loosing battle, and the longer this mess is prolonged the worse will be the final outcome for them. End the war that never should have started, and avoid upping the anti in some other area of potential provocation.
Where's this guy's family being held?
Classic David Drucker.
Time out: she is drunk
Drucker not usually this obtuse. Not sure where his head is at.
Hugh, when you quote Lincoln you just look foolish. He's nobody to quote.
Lincoln had many good quotes. He was a thoughtful, contemplative person, caught in a very difficult position.
WOW!! Judging by this discussion, David Drucker is a clown! 😆wtf?
❤❤❤
Really? 😂 Ok expert
David Drucker is a fool
I know it is like iregardless but induvial singular points are datum. the group is data
Oh David, come on. You have got to be listening to a different interview….
Hack!