At 17:45, I would say I prefer A, but it's certainly more difficult to process. A few years ago, I had a lot of trouble understanding complex passive sentences like the one in the video, but then I came across Noam Chomsky's transformations from active to passive sentences and vice versa and started transforming them automatically like that in my mind, and now, I don't even consciously transform anything, but I still understand the sentence just fine.
my man killing it, my presentation in linguistics boutta be hella comprehensible, thank you man, deffo subbing and recommending you to my friends and family
Hilpert, Martin. 2021. Information structure. In Bas Aarts, April MacMahon, and Lars Hinrichs (eds.), Handbook of English Linguistics. New York: Wiley, 229-248.
At 17:45, I would say I prefer A, but it's certainly more difficult to process. A few years ago, I had a lot of trouble understanding complex passive sentences like the one in the video, but then I came across Noam Chomsky's transformations from active to passive sentences and vice versa and started transforming them automatically like that in my mind, and now, I don't even consciously transform anything, but I still understand the sentence just fine.
There's really few lectures about linguistics in yt generally but this one is helpful
my man killing it, my presentation in linguistics boutta be hella comprehensible, thank you man, deffo subbing and recommending you to my friends and family
I love your teaching style! Thank you
Thanks for watching!
Hello. I would like to thank you for sharing with us this video.
thank you so much。 you‘re a handsome teacher
This video is so helpful. Thank you!!
Many thanks for your interesting E-lecture
Very clear presentation. Thanks.
thank you so much for this. you're just saving my life haha
thanks a million.
thanks a Million
source?
Hilpert, Martin. 2021. Information structure. In Bas Aarts, April MacMahon, and Lars Hinrichs (eds.), Handbook of English Linguistics. New York: Wiley, 229-248.
@@MartinHilpert cheers mate xx
Linguistic pragmatism rules OK.