From Pregnant Guppy to Beluga XL. The special planes for special cargo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 845

  • @pkscarr
    @pkscarr 4 роки тому +69

    for everyone asking "why didn't they just use an A380?" I went to a talk by Airbus engineers and they directly addressed this question. Basically there were 4 main reasons:
    Cost. A380's are a huge undertaking to build and run. A330 airframes could be bought back off operators to be used as conversion platforms for very little cost (in aircraft terms).
    Complexity. The A330 airframe already has a freighter variant that has passed certification, unlike the A380 at the time they were creating the BelugaXL.
    Airfields. Several of the Airbus facilities simply cannot safely handle A380's landing and taking off, due to space or other ground contraints, and in several of them simply expanding the runway is not an option. They could, however, all handle A330's with relative ease.
    Facilities: One of the design requirements was that the new Belugas should be able to reuse as much of the specialist equipment created for loading and unloading the old Beluga's as possible. This would have made modifying the A380 far more complex.

    • @warehousetechtips
      @warehousetechtips 4 роки тому +3

      Yes and beluga is a flying beast

    • @junrenong8576
      @junrenong8576 Рік тому

      But ultimately building it as a new aircraft is way cheaper than modifying an existing one. From what I understand Airbus evaluated several options, and the only option is to build a totally new aircraft based on the existing A330, just like the BelugaST based on the A300.

  • @Themosquito_
    @Themosquito_ 6 років тому +371

    0:57 the USSR that is "russian" ahead
    nice pun comrade

    • @ioandavies2292
      @ioandavies2292 5 років тому +11

      It's our joke

    • @whippyfc
      @whippyfc 5 років тому +4

      Noob master69 communism

    • @R4de
      @R4de 5 років тому +1

      Electric Whippy capitalism FTW

    • @Optimaloptimus
      @Optimaloptimus 5 років тому +1

      Noob master69 Heck off commie!

    • @DaSwagChamp-49
      @DaSwagChamp-49 5 років тому +5

      The plane is *stalin*

  • @al2123950
    @al2123950 5 років тому +352

    No one:
    Airbus Beluga: 👁 ︶ 👁

    • @kaiserrohan368
      @kaiserrohan368 5 років тому +2

      Lol

    • @WolfPackAlpha-sn2sw
      @WolfPackAlpha-sn2sw 4 роки тому +1

      Y e s

    • @kynnmaster_123
      @kynnmaster_123 3 роки тому

      You mean BELUGA? Lol.. That was the reason why I'm here.

    • @RedTail1-1
      @RedTail1-1 2 місяці тому

      This was written by a full grown adult. Not some little kid. An actual grown man used this meme.

  • @florimond.
    @florimond. 6 років тому +160

    I live in Toulouse and the Beluga XL goes over my house several times a day...

    • @olympique3256
      @olympique3256 5 років тому +48

      That's like living below an aquarium lol

    • @Kni0002
      @Kni0002 5 років тому +10

      Lucky, but annoying?

    • @lolsoos4205
      @lolsoos4205 5 років тому +5

      I live in Hamburg and I see it also like once a day

    • @sickboisadventures
      @sickboisadventures 5 років тому +3

      I see them all the time too! I have the UK plant near me

    • @eddsukk1668
      @eddsukk1668 5 років тому +6

      i always seem them too ,on youtube

  • @cvtt3194
    @cvtt3194 6 років тому +25

    The fact that a 747 can fly with a shuttle strapped to the back always impressed me.

    • @Marco-wz3ff
      @Marco-wz3ff 6 років тому +4

      Its a highly modified 747.

    • @cvtt3194
      @cvtt3194 6 років тому +3

      Marco obviously.

  • @puttington4343
    @puttington4343 6 років тому +359

    *_Super Goopy_*

  • @davidca96
    @davidca96 Рік тому +2

    RIP An-225, such a unique and amazing display of engineering that we can no longer ever see fly again.

  • @jasperfk
    @jasperfk 6 років тому +123

    big bois

  • @unicyclemaster470
    @unicyclemaster470 5 років тому +286

    “These are the 1960s”
    Shows all 1950s cars

    • @WestU.SProductions
      @WestU.SProductions 5 років тому +35

      Lots of cars from the 50s made it to the 60s

    • @tuckertucker6602
      @tuckertucker6602 5 років тому +23

      It’s 2019 and you still see cars from the 2010s and 2000s on the road

    • @WestU.SProductions
      @WestU.SProductions 5 років тому +8

      I see cars from the 50s still driving today.

    • @LuizAlexPhoenix
      @LuizAlexPhoenix 5 років тому +7

      I see horses and people walking, wanna see you top that.

    • @tuckertucker6602
      @tuckertucker6602 5 років тому +3

      I see people walking around, not top THAT

  • @Klenric
    @Klenric 6 років тому +36

    Wow, as an aviation enthusiast there are certain things that bug your mind about these things, but you have explained it well my good sir. Please continue this work so that we all may learn. Cheers.

  • @mabamabam
    @mabamabam 6 років тому +289

    They really should have called it the Airbus Airvan.
    Because a bus carries people but a van carries building supplies.

    • @rougedoge1204
      @rougedoge1204 6 років тому +34

      More like airtruck

    • @totalrandomness4543
      @totalrandomness4543 6 років тому +23

      Rouge Doge No, the Beluga is the Airvan, Beluga XL is Airtruck

    • @BulagBanditMedia
      @BulagBanditMedia 6 років тому +8

      AirTrailer? Air Semi?

    • @albertogutierrez8653
      @albertogutierrez8653 6 років тому +1

      johno Actually, a trailer truck! Just saying. 👍

    • @gerdforster883
      @gerdforster883 6 років тому +13

      Since Airbus is a european company, they would use english and not american vocabulary. So Airlorry, not Airtruck...

  • @Derpsii
    @Derpsii 6 років тому +224

    5:30 *"Super Goopies"*

    • @jandajanda2242
      @jandajanda2242 6 років тому +2

      When i go to the bathroom

    • @basicallyapilot5704
      @basicallyapilot5704 5 років тому +3

      its guppy not goopy

    • @larrysmith6797
      @larrysmith6797 5 років тому

      Care to bet his English is better than your English?

    • @bearinmind50
      @bearinmind50 5 років тому +2

      Larry Smith it is GUPPY since it is named after a fish that when pregnant has the same odd sort of look.

    • @dazwolfgramm6341
      @dazwolfgramm6341 5 років тому

      Accents: *am I a joke to you?*

  • @patchouli_s75
    @patchouli_s75 6 років тому +43

    "the disassembled rocket parts do not need to breathe" 5:12

  • @montyjohnson4741
    @montyjohnson4741 5 років тому +111

    Sing with me now : "If you find a guppy, it rhymes with puppy
    So never call it goopy, 'cause that's just poopy." :)

    • @Texas240
      @Texas240 5 років тому +5

      To be fair, the native Russian speaking narrator has no "uh" sounding letter in his alphabet to compare to English letter "u".
      They do have a sound like "oo" though. I have a Russian friend who mispronounes "truck" as "trook." I guess it's a common mistake and some English sounds are difficult. Just as some Russian letters are very difficult for English speakers, when we have no similar sound.

    • @michaelmace924
      @michaelmace924 5 років тому +2

      Funny, I just said it rhymes with puppy, not poopy.

    • @Texas240
      @Texas240 5 років тому +5

      @@michaelmace924 - my point is that he'll pronounce "puppy" as "poopy" because, since they simply don't have the "uh" sound, it takes a lot of practice and effort for them to not say "the poopy made a poopy".
      Likewise, it would be very difficult for you to say, "ты" correctly. It's a very simple word but we have no English sound for "ы" and everyone you listen to says it slightly differently.
      Either way, it's easier flush to a goopy guppy than clean up after a poopy puppy.

    • @snakeatwar
      @snakeatwar 5 років тому +2

      @@Texas240 I understand your point but he clearly knows how to pronounce the soft u sound. Skyships says 'structure' perfectly fine along with a few other words in this video even. It's just a case of picking the incorrect pronunciation for the u in Guppy. So the rhyme should be helpful.

    • @Texas240
      @Texas240 5 років тому

      @@snakeatwar - fair enough

  • @sidewyndersshed1676
    @sidewyndersshed1676 5 років тому +7

    I worked on an old guppy decades ago, very cool aircraft. It had 4 28 cylinder radial engines, r-4360, (4,360 cubic inch displacement)
    Each engine had 2-50 gallon drums of oil piped to them, on a 3000 mile trip they would use almost all that oil. (400 gallons) and it was not uncommon to blow a cylinder off an engine in flight, and she would barely notice it.
    Definitely a workhorse!
    👍

  • @joecaner
    @joecaner 6 років тому +76

    The Beluga XL is a considerably more elegant aircraft when compared to the Boeing Dreamlifter.
    I especially like its cargo access. Nicely done!

    • @macenichols6676
      @macenichols6676 6 років тому +11

      Joe Caner The 747 dreamlifter is so graceful she's the Queen of the sky's she literally has dream in her name because she fulfills dreams

    • @joecaner
      @joecaner 6 років тому +2

      It sounds dreamy.

    • @CloroxBleach-um4gn
      @CloroxBleach-um4gn 6 років тому +10

      It’s better than the dreamlifter it’s just iconic

    • @CloroxBleach-um4gn
      @CloroxBleach-um4gn 6 років тому +1

      Mace Guy nope

    • @112Ishaan
      @112Ishaan 6 років тому

      Joe Caner I have a plane name in my head named Boeing unlimited It is 100 m far 8 engines 2 on the back wing has 5 levels First cargo 75 m and Passenger Windows! I hope They Will make It

  • @Aeronaut1975
    @Aeronaut1975 6 років тому +389

    It's "Guppy", like "Puppy", not "Goopee"

  • @GuamanianHarmonLoop
    @GuamanianHarmonLoop 3 роки тому +8

    My dad was the last mechanic to work on the original Pregnant Guppy at Van Nuys Airport. Sadly, the aircraft was scrapped. I think my brother has the original manual for the pregnant guppy.

  • @kineticdeath
    @kineticdeath 6 років тому +36

    An-225 is the best. love watching videos of that thing

    • @daanvos194
      @daanvos194 6 років тому

      There is an second in the making

    • @philporter6962
      @philporter6962 6 років тому

      B. I. G. B. O. I

    • @emrefifty5281
      @emrefifty5281 6 років тому

      @@daanvos194 whats its name?

    • @daanvos194
      @daanvos194 6 років тому

      @@emrefifty5281 i have no Idea but it is in storage in ukraine

    • @lzh4950
      @lzh4950 5 років тому

      In my city there was an apartment building whose lift/elevator supposedly had to take 3 months to repair, because the replacement part was claimed to be too large to be air-flown to my city (& thus was shipped by sea instead). I bet they didn't consider the An-225 😏

  • @jacobt1731
    @jacobt1731 6 років тому +9

    16:21, the rail transport system Boeing has in place is still operational to haul 737 fuselages as well as partial fuselages and cabins for all of its wide body aircraft. These parts are transported from Wichita, Kansas to Boeing's plants in both Everett and Renton, Washington. In Everett, the BNSF gets these aircraft parts brought in on trains bound for Seattle, or from local ports hauling specially built containers, then once there are enough rail cars ready to build a train, the trek of the hill is made. The fuselages and associated parts continue on to Seattle and then are brought to Renton I'm assuming either on locals or on special trains that only run from Seattle to Renton. I am not 100% sure though, I may be wrong about certain aspects.

  • @captaincrunch5528
    @captaincrunch5528 6 років тому +80

    just skip the problems and just make a A380 guppy

    • @BulagBanditMedia
      @BulagBanditMedia 6 років тому +5

      Captain Crunch For today’s engines, this would be impossible because of how heavy the A380 already is.

    • @MalteSpieltYT
      @MalteSpieltYT 6 років тому +5

      that would not work, because the A380 has 3 decs, 1 for cargo and 2 for passengers. because of the shape of the A380, you would not be able to fit in more cargo than in the beluga...

    • @boocomban
      @boocomban 6 років тому +5

      @@BulagBanditMedia slap 2 more engine on it done!

    • @VasYevu
      @VasYevu 6 років тому +4

      @@boocomban On a mechanical opinion of this... its gonna be hard, the people might as well design another plane fit for the concept by the time they added in 2 more engines. Due to certain things, they would have to be changed such as the wings holding the weight of them, thrust of the engines would be changed so then calculations of the parts of the plane aerodynamically would have to change.

    • @yamato4169
      @yamato4169 6 років тому +3

      jasun calimag r/wooosh

  • @tnightwolf
    @tnightwolf 4 роки тому +2

    I just can't stop loving a plane like the Beluga!

  • @Exizider
    @Exizider 5 років тому +22

    "because physics are the same everywhere" well, in russia everything is possible and we all should know it by now

    • @rainstormm1
      @rainstormm1 5 років тому +1

      everything is possible when your people are considered expendable

  • @supertekkel1
    @supertekkel1 6 років тому +1

    Excellent! These kind of video's is why I've said goodbye to old fashioned TV.

  • @YoursNKR
    @YoursNKR 6 років тому +3

    This is not just any story,
    This is an epic about the biggest milestone in logistics which has been and will continue to be the backbone of humanity.

  • @GoofieNewfie69
    @GoofieNewfie69 6 років тому +20

    Really funny how people comment on the guppy pronunciation. Learn the commentators language and pronounce all his words properly. hehehe

  • @trash4cash454
    @trash4cash454 6 років тому +115

    Make some about Soviet planes

    • @SkyshipsEng
      @SkyshipsEng  6 років тому +15

      Trash4Cash I will soon

    • @gorizont-plate
      @gorizont-plate 6 років тому

      Trash4Cash
      ты уже на русском смотрел, дурачок. Постоянно на канале скай шипа торчишь.

    • @LGKvideos
      @LGKvideos 6 років тому +4

      In a nutshell, they were all done fast, without a lot of money, had a lot of crashes and the build quality was low. Oh, and they also didn't tell the people about the crashes so they would still fly the planes and Americans would think that the planes are good.

    • @xXx_Oshino_xXx
      @xXx_Oshino_xXx 6 років тому

      Preferably the tu-4

    • @hugegene8010
      @hugegene8010 6 років тому +1

      I am subscribed to both of his channels, Russian and English, he has some amazing content and to be honest his accent just ads something special to all his videos, its just never gets boring.

  • @kolerick
    @kolerick 5 років тому +4

    Beluga XL look like an anime plane... so "cute"... that's a win for me when looking at the other

  • @alexanderboulton2123
    @alexanderboulton2123 3 роки тому +1

    Aw dude, I LOVE the Pragnent Goopy!

  • @somebody5624
    @somebody5624 5 років тому +9

    2040: SO we're going to join 2 planes together but in the middle there will be a giant submarine to hold our new flying submarines

  • @spacebatstuckonearth8888
    @spacebatstuckonearth8888 6 років тому +3

    I enjoyed the video, i didn't noticed it was 20 mins long, until it ended. VERY WELL MADE, KEEP UP THE GOOD JOB !

  • @onefastslimjim
    @onefastslimjim 5 років тому +2

    Living in El Paso, home of the Super Guppy, I can assure you that plane is a glorious piece of machinery 😉

  • @StBonaventure07
    @StBonaventure07 6 років тому +13

    It would be cool to see planes like these converted to civilian carrying planes with large grand staircases and dining rooms. Similar to old ocean liners.

    • @Patrick_AUBRY
      @Patrick_AUBRY 6 років тому

      As it says in this video, it's not doable to pressurate such buddy for structural reasons.

    • @VasYevu
      @VasYevu 6 років тому +2

      Possible, yet with major overhaul on the mechanics.

    • @hugegene8010
      @hugegene8010 6 років тому +2

      Yes, and all the passengers wearing pressurised suits with oxygen masks... such fun.

  • @AngelPerez-dw8ou
    @AngelPerez-dw8ou 6 років тому +1

    I love Boeing more than Airbus. bUT jesus christ that BelungaXL looks so amazing. Airbus planes look so amazing.

  • @goodboid
    @goodboid 6 років тому +8

    By far my favourite aviation channel!

  • @valrabellkeys9867
    @valrabellkeys9867 6 років тому +1

    Awesome video! A lot of work clearly went in to this.

  • @marcelosao2
    @marcelosao2 6 років тому +4

    Wow, what a nice surprise, excellent video. Congratulations.

  • @IANinALTONA
    @IANinALTONA 6 років тому +1

    Nicely done! Good Balance between detailed info and 'easy enough for the average youtube user to understand'.

  • @ghostindamachine
    @ghostindamachine 6 років тому +1

    It has to be said: your writing, research and videography skills are excellent!

  • @3storiesUp
    @3storiesUp 6 років тому +1

    You are the best Sky. Excellent vid as always. Thanks !

  • @Colin_Yote
    @Colin_Yote 6 років тому +23

    Airbus's first plane was concorde but not under the name airbus

    • @noobplayer_23
      @noobplayer_23 6 років тому

      Boob Ross it’s aerospatiale

    • @noobplayer_23
      @noobplayer_23 5 років тому

      Can I die please yep

    • @bandvitromaniaios1307
      @bandvitromaniaios1307 5 років тому +2

      Ibnu Zandra BACHTIAR sure just take the TU-144

    • @Colin_Yote
      @Colin_Yote 5 років тому +1

      @@noobplayer_23 they formed most of there parts into Airbus along with
      Belgium
      Germany
      England
      Spain?
      Portugal?

    • @mohammedrazeenzaeencamil9344
      @mohammedrazeenzaeencamil9344 5 років тому +1

      I thought it was the A300? The Concorde was more of a French-British thing, Airbus is more of a Western European thing

  • @yumphallangthaphal1598
    @yumphallangthaphal1598 6 років тому +6

    Thanks, for the English version. REQUEST"please make this an usual mode for all future updates( Russian version followed by English version ).

  • @kerrycoleman8395
    @kerrycoleman8395 4 роки тому

    Most of these comments are jokes, but seriously, I love your content. It almost documentary quality.

  • @muntashirulhaque5937
    @muntashirulhaque5937 6 років тому +1

    That's a nice wish... Soft landing, fast flying... Liked it 😍

  • @googaagoogaa12345678
    @googaagoogaa12345678 6 років тому +3

    did anybody else hear the techmoan music at 6:33 this was a great video and informative

    • @FireStriker_
      @FireStriker_ 6 років тому

      Yep it’s a bit disorienting lol

  • @oopsididitagainbut2154
    @oopsididitagainbut2154 6 років тому

    Wow, thx for the video!
    I *love* watching animal videos on UA-cam!

  • @FreakinPeanut
    @FreakinPeanut 5 років тому

    What a wonderful video 😊

  • @matthewhickle3006
    @matthewhickle3006 5 років тому +1

    7:28 The additional vertical stabilizers ended up not actually being needed but were added just in case while they were designing the modifications to the plane. With the aerodynamic cone on the back of the shuttle, the main stabilizer still works fine.

  • @squash_boi901
    @squash_boi901 6 років тому +23

    These look like they’d be from Kerbal Space Program

  • @captkay5330
    @captkay5330 5 років тому

    This was fun😀
    Love how you started from the past and came up to the present😀👏

  • @dorpie
    @dorpie 6 років тому +1

    Excellent videos Mr sky. I live in the city where they make wings for the Airbus and the current Belugas fly in and out several times a day. Can't wait to see the XLs next year.

  • @leezinke4351
    @leezinke4351 6 років тому +35

    8:55 how the heck that plane even fly while carrying a space shuttle? 😳

    • @frankgaleon5124
      @frankgaleon5124 6 років тому +15

      The Soviets knew something about aviation)

    • @neutronium9542
      @neutronium9542 6 років тому +32

      Spacecraft are surprisingly light. It would add a ton of drag, limiting speed, but not really it's ability to get off of the ground.

    • @msb3235
      @msb3235 6 років тому +11

      Looking at the spacecraft itself, no wing and even the cockpit were covered (so no glass) means it was totally stripped out thus very lightweight.

    • @AngelPerez-dw8ou
      @AngelPerez-dw8ou 6 років тому +10

      the space shuttles are really light. they do not even have engines. well they do but really small ones that they rarely used. they had no fuel.

    • @redneckrepairs8594
      @redneckrepairs8594 6 років тому +7

      The space shuttle created lift too

  • @parakeetd1866
    @parakeetd1866 5 років тому +1

    *sUpEr gOoPy!!*

  • @VrataVenet
    @VrataVenet 5 років тому

    Great video. Thank you

  • @vissitorsteve
    @vissitorsteve 6 років тому +3

    Anyone commenting here about the mispronunciation of 'Guppy', is, I'm sure, so well spoken with Russian that they would never mispronounce a single Russian word. Give him a break. This video was fascinating and especially informative. I have to admit that I initially found it funny as well, but some other remarks are geared toward simply insulting the narrator.

  • @paul-t-geist4245
    @paul-t-geist4245 2 роки тому +2

    Always look out for the Beluga XL going over, got photos of it during lockdown and with it taking off and landing near Chester it's still low enough to see the "face".

  • @frankgaleon5124
    @frankgaleon5124 6 років тому +2

    Love this story. Good video

  • @juanfernandez2467
    @juanfernandez2467 3 роки тому

    Excellent overview of the history of these unique aircraft

  • @vermas4654
    @vermas4654 3 роки тому

    It's wonderful to see that the super guppy is still in use

  • @stephman4591
    @stephman4591 5 років тому

    Thank you 😊

  • @ToastRunnerHere
    @ToastRunnerHere 6 років тому +2

    And now Sky is in English! The best russian-speaking channel about aviation expands - I love it!

  • @michaelcleveland6397
    @michaelcleveland6397 6 років тому

    And just a pinch of cuteness. Love it.

  • @tnightwolf
    @tnightwolf 4 роки тому +1

    When everyone is looking for that slick design, i always find comfort knowing there's a Beluga out-there, somewhere, "breaking the norm" and making flying just look fun!... yeah we know about ll he specs, but imagine if we just did this simple thing here!... Wouldn't it be fun to just not have the usual "aviation advance performance parameters" and instead just build something for it's intended purpose and have a little fun with the concept while we're at it?

  • @THEfamouspolka
    @THEfamouspolka 5 років тому +6

    "The USSR, who is Russian ahead..."
    Well played sir!

  • @gab4221
    @gab4221 5 років тому +1

    very special planes indeed

  • @breadboi1248
    @breadboi1248 5 років тому +1

    SUPER G O O P Y

  • @PowersDave1966
    @PowersDave1966 6 років тому +1

    By the way I love your channel

  • @craigwall9536
    @craigwall9536 3 роки тому

    Nice photography!

  • @lexustech48
    @lexustech48 6 років тому

    Incredible how much staying power the design architecture of the original Boeing B-29s had. The original B-29, the updated variant B-50, C-97 Stratocruiser, B377 Stratoliner (civilian) and the super guppies!

  • @riadinrisanto4766
    @riadinrisanto4766 6 років тому

    NICE VIDEO!

  • @tomf3150
    @tomf3150 5 років тому

    Beauty isn't the first word that comes to mind for the beluga XL...

  • @crashfinger
    @crashfinger 6 років тому

    very nice documentation

  • @Blade_51
    @Blade_51 3 роки тому

    1:48
    "Little nearby rock" 😂😂😂

  • @jaredbork2586
    @jaredbork2586 6 років тому +1

    I'm pretty biased towards our planes in the states, but the A380 and Beluga XL are fantastic pieces of engineering. Kind of sad they canceled the A380, liked how big it was.

  • @Ashfaq1999
    @Ashfaq1999 3 роки тому

    Great video

  • @Got2Bespoke
    @Got2Bespoke 5 років тому

    Great video! It was put together in an easy to follow format, well researched and the narration was very good and thorough. 👍🏻

  • @colonelstriker2519
    @colonelstriker2519 5 років тому +2

    I never made the connection of the beluga aircraft and the actual beluga until I saw them next to each other

  • @AlvinGuoSubscribe
    @AlvinGuoSubscribe 6 років тому

    This video is really well made and pretty funny. I liked it a lot.

  • @AshtonArcher
    @AshtonArcher 4 роки тому

    Glad to discover this channel, well researched and put together. Great stuff!

  • @Stanula1
    @Stanula1 5 років тому +1

    you must know a lot thank you for telling me this im actually a sort of young aviation fan [im 12] and I didn't know anything about cargo aircraft but now I do!

    • @waterlicker8635
      @waterlicker8635 5 років тому +1

      There are two theories on how lift is created, the more well-known theory is low air pressure is at the top of the wing and high air pressure at the bottom of the wing and the other theory is what some planes use that are shaped like the experimental US plane nicknamed “the flying pancake”, the name was given due to the way it was shaped. Anyways, the other theory is that a plane shaped like the plane I just mentioned gain lift by pitching up about 20-60 degrees up and because of the pitch, the plane has so much “drag” if you can say, as in there is so much air hitting the bottom of the aircraft, where the aircraft actually gains lift

    • @paogene1288
      @paogene1288 3 роки тому

      @@waterlicker8635 Wait theories? I thought this is already known and proven. Well, might as well learn some more about the physics of flight I guess. Thank you, good sir.

    • @waterlicker8635
      @waterlicker8635 3 роки тому

      @@paogene1288 there are two different theories, one of them is more logical than the other

  • @nemom225
    @nemom225 6 років тому +1

    Amazing video, I will spread the word! Keep turning them out!

  • @RFGfotografie
    @RFGfotografie 5 років тому

    Very interesting video, really loved watching it, wish I could photograph one once!

  • @btrdangerdan2010
    @btrdangerdan2010 6 років тому

    I like the old guppies they are old classics!

  • @therealsinsane
    @therealsinsane 6 років тому +2

    Love your accent

  • @veggieboyultimate
    @veggieboyultimate 4 роки тому +1

    Next, let’s make a plane shaped like a ray.

  • @theoccupier1652
    @theoccupier1652 6 років тому

    That was a really good video

  • @galihxtreme
    @galihxtreme 5 років тому +1

    15:51 Paint it green and say "THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO!"

  • @james1seattle
    @james1seattle 5 років тому

    Another excellent video! I grew up in Goleta CA watching 'goopies'(haha).

  • @tnightwolf
    @tnightwolf 4 роки тому

    Guppy!XD Great name!

  • @jayyydizzzle
    @jayyydizzzle 2 роки тому +1

    R.I.P. 225
    We miss you. :(

  • @tomasniewiadomski9979
    @tomasniewiadomski9979 6 років тому +2

    Great video, we def need more stuff with USSR!

  • @henrysolomon1875
    @henrysolomon1875 6 років тому

    awesome video and really informational

  • @FoxtrotStudi0s
    @FoxtrotStudi0s 5 років тому +4

    Me an intellectual: Buys 5 A380-800 and converts them into The Beluga XXXL
    Airbus: Damn why didn't we think of that

  • @GetOutsideYourself
    @GetOutsideYourself 6 років тому

    Great video. You can pronounce "goopie" any way you want to.

  • @__sno__3820
    @__sno__3820 5 років тому

    Nobody
    Skyships: *soup goop*

  • @Boss_Tanaka
    @Boss_Tanaka 4 роки тому

    11:48 «the guys from Seattle laughed that the Airbus airliners are being created on the wings of Boeing »
    I m not sure they re still laughing today but thanks Boeing anyway.
    I live in France and back in the days each time this big belly bird flew over the house my brother would call me shouting ´ le super guppy! le super guppy!´
    Over the same house several times a week at 5:35 pm we would see and hear the concorde roaring. Believe it or not but seeing the super guppy was a more significant event as it was rare and we did not know how lucky we were to see the concorde flying in our skies almost every day.
    Sweet memories

  • @jameslatini
    @jameslatini 6 років тому +2

    Pregnant goopy sounds more like something that should belong in the urban dictionary

  • @marcotuliosilvamiele5356
    @marcotuliosilvamiele5356 6 років тому

    Great Video!!

  • @mikecar52
    @mikecar52 6 років тому

    Thank you

  • @dave8599
    @dave8599 4 роки тому

    Another Excellent Video! Thank you
    p.s. "Guppy" is correctly pronounced with a "short u" sound. The English word "up" has a "short u" sound. In the video Guppy is incorrectly pronounced with a "long u" this "u" sound is as in the word "mute"
    So the "u" in the word Guppy should be pronounced as a "short u" as in the word "up", not as a "long u" as in the word "mute"
    Hope this is helpful.