"Hi judge, my opponent wished me cancer." That was just funny. I don't play Yu-Gi-Oh but I love seeing these judge calls. If not for entertainment purposes, sometimes I get to learn new interactions that I've never heard of before.
@@bongerman42069 I may not play it myself but I do find it to be really interesting. I think the competitive landscape is cool to learn about, I just don't personally play it. I prefer watching from the sidelines.
For the guy who claimed that Construct's effect isn't activated in the games, in Legacy of the Duelist, which is the most recent one, it does activate. It's a mandatory effect, which is what the guy probably got confused by, but it isn't passive. There are very few passive monster effects aside from protection.
He said lingering, which is different from continuous. A lingering effect is one that is no longer attached to a card, and until it expires, there's pretty much nothing that can turn it off. Examples include VFD and azathot. Passive, or continuous effects are attached to cards. You can get rid of them by negating or getting rid of the card.
@@DrDrao though even then lingering effects activate at some point so I’m not sure what he’s on about unless he thinks it activated at the same time as Constructs dump effect.
When in doubt, the dude should know PSCT. Colons and semi colons start a chain, so they cannot be Continuous, which do not have ":" or ";". Construct literally has a ":" in that effect, there should be no confusion for any duelist that knows PSCT which all should. If there is no : or ; then it is reasonable to have confusion as the card can be Pre PSCT (Dark Spirit Art - Greed), or they may not be a Continuous effect, such as with Outer Entity Azathot, it's devastating "lingering" effect cannot be responded to once it is already summoned, and it is not quite Continuous because it lingers once the monster leaves like a Condition for the opponent. A few examples of obvious continuous effects are monsters that attack directly, or cards that continuously do stuff on the field, like gain ATK or Jinzo. When still in doubt, the guy should have checked wiki, and it'll list the effects like "summon, summon condition, continuous, ignition, trigger, quick, unclassified", Constructs effects are all trigger. Something like Number 77: Seven Sins has a protective effect where you can detach a material to protect it, and there are no colons. It is continuous. Something like Ally of Justice Catastor has an effect that reads like Construct, with colons, it is also trigger. Ignition are Spell Speed 1 Main Phase effects. Summon condition are like shortcuts, Summon are like restrictions, at least according to Azathot which has both. We all know (Quick). That's all of them. The word "Lingering" might not be official, but it has it's use like Banish or Pierce were previously unofficial. Passive just seems to add confusion to Continuous or unclassified effects, unless there are unclassified effects that are passive I am overlooking.
that still isn't how the stack works in MTG either. It's very similiar. So lets say Player A casts Wrath of God putting it onto the Stack. Player B then resonds with Counterspell. Player A responds with Negate. You then resolve the stack backwards. The only difference here of MTG and Yugioh is then lets say Negate resolves countering Counterspell. Before Wrath of God resolves Player B can then on the stack add another card like Fierce Guardianship to counter Wrath of God.
@@GamerGeek527 different example to this a example in magic would be playing a creature that makes it so they can play their removal spell or such there is no window to kill it before it resolves but you can counter it
Oh my lord that 20k call. *types out* “I hope you take cancer” Then says “But I didn’t wish it, I only hoped it. I can think anything I want as long as it isn’t a wish or an action.” Bro, you PLAY YUGIOH how do you not know the difference between a thought and an action?! Even if you’re a complete beginner at the game, you should have noticed by now that your opponent can’t chain MST to negate the Raigeki in your hand that you’re debating on whether or not to play right now. Once you TYPE OUT THAT YOU HOPE YOUR RAIGEKI DESTROYS HIS CARDS IRL he can now chain MST to negate your stupidity BECAUSE YOU DECLARED AN ACTION. This is like YuGiOh 101. Man’s been watching too much YuGiOh: DM and thought that everybody can just read minds IRL so might as well type his thoughts out.
If you consider using mst to negate raigeki, or even raigeki break, you may understand the difference between thoughts and actions but you definitely don't understand yugioh rulings. Now yugioh memes is another story.
But cancer isn't necessarily a terminal illness, so he could have argued he wasn't necessarily wishing a terminal illness on someone. It's like danger monsters, you can still activate them under Vanity's Fiend because they don't necessarily special summon.
He is probably trying to pronounce it as エーヴァ which would be correct except the Japanese card name is イーバ (so the correct pronunciation is indeed EEE-VA)
@@Flexy59 Yup I agree! I was mostly just referring to the pronunciation of the “e” sound itself, since many people (Cimo included) may default to Japanese phonetics when unsure. So “correct” was probably not the best description but mostly that I can see where he’s coming from haha
@@Terrantular sorry, ethereal effect is an unofficial slang term, please try to use more correct language like "effect that doesn't start a lingering chain".
I think using Engraver of the mark by calling relevant card is more beneficial. You get a nice info because your opponent must banish it to resolve. If it fizzled, you'll know that he side out or he have all of it in his hand because he need to banish from deck specifically.
Im pretty sure he does it so people will call hun out on it in the comments thereby bringing up activity in the video making it do better in the algorithm. I know this sounds convoluted but it happens ALOT in UA-cam
Can I ask what actually happens with cards like ultimate Falcon and Evenly? I've heard many weird things about it and would love to just hear a "yes it does this". Obviously not just 1 Ultimate Falcon as the only card on field of course, many "card immune" types of cards or whatever
@@Uchiha_Sasuke209 I guess the interaction I could recall from seeing in locals was someone having some DM's and eternal soul on the field and tried claiming evenly wouldn't impact his board. Afaik it would banish all but one but yeah idk just wanted some clarification because some people have a way of making you feel small when you ask them about it
Yoo I remember I shazamed it and didn't find anything and then liked your comment, but yesterday it suddenly said "we found your shazam from a while ago" haha It is Pink sand by Ex Lyd
Hey coder I'm so sorry to bug you but I have a burning question::: the card Dark Sacrifice states that when your opponent activates a card or effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, negate the effect, then send 1 level 3 or lower dark monster from the deck to the graveyard. Would this allow me to activate the effect of despian tragedy/comedy? I'd love a response! Thank you!!
Tragedy can trigger if sent by dark sacrifice; a sent comedy can use it's gy quick effect after dark sacrifice has resolved, in a chain responding to the resolution or once its owner can activate fast effects
@@nathansparks9814 per the instance of Dark Sacrifice sending the monster is part of the effect, not the cost. A cost would be like Send 1 level 3 or lower dark monster from your deck to the GY: negate the effect of a card that would destroy a card or cards on the field...It would be worded a lot better on an actual card, I'm just giving an example.
Hey distant coder. I have a question about star eater. I wanted to know when the card says “ cards ands effects cannot be activated” how long does this last and or is it continuous and if so is it continuous as long as he’s on the field? I appreciate all the work you do informing the community. Much love
@@astogram4321 I’m guessing it would have to say “ as long as this card remains on the field cards and effects cannot be activated” for the later to work
What Star Eater's on-summon effect means is simply that cards and effects cannot be activated during the response window to his summon. Such as your opponent using Solemn Strike / Judgement on Star Eater, as the effect makes it impossible to chain either card to Star Eater's summon. This window ends once you summon Star Eater and neither player has a response, returning to a neutral game state. Though obviously, Star Eater's effect means nobody would be able to respond anyways, so it just means when you place it on the board there's no opportunity to chain a response.
@@anaven27 star eater's summon-cannot-be-negated clause (solemn/etc) is an unclassified effect, its succesful summon being unrespondable is a continuous effect (an active skill drain would permit responses). Those solemns can't be chained to the [succesful] summon, not because of star eater's continuous effect but because they can only be cl1 in the summon negation window, which is prevented by its unclassified effect. I'm reposting here my q i asked on another video: Yugipedia's fusion substitute monster page says they apply on field face-up & face-down, in hand, & in gy, but not in main deck or while banished. So as i understand, if invincibility barrier has banished a synchro, miracle fusion cannot banish muddy mudragon as a named hero whether from field or gy. What about face-up & face-down in extra deck, & do these zone parameters apply to all unclassified effects or just fusion substitute monsters, like does star eater's unclassified imperviousness to summon negation apply while attempting to summon it from the extra deck, & is it affected by invincibility barrier? Edit: trying to extract the actual questions: 1. Can odd-eyes fusion send muddy mudragon to summon rune-eyes, i.e. does muddy mudragon's unclassified fusion-substitute-clause apply while face-down in the extra deck? 2. Does the answer to #1 apply to all unclassified effects? 3. If invincibility barrier banishes a synchro, does it affect star eater's unclassified summon negation imperviousness?
Would be funny if that's because you retaliate with something even worse in response. Altho you probably wouldn't be pointing out the irony if you weren't 'innocent', so in that case: it sucks. Having a way to appeal such cases might be good, but it would just get flooded whenever people aren't happy with the judge calls, so idk. Could have a bigger penalty if you misuse it? But when the 'misuse' wasn't actually misuse?
@@topsycho4451 that doesn't explain which comes first which is my question is damage calculation the falling edge of the damage step or is it not and when and how can you react to both damage calculation and damage step
@@AstralLaVista the substeps of the damage step: Battle Step (attack declaration and after) At the start of the damage Step Before damage calculation During damage calculation After damage calculation End of the damage Step Cards that respond to named parts of the damage Step must be activated in a single chain, but other relevant effects can be used after that chain, before moving to the next step.
My guess is the one where he went against the Konami video game (but another comment says that isn't how it works in the game anyway, so he wasn't wrong?).
@@imsoready1114 I'm down for a punishment but I think anything long term is harsh. To my understanding Konami/DB doesn't have a strict duration for banning and it's more off precedent and judges discretion
"Hi judge, my opponent wished me cancer." That was just funny. I don't play Yu-Gi-Oh but I love seeing these judge calls. If not for entertainment purposes, sometimes I get to learn new interactions that I've never heard of before.
If you dont play YGO why do you even know any interactions fr?
@@bongerman42069 I may not play it myself but I do find it to be really interesting. I think the competitive landscape is cool to learn about, I just don't personally play it. I prefer watching from the sidelines.
For the guy who claimed that Construct's effect isn't activated in the games, in Legacy of the Duelist, which is the most recent one, it does activate. It's a mandatory effect, which is what the guy probably got confused by, but it isn't passive. There are very few passive monster effects aside from protection.
He said lingering, which is different from continuous.
A lingering effect is one that is no longer attached to a card, and until it expires, there's pretty much nothing that can turn it off.
Examples include VFD and azathot.
Passive, or continuous effects are attached to cards. You can get rid of them by negating or getting rid of the card.
@@DrDrao That's what I meant :p
@@DrDrao though even then lingering effects activate at some point so I’m not sure what he’s on about unless he thinks it activated at the same time as Constructs dump effect.
@@geiseric222 I don't know either.
When in doubt, the dude should know PSCT. Colons and semi colons start a chain, so they cannot be Continuous, which do not have ":" or ";". Construct literally has a ":" in that effect, there should be no confusion for any duelist that knows PSCT which all should.
If there is no : or ; then it is reasonable to have confusion as the card can be Pre PSCT (Dark Spirit Art - Greed), or they may not be a Continuous effect, such as with Outer Entity Azathot, it's devastating "lingering" effect cannot be responded to once it is already summoned, and it is not quite Continuous because it lingers once the monster leaves like a Condition for the opponent.
A few examples of obvious continuous effects are monsters that attack directly, or cards that continuously do stuff on the field, like gain ATK or Jinzo.
When still in doubt, the guy should have checked wiki, and it'll list the effects like "summon, summon condition, continuous, ignition, trigger, quick, unclassified", Constructs effects are all trigger.
Something like Number 77: Seven Sins has a protective effect where you can detach a material to protect it, and there are no colons. It is continuous.
Something like Ally of Justice Catastor has an effect that reads like Construct, with colons, it is also trigger.
Ignition are Spell Speed 1 Main Phase effects. Summon condition are like shortcuts, Summon are like restrictions, at least according to Azathot which has both. We all know (Quick). That's all of them.
The word "Lingering" might not be official, but it has it's use like Banish or Pierce were previously unofficial. Passive just seems to add confusion to Continuous or unclassified effects, unless there are unclassified effects that are passive I am overlooking.
That Mystic Mine player was probably a Magic player. You don't need to activate static effects there.
that still isn't how the stack works in MTG either. It's very similiar. So lets say Player A casts Wrath of God putting it onto the Stack. Player B then resonds with Counterspell. Player A responds with Negate. You then resolve the stack backwards. The only difference here of MTG and Yugioh is then lets say Negate resolves countering Counterspell. Before Wrath of God resolves Player B can then on the stack add another card like Fierce Guardianship to counter Wrath of God.
@@GamerGeek527 I'm talking about static effects on the field.
@@GamerGeek527 different example to this a example in magic would be playing a creature that makes it so they can play their removal spell or such there is no window to kill it before it resolves but you can counter it
2:03 props to the editor. Laughed way to hard at that bird.
Can't wait to see Coder retire from judging once he has completed 42069 calls
Oh my lord that 20k call.
*types out* “I hope you take cancer”
Then says “But I didn’t wish it, I only hoped it. I can think anything I want as long as it isn’t a wish or an action.”
Bro, you PLAY YUGIOH how do you not know the difference between a thought and an action?! Even if you’re a complete beginner at the game, you should have noticed by now that your opponent can’t chain MST to negate the Raigeki in your hand that you’re debating on whether or not to play right now.
Once you TYPE OUT THAT YOU HOPE YOUR RAIGEKI DESTROYS HIS CARDS IRL he can now chain MST to negate your stupidity BECAUSE YOU DECLARED AN ACTION.
This is like YuGiOh 101.
Man’s been watching too much YuGiOh: DM and thought that everybody can just read minds IRL so might as well type his thoughts out.
He didnt target his opponet he Selected him🤣
If you consider using mst to negate raigeki, or even raigeki break, you may understand the difference between thoughts and actions but you definitely don't understand yugioh rulings. Now yugioh memes is another story.
I dont think he knew proper english... he probably meant your deck is cancer, or this is cancer. But who knows
But cancer isn't necessarily a terminal illness, so he could have argued he wasn't necessarily wishing a terminal illness on someone.
It's like danger monsters, you can still activate them under Vanity's Fiend because they don't necessarily special summon.
oh it's magnus magnus great king of the computer, i love that card.
magnus mcgilded
bruh that super monkey team hyper force go reference just brought back sooooooooo many memories
I know right talk about nostalgia, that only people our generation would truly get
Holy fuck, super robot monkey team. Bruh you just unlocked a core memory for me.
He is probably trying to pronounce it as エーヴァ which would be correct except the Japanese card name is イーバ (so the correct pronunciation is indeed EEE-VA)
but even the first one would be ehhva not evva so there really is no defending cimos mispronounciation here
@@Flexy59 Yup I agree! I was mostly just referring to the pronunciation of the “e” sound itself, since many people (Cimo included) may default to Japanese phonetics when unsure. So “correct” was probably not the best description but mostly that I can see where he’s coming from haha
@@honoka_iidx oh yeah that makes sense :D
"Construct is a mandatory lingering effect" true, but Crystal Wing's effect is an unclassified negate, so it can still negate it :)
Yes, but the Lost Warrior froma DD in my Extra Deck is a non-targeting ethereal effect, so your summon of Construct was illegal to begin with
@@Terrantular sorry, ethereal effect is an unofficial slang term, please try to use more correct language like "effect that doesn't start a lingering chain".
I think using Engraver of the mark by calling relevant card is more beneficial. You get a nice info because your opponent must banish it to resolve. If it fizzled, you'll know that he side out or he have all of it in his hand because he need to banish from deck specifically.
Card is garbage
You can't retire until you get to 42,069 calls :3
Better yet, make him go to 69k! Run him ragged!
Better yet, make him go to 69k! Run him ragged!
Oh man that gurl was in painful disbelief and feel you...i feel you *cries in branded fusion*
4:44 DAS MEEEEEEE
oh also great editing dan :D its incredible
Well, you did your best
The only answer to Cimo mispronouncing so many cards wrong is because his main language is Spanish.
Is it?
It should be because his pronounciation would not be incorrect in spanish
@@murua44 I do not think so. But all the names that he mispronounces he says as if he were reading them in Spanish.
Im pretty sure he does it so people will call hun out on it in the comments thereby bringing up activity in the video making it do better in the algorithm. I know this sounds convoluted but it happens ALOT in UA-cam
Holy cow!~ Someone else remembers SRMTHFG!
Great video, tho what was the song played at 5:55?
Mandatory lingering effect construct yep
That definitely a thing
Absolutely lost it at "We're banning someone!"
Bruh the moment the monkey happend why did I immediately think of hyper force and there it went
Can I ask what actually happens with cards like ultimate Falcon and Evenly? I've heard many weird things about it and would love to just hear a "yes it does this". Obviously not just 1 Ultimate Falcon as the only card on field of course, many "card immune" types of cards or whatever
evenly doesnt affect monsters
@@Uchiha_Sasuke209 I guess the interaction I could recall from seeing in locals was someone having some DM's and eternal soul on the field and tried claiming evenly wouldn't impact his board. Afaik it would banish all but one but yeah idk just wanted some clarification because some people have a way of making you feel small when you ask them about it
I miss these.
Yoo Alternative Dark Magician still makes me laugh... 🤭😂
Lol the dude from the 20.000th call 😂 "i can think what I want". Wonder why he didn't bring up "freedom of speech"
Guy clearly didn’t speak English. He outright said he was Google translating everything he put in the chat.
2:37 hey! itsa me
Congrats on 20k
Nah man, he was wishing for his opponent to pull Flaminox cancer the next time he buys a booster pack.
Dude, if regular Yugioh played like "Yu-Gi-Oh! The Eternal Duelist Soul" for the GameBoy Advance SP then I'd be so happy.
question for dan. what is the song at 5:55 ?
Yoo I remember I shazamed it and didn't find anything and then liked your comment, but yesterday it suddenly said "we found your shazam from a while ago" haha
It is Pink sand by Ex Lyd
@@extreme8058 same
Cant wait for Coder to hit 42069 calls and hopefully ban someone on that call
Congratilations on 20000 judge calls!!!
Hey coder I'm so sorry to bug you but I have a burning question::: the card Dark Sacrifice states that when your opponent activates a card or effect that destroys a card(s) on the field, negate the effect, then send 1 level 3 or lower dark monster from the deck to the graveyard. Would this allow me to activate the effect of despian tragedy/comedy? I'd love a response! Thank you!!
Tragedy can trigger if sent by dark sacrifice; a sent comedy can use it's gy quick effect after dark sacrifice has resolved, in a chain responding to the resolution or once its owner can activate fast effects
@@analoghabits9217 thank you!!
@@analoghabits9217 the whole send for cost vs no cost is still rough for me lmfao
@@nathansparks9814 per the instance of Dark Sacrifice sending the monster is part of the effect, not the cost. A cost would be like Send 1 level 3 or lower dark monster from your deck to the GY: negate the effect of a card that would destroy a card or cards on the field...It would be worded a lot better on an actual card, I'm just giving an example.
@@SuperRedNovaDragon I appreciate it! Getting back into the yugioh groove has been fun lol
So when do you get your grey name status?
next milestone is 42,069 calls
Hey distant coder. I have a question about star eater. I wanted to know when the card says “ cards ands effects cannot be activated” how long does this last and or is it continuous and if so is it continuous as long as he’s on the field? I appreciate all the work you do informing the community. Much love
It's just on the summon, after the summon-response-window effects can be activated again just fine
@@astogram4321 I’m guessing it would have to say “ as long as this card remains on the field cards and effects cannot be activated” for the later to work
What Star Eater's on-summon effect means is simply that cards and effects cannot be activated during the response window to his summon. Such as your opponent using Solemn Strike / Judgement on Star Eater, as the effect makes it impossible to chain either card to Star Eater's summon.
This window ends once you summon Star Eater and neither player has a response, returning to a neutral game state. Though obviously, Star Eater's effect means nobody would be able to respond anyways, so it just means when you place it on the board there's no opportunity to chain a response.
@@anaven27 this is incorrect. Star Eater stops cards like Trap Hole, that are activated in response to its successful summon.
@@anaven27 star eater's summon-cannot-be-negated clause (solemn/etc) is an unclassified effect, its succesful summon being unrespondable is a continuous effect (an active skill drain would permit responses). Those solemns can't be chained to the [succesful] summon, not because of star eater's continuous effect but because they can only be cl1 in the summon negation window, which is prevented by its unclassified effect.
I'm reposting here my q i asked on another video:
Yugipedia's fusion substitute monster page says they apply on field face-up & face-down, in hand, & in gy, but not in main deck or while banished. So as i understand, if invincibility barrier has banished a synchro, miracle fusion cannot banish muddy mudragon as a named hero whether from field or gy. What about face-up & face-down in extra deck, & do these zone parameters apply to all unclassified effects or just fusion substitute monsters, like does star eater's unclassified imperviousness to summon negation apply while attempting to summon it from the extra deck, & is it affected by invincibility barrier?
Edit: trying to extract the actual questions:
1. Can odd-eyes fusion send muddy mudragon to summon rune-eyes, i.e. does muddy mudragon's unclassified fusion-substitute-clause apply while face-down in the extra deck?
2. Does the answer to #1 apply to all unclassified effects?
3. If invincibility barrier banishes a synchro, does it affect star eater's unclassified summon negation imperviousness?
You can actually make Verte under Nervall banish effect so yeah
The one time I see a fellow Ice Barrier player, they are a terrible human being. Rip.
2:58 should have declumped more
am i missing something what ruling did he get wrong
It wasn't 2 weeks, it was a few sets.... 2 days later.... Oh black magician of chaos max.
I was in the stream for the 20k judge call........Fuck me I left early in the stream....
Well, here's to 30k.
Need help 🙏❤️
Eater of millions battle effect vs flip effect monsters. Do they activate?
EoM banishes the monster before they flip face-up. Since EoM's effect triggers at the start of the damage step not during or after.
And when I call a judge because my opponent insults me I get a full warning and they only got a minor because “it wasn’t against DB rules”
Would be funny if that's because you retaliate with something even worse in response.
Altho you probably wouldn't be pointing out the irony if you weren't 'innocent', so in that case: it sucks.
Having a way to appeal such cases might be good, but it would just get flooded whenever people aren't happy with the judge calls, so idk. Could have a bigger penalty if you misuse it? But when the 'misuse' wasn't actually misuse?
@@loxcreast9145 I didn’t retaliate I just called a judge and said I do not appreciate being spoken to like this by my opponent
30K LETS GO
did the construct guy think he had meltdown up
I miss him
nah go for 69420 calls
Why didn’t he want the Progression series boys to pull Altergeist cards?
Because Altergeist is seen as a boring/unfun deck to watch.
I would think Crystal Wing cannot activate since its the start of the damage step? Not sure.
Negating *activation* is allowed in the damage step, not to be confused with negating *effect*
Who was the Drytron Girl?
You need to reach 69 420 calls. Then stop.
You really should retire at 69,420 calls though. I'm being serious
pretty sure you have to retire at 420,69 calls. its in the rules
What's the difference between damage step and damage calculation?
Damage Calculation is just a smaller part of the Damage Step
@@topsycho4451 that doesn't explain which comes first which is my question is damage calculation the falling edge of the damage step or is it not and when and how can you react to both damage calculation and damage step
@@AstralLaVista the substeps of the damage step:
Battle Step (attack declaration and after)
At the start of the damage Step
Before damage calculation
During damage calculation
After damage calculation
End of the damage Step
Cards that respond to named parts of the damage Step must be activated in a single chain, but other relevant effects can be used after that chain, before moving to the next step.
@@topsycho4451 Although the battle step is not in the damage step, just to clarify.
KEKW RC0 judge
Using a game as a source to prove your point if they game is actually current and not years old now
Oh no someone hoped a bad thing happens to me lets call the fbi what a snowflake 🤣
We need dark magician to get into tier 0 so konami will be happy lol
What rulling did you have wrong?
Its clickbait. It was the player that got it wrong not coder
as a mystic mine player, i do not disagree that mine is a stupid card withg stupid mindsets
So what ruling did he get "wrong?!"
My guess is the one where he went against the Konami video game (but another comment says that isn't how it works in the game anyway, so he wasn't wrong?).
you need to go to 69420 calls and retire
Smile
What is this game?
Yeah yeah 20k tell me when u r getting to 69 k
Nice
Early gang
Dang that last one I feel like a ban is harsh 😂 or if it's a temporary ban/freeze make it like a week or sum
He did get frozen tho
@@borisheidenreich1830 Yeah but I'm saying it should be temporary and a short time
It's their rules, you have to play by them. Besides it's a card game for children why do you need to say that stuff anyway
@@imsoready1114 I'm down for a punishment but I think anything long term is harsh. To my understanding Konami/DB doesn't have a strict duration for banning and it's more off precedent and judges discretion
@@Boristien405 He got frozen, not perma banned. Depending on his history, his first freeze will not last that long.
This content pisses me off. I know 20 times better judges. Weak
He's just appealing to his audience. You're just not his type of audience. To each their own, as they say.
So don’t click on it 4Head