What is Cronbach's Alpha? - Explained Simply

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @lookingupwithwonder
    @lookingupwithwonder 5 років тому +60

    Nope. Still don’t get it.

    • @creativeconfusion288
      @creativeconfusion288 3 роки тому

      @Herschel Brammer that is wrong. If you don't trust her- don't be with her... trust and privacy is important.

    • @miwwie1504
      @miwwie1504 4 місяці тому

      I want to (and will) kill myself.

  • @jemgem9593
    @jemgem9593 5 років тому +10

    What a lovely voice you have 🦉

  • @coyootje
    @coyootje 5 років тому +8

    Thanks! Super helpful video, my stats professor is terrible

  • @gymnasticwali
    @gymnasticwali 7 років тому +3

    it added consistent approach to my knowledge.

  • @fernandoduartemolina
    @fernandoduartemolina 9 років тому +5

    Thank you so much for these videos (part 1 and part 2), they are very helpful

  • @josefinasanchez6528
    @josefinasanchez6528 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you again and again !

  • @sushmitadebbarma4980
    @sushmitadebbarma4980 Рік тому +1

    Thank you very much! May I have the video's references? Furthermore, are reliability tests necessary for demographic questions?

  • @prof.dr.samiaabdelmouty5212
    @prof.dr.samiaabdelmouty5212 7 років тому +3

    thanks for simple explanation

  • @MoCowbell
    @MoCowbell 9 років тому +10

    Can you explain why it is not a measure of homogeneity?

  • @davesanborn8869
    @davesanborn8869 3 роки тому +1

    This is a great video for me. I am working withn SPS in a statistics course. I am not versed in mathematics or statistics. My course is challenging. I am going cite some information from the three videos on Cronbach's Alpha. I can use the youtube url, but I can't find anything that referencves your name! I feel sort of stupid!

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  3 роки тому

      Don't feel stupid: www.how2statsbook.com/p/about.html

  • @F4collector
    @F4collector 5 років тому +1

    Great explanation - thanks

  • @itamar.j.rachailovich
    @itamar.j.rachailovich Рік тому

    Can you please show the derivation of the alpha- of the formula

  • @manzoorahmad-mu3xv
    @manzoorahmad-mu3xv 2 роки тому

    The value is negative due to a negative average covariance among items. This violates reliability model assumptions. You may want to check item codings.

  • @janitosalipdan6002
    @janitosalipdan6002 2 роки тому

    How is Cronbach's Alpha different from Cohen's Kappa in terms of Nominal Data?

  • @hannahharrison4278
    @hannahharrison4278 4 роки тому +1

    my study involves two groups of participants completing the same questionnaire - will I have to conduct a Cronbach alpha test two times for each group? or overall With the complete data set responses? thank you!

    • @StewartW
      @StewartW 3 роки тому

      hellllo hope your study 8 months ago went well.... i'm also doing two groups completing the same questionnaire (parents and their children), wondering what tests you decided to use? ahaha I have so far used wilcoxon test & mcNemar's test (which i simplified it to just agree/disagree for). Cheers!

  • @josefinasanchez6528
    @josefinasanchez6528 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much

  • @mdoerkse
    @mdoerkse 3 роки тому

    This is a simple explanation? I didn't understand anything that was being said. I haven't studied statistics though, so maybe that is a prerequisite.

  • @couragee1
    @couragee1 2 роки тому

    thank you!

  • @Northwind-druid
    @Northwind-druid 5 років тому

    Thanks for this! :-)

  • @chandranmanimaran8110
    @chandranmanimaran8110 8 років тому

    Why there is negative value in Cronbach's alpha? How to correct it?

    • @tenochtitilian
      @tenochtitilian 5 років тому +4

      Imagine there were two items in a questionnaire. The questionnaire is a 5-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Q1. I like stats. Q2. I hate stats. Say someone dislikes stats. They might score a 1 for Q1 and 5 for Q2. For people that dislike stats, as they score low on Q1, they tend to score high on Q2, giving a negative correlation. Vice versa for people who like stats, but the correlation will still be negative. To get around this problem, before calculating Cronbach's alpha, use reverse scoring. Reverse scoring does something like say for Q1, a score of 1 is converted to a 5; 2 to 3, etc.

  • @manzoorahmad-mu3xv
    @manzoorahmad-mu3xv 2 роки тому

    how to tackle this issue

  • @ninmat
    @ninmat 8 років тому +1

    How is consistency different from homogeneity and unidimensionality?

    • @how2stats
      @how2stats  8 років тому +2

      Unidimensionality implies the presence of only one factor in the data (and is determined with factor analysis); coefficient alpha (consistency) assumes unidimensionality (it can't test for it). Coefficient alpha simply represents a ratio of true score variance (reliable/consistent) variance to total variance. I can't say for sure what people mean by homogeneity, in this context.

    • @JohnLeMayIV
      @JohnLeMayIV 7 років тому

      Homogeneity and unidimensionality get more at validity as well, I believe.

    • @anuradhapremathilake
      @anuradhapremathilake 7 років тому

      what is your name? and how can i use this as a reference
      ???

  • @shaunlikescheese
    @shaunlikescheese 9 років тому +1

    ...Gilles?

  • @boudewijnbinkhorst7067
    @boudewijnbinkhorst7067 5 років тому +1

    explanation starts at 03.10

  • @citizenbobx
    @citizenbobx 4 роки тому +1

    Uses 5 other terms in the first minute that I didn't understand either.

  • @gregn5389
    @gregn5389 3 роки тому

    Not simply explained at all