The REAL Physics of Tesla’s Wireless Electricity
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
- How Tesla’s Wireless Transmission System ACTUALLY Works!!
A single wire system can be easily devised as long as there is a place for the charges at each end to displace onto and then discharge back down the line from where it first came.
For example the massive upper terminal of the magnifying transmitter and receiver, works like a giant capacitor allowing charges to move up into the upper terminal and then bounce back into the ground sending the current back to the way it came.
It’s like putting a helmoltz acoustic resonator on a muffler system for acoustic damping and different effects within a pipe system.
Imagine you have a long hose, with two large balloons on either end of the hose, each filled up halfway.
If you squeeze one balloon slowly It will cause the other balloon to expand at the other end.
(Obviously for this analogy sake imagine the balloons don’t have a higher elastic strength before being filled up than once filled, ie don’t fully squish the balloon.)
And then if you let go of the squished balloon, the other balloon’s inflated size and pressure will “discharge” back into he squished balloon.
The squished balloon will fill back up.
The resistance of a conductive path is inversely proportional to the Area of conduction.
R = rho * L / A
A= pi * r^2
which in the earths case means the resistance is divided by the earths radius squared...
That plummets the power loss for any distance transmitted to nearly zero.
P_LOSS = R * |^2
Never mind the fact that Tesla proposed to step the voltages up to 100 million volts, 3 orders of
magnitude higher than current transmission lines. If we step the voltage up by 1000x then the current will drop by x/1000.
And if current drops by x/1000 then the power losses from transmission drop by a 1/1,000,000th.
So when the conductive area plummets the resistance for conduction to nearly zero and the currents through the conductive medium plummet by a factor of x/1000 then the power losses for transmitting nearly any distance goes to zero. Full stop.
And because the voltage drop over any distance through the ground is nearly zero there is no voltage potential gradient to cause touch and step voltage issues in the ground.
Lastly it’s the very low 50/60hz ac frequency that makes Ac dangerous.
When frequency is brought up but kept below the point of where it would emit EM oscillations/radio waves, what’s known as the skin effect occurs.
This causes the currents to not be able to penetrate into the core of thin conductors.
Ergo, why we don’t use higher frequencies on our thin wire transmission lines.
It just negates the center of the wire.
But let’s just say for example if there were to be a fault in this system, when the frequency is high enough this makes it impossible for it to harm someone as it conducts over the surface of our skin and cannot damage our internal organs or skin for that matter.
But a fault would be inordinately unlikely when the system is designed correctly.
So for example when using 100,000,000 volts even when only using 1 amp, the power transmitted is still 100,000,000 watts or 100,000KW or 100megawatts.
As since power loss is current dependent the only power loss will be derived from that 1 amp As well the earth resistance is dependent upon the are of conduction.
It’s the same thing as if you had a pipe of a tiny area or a large area.
The resistance to flow is still current dependent but the amount of flow and energy from the same current through a much larger area has a much smaller loss.
Again functionally the rho resistivity of soil is divided by the earths radius squared. Which is just massive.
Rho is about 10^6 and the earths radius 6,371,000 or about 6*10^6
R_earth = rho * L/ A
So when earth resistance is actually
R_Earth = (10^6) * (2 * 6.371meters * 10^6) / (pi * (6.371meters * 10^6)^2)
= 0.09992 ohms
So at let’s say we have 1amp of 100,000,000volts transmitted.
A total of 100 megawatts transmitted.
P_Loss = R*1^2
= (0.09992 ohms) * (1amp) ^2
= 0.09992 watts power loss
Now to be clear this is just a simplified example as the resistance is higher at the point of current injection but this is why land area did very high conductivity would be chosen for the transmitter locations.
Coincidentally this is why Tesla had very large metal lined tunnels spanning in all directions underground of the wardenclyffe tower. #energy #electricalengineering #engineering #mechanicalengineering #physics #power #renewables #aerospaceengineering
Build it, use it, show it off, share it, don't get dead.
The real issue was no one would want to pay to run such a system without being able to charge for its use
Hey thanks for commenting. But Tesla’s art of individualization completely debunks the myth about not being able to charge.
They can encrypt the power signal just like communication signals can be encrypted.
The problem was that it opens up the markets for ANYONE to be an energy producer and seller, it makes the energy market a free market.
They always could charge. They just couldn’t stop others from competing on this system like the electrical grid assets the energy monopoly they have because there’s no where else to buy it except for the grid.
And yet we are taxed on everything today and find it normal
@@dylanwilliams8533 check out this copy pasta 🍝 of mine. It’s a bit long but worth the read!
Shaking certain things creates physical vibrations in the earth.
Shaking things in strategic and organized locations at the same time or in orchestrated timing can cause all the waves to be added together and cause very VERY large effects in localized and targeted locations.
Shaking things at specific geological locations turns the physical vibrations into alternating electric voltage potentials within the earth due to the properties of some materials in the ground in those certain locations.
All of which, combined with Electromagnetic waves that radiate through the air makes one large “concert” physical, electrical magnetic and electromagnetic wave resonances and harmonics in around and outside the earth, the atmosphere and the upper ionosphere and larger.
Such is life.
All is Love. ❤️🔥🙏 Life is All.
It’s not that our emotions “power” everything.
It’s that they use our emotions to get us to want to exert our physical energy out at specific locations so that the vibrations made from our dancing, sports, commute, industry, travel, leisure, you name it, all the vibrations from the motions of our life are harnessed via these ground transmission systems that rectify the full spectrum of mechanical wave frequencies into usable electricity.
That then either gets stored and/or powers the militaries and god knows what else…
Which is all well and good as we were going to exert and release that energy onto the earths surface anyways…
but the dark part of my brain immediately thinks…
“I’d even bet good money on them having even done studies at one point to see the up and down ticks in total power output harnessed per one of us people as they increased and decreased the sugar/high fructose corn syrup content of our breakfast cereals, bread… everything.”
Because why wouldn’t they do that study if they have this system… 🤭
Heck and the sugar we don’t burn off just makes us fatter which makes even every single step we take just exert that little bit more energy and power being heavier.
Every stop and start we make requires more energy and power with more weight…
and that must go somewhere…
which is the ground.
They use our emotions and traumas to get us to willfully choose to act out our their pre-programmed dramas, all just to make us their pack llamas. 🦙
Which are all the literal physical vibrations and energy put into the earth from all our societal life and motions.
Have you done your Gooble Box steps today?
(Thank you Rick and Morty 🤭)
This IS the Nuclear Family.
Our Nuclear Society. 🦾☢️
“It was beautiful. We were selling rich men and women their own fat asses back to them.” Tyler Durden
U literally just single handedly blew away almost all free energy devices on the internet.
Love your channel but this one gives me motion sickness... Way to much motion , too many transitions, and flashes. Had to listen without video. Thanks❤
Hey thanks for your input! 🙏
@@CharlieSolis Thanks for responding! 💜
All the best!
I can't see Tyson endorsing this.
The fact that he either mistakenly or purposely said that the system was unworkable is a definitely sign that he would not. He essentially said the transmitting towers would need to be everywhere and emit all their EM radiation through the air in order to work, which, if that was how they worked, would have been correct. It would have inundated the air with high power densities which as far as we know, our planet has seldom seen and could have negative implications for life on Earth, to say nothing of existing signals infrastructure. It's fairly clear though that was NOT what Tesla said or stated in his patents but to a non-electrical engineer it's definitely possible to not understand what Tesla was implying. I thought that the power was transmitted through the atmosphere as well at first until I saw the extent of the grounding required for this Colorado Springs and Warden Cliff sites. The grounding at Warden Cliff went much deeper underground than the tower extended into the sky, utilizing several steel I-beams driven into the ground. They needed to be regularly maintained as well to ensure the system had enough of a "grip" on the Earth to ensure the system could actually control the electrical state of the entire planet. There were/are several tunnels around the grounding "rods" to allow maintenance personnel to appropriately maintain the connection and steel itself.
With all that evidence pointing to a lot of the system's functioning involving the Earth's crust, it's hard to believe a man as smart as Tyson would not have made that connection and at least understood the operating principle of the system. That being said, if he had not spent a lot of time investigating it and just thought he "got it" then sure, his more limited understanding would lead him to that erroneous conclusion. In Tyson's defense, Tesla did slip into a bit of a mild madness in his later years, so easier to jump to the conclusion that Tesla came up with the idea in a fever-dream, but his wireless transmission system was something he came up with at the pinnacle of his genius, not in his reclusive years spent in his NY apartment, dreaming up death rays and falling in love with a pigeon... which yea. yikes.
@ImprovisedExpletiveDevice The simplest analogy might be a network whose nodes are tuned circuits with high Q factors so they respond to only a very narrow frequency range. As long as no one is drawing off energy, very little energy needs to be put in to maintain the oscillations throughout the system, as the only loss will be a small amount in each oscillator from heat produced. In fact the oscillation amplitudes will rise to the point of an equilibrium in which the loss from I^2 R in each oscilator will match the amount of energy going in. OK so that's the sort of steady state situation once you have pumped in enough energy to get the oscillators (the tuned circuits) oscillating in the first place (like pushing a kid on a swing repeatedly until the swing is moving significantly).
Now consider what happens when you start drawing off energy at one of the oscillators. There will then be a power flow thru the network to balance out the energy distribution. That means the generator feeding the network has to pump in a higher power level to maintain the high amplitudes of the oscillators. In other words, if you take energy out, someone has to put some back in. Just as in a conventional power distribution network.
Conventional power distribution networks use 3 phases 120 degrees apart so they don't need a common return wire because, provided you balance the phases, the return wire would have zero current passing thru it. Such networks run at very high voltages so as to keep down the currents. Even so, you can pick up energy from a device near a distribution tower, if you are dumb enough to want to. And sure people tap into lower-voltage domestic distribution networks in 3rd-world countries to get free power.
So what's the difference with the Tesla system? Well it's using oscillators as local energy storage devices. Kind of incidental to how it works. But tke key concern is the viability of transferring energy to the oscillators thru a network that is NOT a bunch of purpose-designed cables but a pre-existing thing called a planet. And that's where I think it comes unstuck. The idea is that the voltage can be kept super-high to reduce the current and hence the I^2 R losses. But look at how homes are protected. They have earthing systems. Basically a circuit is protected by a connection to the indoor plumbing (assuming the pipes are copper). That copper eventually runs into the ground. So the assumption is that a whacking great amount of power from a domestic short-circuit to the earth attached to the covering of a device (such as a motor or whatever) can be dissipated into the ground with no problem, ie the ground is expected to offer very little resistance, because it is absolutely massive.
Well, that being the case, if I want to put 2 stakes in the ground at some distance from one another and put a super-high potential difference between them of hundreds of megavolts, I can't expect that the electrical resistance is so high that I^2 R losses will be virtually nil. I may cook the ground!!! Also different terrains will have widely different characteristics. But typically they will have ground water somewhere and salts that are soluble or partially so. Inevitably there is going to be more conductivity than you are bargaining for.
Well that would be for DC. But what if you go for AC and have a free choice as to what frequency you want to use? 50-60 Hz. Maybe 1 MHz. Maybe 100 MHz. Well you could go craxy trying alternatives. But you are going to run into phase-related issues. If you have multiple generators in a network, they all need to be precisely timed so they all push at the same time, and all pull at the same time, otherwise they will be dumping power into each other. So that would set an upper limit to use of high frequencies.
I don't know how conductivity will vary with frequency in the ground but it sure doesn't stop earth wiring from working at 50-60 Hz.
I don't have time to think about this any further and my degree was in electronics not power engineering and goes back half a century. But I can't help seeing some serious problems. If it worked, someone would have done it by now. I feel this whole thing could get swallowed up into the world of whacy pseudo-science and conspiracy theories about aliens building pyramids as power generators and all that kind of crap. (Darned stupid way to build a power generator. Any engineer who used such tonnage of stone so pointlessly would be fired on the spot.) Anyway, enough said.
@@ImprovisedExpletiveDevice he seems to not care enough to dare himself, to miss that important chunck of information, i think is charlie being using irony, at the end then it only need a lab experiment to test the idea to prove it wrong its say it that the power can be conducted even in the same wires that we have today and the gain is for example instead of wires we could conect the circuit by a "wire" of dirt that could be a road of 1 meter of diameter of dirt and you can make an static discharge of 5000v with a ballon this in theory, because is ac, work like that a lot of volts lil current
I wonder if or to what extent this would affect things living underground including plant roots etc? We are starting to understand the communication networks of plants and mycelium... Or even marine biology.
This isn't a coherent though, just things popping into my mind.
Maybe you addressed this and I am too ignorant to understand, but were Tesla's wave Scalar waves riding on carrier waves? Maybe those don't interact as much?
What about the ideas that his system was more related to the zenneck surface waves
Hey thanks but that’s patently inaccurate.
Even real verbatim says over and over his system does NOT use EM waves.
Tesla: “There is no radiation in this case. You see, the apparatus which I devised was an apparatus enabling one to produce tremendous differences of potential and currents in an antenna circuit. These requirements must be fulfilled, whether you transmit by currents of conduction, or whether you transmit by electromagnetic waves. You want high potential currents, you want a great amount of vibratory energy; but you can graduate this vibratory energy. By proper design and choice of wave lengths, you can arrange it so that you get, for instance, 5 percent in these electromagnetic waves and 95 percent in the current that goes through the earth. That is what I am doing. Or, you can get, as these radio men, 95 percent in the energy of electromagnetic waves and only 5 percent in the energy of the current. Then you are wondering why you do not get good results. I know why I do not get good results in that way. The apparatus is suitable for one or the other method. I am not producing radiation in my system; I am suppressing electromagnetic waves. But, on the other hand, my apparatus can be used effectively with electromagnetic waves. The apparatus has nothing to do with this new method except that it is the only means to practice it. So that in my system, you should free yourself of the idea that there is radiation, that energy is radiated. It is not radiated; it is conserved”.
“By proper design and choice of wave lengths, you can arrange it so that you get, for instance, 5 percent in these electromagnetic waves and 95 percent in the current that goes through the earth. That is what I am doing. Or you can get, as these radio men, 95 percent in the energy of electromagnetic waves and only 5 percent in the energy of the current. ... The apparatus is suitable for one or the other method. I am not producing radiation with my system; I am suppressing electromagnetic waves. ... In my system, you should free yourself of the idea that there is radiation, that the energy is radiated. It is not radiated; it is conserved.” -Nikola Tesla
“The radio men who came after me had the problem before them of making a bell sound, and they immersed it in mercury. Now, you know mercury is heavy. When they struck their bell, the mercury did not permit it to vibrate long because it took away all the energy. I put my bell in a vacuum and make it vibrate for hours. I have designed circuits in connection with an enterprise in 1898 for transmission of energy which, once started, would vibrate three years, and even after that the oscillations could still be detected. Professor Wein’s theory is very beautiful, but it really has no practical meaning. It will become useless as soon as the inefficient apparatus of the day, with antennae that radiate energy rapidly, [are] replaced by a scientifically designed oscillator which does not give out energy except when it gets up to a tremendous electromagnetic momentum”. -Nikola Tesla
@@CharlieSolis Thanks for the video on this, I always love Tesla wireless transmission videos.