What are But For and Substantial Factor Causation?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лип 2024
  • What are But For and Substantial Factor Causation? This video introduces two tests for causation, commonly applied by courts. You will often see this discussion in connection with torts actions based on negligence.
    Torts Quizes: www.uslawessentials.com/torts-...
    United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at:
    www.amazon.com/author/daniele...
    To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my website:
    website: www.uslawessentials.com
    blog: www.uslawessentials.com/blog
    email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com
    Twitter: / uslawessentials

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @danjbundrick
    @danjbundrick 3 роки тому +8

    My head is spinning at the thought that the defendant ripped the tree up by the roots with that giant axe.

  • @indaystocome7416
    @indaystocome7416 6 років тому +26

    I'm a first year struggling law student, thank you for your simple wording and heaps of examples It has helped me.

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  6 років тому +2

      Thanks, Tammey! I also tutor law students. uslawessentials.com

    • @ronricooandasan9612
      @ronricooandasan9612 2 роки тому

      Hi! How are you? Are you on your third year already?

  • @eeeshieee
    @eeeshieee 7 місяців тому +1

    Aahhh -- this is SO SO helpful! I'm planning to take my tort law exam tonight, and I wasn't entirely sure if the but-for test and substantial-factor test were BOTH required to prove causation. Thank you so much for making this video! You're a lifesaver!

  • @fatinalisya4275
    @fatinalisya4275 4 роки тому +6

    Thanks for the short and simple explanation ! It helps me a lot

  • @vale.violet4310
    @vale.violet4310 Рік тому +2

    thank you so much sir ! been struggling to understand this for a long time, but your video makes it so easy to understand

  • @hzzofficial
    @hzzofficial 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much, I love you for this!

  • @hyojinlee
    @hyojinlee 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this video❤️

  • @thomasbray9646
    @thomasbray9646 6 років тому +3

    Outstanding explanation of 2 in Causation. Thank you!!!

  • @ryanjames9123
    @ryanjames9123 5 років тому +1

    Great video!

  • @lailaadorable553
    @lailaadorable553 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much. So clear and understandable

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  4 роки тому

      Sure, thanks for watching. uslawessentials.com

  • @wassuhmufusaLOL
    @wassuhmufusaLOL 7 років тому

    i love your channel. thank you so so so much

  • @israfulafrin3594
    @israfulafrin3594 7 років тому +2

    Thank you...

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  7 років тому

      Sure! uslawessentials.com Let me know if you have any questions.

  • @katarinachurich5166
    @katarinachurich5166 2 роки тому

    Question - in the last scenario, how would plaintiff be able to hold defendant liable if it doesn't pass the but for or substantial factor test?

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  2 роки тому

      If there is no causation there is no liability.

  • @justinejackson1409
    @justinejackson1409 7 років тому +1

    Can you talk about a 3rd element that falls under causation (cause in fact)?
    1) but for
    2) substantial cause
    3) alternative cause

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  7 років тому +2

      Please check out a video on alternative liability:
      uslawessentials.com/what-is-alternative-liability/

  • @miryamishot
    @miryamishot 7 років тому

    Thank you so much

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  7 років тому

      No worries, Miryam. Any other topics interest you?

    • @miryamishot
      @miryamishot 7 років тому +1

      USLawEssentials battle of the forms 2-207

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  7 років тому

      Here are some older videos, let me know whether you still have questions. My blog has a contact form. uslawessentials.com/blog
      ua-cam.com/video/ama0epDkt6c/v-deo.html (mirror image rule)
      ua-cam.com/video/ZG9cyqluC54/v-deo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 1)
      ua-cam.com/video/44HlgjyQSV8/v-deo.html (UCC modification of mirror image part 2)

  • @WokeAfrica
    @WokeAfrica 5 років тому

    wow

  • @E55666
    @E55666 2 роки тому +1

    You made this seem too easy

  • @charles489
    @charles489 6 років тому +2

    The example is not proper, by lifting weights, properly performed under all circumstances, your back will become stronger and stronger.

    • @shakenblake9
      @shakenblake9 3 роки тому +4

      Your criticism is improper, assuming that lifting weights is always properly performed under all circumstances (and that plaintiff could somehow prove that..)

  • @unic0de-yvr
    @unic0de-yvr 6 років тому +3

    > "What are But For"
    For pooping, silly.

    • @unic0de-yvr
      @unic0de-yvr 6 років тому +2

      (ps sorry for spoiling the tenor of this very informative video)

    • @USLawEssentials
      @USLawEssentials  6 років тому +1

      No worries, thanks for sharing.

  • @zahirabenmekhloua7826
    @zahirabenmekhloua7826 4 роки тому

    if he hadn't taken the axe to the tree, the car would have been ok