With all the donations year upon year ( even in decline) why was no interest on deposit registered ? Suggesting that cash was deposited out as soon as it arrived in, and then re submitted for accounting purposes . 😊
Tbf l heard that the governor didn’t hold a press conference about Archwell. He was holding one for a different unrelated reason and a journalist asked him about Archwell.
CharityWatch, a watchdog group in Chicago that investigates nonprofit organizations, said it considers the Archewell Foundation "not ratable” given that it was founded only recently and does not have enough years' worth of financial activity. CharityWatch CEO Laurie Styron said the foundation appears to stray from the norm in at least one aspect: In its 2022 tax filing, it reports its governing body consists of only two people - Harry and Meghan. She said the widely accepted minimum "best practice" in the nonprofit sector is five voting board members, "the majority of which should be independent." In general, "a charity whose board is too small and lacks a majority independent board is not well-positioned to consistently make decisions that are in the best interest of the charity or provide adequate oversight of its operations," Styron said. "Charities are not small businesses or hobbies intended to be controlled by one married couple or family. Rather, they are owned by the public for the public interest and are intended to exist as legal entities independent from the interests of the people running them."
@@justmyopinion526 well, when people don't donate any more, the 'well' dries up. But for the people that run different charities who were fooled by these two it's dissappointing to say the least. But those two already profited from the positive headlines. No one is going to bring up that they didn't give the promised donation.
Scammers!
Corruption ! 😡
😱 Scam Alert
Corruption don’t trust any of them
The sure need auditing
Fraud!!!!
Declining donations? Does that mean donars don't trust Archwell Foundation?
A scam from a gold digger, how could that happen? Who would have ever thought? - Of course it's a scam, her whole life is a scam!
With all the donations year upon year ( even in decline) why was no interest on deposit registered ? Suggesting that cash was deposited out as soon as it arrived in, and then re submitted for accounting purposes . 😊
You nailed it!! Something stinks!!
Why did he do that? Not normal or accurate. It wasn't cleared up on the books yet.
All in cahoots.
Tbf l heard that the governor didn’t hold a press conference about Archwell. He was holding one for a different unrelated reason and a journalist asked him about Archwell.
He seemed to be defending Archwell. Why would he do that?
Optics look really bad though. He could of declined to answer and it looked set up for it?
@@justmyopinion526 it definitely looks weird that he so fervently defended the charity but I guess I just wanted the video to be precise.
Such a fake😮
"check is in the mail" speaks to Markle's arrested development mentality, given financial remittances have been made online for decades....
Dangerous grifters,,,,
CharityWatch, a watchdog group in Chicago that investigates nonprofit organizations, said it considers the Archewell Foundation "not ratable” given that it was founded only recently and does not have enough years' worth of financial activity. CharityWatch CEO Laurie Styron said the foundation appears to stray from the norm in at least one aspect: In its 2022 tax filing, it reports its governing body consists of only two people - Harry and Meghan. She said the widely accepted minimum "best practice" in the nonprofit sector is five voting board members, "the majority of which should be independent." In general, "a charity whose board is too small and lacks a majority independent board is not well-positioned to consistently make decisions that are in the best interest of the charity or provide adequate oversight of its operations," Styron said. "Charities are not small businesses or hobbies intended to be controlled by one married couple or family. Rather, they are owned by the public for the public interest and are intended to exist as legal entities independent from the interests of the people running them."
That is clearifying. The foundation will go down eventually when no donations come in. But at what costs ? H & M make promises that will not be kept.
Lock them up.
That is interesting! When did they put this out out of interest? Their set up in California is very shady indeed!
@@buitefr1 you would hope so. I wonder like Amber Heard they don't break a sweat when saying pledge and donate are the same.
@@justmyopinion526 well, when people don't donate any more, the 'well' dries up. But for the people that run different charities who were fooled by these two it's dissappointing to say the least. But those two already profited from the positive headlines. No one is going to bring up that they didn't give the promised donation.
Newsome, that was a bad mistake. The Carparkles are some of the most hated people in the world.
The Grifters hard at work.
It was clearly a scam before this.
They "lost more than two thirds?"""" SCAMMERS!
THEIR 💰💰💰 IS RUNNING LOW ❕
( THEY ARE NOT IN ANY DEMAND FROM THE PUBLIC )…..
AM SURE THAT THE GOVERNMENT
WILL BE ON THEIR CASE ❕👀
They have a large office staff so what do those people do all day?
Corrupt!
⛏️🥜💎 💰 just sayin'