SCOTUS Demolishes Chevron Deference In Loper Bright | Impacts to FBAR, FATCA and the IRS at Large
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
- www.irsmedic.c...
In an incredible move the US Supreme Court struck down the "Chevron Deference" which essentially allowed any US agency to create any regulation it felt like by claiming the authorizing statute was ambiguous. As if a state is ambiguous, according to Chevron, all courts should defer to agency interpretation.
Decision here:
www.supremecou...
In the 40 years of Chevron, the US regulatory state has grown massive and has helped create the richest counties in the country- those around Washington DC.
Join the discussion with host Anthony Parent, Esq. along with long time guests, the Great JohnRichardson, Esq. and Keith Redmond the advocate for ands consulate to the American overseas.
You will not want to miss this. episode - every single federal regulations is now suspect.
if a law requires interpretation IT CANNOT BE LAW...
AMEN
Thank you. This is an excellent video.
did the US Congress intend the 16th Amendment to tax the hourly pay of the people?
NO, such an intent would subject the people into an unlawful and forced indenture...
It was all lies. And the Republican party went from being opposed ot the income tax in 1913 to full supported once that saw all that revenue and power come in and the few remaining shreds of the Constitution that weren't already shredded were thrown into a dumpster fire outside the back of the Capitol building.
@@irsmedic search "Whiskey Rebellion"; you'll find that George Washington wasn't ever fighting for freedom...
And just after you guys recorded this the court dropped another related case called Corner Post related to Loper Bright.
Corner Post allows people to challenge even old federal regulations say like FBAR rules from the 1970s if they are being harmed today in the present.
WOW! Thank you for your comment! OK this may need to get on its own podcast. Researching now. www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/corner-post-inc-v-board-of-governors-of-the-federal-reserve-system/
The cases this will make an more immediant impact on will be ones regarding the 2nd Amendment.
The problem with the live chat hypo of “Congress says ‘we want a couch’ and the agency knows how to build the couch” is that it’s a bad starting point for this type of legal reasoning and it also misses the point of the problems people had with Chevron.
Say I grant the premise of the hypothetical. What happens when the agency along with building the couch builds a table and chairs too? Or the agency says they have to knock a wall down in the house to make room for the coach? It’s not obvious that Congress’s desire to have a couch empowers the agency to build other furniture or knock down walls, even if the couch building experts think it’s a good idea.
And in the facts of Loper Bright, the statute didn’t empower the agency to charge the fishermen $700. Was the $700 fee just another bag of screws in the IKEA box? Maybe. But you cannot and should not defer to an agency in this type of situation if there was no statutory authority on point.
Thanks for your thoughtful comment - I am not sure if we took the hypo to that conclusion. What do you think the biggest problems with people had with Chevron?
The algo finally gave me this after a hundreds of garbage msm fear propaganda clips. I don’t know anything about the law but I understood everything you discussed and I now feel 10x more educated than I did after 2 hours of doom-scrolling.
YES!! WE BEAT THE ALGO!!!! Thanks for watching!
there is no such thing as a U.S. citizen; Ex parte Frank Knowles Ca 1855
Not my reading. Seems to say States cant naturalized; only the feds. casetext.com/case/ex-parte-knowles-19
@@irsmedic it says the States naturalize, the Fed makes the guidelines...
You guys have become experts at straw manning the hell out of any argument. JFC. Facts, data, and expertise needed to decipher them are not decided by a freaking vote.
?? What's the strawman(men) we offered?