Introduction to Dynamic Panel GMM: Video 1 of 5.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 жов 2024
  • This video provides a basic, easy-to-understand introduction to Dynamic Panel GMM estimation. It is the 1st of a 5-part series ending with how to use EViews to estimate Difference GMM and System GMM. Please watch all five videos to learn the development of the concepts and models. Thank you.
    System GMM: • System GMM: Video 5 of 5
    Difference GMM: • Difference GMM and Sys...
    Results & Diagnostics: • Interpretation of Pane...
    Persistence effect (lagged dependent variable): • The Persistence Effect...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @abbakpa
    @abbakpa 6 місяців тому +3

    i dont know where this video was when i was looking everywhere to learn this model, thank god i finally found it. very easy to understand and well detailed

  • @salamdenilsonsingh5150
    @salamdenilsonsingh5150 10 місяців тому +1

    I was looking for a video talking about GMM and Prof. uploading the video at the right moment. Thanks Prof. Pat Obi.

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  9 місяців тому

      You are welcome!

  • @abdullahbinomar3390
    @abdullahbinomar3390 10 місяців тому +2

    waiting next parts of this series impatiently... 🙂

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  10 місяців тому

      Part 2 is just published: ua-cam.com/video/gODby64xXsE/v-deo.htmlsi=ZWxU17azB4izqg4w

  • @anuverma9260
    @anuverma9260 21 день тому

    What material do you use for preparing the content of these videos?

  • @innocentwilly6216
    @innocentwilly6216 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you, Prof., for clarity

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  9 місяців тому

      You are welcome

  • @jonahgo7743
    @jonahgo7743 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you!

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  10 місяців тому +1

      You're welcome!

  • @lehuy7279
    @lehuy7279 7 місяців тому

    In the endogeneity problem, we will often use IV and 2SLS models for static estimates and GMM types for dynamic estimates, right?

  • @AccountingPianoHanhDung
    @AccountingPianoHanhDung 3 місяці тому

    Thank you so much

  • @MuhammadBilal-nv4dz
    @MuhammadBilal-nv4dz 9 місяців тому

    if we include year fixed effect it should be w(t) ot w(i)?

  • @gaalichemakram8879
    @gaalichemakram8879 10 місяців тому

    please what tests shoud use to detect endogeneity, heteroscedasticité and serail corelation in this case, thanks

    • @PatObi
      @PatObi  10 місяців тому +1

      Please watch the entire series, especially the last two videos (4 & 5). By NOT rejecting H0 of overidentifying restrictions, you are, in essence, confirming no endogeneity. The Arellano-Bond test of NO serial correlation is based on AR(2), which is shown. The two estimators (D-GMM & S-GMM) are robust for heteroskedasticity due to the GLS waiting that is applied in the estimation. Hope this helps.

    • @gaalichemakram8879
      @gaalichemakram8879 10 місяців тому

      @@PatObi thanks doc, i have watching many times all video it s very very herpful and comprhensive and i always refers to yours video, but i asked if i want to justify that my model need a Gmm estmation in general which a have endogeneity , heteroscedasti and serial correlation