How Much Do You Need to Retire in 2024?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @RS-jz2yu
    @RS-jz2yu Рік тому +8

    Hello James, i love your content. I found Ramsey about ten years ago and his methods have changed my life. I recently (1yr ago) found you and again, it has been a life changer. Ramsey got me out of debt except for my house and you have got me believing that i will be able to retire and stay in southern California. I continue to gain knowledge by watching a bunch of content creators and every once in a while one will scare me. Actually (taxes, health care and inflation) scare me. So, i rewatch some of your videos and i feel reassured about my situation. I'm 54 and plan to work another 8-10 years. I really appreciated the content on a single person's scenario. But i do my best to apply all of your concepts to my life. Thank you for everything and I wish you a happy new year.

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  Рік тому +1

      I’m glad to hear that! Happy New Year to you too.

    • @jameschaves5723
      @jameschaves5723 Рік тому

      I agree

  • @gabrielsala8980
    @gabrielsala8980 Рік тому +20

    Looks like there is an error on the 1sr case: 7.5k-4k SS = 3.5k per month which makes 42k withdrawal per year, not 67k.
    So they are on almost comfortable 4.2%, not 6.7

    • @peaceofcake8464
      @peaceofcake8464 Рік тому +2

      Two things. First, he didn't make clear that the 2000 per month for social security was not what they were actually going to get. That is their full retirement age amount. Since they are claiming early at 62, the amount is reduced. You can see that they only get 30800 from SS in the first year, not 44000. (Only collect SS for 11 months the first year since their birthdays are in January which means payments start in February.) Second, the savings are in IRA/401k which will be fully taxed on withdrawal also causing part of the social security to be taxed. Taxes are not included in the 7.5k/mo retirement expenses which means a bigger withdrawal to pay the taxes.

    • @mjmdiver1137
      @mjmdiver1137 9 місяців тому

      I think that the $2000 per person for SS is being de-rated from FRA and not the actual amount they would get upon retirement at 62, or possibly that he simply misstated the amount as what they would get and not the the FRA amount and didn't mention that it was supposed to be de-rated. This seems to be applying a double adjustment factor since he claimed that the $2000 was what they get but the first year was only $30600 and not $48000. This seems to be a strange way of presenting this because you will never be looking at the FRA number when you are taking about retiring today... You would use your "today" value.
      So, I think this is an error that he didn't catch. However, that only highlights the problem that he is trying to address, which otherwise is on-point I believe.

    • @miragexl007
      @miragexl007 9 місяців тому

      That's what I was wondering.. It wasn't explained out if it's something different

  • @M22Research
    @M22Research Рік тому +10

    Nicely done, a clean scenario comparison, as usual to illustrate the basics.
    Don’t neglect to plan for the periodic one time expenses. Fund a cash buffer to handle them. Examples could be new roof on the house, replacement vehicles, etc…

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  Рік тому

      Good point. Thank you.

  • @car9167
    @car9167 Рік тому +1

    Thank God I can retire back in Romania and live with no issue on $24k a year. When I left 14 years ago that was my salary with 2 kids

  • @Irshadba99
    @Irshadba99 Рік тому +3

    Great job James, very informative, great info to go on.

  • @EvaPerson-m5t
    @EvaPerson-m5t Рік тому +10

    Your examples always feature couples, or widows. Please give examples for those of us who never married.

  • @buyerclub2
    @buyerclub2 Рік тому +5

    You do make excellent clear videos. Every thought of changing to a fee only model? I bet you would do great, and I would be more than willing to advocate for people to hire you. As an AUM, nope I cant.

  • @bhayward3978
    @bhayward3978 Рік тому +3

    Thanks James! I love having yours and Ari’s videos to help me plan for retirement. I was looking for the link to the spreadsheet you referenced. I may have overlooked it.

  • @Trace555
    @Trace555 Рік тому +2

    James, Another great video! I went through a similar exercise to gain confidence in my decision to retire early. The timing of income streams (pension, social security, part-time income, etc.) is key to understanding the needed portfolio withdrawal rate. Thanks!

  • @bryanwhitton1784
    @bryanwhitton1784 Рік тому +4

    I thought you were going to post a link to a spreadsheet to work out one's expenses. I don;t see such a link.
    The last couple of videos have been useful. I am 14 years older than my wife and that video was interesting. Now this video to help on our retirement. I am already "retired". I quote it as I have a side gig that brings in about $1000 per month but only takes me an hour or two a day. I am on Medicare but haven't yet started SS. We are waiting till I am 70 to start collecting. That will be next December. I have about $750K in retirement funds and my wife has about the same. I am not too worried about our finances but we will have very different retirements due to the age differential. We are both essentially retiring single. We can't do anything now because she works. In 14 years when she retires I will be gone or in the no go years. Oh well.
    Please keep up with the videos.

  • @vanbrendle
    @vanbrendle Рік тому +2

    Is this an apples to apples scenario since one couple is 62 and the other is 67? Would like to see how it compares at the same ages but different social security withdrawal times. BTW, the content of your videos is superior to most.

  • @johnnybravo4679
    @johnnybravo4679 Рік тому +5

    James, I thought the first couple each had SS of $2000 each. But the graph shows only $24,000 SS income. What am I missing? Thanks

  • @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc
    @PorscheSpeedster-kz6nc Рік тому +1

    Love your videos. One thing I have noticed is that the “portfolio” has been simplified and assumes and % return but does not show separate dividend income. It may be taxed at a higher rate than capital gains. It would be helpful to show these and how they impact taxes and cash flow.

  • @eclipsecabin7841
    @eclipsecabin7841 Рік тому

    Excellent! Appreciate this info very much.

  • @MichaelToub
    @MichaelToub 10 місяців тому

    Great Video!

  • @ikyiAlter
    @ikyiAlter 11 місяців тому

    This is a great video. You explained it really well and in simple terms. And the way you did it is very soothing. Too bad I don't make anywhere enough to need to worry about this. 😅😅😅
    Simply save as much as I can and spend as little as I can. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Though, it does make me realize how little I spend on a monthly basis compared to your clients. So at least that's hopeful. 😅

  • @leftysidewinder
    @leftysidewinder Рік тому +1

    Seniors need to focus on ways to save money… senior discounts, churning credit card welcome bonuses, traveling during off peak times, or using their social security direct deposit to churn checking account welcome bonus

  • @Cheynayful
    @Cheynayful Рік тому +9

    I must be blind: where is the spread sheet he mentions he'd be sharing the link to (6:30)?

    • @phillipthomas3032
      @phillipthomas3032 Рік тому +3

      I am having trouble finding the link too

    • @88rampitup88
      @88rampitup88 Рік тому +3

      You're not blind. He hasn't posted it and hasn't responded to people asking about it. I'm guessing with the holidays and stuff, he's got other stuff going on. Hope he shares it soon. Getting my financial ducks in a row is my main resolution for 2024!

  • @jjgreek1
    @jjgreek1 8 місяців тому

    It all depends on where you live. If you live in West Virginia, you need very little to retire. If you live in LA you need a lot to retire. Also, depends on your kids. If they’re still financial,y dependent on you, then you need even more to retire. Also, depends on your living arrangement. Do you have a mortgage or not? My rule of thumb is to have about the same income in retirement that I had while I was working.

  • @wdeemarwdeemar8739
    @wdeemarwdeemar8739 9 місяців тому +1

    My 2 questions are what are the winning lottery numbers and when?

  • @gislesundbom2675
    @gislesundbom2675 Рік тому +2

    No spreadsheet in the description?

  • @mjones9088
    @mjones9088 Рік тому +4

    I would be curious to add another scenario, that retire at 62 and start collecting SS @ 67 FRA?

  • @debilish8451
    @debilish8451 10 місяців тому +1

    I keep wondering if you account for 1% in management fees? Instead of Tim and Sally taking out, for example, 2% of their investment wouldn’t they be taking out 3%?
    I imagine they would still be OK as compared to the other couple, but it always seems like that should be taken into consideration for those of us who do use a wealth manager like yourself. I understand the value, but I never see that those fees are included in the big picture.
    Do those fees get plugged in when forecasting?

  • @BadPhD777
    @BadPhD777 Рік тому +5

    What if they retired at 62 and didn't take SS until 67. Their portfolio would go down for a few years, but then would it recover when they start taking SS at 67?

    • @josephcler3299
      @josephcler3299 Рік тому +1

      Exactly right, Draw down on the investments a little more, but then when you collect later your social security payments will be higher.

    • @OnlyMusicExclusives
      @OnlyMusicExclusives Рік тому

      Wrong move. You would draw $90k/yr at $7500/month. In 5 years that $450k out of your portfolio to get an extra $500/month in ss benefits. You would need millions of dollars in savings to accomplish that. Not a smart move honestly

  • @pglover19
    @pglover19 Рік тому +3

    James. I have been watching the Root Financial videos (you and Ari) for years. These RightCaptial case studies gives us a good perspective on how financial advisors digest and interpret the information from these retirement planning tools. In a recent video from Ari, it looks like you and Ari are no longer taking on new clients personally. However, you will be able to assign another advisor within Root Financial. Will you or Ari be taking on new clients in the future? Please advise.

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  Рік тому +2

      Very few, and mostly just referrals from current clients. But the other advisors we’re bringing in the team are among the best in the industry.

    • @pglover19
      @pglover19 Рік тому +1

      @@RootFP Ok. I guess I waited too late.

  • @josephcler3299
    @josephcler3299 Рік тому +3

    Bill and Susan want $7500 per month to live on, they're getting $4000 in social security which means they only have to take $3500 each month or $42000 per year. This is a 4.2% withdraw rate.

    • @mjmdiver1137
      @mjmdiver1137 9 місяців тому

      He has an error in the spreadsheet. I think ir is derating SS down from SRA for the first example.

  • @mathalwaysii
    @mathalwaysii Рік тому +1

    I recently learned in order to be a root financial client, we need to have at least $2M assets for you to manage, that's excluding 401k etc. I am now confused with your videos of your clients with less than that amount. Are you showing real life examples?

  • @swbossert
    @swbossert Рік тому +10

    Hi James,
    Maybe I’m dense but in the first scenario, if they need $7,500/mo and get $4,000/mo Social Security , they need $3,500/mo from the portfolio, or $42,000/yr. 4.2% withdrawal rate. What did I miss?

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  Рік тому +9

      We have to tax extra for taxes so they get $7,500/mo after taxes. When you factor in taxes that must also be pulled out in the withdrawal it drives the withdrawal rate up.

    • @user-bv4sj2gq7g
      @user-bv4sj2gq7g Рік тому

      Even with taxes, only up to 85% of their SS is taxable. We need to know more about the $42K. Where is it coming from? A Roth or a taxable account? How much is qualified dividends or muni bond income? These things affect the total taxable income.

    • @mavtek
      @mavtek Рік тому

      @@RootFP They're married filing jointly on a total income of less than $100k. Their total tax rate should be less than 12%, so the numbers aren't adding up. If you're assuming a 6.5% return their portfolio should still be growing. Further, are they factoring in that when they turn 65 their healthcare costs should decline because they'll be eligible for Medicare? In reality, this couple should downsize and push their SS benefit until 65-67 and live off the proceeds from selling their home and their existing funds.

    • @dallison1961
      @dallison1961 Рік тому

      ​@RootFP But you didn't do that in the second scenario. Between social security and their portfolio withdrawal, they have a little over $90,000 or $7,500/month. At least in year one. Are you saying the second couple isn't paying anything in taxes?

    • @dallison1961
      @dallison1961 Рік тому

      ​@RootFP And with the first couple your example only shows them collecting around $30,000 from social security in the first year when they should be collecting close to $48,000 ($2,000/month for each person). I think your example assumes $2,000/month at their full retirement age and it is reduced because they are reiring at 62.
      I understand your general point in this video but you have muddied the water with your examples.

  • @traceyperrin1827
    @traceyperrin1827 Рік тому

    Where is the link so we can work out what we need that you mentioned?

  • @jcinkc3
    @jcinkc3 Рік тому +3

    You have Bill and Susan taking out 67k their first year…. With 7500.00 a month (less their 4000.00) they need to withdraw 3500.00 a month x12 = 42000.00 a year they need to withdraw.

    • @mjmdiver1137
      @mjmdiver1137 9 місяців тому

      Error in the spreadsheet.

  • @keepitreal1547
    @keepitreal1547 11 місяців тому

    I know all manner of people/couples & none of them require a $7500 pm spenditure in retirement.
    I indeed travel the world skimping on nothing for $2000 pm.
    I've no idea how some people burn through money.

  • @livinforlessinsingapore3601

    You didn’t clarify the tax effect. For first couple, they seem to need about $98k at 62. Yet the second couple only seem to need about $90k at 67. This is already in the second couple’s favour.
    Both couples APPEAR to have the same $7500 per month spending desire. However, at 67, the first couple’s spending is much MORE than $7500, as the graph slopes upwards. The second couple’s is only $7500. So naturally the second couple does better in the long run, as they are ALWAYS spending less at every age level.

  • @warrenmartin5935
    @warrenmartin5935 Рік тому +4

    Most people don't have near those amounts

    • @ziggystardog
      @ziggystardog Рік тому +2

      Most people don’t use financial planners, or use them when it’s already too late

    • @growsinhouseherbiculturali1100
      @growsinhouseherbiculturali1100 Рік тому

      Yeah, better vote 🗳️ to keep those stock market gains!

    • @ystebadvonschlegel3295
      @ystebadvonschlegel3295 Рік тому +1

      These videos are not for “most” people

    • @jerrys88
      @jerrys88 8 місяців тому

      @@ziggystardog Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Calculus - all taught in high school. Not a single word about personal finance. Never heard of an IRA until my 30s. It was never mentioned, even when learning about compound interest. I'm lucky to have self-educated myself and caught up, but why was nothing taught about it in high school? It's appalling.

  • @HonestOne
    @HonestOne Рік тому

    Im younger and I decided to just try this as a single person. Age , 43 now. I wish i had the 7500 he is referring to but the basic principal works. Im just on a smaller scale of one person. My biggest fear is my age. Dividends have become an important tool to stops me from selling assets. I dont want to start until age ,50. I need help on ensuring longevity and keeping up with inflation. Right now it looks as if im doing ok. But all knowlege helps. To stay within my desired withdrawal rate i had to remove professional management. I simply need to pay myself first but if i thought that they would do better than myself id had them my accounts.

  • @Andy-hg8dv
    @Andy-hg8dv Рік тому +1

    The second couple gave away 5 years of retirement life. The value of that needs to be included at some level. The first couple just needs to review and lower their expenses. I’d still rather be them.

  • @favjr
    @favjr 9 місяців тому

    Good math. But looks like that first couple needs a better portfolio. Certainly won't work if they are paying advisor fees. The latter couple is clearly underspending and is also very poorly advised.

  • @ericshang7744
    @ericshang7744 Рік тому +2

    The second couple will die with lots of cash. Not sure that’s best of all options.
    Also, people don’t usually spend the same amount across their retirement I presume.

  • @kennitz8155
    @kennitz8155 Рік тому

    Question: I just retired and want to take out $100K per year from my IRA and 401k, but I have to pay taxes on that money. Let's say I'm in the 24% tax bracket (my wife is still working). How do I calculate how much do I have to take out from my IRA to pay the taxes on the 100k I just took out, and since I will then have to pay taxes on that amount as well, how much more? And then the taxes on that amount....

    • @OnlyMusicExclusives
      @OnlyMusicExclusives Рік тому

      To get $100k to you it would be $124k out of portfolio with the 24% with holdings. Big chunk in taxes.

    • @markwilder7427
      @markwilder7427 10 місяців тому

      Divide 100K by .76. Don’t simply add 24K thinking that will net you 100K if you’re paying 24% in taxes.

  • @sergejpanov5543
    @sergejpanov5543 11 місяців тому

    I have $3,500.00 in my account. It will last me for a month or two. How do I retire?

  • @HumarAndArt8800
    @HumarAndArt8800 10 місяців тому

    The big difference is their retirement age of 4 years between the two scenario. This is not an apple to apple comparison.

  • @88rampitup88
    @88rampitup88 Рік тому +1

    I am a total noobie but don't understand your discussion about the first couple. 7500/month budget is 90k/year, and they're going to get 48k per year in social security. Your graph showed them only get 31k from SSI that first year, which I don't understand, but even if that was correct, why would they pull almost 68k out of their savings that year? That would give them 100k/yr when we said they wanted to live on 90k. Is that just some automatic cushion we need to factor in?
    And by their early 80s, I would have assumed downsizing that $800,000 house is viable if not preferable, especially since it will probably be worth twice that by then.

    • @RootFP
      @RootFP  Рік тому +2

      They want $7,500/mo after taxes. So the extra amount is to pay fed/state taxes

    • @88rampitup88
      @88rampitup88 Рік тому

      @@RootFP Ah ok, thanks. Like I said, noobie :)

  • @keepitreal1547
    @keepitreal1547 11 місяців тому

    This scenario is simple, they're both different ages & have a 33.3% difference in SS.
    It's not rocket science.

  • @davidroth7859
    @davidroth7859 Рік тому

    Are we assuming Bill and Susan want 7,500 per month after taxes ?

  • @stephenholcomb9278
    @stephenholcomb9278 11 місяців тому

    There are two major fallacies with this video. First you assume Social Security will be stable and fully funded going forward. Second you don’t take into account them 5 more years of healthy retirement the first couple enjoyed. Also, it’s not practical that your expenses will stay as high when you reach your 80s

  • @70qq
    @70qq Рік тому

    🤘

  • @davido8326
    @davido8326 11 місяців тому

    His numbers look like crap, his assumptions are so unclear this is worthless 😂😂😂😂

  • @timisaac8121
    @timisaac8121 Рік тому +1

    I'm sure I am the dick: But these make me laugh. You have a million AND Assumed inc of 6.5% and you can't make it work???? Maybe I use new math - 65K + 24 + 24 is greater than the 7.5 X 12 (113 > 90) Sure there is tax but here is 23 for tax.
    But you can't fix stupid. Peace out.

  • @stephenholcomb9278
    @stephenholcomb9278 11 місяців тому +1

    The backbone of your retirement should not be Social Security. It should be your portfolio. Backwards thinking in my opinion.

    • @FinancialySpeaking
      @FinancialySpeaking 8 місяців тому +1

      Not the point that he seems to be making. His main point was 1) know expenses and 2) how much does your portfolio need. The portfolio would need less if you have real estate, business income, pensions, annuities, etc.